Bug#1103207: marked as done (stdeb: FTBFS: help2man: can't get `--help' info from /<>/debian/python3-stdeb/usr/bin/py2dsc)

2025-04-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Apr 2025 04:49:28 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1103207: fixed in stdeb 0.10.0-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #1103207, regarding stdeb: FTBFS: help2man: can't get `--help' info from /<>/debian/python3-stdeb/usr/bin/py2dsc to be marked as done. This me

Bug#1103495: python-aioraven: unsatisfiable build-dependency on python3-iso4217

2025-04-17 Thread Ralf Treinen
Source: python-aioraven Version: 0.7.0-1 Severity: serious Hi, python-aioraven build-depends on python3-iso4217 which does not exist in the archive. -Ralf.

Bug#1103418: openssh-server irregularly crashing since 10.0p1 upgrade

2025-04-17 Thread Liam Stitt
On Thu, 17 Apr 2025, Colin Watson wrote: I got this far: * install the gdb and systemd-coredump packages Whereupon I discovered that, obviously enough, it's also necessary to restart the sshd service. You may want to make note of that if these are canned instructions. This minor speedbum

Bug#1103191: marked as done (importlab: FTBFS: help2man: can't get `--help' info from debian/python3-importlab/usr/bin/importlab)

2025-04-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Apr 2025 05:04:46 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1103191: fixed in importlab 0.8.1-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1103191, regarding importlab: FTBFS: help2man: can't get `--help' info from debian/python3-importlab/usr/bin/importlab to be marked as done

Bug#1103191: importlab: FTBFS: help2man: can't get `--help' info from debian/python3-importlab/usr/bin/importlab

2025-04-17 Thread Sergio Durigan Junior
user debian-rele...@lists.debian.org usertags 1103191 + bsp-2025-04-brazil thanks On Monday, April 14 2025, Santiago Vila wrote: > Dear maintainer: > > During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build: Yet another one similar to #1103207 (and caused by/related to #11031

Bug#1103191: marked as pending in importlab

2025-04-17 Thread Sergio Durigan Junior
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1103191 in importlab reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/importlab/-/commit/53cd76986660db8

Processed: Bug#1103191 marked as pending in importlab

2025-04-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1103191 [src:importlab] importlab: FTBFS: help2man: can't get `--help' info from debian/python3-importlab/usr/bin/importlab Added tag(s) pending. -- 1103191: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1103191 Debian Bug Tracking System C

Processed: Bug#1103227 marked as pending in r-bioc-grohmm

2025-04-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1103227 [src:r-bioc-grohmm] r-bioc-grohmm: FTBFS: DecayAlgorithm.c:94:15: error: expected identifier or '(' before 'false' Added tag(s) pending. -- 1103227: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1103227 Debian Bug Tracking System Co

Bug#1103227: marked as pending in r-bioc-grohmm

2025-04-17 Thread Charles Plessy
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1103227 in r-bioc-grohmm reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/r-pkg-team/r-bioc-grohmm/-/commit/4054e62028b49ba19

Bug#1103207: stdeb: FTBFS: help2man: can't get `--help' info from /<>/debian/python3-stdeb/usr/bin/py2dsc

2025-04-17 Thread Sergio Durigan Junior
user debian-rele...@lists.debian.org usertags 1103207 + bsp-2025-04-brazil thanks On Monday, April 14 2025, Santiago Vila wrote: > Dear maintainer: > > During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build: This is happening because of https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrepo

Processed: libchardet: diff for NMU version 1.0.4-1.2

2025-04-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags 1102359 + patch Bug #1102359 [src:libchardet] libchardet: Wrong BSD-3-clause license Added tag(s) patch. > tags 1102359 + pending Bug #1102359 [src:libchardet] libchardet: Wrong BSD-3-clause license Added tag(s) pending. -- 1102359: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi

Processed: forcibly merging 1103408 1102626

2025-04-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forcemerge 1103408 1102626 Bug #1103408 [isc-dhcp-client] isc-dhcp-client: Obsolete sbin.dhclient apparmor profile not (re)moved Bug #1102626 [isc-dhcp-client] isc-dhcp-client: obsolete conffile left behind Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'

Bug#1102626: marked as done (isc-dhcp-client: obsolete conffile left behind)

2025-04-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Apr 2025 02:34:07 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1102626: fixed in isc-dhcp 4.4.3-P1-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #1102626, regarding isc-dhcp-client: obsolete conffile left behind to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has be

Bug#1103408: marked as done (isc-dhcp-client: Obsolete sbin.dhclient apparmor profile not (re)moved)

2025-04-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Apr 2025 02:34:07 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1102626: fixed in isc-dhcp 4.4.3-P1-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #1102626, regarding isc-dhcp-client: Obsolete sbin.dhclient apparmor profile not (re)moved to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#1103468: dicod doesn't start properly.

2025-04-17 Thread Karine Crévecœur
Package: dicod Version: 2.12-2 Severity: grave Hi, Dicod cannot start since version 2.12-1. Starting dicod with: $ dicod --stderr It printed: dicod: Error: /etc/dicod.conf:16.1-39: invalid include statement So, I change the line 16 from: #include /var/lib/dicod/dictorg-db.list to: #i

Bug#1103227: [PATCH] Backport for fixing FTBFS error

2025-04-17 Thread liwenjun
can you propose a patch based on the upstream commit? Do you have write access to our Salsa repositories? Hi, Charles: I had been test on local chroot, then found that needs another commit on upstream. I start a PR on Salsa repositories, please check it. PR:backport for fixing FTBFS error (!

Bug#1103420: [Pkg-electronics-devel] Bug#1103420: src:sch-rnd: fails to migrate to testing for too long

2025-04-17 Thread Bdale Garbee
Paul Gevers writes: > This bug report has been automatically generated and has only been sent > manually. If you have any comments with regards to the content or the > process, please reach out to me. I assumed that the closure of #1101065 would allow sch-rnd to be promoted to testing, since t

Bug#1082040: Installs ndpi.lua file in root

2025-04-17 Thread Jochen Sprickerhof
Control: found -1 Hi, looks like the dependency was added in git: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/wireshark/-/commit/d6b76745bfae4de957aeed5f06b0a6042ec30232 But not in the uploaded package: https://sources.debian.org/src/wireshark/4.4.6-1/debian/control/#L212 I guess that the control file w

Bug#1103345: Affected packages

2025-04-17 Thread Chris Sutcliff
Hello, I can see on the repos the new release of the go compiler complete with fix, is there a mechanism in place to trigger a re-compilation of the affected packages? If not this recompilation should be manually triggered to benefit from the fix. I asked as a docker.io user but other packages

Bug#1102441: marked as done (wireshark: build changes when rebuilt in trixie-security)

2025-04-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 17 Apr 2025 08:37:11 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1102441: fixed in wireshark 4.4.6-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1102441, regarding wireshark: build changes when rebuilt in trixie-security to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the proble

Bug#1102359: libchardet: diff for NMU version 1.0.4-1.2

2025-04-17 Thread Boyuan Yang
Control: tags 1102359 + patch Control: tags 1102359 + pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for libchardet (versioned as 1.0.4-1.2) and uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I should cancel it. Regards. diffstat for libchardet-1.0.4 libchardet-1.0.4 changelog |

Bug#1082040: marked as done (libwireshark-dev: Missing dependency on libgio-2.0-dev)

2025-04-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 17 Apr 2025 21:50:26 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1082040: fixed in wireshark 4.4.6-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1082040, regarding libwireshark-dev: Missing dependency on libgio-2.0-dev to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Processed: Re: Bug#1103010: nfs-ganesha: FTBFS in testing/arm64: dh_installman: error: Cannot find (any matches for) "src/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/doc/ganesha-top.8" (tried in .)

2025-04-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 important Bug #1103010 [src:nfs-ganesha] nfs-ganesha: FTBFS in testing/arm64: dh_installman: error: Cannot find (any matches for) "src/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/doc/ganesha-top.8" (tried in .) Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' > retitle -1 nfs-ganes

Bug#1103010: nfs-ganesha: FTBFS in testing/arm64: dh_installman: error: Cannot find (any matches for) "src/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/doc/ganesha-top.8" (tried in .)

2025-04-17 Thread Adrian Bunk
Control: severity -1 important Control: retitle -1 nfs-ganesha: binary-all FTBFS on !amd64 On Sun, Apr 13, 2025 at 06:36:38PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Source: nfs-ganesha > Version: 6.5-3 > Severity: serious > Justification: FTBFS > Tags: trixie sid ftbfs > User: lu...@debian.org > Usertags:

Bug#1078608: apt update silently leaves old index data

2025-04-17 Thread David Kalnischkies
Am Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 11:23:03AM +0200, schrieb Laurent Bigonville: > On Tue, 13 Aug 2024 19:57:58 +0200 Sven Bartscher > wrote: > > for a while I've been having the problem with `apt update` that it > > pretends to complete successfully, but it didn't actually pull updated > > index data. I run

Processed: Re: Bug#1082040: Installs ndpi.lua file in root

2025-04-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > found -1 Bug #1082040 {Done: Balint Reczey } [libwireshark-dev] libwireshark-dev: Missing dependency on libgio-2.0-dev No longer marked as fixed in versions wireshark/4.4.6-1 and reopened. -- 1082040: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1082040 Debia

Bug#1102889: linux-image-6.1.0-33-amd64: KVM GPU passthrough broken

2025-04-17 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi, For those following these bugs: A patch is now submitted upstream at https://lore.kernel.org/stable/20250416202441.3911142-1-alex.william...@redhat.com/ and we are waiting that it get accepted for beeing queued for 6.1.y. Thanks again to Milan for doing the bisection work and testing. Regard

Bug#1102440: marked as done (xrt FTBFS in trixie: compilation failure due to lack of -Wno-error=mismatched-new-delete)

2025-04-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 17 Apr 2025 19:52:13 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1102440: fixed in xrt 202210.2.13.466+dfsg-8.2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1102440, regarding xrt FTBFS in trixie: compilation failure due to lack of -Wno-error=mismatched-new-delete to be marked as done

Bug#1033857: ruby-chromedriver-helper: autopkgtest regression: cannot load such file -- zip (LoadError)

2025-04-17 Thread Bastian Germann
Control: reassign -1 src:ruby-chromedriver-helper Control: tags -1 patch This is not a problem of ruby-selenium-webdriver. In fact, the ruby-chromedriver-helper README points out that gem "selenium-webdriver" needs to be loaded before gem "chromedriver-helper". Patch attached. diff -Nru ruby-chrom

Bug#1103457: Unable to boot LUKS-encrypted system

2025-04-17 Thread Aaron Rainbolt
Package: dracut Version: 106-5 Severity: critical X-Debbugs-Cc: adrela...@whonix.org, arraybo...@ubuntu.com Unsure if the chosen severity is appropriate, but this bug renders affected systems unbootable and the recovery procedure is a serious headache, so I think this counts as "breaking the whole

Bug#1087869: marked as done (rocm-hipamd: autopkgtest regression due to new CMake deprecation warning)

2025-04-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 17 Apr 2025 18:50:05 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1087869: fixed in rocm-hipamd 5.7.1-5.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1087869, regarding rocm-hipamd: autopkgtest regression due to new CMake deprecation warning to be marked as done. This means that you

Processed: closing 1103442

2025-04-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > close 1103442 1:27.3.3+dfsg-1 Bug #1103442 [src:erlang] erlang: CVE-2025-32433 Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1103442 to the same values previously set Bug #1103442 [src:erlang] erlang: CVE-2025-32433 Marked Bug as done > thanks

Bug#1103442: closing 1103442

2025-04-17 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
close 1103442 1:27.3.3+dfsg-1 thanks

Bug#1103442: erlang: CVE-2025-32433

2025-04-17 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Source: erlang Version: 1:25.2.3+dfsg-1 Severity: grave Tags: security upstream fixed-upstream Justification: user security hole X-Debbugs-Cc: car...@debian.org, Debian Security Team Control: found -1 1:27.3.2+dfsg-1 Control: fixed -1 1:27.3.3+dfsg-1 Hi, The following vulnerability was published

Processed: erlang: CVE-2025-32433

2025-04-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > found -1 1:27.3.2+dfsg-1 Bug #1103442 [src:erlang] erlang: CVE-2025-32433 Marked as found in versions erlang/1:27.3.2+dfsg-1. > fixed -1 1:27.3.3+dfsg-1 Bug #1103442 [src:erlang] erlang: CVE-2025-32433 Marked as fixed in versions erlang/1:27.3.3+dfsg-1. -- 1103442:

Bug#1098319: grub2 CVEs in stable

2025-04-17 Thread Sylvain Beucler
Hello Julian, Thanks for the fast answer, I added a note in security-tracker:data/dla-needed.txt stating that we'll wait until the next PU. Cheers! Sylvain Beucler Debian LTS Team

Bug#1089433: shim-helpers-arm64-signed: Supporting rootless builds by default

2025-04-17 Thread Steve McIntyre
control: tags -1 +pending Hsy guys, Sorry, I've not been updating bugs here enough to share progress. I've had changes for this ready for some time, just not pushed yet. The shim 16.0 release has already happened upstream, and it passes CI for me locally. *However*, we're waiting on a bugfix f

Bug#1098319: grub2 CVEs in stable

2025-04-17 Thread Julian Andres Klode
On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 03:25:33PM +0200, Sylvain Beucler wrote: > Hi, > > I'm part of the Debian LTS Team and checking on our grub2 status. > > Are there any plans to work on a bullseye update? > (asking because grub2 maintainers have done so in the past, and because > grub2 is listed at lts-do-

Bug#1103373: rjava: FTBFS in testing/armel: configure: error: One or more Java configuration variables are not set.

2025-04-17 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 17 April 2025 at 17:55, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: | On 17/04/25 at 10:40 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > | > On 17 April 2025 at 09:33, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > | | > | On 17 April 2025 at 15:43, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: | > | | On 17/04/25 at 08:27 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > | | >

Bug#1094561: ruby-vcr: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby3.3" failed: cannot load such file -- rack/handler/webrick

2025-04-17 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Fri, 11 Apr 2025 14:24:34 +0200 Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > On 05/04/25 at 18:51 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > VCR needs to be updated to support rack 3 / rackup. > > > > However, we are stuck with version 5 of VCR, since more recent versions > > switched to a non-free license (see #984689), an

Processed: Re: Bug#1092205: shim still b-d's on GCC 12, which should not be part of the trixie release

2025-04-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 +pending Bug #1092205 [src:shim] shim still b-d's on GCC 12, which should not be part of the trixie release Added tag(s) pending. -- 1092205: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1092205 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org

Bug#1092205: shim still b-d's on GCC 12, which should not be part of the trixie release

2025-04-17 Thread Steve McIntyre
control: tags -1 +pending Hsy guys, Sorry, I've not been updating bugs here enough to share progress. I've had changes for this ready for some time, just not pushed yet. The shim 16.0 release has already happened upstream, and it passes CI for me locally. *However*, we're waiting on a bugfix f

Bug#1103418: openssh-server irregularly crashing since 10.0p1 upgrade

2025-04-17 Thread Colin Watson
On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 04:24:18AM -0600, Liam Stitt wrote: Hi. Since 10.0p1 came out, about half the time I try to connect to my system it fails and on inspection there is a crash in the dmesg output: [419972.562415] sshd-session[189732]: segfault at 7ffceb533dbc ip 7ff7dc95261d sp 7ff

Bug#1103373: rjava: FTBFS in testing/armel: configure: error: One or more Java configuration variables are not set.

2025-04-17 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 17/04/25 at 10:40 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > > On 17 April 2025 at 09:33, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > | > | On 17 April 2025 at 15:43, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > | | On 17/04/25 at 08:27 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > | | > Coincidentally got a patch via the BTS to fix how R (ie r-base-c

Processed: Re: Bug#1089433: shim-helpers-arm64-signed: Supporting rootless builds by default

2025-04-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 +pending Bug #1089433 [src:shim] shim-helpers-@arch@-signed: Supporting rootless builds by default Added tag(s) pending. -- 1089433: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1089433 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with pro

Bug#1103373: rjava: FTBFS in testing/armel: configure: error: One or more Java configuration variables are not set.

2025-04-17 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 17 April 2025 at 09:33, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | | On 17 April 2025 at 15:43, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: | | On 17/04/25 at 08:27 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | | > Coincidentally got a patch via the BTS to fix how R (ie r-base-core) | | > configures Java on loong64, but this may help the oth

Processed: Re: Bug#1100677: Pending autoremoval of debian-reference* packages

2025-04-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 important Bug #1100677 [debian-reference-de,debian-reference-en,debian-reference-es,debian-reference-fr,debian-reference-id,debian-reference-it,debian-reference-ja,debian-reference-pt,debian-reference-pt-br,debian-reference-zh-cn,debian-reference-zh-tw]

Bug#1102626: isc-dhcp-client: obsolete conffile left behind

2025-04-17 Thread Santiago Ruano Rincón
Control: tag -1 + pending El 11/04/25 a las 10:05, Sven Joachim escribió: > Package: isc-dhcp-client > Version: 4.4.3-P1-6 > > Along with the fix for #1055067, the apparmor file was renamed from > sbin.dhclient to usr.sbin.dhclient, but the old file remains on the > system after upgrades. [...]

Bug#1103345: marked as done (golang-1.24-go: vgetrandom cleanup causes SIGSEGVs in programs using Go)

2025-04-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 17 Apr 2025 15:08:02 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1103345: fixed in golang-1.24 1.24.2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1103345, regarding golang-1.24-go: vgetrandom cleanup causes SIGSEGVs in programs using Go to be marked as done. This means that you cl

Processed: Bug#1103345 marked as pending in golang

2025-04-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1103345 [golang-1.24-go] golang-1.24-go: vgetrandom cleanup causes SIGSEGVs in programs using Go Added tag(s) pending. -- 1103345: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1103345 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.or

Bug#1103373: rjava: FTBFS in testing/armel: configure: error: One or more Java configuration variables are not set.

2025-04-17 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 17 April 2025 at 15:43, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: | On 17/04/25 at 08:27 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > Coincidentally got a patch via the BTS to fix how R (ie r-base-core) | > configures Java on loong64, but this may help the others too. [1] | > | > The new r-base package is building. Is th

Bug#1092436: hyprpaper: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: libwlroots-dev

2025-04-17 Thread Bastian Germann
Control: tags -1 patch I am uploading a NMU to DELAYED/2 in order to fix this. Please find the debdiff attached. diff -Nru hyprpaper-0.7.0/debian/changelog hyprpaper-0.7.0/debian/changelog --- hyprpaper-0.7.0/debian/changelog2024-03-08 20:01:08.0 +0100 +++ hyprpaper-0.7.0/debian/change

Processed: hyprpaper: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: libwlroots-dev

2025-04-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 patch Bug #1092436 [src:hyprpaper] hyprpaper: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: libwlroots-dev Added tag(s) patch. -- 1092436: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1092436 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with pr

Bug#1001661: can this be closed?

2025-04-17 Thread nick black
i believe that i've fixed this upstream. currently 3.0.13 looks good on all architectures, including s390x and all arms: https://ci.debian.net/packages/n/notcurses/ unless someone thinks otherwise, i'd like to close this as fixed in 3.0.13. signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#1092436: hyprpaper: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: libwlroots-dev

2025-04-17 Thread Bastian Germann
The package builds with libwlroots-0.18-dev as well.

Processed: Re: Bug#1102626: isc-dhcp-client: obsolete conffile left behind

2025-04-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 + pending Bug #1102626 [isc-dhcp-client] isc-dhcp-client: obsolete conffile left behind Bug #1103408 [isc-dhcp-client] isc-dhcp-client: Obsolete sbin.dhclient apparmor profile not (re)moved Added tag(s) pending. Added tag(s) pending. -- 1102626: https://bug

Bug#1103359: marked as done (kicad: FTBFS in testing/arm64: ImportError: /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/wx/_core.cpython-313-aarch64-linux-gnu.so: undefined symbol: _ZN14wxTranslations27GetBestAvailab

2025-04-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 17 Apr 2025 09:37:25 -0400 (EDT) with message-id <69d8e2b1-001e-8f4e-89a9-1066da1a9...@techie.net> and subject line has caused the Debian Bug report #1103359, regarding kicad: FTBFS in testing/arm64: ImportError: /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/wx/_core.cpython-313-aarch64-

Bug#1100677: Pending autoremoval of debian-reference* packages

2025-04-17 Thread Osamu Aoki
Control: severity -1 important Control: tags -1 pending My latest salsa changes: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/debian-reference/-/commit/b6a1085647982f0e62e550338c3fbb6d3cc08d4c As I assessed, since this bug hits user using testing only, this is not serious bug per Policy. Excuse me for my ped

Bug#1103373: rjava: FTBFS in testing/armel: configure: error: One or more Java configuration variables are not set.

2025-04-17 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 17/04/25 at 08:27 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > > On 16 April 2025 at 15:35, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > | > | On 16 April 2025 at 22:13, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > | | On 16/04/25 at 14:51 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > | | > > | | > On 16 April 2025 at 21:27, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > | |

Processed: fixed 1102413 in 2.4.9.4-0+deb11u5

2025-04-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > fixed 1102413 2.4.9.4-0+deb11u5 Bug #1102413 [src:libapache2-mod-auth-openidc] libapache2-mod-auth-openidc: CVE-2025-31492 The source 'libapache2-mod-auth-openidc' and version '2.4.9.4-0+deb11u5' do not appear to match any binary packages Marked

Bug#1098319: grub2 CVEs in stable

2025-04-17 Thread Sylvain Beucler
Hi, I'm part of the Debian LTS Team and checking on our grub2 status. Are there any plans to work on a bullseye update? (asking because grub2 maintainers have done so in the past, and because grub2 is listed at lts-do-call-me:) https://salsa.debian.org/security-tracker-team/security-tracker/-/

Bug#1103373: rjava: FTBFS in testing/armel: configure: error: One or more Java configuration variables are not set.

2025-04-17 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 16 April 2025 at 15:35, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | | On 16 April 2025 at 22:13, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: | | On 16/04/25 at 14:51 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | | > | | > On 16 April 2025 at 21:27, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: | | > | Source: rjava | | > | Version: 1.0-11-1 | | > | Severity: seriou

Bug#1103385: marked as done (mysql-8.0: CVE-2025-30722 CVE-2025-30721 CVE-2025-30715 CVE-2025-30705 CVE-2025-30704 CVE-2025-30703 CVE-2025-30699 CVE-2025-30696 CVE-2025-30695 CVE-2025-30693 CVE-2025-3

2025-04-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 17 Apr 2025 13:24:35 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1103385: fixed in mysql-8.0 8.0.42-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1103385, regarding mysql-8.0: CVE-2025-30722 CVE-2025-30721 CVE-2025-30715 CVE-2025-30705 CVE-2025-30704 CVE-2025-30703 CVE-2025-30699 CVE

Processed: tagging 1102938

2025-04-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1102938 + pending Bug #1102938 [singularity-container] apptainer and singularity-container have an undeclared file conflict on /usr/bin/run-singularity and /usr/bin/singularity Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please

Bug#1100677: Pending autoremoval of debian-reference* packages

2025-04-17 Thread Osamu Aoki
Hi again, (dropping -devel) I see dpkg-maintscript-helper is already used to address Debian Bug report logs - #1058960 dpkg: warning: unable to delete old directory '/usr/share/debian-reference': Directory not empty https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1058960 https://salsa.debian

Bug#1094516: marked as done (ruby-rack-google-analytics: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby3.3" failed.)

2025-04-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 17 Apr 2025 11:37:21 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1103379: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1094516, regarding ruby-rack-google-analytics: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby3.3" failed. to be marked as done. This means that you claim t

Bug#1100677: Pending autoremoval of debian-reference* packages

2025-04-17 Thread Osamu Aoki
Hi, Following up on my previous post. > How about adding simpler versioned depends (no pre-depends) with pre-rm > script? I am talking about tricks using the "dpkg-maintscript-helper symlink_to_dir ..." command. Any thought? Osamu On Thu, 2025-04-17 at 20:40 +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote: > Hi, >

Bug#1095377: marked as done (ruby-active-model-serializers: FTBFS: failing tests)

2025-04-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 17 Apr 2025 11:36:40 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1103381: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1095377, regarding ruby-active-model-serializers: FTBFS: failing tests to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the probl

Bug#1095385: marked as done (ruby-responders: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby3.3" failed. Exiting.)

2025-04-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 17 Apr 2025 11:33:27 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1103410: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1095385, regarding ruby-responders: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby3.3" failed. Exiting. to be marked as done. This means that you claim tha

Bug#1095456: marked as done (ruby-responders: autopkgtest regression with ruby-rack 3)

2025-04-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 17 Apr 2025 11:33:27 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1103410: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1095456, regarding ruby-responders: autopkgtest regression with ruby-rack 3 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#1100304: marked as done (ruby-entypo-rails: FTBFS: Could not find 'railties' (>= 4.1, < 7) - did find: [railties-7.2.2.1] (Gem::MissingSpecVersionError))

2025-04-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 17 Apr 2025 11:42:54 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1094823: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1100304, regarding ruby-entypo-rails: FTBFS: Could not find 'railties' (>= 4.1, < 7) - did find: [railties-7.2.2.1] (Gem::MissingSpec

Bug#1094543: marked as done (ruby-omniauth-saml: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby3.3" failed: Failure/Error: require 'omniauth')

2025-04-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 17 Apr 2025 11:41:05 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1103364: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1094543, regarding ruby-omniauth-saml: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby3.3" failed: Failure/Error: require 'omniauth' to be marked as done.

Bug#1094819: marked as done (ruby-entypo-rails: Expected to find a manifest file in `app/assets/config/manifest.js`)

2025-04-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 17 Apr 2025 11:42:54 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1094823: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1094819, regarding ruby-entypo-rails: Expected to find a manifest file in `app/assets/config/manifest.js` to be marked as done. This

Bug#1103427: pymatgen: autopkgtest regression: exit code 5

2025-04-17 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: pymatgen Version: 2025.2.18+dfsg1-4 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: regression Dear maintainer(s), Your package has an autopkgtest, great. However, it fails in testing since very recently. Can you please investigate the situation and fix it? I copied some o

Bug#1103406: marked as done (ogdi-dfsg: flaky autopkgtest on arm64)

2025-04-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 17 Apr 2025 13:33:52 +0200 with message-id <56aca820-a2fd-441b-8097-fa8e74740...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#1103406: ogdi-dfsg: flaky autopkgtest on arm64 has caused the Debian Bug report #1103406, regarding ogdi-dfsg: flaky autopkgtest on arm64 to be marked as don

Bug#1100677: Pending autoremoval of debian-reference* packages

2025-04-17 Thread Osamu Aoki
Hi, I now see this as a bug. I think this was caused by my post-bookworm change in debian-reference (2.109) on Mon, 18 Dec 2023. If I remember correctly, the intent of this change was to move all HTML/PDF/Plain_Text document to a path under /usr/share/doc/ for better policy compliance. This r

Bug#1094846: marked as done (Rack::Lint::LintError: uppercase character in header name: Content-Type)

2025-04-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 17 Apr 2025 11:37:21 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1103379: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1094846, regarding Rack::Lint::LintError: uppercase character in header name: Content-Type to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#1102106: git ftbfs on s390x (test failures)

2025-04-17 Thread Bastian Blank
On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 12:46:08PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > > git ftbfs on s390x (test failures), there's no good summary on the build > > log: The failing test is: | expecting success of 5620.4 'do partial clone 2, backfill min batch size': | git clone --no-checkout --filter=blob:none

Bug#1084361: marked as done (ruby-fakeredis: FTBFS: Failure/Error: require 'redis/connection/registry')

2025-04-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 17 Apr 2025 11:36:03 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1103387: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1084361, regarding ruby-fakeredis: FTBFS: Failure/Error: require 'redis/connection/registry' to be marked as done. This means that y

Bug#1094518: marked as done (ruby-omniauth-ldap: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby3.3" failed: Failure/Error: require 'omniauth')

2025-04-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 17 Apr 2025 11:30:18 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1103414: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1094518, regarding ruby-omniauth-ldap: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby3.3" failed: Failure/Error: require 'omniauth' to be marked as done.

Bug#1103282: hwloc-contrib: FTBFS hwloc_type_sscanf: hwloc_type_sscanf.c:40: _check: Assertion `depth == (int) obj->depth' failed.

2025-04-17 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Andreas Beckmann, le mer. 16 avril 2025 04:35:58 +0200, a ecrit: > hwloc_type_sscanf: hwloc_type_sscanf.c:40: _check: Assertion `depth == (int) > obj->depth' failed. Divination told me that perhaps the attached patch could help? Samuel diff --git a/tests/hwloc/hwloc_type_sscanf.c b/tests

Bug#1094550: marked as done (ruby-inherited-resources: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby3.3" failed: :136:in `require': cannot load such

2025-04-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 17 Apr 2025 11:32:56 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1103409: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1094550, regarding ruby-inherited-resources: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby3.3" failed: :136:in `require': cannot load such file -- rack/s

Bug#1084366: marked as done (ruby-rollout: FTBFS: Failure/Error: require 'fakeredis')

2025-04-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 17 Apr 2025 11:34:26 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1103384: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1084366, regarding ruby-rollout: FTBFS: Failure/Error: require 'fakeredis' to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the p

Bug#1094566: marked as done (ruby-omniauth-openid: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby3.3" failed: Failure/Error: require 'omniauth')

2025-04-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 17 Apr 2025 11:30:47 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1103413: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1094566, regarding ruby-omniauth-openid: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby3.3" failed: Failure/Error: require 'omniauth' to be marked as done.

Bug#1094531: marked as done (ruby-omniauth-multipassword: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby3.3" failed: Failure/Error: require 'omniauth')

2025-04-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 17 Apr 2025 11:31:23 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1103412: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1094531, regarding ruby-omniauth-multipassword: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby3.3" failed: Failure/Error: require 'omniauth' to be marked a

Bug#1094542: marked as done (ruby-omniauth-kerberos: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby3.3" failed: Failure/Error: require 'omniauth')

2025-04-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 17 Apr 2025 11:31:55 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1103411: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1094542, regarding ruby-omniauth-kerberos: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby3.3" failed: Failure/Error: require 'omniauth' to be marked as don

Bug#1103275: marked as done (rust-sudo-rs: Autopkgtests fail on 32-bit architectures)

2025-04-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 17 Apr 2025 11:19:09 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1103275: fixed in rust-sudo-rs 0.2.5-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #1103275, regarding rust-sudo-rs: Autopkgtests fail on 32-bit architectures to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the prob

Bug#1103406: ogdi-dfsg: flaky autopkgtest on arm64

2025-04-17 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 4/17/25 12:53 PM, Paul Gevers wrote: On 17-04-2025 12:49, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: On 4/17/25 12:16 PM, Paul Gevers wrote: To avoid having to do this on the package side, I (ci.d.n maintainer hat on) could add your package to the ci.d.n reject_list That doesn't sound like a good idea

Processed: src:git: fails to migrate to testing for too long

2025-04-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > close -1 1:2.49.0-1 Bug #1103422 [src:git] src:git: fails to migrate to testing for too long Marked as fixed in versions git/1:2.49.0-1. Bug #1103422 [src:git] src:git: fails to migrate to testing for too long Marked Bug as done > block -1 by 1102106 Bug #1103422 {Do

Bug#1103406: ogdi-dfsg: flaky autopkgtest on arm64

2025-04-17 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi Bas, On 17-04-2025 10:53, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: Runner with unreliable network should not satisfy the needs-internet requirement. I agree with you on this, the problem is of course how to define unreliable network and where the border should be. I've made the wget and tar command

Bug#1103406: ogdi-dfsg: flaky autopkgtest on arm64

2025-04-17 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 4/17/25 12:16 PM, Paul Gevers wrote: Removing the autopkgtest or excluding unreliable architectures will be needed instead. I don't really want to do either, but nuking the autopkgtest from the package resolves this class of issues forever. Let's work together to improve the situation. I u

Bug#1103423: src:kitty: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on s390x

2025-04-17 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: kitty Version: 0.39.1-1 Severity: serious Control: close -1 0.40.0-1 Tags: sid trixie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: out-of-sync X-Debbugs-CC: debian-s...@lists.debian.org User: debian-s...@lists.debian.org Usertag: s390x Dear maintainer(s), The Release Team consi

Bug#1103422: src:git: fails to migrate to testing for too long

2025-04-17 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: git Version: 1:2.47.2-0.1 Severity: serious Control: close -1 1:2.49.0-1 Tags: sid trixie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: out-of-sync Control: block -1 by 1102106 Dear maintainer(s), The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing and unst

Processed: src:kitty: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on s390x

2025-04-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > close -1 0.40.0-1 Bug #1103423 [src:kitty] src:kitty: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on s390x Marked as fixed in versions kitty/0.40.0-1. Bug #1103423 [src:kitty] src:kitty: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on s390x Marked Bug as don

Bug#1102106: git ftbfs on s390x (test failures)

2025-04-17 Thread Paul Gevers
user debian-s...@lists.debian.org usertag 1102106 s390x thanks Dear s390x porters, Can you please have a look at bug 1102106? (Copied in full below for your convenience) Paul On Sat, 5 Apr 2025 07:20:13 +0200 Matthias Klose wrote: Package: src:git Version: 1:2.49.0-1 Severity: serious Tags

Bug#1103418: openssh-server irregularly crashing since 10.0p1 upgrade

2025-04-17 Thread Liam Stitt
Package: openssh-server Version: 1:10.0p1-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable X-Debbugs-Cc: sti...@cuug.ab.ca Hi. Since 10.0p1 came out, about half the time I try to connect to my system it fails and on inspection there is a crash in the dmesg output: [419972.562415] sshd-se

Processed: src:libfabric: fails to migrate to testing for too long

2025-04-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > close -1 2.1.0-1 Bug #1103421 [src:libfabric] src:libfabric: fails to migrate to testing for too long Marked as fixed in versions libfabric/2.1.0-1. Bug #1103421 [src:libfabric] src:libfabric: fails to migrate to testing for too long Marked Bug as done -- 1103421

Bug#1103421: src:libfabric: fails to migrate to testing for too long

2025-04-17 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: libfabric Version: 1.17.0-3.1 Severity: serious Control: close -1 2.1.0-1 Tags: sid trixie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: out-of-sync Dear maintainer(s), The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing and unstable for more than 30 days a

Bug#1103419: src:mpich: fails to migrate to testing for too long

2025-04-17 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: mpich Version: 4.2.1-5 Severity: serious Control: close -1 4.3.0-5 Tags: sid trixie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: out-of-sync Dear maintainer(s), The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing and unstable for more than 30 days as havin

Processed: src:sch-rnd: fails to migrate to testing for too long

2025-04-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > close -1 1.0.8-2 Bug #1103420 [src:sch-rnd] src:sch-rnd: fails to migrate to testing for too long Marked as fixed in versions sch-rnd/1.0.8-2. Bug #1103420 [src:sch-rnd] src:sch-rnd: fails to migrate to testing for too long Marked Bug as done -- 1103420: https://bu

  1   2   >