Bug#1031622: marked as done (mke2fs: should not enable orphan_file by default until trixie)

2023-03-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2023 04:04:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1031622: fixed in e2fsprogs 1.47.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1031622, regarding mke2fs: should not enable orphan_file by default until trixie to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#1030939: marked as done (e2fsprogs: generates filesystems that grub-install doesn't recognize)

2023-03-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2023 04:04:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1030939: fixed in e2fsprogs 1.47.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1030939, regarding e2fsprogs: generates filesystems that grub-install doesn't recognize to be marked as done. This means that you claim th

Bug#1031489: why dont work LD_PRELOAD Mesa libGL.so.1?

2023-03-04 Thread Alexander Procenko
why dont work LD_PRELOAD Mesa libGL.so.1? https://pastebin.com/raw/jCgPGPkJ

Bug#1031794: marked as pending in socklog

2023-03-04 Thread Mathieu Mirmont
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1031794 in socklog reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/socklog/-/commit/d97625f9629ff09f920c28948b6abe88e

Processed: Bug#1031794 marked as pending in socklog

2023-03-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1031794 [src:socklog] socklog: fails to extract source package: dpkg-source: error: pathname 'socklog-2.1.0+repack/debian/service/socklog-unix/log/supervise' points outside source root (to '/run/runit/supervise/socklog-unix.log') Ignoring reque

Bug#1031794: marked as pending in socklog

2023-03-04 Thread Mathieu Mirmont
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1031794 in socklog reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/socklog/-/commit/db72a2df3cb141b79921f71229ae66be1

Processed: Bug#1031794 marked as pending in socklog

2023-03-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1031794 [src:socklog] socklog: fails to extract source package: dpkg-source: error: pathname 'socklog-2.1.0+repack/debian/service/socklog-unix/log/supervise' points outside source root (to '/run/runit/supervise/socklog-unix.log') Ignoring reque

Bug#1031794: marked as pending in socklog

2023-03-04 Thread Mathieu Mirmont
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1031794 in socklog reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/socklog/-/commit/1376913ee5564d3cffa2c1bf7359e7c26

Processed: Bug#1031794 marked as pending in socklog

2023-03-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1031794 [src:socklog] socklog: fails to extract source package: dpkg-source: error: pathname 'socklog-2.1.0+repack/debian/service/socklog-unix/log/supervise' points outside source root (to '/run/runit/supervise/socklog-unix.log') Ignoring reque

Bug#1000225: marked as done (golang-github-tidwall-gjson: CVE-2021-42836)

2023-03-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2023 00:49:02 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1000225: fixed in golang-github-tidwall-gjson 1.14.4-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1000225, regarding golang-github-tidwall-gjson: CVE-2021-42836 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#1011616: marked as done (golang-github-tidwall-gjson: CVE-2021-42248 allows attackers to cause a redos via crafted JSON input)

2023-03-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2023 00:49:02 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1011616: fixed in golang-github-tidwall-gjson 1.14.4-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1011616, regarding golang-github-tidwall-gjson: CVE-2021-42248 allows attackers to cause a redos via crafted JSON input

Bug#1011616: RFC: Fixing golang-github-tidwall-gjson's RC bugginess for bookworm

2023-03-04 Thread Thorsten Alteholz
Hi Cyril, On Sun, 5 Mar 2023, Cyril Brulebois wrote: TL;DR, current plan: 1. upload 1.14.4-1 to experimental; 2. watch for fallouts; 3. decide what to consider for unstable and put the release team in the loop. Comments, yay, nay, alternative takes, etc. are welcome! as you seem to have do

Bug#1031794: marked as pending in socklog

2023-03-04 Thread Mathieu Mirmont
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1031794 in socklog reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/socklog/-/commit/2149dca6a73d30af21440152588fcc467

Processed: Bug#1031794 marked as pending in socklog

2023-03-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1031794 [src:socklog] socklog: fails to extract source package: dpkg-source: error: pathname 'socklog-2.1.0+repack/debian/service/socklog-unix/log/supervise' points outside source root (to '/run/runit/supervise/socklog-unix.log') Ignoring reque

Bug#1000225: RFC: Fixing golang-github-tidwall-gjson's RC bugginess for bookworm

2023-03-04 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi, As usual, with my crowdsec maintainer hat, I'm interested in keeping it in testing, and the next problem is golang-github-tidwall-gjson's autoremoval due to its security bugs (cc'd). Currently, we have a 1.6.7 version, those bugs are supposed to be fixed in 1.9.x, and upstream is at 1.14.4…

Bug#1028301: marked as pending in grub2

2023-03-04 Thread Steve McIntyre
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1028301 in grub2 reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/grub-team/grub/-/commit/7fd3d6f6574fe38c0f6f21d6e62837b353c

Processed: Bug#1028301 marked as pending in grub2

2023-03-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1028301 [grub-common] grub: grub-probe doesn't detect that file is on cryptfs on new installation Added tag(s) pending. -- 1028301: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1028301 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.o

Bug#1031489: Xubuntu 23.04 (Lunar Lobster)+ 340.108 + Qt 5.15.8 = ALL QT WORKING GOOD

2023-03-04 Thread Alexander Procenko
Xubuntu 23.04 (Lunar Lobster)+ 340.108 + Qt 5.15.8 = ALL QT WORKING GOOD https://i.imgur.com/BWdskjd.png So its Debian issue?

Bug#1028301: grub: grub-probe doesn't detect that file is on cryptfs on new installation

2023-03-04 Thread Steve McIntyre
Thanks Ben! Looking at these now... On Fri, Mar 03, 2023 at 09:28:26PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: >Control: tag -1 upstream fixed-upstream patch > >On Mon, 09 Jan 2023 12:12:19 +0100 Laurent Bigonville > wrote: >> Package: grub-common >> Version: 2.06-7 >> Severity: serious >> File: /usr/sbin/gr

Bug#1031258: Removal from unstable

2023-03-04 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Ross Gammon] > Thanks for doing this. Removal from unstable is the right thing to do > I think. No-one objected so far, so I guess that is the way we play it. Some time after 2023-03-14 someone should file for removal unless a new maintainer (and perhaps a new upstream) show up very soon. -- H

Bug#1031258: Removal from unstable

2023-03-04 Thread Ross Gammon
Hi Petter, Thanks for doing this. Removal from unstable is the right thing to do I think. Regards, Ross

Bug#1028743: python-bottle: FTBFS: AssertionError: b'OK' != "URLError(ConnectionRefusedError(111, 'Connection refused'))"

2023-03-04 Thread James Addison
Followup-For: Bug #1028743 Control: tags -1 fixed-upstream Note for maintainers: the patch attached to this bug has been merged into the upstream 'release-0.12' branch and is included in the 0.12.5 release. (so hopefully it is possible to drop the patch from packaging for that version onwards) T

Bug#925134: grub-efi-amd64-signed: doesn't mount cryptodisk

2023-03-04 Thread Ben Hutchings
It seems like this bug is related to GRUB lacking LUKS2 support. Back in buster, GRUB only supported LUKS1, so this bug could only be worked- around by using LUKS1 for /boot. Now GRUB has some support for LUKS2 at boot time, but grub-probe doesn't recognise LUKS2 devices properly so the necessary

Bug#926689: cryptsetup-initramfs: config lines in grub.cfg for cryptodisk/luks and other modules missing

2023-03-04 Thread Ben Hutchings
This appears to be the same as #1028301, for which I've attached upstream patchs. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings The two most common things in the universe are hydrogen and stupidity. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Processed: Re: python-bottle: FTBFS: AssertionError: b'OK' != "URLError(ConnectionRefusedError(111, 'Connection refused'))"

2023-03-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 fixed-upstream Bug #1028743 {Done: Louis-Philippe Véronneau } [src:python-bottle] python-bottle: FTBFS: AssertionError: b'OK' != "URLError(ConnectionRefusedError(111, 'Connection refused'))" Added tag(s) fixed-upstream. -- 1028743: https://bugs.debian.org

Processed: severity of 969735 is serious

2023-03-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 969735 serious Bug #969735 [freespace2] freespace2-data-gog: doesn't accept the current GOG installer Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 969735: ht

Processed (with 1 error): forcibly merging 1028722 1030491

2023-03-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forcemerge 1028722 1030491 Bug #1028722 [src:prody] prody: FTBFS: AssertionError: 3205 != 3211 : selection 'abs(x) == sqrt(sq(x))' for Selection 'all' failed, expected 3211, selected 3205 Bug #1030491 [src:prody] prody: FTBFS: AssertionError: 320

Bug#1022015: elasticsearch-curator: diff for NMU version 5.8.1-4.1

2023-03-04 Thread Adrian Bunk
Control: tags 1022015 + pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for elasticsearch-curator (versioned as 5.8.1-4.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/7. Please feel free to tell me if I should cancel it. cu Adrian diff -Nru elasticsearch-curator-5.8.1/debian/changelog elasticsearch-curator-5.8.1

Processed: elasticsearch-curator: diff for NMU version 5.8.1-4.1

2023-03-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags 1022015 + pending Bug #1022015 [src:elasticsearch-curator] elasticsearch-curator: Uses deprecated yaml.load Bug #1026566 [src:elasticsearch-curator] elasticsearch-curator: FTBFS: TypeError: load() missing 1 required positional argument: 'Loader' Added tag(s) p

Bug#1032353: tryton-sao: migrate Build-Dependency away from node-uglify

2023-03-04 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: tryton-sao Severity: serious tryton-sao build depends on node-uglify which is deprecated and will be removed from bookworm very shortly (#958117), please update your (build) dependency in favor of uglifyjs or uglifyjs.terser. https://bugs.debian.org/958117 Paul OpenPGP_signature De

Bug#1030284: nodejs: [arm64] RangeError: Maximum call stack size exceeded

2023-03-04 Thread James Addison
Followup-For: Bug #1030284 There is one part of this patch that worries me, and it is the line: > -//See issue crbug.com/405338 I'm not able to access that bug: neither anonymously nor when logged into my gmail account. The comment would seem to indicate that it contains relevant context ab

Bug#1032244: marked as done (tryton-server 6.0.28-1 causes autopkgtest regression in tryton-modules-stock-location-move)

2023-03-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 4 Mar 2023 12:06:17 +0100 with message-id <20230304120617.5cf45...@monsterix.mbehrle.de> and subject line Re: Bug#1032244: tryton-server 6.0.28-1 causes autopkgtest regression in tryton-modules-stock-location-move has caused the Debian Bug report #1032244, regarding tryton-

Bug#1029821: change gnome-desktop's default choice of Japanese input methods for Debian

2023-03-04 Thread Hideki Yamane
On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 09:42:36 + Simon McVittie wrote: > Is there consensus among Japanese-speaking users of Debian that mozc is > a better default for all Japanese speakers, including new users who are > not familiar with GNOME or Debian? anthy vs mozc : mozc is better to default now - As a