Processing control commands:
> tags -1 pending
Bug #1077947 [src:gmemusage] gmemusage: FTBFS: gmemusage.c:713:30: error:
passing argument 2 of ‘signal’ from incompatible pointer type
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1077947: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1077947
Debian Bug Tracking
Control: tags -1 pending
Thanks
Hi,
as per ITS I have uploaded the package to delayed=10.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
https://fam-tille.de
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 pending
Bug #1055607 [gmemusage] gmemusage crashes immediately
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1055607: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1055607
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 1082039 src:php8.2
Bug #1082039 [php] php: Serious memory leaks in PHP 8.2.20 causes application
crashes
Bug reassigned from package 'php' to 'src:php8.2'.
No longer marked as found in versions 8.2.20-1~deb12u1, php-cli, and 8.2.20-1.
Ig
Your message dated Mon, 02 Dec 2024 07:19:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1088859: fixed in deluge 2.1.2~dev0+20240910-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1088859,
regarding deluge-web typo in dependency on python-legacy-cgi
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
Hi Jonas,
On Sun, Dec 01, 2024 at 11:57:52PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Quoting Helmut Grohne (2024-12-01 22:02:27)
> > Package: eye
> > Version: 1:10.30.11~ds-1
> > Severity: serious
> > User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> > Usertags: fileconflict
> > Control: affects -1 + ruby-eye
> >
> >
On 12/2/24 07:49, Peter Van Eynde wrote:
> The fix for #1087842 was not complete I fear. deluge-web still has a
> dependency on `python-legacy-cgi` instead of `python3-legacy-cgi`
thanks, indeed :(
I've just uploaded it with that correction.
Regards,
Daniel
Package: deluge-web
Version: 2.1.2~dev0+20240910-1
Severity: grave
Dear Maintainer,
The fix for #1087842 was not complete I fear. deluge-web still has a
dependency on `python-legacy-cgi` instead of `python3-legacy-cgi`, see
https://git.progress-linux.org/users/daniel.baumann/debian/packages/delu
Hi ppc64el porters, Sean,
@porters, can you please have a look at the ppc64el autopkgtest
regressions caused by sbcl [1]?
On 12/2/24 03:36, Sean Whitton wrote:
I don't think I can do anything about this bug. Upstream aren't able to
reproduce it. I don't think it makes sense to block sbcl's
Processing control commands:
> fixed -1 3.3.7-1
Bug #988036 [postfixadmin] Multiple errors that make the package unusable
Bug #965075 [postfixadmin] postfixadmin: wrong alias in postfixadmin
conf-available for apache2
Marked as fixed in versions postfixadmin/3.3.7-1.
Marked as fixed in versions p
Control: fixed -1 3.3.7-1
Processing control commands:
> reopen -1
Bug #988036 {Done: Jing } [postfixadmin] Multiple errors that
make the package unusable
Bug #965075 {Done: Jing } [postfixadmin] postfixadmin: wrong
alias in postfixadmin conf-available for apache2
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed
Control: reopen -1
Control: tags -1 +fixed
let this bug be auto-closed, otherwise mentor.d.n complains
On 12/1/24 10:10 PM, Lorenz wrote:
Sorry to be annoying here, but I just discovered that the stable version ist
still vulnerable.
You can get the fixed version from bookworm-proposed-updates.
https://www.debian.org/releases/proposed-updates
https://wiki.debian.org/StableProposedUpdates
Kin
Processing control commands:
> close -1
Bug #988036 {Done: Jing } [postfixadmin] Multiple errors that
make the package unusable
Bug #965075 {Done: Jing } [postfixadmin] postfixadmin: wrong
alias in postfixadmin conf-available for apache2
Bug 988036 is already marked as done; not doing anything.
Control: close -1
Processing control commands:
> close -1
Bug #965075 [postfixadmin] postfixadmin: wrong alias in postfixadmin
conf-available for apache2
Bug #988036 [postfixadmin] Multiple errors that make the package unusable
Marked Bug as done
Marked Bug as done
--
965075: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugr
Control: close -1
Your message dated Mon, 02 Dec 2024 03:05:18 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1076063: fixed in ruby-mpi 0.4.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1076063,
regarding ruby-mpi: FTBFS with mpich as default MPI implementation on 32 bit
architectures: mpi.c:64:13: error: ‘MPI_2COMPLEX’ unde
Your message dated Mon, 02 Dec 2024 03:05:18 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1077402: fixed in ruby-mpi 0.4.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1077402,
regarding ruby-mpi: FTBFS: anyargs.h:337:142: error: passing argument 3 of
‘rb_define_module_function_m1’ from incompatible pointer
Your message dated Mon, 02 Dec 2024 02:44:20 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1088128: fixed in robocode 1.9.3.9-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1088128,
regarding robocode: FTBFS: dh_install: warning: Cannot find (any matches for)
"robocode.api/target/site/apidocs/*"
to be marked a
Hello Release Team,
I don't think I can do anything about this bug. Upstream aren't able to
reproduce it. I don't think it makes sense to block sbcl's migration on
this. I think that either we should ignore the cl-ironclad test failure
on ppc64el or remove sbcl on that architecture, if you thin
Just FTR, the patch I had tried to add to the sphinxbase package to try
to get pocketsphinx-python expose a proper __iter__ method. It does
return a new object, but doesn't duplicate ptr, thus deemed to get
duplicate frees and whatnot.
Samuel
Samuel Thibault, le lun. 02 déc. 2024 02:58:51 +0100,
Hello,
Graham Inggs, le sam. 30 nov. 2024 17:41:54 +, a ecrit:
> The autopkgtests of this package fail with Python 3.13 [1].
It looks like python 3.13 now requires the iterator (not just the
interable) to provide an __iter__ method. I don't see how to do that
with the pocketsphinx interface:
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1076063 [src:ruby-mpi] ruby-mpi: FTBFS with mpich as default MPI
implementation on 32 bit architectures: mpi.c:64:13: error: ‘MPI_2COMPLEX’
undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘MPI_COMPLEX’?
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1076063:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1076063 in ruby-mpi reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-mpi/-/commit/8280f1c15543ba6b9ca58108f984
Quoting Helmut Grohne (2024-12-01 22:02:27)
> Package: eye
> Version: 1:10.30.11~ds-1
> Severity: serious
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: fileconflict
> Control: affects -1 + ruby-eye
>
> eye has an undeclared file conflict. This may result in an unpack error
> from dpkg.
Is it not
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1088128 [src:robocode] robocode: FTBFS: dh_install: warning: Cannot find
(any matches for) "robocode.api/target/site/apidocs/*"
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1088128: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1088128
Debian Bug Tracking Syst
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1088128 in robocode reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/robocode/-/commit/51474dcce66b30f599f4b0e1833b
Your message dated Sun, 1 Dec 2024 22:43:57 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1088837: starpu-contrib: rebuild against libopenmpi40
has caused the Debian Bug report #1088837,
regarding starpu-contrib: rebuild against libopenmpi40
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that t
Hi,
Sorry to be annoying here, but I just discovered that the stable version
ist still vulnerable.
On Fri, 15 Nov 2024 05:12:08 +0100 Sebastiaan Couwenberg
wrote:
On 11/14/24 9:05 PM, Louis-Philippe Véronneau wrote:
> I think this bug should be reopen and a security upload should be made ASA
Your message dated Sun, 01 Dec 2024 21:05:52 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1086337: fixed in libcreg 20240419-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1086337,
regarding libcreg FTBFS on 32-bit with gcc 14
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + ruby-eye
Bug #1088839 [eye] eye has an undeclared file conflict on /usr/bin/eye
Added indication that 1088839 affects ruby-eye
--
1088839: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1088839
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.or
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + fuseext2
Bug #1088838 [fuse2fs] fuse2fs: ineffective Replaces due to /usr-move (DEP17 P1)
Added indication that 1088838 affects fuseext2
> tags 1078693 + patch
Bug #1078693 [src:e2fsprogs] e2fsprogs: introduced a bootstrap dependency cycle
with libarchi
Package: eye
Version: 1:10.30.11~ds-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: fileconflict
Control: affects -1 + ruby-eye
eye has an undeclared file conflict. This may result in an unpack error
from dpkg.
The file /usr/bin/eye is contained in the packages
* eye/1:10.30.11~ds
Package: fuse2fs
Version: 1.47.2~rc1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Control: affects -1 + fuseext2
Control: tags 1078693 + patch
Hi Ted,
I see that you are restructuring e2fsprogs and are taking over fuseext2
from uml. That's a good thing, but it unfortunately comes with /usr-move
implications a
Source: starpu-contrib
Version: 1.4.5+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
Please rebuild starpu-contrib for the ongoing openmpi transition.
Cheers,
Emilio
Your message dated Sun, 01 Dec 2024 20:39:01 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1075234: fixed in lordsawar 0.3.2+frogknows-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1075234,
regarding lordsawar: ftbfs with GCC-14
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Sun, 1 Dec 2024 14:40:10 -0600
with message-id <26444.51626.973658.577...@rob.eddelbuettel.com>
has caused the report #1088834,
regarding gretl: FTBFS: LaTeX Error: Command \theHscript already defined
to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software
author(s) Alli
Your message dated Sun, 01 Dec 2024 20:36:37 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1081126: fixed in gfpoken 1-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #1081126,
regarding gfpoken: FTBFS: ‘return’ with no value in function returning int
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the prob
Your message dated Sun, 01 Dec 2024 21:23:05 +0100
with message-id <51611628-d0a0-43e7-8466-1a3cdbd03...@debian.org>
and subject line Fixes in 24.08.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1082547,
regarding kaccounts-providers: system-settings crashes when creating new online
account
to be marked as
On 2024-12-01, at 22:36:07 +0800, Bo YU wrote:
> Control: tags -1 patch
>
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 02:05:53PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> ...
> > x11/propwatch.c: In function ‘RebuildList’:
> > x11/propwatch.c:319:43: error: passing argument 2 of ‘XawListChange’ from
> > incompatible
Processing control commands:
> fixed -1 4:24.08.1-1
Bug #1082547 [kaccounts-providers] kaccounts-providers: system-settings crashes
when creating new online account
Marked as fixed in versions kaccounts-providers/4:24.08.1-1.
--
1082547: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1082547
control: fixed -1 4:24.08.1-1
On Thu, 08 Aug 2024 18:27:02 +0200 Andrea Pappacoda wrote:
Hi Bernhard, writing to you directly since sometimes the BTS discards
emails.
Could you please let me know if you have plans for upgrading bctoolbox
to a new upstream version from the 5.3 branch? It's needed to continue
with the mbed
Source: gretl
Version: 2024c-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Hi,
During a rebuild for the openmpi transition, your package failed to build.
Here's the (hopefully) relevant part of the log:
make -C doc
make[4]: Entering directory '/<>/addons/gig/doc'
This is pdfTeX, Version 3.141592653-2.6-1.40.2
Source: chuck
Version: 1.5.2.5-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 1.5.4.1-1
Tags: sid trixie ftbfs
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
User: debian-powe...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ppc64el
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-powe...@lists.debian.org
Dear maintainer(s),
The R
Your message dated Sun, 01 Dec 2024 19:34:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1086469: fixed in libregf 20240421-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1086469,
regarding libregf FTBFS on 32-bit with gcc 14
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1079539 + experimental
Bug #1079539 {Done: Nicholas D Steeves }
[src:plasma-gmailfeed] plasma-gmailfeed: Plasma 6 transition
Added tag(s) experimental.
> tags 1088648 + sid trixie
Bug #1088648 {Done: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort } [ruby-vips]
vip
Processing control commands:
> close -1 1.5.4.1-1
Bug #1088832 [src:chuck] src:chuck: fails to migrate to testing for too long:
FTBFS on ppc64el
Marked as fixed in versions chuck/1.5.4.1-1.
Bug #1088832 [src:chuck] src:chuck: fails to migrate to testing for too long:
FTBFS on ppc64el
Marked Bug
Processing control commands:
> close -1 2019.2.0~git20190418.c92dcb0-4
Bug #1088831 [src:dijitso] src:dijitso: fails to migrate to testing for too
long: autopkgtest failure
Marked as fixed in versions dijitso/2019.2.0~git20190418.c92dcb0-4.
Bug #1088831 [src:dijitso] src:dijitso: fails to migrate
Source: dijitso
Version: 2019.2.0~git20190418.c92dcb0-3
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 2019.2.0~git20190418.c92dcb0-4
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between test
Processing control commands:
> close -1 1:2022.3.0-3
Bug #1088830 [src:ufl] src:ufl: fails to migrate to testing for too long:
autopkgtest failure
Marked as fixed in versions ufl/1:2022.3.0-3.
Bug #1088830 [src:ufl] src:ufl: fails to migrate to testing for too long:
autopkgtest failure
Marked Bu
Processing control commands:
> reopen -1
Bug #1067251 {Done: Debian FTP Masters }
[src:rust-isahc] rust-isahc FTBFS with polling 3
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
Bug reopened
No longer m
Source: ufl
Version: 1:2022.3.0-2
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 1:2022.3.0-3
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days
Control: reopen -1
Messed up the control command earlier, sorry.
--
Best,
Ananthu
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Processing control commands:
> reopen =
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> tags -1 ftbfs
Bug #1067251 {Done: Debian FTP Masters }
[src:rust-isahc] rust-isahc FTBFS with polling 3
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1067251 to the same tags previously set
> tags -1 + experime
Package: rust-isahc
Version: 1.7.2+ds-29
Followup-For: Bug #1067251
Control: reopen =
Control: tags -1 ftbfs
Control: tags -1 + experimental
Control: tags -1 + patch
Dear Maintainer,
This bug was closed as rust-isahc was removed from the archive, but
now that rust-isahc is in experimental again,
* Michele Martone [2024-11-30 12:14]:
On 20241129@23:10, Santiago Vila wrote:
Package: src:librsb
Version: 1.3.0.2+dfsg-6.1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[…]
thanks for spotting this.
I can repro
Hi,
I was triaging zabbix for LTS, and could come up with some details for
the vulnerabilites below.
CVE-2024-36467 has been fixed in upstream version 7.0.3rc1
CVE-2024-42327 has been fixed in upstream version 7.0.1rc1
(upstream commit
https://github.com/zabbix/zabbix/commit/9256f8d933a50a46
Potential fix posted at
https://salsa.debian.org/agx/git-buildpackage/-/merge_requests/19
Source: python-voip-utils
Version: 0.2.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: python3.13
__ ERROR collecting tests/test_sip.py
__
ImportError while importing test module '/build/reproducible-path/python-voip-
utils-0
Source: gpaw
Version: 24.6.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gpaw&arch=amd64&ver=24.6.0-1%2Bb2&stamp=1732919872&raw=0
ImportError while importing test module
'/<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.12/build/gpaw/defects/__init__.py'.
Hint: make sure your test modul
Your message dated Sun, 01 Dec 2024 17:19:49 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1075886: fixed in ruby-cssbundling-rails 1.4.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1075886,
regarding ruby-cssbundling-rails: Command install failed, ensure yarn is
installed
to be marked as done.
This means
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1088802 + upstream
Bug #1088802 [src:neutron] neutron: CVE-2024-53916
Added tag(s) upstream.
> forwarded 1088802 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/935883
Bug #1088802 [src:neutron] neutron: CVE-2024-53916
Set Bug forwarded-to-a
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 1088718 https://github.com/googlefonts/fontmake/issues/1080
Bug #1088718 [src:fonts-joscelyn] fonts-joscelyn: FTBFS: dh_install: warning:
Cannot find (any matches for) "instance_otf/*.otf"
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://githu
Hi Michael,
Am Sat, Sep 21, 2024 at 10:45:06PM +0200 schrieb Michael Banck:
> > I'd be very happy if you could do so. In case you have time constraints
> > I might have a look in case it would pop up next time as Bug of the Day
> > candidate.
>
> I fixed the testsuite yesterday, but once it actu
Your message dated Sun, 01 Dec 2024 16:49:21 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1081123: fixed in nim-hts 0.3.25+ds-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1081123,
regarding nim-hts: FTBFS with gcc-14
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If th
Package: simplesamlphp
Severity: grave
Tags: trixie sid
The current package in testing and unstable is version 1.19. Upstream no
longer supports this version. There's a 2.x series which should be
packaged.
There are a number of changes required for packaging 2.x. Most notably
the list of shipped
Source: kanboard
X-Debbugs-CC: t...@security.debian.org
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Hi,
The following vulnerabilities were published for kanboard.
CVE-2024-51747[0]:
| Kanboard is project management software that focuses on the Kanban
| methodology. An authenticated Kanboard admin can read an
Your message dated Sun, 01 Dec 2024 15:56:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1086339: fixed in libevtx 20240504-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1086339,
regarding libevtx FTBFS on i386 with gcc 14
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Your message dated Sun, 01 Dec 2024 15:50:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#953935: fixed in fuse-convmvfs 0.2.6-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #953935,
regarding fuse-convmvfs: Switch from deprecated to
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1084238 in android-platform-art reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/android-tools-team/android-platform-art/-/co
Processing control commands:
> severity 1088767 serious
Bug #1088767 [libopenmpi-dev] ldconfig: Cannot mmap file
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libprrte.so.
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
--
1088767: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1088767
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1084238 [src:android-platform-art] android-platform-art: FTBFS: error:
declaration of 'Filter' shadows template parameter
[-Wstrict-primary-template-shadow]
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1084238: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=10
Control: tags -1 patch
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 02:05:53PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
...
x11/propwatch.c: In function ‘RebuildList’:
x11/propwatch.c:319:43: error: passing argument 2 of ‘XawListChange’ from
incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
319 | XawListChange(
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 patch
Bug #1088044 [src:xawtv] xawtv: FTBFS: error: passing argument 2 of
‘XawListChange’ from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
Added tag(s) patch.
--
1088044: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1088044
Debian Bug Tra
On Sun, Dec 01, 2024 at 12:42:14PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Julian,
>
> On 10/14/24 20:58, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > (3) Compatibility issues: As discussed, the version of emscripten is
> > closely tied to the versions of LLVM and binaryen, and not necessarily
> > in a reliable way. I sugges
On Sun, 17 Nov 2024 19:31:22 -0800 =?UTF-8?B?T3R0byBLZWvDpGzDpGluZW4=?= <
o...@debian.org> wrote:
> From https://peps.python.org/pep-0594/#pipes
>
> > The pipes module provides helpers to pipe the input of one command into
the output of another
> > command. The module is built on top of os.popen. U
Processing control commands:
> forwarded -1 https://github.com/pst-format/libpst/pull/11
Bug #1086237 [src:libpst] libpst FTBFS on 32-bit with gcc 14
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://github.com/pst-format/libpst/pull/11'.
> tags -1 + fixed-upstream patch
Bug #1086237 [src:libpst] libpst FT
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/pst-format/libpst/pull/11
Control: tags -1 + fixed-upstream patch
On Tue, 2024-10-29 at 14:51 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> ...
> libpst.c: In function 'pst_read_block_size':
> libpst.c:3832:36: error: passing argument 2 of 'uncompress' from incompatible
>
Hi Julian,
On 10/14/24 20:58, Julian Gilbey wrote:
(3) Compatibility issues: As discussed, the version of emscripten is
closely tied to the versions of LLVM and binaryen, and not necessarily
in a reliable way. I suggest that we add some sort of script in
debian/, that is called from both uscan
Hello Release Team,
I don't think I can do anything about this bug. Upstream aren't able to
reproduce it. I don't think it makes sense to block sbcl's migration on
this. I think that either we should ignore the cl-ironclad test failure
on ppc64el or remove sbcl on that architecture, if you thin
Source: ruby-msgpack
Version: 1.4.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: ftbfs patch
Control: block 1082419 by -1
Hi,
Bug 1082419 is blocked by a FTBFS on ppc64el. The issue seems to be
(judging from the error log) that auto_compact is used during testing,
but that isn't implemented on ppc64el.
Processing control commands:
> block 1082419 by -1
Bug #1082419 {Done: Paul Gevers } [src:ruby-msgpack]
src:ruby-msgpack: fails to migrate to testing for too long
1082419 was not blocked by any bugs.
1082419 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 1082419: 1088785
--
1082419: https:
Your message dated Sun, 01 Dec 2024 10:49:05 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1088345: fixed in fenics-dolfinx 1:0.9.0-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1088345,
regarding fenics-dolfinx: FTBFS on mips64el: test failures
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Hi,
one more patch was needed. This was now fixed in -10 upload.
Ondrej
> On 30. 11. 2024, at 9:17, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>
> On 29/11/2024 17:26, Ondřej Surý wrote:
>> Thanks, feel free to do direct NMU if you have time. I finally gave in to
>> all the various pathogens my kids brou
Your message dated Sun, 01 Dec 2024 10:20:59 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1088649: fixed in php-imagick 3.7.0-10
has caused the Debian Bug report #1088649,
regarding php-imagick: autopkgtest failure
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
Your message dated Sun, 01 Dec 2024 10:05:37 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1074921: fixed in dsh 0.25.10-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1074921,
regarding dsh: ftbfs with GCC-14
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Hi,
so when can we expect 1.8.1 to be uploaded in unstable or at least
experimental?
Regards,
Sebastian
90 matches
Mail list logo
