Yeah, I think I know what you feel...
Just after this bug appeared (when there was an update on Debian testing
from kernel 6.11 to 6.12) at first we need to wait for Nvidia to fix that.
Now it's done, so... we need to patiently wait for this package
Maintainers to make it available in Debian re
Your message dated Tue, 28 Jan 2025 07:26:55 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1091293: fixed in haskell-warp 3.3.31-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1091293,
regarding haskell-warp: FTBFS on armhf: make: ***
[/usr/share/cdbs/1/class/hlibrary.mk:163: check-ghc-stamp] Error 25
to be ma
On Mon, 27 Jan 2025 10:06:32 +0100 Bas Couwenberg
wrote:
Source: pylibtiff
Version: 0.6.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream ftbfs
Justification: makes the package in question unusable or mostly so
Control: block 1082237 by -1
Dear Maintainer,
Your package FTBFS during the numpy2 transition:
Your message dated Tue, 28 Jan 2025 09:07:13 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1094359: spglib: autopkgtest failure blocking ruby3.3
transition
has caused the Debian Bug report #1094359,
regarding spglib: autopkgtest failure blocking ruby3.3 transition
to be marked as done.
This mea
Your message dated Tue, 28 Jan 2025 06:20:46 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1068202: fixed in bazel-bootstrap 4.2.3+ds-10
has caused the Debian Bug report #1068202,
regarding bazel-bootstrap: FTBFS: /usr/include/absl/base/policy_checks.h:79:2:
error: #error "C++ versions less than C++
Your message dated Tue, 28 Jan 2025 06:20:46 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1084551: fixed in bazel-bootstrap 4.2.3+ds-10
has caused the Debian Bug report #1084551,
regarding bazel-bootstrap: removal of Python standard libraries in Python 3.13
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Tue, 28 Jan 2025 06:20:46 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1057490: fixed in bazel-bootstrap 4.2.3+ds-10
has caused the Debian Bug report #1057490,
regarding bazel-bootstrap: FTBFS with default Java 21
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 1091293 https://github.com/yesodweb/wai/issues/854
Bug #1091293 [src:haskell-warp] haskell-warp: FTBFS on armhf: make: ***
[/usr/share/cdbs/1/class/hlibrary.mk:163: check-ghc-stamp] Error 25
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://gith
Your message dated Tue, 28 Jan 2025 05:41:16 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1089409: fixed in pcp 6.3.3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1089409,
regarding pcp: Supporting rootless builds by default
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit
Your message dated Tue, 28 Jan 2025 05:41:16 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1071103: fixed in pcp 6.3.3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1071103,
regarding pcp: fails to install: chown: cannot access '/var/run/pcp': No such
file or directory
to be marked as done.
This means that y
Your message dated Tue, 28 Jan 2025 03:26:21 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1091736: fixed in ruby-moneta 1.6.0-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1091736,
regarding ruby-moneta: FTBFS with ruby3.3: ERROR: Test "ruby3.3" failed.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
On Fri, 17 Jan 2025 16:44:08 +0100 Axel Ludszuweit <
axel.ludszuw...@htp-tel.de> wrote:
> I found the release notes under
>
> https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/drivers/details/238990/
>
> and tab "Release Highlights"
>
Please forgive my ignorance, but how can I get this updated driver? I tried
to upgra
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> clone 1094419 -1
Bug #1094419 [rust-serde-yml] rust-serde-yml - serious concerns about these
forks.
Bug 1094419 cloned as bug 1094422
> reassign -1 rust-libyml
Bug #1094422 [rust-serde-yml] rust-serde-yml - serious concerns about these
forks.
Bu
Package: elpa-dape
Version: 0.21.0-1
Severity: grave
k4r4b3y on IRC reported that the current elpa-dape is having the issue
described in this upstream issue[1]. Due to a limitation of package
version handling[2], dh-elpa detects that jsonrpc is shipped with Emacs
and considered the dependency as
Package: rust-serde-yml
Severity: serious
(I will be cloning this bug against rust-libyml once I have a bug number)
rust-serde-yml is a fork of rust-serde-yaml and rust-libyml is
a fork of rust-unsafe-libyaml.
Serious concerns have been raised about the quality of code in
rust-serde-yml.
https
Did the ownership of /tmp change? I would expect that directory to be
owned by root. I'm unable to reproduce this failure on my sid test vm
(where /tmp is owned by root and permissioned 1777). But I can
reproduce it if I chown /tmp to bin or somesuch.
The failed tests show this error which
It's not going to be tonight, because my first few attempts didn't work.
If current Salsa builds, I intend to upload it in the morning.
(It did get far enough to find that there are two new test failures, one
that should now be fixed and one that I'll file a separate bug about.)
Hi Lucas, thanks for the report.
This looks to be due to newer poetry versions requiring the project.name field.
I have uploaded a patched version to Debian Mentors and reached out to my
sponsor for an upload.
https://mentors.debian.net/package/anytree/
Thanks,
Mitchell Augustin
--
Control: tags -1 + patch
Hi gregor, Hi David,
gregor herrmann, on 2025-01-27:
> I got curious and had a brief look:
> There's update-perl-sax-parsers in libxml-sax-perl which handles the
> various parsers:
[…]
> And XML::SAX::PurePerl is mentioned first; and XML::SAX::Expat should
> be the one wh
Your message dated Mon, 27 Jan 2025 22:06:55 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1093338: fixed in libbio-eutilities-perl 1.77-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1093338,
regarding libbio-eutilities-perl: FTBFS: Failed 8/20 test programs. 0/174
subtests failed.
to be marked as done.
This
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1093338 in libbio-eutilities-perl reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/perl-team/modules/packages/libbio-eutiliti
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1093338 [src:libbio-eutilities-perl] libbio-eutilities-perl: FTBFS: Failed
8/20 test programs. 0/174 subtests failed.
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1093338: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1093338
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
On Mon, 27 Jan 2025 22:18:23 +0100, Étienne Mollier wrote:
> Thanks for noticing this, I see libxml-sax-perl gets pulled by
> libxml-simple-perl; one of the packages libxml-libxml-perl or
> libxml-sax-expat-perl is supposed to get installed aside, but
> for some reason, the PurePerl implementation
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 1082622 grave
Bug #1082622 [netpbm] multiple patches for fixing autogenerated manpages by
patching output instead of generator
Bug #659172 [netpbm] multiple patches for fixing autogenerated manpages by
patching output instead of generat
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + patch
Bug #1093338 [src:libbio-eutilities-perl] libbio-eutilities-perl: FTBFS: Failed
8/20 test programs. 0/174 subtests failed.
Added tag(s) patch.
--
1093338: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1093338
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Your message dated Mon, 27 Jan 2025 21:10:39 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1094181: fixed in sus 8.20250127
has caused the Debian Bug report #1094181,
regarding susv5: installation failure
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this i
Your message dated Mon, 27 Jan 2025 21:09:04 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1094026: fixed in restrictedpython 8.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1094026,
regarding restrictedpython: CVE-2025-22153
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi
Your message dated Mon, 27 Jan 2025 21:07:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1094057: fixed in python-easydev 0.13.3+dfsg1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1094057,
regarding python-easydev: FTBFS: RuntimeError: The Poetry configuration is
invalid:
to be marked as done.
This means
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 serious
Bug #1091502 [src:libsoup2.4] libsoup2.4: will FTBFS during trixie support
period
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
--
1091502: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1091502
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1094026 [src:restrictedpython] restrictedpython: CVE-2025-22153
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1094026: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1094026
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Your message dated Mon, 27 Jan 2025 20:49:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1094076: fixed in awesomeversion 24.6.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1094076,
regarding awesomeversion: FTBFS: rm: cannot remove
'/build/reproducible-path/awesomeversion-24.6.0/debian/python3-awesomever
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 1094372 with 1094403
Bug #1094372 [src:py-stringmatching] py-stringmatching: FTBFS with numpy 2.x
1094372 was not blocked by any bugs.
1094372 was blocking: 1082237
Added blocking bug(s) of 1094372: 1094403
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1094026 in restrictedpython reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/restrictedpython/-/commit/c
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1094084 in python-colormap reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/python-colormap/-/commit/ee2
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1094084 [src:python-colormap] python-colormap: FTBFS: RuntimeError: The
Poetry configuration is invalid:
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1094084: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1094084
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.d
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1094057 [src:python-easydev] python-easydev: FTBFS: RuntimeError: The
Poetry configuration is invalid:
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1094057: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1094057
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.deb
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1094057 in python-easydev reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/python-easydev/-/commit/3080e
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1094076 [src:awesomeversion] awesomeversion: FTBFS: rm: cannot remove
'/build/reproducible-path/awesomeversion-24.6.0/debian/python3-awesomeversion/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/LICENCE.md':
No such file or directory
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1094076 in awesomeversion reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/awesomeversion/-/commit/b5e61
Control: tags -1 upreproducible moreinfo
Hi Lucas,
On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 9:37 PM Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> on amd64.
There were some issues with python3-pil and etc, fixed meanwhile. I
can't reproduce this issue at least. C
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 upreproducible moreinfo
Unknown tag/s: upreproducible.
Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible help security upstream
pending confirmed ipv6 lfs d-i l10n newcomer a11y ftbfs fixed-upstream fixed
fixed-in-experimental sid experimental potato wo
Processing control commands:
> block -1 by 1094361
Bug #1094400 [libltdl-dev] libltdl-dev: uninstallable in unstable: Depends:
automake-1.16 but it is not installable
1094400 was not blocked by any bugs.
1094400 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 1094400: 1094361
--
1094400: ht
Package: libltdl-dev
Version: 2.5.4-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-rele...@lists.debian.org
Control: block -1 by 1094361
Steps to reproduce:
$ podman run --rm -it debian:sid-slim
# apt update
# apt install libltdl-dev
(or use your favourite contain
Hi Étienne,
On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 07:57:59PM +0100, Étienne Mollier wrote:
> Hi Salvatore,
>
> Salvatore Bonaccorso, on 2025-01-26:
> > On Sat, Jan 18, 2025 at 04:28:55PM +0100, Étienne Mollier wrote:
> > > Thanks for the reports, patches apply without much fuzz to dcmtk
> > > versions provided
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 23:46:51 +, David Miguel Susano Pinto wrote:
> 2. A Debian packaging bug?
>
>After installing all these Debian packages, the default XML parser
>ends up being XML::SAX::PurePerl. It shouldn't. The default
>behaviour of XML::SAX is to use the latest installed.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 1060747 grave
Bug #1060747 [src:rear] rear: CVE-2024-23301
Severity set to 'grave' from 'important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1060747: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?b
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 1043432 grave
Bug #1043432 [src:ruby-protocol-http1] ruby-protocol-http1: CVE-2023-38697
Severity set to 'grave' from 'important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1043432: https://bugs.debi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 988733 grave
Bug #988733 [ruby-twitter-stream] CVE-2020-24392
Severity set to 'grave' from 'important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
988733: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 1091300
Bug #1091300 [src:firefox-esr] firefox-esr: FTBFS on armhf: warning:
swgl@0.1.0: fatal error: error in backend: Do not know how to scalarize the
result of this operator!
Marked Bug as done
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # make it RC as fixed in stable and otherwise a regression
> severity 1081908 serious
Bug #1081908 [src:openjpeg2] openjpeg2: CVE-2023-39327
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
> found 1081908 2.5.0-2
Bug #1081908 [src:openjpeg2] openjpeg2: CV
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # make it RC as fixed in stable otherwise regression
> severity 989775 serious
Bug #989775 [src:openjpeg2] openjpeg2: CVE-2021-3575
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assist
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 1082382 grave
Bug #1082382 [src:ruby-devise-two-factor] ruby-devise-two-factor: CVE-2024-8796
Severity set to 'grave' from 'important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1082382: https://bugs
pandas needs to skip some tests *anyway* if you want it built now
(because of #1088988), so it probably makes most sense for me to just do
a sourceful upload of pandas that temporarily drops the dependency and
skips/ignores whatever tests would otherwise fail. (This isn't a _fix_,
but it shoul
On Mon, 2025-01-20 at 21:00 +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Although shouldn't the FTBFS bug really on 'sigstore-go' rather than
> 'golang-github-google-certificate-transparency'? The former is what is
> failing to build, not the latter. It would have been nice if the
> g-g-g-c-t test suite trigg
Hi Salvatore,
Salvatore Bonaccorso, on 2025-01-26:
> On Sat, Jan 18, 2025 at 04:28:55PM +0100, Étienne Mollier wrote:
> > Thanks for the reports, patches apply without much fuzz to dcmtk
> > versions provided in sid, stable and oldstable. I would assume
> > they are all affected by CVE-2024-47796
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 grave
Bug #1036873 [gv] Don't Depend on transitional package ghostscript-x
Severity set to 'grave' from 'normal'
--
1036873: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1036873
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Your message dated Mon, 27 Jan 2025 18:32:17 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1053251: fixed in linuxcnc
2.9.0~pre1+git20230208.f1270d6ed7-1+deb12u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1053251,
regarding linuxcnc-uspace: Uncommanded axis movement in MDI mode with some UIs
to be marked as
Your message dated Mon, 27 Jan 2025 18:21:03 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1094375: fixed in scikit-fmm 2024.09.16-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1094375,
regarding scikit-fmm: FTBFS with numpy 2.x
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w
On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 06:20:27PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> pandas build-depends on:
> - python3-matplotlib:amd64 (>= 3.6.3~)
> python3-matplotlib depends on missing:
> - python3-numpy-abi9:amd64
>
> matplotlib build-depends on:
> - python3-pandas:amd64
> python3-pandas depends on:
>
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 1086555 moarvm/2024.09+dfsg-2
Bug #1086555 {Done: Timo Paulssen } [moarvm] on ARM,
spesh arg guard interpreter can enter an infinite loop
Marked as found in versions moarvm/2024.09+dfsg-2.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notfound 1087060 raku-license-spdx/3.18.0-2
Bug #1087060 {Done: Dominique Dumont }
[raku-license-spdx,raku-test-meta] raku-license-spdx and raku-test-meta have an
undeclared file conflict on
/usr/lib/perl6/vendor/precomp/B202134926643267DBA87C6
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1094385 + help
Bug #1094385 [src:matplotlib,src:pandas] matplotlib, pandas: build-depend
cycle, unable to bootstrap
Added tag(s) help.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1094385: https://bugs.de
On 2025-01-27 Bas Couwenberg wrote:
> Source: libvigraimpex
> Version: 1.12.1+dfsg-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: upstream ftbfs
> Justification: makes the package in question unusable or mostly so
> Control: block 1082237 by -1
> Dear Maintainer,
> Your package FTBFS during the numpy2 transition
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package src:libbio-eutilities-perl
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> # https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/
> #
> user debian-bts-l...@lists
Your message dated Mon, 27 Jan 2025 17:21:23 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1091590: fixed in keepass2 2.57+dfsg-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1091590,
regarding keepass2: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:60: override_dh_clideps]
Error 255
to be marked as done.
This means that
On 1/27/25 16:38, Xan Charbonnet wrote:
The MariaDB developers are wondering whether another corruption bug, MDEV-35334
( https://jira.mariadb.org/browse/MDEV-35334 ) might be related.
The symptom was described as:
the first 1 byte of a .ibd file is changed from 0 to 1, or the first 4 bytes
ar
Source: matplotlib,pandas
Severity: serious
Hi,
matplotlib build-deps on pandas, and pandas build-deps on matplotlib.
Due to the current numpy2 transition, they are both in bd-uninstallable
and unable to bootstrap. Can one of the two packages break the cycle?
pandas build-depends on:
- python3-m
Your message dated Mon, 27 Jan 2025 17:05:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1094380: fixed in displaycal-py3 3.9.14-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1094380,
regarding displaycal: Displaycal does not start (3.9.14-1+b1, Jan 27, 2025)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
On 27 janv. 2025 08:18, Charlie Hagedorn wrote:
> Package: displaycal
> Version: 3.9.14-1+b1
> Severity: important
> X-Debbugs-Cc: char...@hagedorn.xyz
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
>* What led up to the situation?
>
> Ran apt-update, saw that displaycal was in the list, got excited. Very
> excitin
On 1/26/25 22:48, Xan Charbonnet wrote:
Since applying the final patch on Friday, I have seen no problems with either
the backup snapshot or catching up with replication. It sure seems like things
are all fixed. I haven't yet tried it on our production Galera cluster, but I
expect to on Mond
The MariaDB developers are wondering whether another corruption bug,
MDEV-35334 ( https://jira.mariadb.org/browse/MDEV-35334 ) might be related.
The symptom was described as:
the first 1 byte of a .ibd file is changed from 0 to 1, or the first 4
bytes are changed from 0 0 0 0 to 1 0 0 0.
Is i
control: tags -1 patch
Dear colleagues,
I can not make a proper team upload as src:cwiid is not in the multimedia-team
space in salsa
so please handle it for me. Git-formatted patch series is attached.
It would be great to check how the new build works against actual Wii
controller as well.
I
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 patch
Bug #1092088 [src:cwiid] cwiid ftbfs with Python 3.13 as the default
Added tag(s) patch.
--
1092088: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1092088
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 1094380 src:wxpython4.0
Bug #1094380 [displaycal] displaycal: Displaycal does not start (3.9.14-1+b1,
Jan 27, 2025)
Bug reassigned from package 'displaycal' to 'src:wxpython4.0'.
No longer marked as found in versions displaycal-py3/3.9.1
reassign 1094380 src:wxpython4.0
found 1094380 wxpython4.0/4.2.2+dfsg-1
affects 1094380 displaycal
forwarded 1094380 https://github.com/wxWidgets/Phoenix/pull/2680
thanks
This needs to be fixed in wxpython. Marking as forwarded to the
upstream PR fixing this issue.
Chris
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 1094380 grave
Bug #1094380 [displaycal] displaycal: Displaycal does not start (3.9.14-1+b1,
Jan 27, 2025)
Severity set to 'grave' from 'important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1094380:
Processing control commands:
> block 1082237 by -1
Bug #1082237 [release.debian.org] transition: numpy 2
1082237 was blocked by: 1094332 1094369 1094370 1094371 1094372 1094373
1082237 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 1082237: 1094374
--
1082237: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bi
Source: scikit-fmm
Version: 2024.05.29-1
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream ftbfs
Justification: makes the package in question unusable or mostly so
Control: block 1082237 by -1
Dear Maintainer,
Your package FTBFS during the numpy2 transition:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=sciki
Your message dated Mon, 27 Jan 2025 15:59:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1093810: fixed in notepadqq 2.0.0~beta1-4.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1093810,
regarding notepadqq: Unnecessary Build-Depends: libqt5webkit5-dev
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> fixed 1094370 bottleneck/1.4.2+ds1-2
Bug #1094370 {Done: Alexandre Detiste }
[src:bottleneck] bottleneck: FTBFS with numpy 2.x
The source bottleneck and version 1.4.2+ds1-2 do not appear to match any binary
packages
Marked as fixed in versions b
Source: xraylib
Version: 4.0.0+dfsg1-6
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream ftbfs
Justification: makes the package in question unusable or mostly so
Control: block 1082237 by -1
Dear Maintainer,
Your package FTBFS during the numpy2 transition:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=xraylib
close 1094370 1.4.2+ds1-2
thanks
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 1094370 1.4.2+ds1-2
Bug #1094370 [src:bottleneck] bottleneck: FTBFS with numpy 2.x
The source 'bottleneck' and version '1.4.2+ds1-2' do not appear to match any
binary packages
Marked as fixed in versions bottleneck/1.4.2+ds1-2.
Bug #1094370
Source: scikit-misc
Version: 0.3.1+dfsg-3
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream ftbfs
Justification: makes the package in question unusable or mostly so
Control: block 1082237 by -1
Dear Maintainer,
Your FTBFS during the numpy2 transition:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=scikit-misc&
Source: bottleneck
Version: 1.4.2+ds1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream ftbfs
Justification: makes the package in question unusable or mostly so
Control: block 1082237 by -1
Dear Maintainer,
Your package FTBFS during the numpy2 transition:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=bottle
Processing control commands:
> block 1082237 by -1
Bug #1082237 [release.debian.org] transition: numpy 2
1082237 was blocked by: 1094332 1094369 1094370 1094371 1094372 1094373 1094374
1094375
1082237 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 1082237: 1094376
--
1082237: https://bugs.
Processing control commands:
> block 1082237 by -1
Bug #1082237 [release.debian.org] transition: numpy 2
1082237 was blocked by: 1094332 1094369 1094370 1094371 1094372 1094373 1094374
1094375 1094376
1082237 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 1082237: 1094377
--
1082237: https
Source: pyopencl
Version: 2024.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream ftbfs
Justification: makes the package in question unusable or mostly so
Control: block 1082237 by -1
Dear Maintainer,
Your package FTBFS during the numpy2 transition:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=pyopencl&ar
Processing control commands:
> block 1082237 by -1
Bug #1082237 [release.debian.org] transition: numpy 2
1082237 was blocked by: 1094332 1094369 1094370 1094371 1094372 1094373 1094374
1082237 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 1082237: 1094375
--
1082237: https://bugs.debian.or
Processing control commands:
> block 1082237 by -1
Bug #1082237 [release.debian.org] transition: numpy 2
1082237 was blocked by: 1094332 1094369 1094370 1094371 1094372
1082237 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 1082237: 1094373
--
1082237: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrep
Source: pyferret
Version: 7.6.5-8
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream ftbfs
Justification: makes the package in question unusable or mostly so
Control: block 1082237 by -1
Dear Maintainer,
Your package FTBFS during the numpy2 transition:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=pyferret&arc
Source: libvigraimpex
Version: 1.12.1+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream ftbfs
Justification: makes the package in question unusable or mostly so
Control: block 1082237 by -1
Dear Maintainer,
Your package FTBFS during the numpy2 transition:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=l
Processing control commands:
> block 1082237 by -1
Bug #1082237 [release.debian.org] transition: numpy 2
1082237 was blocked by: 1094332 1094369 1094370 1094371
1082237 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 1082237: 1094372
--
1082237: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?
Source: py-stringmatching
Version: 0.4.6-1
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream ftbfs
Justification: makes the package in question unusable or mostly so
Control: block 1082237 by -1
Dear Maintainer,
Your package FTBFS during the numpy2 transition:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=py-
Processing control commands:
> block 1082237 by -1
Bug #1082237 [release.debian.org] transition: numpy 2
1082237 was blocked by: 1094332 1094369 1094370
1082237 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 1082237: 1094371
--
1082237: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1082
Processing control commands:
> block 1082237 by -1
Bug #1082237 [release.debian.org] transition: numpy 2
1082237 was blocked by: 1094332 1094369
1082237 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 1082237: 1094370
--
1082237: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1082237
1094
Processing control commands:
> block 1082237 by -1
Bug #1082237 [release.debian.org] transition: numpy 2
1082237 was blocked by: 1094332
1082237 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 1082237: 1094369
--
1082237: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1082237
1094369: htt
Source: aubio
Version: 0.4.9-4.5
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream ftbfs
Justification: makes the package in question unusable or mostly so
Control: block 1082237 by -1
Dear Maintainer,
Your package FTBFS during the numpy2 transition:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=aubio&arch=am
Your message dated Mon, 27 Jan 2025 15:21:11 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1094351: fixed in ucto 0.35-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1094351,
regarding ucto: Missing build dependency on autoconf-archive
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been d
On Mon, 27 Jan 2025 15:05:39 +0100 Pirate Praveen
wrote:
This is actually a bug in sass-spec and fixed by the following patch
--- a/lib/sass_spec/test.rb
+++ b/lib/sass_spec/test.rb
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
end
class SassSpecRunner
- include MiniTest::Assertions
+ include Minitest::Assertions
1 - 100 of 155 matches
Mail list logo
