Control: severity -1 normal
Hi Matthew,
On Tue, 6 Jun 2023 19:43:34 +0100 Matthew Lemon wrote:
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/usr/bin/vit", line 33, in
> sys.exit(load_entry_point('vit==2.2.0', 'console_scripts', 'vit')())
>
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 normal
Bug #1037165 [vit] vit: Python TypeError: 'str' object does not support item
assignment
Severity set to 'normal' from 'grave'
--
1037165: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1037165
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.deb
Hi!
Note that upstream released 10.11.4 today. Import preparation in
progress at
https://salsa.debian.org/mariadb-team/mariadb-server/-/merge_requests/50.
I plan to upload this to experimental tomorrow and eventually into
bookworm-pu if the release team approves.
- Otto
No, please go ahead and do both: my availability is spotty for the next 18
hours. :)
(on mobile)
Utkarsh Gupta wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 9:01 PM Chris Lamb wrote:
>> I see your 2.5.5-3+deb10u6 update on the debian/buster branch which
>> fixes the broken +deb10u5 upload,
Your message dated Wed, 7 Jun 2023 23:04:20 +0100
with message-id
and subject line
has caused the Debian Bug report #998288,
regarding node-clipanion: FTBFS: Cannot find type definition file for 'yup'.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Hi Chris,
On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 9:01 PM Chris Lamb wrote:
> I see your 2.5.5-3+deb10u6 update on the debian/buster branch which
> fixes the broken +deb10u5 upload, but I don't see it in the archive
> yet.
>
> Although you mentioned you were going to wait a bit more, I'm just
> 100%-checking you
Hi Bernhard, Kees,
On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 6:58 PM Schmidt, Bernhard
wrote:
> > I've prepared a fix for the regression and uploaded the binaries at:
> > https://people.debian.org/~utkarsh/lts/ruby2.5/
> >
> > Can you please give these a try and see if that fixes the regression
> > you're seeing?
>
Package: awstats
Version: 7.8-3
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed the piuparts
upgrade test because dpkg detected a conffile as being modified and then
prompted the user for an action. As there is no
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Control: found -1 0.18.1-1
thanks
This confirmation also applies to the severity of the issue :-( that
slipped itself in in March 2023 with 0.18.1-1. dh_installsysusers is not
called by the normal dh sequence in dh compat level 13 which leads to
the user not being creat
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #1037171 [aide] aide: fresh aide package install fails to add the requried
_aide user to system
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1037171 to the same tags previously set
> found -1 0.18.1-1
Bug #1037171 [aide] aide: fresh aide package inst
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #1037171 [aide] aide: fresh aide package install fails to add the requried
_aide user to system
Added tag(s) confirmed.
> found -1 0.18.1-1
Bug #1037171 [aide] aide: fresh aide package install fails to add the requried
_aide user to system
Mar
On Wed, 7 Jun 2023 18:47:02 +0530 Utkarsh Gupta
wrote:> I've prepared a fix for the
regression and uploaded the binaries at:
https://people.debian.org/~utkarsh/lts/ruby2.5/
Can you please give these a try and see if that fixes the regression
you're seeing?
These packages also fix the Puppet
Control: tag -1 patch pending
Cyril Brulebois (2023-05-27):
> For the record, those archives end up being published in locations like
> the following, and I definitely expected those to match the firmware
> packages getting shipped into the images, not be some kind of snapshot of
> what's in unst
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 patch pending
Bug #1036828 [debian-cd] debian-cd: wrong firmware archives built and published
for D-I releases?
Added tag(s) pending and patch.
--
1036828: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1036828
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bu
Utkarsh,
> I had missed your comment in the bug but super, many thanks for
> testing this out! I'll wait a bit more before I roll this out.
I see your 2.5.5-3+deb10u6 update on the debian/buster branch which
fixes the broken +deb10u5 upload, but I don't see it in the archive
yet.
Although you me
Hi Andreas,
This is an unexpected bug report.
On Wed, 7 Jun 2023 at 09:39, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Package: unixodbc-common,odbcinst
> Version: 2.3.11-2
> Severity: serious
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: piuparts
> Control: affects -1 + libsqliteodbc
>
> Hi,
>
> during a test w
Am Mittwoch, dem 07.06.2023 um 18:47 +0530 schrieb Utkarsh Gupta:
Hi,
> > Yep, I'm taking a look to prep something for 2.5.
>
> I've prepared a fix for the regression and uploaded the binaries at:
> https://people.debian.org/~utkarsh/lts/ruby2.5/
>
> Can you please give these a try and see if t
Hi Kees,
On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 6:53 PM Kees Meijs | Nefos wrote:
> I know you were asking Bernhard, but I downloaded and installed as well.
> Our Puppet agent seems to be happy again.
I had missed your comment in the bug but super, many thanks for
testing this out! I'll wait a bit more before I
Hi Utkarsh,
Many thanks from our end.
I know you were asking Bernhard, but I downloaded and installed as well.
Our Puppet agent seems to be happy again.
Cheers,
Kees
On 07-06-2023 15:17, Utkarsh Gupta wrote:
I've prepared a fix for the regression and uploaded the binaries at:
https://people
Hi Bernhard,
On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 4:16 PM Utkarsh Gupta wrote:
> Yep, I'm taking a look to prep something for 2.5.
I've prepared a fix for the regression and uploaded the binaries at:
https://people.debian.org/~utkarsh/lts/ruby2.5/
Can you please give these a try and see if that fixes the reg
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 1037190 wishlist
Bug #1037190 [dhcpcd] dhcpcd: version is lower than in wheezy
Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'serious'
> done
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact
On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 3:09 PM Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>
> Package: dhcpcd
> Version: 9.4.1-22
> Severity: serious
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: piuparts
>
> wheezy had a dhcpcd binary package built from src:dhcpcd at version
> 1:3.2.3-11+deb7u1 while bookworm has one built from s
Package: sd
Version: 0.7.6-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
squeeze had a sd binary package built from (unrelated) src:sd at
version 0.74-1 while bookworm has one built from src:rust-sd at
version 0.7.6-1 which is lower, violating the archive property of
mono
Package: dhcpcd
Version: 9.4.1-22
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
wheezy had a dhcpcd binary package built from src:dhcpcd at version
1:3.2.3-11+deb7u1 while bookworm has one built from src:dhcpcd5 at
version 9.4.1-22 which is lower, violating the archive prop
FWIW, in Ubuntu, we had a similar issue trying to fix this CVE in ruby2.7,
and in the end we reverted the fix:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ruby2.7/2.7.0-5ubuntu1.10
Lucas Kanashiro.
Em qua., 7 de jun. de 2023 07:47, Utkarsh Gupta
escreveu:
> Hiya,
>
> On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 2:39 PM Mo
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:git
Bug #1037188 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package git/2.30.2-1+deb11u3
Added indication that 1037188 affects src:git
> block 987264 with -1
Bug #987264 {Done: Jonathan Nieder } [src:git] git-el:
fails to install with xemacs21
987264 was not
Processing control commands:
> block 996878 with -1
Bug #996878 {Done: Thomas Andrejak }
[python3-prelude] python3-prelude: python3 import prelude throws an ImportError
exception
996878 was not blocked by any bugs.
996878 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 996878: 1037187
> affe
Hiya,
On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 2:39 PM Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Specifically
> https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2023/03/28/redos-in-uri-cve-2023-28755/
> states:
>
> | For Ruby 2.7: Update to uri 0.10.0.1
> | For Ruby 3.0: Update to uri 0.10.2
> | For Ruby 3.1: Update to uri 0.11.1
> | For Rub
Hi there,
In our stack I see the exact same issue.
Cheers,
Kees
On 07-06-2023 11:09, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
It's definitely related to the fix for CVE-2023-28755, reverting that patch
unbreaks Puppet. I'd recommend to go ahead with a revert for now.
On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 01:43:26PM +0530, Utkarsh Gupta wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 12:56 PM Salvatore Bonaccorso
> wrote:
> > Can you please have a look, as this seems to be caused by the DLA
> > issued as DLA-3447-1.
>
> This has been caused by the ruby2.5 update.
It's defi
Hi Chris,
On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 12:56 PM Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Can you please have a look, as this seems to be caused by the DLA
> issued as DLA-3447-1.
This has been caused by the ruby2.5 update. Can you please TAL? This
is perhaps because of the URI version in buster v/s URI version
u
Hi LTS team,
On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 08:44:53AM +0200, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
> Package: libruby2.5
> Version: 2.5.5-3+deb10u5
> Severity: grave
>
> Hi,
>
> I can't quite figure out why, but the latest security upload of ruby2.5 in
> Buster breaks the ability of the puppet agent to pull files f
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> affects 1037178 puppet
Bug #1037178 [libruby2.5] puppet does not sync files anymore after recent
ruby2.5 security upload
Added indication that 1037178 affects puppet
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
33 matches
Mail list logo
