Your message dated Sat, 2 Dec 2023 03:26:44 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1057223: librust-futures-util-dev: fails to install:
depends on missing librust-h2-0.3+default-dev (>= 0.3.17-~~)
has caused the Debian Bug report #1057223,
regarding librust-futures-util-dev: fails to inst
Your message dated Fri, 01 Dec 2023 21:34:14 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1043469: fixed in fnt 1.5-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1043469,
regarding fnt: insecure deb unpacking
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Santiago Vila wrote:
> The message about jobserver disappeared when I disabled parallel build.
> I guess it is some kind of Makefile bug.
The message was:
warning: jobserver unavailable: using -j1.
To me, this sounds like 'make' could not create a jobserver, because the
jobservers rely on named
Processing control commands:
> retitle -1 librust-futures-util-dev: fails to install: depends on missing
> librust-futures-io-0.3+std-dev
Bug #1057223 [librust-futures-util-dev] librust-futures-util-dev: fails to
install: depends on missing librust-h2-0.3+default-dev (>= 0.3.17-~~)
Changed Bug t
Control: retitle -1 librust-futures-util-dev: fails to install: depends on
missing librust-futures-io-0.3+std-dev
Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2023-12-01 20:46:33)
> Impossible to install, as it depends on non-existent package
> librust-h2-0.3+default-dev (>= 0.3.17-~~).
Correction: librust-futures
Package: librust-futures-util-dev
Version: 0.3.29-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Impossible to install, as it depends on non-existent package
librust-h2-0.3+default-dev (>= 0.3.17-~~).
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQIzBA
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1057120 + ftbfs
Bug #1057120 {Done: Santiago Vila } [gettext] gettext:
FTBFS on amd64 in sid chroot due to failing autopoint-3 test
Added tag(s) ftbfs.
> severity 1057120 serious
Bug #1057120 {Done: Santiago Vila } [gettext] gettext:
FTBFS
Your message dated Fri, 01 Dec 2023 18:59:26 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1057181: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1043161,
regarding i2p: CVE-2023-36325
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Your message dated Fri, 01 Dec 2023 18:59:26 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1057181: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1031817,
regarding i2p: Migrate to Tomcat 10
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Fri, 01 Dec 2023 18:56:56 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1057216: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1018197,
regarding Removal notice: obsolete
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Fri, 01 Dec 2023 18:57:23 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1057217: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1018196,
regarding Removal notice: obsolete
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Fri, 01 Dec 2023 18:52:44 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1057206: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1054972,
regarding haskell-butcher: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies:
libghc-base-dev-4.15.1.0-6a406, libghc-monad-control-dev
Your message dated Fri, 01 Dec 2023 18:55:45 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1057214: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1054929,
regarding haskell-ixset: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies:
libghc-array-dev-0.5.4.0-0b6fa, libghc-base-dev-4.15.1.0-6
Your message dated Fri, 01 Dec 2023 18:54:45 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1057212: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1054955,
regarding haskell-fclabels: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependency:
libghc-base-orphans-dev (< 0.9) but 0.9.1-1 is to be inst
Your message dated Fri, 01 Dec 2023 18:55:14 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1057213: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1054859,
regarding haskell-diagrams-gtk: FTBFS: make: ***
[/usr/share/cdbs/1/class/hlibrary.mk:153: configure-ghc-stamp] Error 25
to
Your message dated Fri, 01 Dec 2023 18:56:16 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1057215: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1054838,
regarding haskell-mbox: FTBFS: make: ***
[/usr/share/cdbs/1/class/hlibrary.mk:153: configure-ghc-stamp] Error 25
to be marke
Your message dated Fri, 01 Dec 2023 18:53:16 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1057210: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1054851,
regarding haskell-czipwith: FTBFS: make: ***
[/usr/share/cdbs/1/class/hlibrary.mk:153: configure-ghc-stamp] Error 25
to be m
Your message dated Fri, 01 Dec 2023 18:56:16 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1057215: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1054358,
regarding Removal notice: obsolete
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Fri, 01 Dec 2023 18:53:55 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1057211: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1054356,
regarding Removal notice: obsolete
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Fri, 01 Dec 2023 18:52:44 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1057206: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1054498,
regarding Removal notice: obsolete
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Fri, 01 Dec 2023 18:54:45 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1057212: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1054357,
regarding Removal notice: obsolete
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Fri, 01 Dec 2023 18:53:16 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1057210: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1054316,
regarding Removal notice: obsolete
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Fri, 01 Dec 2023 18:55:45 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1057214: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1054319,
regarding Removal notice: obsolete
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Fri, 01 Dec 2023 18:51:21 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1057202: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1054861,
regarding haskell-binary-parsers: FTBFS: make: ***
[/usr/share/cdbs/1/class/hlibrary.mk:153: configure-ghc-stamp] Error 25
t
Your message dated Fri, 01 Dec 2023 18:51:21 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1057202: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1054596,
regarding Removal notice: obsolete
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Fri, 01 Dec 2023 18:38:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1053903: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1050596,
regarding RM: eja -- RoQA; unmaintained; severely outdated
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Fri, 01 Dec 2023 18:37:39 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1053674: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1056272,
regarding RM: g3dviewer -- ROM; abandoned upstream; depends on gtk2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Hi Francois,
On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 04:05:55PM -0800, Francois Marier wrote:
> On 2023-11-27 at 03:54:16, Helmut Grohne (hel...@subdivi.de) wrote:
> > I don't have time to update the patch right now. Let me promise an update
> > this week, ok?
I am very sorry to break this promise. It's complica
Package: systemd-sysv
Version: 255~rc1-4
Severity: serious
Justification: silent file loss in upgrade
User: helm...@debian.org
Usertags: dep17p7
Hi Luca and Michael et al,
while preparing patches for molly-guard, I figured an upgrade file loss
scenario for systemd-sysv. This is unfortunate on mul
Package: busybox
Version: 1:1.36.1-6
Severity: serious
User: helm...@debian.org
Usertags: dep17p1
Hi Chris and Michael,
I am very sorry to tell you that I found a contrieved /usr-merge problem
with the busybox upload. In essence, Conflicts allow for concurrent
unpacks in weired situations. As a c
Package: resolvconf
Version: 1.92
Severity: serious
User: helm...@debian.org
Usertags: dep17p1
Hi Andrej,
I am very sorry for not having seen this earlier. There is a tricky case
where upgrading from bookworm to sid may loose files if you
simultaneously change implementation. I am working on the
Your message dated Fri, 1 Dec 2023 19:42:42 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Fixed in 3.3.2+cleaned1-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #1049445,
regarding minexpert2 build-dependencies unsatisfiable on many architectures due
to change in daps.
to be marked as done.
This means that you cla
Your message dated Fri, 1 Dec 2023 19:42:42 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Fixed in 3.3.2+cleaned1-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #1049445,
regarding massxpert build-dependencies unsatisfiable on many architectures due
to change in daps.
to be marked as done.
This means that you clai
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 1049445 daps 3.3.2+cleaned1-5
Bug #1049445 [massxpert] massxpert build-dependencies unsatisfiable on many
architectures due to change in daps.
Bug reassigned from package 'massxpert' to 'daps'.
No longer marked as found in versions massx
Your message dated Fri, 01 Dec 2023 16:19:06 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1054950: fixed in haskell-multistate 0.8.0.4-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1054950,
regarding haskell-multistate: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependency:
libghc-hspec-dev (< 2.9) but 2.10.10-1+b1 is to be
Your message dated Fri, 01 Dec 2023 16:19:06 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1054497: fixed in haskell-multistate 0.8.0.4-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1054497,
regarding Removal notice: obsolete
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
Processing control commands:
> clone -1 -2
Bug #1054358 [src:haskell-mbox] Removal notice: obsolete
Bug 1054358 cloned as bug 1057215
> reassign -2 ftp.debian.org
Bug #1057215 [src:haskell-mbox] Removal notice: obsolete
Bug reassigned from package 'src:haskell-mbox' to 'ftp.debian.org'.
No longer
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: reassign -2 ftp.debian.org
Control: retitle -2 RM: haskell-ixset -- ROM; obsolete
Control: severity -2 normal
On Sat, Oct 21, 2023 at 08:38PM, Ilias Tsitsimpis wrote:
> I intend to remove this package:
>
> * It has no rev dependencies
> * The current version FTBF
Processing control commands:
> clone -1 -2
Bug #1054319 [src:haskell-ixset] Removal notice: obsolete
Bug 1054319 cloned as bug 1057214
> reassign -2 ftp.debian.org
Bug #1057214 [src:haskell-ixset] Removal notice: obsolete
Bug reassigned from package 'src:haskell-ixset' to 'ftp.debian.org'.
No long
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: reassign -2 ftp.debian.org
Control: retitle -2 RM: haskell-mbox -- ROM; obsolete
Control: severity -2 normal
On Sun, Oct 22, 2023 at 04:33PM, Ilias Tsitsimpis wrote:
> I intend to remove this package:
>
> * It has no rev dependencies
> * The current version FTBFS
Processing control commands:
> clone -1 -2
Bug #1054357 [src:haskell-fclabels] Removal notice: obsolete
Bug 1054357 cloned as bug 1057212
> reassign -2 ftp.debian.org
Bug #1057212 [src:haskell-fclabels] Removal notice: obsolete
Bug reassigned from package 'src:haskell-fclabels' to 'ftp.debian.org'
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: reassign -2 ftp.debian.org
Control: retitle -2 RM: haskell-fclabels -- ROM; obsolete
Control: severity -2 normal
On Sun, Oct 22, 2023 at 04:31PM, Ilias Tsitsimpis wrote:
> I intend to remove this package:
>
> * It has no rev dependencies
> * The current version F
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: reassign -2 ftp.debian.org
Control: retitle -2 RM: haskell-data-tree-print -- ROM; obsolete
Control: severity -2 normal
On Sun, Oct 22, 2023 at 04:28PM, Ilias Tsitsimpis wrote:
> I intend to remove this package:
>
> * It has no rev dependencies
> * The current ve
Processing control commands:
> clone -1 -2
Bug #1054316 [src:haskell-czipwith] Removal notice: obsolete
Bug 1054316 cloned as bug 1057210
> reassign -2 ftp.debian.org
Bug #1057210 [src:haskell-czipwith] Removal notice: obsolete
Bug reassigned from package 'src:haskell-czipwith' to 'ftp.debian.org'
Processing control commands:
> clone -1 -2
Bug #1054356 [src:haskell-data-tree-print] Removal notice: obsolete
Bug 1054356 cloned as bug 1057211
> reassign -2 ftp.debian.org
Bug #1057211 [src:haskell-data-tree-print] Removal notice: obsolete
Bug reassigned from package 'src:haskell-data-tree-print
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: reassign -2 ftp.debian.org
Control: retitle -2 RM: haskell-czipwith -- ROM; obsolete
Control: severity -2 normal
On Sat, Oct 21, 2023 at 08:07PM, Ilias Tsitsimpis wrote:
> I intend to remove this package:
>
> * It has no rev dependencies
> * The current version F
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: reassign -2 ftp.debian.org
Control: retitle -2 RM: haskell-cipher-aes -- ROM; obsolete
Control: severity -2 normal
On Sun, Oct 22, 2023 at 07:19PM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> #1022681 has now been fixed.
Dear FTP masters, please remove haskell-cipher-aes from unstable.
--
Processing control commands:
> clone -1 -2
Bug #1018196 [src:haskell-cipher-aes] Removal notice: obsolete
Bug 1018196 cloned as bug 1057209
No valid blocking bug(s) given; not doing anything
Failed to clone 1018196: Unknown/archived blocking bug(s):1022681.
> reassign -2 ftp.debian.org
Failed to
Processing control commands:
> clone -1 -2
Bug #1018197 [src:haskell-cprng-aes] Removal notice: obsolete
Bug 1018197 cloned as bug 1057208
No valid blocking bug(s) given; not doing anything
Failed to clone 1018197: Unknown/archived blocking bug(s):1022681.
> reassign -2 ftp.debian.org
Failed to c
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: reassign -2 ftp.debian.org
Control: retitle -2 RM: haskell-cprng-aes -- ROM; obsolete
Control: severity -2 normal
On Sun, Oct 22, 2023 at 07:19PM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> #1022681 has now been fixed.
Dear FTP masters, please remove haskell-cprng-aes from unstable.
--
Processing control commands:
> clone -1 -2
Bug #1054498 [src:haskell-butcher] Removal notice: obsolete
Bug 1054498 cloned as bug 1057206
> reassign -2 ftp.debian.org
Bug #1057206 [src:haskell-butcher] Removal notice: obsolete
Bug reassigned from package 'src:haskell-butcher' to 'ftp.debian.org'.
N
Package: systemtap
Version: 5.0-1
Severity: serious
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -DBINDIR='"/usr/bin"' -DSYSCONFDIR='"/etc"'
-DPKGDATADIR='"/usr/share/systemtap"' -DPKGLIBDIR='"/usr/lib/systemtap"'
-DLOCALEDIR='"/usr/share/locale"' -DDOCDIR='"/usr/share/doc/systemtap"'
-DPYEXECDIR='""' -DPY3EXECDIR
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: reassign -2 ftp.debian.org
Control: retitle -2 RM: haskell-butcher -- ROM; obsolete
Control: severity -2 normal
On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 06:30PM, Ilias Tsitsimpis wrote:
> I intend to remove this package:
>
> * It has no rev dependencies
> * The current version FT
Source: r-bioc-rhdf5filters
Version: 1.12.1+dfsg2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-s...@lists.debian.org
Hi Maintainer
A commit on 2023-08-01 [1] added a build-dependency on
libvbz-hdf-plugin-dev, which is not available on big-endian
architectures, and prevents r-bioc-rhdf5fil
Processing control commands:
> clone -1 -2
Bug #1054596 [src:haskell-binary-parsers] Removal notice: obsolete
Bug 1054596 cloned as bug 1057202
> reassign -2 ftp.debian.org
Bug #1057202 [src:haskell-binary-parsers] Removal notice: obsolete
Bug reassigned from package 'src:haskell-binary-parsers' t
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: reassign -2 ftp.debian.org
Control: retitle -2 RM: haskell-binary-parsers -- ROM; obsolete
Control: severity -2 normal
On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 06:16PM, Ilias Tsitsimpis wrote:
> I intend to remove this package:
>
> * It has no rev dependencies
> * The current ver
Your message dated Fri, 01 Dec 2023 14:50:41 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1055418: fixed in systemtap 5.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1055418,
regarding systemtap: autopkgtest regression: Pass 4: compilation failed. [man
error::pass4]
to be marked as done.
This means that y
Your message dated Fri, 01 Dec 2023 13:23:42 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1055416: fixed in nodejs 18.19.0+dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1055416,
regarding nodejs: Testsuite failure in test-crypto-dh since OpenSSL
3.0.12/3.1.4.
to be marked as done.
This means that you c
Your message dated Fri, 01 Dec 2023 13:23:42 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1054690: fixed in nodejs 18.19.0+dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1054690,
regarding nodejs: FTBFS: make[2]: *** [Makefile:526: test-ci-js] Error 1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Fri, 01 Dec 2023 13:23:41 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1030284: fixed in nodejs 18.19.0+dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1030284,
regarding nodejs: [arm64] RangeError: Maximum call stack size exceeded
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
Processing control commands:
> block 1055090 by -1
Bug #1055090 [src:rust-backtrace] rust-backtrace: please update to v0.3.69
1055090 was not blocked by any bugs.
1055090 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 1055090: 1057198
--
1055090: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cg
Package: rust-wasmtime
Version: 15.0.0+dfsg-3
Severity: serious
Control: block 1055090 by -1
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=rust-wasmtime&arch=all&ver=15.0.0%2Bdfsg-3&stamp=1701097543&raw=0
error[E0599]: no function or associated item named `from_str` found for struct
`Triple`
Package: borgbackup2
Version: 2.0.0b5-1
Severity: grave
Tags: newcomer
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
there is a version conflict in the dependencies:
$ apt install borgbackup2
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 1057190 libhackrf0/2023.01.1-4
Bug #1057190 [libhackrf0] libhackrf0: udev rules file lost in upgrade
The source libhackrf0 and version 2023.01.1-4 do not appear to match any binary
packages
Marked as found in versions libhackrf0/2023.01.1-4
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 1056902 RM: libbytelist-java -- ROM; unused, obsolete
Bug #1056902 [libbytelist-java] libbytelist-java: Package is obsolete and
should be removed before trixie release
Changed Bug title to 'RM: libbytelist-java -- ROM; unused, obsolete' f
retitle 1056902 RM: libbytelist-java -- ROM; unused, obsolete
severity 1056902 normal
reassign 1056902 ftp.debian.org
thanks
As title says.
This package was used by JRuby but is obsolete nowadays.
All packages in the archive depending on this were migrated or removed,
so there is no more reason
Your message dated Fri, 01 Dec 2023 11:04:16 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1052632: fixed in clevis 19-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #1052632,
regarding clevis FTBFS when systemd.pc changes systemdsystemunitdir
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 542095 + wontfix
Bug #542095 {Done: Jeremy Bícha } [gnome] should
not depend on network-manager-gnome
Added tag(s) wontfix.
> notfixed 542095 1:2.26+1
Bug #542095 {Done: Jeremy Bícha } [gnome] should
not depend on network-manager-gnome
No l
Hi Mark,
On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 08:22:33PM +, Mark Hindley wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 10:27:41AM +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> > Package: initscripts
> > Version: 3.08-3~bpo12+1
> > Severity: serious
> > User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> > Usertags: fileconflict
> > Control: affects -1
Package: libhackrf0
Version: 2023.01.1-2
Severity: grave
Justification: file loss during upgrade
User: helm...@debian.org
Usertags: dep17p7
X-Debbugs-Cc: z...@debian.org
Hi,
upgrading libhackrf0 can loose files. Reproducer:
mmdebstrap trixie /dev/null --architectures amd64,i386
--include=libhac
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 1056548
Bug #1056548 [src:ticketbooth] ticketbooth: FTBFS: Test "Validate appstream
file" failed
Marked Bug as done
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1056548: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/b
close 1056548
thanks
fixed 1056548 1.0.3.1-2
thanks
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> fixed 1056548 1.0.3.1-2
Bug #1056548 [src:ticketbooth] ticketbooth: FTBFS: Test "Validate appstream
file" failed
Marked as fixed in versions ticketbooth/1.0.3.1-2.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
74 matches
Mail list logo
