Your message dated Tue, 15 Apr 2025 06:49:37 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1102251: fixed in rust-sudo-rs 0.2.5-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1102251,
regarding rust-sudo-rs: failing autopkgtests
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi
Hi,
On Mon, 2025-04-14 at 16:18 -0500, Richard Laager wrote:
> On 2025-04-14 11:10, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > I do find it fairly hard to understand the logic behind a position that
> > somehow our git-remote-https binary as distributed is a derived work of
> > OpenSSL and thus violates the GPLv2 li
This is the same as bug #1094097.
The failed test output shows this error:
> munged: Error: Logfile is insecure: invalid ownership of "/tmp"
The preconditions for that error are here:
https://sources.debian.org/src/munge/0.5.16-1/src/munged/path.c/#L224
munged is checking for that directory t
Your message dated Tue, 15 Apr 2025 06:05:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1103017: fixed in spglib 2.6.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1103017,
regarding libspglib-f08-dev fails to coinstall
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Processing control commands:
> fixed -1 android-udev-rules/20250314+ds-4
Bug #1102442 [android-udev-rules] android-udev-rules has an undeclared file
conflict on /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/51-android.rules
The source android-udev-rules and version 20250314+ds-4 do not appear to match
any binary packag
control: fixed -1 20250314+ds-4
is this the same as #1102321?
looks very similar.
-Roger
Processing control commands:
> fixed -1 20250314+ds-4
Bug #1102322 [android-udev-rules] android-udev-rules ineffectively Replaces
android-sdk-platform-tools-common due to the /usr-move transition (DEP17 P1)
There is no source info for the package 'android-udev-rules' at version
'20250314+ds-4' w
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1099986 - pending patch
Bug #1099986 [src:cppcheck] cppcheck: autopkgtest regression on ppc64el:
Segmentation fault
Removed tag(s) pending and patch.
> severity 1099986 normal
Bug #1099986 [src:cppcheck] cppcheck: autopkgtest regression on p
tags 1099986 - pending patch
severity 1099986 normal
thanks
The patch has been applied in 2.17.1-2:
=
cppcheck (2.17.1-2) unstable; urgency=medium
* Disable autopkgtests on ppc64el, thanks to Michael Prokop (see #1099986).
=
Best regards,
Joachim
Your message dated Tue, 15 Apr 2025 05:49:06 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1102745: fixed in ntpsec 1.2.3+dfsg1-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #1102745,
regarding ntpsec: FTBFS on s390x: runtests: ../../libaes_siv/tests.c:80:
test_malloc_failure: Assertion `ret == 1' failed.
to b
Your message dated Tue, 15 Apr 2025 05:49:20 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1101679: fixed in r-cran-bslib 0.9.0+dfsg-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1101679,
regarding src:r-cran-bslib: fails to migrate to testing for too long
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
On 2025-04-14 20:39, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
Apologies, this was an oversight on my end. I've just pushed the branch
and the tag.
Thanks, Sergio!
Best wishes,
Andrius
Package: src:apertium-oci-fra
Version: 1.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs trixie sid
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules clean
dh clean
Package: src:mercurial
Version: 6.9.5-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs trixie sid
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules clean
dh clean --with
Your message dated Tue, 15 Apr 2025 00:19:01 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1087142: fixed in tl-parser 0.0.0+git20210107.1933e76f-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1087142,
regarding FTBFS: auto-static-fetch.c:50:13: error: ‘print_escaped_string’
defined but not used
to be marked a
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/jelmer/dirty-tracker-rs/issues/13
X-Debbugs-CC: jel...@debian.org
I used the BSP in Vienna to dig into this issue, but wasn't able to reproduce
the failure of the flaky test.
Found out that there is already a patch [0] that disables the flaky test on
x
Processing control commands:
> forwarded -1 https://github.com/jelmer/dirty-tracker-rs/issues/13
Bug #1102198 [src:rust-dirty-tracker] rust-dirty-tracker: flaky autopkgtest
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://github.com/jelmer/dirty-tracker-rs/issues/13'.
--
1102198: https://bugs.debian.or
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 1103011 qt6-pdf-dev
Bug #1103011 [src:skanpage] skanpage: FTBFS in testing/arm64: make: ***
[debian/rules:6: binary] Error 2
Bug reassigned from package 'src:skanpage' to 'qt6-pdf-dev'.
No longer marked as found in versions skanpage/24.1
Source: pyraf
Version: 2.2.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250414 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on i386.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/ru
Richard Laager writes:
> As I have said before: I think that computer programmers have a
> tendency to treat licenses as if they are self-executing (and precise
> like software).
Agreed, this is often a challenge when technical people discuss legal
matters, and it helps to keep this in mind.
>
close 1101623
thanks
Source: ltt-control
Version: 2.13.15-1
Severity: serious
Tags: FTBFS, patch
User: debian-ri...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: riscv64
Dear ltt-control maintainer,
The package ltt-control build failed on riscv.The crucial buildd log below:
```
make[4]: Entering directory
'/build/reproducible-path/ltt-
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 1101383 src:gir-to-d 0.23.3-1
Bug #1101383 [src:glib-d] glib-d: Fails to build with glib 2.84
Bug reassigned from package 'src:glib-d' to 'src:gir-to-d'.
No longer marked as found in versions glib-d/2.4.3-2.
Ignoring request to alter fixe
Package: src:rkward
Version: 0.8.0-4
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs trixie sid
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules clean
dh clean --with kf
Package: src:chromium
Version: 135.0.7049.84-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs trixie sid
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
[23872/53626] CXX
obj/third
---
Source: rl-renderpm
Version: 4.0.3+repack-7
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250414 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on i386.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Package: src:atlas-ecmwf
Version: 0.42.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs trixie sid
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
[ please see the full build log,
Package: src:ecmwflibs
Version: 2:0.6.3-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs trixie sid
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules clean
dh clean --bu
On 15 April 2025 at 00:19, Santiago Vila wrote:
| Package: src:rjava
| Version: 1.0-11-1
| Severity: serious
| Tags: ftbfs trixie sid
|
| Dear maintainer:
|
| During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
|
|
--
Package: src:r-cran-sdmtools
Version: 1.1-221.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs trixie sid
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules clean
dh cl
Package: src:img2pdf
Version: 0.6.0-3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs trixie sid
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules clean
dh clean --with p
Package: src:plip
Version: 2.4.0+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs trixie sid
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules clean
dh clean --buil
Package: src:ruby-pry-byebug
Version: 3.10.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs trixie sid
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules clean
dh clean
Package: src:r-bioc-grohmm
Version: 1.40.3-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs trixie sid
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules clean
dh clean -
Package: src:cdo
Version: 2.5.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs trixie sid
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules clean
dh clean --builddire
Package: src:foot
Version: 1.21.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs trixie sid
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
[148/161] cc -Iutils/xtgettcap.p -Iutil
Your message dated Mon, 14 Apr 2025 20:37:36 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1029043: fixed in adonthell 0.3.8-2.1+deb12u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1029043,
regarding AttributeError: module 'adonthell' has no attribute 'audio_load_wave'
to be marked as done.
This means that yo
Package: src:pympress
Version: 1.8.5-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs trixie sid
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules clean
dh clean --with
Package: src:importlab
Version: 0.8.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs trixie sid
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules clean
dh clean --with
Package: src:r-bioc-affxparser
Version: 1.78.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs trixie sid
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules clean
dh cle
Package: src:flatbuffers
Version: 23.5.26+dfsg-3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs trixie sid
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules clean
dh cle
Package: src:magics++
Version: 4.16.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs trixie sid
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
/usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux
Package: src:golang-github-smallstep-certificates
Version: 0.20.0-4
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs trixie sid
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian
Package: src:textdistance
Version: 4.6.3-4
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs trixie sid
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules clean
dh clean --b
Package: src:supysonic
Version: 0.7.9+ds-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs trixie sid
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules clean
dh clean --w
Package: src:symfony
Version: 6.4.20+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs trixie sid
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules clean
dh clean
Package: src:stdeb
Version: 0.10.0-3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs trixie sid
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules clean
rm -f py2dsc.1 pyp
Package: src:rjava
Version: 1.0-11-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs trixie sid
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules clean
dh clean --buildsy
Package: src:r-bioc-rtracklayer
Version: 1.66.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs trixie sid
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules clean
dh cl
Package: src:r-bioc-cner
Version: 1.42.0+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs trixie sid
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules clean
dh clea
Package: src:pcs
Version: 0.12.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs trixie sid
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules clean
dh clean --with pyth
Package: src:openhft-chronicle-wire
Version: 1.1.13-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs trixie sid
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules clean
d
Package: src:gpgme1.0
Version: 1.24.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs trixie sid
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules clean
dh clean --buil
Package: src:dssi
Version: 1.1.1~dfsg0-6
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs trixie sid
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules clean
dh clean
dh
Package: src:golang-github-keltia-archive
Version: 0.9.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs trixie sid
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules cl
Package: src:commonmark-bkrs
Version: 0.5.4+ds-7.1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs trixie sid
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules clean
dh c
Package: src:cairosvg
Version: 2.7.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs trixie sid
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules clean
dh clean --with
Package: src:clj-yaml-clojure
Version: 0.7.2-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs trixie sid
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules clean
dh clean
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1101383 [src:glib-d] glib-d: Fails to build with glib 2.84
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1101383: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1101383
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Hi everyone!
This turned out to be trickier to fix, the problem may not even be in
s-p but in some of the underlying libraries.
With this bug active, it looks like we may have to release trixie
without s-p, as it will miss the deadline today, and I need to spend
energy on PackageKit to support deb
Your message dated Mon, 14 Apr 2025 23:49:42 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1102209: fixed in matomo 5.3.1+dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1102209,
regarding matomo: flaky autopkgtest (mostly on i386):
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Mon, 14 Apr 2025 19:31:45 -0400
with message-id
and subject line Re: glib-d: Fails to build with glib 2.84
has caused the Debian Bug report #1101383,
regarding glib-d: Fails to build with glib 2.84
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Mon, 14 Apr 2025 19:16:05 -0400
with message-id
and subject line Re: glib-d: Fails to build with glib 2.84
has caused the Debian Bug report #1101383,
regarding glib-d: Fails to build with glib 2.84
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1101383 in glib-d reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/glib-d/-/commit/869769ab44f54f7e8a461a062555efa
Your message dated Mon, 14 Apr 2025 20:41:05 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1091520: fixed in phing 3.0.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1091520,
regarding There will be no further releases in the 2.x series
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has bee
Your message dated Mon, 14 Apr 2025 23:06:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1088285: fixed in software-properties 0.111-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1088285,
regarding software-properties REMOVED from testing since October 23, 2024
to be marked as done.
This means that you clai
Your message dated Mon, 14 Apr 2025 23:06:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1089720: fixed in software-properties 0.111-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1089720,
regarding software-properties-qt just crashes on start
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Mon, 14 Apr 2025 23:06:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1092693: fixed in software-properties 0.111-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1092693,
regarding software-properties-gtk: Does not start FileNotFoundError:
'/usr/bin/apt-key'
to be marked as done.
This mean
Source: libxmltok
Version: 1.2-4.2
Severity: serious
#691755 requests libxmltok to be removed from unstable, lets get it
out of testing first/too.
It's an old predecessor of expat.
Chris
On Mon, 14 Apr 2025 17:51:47 +0300, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
On a tanget to this bug: this package is maintained in Salsa, and the
original build failure is visible when CI runs in
https://salsa.debian.org/otto/mat2/-/pipelines/850962, and the fact
that the new change fixed the first issue but re
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1103137 in pydicom reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/pydicom/-/commit/58b37a8e5ba19932f28cac12dbd12d9
---
Source: pydicom
Version: 2.4.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250414 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on i386.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Your message dated Mon, 14 Apr 2025 21:51:15 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1103020: fixed in nfs-ganesha 6.5-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1103020,
regarding nfs-ganesha: wrong use of Multi-Arch
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #1103044 [mat2] mat2: unsatisfiable dependency on python2
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1103044: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1103044
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 + pending
Hi all,
On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 04:42:00PM +0300, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> Okay, I will NMU setuptools then, and then NMU mat2 with bumped dependency
> on setuptools.
After some discussion we decided that it's better to fix dh-python, not
setuptools, and Stefano upload
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1103137 [src:pydicom] pydicom: FTBFS in testing/i386: dh_auto_test: error:
pybuild --test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p 3.13 returned exit code 13
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1103137: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1103137
Your message dated Mon, 14 Apr 2025 21:17:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1022034: fixed in policyd-rate-limit 1.0.1.1-2.1+deb12u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1022034,
regarding policyd-rate-limit: Uses deprecated yaml.load
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
On 2025-04-14 11:10, Russ Allbery wrote:
I do find it fairly hard to understand the logic behind a position that
somehow our git-remote-https binary as distributed is a derived work of
OpenSSL and thus violates the GPLv2 license based on the nature of this
specific dependency chain, but then I wa
: 2.8.0+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250414 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on i386.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules binary
> dh
Control: severity -1 important
On Sunday, April 13, 2025 11:19:31 AM Mountain Standard Time Chris
Hofstaedtler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Oct 07, 2024 at 12:14:19PM -0400, Louis-Philippe Véronneau
wrote:
> > Source: qt6-webengine
> > Severity: important
> > User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
>
Your message dated Mon, 14 Apr 2025 21:04:48 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1103150: fixed in dh-python 6.20250414
has caused the Debian Bug report #1103150,
regarding python3-setuptools: Generates #!python shebangs, which dh_python3
considers as Python 2
to be marked as done.
This m
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 1100967 golang-step-crypto-dev
Bug #1100967 [golang-step-crypto-dev,golang-github-smallstep-crypto-dev]
golang-step-crypto-dev and golang-github-smallstep-crypto-dev have undeclared
file conflicts
Bug reassigned from package
'golang-st
On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 05:45:48PM +0100, Andrew Bower wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 04:28:36PM +0200, Andras Korn wrote:
> > During a dist-upgrade, the getty-run package was pulled in, and a(n
> > IMO misleadingly named) getty-ttyS0 service enabled by default.
>
> IMO the system should not st
Control: tags -1 fixed-upstream
Please note that Yadd's debdiff is based on a patch that was rejected.
The final solution was just released with the new upstream version 2.4.5:
https://github.com/FastCGI-Archives/fcgi2/commit/b0eabcaf4d4f371514891a52115c746815c2ff15
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> affects 1100967 golang-github-smallstep-crypto-dev
Bug #1100967 [golang-step-crypto-dev] golang-step-crypto-dev and
golang-github-smallstep-crypto-dev have undeclared file conflicts
Added indication that 1100967 affects golang-github-smallstep-cr
Your message dated Mon, 14 Apr 2025 16:47:23 -0400
with message-id
and subject line Lifting block
has caused the Debian Bug report #1102893,
regarding fltk1.3: fake RC bug to delay migration until fltk1.4 is ready
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit
Your message dated Mon, 14 Apr 2025 20:45:38 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1102251: fixed in rust-sudo-rs 0.2.5-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1102251,
regarding rust-sudo-rs: failing autopkgtests
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1103102 [src:python-pyglfw] python-pyglfw: FTBFS in testing/i386:
ImportError: Failed to load GLFW3 shared library.
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1103102: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1103102
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact o
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1103102 in python-pyglfw reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/python-pyglfw/-/commit/1f65065
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 1103150 dh-python
Bug #1103150 [python3-setuptools] python3-setuptools: Generates #!python
shebangs, which dh_python3 considers as Python 2
Bug reassigned from package 'python3-setuptools' to 'dh-python'.
No longer marked as found in ver
On 4/14/25 8:58 PM, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
As asked in #1102889 as well, would it be possible to get a full
kernel log as well please?
I cannot share log from this machine, but I just went through this and in the
moment
libvirt failed there is nothing logged...
I can see it only tried to
Hi Simon,
On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 05:23:01PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Loaders are expected to be able to recognise that a particular driver is not
> for them, and gracefully not load it. In practice this works fine, because all
> of our architectures can be distinguished by their ELF headers
On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 09:32:55PM +0200, Andras Korn wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 05:45:48PM +0100, Andrew Bower wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 04:28:36PM +0200, Andras Korn wrote:
> > > During a dist-upgrade, the getty-run package was pulled in, and a(n
> > > IMO misleadingly named) ge
Source: pysodium
Version: 0.7.18-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250414 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on i386.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> deb
Hi Chris,
It's a bit moot as the bug is already solved
On 13-04-2025 23:06, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> I think you are implying a finer detail that is lost on me.
Let me try again. The other bug is about valgrind Recommends a package
that doesn't exist. That's clearly RC, it can be fixed
The upstream patch applies cleanly on (old)stable.
Please find two debdiffs attached.
diff -Nru libfcgi-2.4.2/debian/changelog libfcgi-2.4.2/debian/changelog
--- libfcgi-2.4.2/debian/changelog 2020-01-01 00:00:01.0 +
+++ libfcgi-2.4.2/debian/changelog 2025-04-14 18:53:11.0
Your message dated Mon, 14 Apr 2025 19:05:59 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1092774: fixed in libfcgi 2.4.5-0.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1092774,
regarding libfcgi: CVE-2025-23016
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 02:01:07PM +0200, Milan Broz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we have the same issue with 6.1.133-1 (previous 6.1.129-1 works fine).
>
> We use passthrough of NVMe device, VM start now fails with
>
> qemu-system-x86_64: -device
> {"driver":"vfio-pci","host":":03:00.0","id":"hos
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 1102914 serious
Bug #1102914 [src:linux] VMs don't start up when being passed through a PCI
device
Bug #1102889 [src:linux] linux-image-6.1.0-33-amd64: KVM GPU passthrough broken
Bug #1103153 [src:linux] linux-image-6.1.0-33-amd64: kerne
On Mon, Apr 14, 2025, at 12:54 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Quoting Fabian Grünbichler (2025-04-12 16:13:42)
>> On Mon, Apr 7, 2025, at 9:37 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> > Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2025-04-07 09:29:04)
>> > Possibly the cause of this issue is that the Debian packaging carries a
1 - 100 of 268 matches
Mail list logo