I fixed the things and made the upload. Thanks for your work!
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 src:debian-edu-config
Bug #1107714 [src:debian-edu] debian-edu: autopkgtest regression: dovecot-core
fails to install
Bug reassigned from package 'src:debian-edu' to 'src:debian-edu-config'.
No longer marked as found in versions debian-edu/2.12.17.
Ignor
Control: reassign -1 src:debian-edu-config
Control: close -1
Control: fixed -1 2.12.901
On Fr 13 Jun 2025 10:08:40 CEST, Mike Gabriel wrote:
Hi Paul,
On Do 12 Jun 2025 17:00:50 CEST, Paul Gevers wrote:
Source: debian-edu
Version: 2.12.17
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
U
I have raised a sponsorship request [1] and an unblock request [2] for
an NMU to fix this in case the package maintainer is not currently able
to take over this issue quickly at this stage in the freeze.
Hope this helps!
[1] RFS: https://bugs.debian.org/1109081
[2] unblock: https://bugs.debian.or
On Fri, Jul 04, 2025 at 09:21:19PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 04, 2025 at 06:12:34PM +, tony mancill wrote:
>
> > Because the failures occur for multiple different tests, I don't think
> > we should attempt to disable tests 1-by-1, I expect that to become a
> > game of whack-a-m
tags 1108812 patch
thanks
Hi.
I've just read the last message from the author in github. Apparently
the failing test needs quite a number of changes to be correct.
I would suggest to just disable it for trixie, as in the attached patch.
Note: I've forked the project here:
https://salsa.debian.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1108812 patch
Bug #1108812 [src:remake] remake: FTBFS randomly: Error running
/<>/tests/../make (expected 0; got 14):
/<>/tests/../make -f work/features/output-sync.mk -j -Orecurse
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Ple
For the record, I've put more recent failed build logs in the same place as
before:
https://people.debian.org/~sanvila/build-logs/202507/
Based on that, this is what we know:
- It fails the same when using 6.12.33+deb13-cloud-amd64.
- It fails the same regardless of using unshare or the old sch
On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 12:09:48AM +0200, Étienne Mollier wrote:
> 0. if I trust Helmut Grohne, I cannot empty the entropy pool;
> maybe I can just make it more strained, so the behavior may
> be unreproducible to some extent: for instance I have not
> managed to reproduce the behavior
Hi Santiago,
I've been banging my head a fair part of the day wondering why
the error seemed to never occur when I was staring at it. My
current conjecture would be to look at what happens when
stressing the entropy pool of the machine, as the random source
seems to behave slightly differently de
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 1109072 normal
Bug #1109072 [mlock] mlock: Package mlock missing in trixie
Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1109072: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/
severity 1109072 normal
thanks
On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 07:39:37PM +, Lloyd wrote:
> Package: mlock
> Version: 8:2007f~dfsg-7.1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: trixie patch
> Affects: alpine
>
> The mlock program is missing in trixie. This is possibly related to the
> sudden depreciation of uw-im
Source: optee-os
Version: 4.5.0-1
Severity: grave
Tags: security upstream
X-Debbugs-Cc: car...@debian.org, Debian Security Team
Hi,
The following vulnerability was published for optee-os.
CVE-2025-46733[0]:
| OP-TEE is a Trusted Execution Environment (TEE) designed as
| companion to a non-secur
On Wed, 9 Jul 2025 15:48:33 +0200 Pirate Praveen wrote:
and run gitlab-rake db:seed_fu (this creates default organization)
This would break ci for new installations, but better than not able to
create projects.
Web IDE seems to be broken too with a similar error message in
/var/log/gitlab/p
Package: mlock
Version: 8:2007f~dfsg-7.1
Severity: serious
Tags: trixie patch
Affects: alpine
The mlock program is missing in trixie. This is possibly related to the sudden
depreciation of uw-imap.
However, mlock is a standalone program with no dependencies on uw-imap outside
the build system.
Your message dated Thu, 10 Jul 2025 21:34:17 +0200
with message-id
and subject line new projects creation is fixed in 17.6.5-19
has caused the Debian Bug report #1107585,
regarding Unable to create new projects with gitlab 17.6.5
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
Hello Security Team,
Would you be interested in a bullseye update for redis in order to
address the two latest CVEs?
That would be:
* CVE-2025-32023 (#1108975)
* CVE-2025-48367 (#1108981)
I'm preparing parallel updates for buster, stretch and buster, as well
as an update for unstable (#1108
Package: rust-sequoia-octopus-librnp
Version: 1.11.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Hi,
rust-sequoia-octopus-librnp fails to build from source when enabling the
nocheck build profile.
| /usr/share/cargo/bin/cargo build --release
| debian cargo wrapper: options = ['parallel=8', 'nocheck'], prof
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> clone 1107585 -1
Bug #1107585 [gitlab] Unable to create new projects with gitlab 17.6.5
Bug 1107585 cloned as bug 1109069
> retitle -1 ci jwt token generation is disabled
Bug #1109069 [gitlab] Unable to create new projects with gitlab 17.6.5
Chang
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 1107585 help
Bug #1107585 [gitlab] Unable to create new projects with gitlab 17.6.5
Added tag(s) help.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1107585: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug
Hi
On 10-07-2025 19:52, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
On 2025-07-10 15:24:26 +0200, Cédric Boutillier wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: ruby-mimema...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:ruby-mimemagic
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags:
On Thu, 10 Jul 2025, 14:12 Simon McVittie, wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
>
> On Thu, 12 Jun 2025 at 15:40:04 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
>
> Luca Boccassi reports that after GNOME 46, "this actually breaks login
> completely - after typing the password, the greeter is just stuck
> there",
On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 03:57:25PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2025-07-10 14:01:41 +0200, Urs Janßen wrote:
> > First of all, expired filter rules have ever been removed from the
> > filter file since Iain changed the format between tin-1.22 and
> > 270194APLHA so that behaviour is the same
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1109015 - moreinfo
Bug #1109015 [firmware-atheros] Wifi not working anymore with new atheros
firmware from experimental
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
> forwarded 1109015
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-firmware/d93218e8ac26a2ef52b70f6729b288a1cf
Your message dated Thu, 10 Jul 2025 14:35:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1037840: fixed in regina-normal 7.3.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1037840,
regarding regina-normal: ftbfs with GCC-13
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit
Processing control commands:
> tags 1066565 + patch
Bug #1066565 [src:fvwm1] fvwm1: FTBFS: configure.c:2119:5: error: implicit
declaration of function ‘mygetostype’; did you mean ‘mygethostname’?
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 1066565 + pending
Bug #1066565 [s
Control: tags 1066565 + patch
Control: tags 1066565 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for fvwm1 (versioned as 1.24r-57.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should cancel it.
Regards.
diff -u fvwm1-1.24r/debian/changelog fvwm1-1.24r/debian/changelog
--
On Thu, 10 Jul 2025 at 14:12:20 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
Workarounds and possible solutions
==
enable-smartcard-authentication=false
...
This is the brute-force approach that makes sure password
authentication definitely always works as expected, at the cost
On 2025-07-10 14:01:41 +0200, Urs Janßen wrote:
> First of all, expired filter rules have ever been removed from the
> filter file since Iain changed the format between tin-1.22 and
> 270194APLHA so that behaviour is the same for the last ~31 years.
It is possible that these filter rules got remov
Hi all,
Debian received a regression report for a recent update to the WCN7850:
On Wed, 2025-07-09 at 17:25 +0200, Bastian Venthur wrote:
[...]
> With latest update from atheros firmware, the wifi stopped working completely.
> I believe the relevant output for dmesg is:
>
> [ 14.618942] ath12k
I realized that I sent the lspci with sudo, here's the one without:
c2:00.0 Network controller [0280]: Qualcomm Technologies, Inc WCN785x
Wi-Fi 7(802.11be) 320MHz 2x2 [FastConnect 7800] [17cb:1107] (rev 01)
Subsystem: Lenovo Device [17aa:e0e6]
Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecC
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 1109024 with 1109054
Bug #1109024 [src:ruby-mimemagic] ruby-mimemagic: autopkgtest regression:
non-zero exit status 1
1109024 was not blocked by any bugs.
1109024 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 1109024: 1109054
> thanks
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # needs debugging by someone with a working NFS setup
> tags 1108438 + moreinfo
Bug #1108438 [gnome-shell] Very slow to start with NFS-mounted home directory
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Thu, 12 Jun 2025 at 15:40:04 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
the default configuration of gdm is such
that, if a user has a smart card (e.g. Yubikey) plugged in, but *has
not* enrolled it for smartcard authentication, then gdm doesn't work
as intended for ordinary u
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #1051785 [gdm3] gdm3 won't allow logins when a smartcard/yubikey is plugged
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
1051785: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1051785
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Source: bmake
Version: 20200710-16
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: regression
Dear maintainer(s),
Your package has an autopkgtest, great. However, it fails since January
2025. Can you please investigate the situation and fix it? I copied some
of the output at the b
Hi,
Thanks for the report.
somehow, this package misses a rebuild against ruby3.3.
We should request a binNMU.
Cheers,
Cédric
> Source: ruby-mimemagic
> Version: 0.4.3-1
> Severity: serious
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: regression
>
> Dear maintainer(s),
>
> Your package has an
Package: tin
Version: 1:2.6.5~20250409-1
Followup-For: Bug #1109039
First of all, expired filter rules have ever been removed from the
filter file since Iain changed the format between tin-1.22 and
270194APLHA so that behaviour is the same for the last ~31 years.
Second, comments in attributes (a
On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 12:48:26AM +0100, Richard Lewis wrote:
> I tested a bsd-mailx with your patch applied in a systemd-nspawn
> container (unstable), with exim, and it fixed the original issue
> (which i could reproduce)
>
> i also installed postfix and it continued to work (but i didnt try
>
BTS, does not like my private email address, resending.
On 10.07.25 13:03, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Other firmware files under ath12k/WCN7850/hw2.0 changed in upstream
versions 20250509 and 20250613.
Can you please test version 20250509-1 (from snapshot.debian.org) so we
can tell which of the 2 upd
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notfound 1109015 firmware-nonfree/20250410-2
Bug #1109015 [firmware-atheros] Wifi not working anymore with new atheros
firmware from experimental
No longer marked as found in versions firmware-nonfree/20250410-2.
> thanks
Stopping processing here
Control: severity -1 important
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
On Thu, 2025-07-10 at 11:21 +0200, Markus Johnsson wrote:
> Package: linux-headers-6.1.0-37-amd64
> Version: 6.1.140-1
> Severity: serious
>
> Hello Debian team,
>
> (First, I wish to apologize for not using the report tool fully. I used it
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 important
Bug #1109040 [linux-headers-6.1.0-37-amd64] Subject:
linux-headers-6.1.0-37-amd64 missing config files; cannot build external
modules on Bookworm
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
> tag -1 moreinfo
Bug #1109040 [linux-headers-6.1.0-37
Control: tag -1 moreinfo upstream
Hi Bastian,
On Wed, 2025-07-09 at 17:25 +0200, Bastian Venthur wrote:
[...]
> With latest update from atheros firmware, the wifi stopped working completely.
> I believe the relevant output for dmesg is:
>
> [ 14.618942] ath12k_pci :c2:00.0: BAR 0 [mem 0xb0
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 moreinfo upstream
Bug #1109015 [firmware-atheros] Wifi not working anymore with new atheros
firmware from experimental
Added tag(s) upstream and moreinfo.
--
1109015: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1109015
Debian Bug Tracking System
Conta
Your message dated Thu, 10 Jul 2025 09:49:45 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1108931: fixed in horizon 3:25.3.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1108931,
regarding openstack-dashboard: causes packages removal to fail
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem h
On Thu, 2025-07-10 at 09:53 +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> I tend to agree -- the package is in contrib, which I think are entitled
> to do "bad" things like downloading executables from the Internet and
> use them?
Correct; the package source itself is DFSG, but it depends on non-
free binary
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1108931 in horizon reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/openstack-team/services/horizon/-/commit/2a116a799a888e20
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1108931 [openstack-dashboard] openstack-dashboard: causes packages removal
to fail
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1108931: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1108931
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problem
Package: linux-headers-6.1.0-37-amd64
Version: 6.1.140-1
Severity: serious
Hello Debian team,
(*First, I wish to apologize for not using the report tool fully. I used it
and took the contents of the report from there to complete it, but my SMTP
server failed to send the report, so I sent it manua
Your message dated Thu, 10 Jul 2025 09:07:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1108751: fixed in swift 2.35.0-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1108751,
regarding swift: flaky autopkgtest
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is n
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1108751 [src:swift] swift: flaky autopkgtest
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1108751: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1108751
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1108751 in swift reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/openstack-team/services/swift/-/commit/b7db7ae6532f21fee046
Source: mdanalysis
Followup-For: Bug #1108309
X-Debbugs-Cc: 1108...@bugs.debian.org
Control: tags -1 ftbfs
Santiago Vila wrote:
> But the build logs from buildd.debian.org which I quoted in my initial
> report, where the build fails with timeout:
> ...
> happened on machines with more than 2 CPUs,
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 ftbfs
Bug #1108309 [src:mdanalysis] mdanalysis: FTBFS randomly: autobuilder hangs
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1108309 to the same tags previously set
--
1108309: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1108309
Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 10 Jul 2025 08:34:24 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1108973: fixed in gst-plugins-bad1.0 1.26.2-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1108973,
regarding gst-plugins-bad1.0: CVE-2025-6663
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been de
Package: tin
Version: 1:2.6.5~20250409-1
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
When running tin after the upgrade to the new version, some of the
user configuration is removed (I could see that from a backup):
* in .tin/attributes: user comments (including commented rules).
Mathias Gibbens writes:
> control: tags -1 + confirmed patch
>
> I disagree that this is a policy violation; the cause of error is
> clearly reported. Not sure how the script could be more resilient when
> a remote resource has disappeared:
I tend to agree -- the package is in contrib, which I
control: tags -1 + confirmed patch
I disagree that this is a policy violation; the cause of error is
clearly reported. Not sure how the script could be more resilient when
a remote resource has disappeared:
> Setting up firmware-b43-installer (1:019-13) ...
> No chroot environment found. Starti
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed patch
Bug #1109025 [firmware-b43-installer] firmware-b43-installer: firmware download
fails due to broken upstream URL and checksum mismatch
Added tag(s) patch and confirmed.
--
1109025: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1109025
Source: amd64-microcode
Version: 3.20250311.1
Severity: grave
Tags: security upstream
X-Debbugs-Cc: car...@debian.org, Debian Security Team
Control: found -1 3.20250311.1~deb12u1
Hi Henrique,
The following vulnerabilities were published for amd64-microcode.
CVE-2024-36350[0]:
| A transient exec
Processing control commands:
> found -1 3.20250311.1~deb12u1
Bug #1109035 [src:amd64-microcode] amd64-microcode: 2024-36350/TSA-SQ and
CVE-2024-36357/TSA-L1
Marked as found in versions amd64-microcode/3.20250311.1~deb12u1.
--
1109035: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1109035
De
62 matches
Mail list logo
