Bug#1105164: linux-image-6.1.0-35-amd64: watchdog kernel module load errors with "Bad message"

Hi [not yet trimming the CC list to give a short update] On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 10:34:51PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Control: severity -1 serious > > Hi Robert, > > On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 04:38:19PM +0100, Robert Shearman wrote: > > Package: src:linux > > Version: 6.1.137-1 > > Sev

Processed: reassign 1105164 to ftp.debian.org, affects 1105164

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 1105164 ftp.debian.org Bug #1105164 [src:linux] linux-image-6.1.0-35-amd64: watchdog kernel module load errors with "Bad message" Bug reassigned from package 'src:linux' to 'ftp.debian.org'. No longer marked as found in versions linux/6.

Bug#1105117: Processed: retitle 1103801 to mimetex: CVE-2024-40445 CVE-2024-40446

Hi Hilmar, On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 11:22:09PM +0200, Hilmar Preuße wrote: > On 16.05.25 22:46, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 10:03:38PM +0200, Hilmar Preuße wrote: > > > On 21.04.25 21:09, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > Hello Salvatore, > > > > later I split off

Bug#1104815: marked as done (clojure: ftbfs with Exception in thread "main" java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError)

Your message dated Fri, 16 May 2025 20:51:01 -0500 with message-id <87plg8qa2i@trouble.defaultvalue.org> and subject line Re: clojure: ftbfs with Exception in thread "main" java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError has caused the Debian Bug report #1104815, regarding clojure: ftbfs with Exception

Bug#1091561: marked as done (Bug#1091561: btrfs-compsize: FTBFS: radix-tree.h:51:9: error: unknown type name ‘gfp_t’)

Your message dated Fri, 16 May 2025 22:04:15 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1091561: fixed in btrfs-compsize 1.5-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1091561, regarding Bug#1091561: btrfs-compsize: FTBFS: radix-tree.h:51:9: error: unknown type name ‘gfp_t’ to be marked as done. This

Processed: Re: Bug#1091561: btrfs-compsize: FTBFS on i386: radix-tree.h:51:9: error: unknown type name ‘gfp_t’

Processing control commands: > tag -1 patch Bug #1091561 [src:btrfs-compsize] btrfs-compsize: FTBFS on i386: radix-tree.h:51:9: error: unknown type name ‘gfp_t’ Added tag(s) patch. > retitle -1 Bug#1091561: btrfs-compsize: FTBFS: radix-tree.h:51:9: error: > unknown type name ‘gfp_t’ Bug #1091561

Bug#1091561: btrfs-compsize: FTBFS on i386: radix-tree.h:51:9: error: unknown type name ‘gfp_t’

Control: tag -1 patch Control: retitle -1 Bug#1091561: btrfs-compsize: FTBFS: radix-tree.h:51:9: error: unknown type name ‘gfp_t’ Lucas Nussbaum writes: > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, this package failed to build > on i386. > > This package currently has binary packages on i386, so

Bug#1105117: Processed: retitle 1103801 to mimetex: CVE-2024-40445 CVE-2024-40446

On 16.05.25 22:46, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 10:03:38PM +0200, Hilmar Preuße wrote: On 21.04.25 21:09, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: Hello Salvatore, later I split off CVE-2024-40445 into Debian bug #1105117. Recently I learned that only Windows systems are affe

Processed: fixed 1105883 in 1.3.0-1~exp1, fixed 1105885 in 1.3.0-1~exp1

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > fixed 1105883 1.3.0-1~exp1 Bug #1105883 [src:libavif] libavif: CVE-2025-48175 Marked as fixed in versions libavif/1.3.0-1~exp1. > fixed 1105885 1.3.0-1~exp1 Bug #1105885 [src:libavif] libavif: CVE-2025-48174 Marked as fixed in versions libavif/1.3

Bug#1105117: Processed: retitle 1103801 to mimetex: CVE-2024-40445 CVE-2024-40446

Hi Hilmar, On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 10:03:38PM +0200, Hilmar Preuße wrote: > On 21.04.25 21:09, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > Hello Salvatore, > > later I split off CVE-2024-40445 into Debian bug #1105117. Recently I > learned that only Windows systems are affected. No, I did not manage y

Bug#1104843: marked as done (qingping-ble: FTBFS: E ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'home_assistant_bluetooth')

Your message dated Fri, 16 May 2025 20:34:14 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1104843: fixed in qingping-ble 0.10.0-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1104843, regarding qingping-ble: FTBFS: E ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'home_assistant_bluetooth' to be marked as done. This

Bug#1104845: marked as done (rapt-ble: FTBFS: E ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'home_assistant_bluetooth')

Your message dated Fri, 16 May 2025 20:34:23 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1104845: fixed in rapt-ble 0.1.2-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1104845, regarding rapt-ble: FTBFS: E ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'home_assistant_bluetooth' to be marked as done. This means th

Bug#1104841: marked as done (oralb-ble: FTBFS: E ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'home_assistant_bluetooth')

Your message dated Fri, 16 May 2025 20:34:05 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1104841: fixed in oralb-ble 0.18.0-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1104841, regarding oralb-ble: FTBFS: E ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'home_assistant_bluetooth' to be marked as done. This means

Bug#1105117: Processed: retitle 1103801 to mimetex: CVE-2024-40445 CVE-2024-40446

On 21.04.25 21:09, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: Hello Salvatore, later I split off CVE-2024-40445 into Debian bug #1105117. Recently I learned that only Windows systems are affected. No, I did not manage yet to get the source code of mimetex 1.77 from anywhere. So I'd close bug #1105117

Bug#1104831: marked as done (bthome-ble: FTBFS: E ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'home_assistant_bluetooth')

Your message dated Fri, 16 May 2025 19:49:00 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1104831: fixed in bthome-ble 3.12.5-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1104831, regarding bthome-ble: FTBFS: E ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'home_assistant_bluetooth' to be marked as done. This mea

Bug#1104815:

I believe we can close this bug report. After quite a lot of debugging, it looks like our environment had built a broken version of the spec-alpha-clojure package. After rebuilding spec-alpha-clojure again, in a build environment containing libcore-specs-alpha-clojure 0.4.74-1, clojure 1.12.0-1,

Bug#1105886: python-tornado: CVE-2025-47287

Source: python-tornado Version: 6.4.2-1 Severity: grave Tags: security upstream X-Debbugs-Cc: car...@debian.org, Debian Security Team Hi, The following vulnerability was published for python-tornado. CVE-2025-47287[0]: | Tornado is a Python web framework and asynchronous networking | library. W

Bug#1105885: libavif: CVE-2025-48174

Source: libavif Version: 1.2.1-1 Severity: grave Tags: security upstream Justification: user security hole Forwarded: https://github.com/AOMediaCodec/libavif/pull/2768 X-Debbugs-Cc: car...@debian.org, Debian Security Team Hi, The following vulnerability was published for libavif. CVE-2025-48174

Bug#1105883: libavif: CVE-2025-48175

Source: libavif Version: 1.2.1-1 Severity: grave Tags: security upstream Forwarded: https://github.com/AOMediaCodec/libavif/pull/2769 X-Debbugs-Cc: car...@debian.org, Debian Security Team Hi, The following vulnerability was published for libavif. CVE-2025-48175[0]: | In libavif before 1.3.0, av

Bug#1103715: marked as done (mtail: FTBFS on amd64: test failures)

Your message dated Fri, 16 May 2025 16:00:19 +0100 with message-id <256e51b9-5984-4b36-8232-296f94d83...@tina.pm> and subject line Re: Bug#1103715: mtail: FTBFS on amd64: test failures has caused the Debian Bug report #1103715, regarding mtail: FTBFS on amd64: test failures to be marked as done. T

Bug#1105191: screen: TTY Hijacking while Attaching to a Multi-User Session (CVE-2025-46802)

Hi I'm not sure the grave severity is warranted here as in Debian we do not install screen setuid (though there is an opt-in to do it). In any case for the recent CVEs, WIP MR is at: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/screen/-/merge_requests/1 Regards, Salvatore

Bug#1103715: mtail: FTBFS on amd64: test failures

Hi Chris, Thanks for reporting this. Sadly, I cannot understand the problem.. The buildds keep failing to build the package, but I have rebuilt it many times on a clean chroot both in my computer and in a porterbox, and even ran the failing test in a loop hundreds of times.. But I cannot repr

Processed: forcemerge

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > affects 807168 buildd.debian.org Bug #807168 [src:debian-installer-netboot-images] debian-installer-netboot-images: required resources not declared as build-dependencies (fetches via network) Added indication that 807168 affects buildd.debian.or

Bug#1102322: marked as done (android-udev-rules ineffectively Replaces android-sdk-platform-tools-common due to the /usr-move transition (DEP17 P1))

Your message dated Fri, 16 May 2025 15:36:21 +0200 with message-id and subject line Closing already fixed bugs has caused the Debian Bug report #1102322, regarding android-udev-rules ineffectively Replaces android-sdk-platform-tools-common due to the /usr-move transition (DEP17 P1) to be marked a

Bug#1102442: marked as done (android-udev-rules has an undeclared file conflict on /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/51-android.rules)

Your message dated Fri, 16 May 2025 15:36:21 +0200 with message-id and subject line Closing already fixed bugs has caused the Debian Bug report #1102442, regarding android-udev-rules has an undeclared file conflict on /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/51-android.rules to be marked as done. This means that y

Bug#1105051: imagemagick breaks xplanet autopkgtest: test_compare_images() returned non-zero return code

Hi Bastien, * Bastien Roucaries [2025-05-16 14:53]: Le vendredi 16 mai 2025, 13:31:55 heure d’été d’Europe centrale Jochen Sprickerhof a écrit : Hi, * Paul Gevers [2025-05-10 14:24]: >With a recent upload of imagemagick the autopkgtest of xplanet fails >in testing when that autopkgtest is ru

Bug#1105051: imagemagick breaks xplanet autopkgtest: test_compare_images() returned non-zero return code

Le vendredi 16 mai 2025, 13:31:55 heure d’été d’Europe centrale Jochen Sprickerhof a écrit : > Hi, > > * Paul Gevers [2025-05-10 14:24]: > >With a recent upload of imagemagick the autopkgtest of xplanet fails > >in testing when that autopkgtest is run with the binary packages of > >imagemagick f

Bug#1105832: Followup question on CVE-2024-27982

Hi Jérémy, On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 08:54:47AM +0200, Jérémy Lal wrote: > Le ven. 16 mai 2025 à 08:00, Salvatore Bonaccorso a > écrit : > > > Hi Jeremy, > > > > On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 10:50:34PM +0200, Jérémy Lal wrote: > > > Also https://nodejs.org/en/blog/release/v20.19.2/ > > > mentions > > >

Processed: found 1104554 in 4.6.1-1, tagging 1104554

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 1104554 4.6.1-1 Bug #1104554 [weechat] upgrade to version 4.6.3, fixes 7 security vulnerabilities Marked as found in versions weechat/4.6.1-1. > tags 1104554 + upstream fixed-upstream Bug #1104554 [weechat] upgrade to version 4.6.3, fixes 7

Processed: metadata

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > affects 1104835 = src:edbrowse Bug #1104835 [quickjs] edbrowse: FTBFS: jseng-quick.c:1493:34: error: implicit declaration of function ‘JS_VALUE_GET_OBJ’ Removed indication that 1104835 affects edbrowse Added indication that 1104835 affects sr

Bug#1103077: marked as done (xphyle: FTBFS in testing/i386: EOFError: pigz process returned non-zero exit code 1)

Your message dated Fri, 16 May 2025 13:59:11 +0200 with message-id and subject line xphyle: FTBFS in testing/i386: EOFError: pigz process returned non-zero exit code 1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1103077, regarding xphyle: FTBFS in testing/i386: EOFError: pigz process returned non-zero ex

Bug#1105051: imagemagick breaks xplanet autopkgtest: test_compare_images() returned non-zero return code

Hi! Thanks for checking and all the updates. There would also be option c) dropping the compare tests. I'm honestly not sure if the compare tests are worth the effort. And xplanet would still have the file type tests. Best regards, Alexander > Jochen Sprickerhof hat am 16.05.2025 13:31 CES

Bug#1105051: imagemagick breaks xplanet autopkgtest: test_compare_images() returned non-zero return code

Hi, * Paul Gevers [2025-05-10 14:24]: With a recent upload of imagemagick the autopkgtest of xplanet fails in testing when that autopkgtest is run with the binary packages of imagemagick from unstable. It passes when run with only packages from testing. In tabular form:

Processed: tagging 1104554

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1104554 + security Bug #1104554 [weechat] upgrade to version 4.6.3, fixes 7 security vulnerabilities Added tag(s) security. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1104554: https://bugs.debian.org/cg

Bug#1103099: marked as done (sklearn-pandas: FTBFS in testing/i386: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p 3.13 returned exit code 13)

Your message dated Fri, 16 May 2025 10:49:05 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1103099: fixed in sklearn-pandas 2.2.0-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #1103099, regarding sklearn-pandas: FTBFS in testing/i386: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p 3.13

Processed: libsoup3 (and libsoup2) autopkgtests are flaky: Address already in use: AH00072: make_sock: could not bind to address 127.0.0.1:47524

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 1035983 3.6.5-1 Bug #1035983 [src:libsoup3] libsoup3 (and libsoup2) autopkgtests are flaky: Address already in use: AH00072: make_sock: could not bind to address 127.0.0.1:47524 Marked as found in versions libsoup3/3.6.5-1. > tags 1035983

Bug#1035983: libsoup3 (and libsoup2) autopkgtests are flaky: Address already in use: AH00072: make_sock: could not bind to address 127.0.0.1:47524

found 1035983 3.6.5-1 tags 1035983 ftbfs thanks Hi. For some reason the BTS thinks this is only a problem in stable. The above is my attempt at fixing that. I'm also tagging the bug as ftbfs because I'm getting build failures due to failing tests. Regarding the flakiness itself, I get a failure

Processed: RFS: duckdb/1.2.2-1 [ITP] -- In-process SQL OLAP database management system

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 1036922 by 1104302 Bug #1036922 [wnpp] ITP: duckdb -- fast, in-process analytical database 1036922 was not blocked by any bugs. 1036922 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 1036922: 1104302 > block 1078353 by 1103390 Bug #1078

Bug#1103098: rust-x509-parser: FTBFS in testing/i386: dh_auto_test: error: /usr/share/dh-rust/bin/cargo test returned exit code 101

Control: tags -1 patch I am uploading a NMU to fix this. The debdiff is attached. diff -Nru rust-x509-parser-0.17.0/debian/changelog rust-x509-parser-0.17.0/debian/changelog --- rust-x509-parser-0.17.0/debian/changelog2025-03-10 20:11:28.0 +0100 +++ rust-x509-parser-0.17.0/debian/cha

Processed: rust-x509-parser: FTBFS in testing/i386: dh_auto_test: error: /usr/share/dh-rust/bin/cargo test returned exit code 101

Processing control commands: > tags -1 patch Bug #1103098 [src:rust-x509-parser] rust-x509-parser: FTBFS in testing/i386: dh_auto_test: error: /usr/share/dh-rust/bin/cargo test returned exit code 101 Added tag(s) patch. -- 1103098: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1103098 Debia

Processed: tagging 1104844

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1104844 + confirmed Bug #1104844 [src:plasma-discover] plasma-discover: FTBFS: /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt6/snapd-qt-2/Snapd/enums.h:15:10: fatal error: snapdqt_global.h: No such file or directory Added tag(s) confirmed. > thanks Stopp

Bug#1103375: libkolabxml: FTBFS in testing/armel: make[3]: *** [CMakeFiles/generate_bindings.dir/build.make:89: bindings/kolabformat.cxx] Error 132

Control: tags -1 unreproducible I cannot reproduce this on armel.

Processed: libkolabxml: FTBFS in testing/armel: make[3]: *** [CMakeFiles/generate_bindings.dir/build.make:89: bindings/kolabformat.cxx] Error 132

Processing control commands: > tags -1 unreproducible Bug #1103375 [src:libkolabxml] libkolabxml: FTBFS in testing/armel: make[3]: *** [CMakeFiles/generate_bindings.dir/build.make:89: bindings/kolabformat.cxx] Error 132 Added tag(s) unreproducible. -- 1103375: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/b

Bug#1104602: megapixels gui fails because gtk4 dropped support for GLES 2.0

Control: severity 1104602 wishlist Control: reassign 1104602 gtk4 Control: affects 1104602 megapixels Hi, Le 13/05/2025 à 15:35, Boud Roukema a écrit : However, I don't see any Debian package for Megapixels-2.0. What we have is Megapixels-1.* : FWIW Megapixels v2.0 has not been released yet (

Processed: Re: Bug#1104602: megapixels gui fails because gtk4 dropped support for GLES 2.0

Processing control commands: > severity 1104602 wishlist Bug #1104602 [megapixels] megapixels gui fails because gtk4 dropped support for GLES 2.0 Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'grave' > reassign 1104602 gtk4 Bug #1104602 [megapixels] megapixels gui fails because gtk4 dropped support for GLES 2