Bug#1066514: marked as done (lrzsz: FTBFS: error.c:172:43: error: implicit declaration of function ‘strcmp’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration])

Your message dated Sun, 17 Mar 2024 06:38:28 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1066514: fixed in lrzsz 0.12.21-11 has caused the Debian Bug report #1066514, regarding lrzsz: FTBFS: error.c:172:43: error: implicit declaration of function ‘strcmp’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] to

Bug#1066482: marked as done (ngspice: FTBFS: ../../../../src/main.c:642:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘get_local_home’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration])

Your message dated Sun, 17 Mar 2024 06:21:10 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1066482: fixed in ngspice 42+ds-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1066482, regarding ngspice: FTBFS: ../../../../src/main.c:642:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘get_local_home’ [-Werror=implicit-f

Bug#1065435: [Aptitude-devel] Bug#1065435: aptitude: FTBFS on armhf and armel (probably -Werror=implicit-function-declaration related)

Hi Steinar and Christoph, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > struct timeval > { > #ifdef __USE_TIME_BITS64 > __time64_t tv_sec;/* Seconds. */ > __suseconds64_t tv_usec; /* Microseconds. */ > #else > __time_t tv_sec; /* Seconds. */ > __suseconds_t tv_usec;

Bug#1064612: rust-ahash: Failing autopkgtests

tags 1064612 +patch thanks rust-ahash is unable to migrate to Testing because its autopkgtests are failing: A debdiff fixing this issue is attatched. diff -Nru rust-ahash-0.8.9/debian/changelog rust-ahash-0.8.9/debian/changelog --- rust-ahash-0.8.9/debian/changelog 2024-02-23 07:28:35.00

Processed: re: rust-ahash: Failing autopkgtests

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1064612 +patch Bug #1064612 [src:rust-ahash] rust-ahash: Failing autopkgtests Added tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1064612: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=106

Bug#1067027: python-cryptography build-dependencies unsatisfiable.

Package: python-cryptography Version: 41.0.7-5 Severity: serious x-debbugs-cc: eam...@debian.org, kapo...@melix.org python-cryptography build-depends on python3-cryptography-vectors (<< 41.0.8~) but unstable has version 42.0.5-1 If you need rust package updates to fix this issue, please tell

Bug#1066237: nas: FTBFS: main.c:125:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘yyparse’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 12:42:56PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: >Source: nas >Version: 1.9.4-7 >Severity: serious >Justification: FTBFS >Tags: trixie sid ftbfs >User: lu...@debian.org >Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef Thanks for the report! Nas contains some really awful old

Bug#1067013: marked as done (trn4: FTBFS with -Werror=implicit-function-declaration)

Your message dated Sun, 17 Mar 2024 01:23:26 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1067013: fixed in trn4 4.0-test77-17 has caused the Debian Bug report #1067013, regarding trn4: FTBFS with -Werror=implicit-function-declaration to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Processed: Bug#1066306 marked as pending in gmpc-plugins

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1066306 [src:gmpc-plugins] gmpc-plugins: FTBFS: plugin.c:110:13: error: implicit declaration of function ‘main_window_add_status_icon’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] Added tag(s) pending. -- 1066306: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bu

Bug#1066306: marked as pending in gmpc-plugins

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1066306 in gmpc-plugins reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/mpd-team/gmpc-plugins/-/commit/4cb2a4b9369fb3f29c00c

Processed: Re: Bug#1066261: lintian: FTBFS: hello.c:9:5: error: implicit declaration of function 'strcpy' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Processing control commands: > tag -1 patch Bug #1066261 [src:lintian] lintian: FTBFS: hello.c:9:5: error: implicit declaration of function 'strcpy' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] Added tag(s) patch. -- 1066261: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066261 Debian Bug Track

Bug#1066261: lintian: FTBFS: hello.c:9:5: error: implicit declaration of function 'strcpy' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Control: tag -1 patch On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 12:42:03PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build > on amd64. > > This is most likely caused by a change in dpkg 1.22.6, that enabled > -Werror=implicit-function-declaration. For more infor

Processed: tagging 1066438

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1066438 + confirmed Bug #1066438 [src:backuppc-rsync] backuppc-rsync: FTBFS: lib/compat.c:154:16: error: too few arguments to function ‘gettimeofday’ Added tag(s) confirmed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need a

Bug#1067024: wap-wml-tools: FTBFS with -Werror=implicit-function-declaration

Source: wap-wml-tools Version: 0.0.4-7 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs sid trixie Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Hi, wap-wml-tools FTBFS with -Werror=implicit-function-declaration which was recently enabled by default in dpkg 1.22.6 to support the 64-

Bug#1066447: marked as done (gpm: FTBFS: prog/display-buttons.c:40:10: fatal error: gpm.h: No such file or directory)

Your message dated Sun, 17 Mar 2024 01:43:22 +0100 with message-id <20240317004317.lznurenhdwq24...@sym.noone.org> and subject line Re: Bug#1066447: gpm: FTBFS: prog/display-buttons.c:40:10: fatal error: gpm.h: No such file or directory has caused the Debian Bug report #1066447, regarding gpm: FTB

Bug#1066723: marked as done (spim: FTBFS: lex.yy.c:1692:40: error: implicit declaration of function ‘isatty’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration])

Your message dated Sun, 17 Mar 2024 00:40:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1066723: fixed in spim 8.0+dfsg-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #1066723, regarding spim: FTBFS: lex.yy.c:1692:40: error: implicit declaration of function ‘isatty’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] to

Bug#1066605: marked as done (ifmail: FTBFS: parsedate.y:39:25: error: implicit declaration of function ‘date_lex’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration])

Your message dated Sun, 17 Mar 2024 00:21:21 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1066605: fixed in ifmail 2.14tx8.10-28 has caused the Debian Bug report #1066605, regarding ifmail: FTBFS: parsedate.y:39:25: error: implicit declaration of function ‘date_lex’ [-Werror=implicit-function-decla

Bug#1066226: marked as done (fcitx-fbterm: FTBFS: fcitx-fbterm.c:116:5: error: implicit declaration of function ‘fcitx_client_enable_ic’; did you mean ‘fcitx_client_focus_in’? [-Werror=implicit-functi

Your message dated Sun, 17 Mar 2024 00:18:50 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1066226: fixed in fcitx-fbterm 0.2.0-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #1066226, regarding fcitx-fbterm: FTBFS: fcitx-fbterm.c:116:5: error: implicit declaration of function ‘fcitx_client_enable_ic’; did you

Bug#1067013: marked as pending in trn4

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1067013 in trn4 reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/trn4/-/commit/b62b2875b57f3cd7977c498cfd480bf0ec87554

Processed: Bug#1067013 marked as pending in trn4

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1067013 [src:trn4] trn4: FTBFS with -Werror=implicit-function-declaration Added tag(s) pending. -- 1067013: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1067013 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Bug#1066793 marked as pending in python-uvicorn

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1066793 [src:python-uvicorn] python-uvicorn: FTBFS: RuntimeError: Unexpected ASGI message 'http.response.body' sent, after response already completed. Added tag(s) pending. -- 1066793: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066793

Bug#1066417: marked as done (perdition: FTBFS: perditiondb_nis.h:32:10: fatal error: rpcsvc/ypclnt.h: No such file or directory)

Your message dated Sat, 16 Mar 2024 23:42:23 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1066417: fixed in perdition 2.2-3.3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1066417, regarding perdition: FTBFS: perditiondb_nis.h:32:10: fatal error: rpcsvc/ypclnt.h: No such file or directory to be marked as done.

Bug#1066793: marked as pending in python-uvicorn

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1066793 in python-uvicorn reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/python-uvicorn/-/commit/55718

Bug#1065109: marked as done (perdition: FTBFS: missing build-dep on libnsl-dev)

Your message dated Sat, 16 Mar 2024 23:42:23 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1065109: fixed in perdition 2.2-3.3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1065109, regarding perdition: FTBFS: missing build-dep on libnsl-dev to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has b

Processed: tagging 1063944, tagging 1063948, tagging 1063960, tagging 1063976, tagging 1065947, tagging 1065963 ...

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1063944 + sid trixie Bug #1063944 [libcloud] libcloud: autopkgtest regression with pytest 8 Added tag(s) sid and trixie. > tags 1063948 + sid trixie Bug #1063948 [ipyparallel] ipyparallel: autopkgtest regression with pytest 8 Added tag(s) sid

Bug#1065180: marked as done (argus-clients: missing build-dep on libtirpc-dev)

Your message dated Sat, 16 Mar 2024 23:34:41 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1065180: fixed in argus-clients 1:3.0.8.2-6.3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1065180, regarding argus-clients: missing build-dep on libtirpc-dev to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the prob

Bug#1065179: marked as done (argus: missing build-dep on libtirpc-dev)

Your message dated Sat, 16 Mar 2024 23:34:28 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1065179: fixed in argus 2:3.0.8.2-2.3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1065179, regarding argus: missing build-dep on libtirpc-dev to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dea

Processed: argus-clients: diff for NMU version 1:3.0.8.2-6.3

Processing control commands: > tags 1065180 + patch Bug #1065180 [src:argus-clients] argus-clients: missing build-dep on libtirpc-dev Added tag(s) patch. -- 1065180: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1065180 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1065180: argus-clients: diff for NMU version 1:3.0.8.2-6.3

Control: tags 1065180 + patch Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for argus-clients (versioned as 1:3.0.8.2-6.3). The diff is attached to this message. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher diff -Nru argus-clients-3.0.8.2/debian/changelog argus-clients-3.0.8.2/debian/changelog --- argus-clients-3.0.8.

Processed: argus: diff for NMU version 2:3.0.8.2-2.3

Processing control commands: > tags 1065179 + patch Bug #1065179 [src:argus] argus: missing build-dep on libtirpc-dev Added tag(s) patch. -- 1065179: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1065179 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1065179: argus: diff for NMU version 2:3.0.8.2-2.3

Control: tags 1065179 + patch Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for argus (versioned as 2:3.0.8.2-2.3). The diff is attached to this message. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher diff -Nru argus-3.0.8.2/debian/changelog argus-3.0.8.2/debian/changelog --- argus-3.0.8.2/debian/changelog 2023-02-12 17

Processed: perdition: diff for NMU version 2.2-3.3

Processing control commands: > tags 1065109 + patch Bug #1065109 [src:perdition] perdition: FTBFS: missing build-dep on libnsl-dev Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1065109 to the same tags previously set > tags 1066417 + patch Bug #1066417 [src:perdition] perdition: FTBFS: perditiondb_nis.h:

Processed: perdition: diff for NMU version 2.2-3.3

Processing control commands: > tags 1065109 + patch Bug #1065109 [src:perdition] perdition: FTBFS: missing build-dep on libnsl-dev Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1065109 to the same tags previously set > tags 1066417 + patch Bug #1066417 [src:perdition] perdition: FTBFS: perditiondb_nis.h:

Processed: perdition: diff for NMU version 2.2-3.3

Processing control commands: > tags 1065109 + patch Bug #1065109 [src:perdition] perdition: FTBFS: missing build-dep on libnsl-dev Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1065109 to the same tags previously set > tags 1066417 + patch Bug #1066417 [src:perdition] perdition: FTBFS: perditiondb_nis.h:

Bug#1065109: perdition: diff for NMU version 2.2-3.3

Control: tags 1065109 + patch Control: tags 1066417 + patch Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for perdition (versioned as 2.2-3.3). The diff is attached to this message. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher diff -Nru perdition-2.2/debian/changelog perdition-2.2/debian/changelog --- perdition-2.2/de

Bug#1065109: perdition: diff for NMU version 2.2-3.3

Control: tags 1065109 + patch Control: tags 1066417 + patch Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for perdition (versioned as 2.2-3.3). The diff is attached to this message. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher diff -Nru perdition-2.2/debian/changelog perdition-2.2/debian/changelog --- perdition-2.2/de

Processed: perdition: diff for NMU version 2.2-3.3

Processing control commands: > tags 1065109 + patch Bug #1065109 [src:perdition] perdition: FTBFS: missing build-dep on libnsl-dev Added tag(s) patch. > tags 1066417 + patch Bug #1066417 [src:perdition] perdition: FTBFS: perditiondb_nis.h:32:10: fatal error: rpcsvc/ypclnt.h: No such file or direc

Bug#1066530: marked as done (pd-tclpd: FTBFS: tcl_class.c:108:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘error’; did you mean ‘perror’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration])

Your message dated Sat, 16 Mar 2024 23:10:36 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1066530: fixed in pd-tclpd 0.3.1-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1066530, regarding pd-tclpd: FTBFS: tcl_class.c:108:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘error’; did you mean ‘perror’? [-Werror=impl

Bug#1066501: marked as done (pd-wiimote: FTBFS: wiimote.c:736:7: error: implicit declaration of function ‘error’; did you mean ‘perror’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration])

Your message dated Sat, 16 Mar 2024 23:10:50 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1066501: fixed in pd-wiimote 0.3.2-9 has caused the Debian Bug report #1066501, regarding pd-wiimote: FTBFS: wiimote.c:736:7: error: implicit declaration of function ‘error’; did you mean ‘perror’? [-Werror=im

Bug#1067021: mrpt ftbfs on armhf (32bit time_t64 architecture)

Package: src:mrpt Version: 1:2.11.10+ds-2 Severity: serious Tags: sid trixie ftbfs the package ftbfs on armhf (32bit time_t64 architecture): full build log at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mrpt/1:2.11.10+ds-2/+build/27932950 [...] [100%] Building CXX object python/CMakeFiles/pymrpt.dir/

Bug#1066530: marked as pending in pd-tclpd

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1066530 in pd-tclpd reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/multimedia-team/pd/pd-tclpd/-/commit/e510c6ce0f05c3e0646

Processed: Bug#1066530 marked as pending in pd-tclpd

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1066530 [src:pd-tclpd] pd-tclpd: FTBFS: tcl_class.c:108:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘error’; did you mean ‘perror’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] Added tag(s) pending. -- 1066530: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrep

Processed: Bug#1066501 marked as pending in pd-wiimote

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1066501 [src:pd-wiimote] pd-wiimote: FTBFS: wiimote.c:736:7: error: implicit declaration of function ‘error’; did you mean ‘perror’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] Added tag(s) pending. -- 1066501: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugr

Bug#1066501: marked as pending in pd-wiimote

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1066501 in pd-wiimote reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/multimedia-team/pd/pd-wiimote/-/commit/cdb6bae88ee7786

Bug#1066699: marked as done (pd-unauthorized: FTBFS: blinkenlights.c:770:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘error’; did you mean ‘perror’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration])

Your message dated Sat, 16 Mar 2024 22:42:55 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1066699: fixed in pd-unauthorized 0.1-8 has caused the Debian Bug report #1066699, regarding pd-unauthorized: FTBFS: blinkenlights.c:770:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘error’; did you mean ‘perror

Bug#1067018: lnav: FTBFS on arm{el,hf}: test failures

Source: lnav Version: 0.11.2-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) X-Debbugs-Cc: sramac...@debian.org https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=lnav&arch=armhf&ver=0.11.2-1%2Bb1&stamp=1710618595&raw=0 2024-03-16T19:49:

Bug#1067017: jupyterlab: Use node-long package

Source: jupyterlab Version: 4.0.11+ds1-1 Severity: serious Justification: duplicate code source not build from source Dear Maintainer, Your package include the following file packaged elsewhere python3-jupyterlab: /usr/share/jupyter/lab/staging/node_modules/@xtuc/long/LICENSE python3-jupyterlab:

Bug#1067016: osslsigncode: FTBFS on arm{el,hf}: test failures

Source: osslsigncode Version: 2.8-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) X-Debbugs-Cc: sramac...@debian.org https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=osslsigncode&arch=armhf&ver=2.8-1&stamp=1710618749&raw=0 The followin

Bug#1067015: xrootd: FTBFS on arm{el,hf}: /usr/include/features-time64.h:26:5: error: #error "_TIME_BITS=64 is allowed only with _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64"

Source: xrootd Version: 5.6.7-1.1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) X-Debbugs-Cc: sramac...@debian.org https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=xrootd&arch=armhf&ver=5.6.7-1.1&stamp=1710627143&raw=0 make[4]: Leaving

Processed: tagging 1065700

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1065700 + ftbfs Bug #1065700 [mysql-8.0] mysql-8.0: ftbfs with 64-bit time_t on 32-bit archs Added tag(s) ftbfs. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1065700: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrep

Bug#1066699: marked as pending in pd-unauthorized

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1066699 in pd-unauthorized reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/multimedia-team/pd/pd-unauthorized/-/commit/1fb0a

Processed: Bug#1066699 marked as pending in pd-unauthorized

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1066699 [src:pd-unauthorized] pd-unauthorized: FTBFS: blinkenlights.c:770:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘error’; did you mean ‘perror’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] Added tag(s) pending. -- 1066699: https://bugs.debian.

Bug#1066665: marked as done (pd-ggee: FTBFS: control/unwonk.c:59:31: error: implicit declaration of function ‘error’; did you mean ‘perror’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration])

Your message dated Sat, 16 Mar 2024 22:13:56 + with message-id and subject line Bug#105: fixed in pd-ggee 0.28-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #105, regarding pd-ggee: FTBFS: control/unwonk.c:59:31: error: implicit declaration of function ‘error’; did you mean ‘perror’? [-Werror=i

Bug#1066650: marked as done (pd-fftease: FTBFS: fftease_utilities.c:56:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘error’; did you mean ‘perror’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration])

Your message dated Sat, 16 Mar 2024 22:13:49 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1066650: fixed in pd-fftease 3.0.1-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #1066650, regarding pd-fftease: FTBFS: fftease_utilities.c:56:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘error’; did you mean ‘perror’? [

Bug#1067013: trn4: FTBFS with -Werror=implicit-function-declaration

Source: trn4 Version: 4.0-test77-16 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs sid trixie Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Hi, trn4 FTBFS with -Werror=implicit-function-declaration which was recently enabled by default in dpkg 1.22.6 to support the 64-bit time_t t

Processed: Bug#1066650 marked as pending in pd-fftease

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1066650 [src:pd-fftease] pd-fftease: FTBFS: fftease_utilities.c:56:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘error’; did you mean ‘perror’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] Added tag(s) pending. -- 1066650: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi

Bug#1066650: marked as pending in pd-fftease

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1066650 in pd-fftease reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/multimedia-team/pd/pd-fftease/-/commit/925dcf60b0e822a

Bug#1066627: marked as done (pd-cxc: FTBFS: reson~.c:131:17: error: implicit declaration of function ‘error’; did you mean ‘perror’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration])

Your message dated Sat, 16 Mar 2024 21:45:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1066627: fixed in pd-cxc 0.5.2-8 has caused the Debian Bug report #1066627, regarding pd-cxc: FTBFS: reson~.c:131:17: error: implicit declaration of function ‘error’; did you mean ‘perror’? [-Werror=implicit-f

Bug#1066542: marked as done (pd-boids: FTBFS: boids2d.c:472:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘error’; did you mean ‘perror’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration])

Your message dated Sat, 16 Mar 2024 21:45:04 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1066542: fixed in pd-boids 1.1.1-10 has caused the Debian Bug report #1066542, regarding pd-boids: FTBFS: boids2d.c:472:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘error’; did you mean ‘perror’? [-Werror=impli

Bug#1065793: marked as done (charliecloud: FTBFS on arm{el,hf}: ch_fuse.c:68:19: error: initialization of ‘void (*)(struct fuse_req *, fuse_ino_t, uint64_t)’ {aka ‘void (*)(struct fuse_req *, long lo

Your message dated Sat, 16 Mar 2024 21:44:30 + with message-id <330c40b3-84f9-412b-b256-55d5841c3...@posteo.de> and subject line Re: Bug#1065793: charliecloud: FTBFS on arm{el,hf}: ch_fuse.c:68:19: error: initialization of ‘void (*)(struct fuse_req *, fuse_ino_t, uint64_t)’ {aka ‘void (*)(str

Processed: tagging 1065486

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1065486 + ftbfs Bug #1065486 [src:sbd] sbd: FTBFS due to hardcoded libaio SONAME used in dlopen() Added tag(s) ftbfs. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1065486: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/

Bug#1066665: marked as pending in pd-ggee

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #105 in pd-ggee reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/multimedia-team/pd/pd-ggee/-/commit/be0f38d8bd028cf228a02

Processed: Bug#1066665 marked as pending in pd-ggee

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #105 [src:pd-ggee] pd-ggee: FTBFS: control/unwonk.c:59:31: error: implicit declaration of function ‘error’; did you mean ‘perror’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] Added tag(s) pending. -- 105: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bug

Bug#1067012: renderdoc: FTBFS with glslang 14: fatal error: glslang/Include/Types.h: No such file or directory

Source: renderdoc Version: 1.27+dfsg-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) renderdoc FTBFS with glslang 14 in sid due to a missing header: [184/311] /usr/bin/c++ -DAMD_EXTENSIONS -DDISTRIBUTION_CONTACT=\"https://salsa.debia

Processed: affects 1067010 + src:charliecloud

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > affects 1067010 + src:charliecloud Bug #1067010 [libsquashfuse-dev] libsquashfuse-dev: Incompatible pointer types on 32-bit architectures Added indication that 1067010 affects src:charliecloud > End of message, stopping processing here. Please c

Processed: bug 1065973 is forwarded to https://github.com/kmod-project/kmod/issues/37

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 1065973 https://github.com/kmod-project/kmod/issues/37 Bug #1065973 [src:kmod] kmod: FTBFS on arm{el,hf}: /usr/include/features-time64.h:26:5: error: #error "_TIME_BITS=64 is allowed only with _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64" Set Bug forwarded-to

Processed: close

Processing control commands: > close -1 Bug #1062636 [src:libsrm] libsrm: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition Marked Bug as done -- 1062636: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1062636 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1062636: close

Control: close -1 -- Closing this as the ABI is unaffected in time_t transition. Adding irc chat for reference: Mar 16 18:01:25 sudip: libsrm> it appears a later analysis showed the ABI was unaffected but we missed closing the bug so far, sorry. You can close it with this explanation (

Bug#1066627: marked as pending in pd-cxc

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1066627 in pd-cxc reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/multimedia-team/pd/pd-cxc/-/commit/163be996c77f1b1914d0989

Bug#1066531: marked as done (policykit-1: FTBFS: ../subprojects/mocklibc-1.0/src/netgroup-debug.c:25:3: error: implicit declaration of function ‘print_indent’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration])

Your message dated Sat, 16 Mar 2024 21:04:24 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1066531: fixed in policykit-1 124-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1066531, regarding policykit-1: FTBFS: ../subprojects/mocklibc-1.0/src/netgroup-debug.c:25:3: error: implicit declaration of function ‘pri

Processed: Bug#1066627 marked as pending in pd-cxc

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1066627 [src:pd-cxc] pd-cxc: FTBFS: reson~.c:131:17: error: implicit declaration of function ‘error’; did you mean ‘perror’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] Added tag(s) pending. -- 1066627: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cg

Bug#1067009: lomiri-ui-toolkit: FTBFS: 63 failures which MUST be fixed

Source: lomiri-ui-toolkit Version: 1.3.5012+dfsg-5 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Control: block 1061179 by -1 Dear Maintainer, As can be seen in [1], the package failed to build on buildds in unstable. The relevant pa

Processed: lomiri-ui-toolkit: FTBFS: 63 failures which MUST be fixed

Processing control commands: > block 1061179 by -1 Bug #1061179 [release.debian.org] transition: qtbase-abi-5-15-13 1061179 was blocked by: 1060761 1060802 1061179 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 1061179: 1067009 -- 1061179: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1

Bug#1067010: libsquashfuse-dev: Incompatible pointer types on 32-bit architectures

Package: libsquashfuse-dev Version: 0.5.0-2 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs fixed-upstream Affects: src:charliecloud Dear Maintainer, squashfuse suffers from an incompatible pointer type issue on 32-bit architectures. Checking the latest build logs for armel, armhf and i386 ([0], [1], [2]) one find

Processed: Bug#1066542 marked as pending in pd-boids

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1066542 [src:pd-boids] pd-boids: FTBFS: boids2d.c:472:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘error’; did you mean ‘perror’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] Added tag(s) pending. -- 1066542: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrepor

Bug#1066542: marked as pending in pd-boids

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1066542 in pd-boids reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/multimedia-team/pd/pd-boids/-/commit/9c270f1be0226ba841e

Bug#1066195: a56: FTBFS: keybld.c:29:15: error: implicit declaration of function ‘gets’; did you mean ‘fgets’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Control: tags -1 patch Please find a patch attached.diff -Nru a56-1.3+dfsg/debian/changelog a56-1.3+dfsg/debian/changelog --- a56-1.3+dfsg/debian/changelog 2024-01-13 22:00:00.0 + +++ a56-1.3+dfsg/debian/changelog 2024-03-16 20:29:00.0 + @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +a56 (

Processed: Re: a56: FTBFS: keybld.c:29:15: error: implicit declaration of function ‘gets’; did you mean ‘fgets’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Processing control commands: > tags -1 patch Bug #1066195 [src:a56] a56: FTBFS: keybld.c:29:15: error: implicit declaration of function ‘gets’; did you mean ‘fgets’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] Added tag(s) patch. -- 1066195: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=106619

Bug#1067005: libLLVM.so symbols are no longer versioned?

Hello I am aware and it is an upstream change; I need to adjust our package. Cheers Sylvestre Le 16/03/2024 à 19:49, Roman Lebedev a écrit : Package: libllvm18 > Version: 1:18.1.1-1 > Severity: serious > File: /usr/lib/llvm-18/lib/libLLVM.so.18.1, /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libLLVM-17.so.1 >

Bug#1067005: libLLVM.so symbols are no longer versioned?

Package: libllvm18 Version: 1:18.1.1-1 Followup-For: Bug #1067005 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 I've just tried building the halide package against LLVM17 (instead of LLVM18), and the bug no longer happens, so it's, almost assuredly, symbol versioning, in my opinion. Roman. -

Bug#1066611: marked as done (gmpc: FTBFS: Tools/gmpc-database-update-tracker.c:154:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘main_window_add_status_icon’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration])

Your message dated Sat, 16 Mar 2024 19:06:06 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1066611: fixed in gmpc 11.8.16-21 has caused the Debian Bug report #1066611, regarding gmpc: FTBFS: Tools/gmpc-database-update-tracker.c:154:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘main_window_add_status_i

Bug#1066595: marked as done (phylip: FTBFS: drawgram.c:2111:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘makebox’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration])

Your message dated Sat, 16 Mar 2024 19:06:14 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1066595: fixed in phylip 1:3.697+dfsg-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #1066595, regarding phylip: FTBFS: drawgram.c:2111:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘makebox’ [-Werror=implicit-function-decla

Bug#1066137: gnupg1: fails to build gpgkeys_ldap, probably due to -Werror=implicit-function-declaration

Hi Andreas, >Afaict ghostscript/fig2dev have stopped being blockers so I do not plan >on doing another upload (with more work for the other autobuilders) just >to temporarily disable these b-ds. Indeed, that’s fine. But including that in the n̲e̲x̲t̲ upload you do anyway would be nice. Thanks, /

Bug#1060205: marked as done (castxml: BD-Uninstallable: castxml build-depends on missing: libclang-17-dev:mips64el)

Your message dated Sat, 16 Mar 2024 19:57:24 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1060205: castxml: BD-Uninstallable: castxml build-depends on missing: libclang-17-dev:mips64el has caused the Debian Bug report #1060205, regarding castxml: BD-Uninstallable: castxml build-depends on missi

Processed: Bug#1066611 marked as pending in gmpc

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1066611 [src:gmpc] gmpc: FTBFS: Tools/gmpc-database-update-tracker.c:154:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘main_window_add_status_icon’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] Added tag(s) pending. -- 1066611: https://bugs.debian.org

Bug#1066611: marked as pending in gmpc

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1066611 in gmpc reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/mpd-team/gmpc/-/commit/f75c68077d5ab7de53e01c0b736b64c0736aa

Bug#1067005: libLLVM.so symbols are no longer versioned?

Package: libllvm18 Version: 1:18.1.1-1 Severity: serious File: /usr/lib/llvm-18/lib/libLLVM.so.18.1, /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libLLVM-17.so.1 X-Debbugs-Cc: Sylvestre Ledru , Gianfranco Costamagna -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 I'm having a bit of a deja-vu here, because this

Processed: Bug#1066595 marked as pending in phylip

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1066595 [src:phylip] phylip: FTBFS: drawgram.c:2111:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘makebox’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] Added tag(s) pending. -- 1066595: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066595 Debian

Bug#1066595: marked as pending in phylip

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1066595 in phylip reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/phylip/-/commit/2d8182d9e4cd2ec150e0238d77ba0629c

Bug#1066639: marked as done (rlpr: FTBFS: error.c:175:43: error: implicit declaration of function ‘strcmp’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration])

Your message dated Sat, 16 Mar 2024 18:22:24 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1066639: fixed in rlpr 2.06-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1066639, regarding rlpr: FTBFS: error.c:175:43: error: implicit declaration of function ‘strcmp’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] to be ma

Bug#1063957: python-pytest-lazy-fixture: autopkgtest regression with pytest 8

The upstream repo shows no progress for two years, affected packages should switch to alternatives.

Processed: notfixed 1061339 in 1.26.4+ds-1, fixed 1061339 in 1:1.26.4+ds-1, closing 1061339

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > notfixed 1061339 1.26.4+ds-1 Bug #1061339 {Done: Timo Röhling } [src:numpy] numpy_1.26.3-1_s390x-buildd.changes REJECTED Bug #1065330 {Done: Timo Röhling } [src:numpy] numpy_1.26.3-2_ppc64el-buildd.changes REJECTED The source 'numpy' and version

Processed: tagging 1063957, bug 1063957 is forwarded to https://github.com/TvoroG/pytest-lazy-fixture/issues/65

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1063957 + upstream Bug #1063957 [src:python-pytest-lazy-fixture] python-pytest-lazy-fixture: autopkgtest regression with pytest 8 Bug #1063973 [src:python-pytest-lazy-fixture] python-marshmallow-sqlalchemy: autopkgtest regression with pytes

Bug#1065330: marked as done (numpy_1.26.3-2_ppc64el-buildd.changes REJECTED)

Your message dated Sat, 16 Mar 2024 19:18:41 +0100 with message-id and subject line Fwd: numpy_1.26.4+ds-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into experimental has caused the Debian Bug report #1061339, regarding numpy_1.26.3-2_ppc64el-buildd.changes REJECTED to be marked as done. This means that you clai

Bug#1066523: marked as done (lprng: FTBFS: auth/krb5_auth.c:55:24: error: implicit declaration of function ‘krb5_read_message’; did you mean ‘krb5_chpw_message’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration

Your message dated Sat, 16 Mar 2024 18:20:18 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1066523: fixed in lprng 3.8.B-8 has caused the Debian Bug report #1066523, regarding lprng: FTBFS: auth/krb5_auth.c:55:24: error: implicit declaration of function ‘krb5_read_message’; did you mean ‘krb5_chpw_m

Bug#1061339: marked as done (numpy_1.26.3-1_s390x-buildd.changes REJECTED)

Your message dated Sat, 16 Mar 2024 19:18:41 +0100 with message-id and subject line Fwd: numpy_1.26.4+ds-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into experimental has caused the Debian Bug report #1061339, regarding numpy_1.26.3-1_s390x-buildd.changes REJECTED to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Processed: forcibly merging 1063957 1066789

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forcemerge 1063957 1066789 Bug #1063957 [src:python-pytest-lazy-fixture] python-pytest-lazy-fixture: autopkgtest regression with pytest 8 Bug #1063973 [src:python-pytest-lazy-fixture] python-marshmallow-sqlalchemy: autopkgtest regression with py

Processed (with 1 error): affects 1066789, affects 1066789, merging 1063957 1066789

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > affects 1066789 - src:pycoast Bug #1066789 [src:python-pytest-lazy-fixture] pycoast: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p "3.12 3.11" returned exit code 13 Removed indication that 1066789 affects src:pyc

Processed: forcibly merging 1063957 1063973 1066727 1066784 1066785

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forcemerge 1063957 1063973 1066727 1066784 1066785 Bug #1063957 [src:python-pytest-lazy-fixture] python-pytest-lazy-fixture: autopkgtest regression with pytest 8 Bug #1066785 [src:python-pytest-lazy-fixture] python-pytest-lazy-fixture: FTBFS: dh

Bug#1066998: sift: FTBFS with -Werror=implicit-function-declaration

Source: sift Version: 4.0.3b-6 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs sid trixie Justification: fails to build from source Hi, sift TBFS with -Werror=implicit-function-declaration which was recently enabled by default in dpkg 1.22.6 to support the 64-bit time_t transition. For more information, see https:

  1   2   >