Hello, py7zr maintainer.
I was pushed some commits for Debain salsa repository to fix CVE-2022-44900 .
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/py7zr/-/merge_requests/2
--
YOKOTA
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 1030415
> https://salsa.debian.org/php-team/pear/php-log/-/commit/fb958bf2f197defd6abb780cccf10490938082e5
Bug #1030415 [src:php-log] php-log: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:11:
override_dh_auto_test] Error 1
Set Bug forwarded-to-ad
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 normal
Bug #1033422 [base-passwd] base-passwd: missing Build-Depends docbook
Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious'
--
1033422: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1033422
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with prob
Control: severity -1 normal
On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 07:30:26PM +, henrynmail-deb...@yahoo.com wrote:
> Package: base-passwd
> Version: 3.6.1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: ftbfs
> Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
> Usertags: rebootstrap
>
> Dear Main
Your message dated Fri, 24 Mar 2023 21:05:48 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#101: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #999726,
regarding ruby-omniauth-shibboleth: FTBFS with ruby-omniauth 2.0.x: ERROR: Test
"ruby2.7" failed: Failure/Error: expect(
Your message dated Fri, 24 Mar 2023 21:07:01 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#102: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #965500,
regarding drbdlinks: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Fri, 24 Mar 2023 21:07:01 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#102: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #945663,
regarding drbdlinks: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the prob
Your message dated Fri, 24 Mar 2023 21:07:01 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#102: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #945663,
regarding drbdlinks: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has bee
Your message dated Fri, 24 Mar 2023 20:49:16 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1033295: fixed in cairosvg 2.5.2-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1033295,
regarding cairosvg: CVE-2023-27586: SSRF & DOS vulnerability
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 1031432 1.7.14-1
Bug #1031432 {Done: Markus Koschany } [rhino] mediaelement:
FTBFS: FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory:
'../build/mediaelement.min.js'
Bug #1031452 {Done: Markus Koschany } [rhino] prettify.js:
FTBFS: j
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 999526 python3-mdp 3.6-1.1
Bug #999526 [src:mdp] mdp: FTBFS with numpy 1.21 (in experimental):
dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p 3.9
returned exit code 13
Bug reassigned from package 'src:mdp' to 'p
Source: pyramid-jinja2
Version: 2.7+dfsg-1.2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230323 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (bookworm), your package failed
to build on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: cloud-sptheme
Version: 1.10.1.post20200504175005-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230323 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (bookworm), your package failed
to build on amd64.
Relevant p
Source: devscripts
Version: 2.23.2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230323 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (bookworm), your package failed
to build on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[
Source: cfgrib
Version: 0.9.10.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230323 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (bookworm), your package failed
to build on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[
Source: cookiecutter
Version: 1.7.3-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230323 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (bookworm), your package failed
to build on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> d
Source: simutrans-pak128.britain
Version: 1.18-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230323 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (bookworm), your package failed
to build on amd64.
Relevant part (hopef
Source: tycho
Version: 1.6.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230323 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (bookworm), your package failed
to build on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: python-uhashring
Version: 2.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230323 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (bookworm), your package failed
to build on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: emoslib
Version: 2:4.5.9-7
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230323 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (bookworm), your package failed
to build on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cd /<
Source: python-scrapy
Version: 2.8.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230323 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (bookworm), your package failed
to build on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> t
Source: image-factory
Version: 1.0.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230323 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (bookworm), your package failed
to build on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> m
Package: base-passwd
Version: 3.6.1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Usertags: rebootstrap
Dear Maintainer,
build in a minimal build environmet fails for docbook2html.
# apt remove docbook && apt autoremove
# apt build-d
Package: newt
Version: 0.52.23-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Tags: ftbfs patch
Usertags: rebootstrap
Dear Maintainer,
the build option "nopython" was not respected in all cases.
In rules exist a check for nopython in DEB_BUILD_P
Package: newt
Version: 0.52.23-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Usertags: rebootstrap
Dear Maintainer,
build in a minimal build environmet fails for docbook2html.
# apt source newt
# cd newt-0.52.23
# apt build-dep new
Your message dated Fri, 24 Mar 2023 15:56:52 +0100
with message-id <8336f60d-9800-0b2e-d076-fea84aaa7...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#1024261: debhelper: dbgsym packages contain directoryr
writable by build user
has caused the Debian Bug report #1024261,
regarding debhelper: dbgsym packag
Package: liferea
Version: 1.14.1-1
Severity: grave
X-Debbugs-Cc: none, H.-Dirk Schmitt
Before bookworm upgrade liferea was working o.k.
Now – on bookworm – the startup fails with „Segmentation fault“.
The problem occured also on 2nd hardware with different user.
The problem is also occuring af
Prepared the patch to be included in order to fix this [1] and built
patched kwin myself to confirm this solves the issue.
Marco
[1] https://salsa.debian.org/qt-kde-team/kde/kwin/-/merge_requests/6
Your message dated Fri, 24 Mar 2023 14:49:41 +0100
with message-id <20230324134941.ga3826...@subdivi.de>
and subject line Re: Bug#1033403: mpdecimal: Packet missing in bookworm
has caused the Debian Bug report #1033403,
regarding mpdecimal: Packet missing in bookworm
to be marked as done.
This mea
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # "Package is not in testing" is not a release-critical bug; the actual bug
> is #1013395, which is already the right severity
> severity 1033402 normal
Bug #1033402 [mpdecimal] mpdecimal: Packet mpdecimal missing in bookworm
Severity set to 'nor
Package: mpdecimal
Version: 2.4.2
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Tags: ftbfs
Usertags: rebootstrap
Dear Maintainer,
Source information for mpdecimal are missing for Debian bookworm.
No Source package available. Detected by rebootst
Package: mpdecimal
Version: 2.4.2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Usertags: rebootstrap
Dear Maintainer,
Source information for mpdecimal are missing for Debian bookworm.
No Source package available. Detected by rebootst
Am Freitag, dem 24.03.2023 um 09:21 +0200 schrieb Timo Aaltonen:
> Markus Koschany kirjoitti 23.3.2023 klo 19.00:
> > Control: severity -1 serious
> >
> > On Fri, 24 Feb 2023 11:48:36 +0200 Timo Aaltonen
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Upstream doesn't support tomcat10 yet, and tomcatjss fails to build w
Hi!
With no response to the RC bug in 7 days, I've just uploaded an NMU to
DELAYED/7-days.
I have also fixed #1006942 at the same time by upgrading to version
2.1.5 and updating the Depends field; the differences between 2.1.3
and 2.1.5 are only minor. (The diff-file attached is large primarily
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1032380 patch
Bug #1032380 [arriero] arriero: AttributeError: module 'collections' has no
attribute 'MutableSet'
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1032380: https://bugs.debi
Hello,
I have attached a debdiff where I import the collections.abc package
which has the MutableSet attribute. With this fix, the package builds
and `arriero --help` outputs the expected help menu. I can upload this
RC bug fix as a NMU if you want. Thanks!
--
Josef Schneider
GPG Fingerprin
Your message dated Fri, 24 Mar 2023 11:24:56 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: opentk: Please disable OpenGL ES 1 support
has caused the Debian Bug report #855120,
regarding opentk: Please disable OpenGL ES 1 support
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has be
Package: dkms
Version: 3.0.10-7
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-Cc: Dimitri John Ledkov
Hi,
the fix-builtin-archive-dkms-coinstallation.patch makes the testsuite
(and therefore the autopkgtest) fail:
...
Adding the multiver test modules by directory
Building the multiver test modules
Installing the
Hi,
Le 22/03/2023 à 17:58, Marc Dequènes (duck) a écrit :
Quack,
Honestly when I read the title I really wondered how phog could have
ended-up shipping this file. I forgot it initially, was asked about it
and added it quickly, so it's not like I would have rejected the idea.
Well yes, it wa
Processing control commands:
> fixed -1 5.6.2+dfsg-3
Bug #1019769 [src:opencpn] opencpn: Please transition to wxwidgets3.2
Marked as fixed in versions opencpn/5.6.2+dfsg-3.
> close -1
Bug #1019769 [src:opencpn] opencpn: Please transition to wxwidgets3.2
Marked Bug as done
--
1019769: https://bug
control: fixed -1 5.6.2+dfsg-3
control: close -1
thanks
On Thu, 5 Jan 2023 10:28:28 +1300 Olly Betts wrote:
Just a friendly note to highlight that opencpn needs to re-enter testing
to make it into bookworm, and that the release freeze cut-off for
re-entering testing is 2023-02-12:
https://rel
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> unarchive 855120
Bug #855120 {Done: Andreas Beckmann } [src:opentk] opentk:
Please disable OpenGL ES 1 support
Unarchived Bug 855120
> reopen 855120
Bug #855120 {Done: Andreas Beckmann } [src:opentk] opentk:
Please disable OpenGL ES 1 support
'r
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1008320 + patch
Bug #1008320 [src:ocrfeeder] ocrfeeder: CVE-2022-27811
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1008320: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1008320
De
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 1030440 https://nuitka.net/posts/python311-experimental-support.html
Bug #1030440 [src:nuitka] nuitka: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:47:
override_dh_auto_test] Error 1
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://nuitka.net/posts/pytho
Markus Koschany kirjoitti 23.3.2023 klo 19.00:
Control: severity -1 serious
On Fri, 24 Feb 2023 11:48:36 +0200 Timo Aaltonen wrote:
Upstream doesn't support tomcat10 yet, and tomcatjss fails to build with it.
Unfortunately we can only support one Tomcat version per release. We should
eith
45 matches
Mail list logo
