Hello Moritz,
On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 01:56:16PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> It would be great if you could prepare updates for bullseye-security and
> bookworm-security [1]. Please use 1.6-1+deb11u1 and 1.8-1+deb12u1 as the
> respective version numbers. security.debian.org also has autopkg
Julian,
On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 1:06 AM Jeremy Bícha wrote:
>
> Source: jpeg-xl
> Version: 0.9.2-6
> Severity: serious
> Tags: experimental
>
> jpeg-xl in experimental has autopkgtests that are failing on all
> architectures except for amd64.
>
> Specifically, the problem is that debian/libjxl-gd
Source: pytorch
Version: 2.1.2+dfsg-4
Severity: grave
Tags: security upstream
Justification: user security hole
X-Debbugs-Cc: car...@debian.org, Debian Security Team
Hi,
The following vulnerability was published for pytorch.
CVE-2024-5480[0]:
| A vulnerability in the PyTorch's torch.distributed
Your message dated Tue, 11 Jun 2024 05:04:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1072824: fixed in odin 2.0.5-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #1072824,
regarding odin FTBFS with VTK 9.3.0
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is no
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1072824 [src:odin] odin FTBFS with VTK 9.3.0
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1072824: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072824
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1072824 in odin reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/odin/-/commit/65d4b30820cd234ad26e1b753162352e38a2f
Jochen Sprickerhof writes:
> containerd uses sysctl during the build which fails as a normal user:
>
> === RUN TestLinuxSandboxContainerSpec
> sandbox_run_linux_test.go:241: TestCase "spec should reflect original
> config"
> sandbox_run_linux_test.go:71: Check PodSandbox annotations
Your message dated Mon, 10 Jun 2024 23:34:05 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1060474: fixed in pulseaudio 16.1+dfsg1-5.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1060474,
regarding pulseaudio: Please switch Build-Depends to systemd-dev
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
On Fri, Jun 07, 2024 at 05:23:32PM GMT, Santiago Vila wrote:
>
> [...]
> Install main build dependencies (apt-based resolver)
>
>
> Installing build dependencies
>
Your message dated Mon, 10 Jun 2024 23:20:16 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1063647: fixed in sysconfig 0.0.14+nmu1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1063647,
regarding sysconfig: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or
build-indep
to be marked as done.
This means tha
On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 6:24 PM Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> I've prepared an NMU for pulseaudio (versioned as 16.1+dfsg1-5.1) and
> uploaded it to DELAYED/7. Please feel free to tell me if I
> should delay it longer.
Feel free to upload now without delay.
Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha
Source: jpeg-xl
Version: 0.9.2-6
Severity: serious
Tags: experimental
jpeg-xl in experimental has autopkgtests that are failing on all
architectures except for amd64.
Specifically, the problem is that debian/libjxl-gdk-pixbuf.postinst
and debian/libjxl-gdk-pixbuf.postrm have hardcoded the amd64
a
Control: tags -1 + patch pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for apt-cacher-ng (versioned as 3.7.4-1.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
diff -Nru apt-cacher-ng-3.7.4/debian/changelog apt-cacher-ng-3.7.4/debian/changelog
-
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + patch pending
Bug #1071295 [src:apt-cacher-ng] apt-cacher-ng: FTBFS: src/meta.h:326:44:
error: operator '!' has no right operand
Added tag(s) patch and pending.
--
1071295: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1071295
Debian Bug Tracking Sys
Control: tags -1 + patch pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for pulseaudio (versioned as 16.1+dfsg1-5.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/7. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
diff -Nru pulseaudio-16.1+dfsg1/debian/changelog pulseaudio-16.1+dfsg1/debian/chan
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + patch pending
Bug #1060474 [src:pulseaudio] pulseaudio: Please switch Build-Depends to
systemd-dev
Added tag(s) patch and pending.
--
1060474: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1060474
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.
Your message dated Mon, 10 Jun 2024 23:57:00 +0200
with message-id <20240610215700.rvxouigrondw6...@piotr.cc>
and subject line fixed in zzzeeksphinx
has caused the Debian Bug report #1057576,
regarding mako: FTBFS: dh_sphinxdoc: error:
debian/python-mako-doc/usr/share/doc/python-mako-doc/html/sear
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 1063190
Bug #1063190 [src:owncloud-client] owncloud-client: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t
transition
Marked Bug as done
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1063190: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/
* Sam Hartman [240610 23:13]:
> control: tags -1 +help
>
>
> Chris> Filing with severity: serious as the buildd network has
> Chris> started switching to sbuild with unshare backend, and
> Chris> multiple people have reproduced this problem.
>
> I'm not running sbuild these days; I'
When building the rpm, I named the (rpm) package sherlock-project to have
parity with PyPI, due to the same conflicting package. The importable
module is still simply sherlock, however, which is _less than ideal_, and
should probably be addressed.
With this discussion now being had on the deb side
Your message dated Mon, 10 Jun 2024 21:21:11 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1072159: fixed in rust-pango-sys 0.19.5-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1072159,
regarding rust-pango-sys FTBFS with nocheck build profile: cp: cannot stat
'/usr/share/gir-1.0/Pango-1.0.gir': No such file
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 1071892 by 1060848
Bug #1071892 [src:rust-transmission-client] rust-transmission-client: FTBFS:
unsatisfiable build-dependencies
1071892 was not blocked by any bugs.
1071892 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 1071892: 10608
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 +help
Bug #1072952 [src:krb5] krb5: FTBFS: ../../src/tests/t_iprop.py - E: Build
killed with signal TERM after 60 minutes of inactivity
Added tag(s) help.
--
1072952: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072952
Debian Bug Tracking System
Cont
control: tags -1 +help
Chris> Filing with severity: serious as the buildd network has
Chris> started switching to sbuild with unshare backend, and
Chris> multiple people have reproduced this problem.
I'm not running sbuild these days; I'm mostly moving toward
containerized builds fo
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> clone 922396 -1
Bug #922396 [webext-noscript] webext-noscript: version out of date -- does not
work with current Firefox
Bug 922396 cloned as bug 1072956
> reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
Bug #1072956 [webext-noscript] webext-noscript: version out of
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> clone 971774 -1
Bug #971774 [tinyjsd] Doesn't support Thunderbird 68 / 78
Bug 971774 cloned as bug 1072955
> reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
Bug #1072955 [tinyjsd] Doesn't support Thunderbird 68 / 78
Bug reassigned from package 'tinyjsd' to 'ftp.debian
Source: krb5
Version: 1.20.1-6
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-CC: jspri...@debian.org
Filing with severity: serious as the buildd network has started
switching to sbuild with unshare backend, and multiple people have
reproduced this problem.
When building krb5 with sbuild, configured to
Hello Thomas,
On Mon, 10 Jun 2024 at 12:03, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>
> On 6/9/24 18:47, Samuel Henrique wrote:
> > Zigo,
> >> I just saw that sherlock (the social networks package) moved its python
> >> files to /usr/share, instead of /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages
> >> . This was
> >> the sensibl
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1056834 + upstream fixed-upstream
Bug #1056834 {Done: Nicholas D Steeves } [src:pyfuse3]
pyfuse3: ftbfs with cython 3.0.x
Added tag(s) upstream and fixed-upstream.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Hi,
being hit by this too, I’ve sumbitted an MR at [1].
You’ll also find in attachment the same fix on top of the version of dput
currently in the archive which is slightly different from the one in the salsa
repo.
You can put it in /usr/share/dput/dput/dput.py as a short-term workaround.
[1]
Your message dated Mon, 10 Jun 2024 15:50:36 -0400
with message-id <877cewtw4z@digitalmercury.freeddns.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#1056834: pyfuse3: ftbfs with cython 3.0.x
has caused the Debian Bug report #1056834,
regarding pyfuse3: ftbfs with cython 3.0.x
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Mon, 10 Jun 2024 19:35:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1061743: fixed in gramps 5.2.2+dfsg-0.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1061743,
regarding gramps ftbfs with Python 3.12 as default
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been d
Your message dated Mon, 10 Jun 2024 19:20:10 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1072945: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #969885,
regarding megadown: [python] is required and it's not installed
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the prob
Your message dated Mon, 10 Jun 2024 19:20:10 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1072945: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1007941,
regarding megadown: Should we remove this package?
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Mon, 10 Jun 2024 19:19:20 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1072932: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #991003,
regarding kpatch-dkms: fails to build module for Linux 4.19.0-17 or newer:
find_symbol is no longer exported by the kernel
to
Your message dated Mon, 10 Jun 2024 19:19:20 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1072932: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #983648,
regarding kpatch-dkms: fails to build module for Linux 5.10: uses unknown
struct stack_trace
to be marked as done.
This mean
Am 03.06.24 um 06:55 schrieb Ross Gammon:
I will try and take a look this week. But if I fail, either of you are
welcome to lose patience, merge it to master, and upload it for me. :-)
Hi Ross,
I've decided to lose patience. :-)
No, seriously, I've built Gramps locally and did some test runs
Your message dated Mon, 10 Jun 2024 19:19:20 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1072932: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1029189,
regarding kpatch: FTBFS with shellcheck 0.9.0
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been deal
Your message dated Mon, 10 Jun 2024 19:19:20 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1072932: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1027889,
regarding kpatch FTBFS: please switch to B-D: dh-sequence-dkms (or dh-dkms)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Source: dropbear 2024.85-2
Severity: serious
Justification: flaky debci is RC as per RT
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: flaky
Dear Maintainer(s),
The remote-unlocking autopkgtest is flaky, and often requires a retry
to pass, with no other changes. As per RT, this is RC. Example:
https
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 1039883 6.5.8-1
Bug #1039883 [src:linux] linux: ext4 corruption with symlinks
Marked as found in versions linux/6.5.8-1.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1039883: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-b
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # According to bisection in 5.10.94 5.15.17 5.16.3 and 5.17-rc1
> found 1039883 5.10.103-1
Bug #1039883 [src:linux] linux: ext4 corruption with symlinks
Marked as found in versions linux/5.10.103-1.
> found 1039883 5.16.3-1~exp1
Bug #1039883 [src:
Your message dated Mon, 10 Jun 2024 18:04:23 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1070327: fixed in audit 1:3.1.2-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1070327,
regarding libauparse0t64 fails piuparts: missing postrm for /usr-move mitigation
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim tha
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 1067699 serious
Bug #1067699 [libllvm18] libllvm18:i386 contains files, also in libllvm18:amd64
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1067699: https://
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> unblock 1071982 by 1052028
Bug #1071982 [src:jupyterhub] FTBFS: help2man fails
1071982 was blocked by: 1052028
1071982 was not blocking any bugs.
Removed blocking bug(s) of 1071982: 1052028
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please conta
Your message dated Mon, 10 Jun 2024 17:22:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1072941: fixed in mesa 24.1.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1072941,
regarding libgl1-mesa-dri: not multi-arch coinstallable
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been deal
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> fixed 1052200 4.3.4+dfsg1-1+deb12u1
Bug #1052200 {Done: Soren Stoutner } [electrum] electrum:
Lightning security bug in bookworm 4.3.4+dfsg1-1
Marked as fixed in versions electrum/4.3.4+dfsg1-1+deb12u1.
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please cont
Processing control commands:
> block -1 by 1067699
Bug #1072941 [libgl1-mesa-dri] libgl1-mesa-dri: not multi-arch coinstallable
1072941 was not blocked by any bugs.
1072941 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 1072941: 1067699
--
1072941: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.
Package: libgl1-mesa-dri
Version: 24.1.1-1
Severity: serious
Control: block -1 by 1067699
I just had to downgrade a bunch of packages from src:mesa to version
24.1.0-2, because the installation of libllvm18:i386 failed due to a
file conflict that has been present for a few months, see #1067699.
P
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 1039883 6.1.90-1
Bug #1039883 [src:linux] linux: ext4 corruption with symlinks
Marked as found in versions linux/6.1.90-1.
> On Thursday, 30 May 2024 14:39:16 CEST Emanuele Rocca wrote:
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> >
On Sun, 5 Nov 2023 16:12:41 + Hervé Werner
wrote:
> Hello
>
> I'm sorry for the delay.
>
> > Are you able to reliably preoeduce the issue and can bisect it to
> > the introducing commit?
> I faced this issue on real data but I struggled to find a reliable
> scenario to reproduce it. Here is
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> unblock 1052028 by 1071982
Bug #1052028 [src:pydantic] please update to pydantic 2.x
1052028 was not blocked by any bugs.
1052028 was blocking: 1061609 1071982 1072938
Removed blocking bug(s) of 1052028: 1071982
>
End of message, stopping processi
Processing control commands:
> block -1 by 1052028
Bug #1072938 [src:jupyterhub] jupyterhub: Unsatisfiable Build-Depends
python3-pydantic (>= 2)
1072938 was not blocked by any bugs.
1072938 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 1072938: 1052028
> unblock 107192 by 1052028
Failed to
Source: jupyterhub
Version: 5.0.0+ds1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Control: block -1 by 1052028
Control: unblock 107192 by 1052028
X-Debbugs-CC: lola...@debian.org
jupyterhub is unable to build from source because it has
Build-Depends: python3-pydantic >=2 but the latest version of
python3-pyda
Source: shadowsocks-libev
Version: 3.3.5+ds-10
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-CC: r...@debian.org rogershim...@gmail.com
Tags: sid
Hi,
Following the previous communication in March, I am considering to take action
and remove related packages in the ss-libev ecosystem. Package shadowsocks-libev
will
Source: simple-obfs
Version: 0.0.5-6
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-CC: r...@debian.org rogershim...@gmail.com
Tags: sid
Hi,
Following the previous communication in March, I am considering to take action
and remove related packages in the ss-libev ecosystem. The first targeted
package
would be simp
On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 11:59:34AM +0200, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 08:43:07AM -0700, Sam Hartman wrote:
> > > "Simon" == Simon McVittie writes:
[..]
> > Simon> However, even with both of those, if the krb5 test suite (or
> > Simon> protocol) is resol
Your message dated Mon, 10 Jun 2024 13:49:18 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1072597: fixed in node-chownr 2.0.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1072597,
regarding node-chownr: FTBFS: failing tests
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
Your message dated Mon, 10 Jun 2024 13:49:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1072604: fixed in node-stream-shift 1.0.3+~1.0.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1072604,
regarding node-stream-shift: FTBFS: failing tests
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Mon, 10 Jun 2024 17:32:34 +0400
with message-id
and subject line Fixed elsewhere
has caused the Debian Bug report #1068918,
regarding node-zx: FTBFS test suite failure
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notfound 1068918 node-zx/7.1.1+~cs6.7.23-2
Bug #1068918 [src:node-zx] node-zx: FTBFS test suite failure
No longer marked as found in versions node-zx/7.1.1+~cs6.7.23-2.
> notfound 1068918 node-zx/7.1.1+~cs6.7.23-3
Bug #1068918 [src:node-zx] node-z
Your message dated Mon, 10 Jun 2024 12:19:44 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1072603: fixed in node-read-package-json 5.0.2+~2.0.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1072603,
regarding node-read-package-json: FTBFS: failing tests
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
Your message dated Mon, 10 Jun 2024 12:19:37 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1072602: fixed in node-parse-json 5.2.0+~cs5.1.7-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1072602,
regarding node-parse-json: FTBFS: failing tests
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
Your message dated Mon, 10 Jun 2024 12:19:26 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1072598: fixed in node-decompress-response 6.0.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1072598,
regarding node-decompress-response: FTBFS: failing tests
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
Your message dated Mon, 10 Jun 2024 12:05:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1072600: fixed in node-json-parse-better-errors
1.0.2+~cs3.3.1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1072600,
regarding node-json-parse-better-errors: FTBFS: failing tests
to be marked as done.
This means that
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1072602 [src:node-parse-json] node-parse-json: FTBFS: failing tests
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1072602: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072602
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1072602 in node-parse-json reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-parse-json/-/commit/e81f2de8b3677dbe
Your message dated Mon, 10 Jun 2024 12:06:30 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1072306: fixed in r-cran-rcppparallel 5.1.7+dfsg-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #1072306,
regarding src:r-cran-rcppparallel: fails to migrate to testing for too long:
autopkgtest regression
to be marked as
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1072603 in node-read-package-json reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-read-package-json/-/commit/72
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1072603 [src:node-read-package-json] node-read-package-json: FTBFS:
failing tests
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1072603: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072603
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1072598 in node-decompress-response reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-decompress-response/-/commi
Hi Florian,
On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 08:41:27AM +0200, Florian Ernst wrote:
> Dear Security Team,
>
> On Sat, Jun 01, 2024 at 04:57:53PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > [...]
> > [0] https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2024-5564
> > https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1072598 [src:node-decompress-response] node-decompress-response: FTBFS:
failing tests
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1072598: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072598
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with prob
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1072600 in node-json-parse-better-errors reported by you has been fixed in
the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-json-parse-better-err
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1072600 [src:node-json-parse-better-errors] node-json-parse-better-errors:
FTBFS: failing tests
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1072600: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072600
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
Hello guys,
Thanks for the quick upload to sid guys ! Do you know what is the plan for
stable ? I see no activity to backport the fixes since the 2.45.1 release [0].
Thanks in advance
Tic
[0] :
https://repo.or.cz/git/debian.git/shortlog/8d1426afa25b0a66ed65d9b56b8c11df5e35d973
publickey - tic
Quoting Bastian Germann (2024-06-10 09:30:20)
> "Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues":
> > Do you have recommendations? I just need a drop-in replacement for markdown
> > into stdin, html on stdout. Nothing fancy.
> I would suggest discount or python3-markdown.
Brilliant! That tip was gold! All I did
On 6/9/24 18:47, Samuel Henrique wrote:
Zigo,
I just saw that sherlock (the social networks package) moved its python
files to /usr/share, instead of /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages
. This was
the sensible thing to do, as it doesn't really need to expose itself as
Python module.
Not really, tha
Your message dated Mon, 10 Jun 2024 10:49:14 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1072835: fixed in jpeg-xl 0.9.2-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #1072835,
regarding jpeg-xl: Failing autopkgtests
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If thi
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 08:43:07AM -0700, Sam Hartman wrote:
> > "Simon" == Simon McVittie writes:
[..]
> Simon> I am unsure whether there is consensus that "the result of
> Simon> gethostname() resolves to some address of the local machine"
> Simon> is also a reasonable thing
Processing control commands:
> tags 1052282 + patch
Bug #1052282 [src:mythtv-status] mythtv-status FTBFS with nocheck profile
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 1052282 + pending
Bug #1052282 [src:mythtv-status] mythtv-status FTBFS with nocheck profile
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1052282: https://bugs.debi
Control: tags 1052282 + patch
Control: tags 1052282 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for mythtv-status (versioned as 1.1.0-1.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
The patch also moves the systemd units into /usr.
Regards.
diff
On Fri, Jun 07, 2024 at 05:22:32PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
…
> t/po.t (Wstat: 65280 (exited 255) Tests: 38 Failed: 0)
> Non-zero exit status: 255
> Parse errors: No plan found in TAP output
Quoting Jeremy Bícha (2024-04-21 19:47:08)
> Simple patch attached.
I am not convinced that this issue should be ignored: Might be revealing
the upstream bugs recently tracked upstream, which might in Debian be
affected by relaxed dependencies e.g. on concurrent-queue.
- Jonas
--
* Jonas Smed
Source: libnss-pgsql
Version: 1.4.0debian-8
Severity: serious
libnss-pgsql's last upload was in 2014. This was a maintainer
upload. The last upstream release apparently happened in 2007. This
is about 17 years ago at the time of writing.
libnss-pgsql currently has an open FTBFS bug, pointing to o
Processing control commands:
> tags 1060467 + patch
Bug #1060467 [src:irker] irker: Please switch Build-Depends to systemd-dev
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 1060467 + pending
Bug #1060467 [src:irker] irker: Please switch Build-Depends to systemd-dev
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1060467: https://bugs.de
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 1060467 1072082
Bug #1060467 [src:irker] irker: Please switch Build-Depends to systemd-dev
Unable to merge bugs because:
package of #1072082 is 'irker' not 'src:irker'
Failed to forcibly merge 1060467: Did not alter merged bugs.
> than
Control: tags 1060467 + patch
Control: tags 1060467 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for irker (versioned as 2.23+dfsg-1.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
diff -Nru irker-2.23+dfsg/debian/changelog irker-2.23+dfsg/
Quoting Matthias Geiger (2024-05-26 11:20:09)
> On Sat, 25 May 2024 20:27:28 +0200 Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > Control: block -1 by 1071900
> >
> > Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2024-05-25 20:13:12)
> > > Ahh, you are talking about *async-channel* v2.3.0. Please consider in
> > > future to mentio
Source: libguestfs
Version: 1:1.52.0-6.1
Severity: serious
User: helm...@debian.org
Usertags: dep17
X-Debbugs-CC: helm...@debian.org
The debootstrap set was uploaded, including a new glibc and
base-files. The owner and exact management of /lib64 has changed.
libguestfs tests now fail, possibly in
Your message dated Mon, 10 Jun 2024 08:49:49 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1072798: fixed in nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla-470
470.256.02-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1072798,
regarding nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla-470: CVE-2024-0090, CVE-2024-0092
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Mon, 10 Jun 2024 08:36:03 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1064720: fixed in ruby-capybara 3.40.0+ds-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1064720,
regarding ruby-capybara: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby3.1" failed: NoMethodError:
to be marked as done.
This means that you cla
close 1071309 1.8.4-4
thanks
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 1071309 1.8.4-4
Bug #1071309 [src:gajim] gajim: FTBFS: test_get_first_grapheme fails
Marked as fixed in versions gajim/1.8.4-4.
Bug #1071309 [src:gajim] gajim: FTBFS: test_get_first_grapheme fails
Marked Bug as done
> thanks
Stopping process
Your message dated Mon, 10 Jun 2024 09:48:15 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Closing outdated bug
has caused the Debian Bug report #1071400,
regarding src:specutils: unsatisfied build dependency in testing:
python3-spectral-cube
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pro
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1064720 [src:ruby-capybara] ruby-capybara: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby3.1"
failed: NoMethodError:
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1064720 to the same tags previously set
--
1064720: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1064720
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1064720 in ruby-capybara reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-capybara/-/commit/dd48272e5a4623078b
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1064720 [src:ruby-capybara] ruby-capybara: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby3.1"
failed: NoMethodError:
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1064720 to the same tags previously set
--
1064720: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1064720
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1064720 in ruby-capybara reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-capybara/-/commit/2d5be37dfa3e7a2433
"Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues":
> Do you have recommendations? I just need a drop-in replacement for markdown
> into stdin, html on stdout. Nothing fancy.
I would suggest discount or python3-markdown.
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
