Bug#1095376: the cause of this

2025-02-08 Thread Russell Coker
The command "python3 -bb -t -t -E -W error support/validate-appconfig.py -c / usr/bin/chkcon -l -s -v -x tmp/appconfig tmp/policy.bin" is crashing. Here's a backtrace: #0 0x005378ee in _PyObject_New () #1 0x7763919f in SWIG_Python_newvarlink () at ./src/ selinuxswig_python_wrap

Bug#1092530: daemontools: diff for NMU version 1:0.76-13.1

2025-02-08 Thread Joost van Baal-Ilić
Hi David, Thank you! Bye, Joost On Sat, Feb 08, 2025 at 09:05:34PM -0400, David Bremner wrote: > Control: tags 1092530 + patch > Control: tags 1092530 + pending > > Dear maintainer, > > I've prepared an NMU for daemontools (versioned as 1:0.76-13.1) and > uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel

Bug#1094706: xrayutilities: FTBFS with numpy 2.x: `np.asfarray` was removed in the NumPy 2.0 release

2025-02-08 Thread Stuart Prescott
The actual bug looks to be in lmfit-py not in xrayutilities. With an upgraded lmfit-py package from experimental, this bug is not observed, with the package building successfully and autopkgtest tests passing. lmfit-py version 1.3, now in experimentl, is needed for numpy 2 compatibility, it ne

Bug#1095023: marked as done (lmfit-py: autopkgtests fail with numpy 2.x)

2025-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 09 Feb 2025 05:49:49 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1095023: fixed in lmfit-py 1.3.2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1095023, regarding lmfit-py: autopkgtests fail with numpy 2.x to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been deal

Bug#1000129: marked as done (maildrop: depends on obsolete pcre3 library)

2025-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 09 Feb 2025 05:04:19 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1000129: fixed in maildrop 3.1.8-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1000129, regarding maildrop: depends on obsolete pcre3 library to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dea

Bug#1068031: marked as done (FTBFS: checking for locking method... configure: error: fcntl test failed)

2025-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 09 Feb 2025 05:04:19 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1068031: fixed in maildrop 3.1.8-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1068031, regarding FTBFS: checking for locking method... configure: error: fcntl test failed to be marked as done. This means that you clai

Bug#1095290: marked as done (macaulay's autopkg tests fail on i386 and s390x)

2025-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 09 Feb 2025 04:05:45 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1095290: fixed in macaulay2 1.24.11+ds-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #1095290, regarding macaulay's autopkg tests fail on i386 and s390x to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem ha

Bug#1093938: marked as done (rust-test-case: FTBFS: no matching package named `test-case-macros` found)

2025-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 09 Feb 2025 03:40:00 +0100 with message-id <173906880047.2664089.14684633155875606...@cairon.jones.dk> and subject line Re: Bug#1093938: rust-test-case: FTBFS: no matching package named `test-case-macros` found has caused the Debian Bug report #1093938, regarding rust-test-

Bug#1093939: marked as done (rust-wasmtime: FTBFS: no matching package named `codespan-reporting` found)

2025-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 09 Feb 2025 03:40:58 +0100 with message-id <173906885811.2664089.587207499680007...@cairon.jones.dk> and subject line Re: Bug#1093939: rust-wasmtime: FTBFS: no matching package named `codespan-reporting` found has caused the Debian Bug report #1093939, regarding rust-wasmti

Processed: block 1093933 with 1094199

2025-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 1093933 with 1094199 Bug #1093933 [src:rust-axum] rust-axum: FTBFS: no matching package found - searched package name: `axum` 1093933 was not blocked by any bugs. 1093933 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 1093933: 109419

Processed: block 1093934 with 1094199

2025-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 1093934 with 1094199 Bug #1093934 [src:rust-bounded-static] rust-bounded-static: FTBFS: no matching package named `bounded-static` found 1093934 was not blocked by any bugs. 1093934 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 109393

Processed: reopening 1094199, affects 1094199 ...

2025-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reopen 1094199 Bug #1094199 {Done: Jonas Smedegaard } [dh-rust] dh-rust: installs lib crates in non-deterministic and fallable order 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; all fixed versions will be cleared, and

Processed: severity of 1094199 is important

2025-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 1094199 important Bug #1094199 [dh-rust] dh-rust: cannot install lib crates with cyclic dependencies Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1094199: ht

Processed: tagging 1094199

2025-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1094199 - patch Bug #1094199 [dh-rust] dh-rust: cannot install lib crates with cyclic dependencies Removed tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1094199: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-b

Bug#1095538: xemacs21: Uses autoconf2.13 which is being remove from Debian

2025-02-08 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Source: xemacs21 Version: 21.4.24-12 Severity: serious Control: block 1081135 by -1 xemacs21 uses autoconf2.13 which is ancient and is being removed from Debian. Please switch to autoconf instead. Thank you, Jeremy Bícha

Processed: xemacs21: Uses autoconf2.13 which is being remove from Debian

2025-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > block 1081135 by -1 Bug #1081135 [ftp.debian.org] RM: autoconf2.13 -- RoQA; severely outdated package 1081135 was blocked by: 343083 1036764 1081135 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 1081135: 1095538 -- 1081135: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bu

Processed: 389-ds-base: Depends on rust-ahash-0.7 which is being removed from Debian

2025-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > block 1094918 by -1 Bug #1094918 [ftp.debian.org] RM: librust-ahash-0.7-dev -- ROM; obsoleted by librust-ahash-dev 1094918 was not blocked by any bugs. 1094918 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 1094918: 1095537 > affects -1 src:rust-ahash-0.7 Bug #

Bug#1095537: 389-ds-base: Depends on rust-ahash-0.7 which is being removed from Debian

2025-02-08 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Source: 389-ds-base Version: 3.1.1+dfsg1-3 Severity: serious X-Debbugs-CC: tjaal...@debian.org, d...@jones.dk Control: block 1094918 by -1 Control: affects -1 src:rust-ahash-0.7 389-ds-base has been removed from Testing because it uses rust-ahash-0.7 which has been removed from Testing and will be

Processed: daemontools: diff for NMU version 1:0.76-13.1

2025-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags 1092530 + patch Bug #1092530 [src:daemontools] daemontools: FTBFS: make[2]: *** [Makefile:168: hasshsgr.h] Error 1 Added tag(s) patch. > tags 1092530 + pending Bug #1092530 [src:daemontools] daemontools: FTBFS: make[2]: *** [Makefile:168: hasshsgr.h] Error 1 A

Bug#1092530: daemontools: diff for NMU version 1:0.76-13.1

2025-02-08 Thread David Bremner
Control: tags 1092530 + patch Control: tags 1092530 + pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for daemontools (versioned as 1:0.76-13.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to cancel it if you prefer to fix the bug yourself. Regards. David Bremner diff -Nru daemontools-0.76/deb

Bug#1095334: marked as done (castle-model-viewer: FTBFS: Fatal: Can't find unit CastleUtils used by castle_model_converter)

2025-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 09 Feb 2025 00:34:22 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1095334: fixed in castle-model-viewer 5.2.0-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1095334, regarding castle-model-viewer: FTBFS: Fatal: Can't find unit CastleUtils used by castle_model_converter to be marked as

Bug#1094938: marked as done (ibm-3270: FTBFS: AssertionError: 2104598264 not less than 2000000000.0 : Port 44233 is not bound)

2025-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 09 Feb 2025 00:05:59 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1094938: fixed in ibm-3270 4.3ga10-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1094938, regarding ibm-3270: FTBFS: AssertionError: 2104598264 not less than 20.0 : Port 44233 is not bound to be marked as done.

Bug#1092228: marked as done (jwm: FTBFS with gettext 0.23.x)

2025-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 08 Feb 2025 23:49:14 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1092228: fixed in jwm 2.4.6-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1092228, regarding jwm: FTBFS with gettext 0.23.x to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this i

Bug#1095535: kde-config-systemd: Outdated, not compatible with plasma 6

2025-02-08 Thread john
Package: kde-config-systemd Version: 1.2.1-3.3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable X-Debbugs-Cc: johnny.faul...@yahoo.com Dear Maintainer, kde-config-systemd no longer works in plasma 6. If this ships in trixie, it will be unusable. Currently does not work or show up at all

Processed: Re: Bug#1082570: libportal: FTBFS with segfault during TestInputCapture, reliably on AWS but rarely elsewhere

2025-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > retitle -1 libportal: FTBFS with segfault during TestInputCapture, reliably > on AWS but rarely elsewhere Bug #1082570 [src:libportal] libportal: intermittent FTBFS: Segmentation fault in pytest Changed Bug title to 'libportal: FTBFS with segfault during TestInputC

Bug#1082570: libportal: FTBFS with segfault during TestInputCapture, reliably on AWS but rarely elsewhere

2025-02-08 Thread Simon McVittie
Control: retitle -1 libportal: FTBFS with segfault during TestInputCapture, reliably on AWS but rarely elsewhere On Sat, 08 Feb 2025 at 18:13:59 +0100, Santiago Vila wrote: > El 8/2/25 a las 16:10, Simon McVittie escribió: > > > Now this is failing 100% of the time at least > > > on AWS instances

Bug#1094528: marked as done (remctl: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:29: override_dh_autoreconf] Error 255)

2025-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 08 Feb 2025 22:51:39 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1094528: fixed in remctl 3.18-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1094528, regarding remctl: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:29: override_dh_autoreconf] Error 255 to be marked as done. This means that you c

Bug#1094515: marked as done (ruby-raindrops: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby3.3" failed: :136:in `require': cannot load such file -- ra

2025-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 08 Feb 2025 22:51:50 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1094515: fixed in ruby-raindrops 0.20.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1094515, regarding ruby-raindrops: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby3.3" failed: :136:in `require': cannot load such file -- rack/lobster (Lo

Bug#1094355: marked as done (adun.app: FTBFS with the GNUstep multiarch layout: hard codes paths in debian/rules)

2025-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 08 Feb 2025 22:34:39 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1094355: fixed in adun.app 0.81-15 has caused the Debian Bug report #1094355, regarding adun.app: FTBFS with the GNUstep multiarch layout: hard codes paths in debian/rules to be marked as done. This means tha

Bug#1094515: marked as pending in ruby-raindrops

2025-02-08 Thread Cédric Boutillier
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1094515 in ruby-raindrops reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-raindrops/-/commit/aaccb766956ef6e7

Processed: Bug#1094515 marked as pending in ruby-raindrops

2025-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1094515 [src:ruby-raindrops] ruby-raindrops: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby3.3" failed: :136:in `require': cannot load such file -- rack/lobster (LoadError) Added tag(s) pending. -- 1094515: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1094515

Processed: Re: src:rust-zoxide: fails to migrate to testing for too long

2025-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + pending Bug #1095528 {Done: Paul Gevers } [src:rust-zoxide] src:rust-zoxide: fails to migrate to testing for too long Added tag(s) pending. -- 1095528: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1095528 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bug

Bug#1095510: marked as done (sos: sosreport has the same version as the package already in the archive)

2025-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 08 Feb 2025 21:51:22 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1095510: fixed in sos 4.8.2-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #1095510, regarding sos: sosreport has the same version as the package already in the archive to be marked as done. This means that you claim tha

Bug#1095176: marked as done (pcs: FTBFS in unstable: tests failures)

2025-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 08 Feb 2025 21:49:40 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1095176: fixed in pcs 0.11.7-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1095176, regarding pcs: FTBFS in unstable: tests failures to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#1095183: marked as done (pcs: autopkgtest fails in unstable)

2025-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 08 Feb 2025 21:49:40 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1095183: fixed in pcs 0.11.7-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1095183, regarding pcs: autopkgtest fails in unstable to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If t

Bug#1095528: src:rust-zoxide: fails to migrate to testing for too long

2025-02-08 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: rust-zoxide Version: 0.9.4-2 Severity: serious Control: close -1 0.9.6-1 Tags: sid trixie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: out-of-sync Dear maintainer(s), The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing and unstable for more than 30 days as

Processed: src:python-ly: fails to migrate to testing for too long

2025-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > close -1 0.9.9-2 Bug #1095526 [src:python-ly] src:python-ly: fails to migrate to testing for too long The source 'python-ly' and version '0.9.9-2' do not appear to match any binary packages Marked as fixed in versions python-ly/0.9.9-2. Bug #1095526 [src:python-ly]

Processed: src:rust-zoxide: fails to migrate to testing for too long

2025-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > close -1 0.9.6-1 Bug #1095528 [src:rust-zoxide] src:rust-zoxide: fails to migrate to testing for too long Marked as fixed in versions rust-zoxide/0.9.6-1. Bug #1095528 [src:rust-zoxide] src:rust-zoxide: fails to migrate to testing for too long Marked Bug as done -

Processed: src:yadifa: fails to migrate to testing for too long

2025-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > close -1 3.0.0-1 Bug #1095527 [src:yadifa] src:yadifa: fails to migrate to testing for too long Marked as fixed in versions yadifa/3.0.0-1. Bug #1095527 [src:yadifa] src:yadifa: fails to migrate to testing for too long Marked Bug as done -- 1095527: https://bugs.de

Bug#1095527: src:yadifa: fails to migrate to testing for too long

2025-02-08 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: yadifa Version: 2.6.7-1 Severity: serious Control: close -1 3.0.0-1 Tags: sid trixie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: out-of-sync Dear maintainer(s), The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing and unstable for more than 30 days as havi

Bug#1095526: src:python-ly: fails to migrate to testing for too long

2025-02-08 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: python-ly Version: 0.9.7-1 Severity: serious Control: close -1 0.9.9-2 Tags: sid trixie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: out-of-sync Dear maintainer(s), The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing and unstable for more than 30 days as h

Bug#1095402: marked as done (pam-pkcs11: CVE-2025-24531)

2025-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 08 Feb 2025 21:34:16 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1095402: fixed in pam-pkcs11 0.6.13-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1095402, regarding pam-pkcs11: CVE-2025-24531 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If th

Bug#1095088: marked as done (python-deeptools: autopkgtests fail with numpy 2.x)

2025-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 08 Feb 2025 21:34:39 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1095088: fixed in python-deeptools 3.5.6+dfsg-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1095088, regarding python-deeptools: autopkgtests fail with numpy 2.x to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#1095373: marked as done (python-mrcz: FTBFS: AttributeError: module 'numpy' has no attribute 'product')

2025-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 08 Feb 2025 21:09:59 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1095373: fixed in python-mrcz 0.5.7-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1095373, regarding python-mrcz: FTBFS: AttributeError: module 'numpy' has no attribute 'product' to be marked as done. This means that y

Bug#1095462: marked as done (sysprof :FTBFS:build failed ( error: ‘PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK’ undeclared (first use in this function)))

2025-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 08 Feb 2025 21:12:29 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1095462: fixed in sysprof 48~beta-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1095462, regarding sysprof :FTBFS:build failed ( error: ‘PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK’ undeclared (first use in this function)) to be marked as d

Bug#1095448: marked as done (sysprof: Fails to build on most architectures)

2025-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 08 Feb 2025 21:12:29 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1095448: fixed in sysprof 48~beta-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1095448, regarding sysprof: Fails to build on most architectures to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#1095462: marked as pending in sysprof

2025-02-08 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1095462 in sysprof reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/sysprof/-/commit/8a099ee5698a0b4aee392e6d1a04b

Processed: Bug#1095448 marked as pending in sysprof

2025-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1095448 [src:sysprof] sysprof: Fails to build on most architectures Added tag(s) pending. -- 1095448: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1095448 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Bug#1095462 marked as pending in sysprof

2025-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1095462 [src:sysprof] sysprof :FTBFS:build failed ( error: ‘PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK’ undeclared (first use in this function)) Added tag(s) pending. -- 1095462: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1095462 Debian Bug Tracking System

Bug#1095448: marked as pending in sysprof

2025-02-08 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1095448 in sysprof reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/sysprof/-/commit/8a099ee5698a0b4aee392e6d1a04b

Bug#1094898: context: mtxrun running fails

2025-02-08 Thread Arthur Marsh
Hi, could the bug actually be in the dynamic linking process? I was using binutils 2.41-1. Arthur. On 9 February 2025 1:58:41 am ACDT, "Hilmar Preuße" wrote: >On 07.02.25 06:45, Arthur Marsh wrote: > >Hello Arthur, > >> *** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate

Bug#1086145: sysprof: error "Failure: Failed to authorize user credentials"

2025-02-08 Thread Jeremy Bícha
On Sun, Jan 19, 2025 at 9:19 PM Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2025-01-19 20:16:11 -0500, Jeremy Bícha wrote: > > Like you could start with Debian in a VM. What are the steps to > > experience the same issue? > > Possibly not needed for the moment, but documentation to do that > would be welcome. I'v

Bug#1095368: marked as done (pyscanfcs: FTBFS: E OverflowError: Python integer 65536 out of bounds for uint16)

2025-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 08 Feb 2025 20:43:04 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1095368: fixed in pyscanfcs 0.3.6+ds-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #1095368, regarding pyscanfcs: FTBFS: E OverflowError: Python integer 65536 out of bounds for uint16 to be marked as done. Thi

Bug#1095361: marked as done (nxmx: FTBFS: E AttributeError: `np.string_` was removed in the NumPy 2.0 release.)

2025-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 08 Feb 2025 20:42:56 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1095361: fixed in nxmx 0.0.4-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1095361, regarding nxmx: FTBFS: E AttributeError: `np.string_` was removed in the NumPy 2.0 release. to be marked as done. This means

Bug#1095282: marked as done (pyscanfcs: missing dependency on numpy abi)

2025-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 08 Feb 2025 20:43:04 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1095282: fixed in pyscanfcs 0.3.6+ds-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #1095282, regarding pyscanfcs: missing dependency on numpy abi to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Processed: Bug#1095368 marked as pending in pyscanfcs

2025-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1095368 [src:pyscanfcs] pyscanfcs: FTBFS: E OverflowError: Python integer 65536 out of bounds for uint16 Added tag(s) pending. -- 1095368: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1095368 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow

Processed: Bug#1095282 marked as pending in pyscanfcs

2025-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1095282 [src:pyscanfcs] pyscanfcs: missing dependency on numpy abi Added tag(s) pending. -- 1095282: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1095282 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1095368: marked as pending in pyscanfcs

2025-02-08 Thread Étienne Mollier
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1095368 in pyscanfcs reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/pyscanfcs/-/commit/9b3b869e6e05de9080fdb2eb18e

Bug#1095282: marked as pending in pyscanfcs

2025-02-08 Thread Étienne Mollier
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1095282 in pyscanfcs reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/pyscanfcs/-/commit/9ea024e5c6facb70d2792ef04bf

Bug#1094537: marked as done (ruby-marcel: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby3.3" failed.)

2025-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 08 Feb 2025 18:50:40 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1094537: fixed in ruby-marcel 1.0.4+dfsg-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1094537, regarding ruby-marcel: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby3.3" failed. to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the proble

Bug#1095285: marked as done (tiddit: missing dependency on numpy abi)

2025-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 08 Feb 2025 18:50:47 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1095285: fixed in tiddit 3.6.1+dfsg-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1095285, regarding tiddit: missing dependency on numpy abi to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been deal

Processed: Bug#1094537 marked as pending in ruby-marcel

2025-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1094537 [src:ruby-marcel] ruby-marcel: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby3.3" failed. Added tag(s) pending. -- 1094537: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1094537 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1094537: marked as pending in ruby-marcel

2025-02-08 Thread Cédric Boutillier
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1094537 in ruby-marcel reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-marcel/-/commit/4a0bce2f1564f807c623cb

Bug#1095397: vdr-plugin-remote: FTBFS: error: invalid new-expression of abstract class type 'cLircRemote'

2025-02-08 Thread Marko Mäkelä
Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 12:13:22PM +, Santiago Vila wrote: Package: src:vdr-plugin-remote Version: 0.7.0-6 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs trixie sid Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build: I may be responsible for this, because I implemente

Bug#1068032: marked as done (FTBFS: error: implicit declaration of function ‘FreeTextEvent’)

2025-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 08 Feb 2025 18:04:56 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1068032: fixed in stimfit 0.16.5-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1068032, regarding FTBFS: error: implicit declaration of function ‘FreeTextEvent’ to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the p

Bug#1095518: FTBFS: needs to depend explicitly on binutils-gold

2025-02-08 Thread NoisyCoil
Source: llvm-toolchain-19 Version: 1:19.1.7-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs patch Justification: RT X-Debbugs-Cc: noisyc...@tutanota.com Dear Maintainer, starting from 2.43.90.20250202-1, binutils now suggests binutils-gold instead of depending on it [1]. As a consequence llvm must now depend exp

Bug#1095285: marked as pending in tiddit

2025-02-08 Thread Étienne Mollier
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1095285 in tiddit reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/tiddit/-/commit/d67fd01ea0dc6140fd71e03b22ce6380c

Processed: Bug#1095285 marked as pending in tiddit

2025-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1095285 [src:tiddit] tiddit: missing dependency on numpy abi Added tag(s) pending. -- 1095285: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1095285 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1093147: marked as done (elixir-lang:FTBFS:build failed ([31m** (ExUnit.TimeoutError) test timed out after 60000ms))

2025-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 08 Feb 2025 17:49:43 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1093147: fixed in elixir-lang 1.18.1.dfsg-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1093147, regarding elixir-lang:FTBFS:build failed ([31m** (ExUnit.TimeoutError) test timed out after 6ms) to be marked as don

Bug#1095444: marked as done (libqt5core5t64: Crash quiterss at startup in getFeedThread)

2025-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 08 Feb 2025 17:29:03 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1095423: fixed in qtbase-opensource-src 5.15.15+dfsg-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #1095423, regarding libqt5core5t64: Crash quiterss at startup in getFeedThread to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#1095443: marked as done (Segmentation fault in KeepassXC when retrieving credentials via browser extension)

2025-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 08 Feb 2025 17:29:03 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1095423: fixed in qtbase-opensource-src 5.15.15+dfsg-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #1095423, regarding Segmentation fault in KeepassXC when retrieving credentials via browser extension to be marked as don

Bug#1095423: marked as done (libqt5core5t64: Keepassxc crash after latest update when accessed from browser)

2025-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 08 Feb 2025 17:29:03 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1095423: fixed in qtbase-opensource-src 5.15.15+dfsg-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #1095423, regarding libqt5core5t64: Keepassxc crash after latest update when accessed from browser to be marked as done.

Bug#1068032: stimfit 0.16.4-1.1 packaged for debian

2025-02-08 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Am Sa., 8. Feb. 2025 um 07:58 Uhr schrieb Christoph Schmidt-Hieber : > > > > On 7 Feb 2025, at 22:22, Matthias Klumpp wrote: > > > > Am Fr., 7. Feb. 2025 um 20:32 Uhr schrieb Christoph Schmidt-Hieber > > : > >> > >> See changes here: > >> https://github.com/neurodroid/stimfit/commit/7941cd06 > >>

Bug#1082570: libportal: intermittent FTBFS: Segmentation fault in pytest

2025-02-08 Thread Santiago Vila
El 8/2/25 a las 16:10, Simon McVittie escribió: Now this is failing 100% of the time at least on AWS instances of type m7a.large and r7a.large (having 2 CPUs) Please share a log for the particular test failure you are experiencing here? It might be a recurrence of #1082570 (a segmentation fault

Processed: transition: netcdf

2025-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > affects -1 + src:netcdf Bug #1095511 [release.debian.org] transition: netcdf Added indication that 1095511 affects src:netcdf > forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-netcdf.html Bug #1095511 [release.debian.org] transition: netcdf Set Bug forw

Bug#1095510: sos: sosreport has the same version as the package already in the archive

2025-02-08 Thread Adrian Bunk
Source: sos Version: 4.8.2-3 Severity: critical X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-wb-t...@lists.debian.org, sosreport Dev Team , Chris Hofstaedtler sos (4.8.2-3) unstable; urgency=medium * Change package name to sos (Closes: #1092585) * Add new sosreport transitional package ... (At least) wanna-buil

Bug#1092540: marked as done (python-ly: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [Makefile:53: html] Error 2)

2025-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 08 Feb 2025 16:18:55 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1092540: fixed in python-ly 0.9.9-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1092540, regarding python-ly: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [Makefile:53: html] Error 2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the prob

Processed: Bug#1095423 marked as pending in qtbase-opensource-src

2025-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1095423 [libqt5core5t64] libqt5core5t64: Keepassxc crash after latest update when accessed from browser Bug #1095443 [libqt5core5t64] Segmentation fault in KeepassXC when retrieving credentials via browser extension Bug #1095444 [libqt5core5t64]

Bug#1094898: context: mtxrun running fails

2025-02-08 Thread Hilmar Preuße
On 07.02.25 06:45, Arthur Marsh wrote: Hello Arthur, *** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate *** * What led up to the situation? Not sure, but getting the illegal instruction error on mtxrun --generate as others have reported, and building and installing

Bug#1095423: marked as pending in qtbase-opensource-src

2025-02-08 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1095423 in qtbase-opensource-src reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/qt-kde-team/qt/qtbase/-/commit/53c986dbcca3

Processed: Re: Bug#1082570: libportal: intermittent FTBFS: Segmentation fault in pytest

2025-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > clone 1082570 -2 Bug #1082570 [src:libportal] libportal: intermittent FTBFS: Segmentation fault in pytest Bug 1082570 cloned as bug 1095505 > retitle -2 libportal: FTBFS: TestRemoteDesktop::test_create_session: assert > create_session_done_invoked Bug #1095505 [src

Bug#1082570: libportal: intermittent FTBFS: Segmentation fault in pytest

2025-02-08 Thread Simon McVittie
Control: clone 1082570 -2 Control: retitle -2 libportal: FTBFS: TestRemoteDesktop::test_create_session: assert create_session_done_invoked On Fri, 07 Feb 2025 at 19:26:17 +0100, Santiago Vila wrote: > Now this is failing 100% of the time at least > on AWS instances of type m7a.large and r7a.large

Bug#1095502: autopkgtest broken with ruby-sprockets 4

2025-02-08 Thread Pirate Praveen
Package: ruby-rails-assets-autosize Version: 4.0.2-7 Severity: serious X-Debbugs-Cc: prav...@debian.org full log https://ci.debian.net/packages/r/ruby-rails-assets- autosize/testing/amd64/57520645/ Fix is easy like ruby-jquery-rails, but we can remove this package. -- System Information: Debian

Bug#1095493: reprepro: Secondary index inconsistent with primary

2025-02-08 Thread Slavko
On Sat, 8 Feb 2025 14:02:37 +0100 Slavko wrote: > after upgrade od reprepro in trixie i noticed this at add (new > version) package: > > Error: database uses deprecated format. > Please run translatelegacyreferences to update to the new format > first. There have been errors! > I tried

Bug#1095120: marked as pending in plasma-workspace

2025-02-08 Thread Patrick Franz
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1095120 in plasma-workspace reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/qt-kde-team/kde/plasma-workspace/-/commit/80ac99

Bug#1095120: marked as done (plasma-workspace: Non-existing Build-Depends)

2025-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 08 Feb 2025 14:53:37 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1095120: fixed in plasma-workspace 4:6.2.5-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1095120, regarding plasma-workspace: Non-existing Build-Depends to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem h

Processed: Bug#1095120 marked as pending in plasma-workspace

2025-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1095120 {Done: Patrick Franz } [src:plasma-workspace] plasma-workspace: Non-existing Build-Depends Added tag(s) pending. -- 1095120: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1095120 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.

Bug#1095499: autopkgtest ruby-sprockets 4

2025-02-08 Thread Pirate Praveen
Package: ruby-rails-assets-emojione Version: 2.2.6-7 Severity: serious X-Debbugs-Cc: prav...@debian.org full log https://ci.debian.net/packages/r/ruby-rails-assets- emojione/testing/amd64/57520646/ -- System Information: Debian Release: trixie/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testi

Bug#1095120: marked as pending in plasma-workspace

2025-02-08 Thread Patrick Franz
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1095120 in plasma-workspace reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/qt-kde-team/kde/plasma-workspace/-/commit/80ac99

Bug#1095334: [Pkg-pascal-devel] Bug#1095334: castle-model-viewer: FTBFS: Fatal: Can't find unit CastleUtils used by castle_model_converter

2025-02-08 Thread Abou Al Montacir
Hi Santiago, On Fri, 2025-02-07 at 12:11 +, Santiago Vila wrote: > Recompiling CastleUtils, checksum changed for /usr/lib/x86_64-linux- > gnu/fpc/3.2.2/units/x86_64-linux/rtl/sysutils.ppu > /<>/castle_model_converter.dpr(47,3) Fatal: Can't find unit > CastleUtils used by castle_model_converter

Processed: Bug#1095120 marked as pending in plasma-workspace

2025-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1095120 [src:plasma-workspace] plasma-workspace: Non-existing Build-Depends Added tag(s) pending. -- 1095120: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1095120 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1020500: glibc: flaky autopkgtest on armel: multiple different failures

2025-02-08 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Hi Paul, On 2025-01-11 09:51, Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi Aurelien, > > On Tue, 11 Oct 2022 23:48:15 +0200 Aurelien Jarno > wrote: > > A small update on this bug. Now that glibc 2.35-3 migrated to testing, > > the only unsolved issue is that one: > > > > On 2022-10-07 21:14, Paul Gevers wrote: > >

Processed: Re: vino: unmaintained upstream

2025-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #972129 [src:vino] vino: unmaintained upstream Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' -- 972129: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=972129 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: bug 1092540 is forwarded to https://github.com/frescobaldi/python-ly/issues/176

2025-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 1092540 https://github.com/frescobaldi/python-ly/issues/176 Bug #1092540 [src:python-ly] python-ly: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [Makefile:53: html] Error 2 Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://github.com/frescobaldi/python-ly/issues/176'.

Processed: severity of 1095495 is grave

2025-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 1095495 grave Bug #1095495 [xdot] xdot: Segmentation fault on start Severity set to 'grave' from 'important' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1095495: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrep

Bug#1079336: marked as done (vdr-plugin-skinenigmang: FTBFS with newer imagemagick7)

2025-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 08 Feb 2025 13:21:46 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1079336: fixed in vdr-plugin-skinenigmang 0.1.5-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1079336, regarding vdr-plugin-skinenigmang: FTBFS with newer imagemagick7 to be marked as done. This means that you claim tha

Processed: tagging 1091140

2025-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1091140 + pending Bug #1091140 [src:calligra] calligra: FTBFS: dh_install: error: missing files, aborting Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1091140: https://bugs.debian.or

Processed: tagging 1086480

2025-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1086480 + pending Bug #1086480 [src:calligra] calligra: kdiagram transition Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1086480: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=108

Bug#1095491: autopkgtest regression with ruby-sprockets 4

2025-02-08 Thread Pirate Praveen
Package: ruby-rails-assets-favico.js Version: 0.3.10+dfsg-3 Severity: serious X-Debbugs-Cc: prav...@debian.org Blocking ruby-sprockets 4/ruby-rack 3 migration. -- System Information: Debian Release: trixie/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (100, 'unstable') Architecture:

Processed: Re: Bug#1095111: python3-apt must be installed and visible rom /usr/bin/python3

2025-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reassign -1 libapt-pkg6.0t64 Bug #1095111 [ansible-core] python3-apt must be installed and visible rom /usr/bin/python3 Bug reassigned from package 'ansible-core' to 'libapt-pkg6.0t64'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #1095111 to the same values pre

  1   2   >