Bug#1024578: mandos: diff for NMU version 1.8.15-1.2

Control: tags 1024578 + pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for mandos (versioned as 1.8.15-1.2) and uploaded it to DELAYED/14. Please feel free to tell me if I should cancel it. cu Adrian diff -Nru mandos-1.8.15/debian/changelog mandos-1.8.15/debian/changelog --- mandos-1.8.15/debian

Processed: mandos: diff for NMU version 1.8.15-1.2

Processing control commands: > tags 1024578 + pending Bug #1024578 [src:mandos] mandos: FTBFS against libgpgme-dev >= 1.18.0-2 Added tag(s) pending. -- 1024578: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1024578 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1024561: Unmaintained, keep out of stable

On Sat, Nov 26, 2022 at 10:34:28AM -0800, Sam Trenholme wrote: >... > If someone can not step up to plate to maintain MaraDNS for Debian, we > should deprecate and eventually remove the package. > > I may end up making my own .deb files for MaraDNS. It would also be an option for you to become th

Bug#1015123: latex-cjk-chinese-arphic: FTBFS: E: Build killed with signal TERM after 150 minutes of inactivity

Ho Hilmar Sorry, I forgot all about this! I figured out it was a regression so in Unstable you need to go two versions back for Fontforge, which will ignore the warnings instead of halting the process. I'll be back home on 30 December. Meanwhile I'll send a message upstream. Thanks for reminding

Bug#1026432: libbase58: Leaf library: keep out of bookworm?

Source: libbase58 Version: 0.1.4-5 Severity: serious libbase58 appears to be a leaf library package - nothing else in Debian debends on it. Apparently it was introduced for some other bitcoin-related libraries, which are gone again. I would suggest we waste no resources on this for bookworm. Inte

Bug#1026227: marked as done (vagrant: Uninstallable in sid with VirtualBox 7.0.x)

Your message dated Tue, 20 Dec 2022 01:27:50 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1026227: fixed in vagrant 2.2.19+dfsg-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1026227, regarding vagrant: Uninstallable in sid with VirtualBox 7.0.x to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#1026431: Remove scalc for bookworm?

Source: scalc Version: 0.2.4-6 Severity: serious It appears src:scalc only builds a library package, and nothing in Debian uses it. If people see value in keeping it in bookworm, please speak up. I'll note that there is a new, completely unrelated project using the "scalc" name, so it might be a

Bug#998889: libcommoncpp2: Remove in bookworm?

* Adrian Bunk : > Source: libcommoncpp2 [..] > src:ucommon is the successor of libcommoncpp2, and the only > remaining build dependency on libcommoncpp2-dev in > vdr-plugin-fritzbox is stale. It appears all r-(build-)deps are gone. Should src:libcommoncpp2 also go away from unstable? Chris

Bug#1026427: jekyll: depends on deprecated and broken ruby-safe-yaml

Package: jekyll Version: 3.9.0+dfsg-5 Severity: serious Tags: upstream Dear Maintainer, Working to get ruby3.1 as the default Ruby version it was noticed that ruby-safe-yaml is incompatible with ruby3.1 and thus deprecated. Most upstreams have dropped their dependencies on it; I checked and jekyl

Bug#1022866: marked as done (libghc-product-isomorphic-doc: depends on non-existing haddock-interface-35)

Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2022 23:36:29 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1026380: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1022866, regarding libghc-product-isomorphic-doc: depends on non-existing haddock-interface-35 to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#1022189: marked as done (Removal notice: obsolete)

Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2022 23:36:29 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1026380: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1022189, regarding Removal notice: obsolete to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#1015150: marked as done (haskell-product-isomorphic FTBFS: The constructor ‘PlainTV’ should have 2 arguments, but has been given 1)

Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2022 23:36:29 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1026380: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1015150, regarding haskell-product-isomorphic FTBFS: The constructor ‘PlainTV’ should have 2 arguments, but has been given 1 to be ma

Bug#1022867: marked as done (libghc-persistable-record-doc: depends on non-existing haddock-interface-35)

Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2022 23:35:59 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1026377: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1022867, regarding libghc-persistable-record-doc: depends on non-existing haddock-interface-35 to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#1022190: marked as done (Removal notice: obsolete)

Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2022 23:35:59 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1026377: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1022190, regarding Removal notice: obsolete to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#982830: marked as done (golang-code.gitea-git: unmaintained go library - keep out of testing)

Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2022 23:34:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1026367: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #982830, regarding golang-code.gitea-git: unmaintained go library - keep out of testing to be marked as done. This means that you clai

Bug#1022192: marked as done (Removal notice: obsolete)

Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2022 23:35:33 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1026378: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1022192, regarding Removal notice: obsolete to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#970915: marked as done (isakmpd: outdated upstream source unacceptable for distribution)

Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2022 23:34:39 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1026370: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #970915, regarding isakmpd: outdated upstream source unacceptable for distribution to be marked as done. This means that you claim tha

Bug#1026365: marked as done (golang-code.gitea-git: unmaintained go library - keep out of testing)

Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2022 23:33:47 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1026366: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1026365, regarding golang-code.gitea-git: unmaintained go library - keep out of testing to be marked as done. This means that you cla

Bug#942281: marked as done (libapache2-mod-ruid2 package missing)

Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2022 23:33:20 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1026363: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #942281, regarding libapache2-mod-ruid2 package missing to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been deal

Bug#866395: marked as done (libapache2-mod-ruid2: Server crashes (Signal 6 aborted) with mod_ruid2 after jessie->stretch update)

Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2022 23:33:20 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1026363: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #866395, regarding libapache2-mod-ruid2: Server crashes (Signal 6 aborted) with mod_ruid2 after jessie->stretch update to be marked as

Bug#906032: marked as done (FTBFS: LaTeX first run problem.)

Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2022 23:32:53 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1026361: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #906032, regarding FTBFS: LaTeX first run problem. to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit

Bug#897761: marked as done (gnuift: ftbfs with GCC-8)

Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2022 23:32:53 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1026361: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #897761, regarding gnuift: ftbfs with GCC-8 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If t

Bug#999724: marked as done (ruby-omniauth-salesforce: FTBFS with ruby-omniauth 2.0.x: ERROR: Test "ruby2.7" failed: /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/rubygems/specification.rb:1404:in `rescue in block in acti

Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2022 23:29:26 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1026266: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #999724, regarding ruby-omniauth-salesforce: FTBFS with ruby-omniauth 2.0.x: ERROR: Test "ruby2.7" failed: /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/r

Bug#999714: marked as done (ruby-omniauth-crowd: FTBFS with ruby-omniauth 2.0.x: ERROR: Test "ruby2.7" failed: /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/rubygems/specification.rb:1404:in `rescue in block in activate_

Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2022 23:29:52 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1026267: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #999714, regarding ruby-omniauth-crowd: FTBFS with ruby-omniauth 2.0.x: ERROR: Test "ruby2.7" failed: /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/rubyge

Bug#931756: marked as done (bindgraph stop action fails)

Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2022 23:32:09 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1026360: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #931756, regarding bindgraph stop action fails to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. I

Bug#806946: marked as done (bindgraph doesn't show any graphic)

Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2022 23:32:09 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1026360: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #806946, regarding bindgraph doesn't show any graphic to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#1013021: marked as done (qscintilla2: ftbfs with GCC-12)

Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2022 23:09:54 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1013021: fixed in qscintilla2 2.13.3+dfsg-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1013021, regarding qscintilla2: ftbfs with GCC-12 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w

Bug#1026297: marked as done (unifrac-tools: Frequent parallel FTBFS)

Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2022 22:22:01 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1026297: fixed in unifrac-tools 1.1.3-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1026297, regarding unifrac-tools: Frequent parallel FTBFS to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dea

Bug#1015123: latex-cjk-chinese-arphic: FTBFS: E: Build killed with signal TERM after 150 minutes of inactivity

Am 27.07.2022 um 12:10 teilte Danai SAE-HAN (韓達耐) mit: Hi Danai, is there progress? Did you get response from upstream? Hilmar Some observations: Going back to fontforge version 20201107~dfsg-4 and its dependencies, I notice the following warning message: 21900/1114292: Add extrema...

Bug#1026057: marked as done (swi-prolog: autopkgtest regression on armel armhf and i386: Segmentation fault)

Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2022 22:20:24 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1026057: fixed in swi-prolog 9.0.3+dfsg-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1026057, regarding swi-prolog: autopkgtest regression on armel armhf and i386: Segmentation fault to be marked as done. This means t

Bug#1026387: marked as done (samba-ad-provision: missing Breaks+Replaces: samba (<< 2:4.17.3+dfsg-4))

Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2022 22:15:30 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1026387: fixed in samba 2:4.17.4+dfsg-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1026387, regarding samba-ad-provision: missing Breaks+Replaces: samba (<< 2:4.17.3+dfsg-4) to be marked as done. This means that you c

Bug#1026349: marked as done (sasview: autopkgtest needs update for new version of numpy: module 'numpy' has no attribute 'asscalar')

Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2022 22:15:47 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1026349: fixed in sasview 5.0.5-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #1026349, regarding sasview: autopkgtest needs update for new version of numpy: module 'numpy' has no attribute 'asscalar' to be marked as don

Bug#1024882: marked as done (scm: FTBFS on armel, armhf and mipsel)

Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2022 22:15:57 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1024882: fixed in scm 5f3-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1024882, regarding scm: FTBFS on armel, armhf and mipsel to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If t

Bug#1026107: marked as done (ruby-asciidoctor-pdf: depends on deprecated ruby-safe-yaml)

Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2022 22:12:55 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1026107: fixed in ruby-asciidoctor-pdf 2.3.4-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1026107, regarding ruby-asciidoctor-pdf: depends on deprecated ruby-safe-yaml to be marked as done. This means that you claim th

Bug#1026326: marked as done (procps breaks pslist autopkgtest)

Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2022 21:29:38 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1026326: fixed in procps 2:4.0.2-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1026326, regarding procps breaks pslist autopkgtest to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#1024835: marked as done (python-pauvre: ftbfs with biopython 1.80)

Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2022 21:31:47 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1024835: fixed in python-pauvre 0.2.3-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1024835, regarding python-pauvre: ftbfs with biopython 1.80 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been d

Bug#1010973: marked as done (python-tesserocr: flaky autopkgtest)

Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2022 21:31:54 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1010973: fixed in python-tesserocr 2.5.2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1010973, regarding python-tesserocr: flaky autopkgtest to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dea

Bug#1026304: marked as done (obantoo build-depends on dropped package.)

Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2022 21:22:15 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1026304: fixed in obantoo 2.1.12+ds1-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #1026304, regarding obantoo build-depends on dropped package. to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been d

Bug#937049: marked as done (mini-buildd: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye)

Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2022 21:19:10 + with message-id and subject line Bug#937049: fixed in mini-buildd 1.9.112 has caused the Debian Bug report #937049, regarding mini-buildd: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been d

Bug#933751: marked as done (mini-buildd (build-)depends on cruft package.)

Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2022 21:19:10 + with message-id and subject line Bug#933751: fixed in mini-buildd 1.9.112 has caused the Debian Bug report #933751, regarding mini-buildd (build-)depends on cruft package. to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#1024183: marked as done (llvm-toolchain-13: autopkgtest regression: /usr/lib/llvm-13/bin/mlir-tblgen doesn't exist)

Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2022 21:16:54 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1024183: fixed in llvm-toolchain-13 1:13.0.1-10 has caused the Debian Bug report #1024183, regarding llvm-toolchain-13: autopkgtest regression: /usr/lib/llvm-13/bin/mlir-tblgen doesn't exist to be marked as do

Bug#1023532: marked as done (llvm-toolchain-13: FTBFS with protobuf 3.21)

Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2022 21:16:54 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1023532: fixed in llvm-toolchain-13 1:13.0.1-10 has caused the Debian Bug report #1023532, regarding llvm-toolchain-13: FTBFS with protobuf 3.21 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#1021705: marked as done (metakernel: build dependency missing in testing: python3-pypandoc)

Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2022 16:02:56 -0500 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1021705: metakernel: build dependency missing in testing: python3-pypandoc has caused the Debian Bug report #1021705, regarding metakernel: build dependency missing in testing: python3-pypandoc to be marke

Bug#1022340: marked as done (redmine: FTBFS: Could not find gem 'csv (~> 3.2.0)' in cached gems or installed locally. The source contains the following gems matching 'csv': csv-3.1.9)

Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2022 23:07:57 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1022340: redmine: FTBFS: Could not find gem 'csv (~> 3.2.0)' in cached gems or installed locally. The source contains the following gems matching 'csv': csv-3.1.9 has caused the Debian Bug report #1022340

Bug#1026338: marked as done (libnet-duo-perl: autopkgtest regression: use strict)

Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2022 21:03:01 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1026338: fixed in libnet-duo-perl 1.02-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1026338, regarding libnet-duo-perl: autopkgtest regression: use strict to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the proble

Bug#1025980: marked as done (texlive-extra breaks latexml autopkgtest: Couldn't convert t/structure/glossary.tex)

Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2022 21:00:34 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1025980: fixed in latexml 0.8.7-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1025980, regarding texlive-extra breaks latexml autopkgtest: Couldn't convert t/structure/glossary.tex to be marked as done. This means that

Processed: Re: Bug#1026326: procps breaks pslist autopkgtest

Processing control commands: > reassign -1 src:procps 2:4.0.2-2 Bug #1026326 [src:procps, src:pslist] procps breaks pslist autopkgtest Bug reassigned from package 'src:procps, src:pslist' to 'src:procps'. No longer marked as found in versions pslist/1.4.0-4 and procps/2:4.0.2-2. Ignoring request t

Bug#1026326: procps breaks pslist autopkgtest

Control: reassign -1 src:procps 2:4.0.2-2 Control: affects -1 src:pslist Hi Craig, On 19-12-2022 06:54, Craig Small wrote: On Mon, 19 Dec 2022 at 03:54, Paul Gevers > wrote: With a recent upload of procps the autopkgtest of pslist fails in testing when that au

Bug#997327: marked as done (jamin: FTBFS: configure: error: cannot find required auxiliary files: compile missing)

Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2022 20:58:15 + with message-id and subject line Bug#997327: fixed in jamin 0.98.9~git20170111~199091~repack1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #997327, regarding jamin: FTBFS: configure: error: cannot find required auxiliary files: compile missing to be marked

Bug#1026344: marked as done (insilicoseq: autopkgtest needs update for new version of numpy: EOFError)

Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2022 20:57:50 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1026344: fixed in insilicoseq 1.5.4-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #1026344, regarding insilicoseq: autopkgtest needs update for new version of numpy: EOFError to be marked as done. This means that you cl

Bug#1026255: marked as done (FTBFS: error: invalid flag: -html4)

Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2022 20:58:51 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1026255: fixed in junit5-system-exit 1.1.2-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #1026255, regarding FTBFS: error: invalid flag: -html4 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been de

Bug#1025309: marked as done (jamin: FTBFS with fftw3 (3.3.10-1))

Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2022 20:58:15 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1025309: fixed in jamin 0.98.9~git20170111~199091~repack1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1025309, regarding jamin: FTBFS with fftw3 (3.3.10-1) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the prob

Bug#1025686: marked as done (Plugin cannot be loaded, not linked against hdf5)

Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2022 20:56:09 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1025686: fixed in hdf5-filter-plugin 0.0~git2022.49e3b65-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1025686, regarding Plugin cannot be loaded, not linked against hdf5 to be marked as done. This means that you c

Bug#1025391: marked as done (hdf5-filter-plugin: missing Breaks+Replaces: bitshuffle)

Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2022 20:56:09 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1025391: fixed in hdf5-filter-plugin 0.0~git2022.49e3b65-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1025391, regarding hdf5-filter-plugin: missing Breaks+Replaces: bitshuffle to be marked as done. This means tha

Bug#1025232: marked as done (hdf5: Build dependencies on openjdk-11 that will not be in bookworm)

Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2022 20:56:00 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1025232: fixed in hdf5 1.10.8+repack1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1025232, regarding hdf5: Build dependencies on openjdk-11 that will not be in bookworm to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#1022796: marked as done (haskell-heist unsatisfiable build-dependency libghc-aeson-dev < 1.5)

Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2022 20:55:29 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1022796: fixed in haskell-heist 1.1.1.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1022796, regarding haskell-heist unsatisfiable build-dependency libghc-aeson-dev < 1.5 to be marked as done. This means that you clai

Bug#998945: marked as done (gnuit: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep)

Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2022 20:52:27 + with message-id and subject line Bug#998945: fixed in gnuit 4.9.5-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #998945, regarding gnuit: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep to be marked as done. This means that you claim th

Bug#965566: marked as done (gnuit: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm)

Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2022 20:52:26 + with message-id and subject line Bug#965566: fixed in gnuit 4.9.5-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #965566, regarding gnuit: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the probl

Bug#1026229: marked as done (efibootguard: missing Breaks+Replaces: libebgenv-dev (<< 0.12-2))

Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2022 20:48:30 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1026229: fixed in efibootguard 0.13-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1026229, regarding efibootguard: missing Breaks+Replaces: libebgenv-dev (<< 0.12-2) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#1024478: marked as done (ecryptfs-utils: FTBFS against libgpgme-dev >= 1.18.0-2 [Cannot locate gpgme])

Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2022 20:48:21 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1024478: fixed in ecryptfs-utils 111-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #1024478, regarding ecryptfs-utils: FTBFS against libgpgme-dev >= 1.18.0-2 [Cannot locate gpgme] to be marked as done. This means that y

Bug#1023688: marked as done (improper permissions on fcgiwrap systemd socket lead to privilege escalation to www-data under default config)

Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2022 20:49:54 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1023688: fixed in fcgiwrap 1.1.0-14 has caused the Debian Bug report #1023688, regarding improper permissions on fcgiwrap systemd socket lead to privilege escalation to www-data under default config to be mark

Bug#1023569: marked as done (librte-net-af-xdp22 is empty after rebuild with libbpf 1.0.1)

Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2022 20:46:13 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1023569: fixed in dpdk 22.11.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1023569, regarding librte-net-af-xdp22 is empty after rebuild with libbpf 1.0.1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the probl

Bug#1023000: marked as done (dpdk: flaky autopkgtest on amd64 and ppc64el: pdump_autotest time out)

Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2022 20:46:13 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1023000: fixed in dpdk 22.11.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1023000, regarding dpdk: flaky autopkgtest on amd64 and ppc64el: pdump_autotest time out to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#1025658: marked as done (libboost-python1.74-dev: Python 3.11 changes break loading of boost-python using extensions)

Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2022 20:41:15 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1025658: fixed in boost1.74 1.74.0-18 has caused the Debian Bug report #1025658, regarding libboost-python1.74-dev: Python 3.11 changes break loading of boost-python using extensions to be marked as done. Thi

Bug#1026337: marked as done (chake: autopkgtest regression: cannot load such file -- chake)

Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2022 20:43:15 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1026337: fixed in chake 0.90.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1026337, regarding chake: autopkgtest regression: cannot load such file -- chake to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the prob

Bug#1021587: marked as done (caddy: FTBFS)

Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2022 20:42:10 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1021587: fixed in caddy 2.5.2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1021587, regarding caddy: FTBFS to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case i

Bug#1014694: marked as done (caddy.service: Failed to determine user credentials: No such process)

Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2022 20:42:10 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1014694: fixed in caddy 2.5.2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1014694, regarding caddy.service: Failed to determine user credentials: No such process to be marked as done. This means that you claim that th

Bug#1013381: marked as done (buildbot: FTBFS with Sphinx 5.0, docutils 0.18: make[2]: *** [Makefile:67: singlehtml] Error 2)

Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2022 20:41:46 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1013381: fixed in buildbot 3.7.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1013381, regarding buildbot: FTBFS with Sphinx 5.0, docutils 0.18: make[2]: *** [Makefile:67: singlehtml] Error 2 to be marked as done. Thi

Bug#1026324: marked as done (asdf-astropy: autopkgtest regression: no tests ran)

Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2022 20:37:17 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1026324: fixed in asdf-astropy 0.3.0+github-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1026324, regarding asdf-astropy: autopkgtest regression: no tests ran to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pr

Bug#1026256: marked as done (backuppc: BackupPC destroys its configuration when you "Save" in the admin web console)

Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2022 20:37:44 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1026256: fixed in backuppc 4.4.0-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #1026256, regarding backuppc: BackupPC destroys its configuration when you "Save" in the admin web console to be marked as done. This means

Bug#1026024: marked as done (specutils: FTBFS, ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'asdf_astropy.io')

Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2022 20:37:17 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1026024: fixed in asdf-astropy 0.3.0+github-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1026024, regarding specutils: FTBFS, ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'asdf_astropy.io' to be marked as done. This means tha

Bug#1026421: rclone should have a build dependency on golang >= 1.17

Package: rclone Version: 1.60.1+dfsg-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) X-Debbugs-Cc: adam.buchbinder+deb...@gmail.com Dear Maintainer, I attempted to set up rclone 1.60 from Debian Testing on a Debian Stable system. Apar

Processed: notfixed 1024180 in 3.0.2-2, fixed 997664 in 6.4.1+dfsg1-1, fixed 1023457 in 6.4.1+dfsg1-1 ...

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > notfixed 1024180 3.0.2-2 Bug #1024180 {Done: David da Silva Polverari } [src:pngcheck] pngcheck: autopkgtest needs update for new version of zlib: warning on stderr No longer marked as fixed in versions pngcheck/3.0.2-2. > fixed 997664 6.4.1+dfs

Processed: Fixing metadata

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 1010120 thrift: FTBFS in bullseye (expired certificates in test suite) Bug #1010120 {Done: Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) } [src:thrift] thrift: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: make -j1 check "TESTSUITEFLAGS=-j1 --verbose" VERBOSE=1 returned exit

Processed: bug 1025825 is forwarded to https://github.com/joeyespo/grip/pull/360

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 1025825 https://github.com/joeyespo/grip/pull/360 Bug #1025825 [grip] ImportError: cannot import name 'safe_join' from 'flask' Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://github.com/joeyespo/grip/pull/360'. > thanks Stopping processing here

Processed: severity of 1025825 is grave

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 1025825 grave Bug #1025825 [grip] ImportError: cannot import name 'safe_join' from 'flask' Severity set to 'grave' from 'important' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1025825: https://bugs.de

Bug#1026387: samba-ad-provision: missing Breaks+Replaces: samba (<< 2:4.17.3+dfsg-4)

19.12.2022 16:32, Michael Tokarev wrote: .. Aargh.  This is due to my attempts to upload security update without waiting for the NEW processing. It *had* proper Breaks+Replaces, but I removed it all in an attempt to clean up new package introduction. Actually it's a lie, it has nothing to do wi

Bug#1024438: mutter: autopkgtest regression: segfault in workspace-basic.metatest

Am 18.12.22 um 16:58 schrieb Simon McVittie: I was unable to reproduce this in a test VM, ... ..., but it is reproducible on my laptop. Perhaps it's only reproducible if mutter has access to some resource that my ssh login session to my test VM lacks, or perhaps there's a race condition that mak

Bug#1026387: [Pkg-samba-maint] Bug#1026387: samba-ad-provision: missing Breaks+Replaces: samba (<< 2:4.17.3+dfsg-4)

19.12.2022 14:29, Andreas Beckmann wrote: Package: samba-ad-provision Version: 2:4.17.3+dfsg-4 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from 'testing'. It installed fine in 'testing', then the u

Processed: tagging 1024438

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1024438 + pending Bug #1024438 [src:mutter] mutter: autopkgtest regression: segfault in workspace-basic.metatest Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1024438: https://bugs.de

Bug#1026227: vagrant: Uninstallable in sid with VirtualBox 7.0.x

Hi! On Sun, 2022-12-18 at 18:10:16 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 06:31:41PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > > Package: vagrant > > Version: 2.2.19+dfsg-2 > > Severity: serious > > Since virtualbox 7.0.4 got uploaded, vagrant is no longer installable > > in Debian sid. I a

Processed: found 1012103 in 9.0.0+r42-1

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 1012103 9.0.0+r42-1 Bug #1012103 [src:android-platform-external-doclava] android-platform-external-doclava: FTBFS with OpenJDK 17 due to com.sun.javadoc removal Marked as found in versions android-platform-external-doclava/9.0.0+r42-1. > t

Processed: tagging 1024478

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1024478 + pending Bug #1024478 [ecryptfs-utils] ecryptfs-utils: FTBFS against libgpgme-dev >= 1.18.0-2 [Cannot locate gpgme] Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1024478: htt

Bug#1026387: samba-ad-provision: missing Breaks+Replaces: samba (<< 2:4.17.3+dfsg-4)

Package: samba-ad-provision Version: 2:4.17.3+dfsg-4 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from 'testing'. It installed fine in 'testing', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails because it tries to ov

Bug#1026386: orangeassassin: FTBFS with Python 3.11

Source: orangeassassin Version: 1.0b-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source Hi, orangeassassin/experimental FTBFS with Python 3.11: fakeroot debian/rules clean dh clean --with python3 --buildsystem=pybuild dh_auto_clean -O--buildsystem=pybuild I: pybuild ba

Bug#1026383: Removal notice: obsolete

Source: haskell-simple-templates Version: 1.0.0-1 Severity: serious I intend to remove the haskell-simple suite from Debian: * It FTBFS with latest aeson, no fix for more than 1 year (see https://github.com/alevy/simple/issues/26) * Seems unmaintained: Home page doesn't work; Last upload

Bug#1026382: Removal notice: obsolete

Source: haskell-simple Version: 1.0.0-1 Severity: serious I intend to remove the haskell-simple-* suite from Debian: * It FTBFS with latest aeson, no fix for more than 1 year (see https://github.com/alevy/simple/issues/26) * Seems unmaintained: Home page doesn't work; Last upload more tha

Processed: Re: Bug#1022189: Removal notice: obsolete

Processing control commands: > clone -1 -2 Bug #1022189 [src:haskell-product-isomorphic] Removal notice: obsolete Bug 1022189 cloned as bug 1026380 > reassign -2 ftp.debian.org Bug #1026380 [src:haskell-product-isomorphic] Removal notice: obsolete Bug reassigned from package 'src:haskell-product-i

Bug#1022189: Removal notice: obsolete

Control: clone -1 -2 Control: reassign -2 ftp.debian.org Control: retitle -2 RM: haskell-product-isomorphic -- ROM; obsolete Control: severity -2 normal Dear FTP masters, please remove haskell-product-isomorphic from unstable. -- Ilias

Processed: Re: Bug#1022192: Removal notice: obsolete

Processing control commands: > clone -1 -2 Bug #1022192 [src:haskell-relational-query] Removal notice: obsolete Bug 1022192 cloned as bug 1026378 > reassign -2 ftp.debian.org Bug #1026378 [src:haskell-relational-query] Removal notice: obsolete Bug reassigned from package 'src:haskell-relational-qu

Processed: Re: Bug#1022190: Removal notice: obsolete

Processing control commands: > clone -1 -2 Bug #1022190 [src:haskell-persistable-record] Removal notice: obsolete Bug 1022190 cloned as bug 1026377 > reassign -2 ftp.debian.org Bug #1026377 [src:haskell-persistable-record] Removal notice: obsolete Bug reassigned from package 'src:haskell-persistab

Bug#1022192: Removal notice: obsolete

Control: clone -1 -2 Control: reassign -2 ftp.debian.org Control: retitle -2 RM: haskell-relational-query -- ROM; obsolete Control: severity -2 normal Dear FTP masters, please remove haskell-relational-query from unstable. -- Ilias

Bug#1022190: Removal notice: obsolete

Control: clone -1 -2 Control: reassign -2 ftp.debian.org Control: retitle -2 RM: haskell-persistable-record -- ROM; obsolete Control: severity -2 normal Dear FTP masters, please remove haskell-persistable-record from unstable. -- Ilias

Bug#1025370: ntcard: ftbfs with nthash 2.3.0

Control: severity -1 important For the time being, I have vendored the relevant header files from nthash in ntcard itseld and patched the buildsystem a bit to pick those up. Ans so, for now, ntcard would "build" (with a compromise) and so I am downgrading the severity. -- Best, Nilesh signatu

Processed: Re: ntcard: ftbfs with nthash 2.3.0

Processing control commands: > severity -1 important Bug #1025370 [src:ntcard] ntcard: ftbfs with nthash 2.3.0 Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' -- 1025370: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1025370 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems