Bug#1026491: marked as done (puppet-beaker: FTBFS: Failure/Error: hosts_yaml = YAML.load_file(preserved_file))

2023-03-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 16 Mar 2023 05:56:29 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1032693: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1026491, regarding puppet-beaker: FTBFS: Failure/Error: hosts_yaml = YAML.load_file(preserved_file) to

Bug#1025979: marked as done (puppet-beaker: autopkgtest needs update for new version of ruby-net-scp: Could not find 'net-scp' (~> 3.0))

2023-03-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 16 Mar 2023 05:56:29 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1032693: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1025979, regarding puppet-beaker: autopkgtest needs update for new version of ruby-net-scp: Could not find 'net-scp' (~> 3.0) to be m

Bug#1032884: Acknowledgement (amanda-client: Amanda is unusable)

2023-03-15 Thread Hideki Yamane
control: tags -1 +pending On Wed, 15 Mar 2023 18:39:47 + Jose M Calhariz wrote: > Thank you, your problem is known and will be fixed on the next upload. -- Hideki Yamane

Processed: Re: Bug#1032884: Acknowledgement (amanda-client: Amanda is unusable)

2023-03-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 +pending Bug #1032884 [amanda-client] amanda-client: Amanda is unusable Added tag(s) pending. -- 1032884: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1032884 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Re: Bug#987008: grub2: diff for NMU version 2.06-8.1

2023-03-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 +pending Bug #987008 [grub2] Grub fails to find LVM volume after previous LV rename Added tag(s) pending. -- 987008: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=987008 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#987008: grub2: diff for NMU version 2.06-8.1

2023-03-15 Thread Hideki Yamane
Control: tags -1 +pending Hi from RC bugs digger, It's better to show this issue is going to be solved, add "pending" is good to avoid duplicate efforts :) -- Hideki Yamane

Bug#1031441: Potential RM candidate ?

2023-03-15 Thread Daniel Leidert
Am Mittwoch, dem 15.03.2023 um 21:19 +0530 schrieb Pirate Praveen: > On Mon, 13 Mar 2023 23:17:02 +0530 Mohd Bilal > wrote: >  > Hello, >  > >  > The upstream[1] for ruby-github-api has been inactive for over 2 years >  > now and this is affecting other packages like ruby-oauth2[2] and >  > ruby-

Processed: forcibly merging 1032983 1033022

2023-03-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forcemerge 1032983 1033022 Bug #1032983 [firefox-esr] firefox-esr: TLS websites broken with libnss3 2:3.87.1-1 from Debian testing/bookworm Bug #1033022 [firefox-esr] firefox-esr: does not display web pages Severity set to 'important' from 'grave

Bug#1032959: marked as done (gobject-introspection: 1.76 fails to build on several architectures)

2023-03-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 15 Mar 2023 20:40:13 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1032959: fixed in gobject-introspection 1.76.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1032959, regarding gobject-introspection: 1.76 fails to build on several architectures to be marked as done. This means that y

Bug#1033022: firefox-esr: does not display web pages

2023-03-15 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
On 2023-03-15, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > After upgrading to the latest firefox-esr, all web pages fail to display > anything... ... > Are there any unversioned or missing dependencies on something that > should also come from sid? Apparently, it needs libnss3 2:3.89-1 from sid to work properly...

Bug#1033022: firefox-esr: does not display web pages

2023-03-15 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
Package: firefox-esr Version: 102.9.0esr-1 Severity: grave X-Debbugs-Cc: vagr...@debian.org After upgrading to the latest firefox-esr, all web pages fail to display anything... except those in my pinned tabs, although those also fail to do anything other than display presumably cached content? Clo

Bug#1032884: Acknowledgement (amanda-client: Amanda is unusable)

2023-03-15 Thread Jose M Calhariz
On 3/13/23 13:16, Kamil Jońca wrote: "Debian Bug Tracking System" writes: Thank you for filing a new Bug report with Debian. You can follow progress on this Bug here: 1032884: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1032884. dpkg -l "amanda*" Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/

Bug#1033011: marked as done (octave-dev: missing Breaks+Replaces against older liboctave-dev)

2023-03-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 15 Mar 2023 18:21:47 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1033011: fixed in octave 7.3.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1033011, regarding octave-dev: missing Breaks+Replaces against older liboctave-dev to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pr

Bug#1032884: Acknowledgement (amanda-client: Amanda is unusable)

2023-03-15 Thread Jose M Calhariz
On 3/15/23 18:29, Kamil Jońca wrote: Jose M Calhariz writes: On 3/13/23 13:16, Kamil Jońca wrote: "Debian Bug Tracking System" writes: Thank you for filing a new Bug report with Debian. You can follow progress on this Bug here: 1032884: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1

Bug#1032884: Acknowledgement (amanda-client: Amanda is unusable)

2023-03-15 Thread Kamil Jońca
Jose M Calhariz writes: > On 3/13/23 13:16, Kamil Jońca wrote: >> "Debian Bug Tracking System" writes: >> >>> Thank you for filing a new Bug report with Debian. >>> >>> You can follow progress on this Bug here: 1032884: >>> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1032884. >>> >> dpkg

Bug#1029167: marked as done (mozjs78: Fails to build on armhf and armel)

2023-03-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 15 Mar 2023 17:43:10 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1029167: fixed in mozjs78 78.15.0-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #1029167, regarding mozjs78: Fails to build on armhf and armel to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dea

Bug#1033011: marked as pending in octave

2023-03-15 Thread Sébastien Villemot
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1033011 in octave reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-octave-team/octave/-/commit/756d8bb0d94d16f4c95f0f4e41

Bug#1033011: marked as pending in octave

2023-03-15 Thread Sébastien Villemot
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1033011 in octave reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-octave-team/octave/-/commit/cdb6c2437fb69d0cf86246143c

Processed: Bug#1033011 marked as pending in octave

2023-03-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1033011 [octave-dev] octave-dev: missing Breaks+Replaces against older liboctave-dev Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1033011 to the same tags previously set -- 1033011: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1033011 Debian Bug

Processed: Bug#1033011 marked as pending in octave

2023-03-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1033011 [octave-dev] octave-dev: missing Breaks+Replaces against older liboctave-dev Added tag(s) pending. -- 1033011: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1033011 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with probl

Bug#1033011: octave-dev: missing Breaks+Replaces against older liboctave-dev

2023-03-15 Thread Sébastien Villemot
Le mercredi 15 mars 2023 à 17:51 +0100, Sébastien Villemot a écrit : > As a consequence, upgrades from Buster to Bookworm with liboctave-dev > installed can fail I meant from Bullseye to Bookworm. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀  Sébastien Villemot ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁  Debian Developer ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀  https://sebastien.villemot.name ⠈⠳

Bug#1033011: octave-dev: missing Breaks+Replaces against older liboctave-dev

2023-03-15 Thread Sébastien Villemot
Package: octave-dev Version: 6.3.0-1 Severity: serious liboctave-dev has been renamed octave-dev, but the latter misses a Breaks+Replaces against the former. As a consequence, upgrades from Buster to Bookworm with liboctave-dev installed can fail, because the new octave-dev wants to overwrite fil

Bug#1029167: mozjs78: Fails to build on armhf and armel

2023-03-15 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Hi Jeremy and Simon! On 2023-03-15 11:50, Emanuele Rocca wrote: > Motivated by this, I've tried to build mozjs78 with GCC 11 instead of > 12, and it *did* build successfully. My proposal is thus to build > mozjs78 with GCC 11 on armhf and armel, see attached patch. I've now discovered that this v

Bug#1031441: Potential RM candidate ?

2023-03-15 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Mon, 13 Mar 2023 23:17:02 +0530 Mohd Bilal wrote: > Hello, > > The upstream[1] for ruby-github-api has been inactive for over 2 years > now and this is affecting other packages like ruby-oauth2[2] and > ruby-faraday[3] from migrating. > > $ reverse-depends -b ruby-github-api > Reverse-Build

Bug#1033005: puppetdb: "fresh" installion results in "permission denied for table schema_migrations"

2023-03-15 Thread CSights
Package: puppetdb Version: 7.12.1-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Greetings, Setting up puppetdb with a empty database seems to not succeed. puppetdb fails to start and issues the message: "Execution error (PSQLException) at org.postgresql.core.v3.QueryExecutorImpl/

Bug#995156: easy-rsa: vars Autodetection

2023-03-15 Thread Dennis Camera
On Wed, 1 Mar 2023 19:05:13 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Has anyone discussed this with upstream? > > This seems to be an area with frequent changes upstream, adding a >patch > that is not a backport from upstream might be a bad idea. From what I can tell upstream has addressed this issue in rele

Processed: Re: python3-tk: bytecode not removed on upgrade

2023-03-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 patch Bug #1031909 [python3-tk] python3-tk: bytecode not removed on upgrade Added tag(s) patch. -- 1031909: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1031909 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1031909: python3-tk: bytecode not removed on upgrade

2023-03-15 Thread James Addison
Followup-For: Bug #1031909 Control: tags -1 patch

Bug#1031909: python3-tk: bytecode not removed on upgrade

2023-03-15 Thread James Addison
Package: python3-tk Followup-For: Bug #1031909 Dear Maintainer, Please find a merge request on Salsa to resolve this issue for future versions of python3-tk at https://salsa.debian.org/cpython-team/python3-stdlib/-/merge_requests/5 This has been tested by installing the previous version of the

Processed: Re: Bug#1029167: mozjs78: Fails to build on armhf and armel

2023-03-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + patch Bug #1029167 [src:mozjs78] mozjs78: Fails to build on armhf and armel Added tag(s) patch. -- 1029167: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1029167 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1029167: mozjs78: Fails to build on armhf and armel

2023-03-15 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Control: tags -1 + patch Hi Simon, On 2023-03-13 04:42, Simon McVittie wrote: > The other possible route for fixing mozjs78's build on armhf and armel > is to locate whatever fixes in ICU made it link successfully on armhf > and armel, and backport those to the version of ICU that is vendored by

Bug#1032120: Upload of new upstream version before fix has migrated to testing (Was: Re: Bug#1032120: tiledb: uses atomic operations, but is not linked to libatomic)

2023-03-15 Thread Andreas Tille
[Release team in CC] Am Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 08:45:21AM +0530 schrieb Nilesh Patra: > I am removing myself from the uploaders field/maintenance of tiledb-py. Feel > free to update it once tiledb is ready for migration. The repository > lives at python team namespace. I admit I'm strongly in favou

Bug#1032975: igdiscover -- Broken, unusable package due to incomplete code in the binary package

2023-03-15 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Nilesh, Am Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 07:45:52AM +0530 schrieb Nilesh Patra: > igdiscover vendors just a /usr/bin/igdiscover with is supposed to be > nothing more than just a wrapper. The actual code is missing from the > binary package (i.e. the python files) effectively making igdiscover > useless.