Bug#1061421: Fails to start after an upgrade

Jeremy Bícha writes: > Please verify whether wlgreet is working for you now. Was something changed somewhere? What, where? On trixie the issue reproduces exactly the same (even with sway upgraded to the binNMU'd version from sid). -- Arto Jantunen

Processed: closing 1069376, fixed 1069376 in 7:7.0-1

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > close 1069376 7:6.1.1-4 Bug #1069376 [src:ffmpeg] ffmpeg: FTBFS on arm64: src/libavcodec/vulkan_decode.h:31:5: error: unknown type name ‘VkVideoDecodeAV1ProfileInfoMESA’ Marked as fixed in versions ffmpeg/7:6.1.1-4. Bug #1069376 [src:ffmpeg] ffm

Bug#1069376: closing 1069376, fixed 1069376 in 7:7.0-1

close 1069376 7:6.1.1-4 fixed 1069376 7:7.0-1 thanks -- Sebastian Ramacher

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1068738 + patch Bug #1068738 [gnome-feeds] gfeeds: python failure at startup Added tag(s) patch. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1068738: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi

Bug#1068738: Patch

Hi, here's a patch that adds the newly required dependency on python3-lxml- html-clean. Kind regards, Bruno diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control index 11e717a..4c24515 100644 --- a/debian/control +++ b/debian/control @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ Build-Depends-Indep: appstream-util ,

Bug#1069586: Chromium native Wayland support broken

On Sun, Apr 21, 2024 at 1:27 AM Andres Salomon wrote: > > Control: tags -1 forwarded https://crbug.com/329678163 > Control: severity -1 serious > > On 4/20/24 23:13, Stephan Verbücheln wrote: > > Package: chromium > > Version: 124.0.6367.60-1~deb12u1 > > > > Since the last update, Chromium does wo

Processed: chromium

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 1069586 https://crbug.com/329678163 Bug #1069586 [chromium] Chromium native Wayland support broken Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://crbug.com/329678163'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistanc

Processed (with 1 error): Re: Bug#1069586: Chromium native Wayland support broken

Processing control commands: > tags -1 forwarded https://crbug.com/329678163 Unknown tag/s: forwarded, https://crbug.com/329678163. Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible help security upstream pending confirmed ipv6 lfs d-i l10n newcomer a11y ftbfs fixed-upstream fixed fixed-in-e

Bug#1066674: marked as done (gramophone2: FTBFS: GRAMophone.c:94:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘usageError’; did you mean ‘strerror’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration])

Your message dated Sun, 21 Apr 2024 03:34:03 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1066674: fixed in gramophone2 0.8.13a-3.3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1066674, regarding gramophone2: FTBFS: GRAMophone.c:94:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘usageError’; did you mean ‘strerro

Bug#1067316: gnucash-docs: FTBFS: Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: /usr/lib/jvm/java-17-openjdk-amd64/lib/libfontmanager.so: libharfbuzz.so.0: cannot open shared object file:

[Not reassigning yet to openjdk-17-jre-headless, as the change was done on purpose, but Cc-ing the OpenJDK Team.] Hi, Since no-one looked at this issue in a month and gnucash-docs has now been removed from testing... On 2024-03-20 22:03:18 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: [...] > > Exception in thre

Bug#1069535: [debian-mysql] Bug#1069535: galera-3: FTBFS on armel: dh_auto_test: error: cd obj-arm-linux-gnueabi && make -j1 test ARGS\+=--verbose ARGS\+=-j1 ARGS=--output-on-failure returned exit cod

Galera 25.3.37 was last release from upstream in 3.x series. I suspect the best resolution here is to wait a bit and then just file removal request for galera-3 in sid/trixie when we are confident there is no MariaDB 10.1/2/3 users out there anymore.

Bug#1064293: Bug#1068938: less: diff for NMU version 590-2.1

On 4/19/24 11:31, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: Control: tags 1064293 + patch Control: tags 1064293 + pending Control: tags 1068938 + patch Control: tags 1068938 + pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for less (versioned as 590-2.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell

Bug#1067547: marked as done (FTBFS: "vsnprintf is so broken we can't compensate. Sorry.")

Your message dated Sat, 20 Apr 2024 21:36:19 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1067547: fixed in wmweather+ 2.19~alpha+ds-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1067547, regarding FTBFS: "vsnprintf is so broken we can't compensate. Sorry." to be marked as done. This means that you claim t

Bug#1061546: marked as done (srcpd: installs file into aliased location)

Your message dated Sat, 20 Apr 2024 21:35:45 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1061546: fixed in srcpd 2.1.6-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1061546, regarding srcpd: installs file into aliased location to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w

Bug#1069398: marked as done (iraf-st4gem: FTBFS on arm64: tbtopn.c:91:(.text+0x20c): undefined reference to `isvote_')

.0+ds-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-arm64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on arm64. Relevant part (hopefully): > /usr/bin/ld: /<>/lib/l

Processed: Re: Bug#1069433: gtg-trace: FTBFS on armhf: tests fail

Processing control commands: > reassign -1 openmpi Bug #1069433 [src:gtg-trace] gtg-trace: FTBFS on armhf: tests fail Bug reassigned from package 'src:gtg-trace' to 'openmpi'. No longer marked as found in versions gtg-trace/0.2-3-2. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1069433 to the s

Bug#1069554: [Pkg-pascal-devel] Bug#1069554: winff: FTBFS on armel: build-dependency not installable: libreoffice-draw-nogui

Hi, On 20-04-2024 3:22 p.m., Lucas Nussbaum wrote: The following packages have unmet dependencies: sbuild-build-depends-main-dummy : Depends: libreoffice-draw-nogui but it is not installable E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. apt-get failed. I recall rene mentioni

Bug#1069433: gtg-trace: FTBFS on armhf: tests fail

Control: reassign -1 openmpi Control: affects -1 gtg-trace Hello, Lucas Nussbaum, le sam. 20 avril 2024 14:52:03 +0200, a ecrit: > > -- > > Sorry! You were supposed to get help about: > > pmix_init:startup:internal-failu

Processed: severity of 1010992 is serious

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # failed on buildds: > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=sstp-client&arch=amd64&ver=1.0.19-1%2Bb2&stamp=1713643682&raw=0 > severity 1010992 serious Bug #1010992 [src:sstp-client] sstp-client FTBFS on IPV6-only buildds Severity set to

Bug#1069551: numpy: FTBFS on armel: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test -i python{version} -p "3.12 3.11" returned exit code 13

Hi Lucas, * Lucas Nussbaum [2024-04-20 15:21]: Relevant part (hopefully): self = @pytest.mark.skipif(IS_WASM, reason="fp errors don't work in wasm") @pytest.mark.skipif(arm_softfloat, reason='platform/cpu issue with FPU (gh-413,-15562)') def test_invalid(

Bug#1069337: marked as done (Update Depends for the time64 library renames)

Your message dated Sat, 20 Apr 2024 19:53:55 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1069337: fixed in thunderbird 1:115.10.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1069337, regarding Update Depends for the time64 library renames to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem ha

Processed: Re: dnf: dnf aborts with ImportError: cannot import name '_module' from partially initialized module 'libdnf'

Processing control commands: > reassign -1 dh-python 6.20240401 Bug #1068255 [dnf] dnf: dnf aborts with ImportError: cannot import name '_module' from partially initialized module 'libdnf' Bug reassigned from package 'dnf' to 'dh-python'. No longer marked as found in versions dnf/4.14.0-4.1. Igno

Bug#1068255: dnf: dnf aborts with ImportError: cannot import name '_module' from partially initialized module 'libdnf'

Control: reassign -1 dh-python 6.20240401 Control: retitle -1 dh-python: dh_python3 loses cpython module name when renaming shared object On Tue, 2 Apr 2024 22:47:12 +0300 Michael Ivanov wrote: > Package: dnf > Version: 4.14.0-4.1 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > >

Processed: Bug#1063501: building less from source fails the island test

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 1063501 wishlist Bug #1063501 [src:less] building less from source fails the island test Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'serious' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1063501: https://bugs.deb

Bug#1056901: marked as done (network-manager-fortisslvpn: 1.4.0-1)

Your message dated Sat, 20 Apr 2024 18:22:54 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1056901: fixed in network-manager-fortisslvpn 1.4.0-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1056901, regarding network-manager-fortisslvpn: 1.4.0-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the proble

Bug#1069247: libconfig-model-dpkg-perl: test failures

On Sat, Apr 20, 2024 at 11:09:17AM +0200, Dominique Dumont wrote: > On Thursday, 18 April 2024 19:21:55 CEST you wrote: > > Source: libconfig-model-dpkg-perl > > Version: 3.004 > > Severity: serious > > Tags: ftbfs > > Justification: fails to build from source > > This really looks like a bug with

Bug#1056901: network-manager-fortisslvpn: 1.4.0-1

Done. I haev uploaded a NMU with the referenced patch.

Bug#1069480: bochs: FTBFS on armhf: build-dependency not installable: gcc-i686-linux-gnu

On 20/04/24 at 19:11 +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote: > gcc-i686-linux-gnu is in Build-Depends-Indep, it’s only used to build Arch: > all packages. Is there a requirement that these build on armhf? Given that > armhf doesn’t have gcc-i686-linux-gnu, I’m not sure how I would go about > fixing this, short

Bug#1069480: bochs: FTBFS on armhf: build-dependency not installable: gcc-i686-linux-gnu

Hi Lucas, On Sat, 20 Apr 2024 14:46:39 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Source: bochs > Version: 2.8+dfsg-1 > Severity: serious > Justification: FTBFS > Tags: trixie sid ftbfs > User: lu...@debian.org > Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf > > Hi, &

Bug#1069307: FTBFS: configure: error: must specify --with-locking-method option

Control: tags -1 patch On 2024-04-19 Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote: > Source: courier > Version: 1.0.16-3.2 > Severity: serious > Tags: ftbfs > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=courier&arch=armel&ver=1.0.16-3.2%2Bb4&stamp=1712019536&raw=0 > checking for locking method... configure: er

Processed: Re: Bug#1069307: FTBFS: configure: error: must specify --with-locking-method option

Processing control commands: > tags -1 patch Bug #1069307 [src:courier] FTBFS: configure: error: must specify --with-locking-method option Added tag(s) patch. -- 1069307: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1069307 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with prob

Processed (with 1 error): Re: dolfin: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

Processing control commands: > severity 1062405 testing Severity level `testing' is not known. Recognized are: critical, grave, serious, important, normal, minor, wishlist, fixed. > tags 1062405 moreinfo Bug #1062405 [src:dolfin] dolfin: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition Added tag(s) moreinf

Bug#1062405: dolfin: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

Source: dolfin Followup-For: Bug #1062405 Control: severity 1062405 testing Control: tags 1062405 moreinfo This time_t patch was never applied. Is it not needed after all? Can we close this bug now?

Processed: Re: Bug#1069370: shasta: FTBFS: dpkg-shlibdeps: error: cannot continue due to the error above

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # also happens in amd64 > retitle 1069370 shasta: FTBFS: dpkg-shlibdeps: error: cannot continue due to > the error above Bug #1069370 [src:shasta] shasta: FTBFS on arm64: dpkg-shlibdeps: error: cannot continue due to the error above Changed Bug

Processed: Re: Bug#1056901: network-manager-fortisslvpn: 1.4.0-1

Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #1056901 [src:network-manager-fortisslvpn] network-manager-fortisslvpn: 1.4.0-1 Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > tags -1 ftbfs Bug #1056901 [src:network-manager-fortisslvpn] network-manager-fortisslvpn: 1.4.0-1 Added tag(s) ftbfs

Processed: Re: Bug#1056898: pptpd: Build failures with ppp-2.5.0

Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #1056898 [src:pptpd] pptpd: Build failures with ppp-2.5.0 Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > tags -1 ftbfs Bug #1056898 [src:pptpd] pptpd: Build failures with ppp-2.5.0 Added tag(s) ftbfs. -- 1056898: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bi

Bug#1064293: less: CVE-2022-48624

On 2024-04-20 at 16:19, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: > On Sat, 2024-04-20 at 07:54 -0400, P. J. McDermott wrote: > > Then the salvage procedure can play out for the full 28+ days > > specified > > by developers-reference (21 days to allow the maintainer to object > > followed by a DELAYED/7 adop

Bug#1069446: marked as done (osmo-iuh: FTBFS on armhf: unsatisfiable build-dependencies: libosmo-netif-dev (>= 1.2.0), libosmo-sigtran-dev (>= 1.6.0))

essage --- Source: osmo-iuh Version: 1.3.0+dfsg1-6 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armhf. Relevant part (hop

Bug#1069247: libconfig-model-dpkg-perl: test failures

On Sat, 20 Apr 2024 11:09:17 +0200, Dominique Dumont wrote: > This really looks like a bug with prove: > > $ perl t/reorder.t > ok 1 - test re-ordered list > 1..1 > $ prove -l -v -p t/reorder.t > t/reorder.t .. > ok 1 - test re-ordered list > 1..1 > Failed 1/1 subtests > > Test Sum

Bug#1066574: marked as done (xbill: FTBFS: Game.c:258:21: error: implicit declaration of function ‘strncasecmp’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration])

Your message dated Sat, 20 Apr 2024 14:55:25 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1066574: fixed in xbill 2.1-10 has caused the Debian Bug report #1066574, regarding xbill: FTBFS: Game.c:258:21: error: implicit declaration of function ‘strncasecmp’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] to

Processed: bug 1069390 is forwarded to https://gitlab.com/gnutls/guile/-/issues/25

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 1069390 https://gitlab.com/gnutls/guile/-/issues/25 Bug #1069390 [src:guile-gnutls] guile-gnutls: FTBFS on arm64: dh_auto_test: error: cd b4deb && make -j4 check "TESTSUITEFLAGS=-j4 --verbose" VERBOSE=1 returned exit code 2 Set Bug for

Processed: Re: Bug#1069259: haskell-termonad: FTBFS on armhf: callStackDoc, called at compiler/GHC/Utils/Panic.hs:182:37 in ghc:GHC.Utils.Panic

Processing control commands: > severity -1 important Bug #1069259 [src:haskell-termonad] haskell-termonad: FTBFS on armhf: callStackDoc, called at compiler/GHC/Utils/Panic.hs:182:37 in ghc:GHC.Utils.Panic Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' -- 1069259: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bu

Bug#1069259: haskell-termonad: FTBFS on armhf: callStackDoc, called at compiler/GHC/Utils/Panic.hs:182:37 in ghc:GHC.Utils.Panic

Control: severity -1 important On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 10:48PM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=haskell-termonad&arch=armhf&ver=4.5.0.0-1%2Bb4&stamp=1713092640&raw=0 This appears to be a GHC bug. I have requested the removal of haskell-termonad from armh

Bug#1069550: marked as done (kvirc: FTBFS on armel: build-dependency not installable: qtwebengine5-dev)

 --- Source: kvirc Version: 4:5.2.2+dfsg-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armel Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armel. Relevant part (hopefully

Bug#1069368: Updating golang-github-golang-protobuf-1-5 to fix FTBFS

On Sat, Apr 20, 2024 at 10:28 PM Mathias Gibbens wrote: > > Hi Anthony, > > A few weeks ago you uploaded a new version of golang-google-protobuf > to unstable which caused a FTBFS in golang-github-golang-protobuf-1-5 > v1.5.3 [1,2,3]. This has been blocking the transition of various golang > pac

Bug#1069368: Updating golang-github-golang-protobuf-1-5 to fix FTBFS

Hi Anthony, A few weeks ago you uploaded a new version of golang-google-protobuf to unstable which caused a FTBFS in golang-github-golang-protobuf-1-5 v1.5.3 [1,2,3]. This has been blocking the transition of various golang packages from unstable to testing. I've verified that v1.5.4 of golang

Bug#1067547: wmweather+: diff for NMU version 2.19~alpha+ds-1.1

[Cc'ing t...@debian.org as I probably should have done with the nmudiff. Apologies] On 2024-04-18, at 21:37:40 +0100, Jeremy Sowden wrote: > Control: tags 1067547 + patch > Control: tags 1067547 + pending > > > Dear maintainer, > > I've prepared an NMU for wmweather+ (versioned as 2.19~alpha+ds

Bug#1064293: less: CVE-2022-48624

On Sat, 2024-04-20 at 07:54 -0400, P. J. McDermott wrote: > Then the salvage procedure can play out for the full 28+ days > specified > by developers-reference (21 days to allow the maintainer to object > followed by a DELAYED/7 adoption upload).  I've already soft-proposed > to > salvage in bug #1

Bug#1067560: marked as done (FTBFS on 32-bit time64 architectures: cannot convert ‘long int*’ to ‘const time_t*’ {aka ‘const long long int*’})

Your message dated Sat, 20 Apr 2024 13:49:50 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1067560: fixed in deepin-log-viewer 5.9.7+ds1-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1067560, regarding FTBFS on 32-bit time64 architectures: cannot convert ‘long int*’ to ‘const time_t*’ {aka ‘const long long in

Bug#1069367: qemu: FTBFS on arm64: build-dependency not installable: gcc-powerpc64-linux-gnu

On 20/04/24 at 15:39 +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote: > 20.04.2024 15:33, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > [..] > > This is part of a mass rebuild, first building on arm64 and then on > > armhf and armel. So I'm not suggesting anything. :-) > > Aha. > > > Is this failing because the build is trying to build

Bug#1066224:

Tags: +acknowledge On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 12:02:13PM +0200, Miriam Espana Acebal wrote: > Hi, > > In ubuntu we applied the upstream's fix at > https://github.com/radvd-project/radvd/pull/196. I adapted it to a pair of > patches that I attach here for fixing this FTBFS. > > I am sending this for

Bug#1069556: rovclock: FTBFS on armel: rovclock.c:27:10: fatal error: sys/io.h: No such file or directory

Source: rovclock Version: 0.6e-7 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armel Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armel. Relevant part (hopefully): > gcc

Bug#1069557: libkdumpfile: FTBFS on armel: dh_auto_test: error: make -j4 check "TESTSUITEFLAGS=-j4 --verbose" VERBOSE=1 returned exit code 2

Source: libkdumpfile Version: 0.5.4-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armel Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armel. Relevant part (hopefully): > m

Bug#1069553: xsd: FTBFS on armel: dh_auto_test: error: make -j4 test returned exit code 2

Source: xsd Version: 4.0.0-9 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armel Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armel. Relevant part (hopefully): > mak

Bug#1069555: gtk-d: FTBFS on armel: unsatisfiable build-dependencies: dh-dlang (>= 0.6.6), gir-to-d

Source: gtk-d Version: 3.10.0-3 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armel Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armel. Relevant part (hopefully

Bug#1069554: winff: FTBFS on armel: build-dependency not installable: libreoffice-draw-nogui

Source: winff Version: 1.6.3+dfsg-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armel Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armel. Relevant part (hopefully

Bug#1069552: freecontact: FTBFS on armel: make[1]: *** [Makefile:469: all-recursive] Error 1

Source: freecontact Version: 1.0.21-13.1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armel Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armel. Relevant part (hopefully

Bug#1069549: racket: FTBFS on armel: dh_install: error: missing files, aborting

Source: racket Version: 8.12+dfsg1-7 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armel Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armel. Relevant part (hopefully): > m

Bug#1069550: kvirc: FTBFS on armel: build-dependency not installable: qtwebengine5-dev

Source: kvirc Version: 4:5.2.2+dfsg-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armel Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armel. Relevant part (hopefully

Bug#1069548: haskell-yesod-auth-hashdb: FTBFS on armel: unsatisfiable build-dependencies

Source: haskell-yesod-auth-hashdb Version: 1.7.1.7-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armel Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armel. Relevant part

Bug#1069547: libkolabxml: FTBFS on armel: make[3]: *** [CMakeFiles/generate_bindings.dir/build.make:89: bindings/kolabformat.cxx] Error 132

Source: libkolabxml Version: 1.2.1-5 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armel Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armel. Relevant part (hopefully): > m

Bug#1069546: ktorrent: FTBFS on armel: dh_install: error: missing files, aborting

Source: ktorrent Version: 22.12.3-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armel Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armel. Relevant part (hopefully): > mak

Bug#1069544: mame: FTBFS on armel: collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status

Source: mame Version: 0.264+dfsg.1-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armel Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armel. Relevant part (hopefully): >

Bug#1069542: octave: FTBFS on armel: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:59: override_dh_auto_build-indep] Error 1

Source: octave Version: 8.4.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armel Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armel. Relevant part (hopefully): > mak

Bug#1069543: haskell-gi-vte: FTBFS on armel: unsatisfiable build-dependencies

Source: haskell-gi-vte Version: 2.91.31-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armel Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armel. Relevant part (hopefully

Bug#1069541: haskell-gi-dbusmenugtk3: FTBFS on armel: unsatisfiable build-dependencies

Source: haskell-gi-dbusmenugtk3 Version: 0.4.14-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armel Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armel. Relevant part

Bug#1069538: zeroc-ice: FTBFS on armel: make[3]: *** [Makefile:29: tests] Error 1

Source: zeroc-ice Version: 3.7.10-2.2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armel Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armel. Relevant part (hopefully): > m

Bug#1069537: haskell-crypton-x509-store: FTBFS on armel: unsatisfiable build-dependencies

Source: haskell-crypton-x509-store Version: 1.6.9-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armel Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armel. Relevant part

Bug#1069539: softhsm2: FTBFS on armel: dh_auto_test: error: make -j4 check "TESTSUITEFLAGS=-j4 --verbose" VERBOSE=1 returned exit code 2

Source: softhsm2 Version: 2.6.1-2.2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armel Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armel. Relevant part (hopefully): > mak

Bug#1069536: glib-d: FTBFS on armel: unsatisfiable build-dependencies: dh-dlang (>= 0.6.2), gir-to-d (>= 0.23.2)

Source: glib-d Version: 2.4.3-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armel Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armel. Relevant part (hopefully

Bug#1069535: galera-3: FTBFS on armel: dh_auto_test: error: cd obj-arm-linux-gnueabi && make -j1 test ARGS\+=--verbose ARGS\+=-j1 ARGS=--output-on-failure returned exit code 2

Source: galera-3 Version: 25.3.37-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armel Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armel. Relevant part (hopefully): > mak

Bug#1069534: pycryptodome: FTBFS on armel: ld: /usr/lib/gcc/arm-linux-gnueabi/13/libasan.so: undefined reference to `__atomic_compare_exchange_8'

Source: pycryptodome Version: 3.20.0+dfsg-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armel Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armel. Relevant part (hopefully

Bug#1069331: marked as done (Not installable due to hardcoded pre-t64 library deps)

Your message dated Sat, 20 Apr 2024 13:19:24 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1069331: fixed in cegui-mk2 0.8.7+git20220615-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #1069331, regarding Not installable due to hardcoded pre-t64 library deps to be marked as done. This means that you claim that t

Bug#1069532: dune-istl: FTBFS on armhf: umfpack.hh:106:27: error: cannot convert ‘long int*’ to ‘const int64_t*’ {aka ‘const long long int*’}

Source: dune-istl Version: 2.9.0-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armhf. Relevant part (hopefully): >

Processed: found 1069399 in ruby3.1/3.1.2-8

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # i've noticed this problem before, but it is intermittent > found 1069399 ruby3.1/3.1.2-8 Bug #1069399 [src:ruby3.1] ruby3.1: FTBFS on arm64: Errno::EADDRINUSE: Address already in use - listen(2) Marked as found in versions ruby3.1/3.1.2-8. > th

Bug#1069531: rcs-blame: FTBFS on armhf: mktime.c:106:52: error: size of array ‘a’ is negative

Source: rcs-blame Version: 1.3.1-4.2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armhf. Relevant part (hopefully): >

Bug#1069530: mumudvb: FTBFS on armhf: unsatisfiable build-dependency: libzvbi-common (= 0.2.42-1.1) but 0.2.42-2 is to be installed

Source: mumudvb Version: 1.7.1-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armhf. Relevant part (hopefully

Bug#1069529: tua: FTBFS on armhf: tua.c:614:24: error: conflicting types for ‘time’; have ‘time_t(long int *)’ {aka ‘long long int(long int *)’}

Source: tua Version: 4.3-14 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armhf. Relevant part (hopefully): > gcc

Bug#1069527: libchdr: FTBFS on armhf: libchdr_chd.c:3001:39: error: implicit declaration of function ‘ftello64’; did you mean ‘ftello’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Source: libchdr Version: 0.0~git20230918.9108f34+dfsg-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armhf. Relevant part

Bug#1069526: libevdevplus: FTBFS on armhf: InputEvent.hpp:23:39: error: ‘struct input_event’ has no member named ‘time’

Source: libevdevplus Version: 0.1.1-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armhf. Relevant part (hopefully): > /

Bug#1069525: libnginx-mod-http-srcache-filter: FTBFS on armhf: make: *** [debian/rules:6: binary] Error 25

Source: libnginx-mod-http-srcache-filter Version: 0.33-3 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armhf. Relevant part

Bug#1069520: sbcl: FTBFS on armhf: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:53: override_dh_auto_build] Error 1

Source: sbcl Version: 2:2.3.7-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armhf. Relevant part (hopefully): > mak

Bug#1069524: rl-renderpm: FTBFS on armhf: dpkg-buildpackage: error: dpkg-source -b . subprocess returned exit status 2

Source: rl-renderpm Version: 4.0.3-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armhf. Relevant part (hopefully): > m

Bug#1069523: libss7: FTBFS on armhf: ss7.c:654:56: error: format ‘%li’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 3 has type ‘long long int’ [-Werror=format=]

Source: libss7 Version: 2.0.0-3 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armhf. Relevant part (hopefully): > gcc -g

Bug#1069522: haskell-yesod-bin: FTBFS on armhf: unsatisfiable build-dependencies

Source: haskell-yesod-bin Version: 1.6.2.2-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armhf. Relevant part (hopefully

Bug#1069521: patat: FTBFS on armhf: unsatisfiable build-dependencies

Source: patat Version: 0.11.0.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armhf. Relevant part (hopefully

Bug#1069519: python-udatetime: FTBFS on armhf: ValueError: year 104781 is out of range

Source: python-udatetime Version: 0.0.17-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armhf. Relevant part (hopefully

Bug#1069516: abinit: FTBFS on armhf: tests fail

Source: abinit Version: 9.10.4-3 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armhf. Relevant part (hopefully): > mak

Bug#1069518: projecteur: FTBFS on armhf: deviceinput.cc:697:64: error: narrowing conversion of ‘(int32_t)ie.DeviceInputEvent::value’ from ‘int32_t’ {aka ‘int’} to ‘__u16’ {aka ‘short unsigned int’} [-

Source: projecteur Version: 0.10-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armhf. Relevant part (hopefully): > /

Bug#1069517: drogon: FTBFS on armhf: build-dependency not installable: libssl3

Source: drogon Version: 1.8.7+ds-1.1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armhf. Relevant part (hopefully

Bug#1069515: eclib: FTBFS on armhf: dh_auto_test: error: make -j4 check "TESTSUITEFLAGS=-j4 --verbose" VERBOSE=1 returned exit code 2

Source: eclib Version: 20240408-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armhf. Relevant part (hopefully): > mak

Bug#1069514: trophy: FTBFS on armhf: unsatisfiable dependencies

Source: trophy Version: 2.0.4-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armhf. Relevant part (hopefully

Bug#1069513: isochron: FTBFS on armhf: src/common.c:91:43: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 4 has type ‘__time64_t’ {aka ‘long long int’} [-Werror=format=]

Source: isochron Version: 0.9~rc4-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armhf. Relevant part (hopefully): >

Bug#1069510: elpa: FTBFS on armhf: make[5]: *** [Makefile:84371: test-suite.log] Error 1

Source: elpa Version: 2022.11.001-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armhf. Relevant part (hopefully): > mak

Bug#1069511: mpgrafic: FTBFS on armhf: tests fail

Source: mpgrafic Version: 0.3.19-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armhf. Relevant part (hopefully): > mak

Bug#1069509: r-cran-metamix: FTBFS on armhf: tests fail

Source: r-cran-metamix Version: 0.3-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armhf. Relevant part (hopefully): > m

Bug#1069507: dc3dd: FTBFS on armhf: verify.h:132:30: error: negative width in bit-field 'verify_error_if_negative_size__'

Source: dc3dd Version: 7.3.1-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armhf. Relevant part (hopefully): > gcc

Bug#1069506: prelude-lml: FTBFS on armhf: unsatisfiable build-dependencies

Source: prelude-lml Version: 5.2.0-3 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armhf. Relevant part (hopefully

Bug#1069505: tmperamental: FTBFS on armhf: features-time64.h:26:5: error: #error "_TIME_BITS=64 is allowed only with _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64"

Source: tmperamental Version: 1.4 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armhf. Relevant part (hopefully): > cc

Bug#1069503: haskell-gtk-strut: FTBFS on armhf: make: *** [/usr/share/cdbs/1/class/hlibrary.mk:170: build-haddock-stamp] Error 1

Source: haskell-gtk-strut Version: 0.1.3.2-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armhf. Relevant part (hopefully

  1   2   3   >