Bug#1095028: trying to reproduce the problem

2025-06-09 Thread Larry Doolittle
Debian supporters - This bug sounds disturbing. I use xvfb-run "all the time" on Bookworm, and have never seen it act up. I agree with Simon, the symptoms sound like a race condition, even though the shell script and its concept seem sound, and have worked well for many years. Does anyone have a

Bug#1106799: marked as done (e2fsck-static: statically linked against glibc without a Built-Using: field)

2025-06-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 10 Jun 2025 01:53:41 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1106799: fixed in e2fsprogs 1.47.2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1106799, regarding e2fsck-static: statically linked against glibc without a Built-Using: field to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#1107566: marked as done (Missing dependency: qml6-module-org-kde-kirigamiaddons-settings)

2025-06-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 09 Jun 2025 21:08:47 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1107566: fixed in kasts 25.04.2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1107566, regarding Missing dependency: qml6-module-org-kde-kirigamiaddons-settings to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the p

Bug#1107569: iem-plugin-suite: FTBFS on armhf, i386, ppc64el, s390x

2025-06-09 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Source: iem-plugin-suite Version: 1.15.0-2 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-...@lists.debian.org, debian-powe...@lists.debian.org, debian-s...@lists.debian.org, sramac...@debian.org User: debian-...@li

Bug#1027451: libunwind-*-dev: Please remove Provides: libunwind-dev

2025-06-09 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi Sylvestre, On Fri, 25 Apr 2025 12:11:04 +0200 Sylvestre Ledru wrote: yeah, i was waiting to have more contents before upload but I will just go ahead today. Did this slip through the cracks? We're deep in the Hard Freeze, time is running out for trixie. Paul OpenPGP_signature.asc Des

Bug#1106107: breezy: FTBFS on s390x during the tests: breezy.tests.fixtures.TimeoutException: 6000

2025-06-09 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi, On Mon, 19 May 2025 19:48:47 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote: The recent upload of breezy fails to build on s390x buildds (5 times already). And the sixth time it succeeded. That's a pretty bad score. I suggest to disable the test (on s390x) or marked flaky until the issue is better understood.

Bug#1107566: Missing dependency: qml6-module-org-kde-kirigamiaddons-settings

2025-06-09 Thread Mike Gabriel
Package: kasts Version: 25.04.0-3 Severity: serious I just test kasts in Debian trixie and manually had to add qml6-module-org-kde-kirigamiaddons-settings to make the software start successfully. Please add the named package to the Depends: field of kasts. Thanks, Mike -- System Information: De

Bug#1060960: Bug #1060960 (libslf4j-java: FTBFS: make: *** [debian/rules:4: build] Error 25) is tagged patch but I can't find a patch

2025-06-09 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi, On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 15:10:41 +0200 Ben Hutchings wrote: ... Any progress on this? We're now deep into the Hard Freeze. Time is running out. Paul OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Processed: [bts-link] source package nodejs

2025-06-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package nodejs > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/ > # > user debian-bts-l...@lists.debian.org Setting

Processed: block 1105124 with 1102655

2025-06-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 1105124 with 1102655 Bug #1105124 {Done: Paul Gevers } [src:jsonnet] src:jsonnet: fails to migrate to testing for too long 1105124 was not blocked by any bugs. 1105124 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 1105124: 1102655 > t

Bug#1079338: marked as done (FTBFS with newer imagemagick7)

2025-06-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 09 Jun 2025 13:34:03 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1079338: fixed in rss-glx 0.9.1-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #1079338, regarding FTBFS with newer imagemagick7 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If thi

Processed: Re: Bug#1107403: gmtsar:FTBFS:build failed(gcc: error: unrecognized command-line option ‘-m64’)

2025-06-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 important Bug #1107403 {Done: Antonio Valentino } [src:gmtsar] gmtsar:FTBFS:build failed(gcc: error: unrecognized command-line option ‘-m64’) Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' -- 1107403: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1107

Bug#1107403: gmtsar:FTBFS:build failed(gcc: error: unrecognized command-line option ‘-m64’)

2025-06-09 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
Control: severity -1 important Lowering the severity as gmtsar never built successfully on riscv64 since its introduction in the archive. No need to trigger testing autoremoval for this issue, nor prepare a targeted fix for trixie. Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 Fi

Bug#1106824: marked as done (valkey: CVE-2025-27151)

2025-06-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 09 Jun 2025 12:49:07 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1106824: fixed in valkey 8.1.1+dfsg1-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1106824, regarding valkey: CVE-2025-27151 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If thi

Bug#1106824: valkey: diff for NMU version 8.1.1+dfsg1-1.1

2025-06-09 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi Lucas, On Mon, Jun 09, 2025 at 08:42:57AM -0300, Lucas Kanashiro wrote: > On Mon, 2025-06-09 at 11:04 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > > > I've prepared an NMU for valkey (versioned as 8.1.1+dfsg1-1.1) and > > uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I > > should cancel i

Bug#1106824: valkey: diff for NMU version 8.1.1+dfsg1-1.1

2025-06-09 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
On Mon, 2025-06-09 at 11:04 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > I've prepared an NMU for valkey (versioned as 8.1.1+dfsg1-1.1) and > uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I > should cancel it. > > There is a MR prepared as well on the packaging repo as per > https://salsa.de

Bug#1088266: marked as done (netdata: ineffective Replaces due to /usr-move (DEP17))

2025-06-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 09 Jun 2025 09:15:54 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1107082: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1088266, regarding netdata: ineffective Replaces due to /usr-move (DEP17) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pr

Bug#1106824: valkey: diff for NMU version 8.1.1+dfsg1-1.1

2025-06-09 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Control: tags 1106824 + patch Control: tags 1106824 + pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for valkey (versioned as 8.1.1+dfsg1-1.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I should cancel it. There is a MR prepared as well on the packaging repo as per https://sals

Processed: valkey: diff for NMU version 8.1.1+dfsg1-1.1

2025-06-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags 1106824 + patch Bug #1106824 [src:valkey] valkey: CVE-2025-27151 Added tag(s) patch. > tags 1106824 + pending Bug #1106824 [src:valkey] valkey: CVE-2025-27151 Added tag(s) pending. -- 1106824: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1106824 Debian Bu