Your message dated Fri, 24 Mar 2023 00:04:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1032889: fixed in itinerary 22.12.3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1032889,
regarding itinerary doesn't start at all
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
I
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 103 normal
Bug #103 [src:rust-encoding] Don't include in Bookworm
Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious'
> retitle 103 rust-encoding is unmaintained upstream
Bug #103 [src:rust-encoding] Don't include in Bookworm
Changed
severity 103 normal
retitle 103 rust-encoding is unmaintained upstream
severity 104 normal
retitle 104 rust-boxfnonce is unmaintained upstream
severity 105 normal
retitle 105 rust-const-cstr is unmaintained upstream
(summarising several bugs)
there is https://rustsec.org/
Source: ruby-riddle
Version: 2.4.2-3
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: timeout
Dear maintainer(s),
Your package has an autopkgtest, great. However, it fails on 32 bit
architectures. What's worse, it fails because it seems to hang and
eventually times out due to autop
On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 07:34:49PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 23-03-2023 18:28, Grzegorz Szymaszek wrote:
> > Would it be possible for you to run another build?
> http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#testing/liferea/1.14.1-2/buildlog
Thanks! Well, this one does not crash.
signature
Hi
On 23-03-2023 18:28, Grzegorz Szymaszek wrote:
Would it be possible for you to run another build?
http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#testing/liferea/1.14.1-2/buildlog
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 serious
Bug #1033155 [src:gnupg2] migration test fails when EC key present in test
keyrings
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
--
1033155: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1033155
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.d
Hi again,
This d/patches file was there until openjdk-16 but it's not there anymore in
openjdk-17:
https://salsa.debian.org/openjdk-team/openjdk/-/blob/openjdk-16/debian/patches/jexec.diff
Could this be the reason for this problem? What is its intentional abandonment?
Sorry for the noise otherwis
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 12:41:52PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> I've went ahead and the build is running now here:
> http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/liferea/1.14.1-2/buildlog
>
> Once done, you can pull the liferea-data and liferea deb's from that page
> and install th
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 serious
Bug #1031816 [src:tomcatjss] tomcatjss: Migrate to Tomcat 10
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
--
1031816: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1031816
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Source: resteasy3.0
Version: 3.0.26-5
Severity: serious
Tags: help
X-Debbugs-Cc: a...@debian.org
Hello,
currently resteasy3.0 depends on libtomcat9-java but should rather
depend on libtomcat10-java. The reasoning for this is the fact that we
can only support one tomcat package per release for sec
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 serious
Bug #1031817 [src:i2p] i2p: Migrate to Tomcat 10
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
--
1031817: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1031817
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Your message dated Thu, 23 Mar 2023 16:02:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1032476: fixed in apache2 2.4.56-1~deb11u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1032476,
regarding apache2: CVE-2023-25690 CVE-2023-27522
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 important
Bug #1031943 [ebtables] ebtables: symlink removal removal code in the postinst
does not seem to be working
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
--
1031943: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1031943
Debian Bug Tracking Sy
control: severity -1 important
On 3/23/23 16:18, Jeremy Sowden wrote:
On 2023-03-23, at 15:58:45 +0100, Alberto Molina Coballes wrote:
I agree with Arturo, the proposed change should be harmless, but we
were not able to reproduce the issue in any of the test performed so I
was thinking to lower
On 2023-03-23, at 15:58:45 +0100, Alberto Molina Coballes wrote:
> I agree with Arturo, the proposed change should be harmless, but we
> were not able to reproduce the issue in any of the test performed so I
> was thinking to lower the severity and apply the patch but don't ask
> to be included in
I agree with Arturo, the proposed change should be harmless, but we
were not able to reproduce the issue in any of the test performed so I
was thinking to lower the severity and apply the patch but don't ask
to be included in bookworm.
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, dem 23.03.2023 um 15:08 +0100 schrieb Paul Gevers:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 13 Feb 2023 14:42:17 + Debian FTP Masters
> wrote:
> > * New upstream version 1.7.14.
> > - Fix FTBFS with OpenJDK 17. (Closes: #1026639)
>
> Is it possible to get a targeted fix? This new upstr
Hi,
On Mon, 13 Feb 2023 14:42:17 + Debian FTP Masters
wrote:
* New upstream version 1.7.14.
- Fix FTBFS with OpenJDK 17. (Closes: #1026639)
Is it possible to get a targeted fix? This new upstream is not
reviewable and I seriously doubt it meets the freeze policy [1]
1325 files
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 1031960 1.03-5~exp
Bug #1031960 {Done: Adrian Bunk } [src:cpufetch] cpufetch
FTBFS on ppc64/ppc64el
Marked as fixed in versions cpufetch/1.03-5~exp.
Bug #1031960 {Done: Adrian Bunk } [src:cpufetch] cpufetch
FTBFS on ppc64/ppc64el
Bug 10319
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 1031960 1.03-4
Bug #1031960 [src:cpufetch] cpufetch FTBFS on ppc64/ppc64el
Marked as fixed in versions cpufetch/1.03-4.
Bug #1031960 [src:cpufetch] cpufetch FTBFS on ppc64/ppc64el
Marked Bug as done
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please
Hi
The list-rdeps.sh script in
https://salsa.debian.org/rust-team/debcargo-conf/ shows that it's in
use:
$ ./dev/list-rdeps.sh const-cstr
Versions of rust-const-cstr in unstable:
librust-const-cstr-dev 0.3.0-1+b1
Versions of rdeps of rust-const-cstr in unstable, that
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 980316 bookworm-ignore
Bug #980316 [yarnpkg] Update yarnpkg to 2.x versions using corepack repo
Added tag(s) bookworm-ignore.
> tags 958686 bookworm-ignore
Bug #958686 [node-yarnpkg] node-yarnpkg: Remove dependency to node-request
Added tag(s
Processing control commands:
> reopen -1
Bug #1022760 {Done: Markus Koschany } [openrefine] openrefine:
localhost: returns HTTP ERROR 404 Not Found
Bug reopened
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1022760 to the same values
previously set
> severity -1 serious
Bug #1022760 [open
Hi,
On 23-03-2023 12:21, Paul Gevers wrote:
Hi Grzegorz,
On 21-03-2023 17:48, Grzegorz Szymaszek wrote:
[3]: https://github.com/lwindolf/liferea/issues/1214
This issue identified the broken commit and it was confirmed that
revering the commit unbroke liferea for the bug submitter. Are you i
Hi Grzegorz,
On 21-03-2023 17:48, Grzegorz Szymaszek wrote:
[3]: https://github.com/lwindolf/liferea/issues/1214
This issue identified the broken commit and it was confirmed that
revering the commit unbroke liferea for the bug submitter. Are you in
the position to build and test with that co
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1010347 + pending
Bug #1010347 [src:cloudcompare] cloudcompare: CVE-2021-21897 - heap-based
buffer overflow loading a DXF file via embedded dxflib
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assist
On Wed, 08 Mar 2023 10:47:25 +0100 Laurent Bigonville wrote:
$ pkcon what-provides application/x-keepass2
Getting provides[=]
Loading cache [=]
Querying[=
On Thu, 23 Mar 2023 09:46:05 +0100 Thomas Goirand wrote:
Hi,
It's been a month since the last entry in this bug, with nobody able to
reproduce the bug, and no answer from original submitter. Shall we:
- close the bug?
- lower severity?
- apply the patch?
Introducing the proposed change sho
Your message dated Thu, 23 Mar 2023 08:55:25 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#985377: fixed in gitlab-ci-multi-runner 14.10.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #985377,
regarding CVE-2020-13327
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If thi
Your message dated Thu, 23 Mar 2023 08:55:25 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1023116: fixed in gitlab-ci-multi-runner 14.10.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1023116,
regarding gitlab-ci-multi-runner build-depends on non-existing
golang-github-gorilla-context-dev
to be marked as do
Your message dated Thu, 23 Mar 2023 08:55:25 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1010452: fixed in gitlab-ci-multi-runner 14.10.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1010452,
regarding gitlab-ci-multi-runner: FTBFS: test failure
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the prob
Hi,
It's been a month since the last entry in this bug, with nobody able to
reproduce the bug, and no answer from original submitter. Shall we:
- close the bug?
- lower severity?
- apply the patch?
Cheers,
Thomas Goirand (zigo)
33 matches
Mail list logo
