Your message dated Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:49:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1092683: fixed in lomiri-thumbnailer 3.0.4-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1092683,
regarding lomiri-thumbnailer: FTBFS with taglib 2.0
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Control: tags -1 + patch
On 13/01/2025 12:59, Stuart Prescott wrote:
The error «(SEVERE/4) Unexpected section title.» is about the Parameters
and Returns headings that are inserted into the API docs (running sphinx
with `-v -v -v` revealed that).
There is on-the-fly manipulation of the docstr
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + patch
Bug #1092533 [src:jupyter-client] jupyter-client: FTBFS: make[2]: ***
[Makefile:55: html] Error 2
Added tag(s) patch.
--
1092533: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1092533
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org wit
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1092683 [src:lomiri-thumbnailer] lomiri-thumbnailer: FTBFS with taglib 2.0
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1092683: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1092683
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1092683 in lomiri-thumbnailer reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/ubports-team/lomiri-thumbnailer/-/commit/a97b9
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 src:linux
Bug #1092889 [linux-image-6.1.0-29-arm64] linux-image-6.1.0-29-arm64: oops in
nft_rhash_gc
Bug reassigned from package 'linux-image-6.1.0-29-arm64' to 'src:linux'.
No longer marked as found in versions linux-signed-arm64/6.1.123+1.
Ignoring req
On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 16:55:17 +0100 =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=F6rg_Frings-F=FCrst?=
wrote:
> severity 1064855 grave
> thanks
>
>
> Another problem is that the login credentials are required every time
> the monitors go dark.
>
> Although locking is switched off.
>
> I therefore set the severity to Grave
Your message dated Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:19:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1092773: fixed in php-netscape-bookmark-parser 4.0.0-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1092773,
regarding php-netscape-bookmark-parser: Depends on php-psr-log (<< 2~~)
to be marked as done.
This means that y
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> limit source php-netscape-bookmark-parser
Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing at least one of
'php-netscape-bookmark-parser'
Limit currently set to 'source':'php-netscape-bookmark-parser'
> tags 1092773 + pending
Bug #1092773 [src:ph
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> limit source php-netscape-bookmark-parser
Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing at least one of
'php-netscape-bookmark-parser'
Limit currently set to 'source':'php-netscape-bookmark-parser'
> tags 1092773 + pending
Bug #1092773 [src:ph
Your message dated Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:15:02 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1092206: fixed in libreoffice 4:25.2.0~rc2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1092206,
regarding libreoffice still b-d's on GCC 12 on i386, which should not be part
of the trixie release
to be marked as done.
Hi Maytham!
I don't see any updates at
https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-golang-x-net/-/commits/debian/sid
since I posted my feedback, so I assume I should continue waiting?
On Sun, 5 Jan 2025 at 11:51, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> Hi!
>
> (I am cc'ing Anthony so he is aware that th
Your message dated Mon, 13 Jan 2025 03:06:01 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1092681: fixed in deepin-music 6.2.40-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1092681,
regarding deepin-music: FTBFS with taglib 2.0
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
The error «(SEVERE/4) Unexpected section title.» is about the Parameters
and Returns headings that are inserted into the API docs (running sphinx
with `-v -v -v` revealed that).
There is on-the-fly manipulation of the docstrings in
jupyter_client/client.py::reqrep - I was able to get the docs
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1074913 + patch
Bug #1074913 {Done: Debian FTP Masters }
[src:directfb] directfb: ftbfs with GCC-14
Added tag(s) patch.
> found 1092330 3.0.1+ds-1
Bug #1092330 [libmimalloc2.0] libmimalloc2.0: fails to provide
libmimalloc.so.2.0
Ignoring re
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 1092063
Bug #1092063 [src:kdevelop-python] kdevelop-python ftbfs with Python 3.13 as
the default
Marked Bug as done
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1092063: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/b
On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 12:32:53 + junk mail
wrote:
I am on the testing release, and use KDE. linux: 6.12.6-1; nvidia-driver
535.216.03. The problem I was experiencing is that I couldn't change the
display resolution nor refresh rate. These issues occurred after updating the
Linux kernel, eve
Your message dated Mon, 13 Jan 2025 00:06:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1091403: fixed in brian 2.8.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1091403,
regarding brian ftbfs with Python 3.13 as the default
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Mon, 13 Jan 2025 00:06:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1091403: fixed in brian 2.8.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1091403,
regarding brian FTBFS with Python 3.13 as default
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
Your message dated Mon, 13 Jan 2025 00:06:17 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1092748: fixed in dnarrange 1.5.3-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1092748,
regarding Autopkgtests fail with Python 3.13: DeprecationWarning: 'maxsplit' is
passed as positional argument
to be marked as do
Your message dated Mon, 13 Jan 2025 00:50:28 +0100
with message-id <173672582895.1248275.9138918350727703...@cairon.jones.dk>
and subject line Re: Bug#1092428: tailspin: FTBFS: build-dependency not
installable: librust-terminal-size-0.3+default-dev
has caused the Debian Bug report #1092428,
regard
Your message dated Sun, 12 Jan 2025 23:49:25 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1091399: fixed in beanprice 1.2.1+git20240619-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1091399,
regarding python3-beanprice has an undeclared file conflict on
/usr/bin/bean-price
to be marked as done.
This means t
Your message dated Sun, 12 Jan 2025 23:49:17 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1091311: fixed in ario 1.6-1.3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1091311,
regarding ario: FTBFS on armhf: preferences/ario-server-preferences.c:192:51:
error: passing argument 1 of 'ctime' from incompatible po
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1092748 in dnarrange reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/dnarrange/-/commit/fb3eb92c8eab0be0e4a1d4a61ff
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1092748 [src:dnarrange] Autopkgtests fail with Python 3.13:
DeprecationWarning: 'maxsplit' is passed as positional argument
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1092748: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1092748
Debian Bug Tracking System
C
On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 08:34:02PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > FAIL: test_invalid_json
> > (tests.test_ionit.TestCollectContext.test_invalid_json)
> > Test: Run collect_context(["tests/config/invalid-json"])
> > --
> > Traceb
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1092519 + patch
Bug #1092519 [src:ionit] ionit: FTBFS: AssertionError: Regex didn't match:
"ERROR:ionit:Failed to read JSON from '[^']*config/invalid-json/invalid.json':
Expecting property name enclosed in double quotes: line 3 column 1 \\(
On 12/01/2025, Simon McVittie wrote:
Normally we keep the patch's upstream authorship when applying patches,
So do I when using DEP-3 (Author:) tags, which is my more usual format.
(because it looked like you've taken the patch directly from upstream
rather than writing any code yourself).
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1090225 + fixed-upstream
Bug #1090225 [src:freezegun] freezegun: FTBFS: E AssertionError: FakeDate(2013,
4, 9) != datetime.datetime(2013, 4, 9, 0, 0)
Added tag(s) fixed-upstream.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you n
Control: tag -1 patch
On Sat, Jan 11, 2025 at 02:17:47PM +0500, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
> https://ci.debian.net/packages/d/dnarrange/testing/amd64/56310221/
>
> I assume "/usr/bin/dnarrange:561: DeprecationWarning: 'maxsplit' is passed as
> positional argument" is what causes the failure.
I'v
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 patch
Bug #1092748 [src:dnarrange] Autopkgtests fail with Python 3.13:
DeprecationWarning: 'maxsplit' is passed as positional argument
Added tag(s) patch.
--
1092748: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1092748
Debian Bug Tracking System
Conta
Your message dated Sun, 12 Jan 2025 23:19:14 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1064555: fixed in faketime 0.9.10-2.4~exp0.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1064555,
regarding faketime: FTBFS on 32 bit architectures: Test Suites summary: 3
succeeded, 1 failed
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Sun, 12 Jan 2025 23:19:14 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1079346: fixed in faketime 0.9.10-2.4~exp0.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1079346,
regarding src:faketime: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on 32
bit archs
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Sun, 12 Jan 2025 23:19:14 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1032177: fixed in faketime 0.9.10-2.4~exp0.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1032177,
regarding faketime doesn't fake time (on i386)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Sun, 12 Jan 2025 23:19:14 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1032177: fixed in faketime 0.9.10-2.4~exp0.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1032177,
regarding osslsigncode: FTBFS on arm{el,hf}: test failures
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
Ian Jackson:
Niels Thykier writes ("Bug#1086944: sauce: diff for NMU version 0.9.2+nmu1"):
Since the bug has now become RC, I am rescheduling it to 5 days (down
from its original delay).
Thanks for taking care of this.
You are welcome. :)
This package needs some love - I have a branch of
On Sun, Jan 12, 2025 at 08:20:22PM +0100, tho...@goirand.fr wrote:
> On Jan 11, 2025 10:09, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> > [..] In trixie and
> > later, sysusers implementations are no longer coinstallable but mutually
> > exclusive. This simplifies the story a lot. I propose mirroring the
> > confli
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1092206 [src:libreoffice] libreoffice still b-d's on GCC 12 on i386, which
should not be part of the trixie release
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1092206 to the same tags previously set
--
1092206: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugre
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1092206 in libreoffice reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/libreoffice-team/libreoffice/libreoffice/-/commit/14c
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + patch
Bug #1092683 [src:lomiri-thumbnailer] lomiri-thumbnailer: FTBFS with taglib 2.0
Added tag(s) patch.
--
1092683: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1092683
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 + patch
X-Debbugs-CC: sunwea...@debian.org mariog...@debian.org
Hi,
On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 12:07:39 -0500 Boyuan Yang wrote:
Source: lomiri-thumbnailer
Version: 3.0.3-1
Severity: important
User: debian-multime...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: taglib2.0
The package fails to build wi
Control: tags -1 patch pending
Hi. Thanks, Helge, for those patches. With this message I'm tagging
this bug "patch" to say there's a patch available. I'm doing some
local testing, but so far, your patches seem to make the package pass
its own build-time tests, at leaste.
To the maintainer:
I
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 patch pending
Bug #1064555 [src:faketime] faketime: FTBFS on 32 bit architectures: Test
Suites summary: 3 succeeded, 1 failed
Added tag(s) patch and pending.
--
1064555: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1064555
Debian Bug Tracking System
C
On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 at 12:28:10 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> I have a USB optical drive and some media, so I can at least do a
> smoke-test on it to get this RC bug fixed, assuming my blank media
> haven't completely delaminated by now.
In fact it doesn't work: with the patch Rebecca found, it c
Your message dated Sun, 12 Jan 2025 22:17:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1092772: fixed in linux 6.1.124-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1092772,
regarding linux-image-6.1.0-29-arm64: kernel OOPS when using nftables
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
Your message dated Sun, 12 Jan 2025 22:17:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1092772: fixed in linux 6.1.124-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1092772,
regarding linux-image-6.1.0-29-arm64: Oops: Unable to handle kernel paging
request at virtual address e1fb238c
to be marked
Control: tag -1 patch
On Sat, Jan 11, 2025 at 10:38:55PM +0500, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
> https://ci.debian.net/packages/w/wireless-regdb/testing/amd64/56320878/
>
> autopkgtest [09:10:13]: test check-signatures: [---
> Exception ignored in: <_io.BufferedReader name=3>
> Tr
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 patch
Bug #1092796 [wireless-regdb] Autopkgtests fail with Python 3.13: OSError:
[Errno 9] Bad file descriptor
Added tag(s) patch.
--
1092796: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1092796
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
Package: libglx-mesa0
Version: 24.3.0~rc1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: makes other packages FTBFS
Forwarded: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/issues/12452
Dear Maintainer,
When mesa was updated to 24.3 branch a few days ago, some packages of our
Qt/KDE team started to FTBFS on ppc
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1092206 in libreoffice reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/libreoffice-team/libreoffice/libreoffice/-/commit/14c
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1092206 [src:libreoffice] libreoffice still b-d's on GCC 12 on i386, which
should not be part of the trixie release
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1092206: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1092206
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact o
Your message dated Sun, 12 Jan 2025 21:38:27 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1092888: fixed in sioyek 2.0.0+dfsg-5.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1092888,
regarding sioyek: FTBFS
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not t
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/ElvishArtisan/GlassCoder/issues/27
Control: tags -1 + patch
On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 12:38:46 -0500 Boyuan Yang wrote:
Source: glasscoder
Version: 2.0.1-2
Severity: important
User: debian-multime...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: taglib2.0
The package fails to b
Processing control commands:
> forwarded -1 https://github.com/ElvishArtisan/GlassCoder/issues/27
Bug #1092687 [src:glasscoder] glasscoder: FTBFS with taglib 2.0
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://github.com/ElvishArtisan/GlassCoder/issues/27'.
> tags -1 + patch
Bug #1092687 [src:glasscoder
Your message dated Sun, 12 Jan 2025 21:22:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1092417: fixed in userv 1.2.1~beta5
has caused the Debian Bug report #1092417,
regarding userv: FTBFS: make[2]: *** [Makefile:80: install] Error 1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
Please find a debdiff attached.
I am uploading it as NMU.diff -Nru sioyek-2.0.0+dfsg/debian/changelog sioyek-2.0.0+dfsg/debian/changelog
--- sioyek-2.0.0+dfsg/debian/changelog 2024-05-24 17:51:04.0 +
+++ sioyek-2.0.0+dfsg/debian/changelog 2025-01-12 21:03:41.0 +
@@ -1,3 +
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notfound 1092707 mixxx/2.5.0+dfsg-2
Bug #1092707 [src:mixxx] mixxx: FTBFS with taglib 2.0: test failed
No longer marked as found in versions mixxx/2.5.0+dfsg-2.
> close 1092707
Bug #1092707 [src:mixxx] mixxx: FTBFS with taglib 2.0: test failed
Mar
notfound 1092707 mixxx/2.5.0+dfsg-2
close 1092707
thanks
It looks like the taglib 2.0.2 rebuild of mixxx actually passed.
This bug report is no longer valid. Closing accordingly.
Thanks,
Boyuan Yang
On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 13:51:22 -0500 Boyuan Yang wrote:
Source: mixxx
Version: 2.5.0+dfsg-2
Seve
Ben Harris writes ("Bug#1092417: userv: FTBFS: make[2]: *** [Makefile:80:
install] Error 1"):
> I think using "binary-targets" is pretty much inevitable given that
> /usr/bin/userv is setuid.
Thanks for the verification. I am going to do as you suggest.
Howeever, it may be possible to get this
Your message dated Sun, 12 Jan 2025 20:47:06 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1090285: fixed in python-pyfakefs 5.7.3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1090285,
regarding python-pyfakefs: FTBFS: INTERNALERROR> ValueError: '/<>'
is not in the subpath of '/<>'
to be marked as done.
Thi
Your message dated Sun, 12 Jan 2025 20:48:55 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1092434: fixed in xscavenger 1.4.5-9
has caused the Debian Bug report #1092434,
regarding xscavenger: FTBFS: make: *** [debian/rules:99: stamp-binary] Error 1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim th
Your message dated Sun, 12 Jan 2025 20:48:24 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1091569: fixed in receptor 1.5.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1091569,
regarding receptor: FTBFS on i386: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test
--test-pytest -i python{version} -p "3.13 3.12" --name=recep
Package: kineticstools
Version: 0.6.1+git20220223.1326a4d+dfsg-3
Followup-For: Bug #1092749
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu plucky ubuntu-patch
Control: tags -1 patch
Dear Maintainer,
Would it be possible to consider removing the cram autopkgtest?
cram only runs versi
Your message dated Sun, 12 Jan 2025 20:48:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1075485: fixed in sa-exim 4.2.1-21
has caused the Debian Bug report #1075485,
regarding sa-exim: ftbfs with GCC-14
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Source: sioyek
Version: 2.0.0+dfsg-4
Severity: serious
The package does not build with current mupdf.
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 patch
Bug #1092749 [src:kineticstools] Autopkgtests fail with Python 3.13: ipdSummary
output changed
Added tag(s) patch.
--
1092749: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1092749
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with pro
Your message dated Sun, 12 Jan 2025 20:41:39 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1089303: fixed in chiark-utils 8.0.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #1089303,
regarding chiark-utils: Supporting rootless builds by default
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1092881 + pending
Bug #1092881 [libtevent0t64] libtevent0t64: breaks itself
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1092881: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=109
On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 21:29:27 +0300 Michael Tokarev wrote:
What do you mean by "vise-versa"?
I mean that AFAIU it seems that the amd64 package breaks the i386 one,
and the i386 package breaks the amd64 one.
There's no libtevent0 package anymore, so it can't break anything.
libtevent0t64 p
Control: tag -1 = confirmed
12.01.2025 22:43, Michael Kümmling wrote:
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of libtevent0t64:amd64:
libtevent0t64:i386 (2:0.16.1+samba4.21.3+dfsg-5) breaks libtevent0 (<<
2:4.21.3+dfsg-5) and is unpacked but not configured.
Aha. It is the version
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 = confirmed
Bug #1092881 [libtevent0t64] libtevent0t64: breaks itself
Added tag(s) confirmed; removed tag(s) moreinfo and unreproducible.
--
1092881: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1092881
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debi
Ian Jackson:
tl;dr:
TYVM. This is all great.
I'll be uploading *with* your dh changes, fixed, shortly.
Niels Thykier writes ("Bug#1089303: chiark-utils: Supporting rootless builds by
default"):
The final patch `dh-prototype.diff` is what I envisioned would be the
final bit required to m
On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 21:29:27 +0300 Michael Tokarev wrote:
There's no libtevent0 package anymore, so it can't break anything.
> I had to downgrade to previous version (4.21.3+dfsg-4 and
2.10.0+samba4.21.3+dfsg-4) of all those packages to repair the system.
What's the error message you're getti
On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 at 20:36:25 +0100, Bastian Germann wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Dec 2024 10:38:16 + Simon McVittie wrote:
> > We should remove this unmaintained upstream code from Debian, but at the
> > moment we cannot, because budgie-control-center (#1059485) and budgie-core
> > in unstable (#10594
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 serious
Bug #1030130 [src:gnome-bluetooth] libgnome-bluetooth13: superseded version of
gnome-bluetooth3, should be removed eventually
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
--
1030130: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1030130
Debia
Hello,
On Fri 10 Jan 2025 at 02:34pm -08, Xiyue Deng wrote:
> Thanks for bringing up this. I checked the uscan manual and it said
> that the default for "gitmode" is "shallow", so AIUI it shouldn't be
> that costly, right?
That didn't exist before, so yeah, not so bad. Still more than HTTP.
-
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1090285 in python-pyfakefs reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/python-pyfakefs/-/commit/1f9
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1090285 [src:python-pyfakefs] python-pyfakefs: FTBFS: INTERNALERROR>
ValueError: '/<>' is not in the subpath of '/<>'
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1090285: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1090285
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
On Jan 11, 2025 10:09, Helmut Grohne wrote:
>
> Source: opensysusers
> Version: 0.7.3-4
> Severity: serious
> Justification: loss of systemd files
> Tags: patch
> User: helm...@debian.org
> Usertags: dep17
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm sorry to tell you that I got the DEP17 mitigation for
Your message dated Sun, 12 Jan 2025 20:26:34 +0100
with message-id <77bac863-b27b-489a-849e-72b7acc22...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: r-bioc-qtlizer: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable:
r-api-bioc-3.20
has caused the Debian Bug report #1091069,
regarding r-bioc-qtlizer: FTBFS: build-depen
I tested the build with python 3.13 without problems.
--
Eric Valette
tl;dr:
TYVM. This is all great.
I'll be uploading *with* your dh changes, fixed, shortly.
Niels Thykier writes ("Bug#1089303: chiark-utils: Supporting rootless builds by
default"):
> The final patch `dh-prototype.diff` is what I envisioned would be the
> final bit required to move to `dh`.
Your message dated Sun, 12 Jan 2025 18:52:03 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1091873: fixed in octave-statistics 1.7.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1091873,
regarding octave-statistics: flaky autopkgtest: seems to hang and times out
to be marked as done.
This means that you clai
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 pending
Bug #1089303 [src:chiark-utils] chiark-utils: Supporting rootless builds by
default
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1089303: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1089303
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 pending
Hi. Thanks for all this. Superb work.
I have reviewed the first three patches and their output and I have
adopted them into my own mainline. I'll be uploading later today.
First, though, I want to see if I can adopt the dh patch, or something
like it.
Regards,
Ian.
Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2025-01-12 19:26:12)
> Quoting Otto Kekäläinen (2025-01-12 19:08:05)
> > I can try importing latest upstream and run reverse builds for all
> > dependants.
>
> Thanks, that sounds quite helpful.
I have now adjusted to build routines for oxigraph to tolerate failures
rela
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1092881 + moreinfo unreproducible
Bug #1092881 [libtevent0t64] libtevent0t64: breaks itself
Added tag(s) unreproducible and moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1092881: https://bugs.debi
Control: tag + moreinfo unreproducible
12.01.2025 21:07, Raphaël Halimi wrote:
Package: libtevent0t64
Version: 2:0.16.1+samba4.21.3+dfsg-5
Severity: critical
Dear fellow maintainers,
libtevent0t64:i386 2:0.16.1+samba4.21.3+dfsg-5 breaks libtevent0:amd64 (<< 2:4.21.3+dfsg-5), and vice-versa, re
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 11, 2025 at 09:46:36PM +0100, Peter Gerber wrote:
> Package: src:linux
> Version: 6.1.123-1
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks the whole system
> X-Debbugs-Cc: pe...@arbitrary.ch
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> Ever since updating to linux-image-6.1.0-29-arm64 I've been seeing
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1091873 in octave-statistics reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-octave-team/octave-statistics/-/commit/380d
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1091873 [src:octave-statistics] octave-statistics: flaky autopkgtest:
seems to hang and times out
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1091873: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1091873
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.o
Quoting Otto Kekäläinen (2025-01-12 19:08:05)
> I can try importing latest upstream and run reverse builds for all
> dependants.
Thanks, that sounds quite helpful.
> One challenge I have at the moment is that upstream is not responding on
> GitHub PRs and ignoring fixes and also not publishing an
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 1092806 serious
Bug #1092806 [src:linux] linux-image-6.1.0-29-arm64: Oops: Unable to handle
kernel paging request at virtual address e1fb238c
Severity set to 'serious' from 'critical'
> forcemerge 1092772 1092806
Bug #1092772 [sr
Your message dated Sun, 12 Jan 2025 18:05:49 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1078879: fixed in python-webob 1:1.8.9-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1078879,
regarding python-webob: CVE-2024-42353
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Package: libtevent0t64
Version: 2:0.16.1+samba4.21.3+dfsg-5
Severity: critical
Dear fellow maintainers,
libtevent0t64:i386 2:0.16.1+samba4.21.3+dfsg-5 breaks libtevent0:amd64
(<< 2:4.21.3+dfsg-5), and vice-versa, resulting in errors during upgrade
for them and dependent packages (samba-libs, l
I can try importing latest upstream and run reverse builds for all
dependants.
One challenge I have at the moment is that upstream is not responding on
GitHub PRs and ignoring fixes and also not publishing any policy of which
RocksDB version is likely good for long-term maintenance. Thus there is
Your message dated Sun, 12 Jan 2025 17:52:24 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1092797: fixed in xonsh 0.19.0+dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1092797,
regarding Autopkgtests fail with Python 3.13
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1078879 [src:python-webob] python-webob: CVE-2024-42353
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1078879: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1078879
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1078879 in python-webob reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/python-webob/-/commit/d8b465218
Processing control commands:
> block 1084894 by -1
Bug #1084894 [release.debian.org] transition: phpunit
1084894 was blocked by: 1039752 1039755 1039781 1039783 1039788 1039792 1039795
1039841 1039856 1070511 1070514 1070517 1070553 1070557 1070567 1070580 1070590
1070600 1070608 1070621 1070639
1 - 100 of 161 matches
Mail list logo
