Package: dhcpcd-base
Version: 9.4.1-24~deb12u2
Severity: serious
Justification: file loss during upgrade
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-rele...@lists.debian.org
User: helm...@debian.org
Usertags: dep17p1
Unfortunately, the stable update of dhcpcd5 introduced a regression
relevant to upgrades from bullseye.
Your message dated Sat, 07 Oct 2023 21:55:20 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#986740: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #982034,
regarding forked-daapd: autopkgtest regression in testing: Job for
forked-daapd.service failed.
to be marked as done.
This me
Your message dated Sat, 07 Oct 2023 21:54:50 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1053534: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #957758,
regarding restbed: ftbfs with GCC-10
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Sat, 07 Oct 2023 21:55:47 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#960425: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1031173,
regarding arcanist-clang-format-linter: prevents arcanist tool from working
(PHP Fatal error: Uncaught Error)
to be marked as
Your message dated Sat, 07 Oct 2023 21:55:20 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#986740: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1004626,
regarding forked-daapd: FTBFS with ffmpeg 5.0
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Sat, 07 Oct 2023 21:52:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1053376: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1052768,
regarding lttnganalyses: FTBFS: AssertionError: '20:57:08.123456789' !=
'16:57:08.123456789'
to be marked as done.
This mea
Your message dated Sat, 07 Oct 2023 21:47:02 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1053315: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1052836,
regarding firmware-tomu: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies:
libstdc++-arm-none-eabi-dev (= 15:12.2.rel1-1+23), gcc-arm
Your message dated Sat, 07 Oct 2023 21:44:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1053268: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1052960,
regarding pgaudit-1.7: FTBFS: make: *** [debian/rules:10: clean] Error 1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim tha
Your message dated Sat, 07 Oct 2023 21:38:55 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1053152: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1052876,
regarding bless: FTBFS: ../tests/meson.build:5:4: ERROR: Problem encountered:
nunit not found, cannot build tests. You can d
Your message dated Sat, 07 Oct 2023 21:32:50 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1052295: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1052237,
regarding FTBFS with OCaml 4.14.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If t
Your message dated Sat, 07 Oct 2023 21:31:26 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1052258: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #995847,
regarding paulstretch: Program crashes on Play or Render Selection - for debian
Bullseye and Bookworm
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Sat, 07 Oct 2023 21:32:23 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1052294: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1052236,
regarding FTBFS with OCaml 4.14.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If t
Your message dated Sat, 07 Oct 2023 21:31:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1052293: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1052231,
regarding FTBFS with OCaml 4.14.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If t
Your message dated Sat, 07 Oct 2023 21:29:04 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1052167: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1052165,
regarding foo-yc20: Terminates directly
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
Your message dated Sat, 07 Oct 2023 21:21:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1052478: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #965451,
regarding cernlib: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim t
Your message dated Sat, 07 Oct 2023 21:21:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1052478: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #957080,
regarding cernlib: ftbfs with GCC-10
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Sat, 07 Oct 2023 21:21:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1052478: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1023171,
regarding cernlib: unsatisfiable dependency on geant321-doc
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Sat, 07 Oct 2023 21:20:27 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1051708: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #965715,
regarding mclibs: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim th
Your message dated Sat, 07 Oct 2023 21:20:27 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1051708: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #957522,
regarding mclibs: ftbfs with GCC-10
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Sat, 07 Oct 2023 21:18:20 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1052242: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1043383,
regarding python-pcre: depends on obsolete pcre3 library
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 1053259 1.18.4-3
Bug #1053259 [src:gst-plugins-bad1.0] gst-plugins-bad1.0: CVE-2023-40476
Marked as found in versions gst-plugins-bad1.0/1.18.4-3.
> found 1053260 1.18.4-3
Bug #1053260 [src:gst-plugins-bad1.0] gst-plugins-bad1.0: CVE-2023-40
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 1053259 1.22.0-4
Bug #1053259 [src:gst-plugins-bad1.0] gst-plugins-bad1.0: CVE-2023-40476
Marked as found in versions gst-plugins-bad1.0/1.22.0-4.
> found 1053260 1.22.0-4
Bug #1053260 [src:gst-plugins-bad1.0] gst-plugins-bad1.0: CVE-2023-40
It has no reverse dependencies and is one of the last things keeping
rust-time-0.1 in Debian.
Not speaking for or against removal, but updating it to the latest
version would get rid of the dependency on time 0.1.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 1053259 with 1052660
Bug #1053259 [src:gst-plugins-bad1.0] gst-plugins-bad1.0: CVE-2023-40476
1053259 was not blocked by any bugs.
1053259 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 1053259: 1052660
> block 1053260 with 1052660
Bug
Your message dated Sat, 07 Oct 2023 18:19:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1053570: fixed in haskell-config-value 0.8.3-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1053570,
regarding haskell-config-value FTBFS with alex 3.3.0.0
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Sat, 07 Oct 2023 18:19:39 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1052486: fixed in jpeg-xl 0.7.0-10.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1052486,
regarding jpeg-xl: FTBFS with libwebp 1.3.2: Use static libwebp library without
linking libsharpyuv
to be marked as done.
This m
Your message dated Sat, 07 Oct 2023 17:49:29 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1041332: fixed in mrtg 2.17.10-5+deb12u2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1041332,
regarding mrtg: modifies conffiles (policy 10.7.3): /etc/mrtg/mrtg.cfg
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that t
Your message dated Sat, 07 Oct 2023 17:47:21 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1053142: fixed in chromium 117.0.5938.132-1~deb12u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1053142,
regarding chromium cannot startup after libfreetype6 upgrade to
2.12.1+dfsg-5+deb12u1
to be marked as done.
This
Source: rust-pbr
Version: 1.0.1-1
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-CC: and...@shadura.me
Can we remove rust-pbr from Debian?
It has no reverse dependencies and is one of the last things keeping
rust-time-0.1 in Debian.
Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1053536 ftbfs sid trixie
Bug #1053536 [squeekboard] squeekboard FTBFS with version 0.18 of rust gtk
stack.
Added tag(s) sid, trixie, and ftbfs.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
105353
Hi,
On Sat, 7 Oct 2023, at 17:39, Jeremy Bícha wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 7, 2023 at 11:32 AM Andrej Shadura wrote:
>> Debos uses libslirp in some modes of operation.
>
> How would I be able to find dependencies like this? Before removing packages?
$ apt rdepends libslirp-helper
libslirp-helper
Revers
Source: haskell-yi-core
Version: 0.19.2-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: ftbfs
Forwarded: https://github.com/yi-editor/yi/issues/1133
This package FTBFS with the latest version of haskell-unix-compat, which
is part of Stackage LTS 21 and available in Debian unstable.
--
Ilias
On Sat, Oct 7, 2023 at 11:32 AM Andrej Shadura wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Oct 2023, at 17:20, Jeremy Bícha wrote:
> > rust-libslirp has no reverse dependencies in Debian.
>
> Debos uses libslirp in some modes of operation.
How would I be able to find dependencies like this? Before removing packages?
Tha
Hi,
On Sat, 7 Oct 2023, at 17:36, Peter Green wrote:
> We discussed this on irc a while back, and apparently the package is important
> to debos. Though the package relationship is only a "suggests".
Because it’s needed in the UML mode, but UML is not the main mode of operation.
UML is in Sugges
rust-libslirp has no reverse dependencies in Debian.
https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=path%3Adebian%2Fcontrol+rust-libslirp&perpkg=1
It is also one of the blockers for removing the old rust-zbus-1 from
Debian. See https://bugs.debian.org/1053631
Can we remove rust-libslirp and rust-libsli
Control: tag 1053632 wontfix
On Sat, 7 Oct 2023, at 17:20, Jeremy Bícha wrote:
> rust-libslirp has no reverse dependencies in Debian.
Debos uses libslirp in some modes of operation.
Your message dated Sat, 07 Oct 2023 17:31:42 +0200
with message-id <088fa39f-289e-4d8f-bd83-764d67ca7...@app.fastmail.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#1053632: rust-libslirp: Remove from Debian?
has caused the Debian Bug report #1053632,
regarding rust-libslirp: Remove from Debian?
to be marked as don
Processing control commands:
> tag 1053632 wontfix
Bug #1053632 [src:rust-libslirp] rust-libslirp: Remove from Debian?
Added tag(s) wontfix.
--
1053632: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1053632
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Source: rust-libslirp
Version: 4.3.0-4
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-CC: andre...@debian.org
Control: affects -1 src:rust-libslirp-sys
rust-libslirp has no reverse dependencies in Debian.
https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=path%3Adebian%2Fcontrol+rust-libslirp&perpkg=1
It is also one of the bl
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 src:rust-libslirp-sys
Bug #1053632 [src:rust-libslirp] rust-libslirp: Remove from Debian?
Added indication that 1053632 affects src:rust-libslirp-sys
--
1053632: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1053632
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Package: flask-dance
Version: 6.2.0.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: rc policy - "packages must be buildable within the same release".
Tags: trixie, sid
flask-dance build-depends on python3-sphinxcontrib.seqdiag which is not in
testing,
it was removed because it FTBFS and was badly broken, b
Moin
On Sun, Sep 24, 2023 at 03:01:51PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> ## Kernel modules will be signed with an ephemeral key
This is now
https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux/-/merge_requests/607.
> ## Image packages contains more version info
>
> Example: linux-image-6.5.3-cloud-arm64
>
Your message dated Sat, 07 Oct 2023 14:42:52 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1038145: fixed in cgreen 1.6.3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1038145,
regarding cgreen: FTBFS on s390x
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Source: rust-extprim
Version: 1.7.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: trixie sid
X-Debbugs-CC: sylves...@debian.org
rust-extprim has no reverse dependencies. Should we remove it from Debian?
This was proposed here:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-rust/2022/10/msg0.html
Dropping the old semver depend
Source: python-aiortc
Version: 1.4.0-2
Followup-For: Bug #1042123
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
I just rebuild the package with normal python3-aioice but it seems it
works. So am I missing something here?
--
Regards,
--
Bo YU
diff -Nru python-aiortc-1.4.0/debian/changelog
python-aiortc-1.4.0
Your message dated Sat, 07 Oct 2023 13:49:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1053612: fixed in driftnet 1.5.0-0.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1053612,
regarding driftnet: FTBFS on s390x
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
I am uploading a NMU to fix this.
The debdiff is attached.diff -Nru driftnet-1.5.0/debian/changelog driftnet-1.5.0/debian/changelog
--- driftnet-1.5.0/debian/changelog 2023-09-22 22:35:48.0 +0200
+++ driftnet-1.5.0/debian/changelog 2023-10-07 15:31:13.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,11
Source: driftnet
Version: 1.5.0-0.1
Severity: serious
My NMU does not build on s390x. I have created a fix at
https://github.com/deiv/driftnet/pull/50
Hi Rafael,
Le samedi 07 octobre 2023 à 14:15 +0200, Rafael Laboissière a écrit :
> I have a question for the Debian Octave Group, related to Bug#1052973,
> which has been fixed in version 8.3.0-3 of octave-dev. This bug was
> preventing the building of the octave-image package. Should we include
Hi,
I have a question for the Debian Octave Group, related to Bug#1052973,
which has been fixed in version 8.3.0-3 of octave-dev. This bug was
preventing the building of the octave-image package. Should we include
octave-dev >= 8.3.0-3 in Build-Depends of the otave-image package ?
Best,
Raf
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> affects 1053405 = src:darktable
Bug #1053405 [src:gcc-13] darktable: FTBFS on arm64 (gcc bug?)
Removed indication that 1053405 affects src:darktable.
Added indication that 1053405 affects src:darktable
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please co
51 matches
Mail list logo
