On 2025-04-11 03:15:44 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 02:05:49AM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > > I've uploaded an NMU for python-xsdata (versioned as 24.1-1.1).
> > > The diff is attached to this message.
> >
> > Thanks but please don't make 0-day NMUs and follow the standar
Package: gpgv-udeb
Version: 2.4.7-13
Severity: serious
Tags: d-i
Justification: broken package
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-b...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
The upload of the 2.4.7 series to unstable just broke gpgv-udeb, which
bootstrap-base and net-retriever rely on:
Depends: libassuan9 (>= 3.0.2), libc6
Hi,
I believe the patch tag was inherited from #1061025 that has an
associated MR[1]. This is not a true solution, merely a workaround to
resolve the circular dependency causing this issue.
Best Regards,
Vladimir.
[1]
https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/libcommons-logging-java/-/merge_requests
Hi,
I tried to do some RC bug fixing to help the release and stumbled upon
#1060960. It is tagged patch and was forwarded upstream. But I can't
find anything like a patch. Is this tag valid in this case?
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
https://fam-tille.de
Your message dated Fri, 11 Apr 2025 06:35:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1102535: fixed in pynn 0.10.1-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #1102535,
regarding pynn: FTBFS: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'distutils'
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
On 4/10/25 18:00, Santiago Vila wrote:
El 10/4/25 a las 17:39, Santiago Vila escribió:
If you tried to build it once and failed, maybe it's just random.
Clarification: I meant "maybe it was only random before". I try hard
not to misreport "random ftbfs" bugs as "always ftbfs" bugs, but
I can a
Your message dated Fri, 11 Apr 2025 06:34:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1091543: fixed in danmaq 0.3.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1091543,
regarding danmaq: danmaQ crashes and fails to run
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit
Sorry!
I messed up and didn't notice that rust-is-macro was already packaged
independently, when I packaged the upstream source project that it is a
part of.
It is not correct that rust-is-macro is gone from unstable however:
https://packages.debian.org/source/unstable/rust-is-macro
In my unders
Your message dated Fri, 11 Apr 2025 06:19:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1092377: fixed in cppgir
2.0+git20240928.c8bb1c6+really2.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1092377,
regarding telegram-desktop: FTBFS: dbusinterface.hpp:170:3: error: lookup of
‘_check_member_conflict_get
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 important
Bug #1102256 [src:rust-hstr] rust-hstr: librust-is-macro-dev binary package is
also built by src rust-is-macro
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
--
1102256: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1102256
Debian Bug Trackin
Control: severity -1 important
Quoting Jeremy Bícha (2025-04-06 21:07:42)
> The source package rust-hstr builds the binary package
> librust-is-macro-dev for Architecture:all with version
> 0.3.7+0+20250106-2
>
> The source package rust-is-macro builds the binary package
> librust-is-macro-dev fo
Source: ruby-pry-byebug
Version: 3.10.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Does not install
X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian Ruby Team
, 1054...@bugs.debian.org
Hi,
$ sudo apt install ruby-pry-byebug
Solving dependencies... Error!
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested
Hello Adrian,
On Fri, 2025-04-11 at 02:09 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Control: tags -1 patch
>
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 02:48:21PM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Fri, 2024-11-29 at 14:28 +0100, Michael Prokop wrote:
> > > I'm not sure how relevant hfsutils is thos
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 1095276 4.1.3-2
Bug #1095276 [puppet-strings] puppet-strings: Please update to support yard
0.9.37
Bug #1098587 [puppet-strings] puppet-strings: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby3.3"
failed. Exiting.
Marked as fixed in versions puppet-strings/4.1.3
Your message dated Fri, 11 Apr 2025 02:37:24 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1102289: fixed in pcp 6.3.8-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1102289,
regarding src:pcp modifies debian/control during the build
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dea
Your message dated Fri, 11 Apr 2025 01:35:36 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1069715: fixed in rust-opendal 0.52.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1069715,
regarding librust-opendal-dev: package is impossible to install
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
Your message dated Fri, 11 Apr 2025 00:54:39 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1075534: fixed in spooles 2.2-14.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1075534,
regarding calculix-ccx: uninstallable since transition to openmpi version 5
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
Your message dated Fri, 11 Apr 2025 00:54:39 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1075534: fixed in spooles 2.2-14.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1075534,
regarding spooles: ftbfs with GCC-14
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Your message dated Fri, 11 Apr 2025 00:54:39 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1075534: fixed in spooles 2.2-14.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1075534,
regarding libspooles2.2t64: uninstallable since transition to openmpi version 5
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim tha
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1102613 [src:oci-seccomp-bpf-hook] oci-seccomp-bpf-hook: FTBFS due to
copyright-scan hack
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1102613: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1102613
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1102613 in oci-seccomp-bpf-hook reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/oci-seccomp-bpf-hook/-/comm
Dear maintainer,
I've uploaded an NMU for spooles (versioned as 2.2-14.2).
The diff is attached to this message.
cu
Adrian
diffstat for spooles-2.2 spooles-2.2
changelog |8
patches/gcc14.patch | 33 +
patches/series |1 +
rules
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 1089784 src:spooles
Bug #1089784 [calculix-ccx] calculix-ccx: uninstallable since transition to
openmpi version 5
Bug reassigned from package 'calculix-ccx' to 'src:spooles'.
No longer marked as found in versions calculix-ccx/2.21-1.
Ign
Source: oci-seccomp-bpf-hook
Version: 1.2.10+ds-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs sid trixie
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Hi
This package FTBFS with this diff:
-# Dpkg.Copyright.Grant.ByFile
Dpkg::Copyright::Grant::ByFile::_load_fill_blank_data No
On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 02:05:49AM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > I've uploaded an NMU for python-xsdata (versioned as 24.1-1.1).
> > The diff is attached to this message.
>
> Thanks but please don't make 0-day NMUs and follow the standard
> procedures for doing NMUs. Even delayed/1 would be bett
Package: src:golang-github-smallstep-scep
Version: 0.0~git20250318.a25cabb-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs trixie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-during-trixie-support-period
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable in the year 2028, your package
failed
Your message dated Fri, 11 Apr 2025 00:05:46 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1088876: fixed in python-xsdata 24.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1088876,
regarding Missing dependency on python3-ruff / ruff
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been d
I've uploaded an NMU for python-xsdata (versioned as 24.1-1.1).
The diff is attached to this message.
Thanks but please don't make 0-day NMUs and follow the standard
procedures for doing NMUs. Even delayed/1 would be better than this.
I've reuploaded this as a team upload versioned 24.1-2.
Tha
Processing control commands:
> reopen -1
Bug #1101599 {Done: Michael Tokarev } [qemu-system-x86]
qemu-system-x86_64 segfaults running ipxe selftests
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
Bug re
Package: mpich
Version: 4.3.0-5
Severity: serious
Justification: debci
I apologise for another serious bug, but mpich 4.3 is doing weird
things that we don't want in trixie. I see the problem in mpich test
errors in armci-mpi
(https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=armci-mpi&arch=amd64&ver
Your message dated Thu, 10 Apr 2025 23:49:21 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1088876: fixed in python-xsdata 24.1-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1088876,
regarding Missing dependency on python3-ruff / ruff
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Source: django-pipeline
Version: 4.0.0-3
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-Cc: Alexandre Detiste
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/django-pipeline
Issues preventing migration:
∙ ∙ autopkgtest for django-pipeline/4.0.0-3: amd64: Regression or new test ♻,
arm64: Regression or new test ♻, armel: Regression
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 1094924 https://github.com/scverse/anndata/pull/1726
Bug #1094924 [src:python-anndata] python-anndata compatibility with zarr3
Bug #1100261 [src:python-anndata] python-anndata: FTBFS: E AttributeError:
module 'zarr' has no attribute '
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 1100261 1094924
Bug #1100261 [src:python-anndata] python-anndata: FTBFS: E AttributeError:
module 'zarr' has no attribute 'DirectoryStore'
Bug #1100261 [src:python-anndata] python-anndata: FTBFS: E AttributeError:
module 'zarr' ha
Processing control commands:
> tags 1088876 + patch
Bug #1088876 [xsdata] Missing dependency on python3-ruff / ruff
Added tag(s) patch.
--
1088876: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1088876
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags 1088876 + patch
Dear maintainer,
I've uploaded an NMU for python-xsdata (versioned as 24.1-1.1).
The diff is attached to this message.
cu
Adrian
diffstat for python-xsdata-24.1 python-xsdata-24.1
changelog |8
control |1 +
tests/control |2 +-
3 fi
Your message dated Thu, 10 Apr 2025 23:20:06 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1075557: fixed in tcpxtract 1.0.1-18.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1075557,
regarding tcpxtract: ftbfs with GCC-14
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 1088876 serious
Bug #1088876 [xsdata] Missing dependency on python3-ruff / ruff
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1088876: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notfixed 1091239 2.32.1-2
Bug #1091239 {Done: Charles Plessy }
[src:r-cran-rstanarm] r-cran-rstanarm: FTBFS on armhf: make[1]: ***
[/usr/lib/R/etc/Makeconf:202: stan_files/continuous.o] Error 1
No longer marked as fixed in versions 2.32.1-2.
> t
Control: tags -1 patch
On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 02:48:21PM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, 2024-11-29 at 14:28 +0100, Michael Prokop wrote:
> > I'm not sure how relevant hfsutils is those days, but due to this
> > FTBFS issue, hfsutils is no longer present in Debian un
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 patch
Bug #1075067 [src:hfsutils] hfsutils: ftbfs with GCC-14
Added tag(s) patch.
--
1075067: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1075067
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing control commands:
> tags 1075557 + patch
Bug #1075557 [src:tcpxtract] tcpxtract: ftbfs with GCC-14
Added tag(s) patch.
--
1075557: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1075557
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Package: src:backup-manager
Version: 0.7.14-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs trixie sid
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules clean
dh clean
Control: tags 1063447 + patch
Control: tags 1063447 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for lptools (versioned as 0.3.0-2.1) and uploaded
it to DELAYED/1. Please feel free to tell me if I should cancel it.
cu
Adrian
diffstat for lptools-0.3.0 lptools-0.3.0
changelog |7 ++
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 1098555 golang-github-go-fed-httpsig FTBFS with Go 1.24
Bug #1098555 [src:golang-github-go-fed-httpsig] golang-github-go-fed-httpsig:
FTBFS: algorithms_test.go:679: "rsa_SHA3_224": expected error, got: %!s()
Changed Bug title to 'golang-g
Source: mathgl
Version: 8.0.3-1
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-Cc: Rafael Laboissière , Alastair McKinstry
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/mathgl
Issues preventing migration:
∙ ∙ autopkgtest for mathgl/8.0.3-1: amd64: Pass, arm64: Pass, armel: Regression
or new test ♻, armhf: Regression or new tes
Your message dated Tue, 08 Apr 2025 13:58:47 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1094757: fixed in pybdsf 1.13.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1094757,
regarding pybdsf: FTBFS with numpy 2.x: error: ‘PyArray_FLOAT’ undeclared
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
Your message dated Thu, 10 Apr 2025 12:52:14 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1100387: fixed in svn2git 2.4.0-3.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1100387,
regarding svn2git: fails to start with ruby exception
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been de
Your message dated Thu, 10 Apr 2025 11:50:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1100208: fixed in debmake 4.5.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1100208,
regarding debmake: FTBFS: pyproject_hooks._impl.BackendUnavailable: Cannot
import 'setuptools.build_meta'
to be marked as done.
Thi
Control: reassign -1 src:jline2
Control: affects -1 src:jython
Control: found -1 2.14.6-5
Control: tags -1 pending confirmed
Hi,
On Thu, 20 Mar 2025 17:46:30 +0100 Bastian Germann wrote:
> Package: jython
> Version: 2.7.3+repack1-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
>
Control: tags 1075557 + patch
Dear maintainer,
I've uploaded an NMU for tcpxtract (versioned as 1.0.1-18.1).
The diff is attached to this message.
cu
Adrian
diffstat for tcpxtract-1.0.1 tcpxtract-1.0.1
changelog |7 +++
patches/80_gcc14.patch | 15 +++
patche
Hi,
On 10-04-2025 10:46, Paul Gevers wrote:
On Sun, 23 Mar 2025 20:14:34 +0100 Sylvestre Ledru
Do you want me to bump them?
Hmm, we should have done that at least 3 months ago. I consider it a bit
too late now as there are both key and non-key package involved.
This reply had been sitting
Your message dated Wed, 09 Apr 2025 14:36:24 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1101795: fixed in dh-raku 0.18
has caused the Debian Bug report #1101795,
regarding dh-raku: Lots of raku packages FTBFS: method argument was given, but
was no,t a hash reference at /usr/bin/dh_raku_install li
Your message dated Mon, 07 Apr 2025 08:35:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1101585: fixed in rust-numbat-cli 1.11.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1101585,
regarding rust-numbat-cli: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable:
librust-chrono-tz-0.8+default-dev (>= 0.8.5-~~)
to be m
Source: r-bioc-mofa2
Version: 1.16.0+ds-4
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/r-bioc-mofa2
Issues preventing migration:
∙ ∙ autopkgtest for r-bioc-mofa2/1.16.0+ds-4: amd64: Pass, arm64: Pass,
ppc64el: Regression or new test ♻, riscv64: Regression or new test ♻, s390x:
R
Control: tag -1 help
Hi all,
I had a look at the build failure and could reproduce it locally. Here
is an extract from Santiago's report.
The test failure looks relevant and probably should not ignored.
Unfortunately, the combination of C++ and Python is very, very far from
my expertise.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 1101613 1.6.9-1
Bug #1101613 [src:pgpainless] pgpainless: FTBFS: KeyInfo.java:8: error: package
org.bouncycastle.asn1.gnu does not exist
Marked as fixed in versions pgpainless/1.6.9-1.
Bug #1101613 [src:pgpainless] pgpainless: FTBFS: KeyInf
On Mon, Apr 07, 2025 at 07:58:32PM +0200, Salvo Tomaselli wrote:
the tests were not running in my chroot when I originally made the package, so
I'm not sure why they got ran later on.
As I had seen not depending on pytest would just skip them.
I'm not sure why they wouldn't have run before, in
Your message dated Mon, 07 Apr 2025 10:04:11 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1078613: fixed in dput-ng 1.42
has caused the Debian Bug report #1078613,
regarding dput-ng: will FTBFS during trixie support period
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been de
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1101675 - fixed-upstream
Bug #1101675 [python3-argcomplete] python3-argcomplete: breaks zsh completions
Removed tag(s) fixed-upstream.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1101675: https://bugs.deb
that might be a question for syq, or mips porters ...
On 07.04.25 09:39, Helmut Grohne wrote:
Package: lib32atomic1,libn32atomic1
Version: 15-20250329-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: fileconflict
Hi Matthias,
I observe that lib32atomic1 and libn32atomic1 both ins
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1078631 [src:node-tough-cookie] node-tough-cookie: will FTBFS during
trixie support period
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1078631: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1078631
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
This is still a problem today.
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/spesmilo/electrum/issues/9727
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Processing control commands:
> forwarded -1 https://github.com/spesmilo/electrum/issues/9727
Bug #1102609 [electrum] electrum: Electrum 4.5.8 does not run with
python3-aiorpcx >= 24
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://github.com/spesmilo/electrum/issues/9727'.
--
1102609: https://bugs.deb
Package: electrum
Version: 4.5.8+ds-5
Severity: grave
Tags: upstream
Justification: renders package unusable
Electrum 4.5.8 will not run with python3-aiorpcx >= 24.
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/electrum", line 89, in
check_imports()
~^^
File "/usr/bin
Hi Matija,
On Thu, Apr 03, 2025 at 01:20:00AM +0200, Matija Nalis wrote:
> the tt-rss package in Debian has last been updated more than 4
> years ago, and has several seriuous bug which are fixed in
> upstream, yet have not received updated in more than a year.
>
> Would you like help with bringi
Your message dated Thu, 10 Apr 2025 22:06:48 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1102592: fixed in lsp-plugins 1.2.21-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1102592,
regarding src:lsp-plugins: fails to migrate to testing for too long
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
Package: qiv
Version: 3.0.1
Severity: grave
Hi,
Since, the upgrade to qiv 3.0.1, when I tried to set background with:
$ qiv -z image.jpg
qiv answer: "qiv: cannot load background_image" whatever the image I tested.
qiv still can load image properly when used as a viewier.
I don't know where th
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
Benjamin Drung, on 2025-04-07:
> pysurfer fails to build from source due to the unsatisfied dependency
> on python3-numpy-abi9. There is only python3-numpy but no
> python3-numpy-abi9 (or similar).
Indeed, there looks to be something off with the dependency
mayavi2,
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #1102297 [pysurfer] pysurfer FTBFS: unsatisfied dependency:
python3-numpy-abi9
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
1102297: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1102297
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with probl
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 1102413
Bug #1102413 {Done: Moritz Schlarb }
[src:libapache2-mod-auth-openidc] libapache2-mod-auth-openidc: CVE-2025-31492
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you
[ With my Release Team hat on ]
On Tue, 8 Apr 2025 00:44:17 -0400 Sandro Tosi wrote:> 2 days?
you may want to reassess your expectations, demands, and
approach to other volunteers in the project.
> which I would
> prefer not to do, as I've seen multiple cases were you prefer to do this
> your
Le mer. 9 avr. 2025 à 17:26, Simon Josefsson a écrit :
> Jérémy Lal writes:
>
> >> I had a look at another approach, just upgrading the dependency to
> >> golang-github-smallstep-crypto-dev
> >> for these two packages:
> >> - golang-step-cli-utils: all fine, level1
> >> - golang-github-smallstep
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 serious
Bug #1040771 [src:openjdk-22] openjdk-22 should not be in stable releases
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
--
1040771: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1040771
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org w
On 4/8/25 10:08, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Thomas, I think a 2-day NMU fixing only this bug is appropriate, but
since you got review feedback from Sandro, try to go through it in order
to improve the change.
I'm happy to comply to any suggestion. So far, I haven't read any that
deserve a
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1101345 [golang-gitlab-gitlab-org-api-client-go-dev] symlink vs directory
conflict for golang-gitlab-gitlab-org-api-client-go-dev overwriting
golang-github-xanzy-go-gitlab-dev
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1101345: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/b
Source: psi4
Version: 1:1.3.2+dfsg-6
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-Cc: Michael Banck
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/psi4
Issues preventing migration:
∙ ∙ autopkgtest for psi4/1:1.3.2+dfsg-6: amd64: Pass, arm64: Pass, armel: Pass,
armhf: Pass, i386: Pass, ppc64el: Pass, riscv64: Pass, s390x: Regre
Processing control commands:
> tags 1075026 + patch
Bug #1075026 {Done: Adrian Bunk } [src:gnome-paint]
gnome-paint: ftbfs with GCC-14
Added tag(s) patch.
--
1075026: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1075026
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags 1075026 + patch
Dear maintainer,
I've uploaded an NMU for gnome-paint (versioned as 0.4.0-10.1).
The diff is attached to this message.
cu
Adrian
diffstat for gnome-paint-0.4.0 gnome-paint-0.4.0
changelog|7 +
patches/gcc-14.patch | 227 +++
Your message dated Thu, 10 Apr 2025 11:34:50 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1100907: fixed in netplan.io 1.1.2-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #1100907,
regarding netplan.io: flaky autopkgtest (mostly on amd64 and s390x): multiple
sub tests
to be marked as done.
This means that yo
Your message dated Mon, 07 Apr 2025 22:52:56 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1099251: fixed in node-d3-timer 1.0.10+~1.0.10-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1099251,
regarding node-d3-timer: FTBFS: Error: should be strictly equal
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Wed, 09 Apr 2025 08:50:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1102443: fixed in golang-github-smallstep-certificates
0.20.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1102443,
regarding golang-github-smallstep-certificates-dev: Depends:
golang-smallstep-crypto-dev but it is no
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1099251 [src:node-d3-timer] node-d3-timer: FTBFS: # fail 1
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1099251: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1099251
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Package: gitaly-installer
Version: 17.3.6+debian2
Severity: serious
User: helm...@debian.org
Usertags: dep17m2
Hi,
your package installs files in /lib:
/lib/systemd/system/gitaly.service
Starting with trixie, installing files in those aliased locations is no
longer allowed and considered an RC
Source: gnome-mahjongg
Version: 1:48.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
gnome-mahjongg fails to build from source in unstable when enabling the
nocheck build profile. A build ends with:
| Program gtk4-update-icon-cache found: YES (/usr/bin/gtk4-update-icon-cache)
| Program update-desktop-database
Your message dated Thu, 10 Apr 2025 21:06:42 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1075026: fixed in gnome-paint 0.4.0-10.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1075026,
regarding gnome-paint: ftbfs with GCC-14
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
Your message dated Thu, 10 Apr 2025 20:40:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1088040: fixed in freesas 2024.9.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1088040,
regarding freesas: FTBFS: cp: cannot create directory
'.pybuild/cpython3_3.13_freesas/build/freesas/': No such file or directory
Your message dated Thu, 10 Apr 2025 20:40:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1092054: fixed in freesas 2024.9.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1092054,
regarding freesas ftbfs with Python 3.13 as the default
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Thu, 10 Apr 2025 20:39:14 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1084512: fixed in bustle 0.11.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1084512,
regarding Removal notice: obsolete
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Thu, 10 Apr 2025 20:39:14 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1084243: fixed in bustle 0.11.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1084243,
regarding bustle: FTBFS: Bustle/Loader/Pcap.hs:107:5: error: [GHC-88464]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
Hi Pierre,
I'm afraid I never managed to wrap my head around the SPAdes
version bump to 4.0.0 in the past year, and it seems it is going
to interfere with the availability of several tools in trixie if
the situation keeps going.
Adrian Bunk suggested, on 2025-04-10:
> I wonder whether spades 4.0.
Source: rust-pdb2
Version: 0.9.1-1
Severity: serious
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/rust-pdb2
Issues preventing migration:
∙ ∙ autopkgtest for rust-pdb2/0.9.1-1: amd64: Regression or new test ♻, arm64:
Regression or new test ♻, armel: Regression or new test ♻, armhf: Regression or
new test ♻, i
Hi.
Thanks a lot for such comprehensive analysis of the issue!
El 7/4/25 a las 7:31, Simon Josefsson escribió:
At this point, I'm not sure if it makes sense to re-upload
golang-github-openpubkey-openpubkey with that Breaks, since nobody
should ever attempt to build opkssh 0.3.0-1 with
golang-gi
Processing control commands:
> forcemerge 1094086 1054740
Bug #1094086 [src:ruby-shoulda-context] ruby-shoulda-context: FTBFS: ERROR:
Test "ruby3.3" failed:
./build/reproducible-path/ruby-shoulda-context-2.0.0/test/shoul
Your message dated Wed, 09 Apr 2025 11:49:41 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1102451: fixed in mgmt 0.0.26.git.2024.10.25.85e1d6c0e8-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1102451,
regarding mgmt: move aliased files from / to /usr (DEP17)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim th
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 patch pending
Bug #1086645 [src:dbus-test-runner] dbus-test-runner: autopkgtest regression:
test depends on obsolete package bustle
Added tag(s) patch and pending.
--
1086645: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1086645
Debian Bug Tracking Sy
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1101795 + ftbfs
Bug #1101795 [dh-raku] dh-raku: Lots of raku packages FTBFS: method argument
was given, but was no,t a hash reference at /usr/bin/dh_raku_install line 65.
Added tag(s) ftbfs.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 1101704 0.9.0-2
Bug #1101704 [src:gittuf] gittuf: FTBFS: ca.Root undefined (type
root.CertificateAuthority has no field or method Root)
The source 'gittuf' and version '0.9.0-2' do not appear to match any binary
packages
Marked as fixed in
Your message dated Mon, 07 Apr 2025 07:34:21 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1075599: fixed in uml-utilities 20070815.4-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1075599,
regarding uml-utilities: ftbfs with GCC-14
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been deal
1 - 100 of 236 matches
Mail list logo
