Control: tags -1 + patch
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 02:39:34PM +1100, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> On Sunday, 20 November 2022 6:22:10 PM AEDT Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > > golang.org/x/text/unicode/norm
> > > > # golang.org/x/sys/unix
> > > > vendor/golang.org/x/sys/unix/syscall.go:83:16: unsafe.Slice
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + patch
Bug #1023046 [src:zabbix] zabbix: FTBFS: unsafe.Slice requires go1.17 or later
(-lang was set to go1.16; check go.mod)
Added tag(s) patch.
--
1023046: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1023046
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow..
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1023046 in zabbix reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/zabbix/-/commit/9b2165f1d76219892c6645e5d62ff3c2658
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1023046 [src:zabbix] zabbix: FTBFS: unsafe.Slice requires go1.17 or later
(-lang was set to go1.16; check go.mod)
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1023046: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1023046
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow.
On Sunday, 20 November 2022 6:22:10 PM AEDT Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > golang.org/x/text/unicode/norm
> > > # golang.org/x/sys/unix
> > > vendor/golang.org/x/sys/unix/syscall.go:83:16: unsafe.Slice requires
> > > go1.17 or later (-lang was set to go1.16; check go.mod)
> > > vendor/golang.org/x/sys/un
Source: bash
Version: 5.2-2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
The bash package's copyright file is inaccurate.
It includes the Bash exemption that refers to GPL-2 while Bash was relicensed
to GPL-3 and lost that exemption.
bashref.texi does not have the following as part of its license (anymore?):
Control: tags 1023767 + patch
On Wed 2022-11-09 22:04:00 +0100, Timo Röhling wrote:
> neomutt fails to build with the recent libgpgme-dev update that dropped
> the gpgme-config executable.
>
> https://github.com/neomutt/neomutt/pull/3555 fixes the problem, but does
> not apply cleanly to the neomu
Processing control commands:
> tags 1023767 + patch
Bug #1023767 [src:neomutt] neomutt: unable to find gpgme-config
Added tag(s) patch.
--
1023767: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1023767
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Source: bash
Version: 5.2-2
Severity: serious
The bash source includes doc/aosa-bash-full.pdf which is a non-source file
without corresponding source.
Please remove it additionally to doc/aosa-bash.pdf (already excluded).
You should also add a repack suffix to the upstream version.
Your message dated Mon, 21 Nov 2022 23:06:25 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1024206: fixed in ogre-1.9 1.9.0+dfsg1-14
has caused the Debian Bug report #1024206,
regarding ogre-1.9 FTBFS on armel/armhf with glibc >= 2.32
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Source: r-bioc-demixt
Version: 1.14.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=r-bioc-demixt&ver=1.14.0-1
...
I: Using built-time from d/changelog: Mon, 21 Nov 2022 13:38:58 +0100
mkdir -p /<>/debian/r-bioc-demixt/usr/lib/R/site-library
R CMD I
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1024206 [src:ogre-1.9] ogre-1.9 FTBFS on armel/armhf with glibc >= 2.32
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1024206: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1024206
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1024206 in ogre-1.9 reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/games-team/ogre-1.9/-/commit/b3a8a3297e783607ce824d2aedc
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 src:derpconf
Bug #1024595 [python3-gevent] python3-gevent 22.10.2 must depend on
python3-greenlet >= 2.0.1
Added indication that 1024595 affects src:derpconf
> block -1 by 1024433
Bug #1024595 [python3-gevent] python3-gevent 22.10.2 must depend on
python
Package: python3-gevent
Version: 22.10.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: Jelmer Vernooij
Control: affects -1 src:derpconf
Control: block -1 by 1024433
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=derpconf&arch=all&ver=0.8.3-3&stamp=1669044556&raw=0
...
/usr/bin/make test
make[2]:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 1024499 https://github.com/lofar-astron/PyBDSF/issues/189
Bug #1024499 [src:pybdsf] pybdsf: FTBFS with Python 3.11 as a supported version
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://github.com/lofar-astron/PyBDSF/issues/189'.
> thanks
Stop
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 1024575 with 956423
Bug #1024575 [node-har-validator] node-har-validator: Unmaintained upstream and
useless
1024575 was not blocked by any bugs.
1024575 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 1024575: 956423
> thanks
Stopping p
Your message dated Mon, 21 Nov 2022 21:22:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1024474: fixed in pacman-package-manager 6.0.2-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1024474,
regarding pacman-package-manager_6.0.2-2_mips64el-buildd.changes REJECTED
to be marked as done.
This means that you c
Your message dated Mon, 21 Nov 2022 21:03:29 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#953630: fixed in openbabel 3.1.1+dfsg-7.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #953630,
regarding openbabel autopkg tests fail on non-amd64 architectures
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
Hi,
On 21-11-2022 16:01, Andrius Merkys wrote:
On 2022-11-20 18:18, Paul Gevers wrote:
From the BSP in Tilburg, I uploaded the attached NMU to DELAYED/5.
Please let me know if I should delay more or cancel.
Thanks, IMO this NMU is fine. Similar logic should be applied to the
build time test
Your message dated Mon, 21 Nov 2022 22:01:01 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1024587: alkimia: BD-Uninstallable on s390x
has caused the Debian Bug report #1024587,
regarding alkimia: BD-Uninstallable on s390x
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Upstream here. I should probably summarize the security issues post
2.0.13; MaraDNS is the authoritative server and Deadwood is the
recursive server:
- A theoretical issue with the cryptographic code which doesn’t affect
gcc and clang compiles of Deadwood.
- An issue where a clever attacker could
Source: alkimia
Version: 8.1.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs sid bookworm
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
X-Debbugs-Cc: sramac...@debian.org
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=alkimia
Dependency installability problem for alkimia on s39
Seems to me we could just kick armel out of the supported architectures
for this package for now... I think we'd need to downgrade the severity
of this bug report, and remove the armel package from testing.
What do people think here?
--
Never believe that a few caring people can't change the worl
Your message dated Mon, 21 Nov 2022 18:04:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1023907: fixed in pybluez 0.23-5.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1023907,
regarding pybluez FTBFS with Python 3.11 as supported version
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
On Sat, 19 Nov 2022 12:14:16 +0200 Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Control: tags 1023678 + patch
> Control: tags 1023678 + pending
>
> Dear maintainer,
>
> I've prepared an NMU for clasp (versioned as 3.3.5-4.2) and uploaded
> it to DELAYED/15. Please feel free to tell me if I should cancel it.
This is a
Source: mandos
Version: 1.8.15-1.1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
User: pkg-gnupg-ma...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: gpgme-config-transition
The package relies on gpgme-config to detect gpgme. gpgme-config has
Source: libzypp
Version: 17.25.7-2.2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
User: pkg-gnupg-ma...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: gpgme-config-transition
The package relies on gpgme-config to detect gpgme. gpgme-config has bee
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package laminar
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> # https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/
> #
> user debian-bts-l...@lists.debian.org
Setting
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package src:bazel-bootstrap
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> # https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/
> #
> user debian-bts-l...@lists.debian
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package src:ogre-1.9
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> # https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/
> #
> user debian-bts-l...@lists.debian.org
Se
Source: librepo
Version: 1.12.1-4
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
User: pkg-gnupg-ma...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: gpgme-config-transition^
The package relies on gpgme-config to detect gpgme. gpgme-config has been
Package: node-har-validator
Version: 5.1.5-3
Severity: serious
Tags: security upstream
Justification: Security
X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian Security Team
According to https://www.npmjs.com/package/har-validator this library is
no more maintained. It is used in Debian only for deprecated
node-request and
Axel Beckert:
Hi,
Helmut Grohne wrote:
308 armel
313 armhf
316 i386
613 mipsel
I think it is fairly safe to say that the problem affects 32bit
architectures.
Could this be https://bugs.debian.org/1023286 in fakeroot as well as
Niels pointed out in
https://bugs.debian.org/
On 2022-11-19 Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Control: tags 1022287 + patch
> Control: tags 1022287 + pending
> Dear maintainer,
> I've prepared an NMU for poldi (versioned as 0.4.2+git20161115.553060d-1.1)
> and uploaded it to DELAYED/14. Please feel free to tell me if I should
> cancel it.
[...]
> +pold
Axel Beckert:
Hi Niels,
Niels Thykier wrote:
[...]
It was indeed an oversight.
Yep, looked like that: Was the only occurence far away from the
remaining calls.
Also wondered if that call better should have been a simple
install_file() instead.
The $mode parameter gets in the way. However
Control: tags -1 patch
Hi,
The fix is just a one-liner. If you do not fix it in next seven days,
I will NMU it.
(I prefer not going the delayed queue route)
diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
index 7eff938..fce9cfa 100644
--- a/debian/control
+++ b/debian/control
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ Build-
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 patch
Bug #1024557 [python3-branca] python3-branca: __version__ "unknown" breaks
folium
Added tag(s) patch.
--
1024557: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1024557
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Your message dated Mon, 21 Nov 2022 15:08:21 +
with message-id
and subject line Fixed in 0.20.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1013827,
regarding FTBFS, post-build tests fail on architectures armel and armhf
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Mon, 21 Nov 2022 15:12:02 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1022255: fixed in python-xarray 2022.11.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1022255,
regarding python-xarray breaks satpy autopkgtest
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Mon, 21 Nov 2022 15:12:02 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1023222: fixed in python-xarray 2022.11.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1023222,
regarding python-xarray: autopkgtest regression on s390x: segmentation fault
to be marked as done.
This means that you cla
Your message dated Mon, 21 Nov 2022 15:12:02 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1004869: fixed in python-xarray 2022.11.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1004869,
regarding python-xarray: autopkgtest regression on i386
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem h
Your message dated Mon, 21 Nov 2022 15:05:52 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1019830: fixed in codeblocks 20.03+svn13046-0.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1019830,
regarding codeblocks: Please transition to wxwidgets3.2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
Your message dated Mon, 21 Nov 2022 15:06:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1017211: fixed in facet-analyser
0.0~git20221121142040.6be10b8+ds1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1017211,
regarding facet-analyser: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable:
libinsighttoolkit4-dev
to be
Your message dated Mon, 21 Nov 2022 15:06:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1013158: fixed in facet-analyser
0.0~git20221121142040.6be10b8+ds1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1013158,
regarding facet-analyser: vtk[6,7] removal
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Hi,
On 2022-11-20 18:18, Paul Gevers wrote:
From the BSP in Tilburg, I uploaded the attached NMU to DELAYED/5.
Please let me know if I should delay more or cancel.
Thanks, IMO this NMU is fine. Similar logic should be applied to the
build time tests in future, since now their failures are pl
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 979257 +upstream
Bug #979257 [rabbitvcs-gedit] rabbitvcs-gedit plugin does not load on gedit 3.8+
Added tag(s) upstream.
> forwarded 979257 https://github.com/rabbitvcs/rabbitvcs/issues/34
Bug #979257 [rabbitvcs-gedit] rabbitvcs-gedit plugin
tags 979257 +upstream
forwarded 979257 https://github.com/rabbitvcs/rabbitvcs/issues/34
thanks
There doesn't appear to be much movement on this at all in upstream,
the bug has been open since 2014. There is other upstream activity
though.
Perhaps the best approach would be to drop this specific b
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1024474 + ftbfs
Bug #1024474 [src:pacman-package-manager]
pacman-package-manager_6.0.2-2_mips64el-buildd.changes REJECTED
Added tag(s) ftbfs.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1024474: https://
Your message dated Mon, 21 Nov 2022 13:49:47 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#997874: fixed in django-uwsgi 1.1.2-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #997874,
regarding django-uwsgi: autopkgtest regression: No module named
'django_uwsgi_ng'
to be marked as done.
This means that you clai
Hello Anton, I have just pushed a few dependencies in the -dev package in the
salsa repo
I did not updated the changelog.
Cheers
Fred
Source: form
Version: 4.3.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Forwarded: https://github.com/vermaseren/form/issues/422
https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=form&ver=4.3.0-1
...
reken.c: In function ‘Moebius’:
reken.c:3752:28: error: ‘struct R_const’ has no member named ‘numinprimelist’
37
Source: maradns
Version: 2.0.13-1.4
Severity: serious
The last maintainer upload was in 2015 and the version currently in the
archive is way behind current upstream releases (which is at 3.4.07),
we have plenty of maintained DNS servers, keep it out of testing (
and if noone picks it up, remove it
my few cents: the problem with censorship is, once you start, the
rabbithole is infinite.
Whatever shitty homepage or comment it is, eventually it's just a homepage
or comment.
I think debian-devs should not be going down the rabbithole of scanning all
code for 'bad' words, bad images, suspicious l
Your message dated Mon, 21 Nov 2022 12:51:47 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1003543: fixed in shush 1.2.3-5.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1003543,
regarding shush: crontab path not defined
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If t
Your message dated Mon, 21 Nov 2022 12:50:24 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#996361: fixed in iitalian 1:2.3-3.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #996361,
regarding iitalian: Italian hash file not compatible with current version of
ispell
to be marked as done.
This means that you clai
Your message dated Mon, 21 Nov 2022 12:50:24 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#999201: fixed in iitalian 1:2.3-3.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #999201,
regarding iitalian: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or
build-indep
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Mon, 21 Nov 2022 12:50:24 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#965591: fixed in iitalian 1:2.3-3.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #965591,
regarding iitalian: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that t
Your message dated Mon, 21 Nov 2022 12:51:47 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#934664: fixed in shush 1.2.3-5.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #934664,
regarding shush: fails to send email
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Processing control commands:
> tags 1022292 + patch
Bug #1022292 [src:scute] scute: FTBFS: configure: error:You need libgpg-error
to build this program.
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 1022292 + pending
Bug #1022292 [src:scute] scute: FTBFS: configure: error:You need libgpg-error
to build this progra
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 1022305 with 1023764
Bug #1022305 {Done: Thomas Goirand } [src:networking-l2gw]
networking-l2gw: FTBFS: oslo_config.cfg.NoSuchOptError: no such option
api_extensions_path in group [DEFAULT]
1022305 was not blocked by any bugs.
1022305 was
Package: camv-rnd-core,camv-rnd-doc
Version: 1.1.0-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'testing'.
It installed fine in 'testing', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails
because it tries to ov
Control: tags 1022292 + patch
Control: tags 1022292 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for scute (versioned as 1:1.5.0-1.1) and uploaded
it to DELAYED/14. Please feel free to tell me if I should cancel it.
cu
Adrian
diff -Nru scute-1.5.0/debian/changelog scute-1.5.0/debian/changelo
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 1024008 1024546
Bug #1024008 [python3-spyder] python3-spyder is not installable
Bug #1024546 [python3-spyder] python3-spyder: error when I try to install this
package
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
1024546 was not blocked by a
Your message dated Mon, 21 Nov 2022 12:22:22 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1024015: fixed in python-gevent 22.10.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1024015,
regarding python-gevent FTBFS with Python 3.11 as supported version
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 python3-folium src:osmnx
Bug #1024557 [python3-branca] python3-branca: __version__ "unknown" breaks
folium
Added indication that 1024557 affects python3-folium and src:osmnx
--
1024557: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1024557
Debian Bu
Package: python3-branca
Version: 0.6.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Control: affects -1 python3-folium src:osmnx
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/osmnx.html
...
ERRORS
_ ERRO
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> clone 1023911 -1
Bug #1023911 [src:xdmf] xdmf FTBFS with SWIG 4.1.0
Bug 1023911 cloned as bug 1024555
> reassign -1 swig
Bug #1024555 [src:xdmf] xdmf FTBFS with SWIG 4.1.0
Bug reassigned from package 'src:xdmf' to 'swig'.
No longer marked as found
Your message dated Mon, 21 Nov 2022 11:36:59 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1024303: fixed in zookeeper 3.8.0-10
has caused the Debian Bug report #1024303,
regarding zookeeper: b-d on python3-all-dev, but not built for all supported
Python3 versions
to be marked as done.
This means t
On Sun, Nov 13, 2022 at 12:04:07AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Control: close 1022576 22.2.3-1
>
> On Sat, Nov 05, 2022 at 10:22:18AM +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > Control: retitle -1 llvm-toolchain-15: Mesa on armel,armhf fails with LLVM
> > ERROR: Cannot select
> > Control: tags -1 + patch f
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1024303 [src:zookeeper] zookeeper: b-d on python3-all-dev, but not built
for all supported Python3 versions
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1024303: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1024303
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bug
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1024303 in zookeeper reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/zookeeper/-/commit/c27dcbbca4a2a463e04a1eb609
Personally I find the story of Daryl Davis inspiring, and believe such
approach have higher chances of success than one using contempt and
rejection.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daryl_Davis >
https://www.npr.org/2017/08/20/544861933/how-one-man-convinced-200-ku-klux-klan-members-to-give-up-the
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 732570 ftp.debian.org
Bug #732570 [libarch-perl] libarch-perl should be removed
Bug reassigned from package 'libarch-perl' to 'ftp.debian.org'.
No longer marked as found in versions libarch-perl/0.5.2-1.
Ignoring request to alter fixed ve
reassign 732570 ftp.debian.org
title 732570 RM: libarch-perl -- RoM; few users, dead upstream
user debian-rele...@lists.debian.org
usertag 732570 + bsp-2022-11-nl-tilburg
thanks
Let's remove it - popcon has dropped below 20 at this point
(https://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=libarch-perl) and
close 1023204
thanks
alright, good to know
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 1023204
Bug #1023204 [sssd-ipa] sssd-ipa: sssd fails to start due to broken dependency
Marked Bug as done
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1023204: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cg
close 1012067 5.2.0-1
thanks
forgot to close this via the changelog
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 1012067 5.2.0-1
Bug #1012067 [src:jss] jss: FTBFS with OpenJDK 17: no such provider SunJSSE
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1012067 to the same values
previously set
Bug #1012067 [src:jss] jss: FTBFS with OpenJDK 17: no suc
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> fixed 1012067 5.2.0-1
Bug #1012067 [src:jss] jss: FTBFS with OpenJDK 17: no such provider SunJSSE
Marked as fixed in versions jss/5.2.0-1.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1012067: https://bugs.debi
Hi Niels,
Niels Thykier wrote:
> > Will upload anyway as it clearly improves the situation and we need a
> > fix quickly.
> >
> > Niels: Feel free to improve my fix in the next upload in case I
> > understood some of the new code wrongly.
>
> Thanks for finding and working around the bug.
You'r
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 1023371 normal
Bug #1023371 [plocate] plocate.postint requires a depedency on adduser
Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1023371: https://bugs.debian.o
Hi,
Helmut Grohne wrote:
> 308 armel
> 313 armhf
> 316 i386
> 613 mipsel
>
> I think it is fairly safe to say that the problem affects 32bit
> architectures.
Could this be https://bugs.debian.org/1023286 in fakeroot as well as
Niels pointed out in
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/
83 matches
Mail list logo
