Your message dated Sat, 16 Nov 2024 07:49:21 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1086939: fixed in php-imagick 3.7.0-9
has caused the Debian Bug report #1086939,
regarding php-imagick: build against imagemagick 7
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dea
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1081650 + ftbfs
Bug #1081650 [src:pygattlib] FTBFS with Python 3.13
Added tag(s) ftbfs.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1081650: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1081650
Debia
Daniel Baumann (2024-11-15):
> # for some reason, bugs to udebs do not shop up on
> # tracker nor on ddpo, thus reassigning for visibility
> reassign 1087324 haveged
> thanks
Also, irk! That lost version information, and the new version migrated
to testing despite the RC bug!
Cheers,
--
Cyril
Your message dated Sat, 16 Nov 2024 03:04:22 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1074912: fixed in dircproxy 1.0.5-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #1074912,
regarding dircproxy: ftbfs with GCC-14
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If th
Your message dated Sat, 16 Nov 2024 01:20:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1084702: fixed in python-pmw 2.1-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #1084702,
regarding python-pmw: removal of Python standard libraries in Python 3.13
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Sat, 16 Nov 2024 01:05:48 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1084591: fixed in python-wikkid 0.5-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1084591,
regarding python-wikkid: removal of Python standard libraries in Python 3.13
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim tha
Your message dated Sat, 16 Nov 2024 01:05:38 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1084536: fixed in python-weblogo 3.8.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1084536,
regarding python-weblogo: removal of Python standard libraries in Python 3.13
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1084617 in python-pdbfixer reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/python-pdbfixer/-/commit/147
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1084617 [src:python-pdbfixer] python-pdbfixer: removal of Python standard
libraries in Python 3.13
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1084617: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1084617
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.
Your message dated Fri, 15 Nov 2024 22:09:26 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1075131: fixed in latexila 3.22.0-1.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1075131,
regarding latexila: ftbfs with GCC-14
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If t
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 1084528 serious
Bug #1084528 [src:beancount] beancount: removal of Python standard libraries in
Python 3.13
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> severity 1084535 serious
Bug #1084535 [src:qtwebengine-opensource-src] qtwebengine-o
Hi,
On 2024-11-15 22:07, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
> Source: python-ptrace
> Version: 0.9.9-0.1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: ftbfs
>
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=python-
> ptrace&arch=riscv64&ver=0.9.9-0.1%2Bb2&stamp=1731547088&raw=0
>
> It looks like there are two test failu
Source: python-ptrace
Version: 0.9.9-0.1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=python-
ptrace&arch=riscv64&ver=0.9.9-0.1%2Bb2&stamp=1731547088&raw=0
It looks like there are two test failures caused by "OverflowError: Python int
too large to convert to C long
Your message dated Fri, 15 Nov 2024 19:35:24 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1082326: fixed in proftpd-dfsg 1.3.8.b+dfsg-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1082326,
regarding Supplemental Group Inheritance Grants Unintended Access to GID 0
to be marked as done.
This means that you cla
Package: pcsxr
Version: 1.9.94-6
Followup-For: Bug #1075366
Hi,
Here is a patch to solve those building issues.
Best regards,
Patrice
-- System Information:
Debian Release: trixie/sid
APT prefers unstable-debug
APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'unstable'), (1,
'experimental-debu
On 2024-11-11 11:56:18 +0100, Andre Noll wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 03, 22:02, Andre Noll wrote
>
> > > So that doesn't support binNMUs then. Instead of handling that with
> > > custom code, please check dpkg's /usr/share/dpkg/pkg-info.mk which does
> > > all of that and can handle binNMU versions.
> >
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 1055474 5.1.3+ds-1
Bug #1055474 [src:redmine] redmine: CVE-2023-47258 CVE-2023-47259 CVE-2023-47260
Marked as fixed in versions redmine/5.1.3+ds-1.
Bug #1055474 [src:redmine] redmine: CVE-2023-47258 CVE-2023-47259 CVE-2023-47260
Marked Bug a
(Adding debian-boot@ back, and quoting in full accordingly.)
Daniel Baumann (2024-11-15):
> # for some reason, bugs to udebs do not shop up on
> # tracker nor on ddpo, thus reassigning for visibility
> reassign 1087324 haveged
> thanks
>
> On 11/11/24 13:08, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > haveged do
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # for some reason, bugs to udebs do not shop up on
> # tracker nor on ddpo, thus reassigning for visibility
> reassign 1087324 haveged
Bug #1087324 [haveged-udeb] haveged-udeb: fails to start: haveged_sem error:
ENOENT
Bug reassigned from package
# for some reason, bugs to udebs do not shop up on
# tracker nor on ddpo, thus reassigning for visibility
reassign 1087324 haveged
thanks
On 11/11/24 13:08, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> haveged doesn't start at all in d-i, and that's not an apparmor issue
> (#1087318):
I'll check, thanks for reportin
Your message dated Fri, 15 Nov 2024 17:47:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1087384: fixed in icinga2 2.13.6-2+deb12u2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1087384,
regarding CVE-2024-49369: Security: fix TLS certificate validation bypass.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
close 1055474 5.1.3+ds-1
thanks
Source: jellyfish
Version: 2.3.1-3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=jellyfish&arch=ppc64el&ver=2.3.1-3%2Bb7&stamp=1731546977&raw=0
unit_tests/test_cooperative_pool2.cc:86: Failure
Value of: workers.check_print()
Actual: false
Expected: true
[ FAILED
Source: sphinxbase
Version: 0.8+5prealpha+1-18
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=sphinxbase&arch=mips64el&ver=0.8%2B5prealpha%2B1-18%2Bb1&stamp=1731497702&raw=0
Sub-tests failed: WAVE2FEAT test
FAIL test-sphinx_fe-ctl.sh (exit status: 1)
-- System Info
Your message dated Fri, 15 Nov 2024 16:34:17 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1086353: fixed in apache-opennlp 2.5.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1086353,
regarding apache-opennlp: FTBFS: autobuilder hangs
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Fri, 15 Nov 2024 16:22:02 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1087563: fixed in pcre2 10.44-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1087563,
regarding pcre2: FTBFS on armel: RunTest and pcre2_jit_test segfault
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Fri, 15 Nov 2024 15:20:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1087562: fixed in pcre2 10.44-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1087562,
regarding pcre2: FTBFS on mips64el: ld: unrecognised emulation mode: elf
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the prob
Your message dated Fri, 15 Nov 2024 16:07:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1075680: fixed in xscavenger 1.4.5-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #1075680,
regarding xscavenger: ftbfs with GCC-14
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Fri, 15 Nov 2024 16:04:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1074915: fixed in discount 2.2.7-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1074915,
regarding discount: ftbfs with GCC-14
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If th
On 11/15/24 16:47, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> That's great, thanks!
thanks for finding and reporting it ;)
Regards,
Daniel
On Fri, 15 Nov 2024 at 15:45, Daniel Baumann wrote:
>
> On 11/15/24 16:38, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > Upstream has provided a fix:
>
> thanks, I've seen it and already uploaded it 15min ago.
>
> Regards,
> Daniel
That's great, thanks!
Your message dated Fri, 15 Nov 2024 15:49:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1087516: fixed in libnvme 1.11-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1087516,
regarding libnvme: libkeyutils support breaks usage on Debian kernel with no
TLS support
to be marked as done.
This means that you c
Control: tags 1081480 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for zfec (versioned as 1.5.7.4-0.2) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
--
cheers,
Emmanuel Arias
?
? eam...@de
Processing control commands:
> tags 1081480 + pending
Bug #1081480 [src:zfec] FTBFS with Python 3.13
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1081480: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1081480
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
On 11/15/24 16:38, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> Upstream has provided a fix:
thanks, I've seen it and already uploaded it 15min ago.
Regards,
Daniel
On 2024-11-15 15:15:35 +0100, Alban Browaeys wrote:
> Le mardi 12 novembre 2024 à 15:48 +0100, Vincent Lefevre a écrit :
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 2024-10-11 09:16:26 +0200, Alban Browaeys wrote:
> > > Upstream in https://github.com/libunwind/libunwind/issues/672 for
> > > 1.8.
> >
> > This is unclear.
Control: tags -1 patch
On Thu, 14 Nov 2024 16:04:27 + Luca Boccassi
wrote:
> Source: libnvme
> Version: 1.11-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: breaks autopkgtest of another package
> Forwarded: https://github.com/linux-nvme/nvme-cli/issues/2573
>
> Dear Maintainer(s),
>
> libnvme since v
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 patch
Bug #1087516 [src:libnvme] libnvme: libkeyutils support breaks usage on Debian
kernel with no TLS support
Added tag(s) patch.
--
1087516: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1087516
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.o
Control: tags 1065972 + patch
Control: tags 1065972 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for pngphoon (versioned as 1.3-3.1) and uploaded it to
DELAYED/XX. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer.
Regards.
diff -Nru pngphoon-1.3/debian/changelog pngphoon-1.3/debian/cha
Processing control commands:
> tags 1065972 + patch
Bug #1065972 [src:pngphoon] pngphoon: FTBFS on arm{el,hf}: tws.c:40:13: error:
conflicting types for ‘time’; have ‘long int()’
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 1065972 + pending
Bug #1065972 [src:pngphoon] pngphoon: FTBFS on arm{el,hf}: tws.c:40:13: e
On Fri, 15 Nov 2024 at 15:16:04 +0100, Alban Browaeys wrote:
> Upgrading to 1.8.1 would fix this bug. If it is doable let's do it. But
> it might requires a migration of the packages that depends on
> libunwind-18 (would it be libunwind-19) so I it might not help with
> these packages depending on
Your message dated Fri, 15 Nov 2024 15:32:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1086443: fixed in mpg123 1.31.2-1+deb12u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1086443,
regarding mpg123: CVE-2024-10573: buffer overflow involving "Frankenstein
streams" in versions before 1.32.8
to be marked as
Source: xmms2
Version: 0.8+dfsg-27
Severity: serious
The package FTBFS with modern cython so in #1056894 it was temporarily switched
to cython3-legacy a year ago. The time is now up and as cython3-legacy won't be
in trixie, xmms2 won't be in trixie either unless someone ports it or, if
that's poss
Control: tags -1 + patch
I believe the following change fixes the problem.
--- xscavenger-1.4.5.orig/src/scav.c
+++ xscavenger-1.4.5/src/scav.c
@@ -1578,7 +1578,7 @@ uchar *err;
if(err)
{
puts(err);
- return;
+
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + patch
Bug #1075680 [src:xscavenger] xscavenger: ftbfs with GCC-14
Added tag(s) patch.
--
1075680: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1075680
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Your message dated Fri, 15 Nov 2024 15:20:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1087564: fixed in pcre2 10.44-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1087564,
regarding pcre2: FTBFS on 32-bit: test failures, memory allocations smaller
than expected
to be marked as done.
This means that you c
Control: tags -1 help
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/PCRE2Project/pcre2/issues/565
On 15/11/2024 10:30, Simon McVittie wrote:
There is a different FTBFS on non-armel 32-bit architectures which might
also affect armel, or this might be a different failure mode with the same
root cause.
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 help
Bug #1087563 [src:pcre2] pcre2: FTBFS on armel: RunTest and pcre2_jit_test
segfault
Added tag(s) help.
> forwarded -1 https://github.com/PCRE2Project/pcre2/issues/565
Bug #1087563 [src:pcre2] pcre2: FTBFS on armel: RunTest and pcre2_jit_test
segfault
S
Le mardi 12 novembre 2024 à 15:48 +0100, Vincent Lefevre a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> On 2024-10-11 09:16:26 +0200, Alban Browaeys wrote:
> > Upstream in https://github.com/libunwind/libunwind/issues/672 for
> > 1.8.
>
> This is unclear. https://github.com/libunwind/libunwind/issues/672 is
> about 1.7.2,
Le mardi 12 novembre 2024 à 15:48 +0100, Vincent Lefevre a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> On 2024-10-11 09:16:26 +0200, Alban Browaeys wrote:
> > Upstream in https://github.com/libunwind/libunwind/issues/672 for
> > 1.8.
>
> This is unclear. https://github.com/libunwind/libunwind/issues/672 is
> about 1.7.2,
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 - help + pending
Bug #1087562 [src:pcre2] pcre2: FTBFS on mips64el: ld: unrecognised emulation
mode: elf
Removed tag(s) help.
Bug #1087562 [src:pcre2] pcre2: FTBFS on mips64el: ld: unrecognised emulation
mode: elf
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1087562: https:/
Control: tags -1 - help + pending
I would strongly recommend running dh_autoreconf. At the moment, pcre2 is
using the configure script as generated by upstream, which is not
meaningfully reviewable or bug-fixable.
Right, I've tested on eberlin, and using dh_autoreconf fixes this issue,
and th
Your message dated Fri, 15 Nov 2024 13:49:58 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1086811: fixed in python-gql 3.6.0~b2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1086811,
regarding python-gql: autopkgtest fails with python3-graphql-core >= 3.2.4-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim t
Your message dated Fri, 15 Nov 2024 08:42:15 -0500
with message-id
and subject line Re: krank fails to start
has caused the Debian Bug report #1086755,
regarding krank fails to start
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
On Fri, Nov 15, 2024 at 3:11 AM Sune Stolborg Vuorela wrote:
> I think it is going to affect all of Qt6-packages, not just Qt6Declarative. At
> least from a quick glance over other of my Qt6*Targets.cmake with private dev
> things have the same thing.
This is not a new diagnostic. Most of the oth
On 15/11/2024 12:32, Simon McVittie wrote:
[useful stuff]
Thanks, worth looking at. FTR, 10.42-4 does still build in an unstable
mips64el environment (which seemed an obvious thing to double-check).
Regards,
Matthew
On Fri, 15 Nov 2024 at 10:24:34 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> This looks like it might be a problem with some toolchain component
> (but I don't know which one), so please reassign and set "affects" on
> src:pcre2 as appropriate.
In fact I think this could be a bug that was already fixed in libto
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 1086836 normal
Bug #1086836 [src:rust-inflector] project is dead - successor seems to be cruet
Severity set to 'normal' from 'grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1086836: https://bugs.d
control: severity -1 normal
thanks
Thanks for the information. I uploaded cruet (in NEW currently).
Lowering the severity to allow timeupdates.
Cheers
Sylvestre
Hi,
I did not received the test script. Therefore I tried to to test several
6.1 kernels with the f3. Without success, I could not reproduce the errors.
The corruption of the Kingston NVMe in first M.2 Socket with 6.1.94
kernel (6.1.0-22-amd64) was first noticed in a lengthy computation where
th
Your message dated Fri, 15 Nov 2024 12:04:26 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1086946: fixed in icewm 3.6.0-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1086946,
regarding icewm FTBFS with the nocheck build profile: No rule to make target
'strtest'. Stop.
to be marked as done.
This means tha
Control: tags 1086946 + patch
Control: tags 1086946 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for icewm (versioned as 3.6.0-1.1) and
uploaded it to sid.
cu Andreas
diff -Nru icewm-3.6.0/debian/changelog icewm-3.6.0/debian/changelog
--- icewm-3.6.0/debian/changelog 2024-06-20 21:45:16.00
Processing control commands:
> tags 1086946 + patch
Bug #1086946 [src:icewm] icewm FTBFS with the nocheck build profile: No rule to
make target 'strtest'. Stop.
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1086946 to the same tags previously set
> tags 1086946 + pending
Bug #1086946 [src:icewm] icewm
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 patch
Bug #1086946 [src:icewm] icewm FTBFS with the nocheck build profile: No rule to
make target 'strtest'. Stop.
Added tag(s) patch.
--
1086946: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1086946
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debi
Control: tags -1 patch
On 2024-11-06 Helmut Grohne wrote:
> Source: icewm
> Version: 3.6.0-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: nocheck ftbfs is rc since trixie
> Tags: ftbfs trixie sid
> Hi,
> icewm fails to build from source when enabling the nocheck build
> profile. A build ends as follows
Your message dated Fri, 15 Nov 2024 12:35:41 +0100
with message-id
<5n5nn5atemrwirvdpksrie3hkmvuaj6q3gm6urgsqgjugg6wix@bpruo5ql32b4>
and subject line Re: util-linux ftbfs on kernel > 6.5
has caused the Debian Bug report #1086706,
regarding util-linux ftbfs on kernel > 6.5
to be marked as done.
Th
Control: tags -1 fixed-upstream
This is, I think, fixed in this upstream MR:
https://github.com/PCRE2Project/pcre2/pull/418
Obviously it needs applying to the Debian 10.44 package; I'll see how
1087562 goes before deciding whether to upload a 10.44 with just this patch.
Regards,
Matthew
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 fixed-upstream
Bug #1087564 [src:pcre2] pcre2: FTBFS on 32-bit: test failures, memory
allocations smaller than expected
Added tag(s) fixed-upstream.
--
1087564: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1087564
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow
Your message dated Fri, 15 Nov 2024 11:19:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1081673: fixed in python-pybedtools 0.10.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1081673,
regarding FTBFS with Python 3.13
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
On 15/11/2024 10:55, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
* Matthew Vernon [241115 11:45]:
Hm. AFAICT there is no mips64el porterbox available to test things on, only
buildds which don't have open access.
eberlin.d.o should work.
Thanks. I filtered the machine list for mips64el which explains how I
m
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1081673 in python-pybedtools reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/python-pybedtools/-/commit/333730783b2
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1081673 [src:python-pybedtools] FTBFS with Python 3.13
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1081673: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1081673
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
* Matthew Vernon [241115 11:45]:
> Hm. AFAICT there is no mips64el porterbox available to test things on, only
> buildds which don't have open access.
eberlin.d.o should work.
Chris
On Fri, 15 Nov 2024 at 10:42:06 +, Matthew Vernon wrote:
> Control: tags -1 help
(Probably best to keep the Cc to debian-m...@lists.debian.org when
asking for help with a mips*-specific bug!)
> Hm. AFAICT there is no mips64el porterbox available to test things on, only
> buildds which don't h
Source: pcre2
Version: 10.44-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-...@lists.debian.org, debian-h...@lists.debian.org,
debian-powe...@lists.debian.org, b...@debian.org
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Us
Control: tags -1 help
On 15/11/2024 10:24, Simon McVittie wrote:
This looks like it might be a problem with some toolchain component
(but I don't know which one), so please reassign and set "affects" on
src:pcre2 as appropriate.
Hm. AFAICT there is no mips64el porterbox available to test thin
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 help
Bug #1087562 [src:pcre2] pcre2: FTBFS on mips64el: ld: unrecognised emulation
mode: elf
Added tag(s) help.
--
1087562: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1087562
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Source: pcre2
Version: 10.44-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-...@lists.debian.org
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: armel
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=pcre2&arch=armel&ve
Source: pcre2
Version: 10.44-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-m...@lists.debian.org
User: debian-m...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: mips64el
This looks like it might be a problem with some toolchain com
Your message dated Fri, 15 Nov 2024 10:05:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1081470: fixed in python-msgspec 0.18.6+1-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #1081470,
regarding FTBFS with Python 3.13
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Source: tiledarray
Version: 1.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, tiledarray failed to build from source
on both amd64 and arm64 with the following error message:
-- Performing Test EIGEN3_COMPILES - Success
CMake Error at /
Source: seqkit
Version: 2.8.2+ds-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, seqkit failed to build from
source on both amd64 and arm64 with the following error message:
github.com/shenwei356/seqkit/seqkit/cmd
# github.com/shenwei356/se
Your message dated Fri, 15 Nov 2024 08:47:07 +
with message-id <20241115084707.yzidv33sassio...@satie.tumbleweed.org.za>
and subject line Re: Bug#1082325: transforms3d FTBFS with Python 3.13
has caused the Debian Bug report #1082325,
regarding transforms3d FTBFS with Python 3.13
to be marked as
Source: singularity-container
Version: 4.1.5+ds3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, singularity-container failed to
build from source on both amd64 and arm64 with the following error
message:
github.com/sylabs/singularity/vendo
Your message dated Fri, 15 Nov 2024 08:38:56 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1082281: fixed in python-webob 1:1.8.7-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1082281,
regarding python-webob FTBFS with Python 3.13
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Fri, 15 Nov 2024 08:37:58 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1085979: fixed in gvm-libs 22.14.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1085979,
regarding gvm-libs: FTBFS on 32 bit architectures
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 1086325 https://github.com/kvesteri/wtforms-alchemy/issues/165
Bug #1086325 [src:wtforms-alchemy] wtforms-alchemy: FTBFS: E AttributeError:
'NumberInput' object has no attribute 'validation_attrs'
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 1086744 https://github.com/processone/eimp/issues/19
Bug #1086744 {Done: Paul Gevers } [src:erlang-p1-eimp]
src:erlang-p1-eimp: fails to migrate to testing for too long
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://github.com/processone/eimp
Source: nthash
Version: 2.3.0+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: arm64
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, this package failed to build on
arm64. On amd64 it builds correctly.
Here is the error message:
[ 75%] Lin
Your message dated Fri, 15 Nov 2024 08:48:47 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1052877: fixed in redmine 5.1.3+ds-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1052877,
regarding redmine: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:20:
override_dh_auto_configure] Error 7
to be marked as done.
This means th
Your message dated Fri, 15 Nov 2024 08:48:47 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1040927: fixed in redmine 5.1.3+ds-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1040927,
regarding redmine: bashism in postinst script
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit
Hi Stefano,
I tried ten times but was not able to reproduce this with the 3.13
packages that are in unstable now. It also works on debusine:
https://debusine.debian.net/debusine/work-request/43081/
So my best guess is that it was a problem with the numpy version you
used?
Do you have any o
On Friday, November 15, 2024 9:03:35 AM CET Timo Röhling wrote:
> >It seems that `qt6-declarative-dev`'s `Qt6QmlTargets.cmake` has
> >a dependency on content of `qt6-declarative-private-dev`, so why
> >not express that dependency in the `qt6-declarative-dev` package?
Qt6QmlTargets.cmake creates tw
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1082281 [src:python-webob] python-webob FTBFS with Python 3.13
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1082281: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1082281
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1082281 in python-webob reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/python-webob/-/commit/38bac946f
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 qt6-declarative-dev
Bug #1087385 [cmake] cmake 3.31.0-1 breaks Qt6Qml builds
Bug reassigned from package 'cmake' to 'qt6-declarative-dev'.
No longer marked as found in versions cmake/3.31.0-1.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1087385 to th
Control: reassign -1 qt6-declarative-dev
Control: retitle -1 qt6-declarative-dev depends on qt6-declarative-private-dev
* Brad King [2024-11-14 10:21]:
On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 7:14 AM Sune Stolborg Vuorela wrote:
> * https://gitlab.kitware.com/cmake/cmake/-/issues/25728
I suggest we upload a c
97 matches
Mail list logo
