Bug#1031681: libkiwix: bump B-D to libzim-dev (>= 8.1.0+really8.1.0)

On Wed, 22 Feb 2023 01:56:47 +0100 Andreas Beckmann wrote: Followup-For: Bug #1031681 src:kiwix-tools probably needs the same B-D bump. Andreas Now, we have libzim 8.1.1. Therefore this should be fixed. -- Kiwix - Wikipedia Offline & more * Web: https://kiwix.org/ * Mastodon: https://mas

Bug#1018718: marked as pending in apache2

On 4/2/23 07:56, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: Hey. Thanks for the fix. Am I right that this *generally* does not longer enable apache2- doc.conf per default (i.e. also on fresh installs)? Hi, yes you're right Causes that would also make it fix #977014. Sure, thanks for the link I saw

Bug#1033821: marked as done (node-sockjs-client: autopkgtest regression: expected 1006 to equal 1000)

Your message dated Mon, 03 Apr 2023 06:33:53 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1033821: fixed in node-sockjs-client 1.6.1+dfsg1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1033821, regarding node-sockjs-client: autopkgtest regression: expected 1006 to equal 1000 to be marked as done. This means

Bug#1033426: Cannot reproduce

Hi, I couldn't reproduce the issue when building locally. I'm therefore lowering severity to important until I know more. Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo)

Processed: Bug#1033821 marked as pending in node-sockjs-client

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1033821 [src:node-sockjs-client] node-sockjs-client: autopkgtest regression: expected 1006 to equal 1000 Added tag(s) pending. -- 1033821: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1033821 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.d

Bug#1033821: marked as pending in node-sockjs-client

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1033821 in node-sockjs-client reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-sockjs-client/-/commit/f600606e11

Bug#1033816: marked as done (node-interpret: autopkgtest regression: Unable to use specified module loaders for ".babel.js".)

Your message dated Mon, 03 Apr 2023 04:33:57 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1033816: fixed in node-interpret 2.2.0-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1033816, regarding node-interpret: autopkgtest regression: Unable to use specified module loaders for ".babel.js". to be marked as don

Bug#1033816: marked as pending in node-interpret

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1033816 in node-interpret reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-interpret/-/commit/e3c2f217fee13a70bd

Processed: Bug#1033816 marked as pending in node-interpret

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1033816 [src:node-interpret] node-interpret: autopkgtest regression: Unable to use specified module loaders for ".babel.js". Added tag(s) pending. -- 1033816: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1033816 Debian Bug Tracking System

Bug#1033833: unknown-horizons: Fails to start Couldn't open content/fonts/Unifont.ttf

On Sun, 2 Apr 2023 18:33:34 +0200 Tobias Frost wrote: > it seems so that the fonts package unifont dropped unifont.ttf in > 1:15.0.01-1: Yes, and upstream plans to drop ttf. So I do not want to revert this change in Debian package. > Unifont 15.0.01 installs OpenType fonts alongside the TrueTy

Processed: Re: Bug#1033115: golang-github-go-macaron-csrf: CVE-2018-25060

Processing control commands: > clone -1 -2 Bug #1033115 [src:golang-github-go-macaron-csrf] golang-github-go-macaron-csrf: CVE-2018-25060 Bug 1033115 cloned as bug 1033865 > retitle -2 Don't release with bookworm Bug #1033865 [src:golang-github-go-macaron-csrf] golang-github-go-macaron-csrf: CVE

Processed: Re: Bug#1033753: golang-github-crewjam-saml: CVE-2023-28119

Processing control commands: > clone -1 -2 Bug #1033753 [src:golang-github-crewjam-saml] golang-github-crewjam-saml: CVE-2023-28119 Bug 1033753 cloned as bug 1033864 > retitle -2 Don't release with bookworm Bug #1033864 [src:golang-github-crewjam-saml] golang-github-crewjam-saml: CVE-2023-28119

Bug#1033753: golang-github-crewjam-saml: CVE-2023-28119

Control: clone -1 -2 Control: retitle -2 Don't release with bookworm Control: submitter -2 ! Control: severity -2 serious On Sat, Apr 1, 2023 at 2:48 AM Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > Source: golang-github-crewjam-saml > Version: 0.4.12-2 > Severity: grave > Tags: security upstream > Justificati

Bug#1033818: marked as done (node-nock: autopkgtest regression: Accessing Object.prototype.__proto__ has been disallowed)

Your message dated Mon, 03 Apr 2023 04:05:13 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1033818: fixed in node-sinon 14.0.2+ds+~cs74.13.25-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1033818, regarding node-nock: autopkgtest regression: Accessing Object.prototype.__proto__ has been disallowed to be marke

Bug#1033819: marked as done (node-prosemirror-schema-list: autopkgtest regression: Accessing Object.prototype.__proto__ has been disallowed with --disable-proto=throw)

Your message dated Mon, 03 Apr 2023 04:04:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1033819: fixed in node-prosemirror-transform 1.2.8-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #1033819, regarding node-prosemirror-schema-list: autopkgtest regression: Accessing Object.prototype.__proto__ has been dis

Bug#1033818: marked as pending in node-sinon

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1033818 in node-sinon reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-sinon/-/commit/834bfa7eeff16107a82e9a00b3

Processed: Bug#1033819 marked as pending in node-prosemirror-transform

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1033819 [node-prosemirror-transform] node-prosemirror-schema-list: autopkgtest regression: Accessing Object.prototype.__proto__ has been disallowed with --disable-proto=throw Added tag(s) pending. -- 1033819: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bu

Processed: Bug#1033818 marked as pending in node-sinon

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1033818 [node-sinon] node-nock: autopkgtest regression: Accessing Object.prototype.__proto__ has been disallowed Added tag(s) pending. -- 1033818: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1033818 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow..

Bug#1033819: marked as pending in node-prosemirror-transform

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1033819 in node-prosemirror-transform reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-prosemirror-transform/-/c

Bug#1033820: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#1033820: node-snapdragon: autopkgtest regression: Cannot find module 'snapdragon-node'

Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On 4/2/23 12:05, Paul Gevers wrote: Source: node-snapdragon Version: 0.12.1+~cs1.2.1-2 Control: found -1 0.12.1+~cs1.2.1-1 Severity: serious Control: tags -1 bookworm-ignore User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: regression Dear maintainer(s), Your package has a

Processed: Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#1033820: node-snapdragon: autopkgtest regression: Cannot find module 'snapdragon-node'

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + moreinfo Bug #1033820 [src:node-snapdragon] node-snapdragon: autopkgtest regression: Cannot find module 'snapdragon-node' Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 1033820: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1033820 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow..

Processed: reassign 1033818 to node-sinon, affects 1033818

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 1033818 node-sinon Bug #1033818 [src:node-nock] node-nock: autopkgtest regression: Accessing Object.prototype.__proto__ has been disallowed Bug reassigned from package 'src:node-nock' to 'node-sinon'. No longer marked as found in version

Processed: reassign 1033819 to node-prosemirror-transform, affects 1033819

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 1033819 node-prosemirror-transform Bug #1033819 [src:node-prosemirror-schema-list] node-prosemirror-schema-list: autopkgtest regression: Accessing Object.prototype.__proto__ has been disallowed with --disable-proto=throw Bug reassigned

Bug#1033607: [Pkg-sogo-maintainers] Bug#1033607: sogo: /usr/bin/sogo linked against wrong version of libgnustep-base

Thanks Jeroen, I've looped through all the libraries used by `sogod` and it seems like `libsope1` is the culprit. A lot of libraries in that package are linked to libgnustep-base.so.1.24, despite the package requiring 1.27: $ objdump -p /usr/local/lib/libSaxObjC.so.4.9 |grep NEEDED NEEDED

Bug#1033862: nouveau: watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 548s! [kscreenlocker_g:19260]

Package: src:linux Version: 6.1.20-1 Severity: critical File: nouveau Justification: breaks the whole system X-Debbugs-Cc: af...@comcast.net When the above message occurs, the system becomes totally unresponsive and the only way to recover is a hard power-off via the power button held for about 5

Processed: forwarded

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 1033851 https://github.com/rhattersley/pyepsg/issues/22 Bug #1033851 [src:python-pyepsg] python-pyepsg: autopkgtest regression: xml.etree.ElementTree.ParseError: not well-formed (invalid token) Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://

Bug#1033850: marked as done (python-docx: autopkgtest regression: No module named 'pyparsing')

Your message dated Sun, 02 Apr 2023 20:49:15 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1033850: fixed in python-docx 0.8.11+dfsg1-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #1033850, regarding python-docx: autopkgtest regression: No module named 'pyparsing' to be marked as done. This means that you clai

Processed: Bug#1033850 marked as pending in python-docx

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1033850 [src:python-docx] python-docx: autopkgtest regression: No module named 'pyparsing' Added tag(s) pending. -- 1033850: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1033850 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with

Bug#1033850: marked as pending in python-docx

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1033850 in python-docx reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/python-docx/-/commit/ac5dc59abfe

Processed: Re: Bug#1033845: u-boot fails to boot on pinebook pro if installed on internal emmc

Processing control commands: > severity 1033845 important Bug #1033845 [u-boot-rockchip] u-boot fails to boot on pinebook pro if installed on internal emmc Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' -- 1033845: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1033845 Debian Bug Tracking System

Bug#1033845: u-boot fails to boot on pinebook pro if installed on internal emmc

Control: severity 1033845 important Given that this only affects a single platform, and there are other tested working boot options for this platform, I am downgrading the severity to important. On 2023-04-02, Wolf wrote: > If the u-boot is installed on the internal emmc then u-boot is failing as

Bug#1033857: ruby-chromedriver-helper: autopkgtest regression: cannot load such file -- zip (LoadError)

Source: ruby-chromedriver-helper Version: 2.1.0-7 Severity: serious Control: tags -1 bookworm-ignore User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: regression Dear maintainer(s), Your package has an autopkgtest, great. However, it fails since January 2022. Can you please investigate the situation a

Processed: ruby-chromedriver-helper: autopkgtest regression: cannot load such file -- zip (LoadError)

Processing control commands: > tags -1 bookworm-ignore Bug #1033857 [src:ruby-chromedriver-helper] ruby-chromedriver-helper: autopkgtest regression: cannot load such file -- zip (LoadError) Added tag(s) bookworm-ignore. -- 1033857: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1033857 Debia

Processed: Re 1025045: r-bioc-structuralvariantannotation: Test failures in autopkgtest

Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #1025045 [src:r-bioc-structuralvariantannotation] r-bioc-structuralvariantannotation: Test failures in autopkgtest Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' > tags -1 bookworm-ignore Bug #1025045 [src:r-bioc-structuralvariantannotation] r-bioc

Processed: r-bioc-rwikipathways: autopkgtest regression: get WP2338 Xrefs

Processing control commands: > tags -1 bookworm-ignore Bug #1033855 [src:r-bioc-rwikipathways] r-bioc-rwikipathways: autopkgtest regression: get WP2338 Xrefs Added tag(s) bookworm-ignore. -- 1033855: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1033855 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow

Bug#1033855: r-bioc-rwikipathways: autopkgtest regression: get WP2338 Xrefs

Source: r-bioc-rwikipathways Version: 1.18.0+dfsg-1 Severity: serious Control: tags -1 bookworm-ignore User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: regression Dear maintainer(s), Your package has an autopkgtest, great. However, it fails since February 2023. Can you please investigate the situatio

Processed: r-bioc-rhdf5lib: autopkgtest regression: Expected '1.10.7', got '1.10.8'

Processing control commands: > tags -1 bookworm-ignore Bug #1033854 [src:r-bioc-rhdf5lib] r-bioc-rhdf5lib: autopkgtest regression: Expected '1.10.7', got '1.10.8' Added tag(s) bookworm-ignore. -- 1033854: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1033854 Debian Bug Tracking System Conta

Bug#1033854: r-bioc-rhdf5lib: autopkgtest regression: Expected '1.10.7', got '1.10.8'

Source: r-bioc-rhdf5lib Version: 1.20.0+dfsg-1 Severity: serious Control: tags -1 bookworm-ignore User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: regression Dear maintainer(s), Your package has an autopkgtest, great. However, it fails since around October 2022. Can you please investigate the situati

Bug#1033853: r-bioc-megadepth: autopkgtest regression: different output

Source: r-bioc-megadepth Version: 1.8.0+ds-1 Severity: serious Control: tags -1 bookworm-ignore User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: regression Dear maintainer(s), Your package has an autopkgtest, great. However, it fails in testing since March 2023. Can you please investigate the situati

Processed: r-bioc-megadepth: autopkgtest regression: different output

Processing control commands: > tags -1 bookworm-ignore Bug #1033853 [src:r-bioc-megadepth] r-bioc-megadepth: autopkgtest regression: different output Added tag(s) bookworm-ignore. -- 1033853: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1033853 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs

Bug#1033852: racket-mode: autopkgtest regression: Process *Racket REPL* connection broken by remote peer

Source: racket-mode Version: 20210916git0-2 Severity: serious Control: tags -1 bookworm-ignore User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: regression Dear maintainer(s), Your package has an autopkgtest, great. However, it fails since December 2022 in testing. Can you please investigate the situa

Processed: racket-mode: autopkgtest regression: Process *Racket REPL* connection broken by remote peer

Processing control commands: > tags -1 bookworm-ignore Bug #1033852 [src:racket-mode] racket-mode: autopkgtest regression: Process *Racket REPL* connection broken by remote peer Added tag(s) bookworm-ignore. -- 1033852: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1033852 Debian Bug Tracki

Bug#1033851: python-pyepsg: autopkgtest regression: xml.etree.ElementTree.ParseError: not well-formed (invalid token)

Source: python-pyepsg Version: 0.4.0-1 Severity: serious Control: tags -1 bookworm-ignore User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: regression Dear maintainer(s), Your package has an autopkgtest, great. However, it fails since about August 2022. Can you please investigate the situation and fix

Processed: python-pyepsg: autopkgtest regression: xml.etree.ElementTree.ParseError: not well-formed (invalid token)

Processing control commands: > tags -1 bookworm-ignore Bug #1033851 [src:python-pyepsg] python-pyepsg: autopkgtest regression: xml.etree.ElementTree.ParseError: not well-formed (invalid token) Added tag(s) bookworm-ignore. -- 1033851: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1033851 De

Bug#1033850: python-docx: autopkgtest regression: No module named 'pyparsing'

Source: python-docx Version: 0.8.11+dfsg1-4 Severity: serious Control: tags -1 bookworm-ignore User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: regression Dear maintainer(s), Your package has an autopkgtest, great. However, it fails since January 2023. Can you please investigate the situation and fix

Processed: python-docx: autopkgtest regression: No module named 'pyparsing'

Processing control commands: > tags -1 bookworm-ignore Bug #1033850 [src:python-docx] python-docx: autopkgtest regression: No module named 'pyparsing' Added tag(s) bookworm-ignore. -- 1033850: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1033850 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bug

Bug#1033824: marked as done (passwordsafe: autopkgtest regression: test dependencies transitioned)

Your message dated Sun, 02 Apr 2023 19:19:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1033824: fixed in passwordsafe 1.16.0+dfsg-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1033824, regarding passwordsafe: autopkgtest regression: test dependencies transitioned to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#1033806: marked as done (libntru: autopkgtest regression: undefined reference)

Your message dated Sun, 02 Apr 2023 19:18:52 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1033806: fixed in libntru 0.5-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1033806, regarding libntru: autopkgtest regression: undefined reference to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has be

Bug#1033806: libntru: autopkgtest regression: undefined reference

Hi Paul, On 02-04-2023 19:35, Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu) wrote: I fixed this bug. The debdiff is as attachment. It is quite easy to fix. It is not related to the library but just the test itself. Should I upload it? Sounds like a plan. As libntru isn't a key package, a passing autopkgtest wil

Bug#1033845: u-boot fails to boot on pinebook pro if installed on internal emmc

Package: u-boot-rockchip Version: 2023.01+dfsg-2 Severity: serious Tags: patch X-Debbugs-Cc: lxde...@zirdeon.com If the u-boot is installed on the internal emmc then u-boot is failing as follows: U-Boot SPL 2023.01+dfsg-2 (Jan 18 2023 - 01:57:16 +) Trying to boot from MMC1 mmc fail to send sto

Bug#1033806: libntru: autopkgtest regression: undefined reference

Hi Paul I fixed this bug. The debdiff is as attachment. It is quite easy to fix. It is not related to the library but just the test itself. Should I upload it? Yours, Paul On 2023/4/2 04:04, Paul Gevers wrote: Source: libntru Version: 0.5-2 Severity: serious Control: tags -1 bookworm-ignore

Processed: found

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 1032975 0.11-3 Bug #1032975 [igdiscover] igdiscover -- Broken, unusable package due to incomplete code in the binary package Marked as found in versions igdiscover/0.11-3. > stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assi

Processed: Re: Bug#1033833: unknown-horizons: Fails to start Couldn't open content/fonts/Unifont.ttf

Processing control commands: > reassign -1 src:unifont Bug #1033833 [unknown-horizons] unknown-horizons: Fails to start Couldn't open content/fonts/Unifont.ttf Bug reassigned from package 'unknown-horizons' to 'src:unifont'. No longer marked as found in versions unknown-horizons/2019.1-5. Ignorin

Bug#1033833: unknown-horizons: Fails to start Couldn't open content/fonts/Unifont.ttf

Control: reassign -1 src:unifont Control: retitle -1 src:unifont: Dropping of unifont.ttf breaks unknown-horizons Control: found -1 1:15.0.01-1 Control: affects -1 unknown-horizons Hi Hans Joachim, thanks for the report! it seems so that the fonts package unifont dropped unifont.ttf in 1:15.0.01

Bug#1033732: [PATCH v2] x86/acpi/boot: Do not register processors that cannot be onlined for x2apic

On Sun, Apr 02, 2023 at 03:13:05PM +0200, Guy Durrieu wrote: > Yes it does. Thanks for testing. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette

Bug#1033832: marked as pending in php-db

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1033832 in php-db reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/php-team/pear/php-db/-/commit/914a40f85eb535342c3dcd4a193a

Processed: Bug#1033832 marked as pending in php-db

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1033832 [src:php-db] php-db: autopkgtest regression: FAIL DB::DB_Error[DB-1.11.0/tests/db_error.phpt] Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1033832 to the same tags previously set -- 1033832: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 1033832 https://github.com/pear/DB/pull/12 Bug #1033832 [src:php-db] php-db: autopkgtest regression: FAIL DB::DB_Error[DB-1.11.0/tests/db_error.phpt] Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://github.com/pear/DB/pull/12'. > forwarded 1033

Bug#1033827: Fix DEP8 test failures

The following salsa MP should fix the issue: https://salsa.debian.org/php-team/pear/php-dapphp-radius/-/merge_requests/4 -- Athos Ribeiro

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forcemerge 1030415 1033834 Bug #1030415 [src:php-log] php-log: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:11: override_dh_auto_test] Error 1 Bug #1030415 [src:php-log] php-log: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:11: override_dh_auto_test] Error 1 Added ta

Bug#1033732: [PATCH v2] x86/acpi/boot: Do not register processors that cannot be onlined for x2apic

Hi Guy, On Sun, Apr 02, 2023 at 03:13:05PM +0200, Guy Durrieu wrote: > Le 02/04/2023 à 12:57, Borislav Petkov a écrit : > > > On April 2, 2023 12:41:46 PM GMT+02:00, Guy Durrieu > > wrote: > > > My system worked fine with kernel 6.1.15, but stopped booting after > > > upgrading to 6.1.20 and re

Processed (with 1 error): merge with 1030415

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 1033834 > https://salsa.debian.org/php-team/pear/php-log/-/commit/fb958bf2f197defd6abb780cccf10490938082e5 Bug #1033834 [src:php-log] php-log: autopkgtest regression: extract-zend2.2.phpt Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://salsa.

Bug#1033805: opendmarc: Segmentation fault with 3072-bit key signatures in ARC-Seal headers

I'm not running it myself. I thought people on postfix-users reported the problem with our package. If you're confident it's already addressed, please close the bug and sorry for the noise. Scott K On April 2, 2023 7:43:15 AM UTC, "David Bürgin" wrote: >Also note that we have been shipping t

Processed: bug 1033732 is forwarded to https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/c02a2a2f-2b40-e13e-ac40-e5d19a66b...@cegetel.net/ ...

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 1033732 > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/c02a2a2f-2b40-e13e-ac40-e5d19a66b...@cegetel.net/ Bug #1033732 [src:linux] linux-image-6.1.0-7-amd64: The Linux 6.1.0-7-amd64 kernel launching crashes with a panic message Set Bug forwarded-to-add

Processed: Re: src:python-libzim: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS

Processing control commands: > severity -1 important Bug #1032568 {Done: Paul Gevers } [src:python-libzim] src:python-libzim: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' -- 1032568: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1032568 Debian B

Bug#1032568: src:python-libzim: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS

Control: severity -1 important I am lowering the severity to prevent the auto-removal which would happen before zimlib v8.1.1-0.2 migrates. That version is compatible with python-libzim 2.1.0.

Processed: Re: pytest-salt-factories: autopkgtest failure with python3.10

Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #1009804 [src:pytest-salt-factories] pytest-salt-factories: autopkgtest failure with python3.10 Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' > tags -1 bookworm-ignore Bug #1009804 [src:pytest-salt-factories] pytest-salt-factories: autopkgtest fai

Bug#1033836: postgresql-mysql-fdw: autopkgtest regression: expected output changed

Source: postgresql-mysql-fdw Version: 2.8.0-3 Severity: serious Control: tags -1 bookworm-ignore User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: regression Dear maintainer(s), Your package has an autopkgtest, great. However, it fails since December 2022. Can you please investigate the situation and

Processed: polyml: autopkgtest regression: output on stderr

Processing control commands: > found -1 5.7.1-4 Bug #1033835 [src:polyml] polyml: autopkgtest regression: output on stderr Marked as found in versions polyml/5.7.1-4. > tags -1 bookworm-ignore Bug #1033835 [src:polyml] polyml: autopkgtest regression: output on stderr Added tag(s) bookworm-ignore.

Processed: postgresql-mysql-fdw: autopkgtest regression: expected output changed

Processing control commands: > tags -1 bookworm-ignore Bug #1033836 [src:postgresql-mysql-fdw] postgresql-mysql-fdw: autopkgtest regression: expected output changed Added tag(s) bookworm-ignore. -- 1033836: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1033836 Debian Bug Tracking System Con

Bug#1033835: polyml: autopkgtest regression: output on stderr

Source: polyml Version: 5.7.1-5 Control: found -1 5.7.1-4 Severity: serious Control: tags -1 bookworm-ignore User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: regression Dear maintainer(s), Your package has an autopkgtest, great. However, it fails since July 2020. Can you please investigate the situat

Bug#1033834: php-log: autopkgtest regression: extract-zend2.2.phpt

Source: php-log Version: 1.13.2-1 Severity: serious Control: tags -1 bookworm-ignore User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: regression Dear maintainer(s), Your package has an autopkgtest, great. However, it fails since February 2023. Can you please investigate the situation and fix it? I co

Bug#1033833: unknown-horizons: Fails to start Couldn't open content/fonts/Unifont.ttf

Package: unknown-horizons Version: 2019.1-5 Severity: grave Dear Maintainer, When attempting to run uknown-horizons it fails with the following error message: $ unknown-horizons Discovered old settings file, auto-upgrading: 1 -> 38 Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/games/unknown-

Processed: php-log: autopkgtest regression: extract-zend2.2.phpt

Processing control commands: > tags -1 bookworm-ignore Bug #1033834 [src:php-log] php-log: autopkgtest regression: extract-zend2.2.phpt Added tag(s) bookworm-ignore. -- 1033834: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1033834 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org wit

Bug#1033732: [PATCH v2] x86/acpi/boot: Do not register processors that cannot be onlined for x2apic

Le 02/04/2023 à 12:57, Borislav Petkov a écrit : On April 2, 2023 12:41:46 PM GMT+02:00, Guy Durrieu wrote: My system worked fine with kernel 6.1.15, but stopped booting after upgrading to 6.1.20 and resulted in a kernel panic: Does this fix it: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/g

Bug#1033832: php-db: autopkgtest regression: FAIL DB::DB_Error[DB-1.11.0/tests/db_error.phpt]

Source: php-db Version: 1.11.0-0.2 Severity: serious Control: tags -1 bookworm-ignore User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: regression Dear maintainer(s), Your package has an autopkgtest, great. However, it fails since January 2022. Can you please investigate the situation and fix it? I co

Processed: php-db: autopkgtest regression: FAIL DB::DB_Error[DB-1.11.0/tests/db_error.phpt]

Processing control commands: > tags -1 bookworm-ignore Bug #1033832 [src:php-db] php-db: autopkgtest regression: FAIL DB::DB_Error[DB-1.11.0/tests/db_error.phpt] Added tag(s) bookworm-ignore. -- 1033832: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1033832 Debian Bug Tracking System Contac

Bug#1033732: linux-image-6.1.0-7-amd64: The Linux 6.1.0-7-amd64 kernel launching crashes with a panic message

I sent the requested report. And indeed received a new patch to be tested.  In progress... Le 02/04/2023 à 10:30, Diederik de Haas a écrit : On Sunday, 2 April 2023 00:24:26 CEST Diederik de Haas wrote: 2) The commit that Bjørn identified also contained a "Link:" tag: https://lore.kernel.org/r

Bug#1033732: [PATCH v2] x86/acpi/boot: Do not register processors that cannot be onlined for x2apic

On April 2, 2023 12:41:46 PM GMT+02:00, Guy Durrieu wrote: >My system worked fine with kernel 6.1.15, but stopped booting after >upgrading to 6.1.20 and resulted in a kernel panic: Does this fix it: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git/log/?h=x86/urgent Thx. -- Sent fr

Processed: php-dapphp-radius: autopkgtest regression: Class "Dapphp\Radius\Radius" not found

Processing control commands: > found -1 2.5.8-1 Bug #1033827 [src:php-dapphp-radius] php-dapphp-radius: autopkgtest regression: Class "Dapphp\Radius\Radius" not found Marked as found in versions php-dapphp-radius/2.5.8-1. > tags -1 bookworm-ignore Bug #1033827 [src:php-dapphp-radius] php-dapphp-r

Bug#1033827: php-dapphp-radius: autopkgtest regression: Class "Dapphp\Radius\Radius" not found

Source: php-dapphp-radius Version: 2.5.8-2 Control: found -1 2.5.8-1 Severity: serious Control: tags -1 bookworm-ignore User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: regression Dear maintainer(s), Your package has an autopkgtest, great. However, it started to fail around May/June 2022. Can you ple

Bug#1033732: [PATCH v2] x86/acpi/boot: Do not register processors that cannot be onlined for x2apic

Le 05/01/2023 à 05:10, Kishon Vijay Abraham I a écrit : Section 5.2.12.12 Processor Local x2APIC Structure in the ACPI v6.5 spec mandates that both "enabled" and "online capable" Local APIC Flags should be used to determine if the processor is usable or not. However, Linux doesn't use the "onli

Processed: tagging 1030905

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1030905 + pending Bug #1030905 [src:sardana] sardana: FTBFS (cannot import name 'getargspec' from 'sphinx.util.inspect') Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1030905: https:/

Processed: tagging 1031479

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1031479 - bookworm Bug #1031479 [src:ruby-eye] ruby-eye: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby3.1" failed: /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/rubygems/specification.rb:1413:in `rescue in block in activate_dependencies': Could not find 'celluloid' (~> 0.16.0) amo

Processed: tagging 1031468

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1031468 - bookworm Bug #1031468 [src:ruby-rubydns] ruby-rubydns: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby3.1" failed: /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/rubygems/specification.rb:1413:in `rescue in block in activate_dependencies': Could not find 'celluloid' (= 0.16

Processed: tagging 1001144

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1001144 - pending Bug #1001144 [odbc-mdbtools] odbc-mdbtools: Missing dependency on odbcinst Removed tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1001144: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bu

Processed: fixed 1031439 in 5

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > fixed 1031439 5 Bug #1031439 [src:gcc-sh-elf] gcc-sh-elf: FTBFS: make[6]: *** No rule to make target '../libsframe/libsframe.la', needed by 'libbfd.la'. Stop. Marked as fixed in versions gcc-sh-elf/5. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please c

Bug#1033433: marked as done (cfgrib: FTBFS in testing: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:21: override_dh_auto_test] Error 13)

Your message dated Sun, 02 Apr 2023 09:04:02 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1033433: fixed in cfgrib 0.9.10.3-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1033433, regarding cfgrib: FTBFS in testing: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:21: override_dh_auto_test] Error 13 to be marked as done. This mea

Bug#1033824: passwordsafe: autopkgtest regression: test dependencies transitioned

Source: passwordsafe Version: 1.16.0+dfsg-1 Severity: serious Control: tags -1 bookworm-ignore User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: regression Dear maintainer(s), Your package has an autopkgtest, great. However, it started to fail when we finished the wcwidgets3.0 -> wxwidgets3.2 transiti

Processed: passwordsafe: autopkgtest regression: test dependencies transitioned

Processing control commands: > tags -1 bookworm-ignore Bug #1033824 [src:passwordsafe] passwordsafe: autopkgtest regression: test dependencies transitioned Added tag(s) bookworm-ignore. -- 1033824: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1033824 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow..

Bug#1033732: linux-image-6.1.0-7-amd64: The Linux 6.1.0-7-amd64 kernel launching crashes with a panic message

On Sunday, 2 April 2023 00:24:26 CEST Diederik de Haas wrote: > 2) The commit that Bjørn identified also contained a "Link:" tag: > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230105041059.39366-1-kvija...@amd.com > > The best thing to do is to respond to that thread and explain the issue you > ran into. If you

Processed: osmo-iuh: autopkgtest regression: test dependency no longer in unstable/testing

Processing control commands: > tags -1 bookworm-ignore Bug #1033823 [src:osmo-iuh] osmo-iuh: autopkgtest regression: test dependency no longer in unstable/testing Added tag(s) bookworm-ignore. -- 1033823: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1033823 Debian Bug Tracking System Conta

Bug#1033823: osmo-iuh: autopkgtest regression: test dependency no longer in unstable/testing

Source: osmo-iuh Version: 1.3.0+dfsg1-3 Severity: serious Control: tags -1 bookworm-ignore User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: regression Dear maintainer(s), Your package has an autopkgtest, great. However, it started failing in March 2022. Can you please investigate the situation and fi

Processed: oscrypto: autopkgtest regression: certificate expired 2023-01-01 00:00:00Z

Processing control commands: > tags -1 bookworm-ignore Bug #1033822 [src:oscrypto] oscrypto: autopkgtest regression: certificate expired 2023-01-01 00:00:00Z Added tag(s) bookworm-ignore. -- 1033822: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1033822 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow

Bug#1033822: oscrypto: autopkgtest regression: certificate expired 2023-01-01 00:00:00Z

Source: oscrypto Version: 1.3.0-1 Severity: serious Control: tags -1 bookworm-ignore User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: regression Dear maintainer(s), Your package has an autopkgtest, great. However, it started to fail on 2023-01-01. Can you please investigate the situation and fix it?

Bug#1033821: node-sockjs-client: autopkgtest regression: expected 1006 to equal 1000

Source: node-sockjs-client Version: 1.6.1+dfsg1-1 Severity: serious Control: tags -1 bookworm-ignore User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: regression Dear maintainer(s), Your package has an autopkgtest, great. However, it started to fail around October 2022. Can you please investigate the

Processed: node-sockjs-client: autopkgtest regression: expected 1006 to equal 1000

Processing control commands: > tags -1 bookworm-ignore Bug #1033821 [src:node-sockjs-client] node-sockjs-client: autopkgtest regression: expected 1006 to equal 1000 Added tag(s) bookworm-ignore. -- 1033821: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1033821 Debian Bug Tracking System Con

Processed: node-snapdragon: autopkgtest regression: Cannot find module 'snapdragon-node'

Processing control commands: > found -1 0.12.1+~cs1.2.1-1 Bug #1033820 [src:node-snapdragon] node-snapdragon: autopkgtest regression: Cannot find module 'snapdragon-node' Marked as found in versions node-snapdragon/0.12.1+~cs1.2.1-1. > tags -1 bookworm-ignore Bug #1033820 [src:node-snapdragon] no

Bug#1033820: node-snapdragon: autopkgtest regression: Cannot find module 'snapdragon-node'

Source: node-snapdragon Version: 0.12.1+~cs1.2.1-2 Control: found -1 0.12.1+~cs1.2.1-1 Severity: serious Control: tags -1 bookworm-ignore User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: regression Dear maintainer(s), Your package has an autopkgtest, great. However, it started to fail at the beginnin

Bug#1033819: node-prosemirror-schema-list: autopkgtest regression: Accessing Object.prototype.__proto__ has been disallowed with --disable-proto=throw

Source: node-prosemirror-schema-list Version: 1.1.6+~1.0.3-1 Severity: serious Control: tags -1 bookworm-ignore User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: regression Dear maintainer(s), Your package has an autopkgtest, great. However, it started to fail recently (October 2022). Can you please i

  1   2   >