Forwarded: https://lists.launchpad.net/maria-discuss/msg06508.html
This is most likely a duplicate of
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1031863
Your message dated Tue, 07 Mar 2023 00:19:01 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1032448: fixed in gnome-initial-setup 43.2-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1032448,
regarding gnome-initial-setup: no longer starts
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #1032448 [src:gnome-initial-setup] gnome-initial-setup: no longer starts
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1032448: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1032448
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Mon, 06 Mar 2023 at 17:46:03 -0500, Jeremy Bícha wrote:
> After installing gnome-initial-setup from Unstable on my Debian
> Testing system, gnome-initial-setup no longer starts. When run in a
> terminal, I get a warning about
> Invalid cast from 'GtkBox' to 'GtkListBo
Source: gnome-initial-setup
Version: 43.2-3
Severity: serious
After installing gnome-initial-setup from Unstable on my Debian
Testing system, gnome-initial-setup no longer starts. When run in a
terminal, I get a warning about
Invalid cast from 'GtkBox' to 'GtkListBowRow'
It looks like this issue
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 1032444 src:plastex
Bug #1032444 [plastex] plastex: FTBFS: tests fail with Jinja2 3.1
Bug reassigned from package 'plastex' to 'src:plastex'.
No longer marked as found in versions plastex/2.1-3.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of
Processing control commands:
> forwarded -1 https://github.com/plastex/plastex/commit/d5144e16fcae42
Bug #1032444 [plastex] plastex: FTBFS: tests fail with Jinja2 3.1
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://github.com/plastex/plastex/commit/d5144e16fcae42'.
--
1032444: https://bugs.debian.org/
Package: plastex
Version: 2.1-3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/plastex/plastex/commit/d5144e16fcae42
Dear Maintainer,
Your package FTBFS because tests fail [1].
Previous successful build [2] had this warning:
=== warnings summa
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian...@lists.debian.org
Control: affects 1032316 src:rocm-hipamd
Hello,
Simon McVittie, on 2023-03-03:
> llvm-toolchain-15/1:15.0.7-1 was uploaded several weeks ago, shortly
> after the transition freeze, but has not migrated to testing due to an
> autopkgtest regression (#102901
Processing control commands:
> affects 1032316 src:rocm-hipamd
Bug #1032316 [src:llvm-toolchain-15] llvm-toolchain-15: is this version
intended for Debian 12 'bookworm'?
Added indication that 1032316 affects src:rocm-hipamd
--
1032316: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1032316
D
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # e2fsprogs reverted the defaults change, so this bug applies to trixie
> tag 1031364 - bookworm-ignore
Bug #1031364 [vmdb2] e2fsprogs: generates filesystems that grub-install doesn't
recognize
Removed tag(s) bookworm-ignore.
> tag 1031364 sid tr
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 1032392 https://github.com/scikit-rf/scikit-rf/pull/542
Bug #1032392 [python3-scikit-rf] python3-scikit-rf: import fails:
AttributeError: module 'collections' has no attribute 'Sequence'
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://github.
Your message dated Mon, 06 Mar 2023 18:04:16 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1027542: fixed in epl 0.9-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #1027542,
regarding epl: FTBFS: two tests failed
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is no
David Bremner writes:
> Adrian Bunk writes:
>
>>> FTR, the dates when epl started to FTBFS in sid and bookworm are
>>> a good match for when emacs 1:28.2+1-9 entered sid and bookworm:
>>> https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/epl.html
>>
>> Correct link:
>> https://t
Package: python3-dateutil
Followup-For: Bug #1003044
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-le...@lists.debian.org
(adding debian-legal on cc for any sanity-checks available)
To recap: we have a bug, #1003044, that is rated 'grave', and so it is
considered release-critical for Debian bookworm, although without a w
Adrian Bunk writes:
>> FTR, the dates when epl started to FTBFS in sid and bookworm are
>> a good match for when emacs 1:28.2+1-9 entered sid and bookworm:
>> https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/epl.html
>
> Correct link:
> https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # rauc builds from source again in bookworm
> # adding this for completeness
> affects 1030434 src:rauc
Bug #1030434 {Done: Bastian Germann } [src:opensc] rauc:
FTBFS: tests failed writing: Error opening file
?/tmp/tmp.I4dlWcaK4g/notexisting/out
On 05/03/2023 23:07, Felix Geyer wrote:
On Sun, 05 Mar 2023 18:50:06 +0100 Arnout Vandecappelle
wrote:
This still fails to address the original issue: an irrelevant warning is
printed when performing a fairly mundane thing (requesting a nonexistent
timezone).
That part could be easily fixed
Your message dated Mon, 06 Mar 2023 15:04:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1030511: fixed in libguestfs 1:1.48.6-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1030511,
regarding libguestfs: FTBFS on s390x: timeout
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Package: xsane
Version: 0.999-11ubuntu1
Followup-For: Bug #1013933
Thanks for keeping XSane alive in Debian.
I am a long-time user myself, out of necessity: I have tried several times
to use simple-scan (the only alternative I can find), and it just doesn’t
offer the functionality of XSane. XSane
Upstream bug report created: https://github.com/ganeti/ganeti/issues/1691
Ubuntu bug LP #2009498
Source: libtpms
Version: 0.9.2-3
Severity: grave
Tags: security upstream
X-Debbugs-Cc: car...@debian.org, Debian Security Team
Hi,
The following vulnerabilities were published for libtpms.
CVE-2023-1017[0]:
| An out-of-bounds write vulnerability exists in TPM2.0's Module Library
| allowing writ
Your message dated Mon, 06 Mar 2023 12:49:04 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1019273: fixed in apt 2.6.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #1019273,
regarding apt: Missing licenses and copyright statements in debian/copyright
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the prob
On Thu, 1 Sep 2022 08:13:07 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, 26 Jun 2022 13:55:24 +0200 Salvatore Bonaccorso
wrote:
> Source: salt
> The following vulnerability was published for salt.
>
> CVE-2022-22967[0]:
> | An issue was discovered in SaltStack Salt in versions before 3002.9,
> |
Package: zcfan
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-Cc: deb...@rocketjump.eu
Hi,
while testing the Breaks: directive between zcfan and thinkfan, I noticed that
the zcfan service is not stopped upon uninstall. This is not caught by piuparts,
as by default the zcfan service is not started. The solution is t
Package: nodejs
Followup-For: Bug #1030284
Echoing some notes and findings from the GitHub issue thread:
* https://crbug.com/405338 seems inaccessible to at least two people
* https://codereview.chromium.org/555943003 was initially proposed to resolve
that bug
* https://codereview.chr
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1019273 in apt reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/apt-team/apt/-/commit/5039c586a833b67f00fe5e480bf2f3e074cf7fc
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1019273 [src:apt] apt: Missing licenses and copyright statements in
debian/copyright
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1019273: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1019273
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with probl
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 1032029 normal
Bug #1032029 [mosquitto] mosquitto ignores ip address for websocket listeners
Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1032029: https://bugs.d
severity 1032029 normal
thanks
Hi,
I looked into this as it's the underlying reason for why a bunch of
packages are "flagged for removal" because of "buggy deps
mosquitto".
* Helmut Grohne [Sun Feb 26, 2023 at 08:37:13PM +0100]:
> If you configure a websocket listener for mosquitto with an IP a
30 matches
Mail list logo
