Bug#1098645: texinfo: src:sbcl FTBFS: /usr/bin/texi2dvi: 713: cd: can't cd to asdf.t2d/dvi/bak

2025-02-22 Thread Sean Whitton
control: severity -1 important control: retitle -1 d/rules shouldn't ever try to build in parallel Hello, On Sun 23 Feb 2025 at 10:15am +08, Sean Whitton wrote: > control: reassign -1 src:sbcl > control: retitle -1 sbcl: FTBFS: /usr/bin/texi2dvi: 713: cd: can't cd to > asdf.t2d/dvi/bak > > Than

Processed: Re: texinfo: src:sbcl FTBFS: /usr/bin/texi2dvi: 713: cd: can't cd to asdf.t2d/dvi/bak

2025-02-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 important Bug #1098645 [src:sbcl] sbcl: FTBFS: /usr/bin/texi2dvi: 713: cd: can't cd to asdf.t2d/dvi/bak Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' > retitle -1 d/rules shouldn't ever try to build in parallel Bug #1098645 [src:sbcl] sbcl: FTBFS: /usr/bin/

Bug#1098217: marked as done (singularity: doesn't work with Numpy 2)

2025-02-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 23 Feb 2025 07:05:25 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1098217: fixed in singularity 1.0.0+git20241231-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1098217, regarding singularity: doesn't work with Numpy 2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem ha

Bug#1098706: linux: building out-of-tree modules fails with pahole: not found

2025-02-22 Thread Antonio Russo
Just to clarify for everyone: this is resolved by installing pahole. Presumably, the solution is to just to make kbuild Depend: on pahole. Best, Antonio OpenPGP_0x72DB026E04C1C768.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#1098645: texinfo: src:sbcl FTBFS: /usr/bin/texi2dvi: 713: cd: can't cd to asdf.t2d/dvi/bak

2025-02-22 Thread Sean Whitton
control: reassign -1 src:sbcl control: retitle -1 sbcl: FTBFS: /usr/bin/texi2dvi: 713: cd: can't cd to asdf.t2d/dvi/bak Thanks both, reassigning. -- Sean Whitton

Bug#1098645: texinfo: src:sbcl FTBFS: /usr/bin/texi2dvi: 713: cd: can't cd to asdf.t2d/dvi/bak

2025-02-22 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello, On Sat 22 Feb 2025 at 07:10pm +01, Santiago Vila wrote: > For the record, "sbcl" has been failing to build for me > 100% of the time on machines with a single CPU at least > since version 2.3.7-2. > > Please try GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX="nr_cpus=1". If that does not > work, please contact me pri

Processed: Re: texinfo: src:sbcl FTBFS: /usr/bin/texi2dvi: 713: cd: can't cd to asdf.t2d/dvi/bak

2025-02-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reassign -1 src:sbcl Bug #1098645 [texinfo] texinfo: src:sbcl FTBFS: /usr/bin/texi2dvi: 713: cd: can't cd to asdf.t2d/dvi/bak Bug reassigned from package 'texinfo' to 'src:sbcl'. No longer marked as found in versions texinfo/7.1.1-1. Ignoring request to alter fixed

Bug#1098700: wvdial: segmentation fault error when running wvdial

2025-02-22 Thread Felix
Package: wvdial Version: 1.61-8 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable X-Debbugs-Cc: fizo...@hotmail.com -- System Information: Debian Release: trixie/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linu

Bug#1098706: linux: building out-of-tree modules fails with pahole: not found

2025-02-22 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Source: linux Version: 6.12.16-1 Severity: serious Hi, the last linux upload causes regressions building (probably) all out-of-tree dkms modules, e.g. DKMS (dkms-3.1.5) make.log for dkms_test/1.0 for kernel 6.12.16-amd64 (x86_64) Sun Feb 23 00:18:07 UTC 2025 Building module(s) # command: make -

Processed: Bug#1098690 marked as pending in adduser

2025-02-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1098690 [adduser] adduser: Upgrade of network manager is failing due to missing API call in adduser Bug #1098692 [adduser] adduser: Undefined subroutine &Debian::AdduserLogging::textdomain called Added tag(s) pending. Added tag(s) pending. --

Bug#1098481: FTBFS: static_asserts in matchpathcon.c impossible to satify on x32

2025-02-22 Thread наб
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/SELinuxProject/selinux/issues/463 Control: tags -1 + patch The reported forwarded this; I wrote a patch @ https://github.com/SELinuxProject/selinux/pull/464 which I'm including below. This makes selinux trunk compile on my x32 system (x32 does not need m

Processed: Re: Bug#1098481: FTBFS: static_asserts in matchpathcon.c impossible to satify on x32

2025-02-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > forwarded -1 https://github.com/SELinuxProject/selinux/issues/463 Bug #1098481 [libselinux1] FTBFS: static_asserts in matchpathcon.c impossible to satify on x32 Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://github.com/SELinuxProject/selinux/issues/463'. > tags -1 + patc

Bug#1098692: marked as done (adduser: Undefined subroutine &Debian::AdduserLogging::textdomain called)

2025-02-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 22 Feb 2025 21:34:10 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1098690: fixed in adduser 3.141 has caused the Debian Bug report #1098690, regarding adduser: Undefined subroutine &Debian::AdduserLogging::textdomain called to be marked as done. This means that you claim th

Bug#1098690: marked as pending in adduser

2025-02-22 Thread Marc Haber
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1098690 in adduser reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/adduser/-/commit/fa222f56a5f81d0f8938b8eba80c25a32

Bug#1098690: marked as done (adduser: Upgrade of network manager is failing due to missing API call in adduser)

2025-02-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 22 Feb 2025 21:34:10 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1098690: fixed in adduser 3.141 has caused the Debian Bug report #1098690, regarding adduser: Upgrade of network manager is failing due to missing API call in adduser to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#1098690: marked as done (adduser: Upgrade of network manager is failing due to missing API call in adduser)

2025-02-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 22 Feb 2025 21:34:10 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1098692: fixed in adduser 3.141 has caused the Debian Bug report #1098692, regarding adduser: Upgrade of network manager is failing due to missing API call in adduser to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#1098692: marked as done (adduser: Undefined subroutine &Debian::AdduserLogging::textdomain called)

2025-02-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 22 Feb 2025 21:34:10 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1098692: fixed in adduser 3.141 has caused the Debian Bug report #1098692, regarding adduser: Undefined subroutine &Debian::AdduserLogging::textdomain called to be marked as done. This means that you claim th

Bug#1098692: marked as pending in adduser

2025-02-22 Thread Marc Haber
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1098692 in adduser reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/adduser/-/commit/fa222f56a5f81d0f8938b8eba80c25a32

Processed: Bug#1098692 marked as pending in adduser

2025-02-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1098692 [adduser] adduser: Undefined subroutine &Debian::AdduserLogging::textdomain called Bug #1098690 [adduser] adduser: Upgrade of network manager is failing due to missing API call in adduser Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1098692 to

Processed: forcibly merging 1098692 1098690

2025-02-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 1098692 serious Bug #1098692 [adduser] adduser: Undefined subroutine &Debian::AdduserLogging::textdomain called Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > severity 1098690 serious Bug #1098690 [adduser] adduser: Upgrade of network mana

Bug#1098609: marked as done (python-renault-api: FTBFS: E assert 2 == 0)

2025-02-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 22 Feb 2025 20:49:52 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1098609: fixed in python-renault-api 0.2.9-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1098609, regarding python-renault-api: FTBFS: E assert 2 == 0 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the probl

Bug#1098693: gubbins: autopkgtest regression in testing

2025-02-22 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: gubbins Version: 3.4-1 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: regression Hi Maintainer Sometime around 2025-01-29, gubbins' autopkgtest regressed in testing [1]. I've copied what I hope is the relevant part of the log below. Regards Graham [1] https://ci.debian.n

Bug#1098543: marked as done (dogtail: FTBFS: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'cairo')

2025-02-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 22 Feb 2025 19:34:28 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1098543: fixed in dogtail 1.0.0-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #1098543, regarding dogtail: FTBFS: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'cairo' to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the prob

Processed: tagging 1098543

2025-02-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1098543 + pending Bug #1098543 [src:dogtail] dogtail: FTBFS: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'cairo' Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1098543: https://bugs.debian.or

Bug#1094138: udptunnel: flaky autopkgtest on s390x: UDPTunnel communication failed

2025-02-22 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi Marcos, On 21-02-2025 19:04, Marcos Talau wrote: According to [1], please, could you provide access to testbeds to me? [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2024/03/msg00034.html To align a time, it easiest to do that on IRC in #debci on oftc. Does that work for you? (Either I or t

Bug#1098629: marked as done (sphinx-theme-builder: FTBFS: E TypeError: CliRunner.__init__() got an unexpected keyword argument 'mix_stderr')

2025-02-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 22 Feb 2025 18:51:07 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1098629: fixed in sphinx-theme-builder 0.2.0b2-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #1098629, regarding sphinx-theme-builder: FTBFS: E TypeError: CliRunner.__init__() got an unexpected keyword argument 'mi

Bug#1091355: marked as done (rust-pollster: unsatisfiable dependency librust-pollster-macro-0.4)

2025-02-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 22 Feb 2025 19:00:27 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1091355: fixed in rust-pollster-macro 0.4.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1091355, regarding rust-pollster: unsatisfiable dependency librust-pollster-macro-0.4 to be marked as done. This means that you c

Bug#1098617: marked as done (python-yamlfix: FTBFS: E TypeError: CliRunner.__init__() got an unexpected keyword argument 'mix_stderr')

2025-02-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 22 Feb 2025 20:33:14 +0200 with message-id and subject line Fixed in version 1.17.0-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #1098617, regarding python-yamlfix: FTBFS: E TypeError: CliRunner.__init__() got an unexpected keyword argument 'mix_stderr' to be marked as done.

Bug#1098645: texinfo: src:sbcl FTBFS: /usr/bin/texi2dvi: 713: cd: can't cd to asdf.t2d/dvi/bak

2025-02-22 Thread Santiago Vila
tar: sbcl.aux: file changed as we read it Such line alone suggests some kind of makefile bug, like for example not being completely ready to be used in parallel builds. I would reassign this to sbcl. Thanks.

Bug#1091496: dns-root-data: will FTBFS during trixie support period

2025-02-22 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Feb 22, Santiago Vila wrote: > It is not possible to stop running the test when we know that it will fail? It could be run only when the source package is built, but I like the idea of verifying the key material every time the binary package is built too. I will talk to the IANA people to r

Bug#1098645: texinfo: src:sbcl FTBFS: /usr/bin/texi2dvi: 713: cd: can't cd to asdf.t2d/dvi/bak

2025-02-22 Thread Santiago Vila
Hi. For the record, "sbcl" has been failing to build for me 100% of the time on machines with a single CPU at least since version 2.3.7-2. Please try GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX="nr_cpus=1". If that does not work, please contact me privately and I will gladly provide a machine where it fails 100% of the

Bug#1091496: dns-root-data: will FTBFS during trixie support period

2025-02-22 Thread Santiago Vila
El 22/2/25 a las 18:20, Marco d'Itri escribió: On Dec 27, Santiago Vila wrote: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable in the year 2028, your package failed to build: This is expected, due to its specific nature. If it will be needed to rebuild the package over the lifetime of trixie the

Processed: Re: devscripts 2.25.3: autopkgtests fail to find the lzip command (was: FTBFS...)

2025-02-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > retitle -1 devscripts 2.25.3: autopkgtests fail to find the lzip command Bug #1098681 [devscripts] FTBFS: devscripts 2.25.3: autopkgtests fail to find the lzip command Changed Bug title to 'devscripts 2.25.3: autopkgtests fail to find the lzip command' from 'FTBFS:

Bug#1098681: devscripts 2.25.3: autopkgtests fail to find the lzip command (was: FTBFS...)

2025-02-22 Thread James Addison
Package: devscripts Followup-For: Bug #1098681 Control: retitle -1 devscripts 2.25.3: autopkgtests fail to find the lzip command Control: tags -1 - ftbfs My apologies - I now understand that autopkgtest failures are not categorized as FTBFS, and am adjusting this bugreport accordingly.

Bug#1095742: cambalache: broken dependencies

2025-02-22 Thread Sid T
Get the following after in Debian unstable "apt install cambalache". $ cambalache Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/cambalache", line 42, in from cambalache.app import CmbApplication File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/cambalache/__init__.py", line 90, in from .cmb_v

Bug#1091496: marked as done (dns-root-data: will FTBFS during trixie support period)

2025-02-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 22 Feb 2025 18:20:12 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1091496: dns-root-data: will FTBFS during trixie support period has caused the Debian Bug report #1091496, regarding dns-root-data: will FTBFS during trixie support period to be marked as done. This means

Bug#1098681: FTBFS: devscripts 2.25.3: autopkgtests fail to find the lzip command

2025-02-22 Thread James Addison
Package: devscripts Version: 2.25.3 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Dear Maintainer, For bug #1061479 the devscripts package recently added support for lz compression; the resulting source package appears to fail autopkg

Processed: control

2025-02-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 1096221 https://github.com/fish-shell/fish-shell/issues/11164 Bug #1096221 [src:fish] fish: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: cd obj-x86_64-linux-gnu && LC_ALL=C.UTF-8 MESON_TESTTHREADS=8 ninja test returned exit code 1 Set Bug forwarded-to-

Bug#1096217: marked as done (rust-gtk4: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: /usr/share/cargo/bin/cargo build returned exit code 101)

2025-02-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 22 Feb 2025 16:06:02 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1096217: fixed in rust-gtk4 0.9.6-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1096217, regarding rust-gtk4: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: /usr/share/cargo/bin/cargo build returned exit code 101 to be marked as done. Th

Bug#1098605: marked as done (python-proliantutils: FTBFS: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'pyasn1.compat.octets')

2025-02-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 22 Feb 2025 15:09:36 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1098605: fixed in python-pysnmp4 4.4.12-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1098605, regarding python-proliantutils: FTBFS: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'pyasn1.compat.octets' to be marked as done. Th

Bug#1098608: marked as done (python-recipe-scrapers: FTBFS: AssertionError: Exception not raised : .instructions_list() was expected to raise an exception but it did not.)

2025-02-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 22 Feb 2025 16:02:46 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1098608: fixed in python-recipe-scrapers 15.5.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1098608, regarding python-recipe-scrapers: FTBFS: AssertionError: Exception not raised : .instructions_list() was expected to

Processed: Bug#1098627 marked as pending in scriv

2025-02-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1098627 [src:scriv] scriv: FTBFS: tests/test_process.py:12: AssertionError Added tag(s) pending. -- 1098627: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1098627 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1098627: marked as pending in scriv

2025-02-22 Thread Edward Betts
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1098627 in scriv reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/scriv/-/commit/0478e033989480a1843197d

Bug#1098628: sarsen: FTBFS: E AssertionError: assert 1 == 0

2025-02-22 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 2/22/25 12:29 AM, Santiago Vila wrote: === FAILURES === __ test_main ___ def test_main() -> None: res = runner.invoke(__main__.app, ["gtc", "--help"])

Bug#1098606: marked as done (python-pysmi-lextudio: FTBFS: E ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'pyasn1.compat.octets')

2025-02-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 22 Feb 2025 15:09:36 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1098606: fixed in python-pysnmp4 4.4.12-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1098606, regarding python-pysmi-lextudio: FTBFS: E ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'pyasn1.compat.octets' to be marked as done

Bug#1098610: marked as done (python-scciclient: FTBFS: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'pyasn1.compat.octets')

2025-02-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 22 Feb 2025 15:09:36 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1098610: fixed in python-pysnmp4 4.4.12-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1098610, regarding python-scciclient: FTBFS: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'pyasn1.compat.octets' to be marked as done. This

Bug#1098592: marked as done (pysmi: FTBFS: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'pyasn1.compat.octets')

2025-02-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 22 Feb 2025 15:09:36 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1098592: fixed in python-pysnmp4 4.4.12-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1098592, regarding pysmi: FTBFS: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'pyasn1.compat.octets' to be marked as done. This means that y

Bug#1098604: marked as done (python-pyasn1-modules: FTBFS: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'pyasn1.compat.octets')

2025-02-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 22 Feb 2025 15:09:25 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1098604: fixed in python-pyasn1-modules 0.4.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1098604, regarding python-pyasn1-modules: FTBFS: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'pyasn1.compat.octets' to be marked as do

Bug#1098568: marked as done (ironic: FTBFS: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'pyasn1.compat.octets')

2025-02-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 22 Feb 2025 15:09:36 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1098568: fixed in python-pysnmp4 4.4.12-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1098568, regarding ironic: FTBFS: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'pyasn1.compat.octets' to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#1098608: python-recipe-scrapers: FTBFS: AssertionError: Exception not raised : .instructions_list() was expected to raise an exception but it did not.

2025-02-22 Thread Christian Marillat
On 21 févr. 2025 23:28, Santiago Vila wrote: > Package: src:python-recipe-scrapers > Version: 15.4.0-1 > Severity: serious > Tags: ftbfs trixie sid > > Dear maintainer: > > During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build: For the record, the problem come from python3-b

Processed: bug 1098608 is forwarded to https://github.com/hhursev/recipe-scrapers/issues/1497

2025-02-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 1098608 https://github.com/hhursev/recipe-scrapers/issues/1497 Bug #1098608 [src:python-recipe-scrapers] python-recipe-scrapers: FTBFS: AssertionError: Exception not raised : .instructions_list() was expected to raise an exception but

Bug#1098671: libanyevent-riperedis-perl: FTBFS: Autobuilder hangs

2025-02-22 Thread Santiago Vila
Package: src:libanyevent-riperedis-perl Version: 0.48-2 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs trixie sid Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build: [...] ok 10 - errors in m

Processed: bug 1093690 is forwarded to https://github.com/containers/netavark/pull/1187

2025-02-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 1093690 https://github.com/containers/netavark/pull/1187 Bug #1093690 [src:netavark] netavark: Upcoming update of zbus to v5 Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://github.com/containers/netavark/pull/1187'. > thanks Stopping processin

Processed: Re: multiple FTBFS: tracker-sparql-3.0, tracker-sparql-0.10 not found

2025-02-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reassign -1 libtracker-sparql-3.0-dev 3.8.2-3 Bug #1098546 [src:gnome-music] gnome-music: FTBFS: Package 'tinysparql-3.0', required by 'tracker-sparql-3.0', not found Bug reassigned from package 'src:gnome-music' to 'libtracker-sparql-3.0-dev'. No longer marked as f

Processed (with 2 errors): Re: multiple FTBFS: tracker-sparql-3.0, tracker-sparql-0.10 not found

2025-02-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reassign -1 libtracker-sparql-3.0-dev 3.8.2-3 Bug #1098545 [src:gnome-photos] gnome-photos: FTBFS: ../meson.build:179:21: ERROR: Dependency "tracker-sparql-3.0" not found, tried pkgconfig Bug reassigned from package 'src:gnome-photos' to 'libtracker-sparql-3.0-dev'.

Processed (with 2 errors): Re: multiple FTBFS: tracker-sparql-3.0, tracker-sparql-0.10 not found

2025-02-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reassign -1 libtracker-sparql-3.0-dev 3.8.2-3 Bug #1098537 [src:brasero] brasero: FTBFS: Package 'tracker-sparql-0.10', required by 'virtual:world', not found Bug reassigned from package 'src:brasero' to 'libtracker-sparql-3.0-dev'. No longer marked as found in vers

Bug#1098537: multiple FTBFS: tracker-sparql-3.0, tracker-sparql-0.10 not found

2025-02-22 Thread Simon McVittie
Control: reassign -1 libtracker-sparql-3.0-dev 3.8.2-3 Control: retitle -1 libtracker-sparql-3.0-dev: missing dependency on libtinysparql-dev Control: forcemerge 1098545 1098546 1098537 Control: affects 1098545 + src:brasero src:gnome-music src:gnome-photos I believe the FTBFSs Santiago recently

Bug#1093362: marked as done (thunderbird: FTBFS: According to "pip check", the current Python environment has package-compatibility issues.)

2025-02-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 22 Feb 2025 13:48:29 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1093362: fixed in thunderbird 1:128.7.0esr-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1093362, regarding thunderbird: FTBFS: According to "pip check", the current Python environment has package-compatibility issues.

Processed: reassign 1098592 to python3-pysnmp4

2025-02-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 1098592 python3-pysnmp4 Bug #1098592 [src:pysmi] pysmi: FTBFS: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'pyasn1.compat.octets' Bug reassigned from package 'src:pysmi' to 'python3-pysnmp4'. No longer marked as found in versions pysmi/0.3.4-2.

Processed: reassign 1098606 to python-pysnmp4

2025-02-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 1098606 python-pysnmp4 Bug #1098606 [src:python-pysmi-lextudio] python-pysmi-lextudio: FTBFS: E ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'pyasn1.compat.octets' Bug reassigned from package 'src:python-pysmi-lextudio' to 'python-pysnmp4'. No

Processed: affects 1098605

2025-02-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > affects 1098605 python-proliantutils Bug #1098605 [python-pysnmp4] python-proliantutils: FTBFS: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'pyasn1.compat.octets' Added indication that 1098605 affects python-proliantutils > thanks Stopping processing he

Processed: reassign 1098610 to python-pysnmp4

2025-02-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 1098610 python-pysnmp4 Bug #1098610 [src:python-scciclient] python-scciclient: FTBFS: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'pyasn1.compat.octets' Bug reassigned from package 'src:python-scciclient' to 'python-pysnmp4'. No longer marked a

Processed: affects 1098606

2025-02-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > affects 1098606 python-pysmi-lextudio Bug #1098606 [src:python-pysmi-lextudio] python-pysmi-lextudio: FTBFS: E ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'pyasn1.compat.octets' Added indication that 1098606 affects python-pysmi-lextudio > thanks Stop

Processed: reassign 1098605 to python-pysnmp4

2025-02-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 1098605 python-pysnmp4 Bug #1098605 [src:python-proliantutils] python-proliantutils: FTBFS: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'pyasn1.compat.octets' Bug reassigned from package 'src:python-proliantutils' to 'python-pysnmp4'. No longer

Processed: affects 1098610

2025-02-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > affects 1098610 python-scciclient Bug #1098610 [python-pysnmp4] python-scciclient: FTBFS: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'pyasn1.compat.octets' Added indication that 1098610 affects python-scciclient > thanks Stopping processing here. Plea

Processed: affects 1098568

2025-02-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > affects 1098568 ironic Bug #1098568 [python-pysnmp4] ironic: FTBFS: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'pyasn1.compat.octets' Added indication that 1098568 affects ironic > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assista

Processed: reassign 1098568 to python-pysnmp4

2025-02-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 1098568 python-pysnmp4 Bug #1098568 [src:ironic] ironic: FTBFS: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'pyasn1.compat.octets' Bug reassigned from package 'src:ironic' to 'python-pysnmp4'. No longer marked as found in versions ironic/1:26.1

Processed: affects 1098592

2025-02-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > affects 1098592 pysmi Bug #1098592 [python3-pysnmp4] pysmi: FTBFS: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'pyasn1.compat.octets' Added indication that 1098592 affects pysmi > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistanc

Bug#1098645: texinfo: src:sbcl FTBFS: /usr/bin/texi2dvi: 713: cd: can't cd to asdf.t2d/dvi/bak

2025-02-22 Thread Hilmar Preuße
On 22.02.25 06:52, Sean Whitton wrote: Hello Sean, It looks like the texinfo now in sid causes src:sbcl in sid to FTBFS. I'm filing a bug against texinfo because the output suggests that the problem is there, but perhaps src:sbcl is the place where changes are needed. Here's the tail of the bu

Bug#1098415: marked as done (python3-pampy: missed python3-six dependency)

2025-02-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 22 Feb 2025 12:34:43 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1098415: fixed in python-pampy 2.0.2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1098415, regarding python3-pampy: missed python3-six dependency to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has bee

Bug#1097132: marked as done (crun: FTBFS on i386: build-dependency not installable: libcriu-dev)

2025-02-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 22 Feb 2025 12:05:27 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1097132: fixed in crun 1.20-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1097132, regarding crun: FTBFS on i386: build-dependency not installable: libcriu-dev to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pr

Bug#1098645: texinfo: src:sbcl FTBFS: /usr/bin/texi2dvi: 713: cd: can't cd to asdf.t2d/dvi/bak

2025-02-22 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello, On Sat 22 Feb 2025 at 12:57pm +01, Hilmar Preuße wrote: > On 22.02.25 06:52, Sean Whitton wrote: > > Hello Sean, > >> It looks like the texinfo now in sid causes src:sbcl in sid to FTBFS. >> I'm filing a bug against texinfo because the output suggests that the >> problem is there, but perh

Processed: severity of 1080874 is serious

2025-02-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 1080874 serious Bug #1080874 [src:enki-aseba] Missing Build-Depends on python3-setuptools Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1080874: https://bugs.d

Processed: severity of 1080831 is serious

2025-02-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 1080831 serious Bug #1080831 [src:wimsapi] Missing Build-Depends on python3-setuptools Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1080831: https://bugs.debi

Processed: severity of 1080546 is serious

2025-02-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 1080546 serious Bug #1080546 [src:audiotools] Missing Build-Depends on python3-setuptools Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1080546: https://bugs.d

Bug#1093354: pytorch-geometric: FTBFS: Error: Python 3.13+ not yet supported for torch.compile

2025-02-22 Thread Santiago Vila
Hi. Please note that the autopkgtests for the fixed version https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/pytorch-geometric do not pass. [ Not sure if this deserves a new bug, or reopening this one, as the way it fails is very similar ]. Thanks.

Processed: 1076569

2025-02-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 1076569 important Bug #1076569 [pkg-kde-tools] When called for dh-sequence-kf6 (or --with=kf6) CMAKE Qt6 should be enforced Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' > tags 1076569 wontfix Bug #1076569 [pkg-kde-tools] When called for dh

Bug#1098562: marked as done (golang-github-protonmail-go-crypto: FTBFS: clearsign_test.go:203: cannot create key: rsa: generated p == q, random source is broken)

2025-02-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 22 Feb 2025 11:05:28 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1098562: fixed in golang-github-protonmail-go-crypto 1.1.5-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1098562, regarding golang-github-protonmail-go-crypto: FTBFS: clearsign_test.go:203: cannot create key: rsa: gene

Bug#1098661: linux: fails to boot on VisionFive 2: Unhandled exception: Store/AMO access fault

2025-02-22 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Package: src:linux Version: 6.13.3-1~exp1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-ri...@lists.debian.org Hi, Starting with version 6.13.3-1~exp1, the riscv64 kernel is shipped as a EFI binary with the payload compressed with zstd (using the EFI_ZBOOT config op

Processed: severity of 1080864 is serious

2025-02-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 1080864 serious Bug #1080864 [src:pybik] Missing Build-Depends on python3-setuptools Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1080864: https://bugs.debian

Bug#984027: marked as done (darkice: ftbfs with GCC-11)

2025-02-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 22 Feb 2025 10:49:24 + with message-id and subject line Bug#984027: fixed in darkice 1.5-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #984027, regarding darkice: ftbfs with GCC-11 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is no

Bug#1076569: When called for dh-sequence-kf6 (or --with=kf6) CMAKE Qt6 should be enforced

2025-02-22 Thread Marco Mattiolo
Tags: wontfix Severity: important thanks Hi, I took the freedom to discuss this bug in the #debian-qt-kde channel: I noticed such a flag was never set in pkg-kde-tools in the past [1], nor with KDE4, nor for KF5, then I don't get the reason KF6 should be different. It's agreed that defining the

Processed: severity of 1095914 is normal

2025-02-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 1095914 normal Bug #1095914 [libwlroots-0.18] Error: [types/output/render.c:24] output backend and allocator buffer capabilities don't match (NVIDIOUS card with the nouveau driver) Severity set to 'normal' from 'grave' > thanks Stopping

Bug#1098562: Info received (golang-golang-x-crypto-dev)

2025-02-22 Thread Martin Dosch
Ah, seems I was wrong and this is not caused by golang-golang-x-crypto-dev but ProtonMails go-crypto still uses the same function in it's fork. I just opened a PR upstream: https://github.com/ProtonMail/go-crypto/pull/276 signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#1098562: golang-golang-x-crypto-dev

2025-02-22 Thread Martin Dosch
If i read this issue [1] correct, it seems to be an issue in golang-golang-x-crypto-dev, which got fixed in version 0.30 by this patch [2]. Best regards, Martin [1] https://github.com/golang/go/issues/70682 [2] https://github.com/golang/crypto/commit/7042ebcbe097f305ba3a93f9a22b4befa4b83d29

Bug#1098622: marked as done (rasterio: FTBFS: E assert 1 == 0)

2025-02-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 22 Feb 2025 09:39:03 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1098622: fixed in rasterio 1.4.3-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1098622, regarding rasterio: FTBFS: E assert 1 == 0 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been deal

Bug#1098595: marked as done (python-click-plugins: FTBFS: test_register_and_run fails)

2025-02-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 22 Feb 2025 09:38:18 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1098595: fixed in python-click-plugins 1.1.1-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #1098595, regarding python-click-plugins: FTBFS: test_register_and_run fails to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#1098346: marked as done (rust-bounded-static: FTBFS: failures: bounded-static/src/lib.rs - (line 153))

2025-02-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 22 Feb 2025 09:39:34 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1098346: fixed in rust-bounded-static 0.8.0-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #1098346, regarding rust-bounded-static: FTBFS: failures: bounded-static/src/lib.rs - (line 153) to be marked as done. This means

Bug#1098474: marked as done (resvg: Failing autopkgtest)

2025-02-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 22 Feb 2025 09:39:17 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1098474: fixed in resvg 0.44.0-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #1098474, regarding resvg: Failing autopkgtest to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Processed (with 1 error): your mail

2025-02-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 1098570 src:objenesis Bug #1098570 [src:libhamcrest-java] libhamcrest-java: FTBFS: Could not resolve org.objenesis:objenesis:debian. Bug reassigned from package 'src:libhamcrest-java' to 'src:objenesis'. No longer marked as found in vers

Bug#1098534: marked as done ("libobjenesis-java does not declare Dependency on junit5 although its pom file requires org.junit:junit-bom")

2025-02-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 22 Feb 2025 09:08:18 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1098534: fixed in objenesis 3.4-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1098534, regarding "libobjenesis-java does not declare Dependency on junit5 although its pom file requires org.junit:junit-bom" to be marked

Bug#1098508: marked as done (adduser lacks dependency on libperl5.40 for Encode.pm)

2025-02-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 22 Feb 2025 08:56:56 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1098508: fixed in adduser 3.140 has caused the Debian Bug report #1098508, regarding adduser lacks dependency on libperl5.40 for Encode.pm to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has b

Bug#1098625: marked as done (rust-clio: FTBFS: error: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `http`)

2025-02-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 22 Feb 2025 09:09:16 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1098625: fixed in rust-clio 0.3.5-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #1098625, regarding rust-clio: FTBFS: error: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `http` to be marked as done. This means that you claim that t

Bug#1098574: marked as done (milib: FTBFS: Could not resolve org.objenesis:objenesis:debian.)

2025-02-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 22 Feb 2025 09:08:18 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1098534: fixed in objenesis 3.4-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1098534, regarding milib: FTBFS: Could not resolve org.objenesis:objenesis:debian. to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the p

Bug#1098573: marked as done (libhttp-nio-java: FTBFS: Could not resolve org.objenesis:objenesis:debian.)

2025-02-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 22 Feb 2025 09:08:18 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1098534: fixed in objenesis 3.4-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1098534, regarding libhttp-nio-java: FTBFS: Could not resolve org.objenesis:objenesis:debian. to be marked as done. This means that you clai

Bug#1098570: marked as done (libhamcrest-java: FTBFS: Could not resolve org.objenesis:objenesis:debian.)

2025-02-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 22 Feb 2025 09:08:18 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1098534: fixed in objenesis 3.4-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1098534, regarding libhamcrest-java: FTBFS: Could not resolve org.objenesis:objenesis:debian. to be marked as done. This means that you clai

Bug#1098565: marked as done (gradle: FTBFS: Could not resolve org.objenesis:objenesis:debian.)

2025-02-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 22 Feb 2025 09:08:18 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1098534: fixed in objenesis 3.4-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1098534, regarding gradle: FTBFS: Could not resolve org.objenesis:objenesis:debian. to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#1098538: marked as done (capsule-maven-nextflow: FTBFS: Could not resolve all files for configuration ':testCompileClasspath'.)

2025-02-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 22 Feb 2025 09:08:18 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1098534: fixed in objenesis 3.4-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1098534, regarding capsule-maven-nextflow: FTBFS: Could not resolve all files for configuration ':testCompileClasspath'. to be marked as done

Processed: tagging 1098611, bug 1098611 is forwarded to https://github.com/scrapy/scrapy/issues/6619

2025-02-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1098611 + upstream fixed-upstream Bug #1098611 [src:python-scrapy] python-scrapy: FTBFS: E AssertionError: 1 responses remaining in queue. Added tag(s) fixed-upstream and upstream. > forwarded 1098611 https://github.com/scrapy/scra

Bug#1098509: marked as done (adduser: Encode import is missing dependency)

2025-02-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 22 Feb 2025 08:56:56 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1098508: fixed in adduser 3.140 has caused the Debian Bug report #1098508, regarding adduser: Encode import is missing dependency to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

  1   2   >