Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1092065 - upstream fixed-upstream
Bug #1092065 [src:obitools] obitools ftbfs with Python 3.13 as the default
Removed tag(s) upstream and fixed-upstream.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1092065
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notforwarded 1092065
Bug #1092065 [src:obitools] obitools ftbfs with Python 3.13 as the default
Unset Bug forwarded-to-address
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1092065: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-b
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1092081 + ftbfs
Bug #1092081 [src:virtualbox] virtualbox ftbfs with Python 3.13 as the default
Added tag(s) ftbfs.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1092081: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugr
Note to forgetful self: missing AFM font files during Fontforge build.
A quick debuild on my Debian/testing machine works out fine.
>From Lucas' build log:
=
dh_installexamples -platex-cjk-chinese-arphic-bkai00mp
-
Your message dated Fri, 10 Jan 2025 01:19:05 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1092559: fixed in medusa 2.3~rc1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1092559,
regarding medusa: Drop freerdp2 support
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If th
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1092559 [src:medusa] medusa: Drop freerdp2 support
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1092559: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1092559
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1092559 in medusa reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-security-team/medusa/-/commit/efbd12e6ef3adb89addc8f7f
Control: tags -1 + patch
It looks like the Python 3.13 FTBFS in aflplusplus is caused by a failure
to properly handle exceptions when initialising a Python mutator. I don't
have a good understanding of Python's C interface, but it looks like when
PyObject_GetAttrString() is called on a key th
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + patch
Bug #1091402 [src:aflplusplus] aflplusplus FTBFS with Python 3.13 as default
Added tag(s) patch.
--
1091402: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1091402
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Your message dated Thu, 09 Jan 2025 23:04:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1091248: fixed in ax25-tools
0.0.10-rc5+git20230513+d3e6d4f-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1091248,
regarding ax25-tools: FTBFS on armhf: mkiss.c:387:14: error: passing argument 1
of ‘time’ from incompat
Processing control commands:
> block -1 by 1088257
Bug #1089526 [src:rst2pdf] rst2pdf: cannot import name '_fitz_old' from
partially initialized module 'fitz_old'
1089526 was not blocked by any bugs.
1089526 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 1089526: 1088257
--
1089526: https:
Control: block -1 by 1088257
This issue will be gone when python3-fitz 1.25 (now experimental) is uploaded
to unstable.
Your message dated Thu, 09 Jan 2025 22:36:04 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1084303: fixed in music 1.2.1-0.5
has caused the Debian Bug report #1084303,
regarding music: FTBFS: pybuffer.cpp:1709:3: error: 'MPI_Session' does not name
a type
to be marked as done.
This means that you cl
Your message dated Thu, 09 Jan 2025 22:19:11 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1089296: fixed in bridge-utils 1.7.1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1089296,
regarding bridge-utils: Supporting rootless builds by default
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
On Sun, Dec 22, 2024 at 10:13:01AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > === FAILURES
> > ===
> > ___ TestSOCKS4Proxy.test_socks_with_invalid_username
> > ___
[...]
> > > with pytest.raises(NewConnectionE
Your message dated Thu, 9 Jan 2025 21:19:43 +
with message-id <20250109211943.gg19...@mal.justgohome.co.uk>
and subject line Re: Bug#1092376: python-trio: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error:
pybuild --test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p "3.13 3.12" returned exit
code 13
has caused the Debian Bug
tags 1089501 + fixed-upstream
It was pointed out to me in IRC by jaltman that Linux 6.12 support
was newly added in 1.8.13.1, per its release notes.
Your message dated Thu, 09 Jan 2025 22:44:32 +0100
with message-id <9452405.CDJkKcVGEf@treadstone-71>
and subject line
has caused the Debian Bug report #1092154,
regarding src:akregator: unsatisfied build dependency in testing:
libkf5kontactinterface-dev (>= 22.12.3~)
to be marked as done.
This
The Scribus project says the dependency isn't required. Scribus can be
built without the component that needs it (and is usually built that
way): https://bugs.scribus.net/view.php?id=17371 .
Scribus also just released a new version (1.6.3).
Hi
Please do not set -DWANT_SCRIPTER2=ON on the CMake command line and then the
default (and only maintained) Python Scripter plugin will be compiled. We just
released Scribus 1.6.3 and in our packages (I build the Mac OS packages), I
used Python 3.13 as the bundled python.
As such, there is no
Your message dated Thu, 09 Jan 2025 21:04:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1092403: fixed in dsdo 1.6.36-15
has caused the Debian Bug report #1092403,
regarding dsdo: FTBFS: make: *** [debian/cdbs/1/class/dict.mk:96:
install/idanish] Error 1
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Processing control commands:
> block -1 by 1092602
Bug #1092613 [src:pymupdf] pymupdf: Move v1.25.x to unstable
1092613 was not blocked by any bugs.
1092613 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 1092613: 1092602
> block -1 by 1091865
Bug #1092613 [src:pymupdf] pymupdf: Move v1.25.x t
Control: tags -1 + patch
--
On Tue, Jan 07, 2025 at 08:50:53PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: haskell-cmark-gfm
> Version: 0.2.5+ds1-3
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS
> Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
> User: lu...@debian.org
> Usertags: ftbfs-20250106 ftbfs-trixie
>
> Hi,
>
> During a
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + patch
Bug #1092404 [src:haskell-cmark-gfm] haskell-cmark-gfm: FTBFS: make: ***
[/usr/share/cdbs/1/class/hlibrary.mk:163: check-ghc-stamp] Error 25
Added tag(s) patch.
--
1092404: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1092404
Debian Bug Tracki
Your message dated Thu, 09 Jan 2025 20:43:22 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1091136: fixed in libsbml 5.20.4+dfsg-0.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1091136,
regarding libsbml: FTBFS: make: *** [debian/rules:60: binary] Error 255
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Thu, 09 Jan 2025 20:43:22 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1092075: fixed in libsbml 5.20.4+dfsg-0.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1092075,
regarding libsbml ftbfs with Python 3.13 as the default
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Hi Rylie,
thanks a lot for your promising analysis. I wonder whether you (or
someone else) might be able to create a MR. I have neither any personal
interest in this package nor dedicated time any more.
Kind regards
Andreas.
Am Thu, Jan 09, 2025 at 11:53:39AM -0600 schrieb Rylie Pavlik:
> O
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 1092084 nordugrid-arc ftbfs with OpenSSL 3.4.0
Bug #1092084 [src:nordugrid-arc] nordugrid-arc ftbfs with Python 3.13 as the
default
Changed Bug title to 'nordugrid-arc ftbfs with OpenSSL 3.4.0' from
'nordugrid-arc ftbfs with Python 3.13
Craig Small:
On Sat, 4 Jan 2025, 10:27 pm Niels Thykier, wrote:
In the mean time, the transition has moved to the endgame with the bug
now becoming RC (a regular FTBFS in sid). I can offer to do a NMU of
wordpress/6.6.1+dfsg1-1 with a minimal patch to fix the bug (1-line
`Rules-Requires-Root:
Control: tags 1091775 + patch
Control: tags 1091775 + pending
--
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for hyprland (versioned as 0.41.2+ds-1.3) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/10. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
--
Regards
Sudip
diff -Nru hyprland-0.41.2+ds/debian/changel
Processing control commands:
> tags 1091775 + patch
Bug #1091775 [src:hyprland] FTBFS because unsatisfiable build dependency on
libwlroots-dev
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 1091775 + pending
Bug #1091775 [src:hyprland] FTBFS because unsatisfiable build dependency on
libwlroots-dev
Added tag(s) pend
On Wed, 1 Jan 2025 19:27:01 +0100 alberto fuentes wrote:
(i cant
boot into 6.11 either with same sympthoms)
You should be able to access full-screen terminal (not via desktop environment that crashes) and rebuild (reinstall)
using that..?
Your message dated Thu, 9 Jan 2025 20:14:54 +
with message-id <8ae6a62f-f852-4129-ab73-e71bc0f30...@debian.org>
and subject line binNMU scheduled
has caused the Debian Bug report #1092512,
regarding ocaml-multicore-magic: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable:
libcontainers-ocaml-dev-5iq37
t
Your message dated Thu, 09 Jan 2025 20:10:10 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1081712: fixed in pymupdf 1.25.0+ds1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1081712,
regarding pymupdf: FTBFS: error: too few arguments to function ‘handler->open’
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Package: checksecurity
Version: 2.0.17
Severity: serious
Tags: security
X-Debbugs-Cc: ni...@thykier.net,ti...@debian.org
Hi
The 2.0.17 upload cannot migrate to testing, since piuparts reports a
regression for it. The (hopefully) relevant part of the piuparts log is:
0m10.7s ERROR: Command fa
On Sun, Dec 22, 2024 at 3:39 AM Paul Gevers wrote:
> With a recent upload of cmake the autopkgtest of lfortran fails in
> testing when that autopkgtest is run with the binary packages of cmake
> from unstable. It passes when run with only packages from testing.
For reference, CMake 3.31 introduced
On 09.01.25 19:01, Adrian Bunk wrote:
* Revert Maintainer change and Ubuntu changelog entries from the previous
NMU.
yes, sorry, noticed that too late.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> archive 1038834
Bug #1038834 {Done: Hans-Christoph Steiner }
[src:android-platform-libcore] android-platform-libcore: transition from
/etc/timezone to /etc/localtime
archived 1038834 to archive/34 (from 1038834)
> archive 1038836
Bug #1038836 {D
Your message dated Thu, 09 Jan 2025 18:44:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1092493: fixed in wxglade 1:1.1.0+repack-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1092493,
regarding wxglade: Error on startup: Importing widget "notebook.notebook"
failed
to be marked as done.
This means that yo
Your message dated Thu, 09 Jan 2025 18:39:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1089398: fixed in netselect 0.3.ds1-31
has caused the Debian Bug report #1089398,
regarding netselect: Supporting rootless builds by default
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Hi Peter,
thank you for the bug report. I just uploaded to unstable a new release
which fixes this issue, now.
Best regards, Georges.
Peter Roozemaal a écrit :
> Package: wxglade
> Version: 1.1.a2+repack-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
> X-Debbugs-
Your message dated Thu, 09 Jan 2025 18:34:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1074871: fixed in cde 0.1+git9-g551e54d-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1074871,
regarding cde: ftbfs with GCC-14
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If th
Source: dracut
Version: 105-3
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: flaky
Severity: grave
Justification: blocks other packages from migrating
Dear Maintainer(s),
The new upstream-dracut-network-nfs autopkgtest fails on amd64,
blocking other packages from migrating to test when they get sched
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> unarchive 1038834
Bug #1038834 {Done: Hans-Christoph Steiner }
[src:android-platform-libcore] android-platform-libcore: transition from
/etc/timezone to /etc/localtime
Unarchived Bug 1038834
> unarchive 1038836
Bug #1038836 {Done: Georges Khazna
OK, so this is puzzling.
Case 1: globjects from salsa builds fine on bookworm (with bookworm
libglbinding-dev).
Case 2: If I install slightly outdated libglbinding-dev from salsa
(3.3.0-1), I get the error seen on salsa CI, so I suspect salsa was
using the older version for some reason.
Case 3:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 1090266
> https://github.com/python-babel/babel/commit/740ee3d6a4c57ea3543334d6465085dd1d5df010
Bug #1090266 [src:python-babel] python-babel: FTBFS: AssertionError: assert
'8.1.2016' == '8. tammik. 2016'
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
Processing control commands:
> tags 1061216 + patch
Bug #1061216 [src:openvdb] openvdb: Please upgrade to llvm-toolchain-18
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 1061216 + pending
Bug #1061216 [src:openvdb] openvdb: Please upgrade to llvm-toolchain-18
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1061216: https://bugs.debian.o
Hi Markus
* Markus Blatt [250109 16:24]:
> the binary rebuild for version 2024.10+ds-3+b3 on January 7 failed on all
> architectures, see [1]
> and particularly [2] for amd64. The rebuilds were probably done for the
> python3.13 as default
> transition [3].
Looking at the transition tracker [1
Control: tags 1061216 + patch
Control: tags 1061216 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for openvdb (versioned as 10.0.1-2.3) and uploaded
it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I should cancel it.
* Disable AX until ported to newer LLVM. (Closes: #1061216)
* Revert Mai
Your message dated Thu, 9 Jan 2025 18:54:33 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: cross-toolchain-base-mipsen: Supporting rootless builds by
default
has caused the Debian Bug report #1089877,
regarding cross-toolchain-base-mipsen: Supporting rootless builds by default
to be marked as done.
I think this is due to the openturns FTBFS (see #1091444).
Processing control commands:
> notfound -1 alsa-ucm-conf/1.2.12-1
Bug #1092257 [alsa-ucm-conf] alsa-ucm-conf: internal microphone unavailable
after upgrading to 1.2.13-1
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #1092257 to the same values
previously set
--
1092257: https://bugs.debian.o
Processing control commands:
> notfound -1 alsa-ucm-conf/1.2.12-1
Bug #1092257 [alsa-ucm-conf] alsa-ucm-conf: internal microphone unavailable
after upgrading to 1.2.13-1
No longer marked as found in versions alsa-ucm-conf/1.2.12-1.
--
1092257: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1
Control: notfound -1 alsa-ucm-conf/1.2.12-1
Thanks for reporting, fixing metadata since this only affects 1.2.13
Control: tags -1 +pending
On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 11:23:17AM +0100, Agustin Martin wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 07, 2025 at 08:50:13PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Source: dsdo
> > Version: 1.6.36-14
> > Severity: serious
> > Justification: FTBFS
> > Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
> > User: lu...@debian.org
>
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 +pending
Bug #1092403 [src:dsdo] dsdo: FTBFS: make: *** [debian/cdbs/1/class/dict.mk:96:
install/idanish] Error 1
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1092403: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1092403
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debi
Your message dated Thu, 09 Jan 2025 16:40:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1091426: fixed in opm-simulators 2024.10+ds-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1091426,
regarding opm-simulators FTBFS with Python 3.13 as default
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the prob
Your message dated Thu, 9 Jan 2025 16:38:41 +
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1091004: python-ring-doorbell: autopkgtest needs
update for new version of python-pytest-asyncio
has caused the Debian Bug report #1091004,
regarding python-ring-doorbell: autopkgtest needs update for new v
Your message dated Thu, 09 Jan 2025 16:38:45 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1075218: fixed in libx86 1.1+ds1-13
has caused the Debian Bug report #1075218,
regarding libx86: ftbfs with GCC-14
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Your message dated Thu, 9 Jan 2025 16:35:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1090168: simplemonitor: FTBFS: E ModuleNotFoundError:
No module named 'firebase_messaging'
has caused the Debian Bug report #1090168,
regarding simplemonitor: FTBFS: E ModuleNotFoundError: No module named
Processing control commands:
> reopen 1088548 !
Bug #1088548 {Done: Paul Gevers } [src:nwipe] src:nwipe:
fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on 32 bits archs
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need t
Control: reopen 1088548 !
Control: affects 1088548 forensics-extra
Dear maintainer,
I am reopening this bug because the 0.37-2 revision remains causing a FTBFS.
Regards,
Eriberto
Your message dated Thu, 09 Jan 2025 17:29:09 +0100
with message-id <14e7725b-9b6d-4ec4-82e2-4c2d33a40...@coucouf.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#1091559: okular: FTBFS on i386: build-dependency not
installable: libpoppler-qt6-dev (>= 22.02.0~)
has caused the Debian Bug report #1091559,
regarding okul
okular i386 is nos RMed
Le 28 décembre 2024 17:30:48 GMT+01:00, Lucas Nussbaum a
écrit :
>Source: okular
>Version: 4:24.12.0-1
>Severity: serious
>Justification: FTBFS
>Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
>User: lu...@debian.org
>Usertags: ftbfs-20241228 ftbfs-trixie
>
>Hi,
>
>During a rebuild of all package
Am Thu, Jan 09, 2025 at 04:29:30PM +0100 schrieb Chris Hofstaedtler:
* Markus Blatt [250109 16:24]:
Hi,
the binary rebuild for version 2024.10+ds-3+b3 on January 7 failed on all
architectures, see [1]
and particularly [2] for amd64. The rebuilds were probably done for the
python3.13 as defau
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 1091452 Prevent testing migration until it uses a non-buggy, released
> version supporting wlroots 0.18
Bug #1091452 [phoc] Prevent testing migration
Changed Bug title to 'Prevent testing migration until it uses a non-buggy,
released ver
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 09, 2025 at 04:47:09PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Dec 2024 08:43:09 +0100 Guido =?iso-8859-1?Q?G=FCnther?=
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > On Thu, Dec 26, 2024 at 05:27:01PM +0100, Guido Günther wrote:
> > > Package: phoc
> > > Version: 0.44~rc1-1
> > > Severity: grave
On Fri, 27 Dec 2024 08:43:09 +0100 Guido =?iso-8859-1?Q?G=FCnther?=
wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 26, 2024 at 05:27:01PM +0100, Guido Günther wrote:
> Package: phoc
> Version: 0.44~rc1-1
> Severity: grave
>
> Let's prevent testing migration until we upload the non-rc version.
p-m-s migrated (althoug
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 1092587 https://salsa.debian.org/freexian-team/debusine/-/issues/617
Bug #1092587 [src:debusine] debusine: autopkgtests are flaky on s390x
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://salsa.debian.org/freexian-team/debusine/-/issues/617'.
>
Your message dated Thu, 09 Jan 2025 15:42:42 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1089506: fixed in lua-json 1.3.4-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1089506,
regarding lua-json needs to handle API change in lua-lpeg
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
* Markus Blatt [250109 16:24]:
> Hi,
>
> the binary rebuild for version 2024.10+ds-3+b3 on January 7 failed on all
> architectures, see [1]
> and particularly [2] for amd64. The rebuilds were probably done for the
> python3.13 as default
> transition [3].
>
> I have just triggered a rebuild on
Your message dated Thu, 09 Jan 2025 15:27:16 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1084204: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #763824,
regarding writes archives with checksums itself deems wrong
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Thu, 09 Jan 2025 15:27:16 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1084204: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1072586,
regarding libtar: keep out of testing for removal from unstable
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pro
Your message dated Thu, 09 Jan 2025 15:28:15 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1082424: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1054939,
regarding threadscope: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependency:
libghc-ghc-events-dev (< 0.18) but 0.19.0.1-1+b2 is to be inst
Hi,
> * Is libzfs6linux meant to be included in trixie?
Yes.
> * If yes, do you see a risk of rendering a system unbootable if
>libzfs_core.so.3 would go missing?
Yes. libzfs_core is used by many important userspace tools (zfs, zpool, zed,
etc.).
Without them users may not be able to mount
Your message dated Thu, 09 Jan 2025 15:22:58 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1092244: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1078383,
regarding ppx-tools: FTBFS: make: *** [debian/rules:7: binary] Error 25
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Hi,
the binary rebuild for version 2024.10+ds-3+b3 on January 7 failed on all
architectures, see [1]
and particularly [2] for amd64. The rebuilds were probably done for the
python3.13 as default
transition [3].
I have just triggered a rebuild on my system using and amd64 sid chroot. This
succ
Your message dated Thu, 09 Jan 2025 15:22:15 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1092274: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1075388,
regarding pidgin-nateon: ftbfs with GCC-14
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w
I think I've found a reasonably viable fix, now awaiting review as
https://salsa.debian.org/freexian-team/debusine/-/merge_requests/1548.
--
Colin Watson (he/him) [cjwat...@debian.org]
Your message dated Thu, 09 Jan 2025 15:18:44 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1092561: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1081526,
regarding lightdm-remote-session-freerdp2: Stop using freerdp2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the prob
Package: libzfs6linux
Version: 2.3.0~rc5-1~exp1
Severity: serious
Justification: file loss in upgrade
User: helm...@debian.org
Usertags: dep17p1
Hi,
the files
- /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libzfs_core.so.3
- /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libzfs_core.so.3.0.0
are installed by both libzfs6linux and by
Your message dated Thu, 09 Jan 2025 14:46:57 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1090989: fixed in collectd 5.12.0-22.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1090989,
regarding armhf should be removed from the libxen-dev Build-Depends
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
Control: tags -1 + patch
The new userv FTBFS seems to be trivially fixed by setting
"Rules-Requires-Root: binary-targets" in debian/control. Adding that
caused a build in a sid chroot using pbuilder to go from failing to
succeeding, anyway.
I think using "binary-targets" is pretty much inev
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + patch
Bug #1092417 [src:userv] userv: FTBFS: make[2]: *** [Makefile:80: install]
Error 1
Added tag(s) patch.
--
1092417: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1092417
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Your message dated Thu, 09 Jan 2025 13:34:16 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1060434: fixed in jansi1 1.18-3.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1060434,
regarding ftbfs: usr/share/java/jansi1.jar is a symlink of a non-exist file
jansi1-1.18.jar
to be marked as done.
This means that y
Your message dated Thu, 9 Jan 2025 13:21:24 +
with message-id
and subject line Re: [Pkg-privacy-maintainers] Bug#1081871: mat2: FTBFS:
AssertionError: '0' not found in 'Limited',thanks
has caused the Debian Bug report #1081871,
regarding mat2: FTBFS: AssertionError: '0' not found in 'Limited'
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> fixed 1081871 0.13.5-1
Bug #1081871 [src:mat2] mat2: FTBFS: AssertionError: '0' not found in 'Limited'
Marked as fixed in versions mat2/0.13.5-1.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1081871: https://bu
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> affects 1091444 src:persalys
Bug #1091444 [src:openturns] Fails to build with swig 4.3.0
Added indication that 1091444 affects src:persalys
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1091444: https://bugs.deb
It's version 0.13.4-2.1 and it has the assertion error.
Sorry, my bad, I overlooked this: *this* error is probably caused by
libimage-exiftool-perl/13.10+dfsg-1, uploaded on 2024/12/21.
It *should* be fixed via mat2/0.13.5-1, which is incoming, at least
that's what my local machine tells me, an
Le jeu. 9 janv. 2025 à 14:06, Chris Hofstaedtler a écrit :
> Hi Jérémy,
>
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 04:45:44PM +0100, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> > Package: lua-json
> > Followup-For: Bug #1089506
> >
> > I contacted Bernd Zeimetz, who is okay to move the lua-json to Lua Team.
> >
> > Which I'm going to
Hi Jérémy,
On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 04:45:44PM +0100, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> Package: lua-json
> Followup-For: Bug #1089506
>
> I contacted Bernd Zeimetz, who is okay to move the lua-json to Lua Team.
>
> Which I'm going to do later today, with the aforementioned patch,
> and if possible, enabling t
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 1092587 serious
Bug #1092587 [src:debusine] debusine: autopkgtests are flaky on s390x
Severity set to 'serious' from 'grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1092587: https://bugs.debian.or
Your message dated Thu, 09 Jan 2025 12:21:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1091190: fixed in pocl 6.0-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1091190,
regarding pocl: autopkgtest regression in rdeps since switch to llvm 18
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
On Thu, Jan 09, 2025 at 11:36:22AM +, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> debusine autopkgtest are flaky and fail most of the runs on s390x:
>
> https://ci.debian.net/packages/d/debusine/testing/s390x/
I see similar failures occasionally locally, but rarely enough that it's
been hard to debug. I just hit
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 1081871
Bug #1081871 {Done: Georg Faerber } [src:mat2] mat2: FTBFS:
AssertionError: '0' not found in 'Limited'
Bug reopened
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1081871 to the same values
previously set
> thanks
Stopping proce
On 25-01-09 12:52:11, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Please take a look at this build log which I just triggered in
> reproducible-builds:
>
> https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rbuild/unstable/amd64/mat2_0.13.4-2.1.rbuild.log.gz
>
> It's version 0.13.4-2.1 and it has the assertion error.
Sor
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notfixed 1081871 0.13.4-2.1
Bug #1081871 {Done: Georg Faerber } [src:mat2] mat2: FTBFS:
AssertionError: '0' not found in 'Limited'
No longer marked as fixed in versions mat2/0.13.4-2.1.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> fixed 1081871 0.13.4-2.1
Bug #1081871 {Done: Georg Faerber } [src:mat2] mat2: FTBFS:
AssertionError: '0' not found in 'Limited'
Marked as fixed in versions mat2/0.13.4-2.1.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assista
El 9/1/25 a las 12:46, Georg Faerber escribió:
The last occurrence was fixed via 0.13.4-2.1 as indicated above.
Please take a look at this build log which I just triggered in
reproducible-builds:
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rbuild/unstable/amd64/mat2_0.13.4-2.1.rbuild.log.gz
Your message dated Thu, 9 Jan 2025 11:46:49 +
with message-id
and subject line Re: [Pkg-privacy-maintainers] Bug#1081871: mat2: FTBFS:
AssertionError: '0' not found in 'Limited',thanks
has caused the Debian Bug report #1081871,
regarding mat2: FTBFS: AssertionError: '0' not found in 'Limited'
1 - 100 of 134 matches
Mail list logo
