Bug#1076968: marked as done (halide: FTBFS: 31 - mullapudi2016_reorder (Failed))

2024-07-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Jul 2024 06:50:17 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1076968: fixed in halide 18.0.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1076968, regarding halide: FTBFS: 31 - mullapudi2016_reorder (Failed) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has be

Bug#1077153: ampliconnoise FTBFS with gcc 14

2024-07-25 Thread Adrian Bunk
Source: ampliconnoise Version: 1.29-11 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=ampliconnoise&ver=1.29-11%2Bb1 ... FCluster.c:223:1: error: return type defaults to ‘int’ [-Wimplicit-int] 223 | UpdateMinCacheForRow(struct t_Min* asMin,int i,float** aafDistMatri

Bug#1077130: marked as done (tuareg-mode: needs rebuild against dh-elpa >=2.1.5)

2024-07-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Jul 2024 06:24:25 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1077130: fixed in tuareg-mode 1:3.0.1-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1077130, regarding tuareg-mode: needs rebuild against dh-elpa >=2.1.5 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Processed: tagging 1074836

2024-07-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1074836 + pending Bug #1074836 [src:backuppc] backuppc: ftbfs with GCC-14 Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1074836: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=10748

Processed: Bug#1074874 marked as pending in ceph

2024-07-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1074874 [src:ceph] ceph: ftbfs with GCC-14 Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1074874 to the same tags previously set -- 1074874: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1074874 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.

Processed: Bug#1077037 marked as pending in pbuilder

2024-07-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1077037 [pbuilder] pbuilder: missing dependency on non-essential package mount Added tag(s) pending. -- 1077037: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1077037 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1075595: marked as done (udns: ftbfs with GCC-14)

2024-07-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Jul 2024 06:02:05 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1075595: fixed in udns 0.6-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1075595, regarding udns: ftbfs with GCC-14 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not th

Bug#1077037: marked as pending in pbuilder

2024-07-25 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1077037 in pbuilder reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/pbuilder-team/pbuilder/-/commit/b7aa546198a65a528c8470cb

Bug#1074874: marked as pending in ceph

2024-07-25 Thread Daniel Baumann
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1074874 in ceph reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/ceph-team/ceph/-/commit/6647b96bca5ee2254590f3ce6be6cf2c2c46

Processed: Bug#1077130 marked as pending in tuareg-mode

2024-07-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1077130 [src:tuareg-mode] tuareg-mode: needs rebuild against dh-elpa >=2.1.5 Added tag(s) pending. -- 1077130: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1077130 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1077130: marked as pending in tuareg-mode

2024-07-25 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1077130 in tuareg-mode reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/ocaml-team/tuareg-mode/-/commit/6b950753773aa8226848f

Bug#1075126: marked as done (lablgtk3: ftbfs with GCC-14)

2024-07-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Jul 2024 07:47:43 +0200 with message-id <454e0ccf-ccc2-4837-bbf6-4f80bbbae...@debian.org> and subject line Fixed in 3.1.5-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1075126, regarding lablgtk3: ftbfs with GCC-14 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem h

Bug#1075593: marked as done (u-boot: ftbfs with GCC-14)

2024-07-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 25 Jul 2024 22:36:02 -0700 with message-id <87r0bgvhod.fsf@wireframe> and subject line Re: Bug#1075593: u-boot: ftbfs with GCC-14 has caused the Debian Bug report #1075593, regarding u-boot: ftbfs with GCC-14 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Processed: bts

2024-07-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 1074874 + pending Bug #1074874 [src:ceph] ceph: ftbfs with GCC-14 Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1074874: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1074874 Debian

Bug#1074874: bts

2024-07-25 Thread Daniel Baumann
tag 1074874 + pending thanks I've cherry-picked the necessary upstream commits on top of 18.2.4, will finish running tests before uploading later on.. Regards, Daniel

Bug#1077116: marked as done (protobuf: needs rebuild against dh-elpa >=2.1.5)

2024-07-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Jul 2024 05:20:33 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1077116: fixed in protobuf 3.21.12-9 has caused the Debian Bug report #1077116, regarding protobuf: needs rebuild against dh-elpa >=2.1.5 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has be

Processed: trafficserver: CVE-2023-38522 CVE-2024-35161 CVE-2024-35296

2024-07-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > found -1 9.2.4+ds-0+deb12u1 Bug #1077141 [src:trafficserver] trafficserver: CVE-2023-38522 CVE-2024-35161 CVE-2024-35296 Marked as found in versions trafficserver/9.2.4+ds-0+deb12u1. > found -1 8.1.10+ds-1~deb11u1 Bug #1077141 [src:trafficserver] trafficserver: CVE-

Bug#1077141: trafficserver: CVE-2023-38522 CVE-2024-35161 CVE-2024-35296

2024-07-25 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Source: trafficserver Version: 9.2.4+ds-2 Severity: grave Tags: security upstream Justification: user security hole X-Debbugs-Cc: car...@debian.org, Debian Security Team Control: found -1 9.2.4+ds-0+deb12u1 Control: found -1 8.1.10+ds-1~deb11u1 Hi, The following vulnerabilities were published fo

Bug#1077127: marked as done (poke: needs rebuild against dh-elpa >=2.1.5)

2024-07-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Jul 2024 05:20:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1077127: fixed in poke 4.2+dfsg-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1077127, regarding poke: needs rebuild against dh-elpa >=2.1.5 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been deal

Processed: limit source to php-ml-iri, tagging 1071681

2024-07-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > limit source php-ml-iri Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing at least one of 'php-ml-iri' Limit currently set to 'source':'php-ml-iri' > tags 1071681 + pending Bug #1071681 [php-ml-iri] php-ml-iri: depends on obsolete pcre3 library Add

Processed: Re: Bug#1077111: inform-mode: needs rebuild against dh-elpa >=2.1.5

2024-07-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + pending Bug #1077111 [src:inform-mode] inform-mode: needs rebuild against dh-elpa >=2.1.5 Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1077111 to the same tags previously set > fixed -1 inform-mode/1.6.2-4 Bug #1077111 [src:inform-mode] inform-mode: needs rebuil

Bug#1075568: marked as done (tf5: ftbfs with GCC-14)

2024-07-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Jul 2024 04:43:21 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1075568: fixed in tf5 5.0beta8-14 has caused the Debian Bug report #1075568, regarding tf5: ftbfs with GCC-14 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is no

Processed: Re: Bug#1077111: inform-mode: needs rebuild against dh-elpa >=2.1.5

2024-07-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + pending Bug #1077111 [src:inform-mode] inform-mode: needs rebuild against dh-elpa >=2.1.5 Added tag(s) pending. > fixed -1 inform-mode/1.6.2-4 Bug #1077111 [src:inform-mode] inform-mode: needs rebuild against dh-elpa >=2.1.5 The source inform-mode and ver

Bug#1077111: inform-mode: needs rebuild against dh-elpa >=2.1.5

2024-07-25 Thread Ben Finney
Control: tags -1 + pending Control: fixed -1 inform-mode/1.6.2-4 On 26-Jul-2024, spwhit...@spwhitton.name wrote: > This package needs a no-change upload to rebuild it against dh-elpa > >=2.1.5. This is because binNMUs cannot be used to rebuild arch:all > packages. I have created a new release o

Bug#1077132: yatex: needs rebuild against dh-elpa >=2.1.5

2024-07-25 Thread spwhitton
Source: yatex Severity: serious Tags: patch User: debian-emac...@lists.debian.org Usertags: dh-elpa-2.1.5-rebuilds Dear maintainer, This package needs a no-change upload to rebuild it against dh-elpa >=2.1.5. This is because binNMUs cannot be used to rebuild arch:all packages. The update is nee

Bug#1077130: tuareg-mode: needs rebuild against dh-elpa >=2.1.5

2024-07-25 Thread spwhitton
Source: tuareg-mode Severity: serious Tags: patch User: debian-emac...@lists.debian.org Usertags: dh-elpa-2.1.5-rebuilds Dear maintainer, This package needs a no-change upload to rebuild it against dh-elpa >=2.1.5. This is because binNMUs cannot be used to rebuild arch:all packages. The update

Bug#1077131: xcscope-el: needs rebuild against dh-elpa >=2.1.5

2024-07-25 Thread spwhitton
Source: xcscope-el Severity: serious Tags: patch User: debian-emac...@lists.debian.org Usertags: dh-elpa-2.1.5-rebuilds Dear maintainer, This package needs a no-change upload to rebuild it against dh-elpa >=2.1.5. This is because binNMUs cannot be used to rebuild arch:all packages. The update i

Bug#1077129: verbiste: needs rebuild against dh-elpa >=2.1.5

2024-07-25 Thread spwhitton
Source: verbiste Severity: serious Tags: patch User: debian-emac...@lists.debian.org Usertags: dh-elpa-2.1.5-rebuilds Dear maintainer, This package needs a no-change upload to rebuild it against dh-elpa >=2.1.5. This is because binNMUs cannot be used to rebuild arch:all packages. The update is

Bug#1077128: tdiary-contrib: needs rebuild against dh-elpa >=2.1.5

2024-07-25 Thread spwhitton
Source: tdiary-contrib Severity: serious Tags: patch User: debian-emac...@lists.debian.org Usertags: dh-elpa-2.1.5-rebuilds Dear maintainer, This package needs a no-change upload to rebuild it against dh-elpa >=2.1.5. This is because binNMUs cannot be used to rebuild arch:all packages. The upda

Bug#1077127: poke: needs rebuild against dh-elpa >=2.1.5

2024-07-25 Thread spwhitton
Source: poke Severity: serious Tags: patch User: debian-emac...@lists.debian.org Usertags: dh-elpa-2.1.5-rebuilds Dear maintainer, This package needs a no-change upload to rebuild it against dh-elpa >=2.1.5. This is because binNMUs cannot be used to rebuild arch:all packages. The update is need

Bug#1077125: tpp: needs rebuild against dh-elpa >=2.1.5

2024-07-25 Thread spwhitton
Source: tpp Severity: serious Tags: patch User: debian-emac...@lists.debian.org Usertags: dh-elpa-2.1.5-rebuilds Dear maintainer, This package needs a no-change upload to rebuild it against dh-elpa >=2.1.5. This is because binNMUs cannot be used to rebuild arch:all packages. The update is neede

Bug#1077126: proofgeneral: needs rebuild against dh-elpa >=2.1.5

2024-07-25 Thread spwhitton
Source: proofgeneral Severity: serious Tags: patch User: debian-emac...@lists.debian.org Usertags: dh-elpa-2.1.5-rebuilds Dear maintainer, This package needs a no-change upload to rebuild it against dh-elpa >=2.1.5. This is because binNMUs cannot be used to rebuild arch:all packages. The update

Bug#1077123: srv-el: needs rebuild against dh-elpa >=2.1.5

2024-07-25 Thread spwhitton
Source: srv-el Severity: serious Tags: patch User: debian-emac...@lists.debian.org Usertags: dh-elpa-2.1.5-rebuilds Dear maintainer, This package needs a no-change upload to rebuild it against dh-elpa >=2.1.5. This is because binNMUs cannot be used to rebuild arch:all packages. The update is ne

Bug#1077124: rabbit: needs rebuild against dh-elpa >=2.1.5

2024-07-25 Thread spwhitton
Source: rabbit Severity: serious Tags: patch User: debian-emac...@lists.debian.org Usertags: dh-elpa-2.1.5-rebuilds Dear maintainer, This package needs a no-change upload to rebuild it against dh-elpa >=2.1.5. This is because binNMUs cannot be used to rebuild arch:all packages. The update is ne

Bug#1077122: silversearcher-ag-el: needs rebuild against dh-elpa >=2.1.5

2024-07-25 Thread spwhitton
Source: silversearcher-ag-el Severity: serious Tags: patch User: debian-emac...@lists.debian.org Usertags: dh-elpa-2.1.5-rebuilds Dear maintainer, This package needs a no-change upload to rebuild it against dh-elpa >=2.1.5. This is because binNMUs cannot be used to rebuild arch:all packages. Th

Bug#1077121: scheme48: needs rebuild against dh-elpa >=2.1.5

2024-07-25 Thread spwhitton
Source: scheme48 Severity: serious Tags: patch User: debian-emac...@lists.debian.org Usertags: dh-elpa-2.1.5-rebuilds Dear maintainer, This package needs a no-change upload to rebuild it against dh-elpa >=2.1.5. This is because binNMUs cannot be used to rebuild arch:all packages. The update is

Bug#1077120: mpqc: needs rebuild against dh-elpa >=2.1.5

2024-07-25 Thread spwhitton
Source: mpqc Severity: serious Tags: patch User: debian-emac...@lists.debian.org Usertags: dh-elpa-2.1.5-rebuilds Dear maintainer, This package needs a no-change upload to rebuild it against dh-elpa >=2.1.5. This is because binNMUs cannot be used to rebuild arch:all packages. The update is need

Bug#1077118: password-store: needs rebuild against dh-elpa >=2.1.5

2024-07-25 Thread spwhitton
Source: password-store Severity: serious Tags: patch User: debian-emac...@lists.debian.org Usertags: dh-elpa-2.1.5-rebuilds Dear maintainer, This package needs a no-change upload to rebuild it against dh-elpa >=2.1.5. This is because binNMUs cannot be used to rebuild arch:all packages. The upda

Bug#1077119: rail: needs rebuild against dh-elpa >=2.1.5

2024-07-25 Thread spwhitton
Source: rail Severity: serious Tags: patch User: debian-emac...@lists.debian.org Usertags: dh-elpa-2.1.5-rebuilds Dear maintainer, This package needs a no-change upload to rebuild it against dh-elpa >=2.1.5. This is because binNMUs cannot be used to rebuild arch:all packages. The update is need

Bug#1077117: slime: needs rebuild against dh-elpa >=2.1.5

2024-07-25 Thread spwhitton
Source: slime Severity: serious Tags: patch User: debian-emac...@lists.debian.org Usertags: dh-elpa-2.1.5-rebuilds Dear maintainer, This package needs a no-change upload to rebuild it against dh-elpa >=2.1.5. This is because binNMUs cannot be used to rebuild arch:all packages. The update is nee

Bug#1077116: protobuf: needs rebuild against dh-elpa >=2.1.5

2024-07-25 Thread spwhitton
Source: protobuf Severity: serious Tags: patch User: debian-emac...@lists.debian.org Usertags: dh-elpa-2.1.5-rebuilds Dear maintainer, This package needs a no-change upload to rebuild it against dh-elpa >=2.1.5. This is because binNMUs cannot be used to rebuild arch:all packages. The update is

Bug#1077115: lbdb: needs rebuild against dh-elpa >=2.1.5

2024-07-25 Thread spwhitton
Source: lbdb Severity: serious Tags: patch User: debian-emac...@lists.debian.org Usertags: dh-elpa-2.1.5-rebuilds Dear maintainer, This package needs a no-change upload to rebuild it against dh-elpa >=2.1.5. This is because binNMUs cannot be used to rebuild arch:all packages. The update is need

Bug#1077114: kivy: needs rebuild against dh-elpa >=2.1.5

2024-07-25 Thread spwhitton
Source: kivy Severity: serious Tags: patch User: debian-emac...@lists.debian.org Usertags: dh-elpa-2.1.5-rebuilds Dear maintainer, This package needs a no-change upload to rebuild it against dh-elpa >=2.1.5. This is because binNMUs cannot be used to rebuild arch:all packages. The update is need

Bug#1077113: macaulay2: needs rebuild against dh-elpa >=2.1.5

2024-07-25 Thread spwhitton
Source: macaulay2 Severity: serious Tags: patch User: debian-emac...@lists.debian.org Usertags: dh-elpa-2.1.5-rebuilds Dear maintainer, This package needs a no-change upload to rebuild it against dh-elpa >=2.1.5. This is because binNMUs cannot be used to rebuild arch:all packages. The update is

Bug#1077108: howm: needs rebuild against dh-elpa >=2.1.5

2024-07-25 Thread spwhitton
Source: howm Severity: serious Tags: patch User: debian-emac...@lists.debian.org Usertags: dh-elpa-2.1.5-rebuilds Dear maintainer, This package needs a no-change upload to rebuild it against dh-elpa >=2.1.5. This is because binNMUs cannot be used to rebuild arch:all packages. The update is need

Bug#1077112: lintian: needs rebuild against dh-elpa >=2.1.5

2024-07-25 Thread spwhitton
Source: lintian Severity: serious Tags: patch User: debian-emac...@lists.debian.org Usertags: dh-elpa-2.1.5-rebuilds Dear maintainer, This package needs a no-change upload to rebuild it against dh-elpa >=2.1.5. This is because binNMUs cannot be used to rebuild arch:all packages. The update is n

Bug#1077111: inform-mode: needs rebuild against dh-elpa >=2.1.5

2024-07-25 Thread spwhitton
Source: inform-mode Severity: serious Tags: patch User: debian-emac...@lists.debian.org Usertags: dh-elpa-2.1.5-rebuilds Dear maintainer, This package needs a no-change upload to rebuild it against dh-elpa >=2.1.5. This is because binNMUs cannot be used to rebuild arch:all packages. The update

Bug#1077109: gramadoir: needs rebuild against dh-elpa >=2.1.5

2024-07-25 Thread spwhitton
Source: gramadoir Severity: serious Tags: patch User: debian-emac...@lists.debian.org Usertags: dh-elpa-2.1.5-rebuilds Dear maintainer, This package needs a no-change upload to rebuild it against dh-elpa >=2.1.5. This is because binNMUs cannot be used to rebuild arch:all packages. The update is

Bug#1077110: liquidsoap: needs rebuild against dh-elpa >=2.1.5

2024-07-25 Thread spwhitton
Source: liquidsoap Severity: serious Tags: patch User: debian-emac...@lists.debian.org Usertags: dh-elpa-2.1.5-rebuilds Dear maintainer, This package needs a no-change upload to rebuild it against dh-elpa >=2.1.5. This is because binNMUs cannot be used to rebuild arch:all packages. The update i

Bug#1077107: commit-patch: needs rebuild against dh-elpa >=2.1.5

2024-07-25 Thread spwhitton
Source: commit-patch Severity: serious Tags: patch User: debian-emac...@lists.debian.org Usertags: dh-elpa-2.1.5-rebuilds Dear maintainer, This package needs a no-change upload to rebuild it against dh-elpa >=2.1.5. This is because binNMUs cannot be used to rebuild arch:all packages. The update

Bug#1077106: goto-chg-el: needs rebuild against dh-elpa >=2.1.5

2024-07-25 Thread spwhitton
Source: goto-chg-el Severity: serious Tags: patch User: debian-emac...@lists.debian.org Usertags: dh-elpa-2.1.5-rebuilds Dear maintainer, This package needs a no-change upload to rebuild it against dh-elpa >=2.1.5. This is because binNMUs cannot be used to rebuild arch:all packages. The update

Bug#1077105: emacs-lintian: needs rebuild against dh-elpa >=2.1.5

2024-07-25 Thread spwhitton
Source: emacs-lintian Severity: serious Tags: patch User: debian-emac...@lists.debian.org Usertags: dh-elpa-2.1.5-rebuilds Dear maintainer, This package needs a no-change upload to rebuild it against dh-elpa >=2.1.5. This is because binNMUs cannot be used to rebuild arch:all packages. The updat

Bug#1077104: fricas: needs rebuild against dh-elpa >=2.1.5

2024-07-25 Thread spwhitton
Source: fricas Severity: serious Tags: patch User: debian-emac...@lists.debian.org Usertags: dh-elpa-2.1.5-rebuilds Dear maintainer, This package needs a no-change upload to rebuild it against dh-elpa >=2.1.5. This is because binNMUs cannot be used to rebuild arch:all packages. The update is ne

Bug#1077103: gcl27: needs rebuild against dh-elpa >=2.1.5

2024-07-25 Thread spwhitton
Source: gcl27 Severity: serious Tags: patch User: debian-emac...@lists.debian.org Usertags: dh-elpa-2.1.5-rebuilds Dear maintainer, This package needs a no-change upload to rebuild it against dh-elpa >=2.1.5. This is because binNMUs cannot be used to rebuild arch:all packages. The update is nee

Bug#1077102: gettext: needs rebuild against dh-elpa >=2.1.5

2024-07-25 Thread spwhitton
Source: gettext Severity: serious Tags: patch User: debian-emac...@lists.debian.org Usertags: dh-elpa-2.1.5-rebuilds Dear maintainer, This package needs a no-change upload to rebuild it against dh-elpa >=2.1.5. This is because binNMUs cannot be used to rebuild arch:all packages. The update is n

Bug#1077101: dynare: needs rebuild against dh-elpa >=2.1.5

2024-07-25 Thread spwhitton
Source: dynare Severity: serious Tags: patch User: debian-emac...@lists.debian.org Usertags: dh-elpa-2.1.5-rebuilds Dear maintainer, This package needs a no-change upload to rebuild it against dh-elpa >=2.1.5. This is because binNMUs cannot be used to rebuild arch:all packages. The update is ne

Bug#1077100: ferret-vis: needs rebuild against dh-elpa >=2.1.5

2024-07-25 Thread spwhitton
Source: ferret-vis Severity: serious Tags: patch User: debian-emac...@lists.debian.org Usertags: dh-elpa-2.1.5-rebuilds Dear maintainer, This package needs a no-change upload to rebuild it against dh-elpa >=2.1.5. This is because binNMUs cannot be used to rebuild arch:all packages. The update i

Bug#1077099: elpa-migemo: needs rebuild against dh-elpa >=2.1.5

2024-07-25 Thread spwhitton
Source: elpa-migemo Severity: serious Tags: patch User: debian-emac...@lists.debian.org Usertags: dh-elpa-2.1.5-rebuilds Dear maintainer, This package needs a no-change upload to rebuild it against dh-elpa >=2.1.5. This is because binNMUs cannot be used to rebuild arch:all packages. The update

Bug#1077098: ccrypt: needs rebuild against dh-elpa >=2.1.5

2024-07-25 Thread spwhitton
Source: ccrypt Severity: serious Tags: patch User: debian-emac...@lists.debian.org Usertags: dh-elpa-2.1.5-rebuilds Dear maintainer, This package needs a no-change upload to rebuild it against dh-elpa >=2.1.5. This is because binNMUs cannot be used to rebuild arch:all packages. The update is ne

Bug#1077097: clues-emacs: needs rebuild against dh-elpa >=2.1.5

2024-07-25 Thread spwhitton
Source: clues-emacs Severity: serious Tags: patch User: debian-emac...@lists.debian.org Usertags: dh-elpa-2.1.5-rebuilds Dear maintainer, This package needs a no-change upload to rebuild it against dh-elpa >=2.1.5. This is because binNMUs cannot be used to rebuild arch:all packages. The update

Bug#1077096: auto-complete-el: needs rebuild against dh-elpa >=2.1.5

2024-07-25 Thread spwhitton
Source: auto-complete-el Severity: serious Tags: patch User: debian-emac...@lists.debian.org Usertags: dh-elpa-2.1.5-rebuilds Dear maintainer, This package needs a no-change upload to rebuild it against dh-elpa >=2.1.5. This is because binNMUs cannot be used to rebuild arch:all packages. The up

Bug#1077095: agda: needs rebuild against dh-elpa >=2.1.5

2024-07-25 Thread spwhitton
Source: agda Severity: serious Tags: patch User: debian-emac...@lists.debian.org Usertags: dh-elpa-2.1.5-rebuilds Dear maintainer, This package needs a no-change upload to rebuild it against dh-elpa >=2.1.5. This is because binNMUs cannot be used to rebuild arch:all packages. The update is need

Bug#1077094: ats2-lang: needs rebuild against dh-elpa >=2.1.5

2024-07-25 Thread spwhitton
Source: ats2-lang Severity: serious Tags: patch User: debian-emac...@lists.debian.org Usertags: dh-elpa-2.1.5-rebuilds Dear maintainer, This package needs a no-change upload to rebuild it against dh-elpa >=2.1.5. This is because binNMUs cannot be used to rebuild arch:all packages. The update is

Bug#1077093: caml-mode: needs rebuild against dh-elpa >=2.1.5

2024-07-25 Thread spwhitton
Source: caml-mode Severity: serious Tags: patch User: debian-emac...@lists.debian.org Usertags: dh-elpa-2.1.5-rebuilds Dear maintainer, This package needs a no-change upload to rebuild it against dh-elpa >=2.1.5. This is because binNMUs cannot be used to rebuild arch:all packages. The update is

Bug#1077092: acl2: needs rebuild against dh-elpa >=2.1.5

2024-07-25 Thread spwhitton
Source: acl2 Severity: serious Tags: patch User: debian-emac...@lists.debian.org Usertags: dh-elpa-2.1.5-rebuilds Dear maintainer, This package needs a no-change upload to rebuild it against dh-elpa >=2.1.5. This is because binNMUs cannot be used to rebuild arch:all packages. The update is need

Bug#1077091: src:sosreport: d/copyright inaccurate

2024-07-25 Thread Tobias Frost
Source: sosreport Severity: serious Justification: Policy 4.5 (Found during reviewing RFS #1076347) On Thu, 25 Jul 2024 13:13:28 +0100 Arif Ali wrote: > I've delayed the copyright updates until we've discussed this upstream, so > no changes there for the time being. (It seems that part of the d

Bug#1075393: marked as done (pocl: ftbfs with GCC-14)

2024-07-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Jul 2024 03:29:56 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1075393: fixed in pocl 6.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1075393, regarding pocl: ftbfs with GCC-14 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not th

Processed: bug 1076927 is forwarded to https://github.com/sphinx-contrib/restbuilder/issues/34

2024-07-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 1076927 https://github.com/sphinx-contrib/restbuilder/issues/34 Bug #1076927 [src:sphinxcontrib-restbuilder] sphinxcontrib-restbuilder: FTBFS: sphinx error Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://github.com/sphinx-contrib/restbuilder/

Bug#1077057: marked as done (i2pd FTBFS with miniupnpc 2.2.8)

2024-07-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Jul 2024 03:17:36 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1077057: fixed in i2pd 2.53.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1077057, regarding i2pd FTBFS with miniupnpc 2.2.8 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If thi

Bug#1075497: marked as done (sdl-mixer1.2: ftbfs with GCC-14)

2024-07-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Jul 2024 00:43:18 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1075497: fixed in sdl-mixer1.2 1.2.12-19 has caused the Debian Bug report #1075497, regarding sdl-mixer1.2: ftbfs with GCC-14 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit

Bug#1075498: marked as done (sdl-image1.2: ftbfs with GCC-14)

2024-07-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Jul 2024 00:43:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1075498: fixed in sdl-image1.2 1.2.12-14 has caused the Debian Bug report #1075498, regarding sdl-image1.2: ftbfs with GCC-14 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit

Bug#1077062: marked as done (golang-github-grpc-ecosystem-grpc-gateway FTBFS on 32bit)

2024-07-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 25 Jul 2024 22:43:04 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1077062: fixed in golang-github-grpc-ecosystem-grpc-gateway 2.20.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1077062, regarding golang-github-grpc-ecosystem-grpc-gateway FTBFS on 32bit to be marked as done. This me

Bug#1077078: mutter FTBFS on armel/armhf/i386 with gcc 14

2024-07-25 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 12:35:57AM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: >... > This is caused by > debian/patches/workarounds/tests-Skip-thread-priority-test.patch Which does BTW look wrong. There is nothing architecture specific about scheduling and thread priorities here, and a failure with the interface

Bug#1077078: mutter FTBFS on armel/armhf/i386 with gcc 14

2024-07-25 Thread Adrian Bunk
Source: mutter Version: 46.3.1-2 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=mutter&ver=46.3.1-2%2Bb1 ... ../src/tests/native-thread.c: In function ‘assert_realtime’: ../src/tests/native-thread.c:1162:3: error: ‘return’ with no value, in function returning non-voi

Bug#1077062: golang-github-grpc-ecosystem-grpc-gateway FTBFS on 32bit

2024-07-25 Thread Mathias Gibbens
ACK, I noticed that this morning as well. FYI, we've started a grpc/protobuf transition for golang packages, so you may observe a higher occurrence of package build issues than normal while we work through things. Mathias signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#1075182: marked as done (libmath-gsl-perl: ftbfs with GCC-14)

2024-07-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 25 Jul 2024 21:04:37 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1075182: fixed in libmath-gsl-perl 0.45-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1075182, regarding libmath-gsl-perl: ftbfs with GCC-14 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been deal

Bug#1076470: marked as done (libmath-gsl-perl: Cannot be binNMUed for the forthcoming GSL transition)

2024-07-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 25 Jul 2024 21:04:37 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1076470: fixed in libmath-gsl-perl 0.45-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1076470, regarding libmath-gsl-perl: Cannot be binNMUed for the forthcoming GSL transition to be marked as done. This means that you

Processed: affects 1075496

2024-07-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > affects 1075496 src:jami Bug #1075496 [src:sdbus-cpp] sdbus-cpp: ftbfs with GCC-14 Added indication that 1075496 affects src:jami > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1075496: https://bugs.debian.org/cg

Processed: your mail

2024-07-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > fixed 1075054 gudhi/3.10.1+dfsg-1 Bug #1075054 {Done: Gard Spreemann } [src:gudhi] gudhi: ftbfs with GCC-14 Marked as fixed in versions gudhi/3.10.1+dfsg-1. > stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1075054:

Bug#1075182: marked as pending in libmath-gsl-perl

2024-07-25 Thread Étienne Mollier
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1075182 in libmath-gsl-perl reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/perl-team/modules/packages/libmath-gsl-perl/-/co

Processed: Bug#1075182 marked as pending in libmath-gsl-perl

2024-07-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1075182 [src:libmath-gsl-perl] libmath-gsl-perl: ftbfs with GCC-14 Added tag(s) pending. -- 1075182: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1075182 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: libmath-gsl-perl: ftbfs with GCC-14 forwarded upstream

2024-07-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 1075182 https://github.com/hakonhagland/perl-math-gsl/pull/36 Bug #1075182 [src:libmath-gsl-perl] libmath-gsl-perl: ftbfs with GCC-14 Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://github.com/hakonhagland/perl-math-gsl/pull/36'. > thank you S

Processed: your mail

2024-07-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1077057 patch Bug #1077057 [src:i2pd] i2pd FTBFS with miniupnpc 2.2.8 Added tag(s) patch. > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1077057: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1077057 Debian

Bug#1076313: marked as pending in scikit-build

2024-07-25 Thread Emmanuel Arias
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1076313 in scikit-build reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/scikit-build/-/commit/be8d5e718

Processed: tagging 1076313

2024-07-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1076313 + pending Bug #1076313 [src:scikit-build] scikit-build's autopkg tests fail with setuptools 70 Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1076313: https://bugs.debian.org/c

Processed: Bug#1076313 marked as pending in scikit-build

2024-07-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1076313 [src:scikit-build] scikit-build's autopkg tests fail with setuptools 70 Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1076313 to the same tags previously set -- 1076313: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1076313 Debian Bug Trac

Bug#1077057: i2pd FTBFS with miniupnpc 2.2.8

2024-07-25 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
The attached patch will fix the FTBFS. -- Regards Sudip Description: Fix FTBFS with miniupnpc-2.2.8-2 Bug-Debian: https://bugs.debian.org/1077057 Last-Update: 2024-07-25 --- --- i2pd-2.51.0.orig/daemon/UPnP.cpp +++ i2pd-2.51.0/daemon/UPnP.cpp @@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ namespace transport return;

Bug#1076313: scikit-build's autopkg tests fail with setuptools 70

2024-07-25 Thread Emmanuel Arias
Hi Vladimir, I was starting to look the issue when I looked your message come, thanks! I'll take a look in the patches. Thanks! -- cheers, Emmanuel Arias ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ eam...@debian.org ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP: 13796755BBC72BB8ABE2AEB5 FA9DEC5DE11C63F1 ⠈⠳⣄ sign

Bug#1077075: mutter: Monitors not detected on Wayland after upgrade on Debian 13/testing

2024-07-25 Thread Fabrice Quenneville
Package: mutter-common Version: 46.3.1-2 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system X-Debbugs-Cc: fabquennevi...@gmail.com Dear Maintainer, Today after the daily upgrades on Trixie/Testing I lost two of my monitors on Wayland (I get all 4 on xorg.). * What led up to the situation

Processed: found 1077073 in 2024.20240313.70630+ds-2

2024-07-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 1077073 2024.20240313.70630+ds-2 Bug #1077073 [src:texlive-bin] texlive-bin FTBFS on 32-bit with gcc 14 Marked as found in versions texlive-bin/2024.20240313.70630+ds-2. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assis

Bug#1077073: texlive-bin FTBFS on 32-bit with gcc 14

2024-07-25 Thread Adrian Bunk
Source: texlive-bin Version: 2024.20240313.70630+ds-3 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=texlive-bin&ver=2024.20240313.70630%2Bds-3 ... pdftexini.c: In function ‘loadfmtfile’: pdftexini.c:4016:25: error: assignment to ‘boolean *’ {aka ‘int *’} from incomp

Bug#1077072: ruby-liquid-c FTBFS on 32-bit with gcc 14

2024-07-25 Thread Adrian Bunk
Source: ruby-liquid-c Version: 4.1.0-2 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=ruby-liquid-c&ver=4.1.0-3 ... vm.c: In function ‘vm_render_until_error’: vm.c:234:30: error: initialization of ‘const VALUE *’ {aka ‘const long unsigned int *’} from incompatible po

Processed: severity of 1076692 is serious

2024-07-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 1076692 serious Bug #1076692 [src:swift-im] swift-im: FTBFS with miniupnpc 2.2.8 Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1076692: https://bugs.debian.org

Processed: bug 1056100 is forwarded to https://github.com/boostorg/signals2/issues/70

2024-07-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 1056100 https://github.com/boostorg/signals2/issues/70 Bug #1056100 [src:boost1.83] boost1.83: Boost.Signals2 causes FTBFS Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://github.com/boostorg/signals2/issues/70'. > thanks Stopping processing he

Bug#1075175: marked as done (libkal: ftbfs with GCC-14)

2024-07-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 25 Jul 2024 17:50:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1075175: fixed in libkal 0.9.0-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #1075175, regarding libkal: ftbfs with GCC-14 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#1077063: marked as done (nvme-cli FTBFS on 32bit with 64bit time_t)

2024-07-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 25 Jul 2024 17:50:58 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1077063: fixed in nvme-cli 2.9.1-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1077063, regarding nvme-cli FTBFS on 32bit with 64bit time_t to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Processed: fixed 974207 in 1.4.1456-2

2024-07-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > fixed 974207 1.4.1456-2 Bug #974207 {Done: Boris Pek } [src:psi-plus] psi-plus: FTBFS with Qt 5.15 Marked as fixed in versions psi-plus/1.4.1456-2. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 974207: https://

Bug#1061216: openvdb: Please upgrade to llvm-toolchain-18

2024-07-25 Thread Fabio Pedretti
If llvm-15 is supported since 11.1.0, can you consider doing at least this step? llvm-15 is still in testing while llvm-14 no. This will hopefully restore openvdb (and blender) in testing (until llvm-15 also get out). Thanks.

Bug#1076729: marked as done (libwayland: breaks plasma desktop start after last upgrade to version 1.23.0-1)

2024-07-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 25 Jul 2024 17:19:18 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1076729: fixed in kwin 4:5.27.11-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1076729, regarding libwayland: breaks plasma desktop start after last upgrade to version 1.23.0-1 to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#1077063: nvme-cli FTBFS on 32bit with 64bit time_t

2024-07-25 Thread Adrian Bunk
Source: nvme-cli Version: 2.9.1-2 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs patch Forwarded: https://github.com/linux-nvme/nvme-cli/pull/2436 https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=nvme-cli&ver=2.9.1-2 ... FAILED: nvme.p/plugins_virtium_virtium-nvme.c.o cc -Invme.p -I. -I.. -Iccan -I../ccan -I/usr/in

  1   2   >