Processed: Bug#1073897 marked as pending in ocaml-magic

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1073897 [src:ocaml-magic] FTBFS with OCaml 5.2.0 (C stubs uses OCaml functions without caml_ prefix) Added tag(s) pending. -- 1073897: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1073897 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debia

Bug#1073895: marked as done (FTBFS with OCaml 5.2.0 (Uses .[] instead of Bytes.set))

Your message dated Fri, 09 Aug 2024 06:50:53 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1073895: fixed in ocaml-gnuplot 0.8.3-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #1073895, regarding FTBFS with OCaml 5.2.0 (Uses .[] instead of Bytes.set) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the prob

Bug#1073897: marked as pending in ocaml-magic

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1073897 in ocaml-magic reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/ocaml-team/ocaml-magic/-/commit/bacf9ee32e816767155fa

Bug#1073889: marked as done (FTBFS with OCaml 5.2.0 (Uses C functions without caml_ prefix))

Your message dated Fri, 09 Aug 2024 06:51:01 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1073889: fixed in ocamlagrep 1.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1073889, regarding FTBFS with OCaml 5.2.0 (Uses C functions without caml_ prefix) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the p

Bug#1078246: marked as done (calendar FTBFS: ERROR: File "calendarLib.cmt": not an implementation)

Your message dated Fri, 9 Aug 2024 08:34:31 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1078246: calendar FTBFS: ERROR: File "calendarLib.cmt": not an implementation has caused the Debian Bug report #1078246, regarding calendar FTBFS: ERROR: File "calendarLib.cmt": not an implementation to be

Bug#1077841: nvidia-graphics-drivers: dkms linux-image-6.10.3-amd64

The patch suggested by Gianluigi Tiesi in #1078124 resolves the dkms failure. The attached debdiff updates the packaging in unstable to include that patch. Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1diff -Nru nvidi

Bug#1073895: marked as pending in ocaml-gnuplot

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1073895 in ocaml-gnuplot reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/ocaml-team/ocaml-gnuplot/-/commit/3592a04e61b14fa54

Processed: Bug#1073895 marked as pending in ocaml-gnuplot

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1073895 [src:ocaml-gnuplot] FTBFS with OCaml 5.2.0 (Uses .[] instead of Bytes.set) Added tag(s) pending. -- 1073895: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1073895 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problem

Bug#1073899: marked as done (FTBFS with OCaml 5.2.0 (Configure script misdetects unix))

Your message dated Fri, 09 Aug 2024 06:21:50 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1073899: fixed in ocaml-obuild 0.1.11-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1073899, regarding FTBFS with OCaml 5.2.0 (Configure script misdetects unix) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the p

Processed: closing 1078246

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > close 1078246 Bug #1078246 [src:calendar] calendar FTBFS: ERROR: File "calendarLib.cmt": not an implementation Marked Bug as done > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1078246: https://bugs.debian.org/c

Bug#1073418: sasview/sasdata loader test failure

sasview 5.0.6-4 and sasdata 0.8.1-5 should fix these bugs for both testing and unstable and permit migration. -- Stuart Prescott http://www.nanonanonano.net/ stu...@nanonanonano.net Debian Developer http://www.debian.org/ stu...@debian.org GPG fingerprint 90E2 D2C1 AD14 6A1B 7EBB 891

Processed: Bug#1073899 marked as pending in ocaml-obuild

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1073899 [src:ocaml-obuild] FTBFS with OCaml 5.2.0 (Configure script misdetects unix) Added tag(s) pending. -- 1073899: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1073899 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with probl

Bug#1073899: marked as pending in ocaml-obuild

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1073899 in ocaml-obuild reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/ocaml-team/ocaml-obuild/-/commit/842289c7ab25c4438ed

Bug#1078248: "sequoia-octopus: rnp_identifier_iterator_create: parameter "ctx" is null" with thunderbird 115.13.0-1

package: rust-sequoia-octopus-librnp severity: serious justification: prevent package from entering trixie forwarded: -1 https://gitlab.com/sequoia-pgp/sequoia-octopus-librnp/-/issues/110 thanks meta data says it all. -- cheers, Holger ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-bui

Bug#1075452: rplay: ftbfs with GCC-14

Hi. I've just noticed this bug (my scripting was broken). It's affecting one of my packages too. I'm not in a position to fix it right now but I iintend to look at it in a week or so. If the fix, is straightforard, I will NMU it. I hope that's OK with you. Thanks, Ian. -- Ian JacksonThe

Bug#1075632: vtwm: ftbfs with GCC-14

I've just noticed this bug (my scripting was broken). I'm not in a position to fix it before the autoremoval but I will fix it (and do something about #1075452) ) soon, probably in a week aor so. Thanks, Ian. -- Ian JacksonThese opinions are my own. Pronouns: they/he. If I emailed you f

Bug#1075602: unclutter: ftbfs with GCC-14

I've just noticed this bug (my scripting was broken). I'm not in a position to fix it before the autoremoval but I iintend to NMU it in a week or so. Thanks, Ian. -- Ian JacksonThese opinions are my own. Pronouns: they/he. If I emailed you from @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is a pri

Bug#1074723: marked as done (stdeb: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:15: py2dsc.1] Error 1)

Your message dated Fri, 09 Aug 2024 03:50:02 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1074723: fixed in stdeb 0.10.0-2.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1074723, regarding stdeb: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:15: py2dsc.1] Error 1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the p

Bug#1074723: stdeb: diff for NMU version 0.10.0-2.1

Sorry, the script didn't create the diff properly. Here's the real debdiff.diff -Nru stdeb-0.10.0/debian/changelog stdeb-0.10.0/debian/changelog --- stdeb-0.10.0/debian/changelog 2022-05-25 15:53:36.0 -0400 +++ stdeb-0.10.0/debian/changelog 2024-08-08 23:12:17.0 -0400 @@ -1,3 +1,11

Processed: stdeb: diff for NMU version 0.10.0-2.1

Processing control commands: > tags 1074723 + patch Bug #1074723 [src:stdeb] stdeb: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:15: py2dsc.1] Error 1 Added tag(s) patch. -- 1074723: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1074723 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with pro

Bug#1074723: stdeb: diff for NMU version 0.10.0-2.1

Control: tags 1074723 + patch Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for stdeb (versioned as 0.10.0-2.1). The diff is attached to this message. Regards. diff -Nru stdeb-0.10.0/debian/changelog stdeb-0.10.0/debian/changelog --- stdeb-0.10.0/debian/changelog 2022-05-25 15:53:36.0 -0400 ++

Bug#1074723: stdeb: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:15: py2dsc.1] Error 1

On Tue, 2 Jul 2024 15:35:11 +0200 Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > make[1]: Entering directory '/<>' > PYTHONPATH=/<> help2man -N --version-string=0.10.0 -o py2dsc.1 -n 'creates Debian source package from Python package' /<>/debian/python3-stdeb/usr/bin/py2dsc > help2man: can't get `--help' info from /

Bug#1075475: marked as done (ruby-rdiscount: ftbfs with GCC-14)

Your message dated Fri, 09 Aug 2024 02:47:47 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1075475: fixed in ruby-rdiscount 2.2.7.3-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1075475, regarding ruby-rdiscount: ftbfs with GCC-14 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#1073876: marked as done (FTBFS with OCaml 5.2.0 (Needs event.mli))

Your message dated Fri, 09 Aug 2024 02:41:47 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1073876: fixed in cothreads 0.10-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #1073876, regarding FTBFS with OCaml 5.2.0 (Needs event.mli) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Processed: Bug#1073876 marked as pending in cothreads

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1073876 [src:cothreads] FTBFS with OCaml 5.2.0 (Needs event.mli) Added tag(s) pending. -- 1073876: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1073876 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1073876: marked as pending in cothreads

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1073876 in cothreads reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/ocaml-team/cothreads/-/commit/23058fbbe0b13e9912c63a8ca

Bug#1073904: marked as done (FTBFS with OCaml 5.2.0 (Uses String.capitalize))

Your message dated Fri, 09 Aug 2024 01:50:38 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1073904: fixed in ocaml-tools 20120103-12 has caused the Debian Bug report #1073904, regarding FTBFS with OCaml 5.2.0 (Uses String.capitalize) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem h

Bug#1078222: marked as done (cudf FTBFS on armel/m68k/powerpc/sh4: undefined reference to `__atomic_*)

Your message dated Fri, 09 Aug 2024 01:49:09 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1078222: fixed in cudf 0.10-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #1078222, regarding cudf FTBFS on armel/m68k/powerpc/sh4: undefined reference to `__atomic_* to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#1078226: marked as done (ben no longer finds its templates after OCaml 5.2.0 binNMU)

Your message dated Fri, 09 Aug 2024 01:34:10 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1078226: fixed in ben 1.7 has caused the Debian Bug report #1078226, regarding ben no longer finds its templates after OCaml 5.2.0 binNMU to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has be

Bug#1075469: marked as done (ruby-ncurses: ftbfs with GCC-14)

Your message dated Fri, 09 Aug 2024 01:36:53 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1075469: fixed in ruby-ncurses 1.4.11-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1075469, regarding ruby-ncurses: ftbfs with GCC-14 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with

Bug#1073904: marked as pending in ocaml-tools

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1073904 in ocaml-tools reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/ocaml-team/ocaml-tools/-/commit/1117e37c4b00aa7407a65

Bug#1078222: marked as pending in cudf

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1078222 in cudf reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/ocaml-team/cudf/-/commit/017d3c42103b925ae596089d34300fc0e41

Processed: Bug#1073904 marked as pending in ocaml-tools

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1073904 [src:ocaml-tools] FTBFS with OCaml 5.2.0 (Uses String.capitalize) Added tag(s) pending. -- 1073904: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1073904 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Bug#1078222 marked as pending in cudf

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1078222 [src:cudf] cudf FTBFS on armel/m68k/powerpc/sh4: undefined reference to `__atomic_* Added tag(s) pending. -- 1078222: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1078222 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org wit

Processed: Bug#1078226 marked as pending in ben

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1078226 [ben] ben no longer finds its templates after OCaml 5.2.0 binNMU Added tag(s) pending. -- 1078226: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1078226 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1078226: marked as pending in ben

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1078226 in ben reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/ben/-/commit/50831a09a75f2a8710efc3fa4f167503dc8ac0f6

Bug#1077867: marked as done (etcd: autopkgtest issues: appears flaky and fails on amd64 since August 2023)

Your message dated Fri, 09 Aug 2024 00:49:59 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1077867: fixed in etcd 3.5.15-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #1077867, regarding etcd: autopkgtest issues: appears flaky and fails on amd64 since August 2023 to be marked as done. This means that you clai

Bug#1075197: marked as done (libprelude: ftbfs with GCC-14)

Your message dated Fri, 09 Aug 2024 00:35:00 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1075197: fixed in libprelude 5.2.0-5.6 has caused the Debian Bug report #1075197, regarding libprelude: ftbfs with GCC-14 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. I

Bug#1075197: libprelude: diff for NMU version 5.2.0-5.6

Dear maintainer, I've uploaded an NMU for libprelude (versioned as 5.2.0-5.6). The diff is attached to this message. Regards. -- .''`. https://info.comodo.priv.at -- Debian Developer https://www.debian.org : :' : OpenPGP fingerprint D1E1 316E 93A7 60A8 104D 85FA BB3A 6801 8649 AA06 `. `'

Bug#1075482: marked as done (ruby-unicode: ftbfs with GCC-14)

Your message dated Fri, 09 Aug 2024 00:07:35 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1075482: fixed in ruby-unicode 0.4.4.5-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1075482, regarding ruby-unicode: ftbfs with GCC-14 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit

Bug#1074939: marked as done (eperl: ftbfs with GCC-14)

Your message dated Fri, 09 Aug 2024 00:04:35 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1074939: fixed in eperl 2.2.14-24 has caused the Debian Bug report #1074939, regarding eperl: ftbfs with GCC-14 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#1075456: marked as done (ruby-cool.io: ftbfs with GCC-14)

Your message dated Thu, 08 Aug 2024 23:51:38 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1075456: fixed in ruby-cool.io 1.8.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1075456, regarding ruby-cool.io: ftbfs with GCC-14 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#1075146: marked as done (libauthen-sasl-xs-perl: ftbfs with GCC-14)

Your message dated Thu, 08 Aug 2024 23:49:26 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1075146: fixed in libauthen-sasl-xs-perl 1.00-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1075146, regarding libauthen-sasl-xs-perl: ftbfs with GCC-14 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem h

Bug#1032485: marked as done (ruby-fcgi: Incompatible version with ruby >3.0)

Your message dated Thu, 8 Aug 2024 20:42:14 -0300 with message-id <1cdbc618-1d10-4e3e-a54e-0ab1010a4...@debian.org> and subject line ruby-fcgi: Incompatible version with ruby >3.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #1032485, regarding ruby-fcgi: Incompatible version with ruby >3.0 to be marked as don

Bug#1075172: marked as done (libgraphics-libplot-perl: ftbfs with GCC-14)

Your message dated Thu, 08 Aug 2024 23:35:00 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1075172: fixed in libgraphics-libplot-perl 2.2.3-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1075172, regarding libgraphics-libplot-perl: ftbfs with GCC-14 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the prob

Bug#1077405: debian/upstream/signing-key.asc (was: Re: Bug #1077405: pysodium-0.7.18.tar.gz.asc missing?)

On Thu, Aug 08, 2024 at 07:24:06PM +0200, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote: > Hi again stef, > > On Thu, Aug 08, 2024 at 12:21:10PM +0200, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 08, 2024 at 12:06:44PM +0200, stef wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 08, 2024 at 07:08:13AM +0200, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote: > > >

Bug#1075172: marked as pending in libgraphics-libplot-perl

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1075172 in libgraphics-libplot-perl reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/perl-team/modules/packages/libgraphics-l

Processed: Bug#1075172 marked as pending in libgraphics-libplot-perl

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1075172 [src:libgraphics-libplot-perl] libgraphics-libplot-perl: ftbfs with GCC-14 Added tag(s) pending. -- 1075172: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1075172 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problem

Bug#1075454: marked as done (ruby-cbor: ftbfs with GCC-14)

Your message dated Thu, 8 Aug 2024 20:03:34 -0300 with message-id <31de9c6b-c514-40b1-9254-f16cdfc78...@debian.org> and subject line ruby-cbor: ftbfs with GCC-14 has caused the Debian Bug report #1075454, regarding ruby-cbor: ftbfs with GCC-14 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that t

Bug#1058844: marked as done (libinovasdk: use udev.pc to place udev rules)

Your message dated Thu, 08 Aug 2024 22:51:19 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1058844: fixed in libinovasdk 1.3.6-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #1058844, regarding libinovasdk: use udev.pc to place udev rules to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#1078246: calendar FTBFS: ERROR: File "calendarLib.cmt": not an implementation

Source: calendar Version: 3.0.0-4 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=calendar&ver=3.0.0-4%2Bb2 ... dh_auto_build -- @install @doc dune build -j 6 -p calendar \@install \@doc File "src/.calendarLib.objs/byte/_unknown_", line 1, characters 0-0: (cd _

Processed: affects 1076788

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > affects 1076788 + apt Bug #1076788 [adequate] adequate: Messes up the console apt was running from Bug #1077210 [adequate] adequate: Messes up the console apt was running from Ignoring request to set affects of bug 1076788 to the same value previo

Bug#1077899: marked as done (Please do not hardcode /usr/lib/ocaml)

Your message dated Thu, 08 Aug 2024 22:22:20 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1077899: fixed in libguestfs 1:1.52.2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1077899, regarding Please do not hardcode /usr/lib/ocaml to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been deal

Bug#1074911: marked as done (dillo: ftbfs with GCC-14)

Your message dated Thu, 08 Aug 2024 22:21:16 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1074911: fixed in dillo 3.0.5-7.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1074911, regarding dillo: ftbfs with GCC-14 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#1073656: marked as done (ksh93u+m: move aliased files from / to /usr (DEP17))

Your message dated Thu, 08 Aug 2024 22:21:57 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1073656: fixed in ksh93u+m 1.0.8-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1073656, regarding ksh93u+m: move aliased files from / to /usr (DEP17) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem ha

Bug#1073631: marked as done (boinc-client: move aliased files from / to /usr (DEP17))

Your message dated Thu, 08 Aug 2024 22:20:09 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1073631: fixed in boinc 8.0.2+dfsg-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1073631, regarding boinc-client: move aliased files from / to /usr (DEP17) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the proble

Processed: Re: Bug#1076788: adequate: Messes up the console apt was running from

Processing control commands: > forcemerge -1 1077210 Bug #1076788 [apt] apt-get install terminates console session, throws back to login screen Bug #1077210 [apt] apt stop working CTRL + C. Merged 1076788 1077210 > reassign -1 adequate Bug #1076788 [apt] apt-get install terminates console session

Bug#1078228: marked as done (1oom: FTBFS with GCC 14: error: passing argument 4 of 'menu_make_enum' from incompatible pointer type)

Your message dated Thu, 08 Aug 2024 21:50:00 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1078228: fixed in 1oom 1.10.3-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1078228, regarding 1oom: FTBFS with GCC 14: error: passing argument 4 of 'menu_make_enum' from incompatible pointer type to be marked as done.

Bug#1078245: cfengine3: FTBFS: 1 of 61 tests failed

Source: cfengine3 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs sid trixie Hi, cfengine3 currently fails to build from source on armel, armhf, riscv64 but has successfully built there before. https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=cfengine3&arch=armhf&ver=3.24.0-1&stamp=1722892279&raw=0 https://buildd.d

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1077537 patch Bug #1077537 [src:renpy] renpy FTBFS with ffmpeg 7 Added tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1077537: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1077537 Debian B

Bug#1077537: renpy FTBFS with ffmpeg 7

Here's a patch that (hopefully) fixes the deprecated APIs that were removed in FFmpeg 7.--- a/module/ffmedia.c +++ b/module/ffmedia.c @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include #include @@ -71,7 +72,11 @@ } +#if (LIBAVFORMAT_VERSION_MAJOR < 61) static int rwo

Processed: forcibly merging 1077779 1077856

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forcemerge 109 1077856 Bug #109 {Done: Reinhard Tartler } [src:google-guest-agent] google-guest-agent: FTBFS due to grpc transition Bug #109 {Done: Reinhard Tartler } [src:google-guest-agent] google-guest-agent: FTBFS due to grpc tra

Bug#1075705: marked as done (zfs-fuse: ftbfs with GCC-14)

Your message dated Thu, 08 Aug 2024 21:11:42 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1075705: fixed in zfs-fuse 0.7.0-28 has caused the Debian Bug report #1075705, regarding zfs-fuse: ftbfs with GCC-14 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If thi

Bug#1078244: Fwd: testing/sid: upgrade atspi to version 2.53.1-1 break orca on my system

Package: at-spi2-core Version: 2.53.1-1 Severity: grave - Forwarded message from Jérémy Prego - From: Jérémy Prego To: debian-accessibil...@lists.debian.org Subject: testing/sid: upgrade atspi to version 2.53.1-1 break orca on my system Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2024 15:32:13 +0200 Hello, I do

Bug#1075367: pcre3: ftbfs with GCC-14

I am uploading a NMU to DELAYED/10 in order to fix this. Please find the debdiff attached. pcre3_8.39-15.1.debdiff Description: Binary data

Bug#1073608: Bug#1074014: Bug#1073622: Bug#1073608: mksh, pax: no move to /usr going to happen, because:

Helmut Grohne dixit: >> Maybe the protective diversions also protect against this problem as well >> as the problem of moved files? I unfortunately failed to spot where the >> protective diversions were added in dh_movetouser (if that even is the >> right place to be looking), so I'm fairly sure

Bug#1078241: reiser4progs: FTBFS with GCC 14: error: initialization of ... from incompatible pointer type ...

Source: reiser4progs Version: 2.0.5-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Hi, reiser4progs/experimental started to FTBFS when GCC 14 was made the default compiler: libtool: compile: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -I../../

Processed: [bts-link] source package src:snapd

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package src:snapd > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/ > # > user debian-bts-l...@lists.debian.org Setti

Bug#1078240: py-libzfs: FTBFS with GCC 14: error: passing argument 2 of 'nvpair_value_string' from incompatible pointer type

Source: py-libzfs Version: 0.0+git20240117.143b624-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) py-libzfs FTBFS with GCC 14 as default compiler: ... : warning: statement with no effect [-Wunused-value] libzfs.c:5892:9: note: in exp

Processed: [bts-link] source package src:sqlalchemy

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package src:sqlalchemy > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/ > # > user debian-bts-l...@lists.debian.org

Processed: [bts-link] source package src:libre

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package src:libre > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/ > # > user debian-bts-l...@lists.debian.org Setti

Bug#1078236: gxr-openvr: FTBFS with GCC 14: error: initialization of ‘unsigned int’ from ‘void *’ makes integer from pointer without a cast

Source: gxr-openvr Version: 0.15.1-2.1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) gxr-openvr started to FTBFS when GCC 14 was made the default compiler: [68/88] cc -Iexamples/cube/gxr-cube.p -Iexamples/cube -I../examples/cube -Isrc

Bug#1073608: Bug#1074014: Bug#1073622: Bug#1073608: mksh, pax: no move to /usr going to happen, because:

Russ Allbery writes: > Sure, no problem. I'll file a bug against dash. #1007263 had already been filed and was on a very similar topic, so I have added some supplemental information to that bug report. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org)

Processed: libllvm-17-ocaml-dev: Missing OCaml Depends+Provides

Processing control commands: > clone -1 -2 -3 -4 Bug #1078232 [libllvm-17-ocaml-dev] libllvm-17-ocaml-dev: Missing OCaml Depends+Provides Bug 1078232 cloned as bugs 1078233-1078235 > reassign -2 libllvm-18-ocaml-dev Bug #1078233 [libllvm-17-ocaml-dev] libllvm-17-ocaml-dev: Missing OCaml Depends+

Bug#1078232: libllvm-17-ocaml-dev: Missing OCaml Depends+Provides

Package: libllvm-17-ocaml-dev Severity: serious Control: clone -1 -2 -3 -4 Control: reassign -2 libllvm-18-ocaml-dev Control: retitle -2 libllvm-18-ocaml-dev: Missing OCaml Depends+Provides Control: reassign -3 libllvm-19-ocaml-dev Control: retitle -3 libllvm-19-ocaml-dev: Missing OCaml Depends+Pro

Bug#1078231: kcemu: FTBFS with GCC 14: assignment to ... from incompatible pointer type ...

Source: kcemu Version: 0.5.2+dfsg-2 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../include/kc -I../../include -DDEBUG -DLINUX -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -g -O2 -Werror=implicit-function-declaratio

Bug#1074974: marked as done (fvwm: ftbfs with GCC-14)

Your message dated Thu, 08 Aug 2024 19:50:37 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1074974: fixed in fvwm 1:2.7.0-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1074974, regarding fvwm: ftbfs with GCC-14 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is no

Bug#1078230: starpu-contrib: FTBFS with GCC 14

Source: starpu-contrib Version: 1.4.5+dfsg-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source probably the same bug as in src:starpu Andreas

Bug#1078229: xserver-xorg-video-ivtvdev: FTBFS with GCC 14: error: assignment ... from incompatible pointer type ...

Source: xserver-xorg-video-ivtvdev Version: 1.1.2-2 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs sid trixie Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Hi, xserver-xorg-video-ivtvdev started to FTBFS when GCC 14 was made the default compiler: Making all in src make[3]: Enteri

Processed: [bts-link] source package src:nspr

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package src:nspr > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/ > # > user debian-bts-l...@lists.debian.org Settin

Bug#1078228: 1oom: FTBFS with GCC 14: error: passing argument 4 of 'menu_make_enum' from incompatible pointer type

Source: 1oom Version: 1.8.1-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Hi, 1oom started to FTBFS when GCC 14 was made the default compiler: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../../src -I../../../src/os/unix -I../../../src/game -I..

Bug#1073608: Bug#1074014: Bug#1073622: Bug#1073608: mksh, pax: no move to /usr going to happen, because:

Helmut Grohne writes: > Such concern is unwarranted. When dpkg unpacks a .deb, it unpacks all > the files with a .dpkg-tmp suffix appended. Hence, we also get a file > /usr/bin/mksh.dpkg-tmp. Once all of these are synced, it issues a > sequence of renames, including rename(/usr/bin/mksh.dpkg-tmp,

Bug#1077456: marked as done (python-itemadapter: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p 3.12 returned exit code 13)

Your message dated Thu, 08 Aug 2024 19:21:46 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1077456: fixed in python-itemadapter 0.9.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1077456, regarding python-itemadapter: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p 3.12 returne

Bug#1077457: marked as done (python-pytest-toolbox: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p 3.12 returned exit code 13)

Your message dated Thu, 08 Aug 2024 19:21:54 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1077457: fixed in python-pytest-toolbox 0.4-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #1077457, regarding python-pytest-toolbox: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p 3.12 ret

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1077202 patch Bug #1077202 [renpy] renpy: exception while trying to start renpy Added tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1077202: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1

Bug#1077202: renpy: exception while trying to start renpy

Here's a quick patch that will at least make renpy work again for me. I haven't done an exhaustive search for other relative .rpy->.py imports, only fixed those that produce errors. --- a/launcher/game/distribute.rpy +++ b/launcher/game/distribute.rpy @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ import store.updater a

Bug#1073608: Bug#1074014: Bug#1073622: Bug#1073608: mksh, pax: no move to /usr going to happen, because:

Hi Russ, On Thu, Aug 08, 2024 at 08:40:46AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > Just to be sure, though, I don't think this is the problem that Thorsten > was worried about. My understanding of the problem Thorsten was reporting > was slightly different: Thank you for bridging the gap in communication.

Bug#1078227: ivyplusplus depends on cruft libeclipse-jdt-compiler-apt-java

Package: ivyplusplus Version: 1.42-1 Severity: serious eclipse-jdt-core (4.29-1) unstable; urgency=medium * New upstream release - No longer build the removed bundles: - org.eclipse.jdt.compiler.apt ... -- Emmanuel Bourg Tue, 06 Aug 2024 14:33:16 +0200

Bug#1078226: ben no longer finds its templates after OCaml 5.2.0 binNMU

Package: ben Version: 1.6 Severity: serious $ ben tracker E: General error: ben-specific error: template debian not found $ Caused by: Files in second .deb but not in first - -rw-r--r-- root/root /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ocaml/5.2.0/ben/templates/debian/

Bug#1075306: marked as done (navit: ftbfs with GCC-14)

Your message dated Thu, 08 Aug 2024 17:51:35 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1075306: fixed in navit 0.5.6+dfsg.1-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1075306, regarding navit: ftbfs with GCC-14 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If thi

Bug#1073753: 6.3.0-1 pending upload

I have an updated version of cryptmount (packaged as 6.3.0-1) waiting for upload from http://rwpenney.uk/software#cryptmount . That is currently being reviewed by my sponsor, and should address both this bug, and #1072996

Processed: Re: src:autopkgtest: test_copy_timeout skipped because it's dependent on speed of testbed

Processing control commands: > severity -1 normal Bug #1068363 [src:autopkgtest] autopkgtest: test_copy_timeout fails on tmpfs Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious' > retitle -1 src:autopkgtest: test_copy_timeout skipped because it's dependent > on speed of testbed Bug #1068363 [src:autopkgtest

Bug#1068363: src:autopkgtest: test_copy_timeout skipped because it's dependent on speed of testbed

Control: severity -1 normal Control: retitle -1 src:autopkgtest: test_copy_timeout skipped because it's dependent on speed of testbed Control: tags -1 - pending On Thu, 04 Apr 2024 at 10:08:29 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > I looked at the results of the autopkgtest of your package. I noticed that >

Bug#1078218: marked as done (ocaml-extunix FTBFS on 32-bit with gcc 14)

Your message dated Thu, 08 Aug 2024 17:36:07 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1078218: fixed in ocaml-extunix 0.4.1-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #1078218, regarding ocaml-extunix FTBFS on 32-bit with gcc 14 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#1077405: debian/upstream/signing-key.asc (was: Re: Bug #1077405: pysodium-0.7.18.tar.gz.asc missing?)

Hi again stef, On Thu, Aug 08, 2024 at 12:21:10PM +0200, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote: > On Thu, Aug 08, 2024 at 12:06:44PM +0200, stef wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 08, 2024 at 07:08:13AM +0200, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote: > > > > > > I just found out https://pypi.org/project/pysodium/#files lacks a > > >

Bug#1078218: marked as pending in ocaml-extunix

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1078218 in ocaml-extunix reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/ocaml-team/ocaml-extunix/-/commit/01eea181f796ad2b6

Processed: Bug#1078218 marked as pending in ocaml-extunix

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1078218 [src:ocaml-extunix] ocaml-extunix FTBFS on 32-bit with gcc 14 Added tag(s) pending. -- 1078218: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1078218 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1075185: marked as done (libmemcached-libmemcached-perl: ftbfs with GCC-14)

Your message dated Thu, 08 Aug 2024 16:49:17 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1075185: fixed in libmemcached-libmemcached-perl 1.001801+dfsg-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #1075185, regarding libmemcached-libmemcached-perl: ftbfs with GCC-14 to be marked as done. This means that yo

Bug#1075039: gramophone2: ftbfs with GCC-14

Hi all, I fixed this bug. And I plan to NMU after ten days. The attachment is debdiff. If there's no one stop me to NMU I'll upload it after ten days to DELAY/10 queue. Yours, Paul diff -Nru gramophone2-0.8.13a/debian/changelog gramophone2-0.8.13a/debian/changelog --- gramophone2-0.8.13a/debia

Bug#1073608: Bug#1074014: Bug#1073608: Bug#1074014: Bug#1073622: Bug#1073608: mksh, pax: no move to /usr going to happen, because:

Thorsten Glaser writes: > There is absolutely no reason to force files to move, given they are now > aliased already *anyway*. I think this is the relevant Policy point. I pretty strongly disagree with this, and I think we also have a consensus on the Policy list that, no, we need to force all

  1   2   >