On Sat, Oct 29, 2022 at 04:51:19PM +, Mathias Gibbens wrote:
> Source: zabbix
> Version: 1:6.0.9+dfsg-1.1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS
> Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
>
> While rebuilding the reverse build dependencies of another golang
> package I'm updating, I noticed that zabbix
Hello gcc maintainers,
I believe that you won't have seen any messages to this bug yet, if I
recall correctly how reassignment works with the BTS.
On Sat 19 Nov 2022 at 12:16PM +01, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> The Dependency chain is emacs-gtk -> libgccjit0 -> libgcc-12-dev
> libgcc-12-dev has a R
Processing control commands:
> fixed 1010170 1:28.2+1-6
Bug #1010170 [src:emacs] FTBFS: lisp/net/tramp-archive-tests.log contains
unexpected results
Marked as fixed in versions emacs/1:28.2+1-6.
> fixed 1000744 1:28.2+1-6
Bug #1000744 [src:emacs] emacs: FTBFS on mipsel: Ran 3873 tests, 3786 resul
Control: fixed 1010170 1:28.2+1-6
Control: fixed 1000744 1:28.2+1-6
emacs FTBFS bugs seem to be already fixed in sid.
Thanks,
--
Tatsuya Kinoshita
pgp1LLgv6B2cH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Processing control commands:
> tags 1019638 + patch
Bug #1019638 [src:ruby-memory-profiler] ruby-memory-profiler: FTBFS with
ruby3.1: ERROR: Test "ruby3.1" failed.
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 1019638 + pending
Bug #1019638 [src:ruby-memory-profiler] ruby-memory-profiler: FTBFS with
ruby3.1: ERROR
Control: tags 1019638 + patch
Control: tags 1019638 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for ruby-memory-profiler (versioned as 0.9.14-4.1)
and uploaded it to DELAYED/15. Please feel free to tell me if I should
cancel it.
cu
Adrian
diff -Nru ruby-memory-profiler-0.9.14/debian/change
Your message dated Sun, 20 Nov 2022 00:19:05 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1024313: fixed in amgcl 1.4.3-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1024313,
regarding amgcl: b-d on python3-all-dev, but not built for all supported
Python3 versions
to be marked as done.
This means that you c
Your message dated Sun, 20 Nov 2022 00:06:41 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1024265: fixed in opengv 1.0+1git91f4b1-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #1024265,
regarding opengv: Build for all supported python3 versions or Build-Depend on
python3-dev
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Sun, 20 Nov 2022 00:05:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1022124: fixed in libdbd-oracle-perl 1.80-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1022124,
regarding libdbd-oracle-perl needs binaries uploaded for the perl 5.36
transitions
to be marked as done.
This means that
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 1020258 with 1024431
Bug #1020258 [emacs] emacs: elpa-*: fails to install: libgccjit.so: error:
error invoking gcc driver
1020258 was not blocked by any bugs.
1020258 was blocking: 1017833 1020178 1023297
Added blocking bug(s) of 1020258: 1
Processing control commands:
> tags 1022181 + patch
Bug #1022181 [src:pygccjit] pygccjit: non-standard gcc used for build (gcc-10)
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 1022181 + pending
Bug #1022181 [src:pygccjit] pygccjit: non-standard gcc used for build (gcc-10)
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1022181: https:/
Control: tags 1022181 + patch
Control: tags 1022181 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for pygccjit (versioned as 0.4-12.1) and uploaded
it to DELAYED/14. Please feel free to tell me if I should cancel it.
cu
Adrian
diff -Nru pygccjit-0.4/debian/changelog pygccjit-0.4/debian/change
On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 01:36:11PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Source: haskell-clientsession
> Version: 0.9.1.2-7
> Severity: serious
> Control: affects -1 src:haskell-cipher-aes src:haskell-cprng-aes
>
> haskell-clientsession build depends on haskell-cipher-aes
> and haskell-cprng-aes that have "
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 23:39:53 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1022577: fixed in llvm-toolchain-15 1:15.0.5-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1022577,
regarding llvm-toolchain-15: Mesa on armel,armhf fails with LLVM ERROR: Cannot
select
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 23:39:53 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1023101: fixed in llvm-toolchain-15 1:15.0.5-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1023101,
regarding llvm-15 ftbfs on mips64el
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 1022523
Bug #1022523 [src:lttnganalyses] lttnganalyses: FTBFS: AssertionError: "Error:
Cannot open trace: 'utf-8' codec [53 chars]byte" != 'Timerange: [1970-01-01
00:00:01.[1221 chars]3%\n'
Marked Bug as done
> thanks
Stopping proc
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 1019633 ruby-actionmailer
Bug #1019633 [src:ruby-invisible-captcha] ruby-invisible-captcha: FTBFS with
ruby3.1: ERROR: Test "ruby3.1" failed: cannot load such file -- net/smtp
Bug reassigned from package 'src:ruby-invisible-captc
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 1022343 with 1012496
Bug #1022343 {Done: Abou Al Montacir }
[src:view3dscene] view3dscene: FTBFS: view3dscene.lpr(63,17) Fatal: Can't find
unit CastleCubeMaps used by view3dscene
1022343 was not blocked by any bugs.
1022343 was not blockin
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 23:06:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1023420: fixed in libvirt 8.9.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1023420,
regarding libvirt FTBFS: missing Build-Depends: mount
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been deal
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 1022375 llvm-14-dev
Bug #1022375 [src:halide] halide: FTBFS: make[2]: *** [debian/rules:97:
perform_stage_build] Error 2
Bug reassigned from package 'src:halide' to 'llvm-14-dev'.
No longer marked as found in versions halide/14.0.0-2.
Ig
control: fixed -1 1:15.0.5-1
control: close -1
On Mon, 24 Oct 2022 10:13:01 +0200 Matthias Klose wrote:
Control: reopen -1
Control: found -1 15.0.3-1
> it is fixed in experimental
no, it is not. As said on IRC, there's a reproducer to build cvise 2.6.0-1
without the extra dependencies
Processing control commands:
> fixed -1 1:15.0.5-1
Bug #1022551 [llvm-15-dev] llvm-15's cmake now requires clang-tools-15,
clang-tidy-15, clangd-15, even if unused
Marked as fixed in versions llvm-toolchain-15/1:15.0.5-1.
> close -1
Bug #1022551 [llvm-15-dev] llvm-15's cmake now requires clang-to
Processing control commands:
> tags 1002964 + pending
Bug #1002964 [src:netpanzer] netpanzer: FTBFS with SCons 4.2.0+
Bug #1022356 [src:netpanzer] netpanzer: FTBFS: AttributeError:
'SConsEnvironment' object has no attribute 'has_key':
Added tag(s) pending.
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1002964: http
Control: tags 1002964 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for netpanzer (versioned as 0.8.7+ds-4.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/14. Please feel free to tell me if I should
cancel it.
cu
Adrian
diff -Nru netpanzer-0.8.7+ds/debian/changelog netpanzer-0.8.7+ds/debian/changelog
--- netp
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 1022369
> https://github.com/gpg-rs/gpgme/commit/45297384cf5461307804b82ddcca78af901c8761
Bug #1022369 [src:rust-gpgme] rust-gpgme: FTBFS: sh: 1: gpg-error-config: not
found
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://github.com/gpg-rs
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 1022356 1002964
Bug #1022356 [src:netpanzer] netpanzer: FTBFS: AttributeError:
'SConsEnvironment' object has no attribute 'has_key':
Bug #1022356 [src:netpanzer] netpanzer: FTBFS: AttributeError:
'SConsEnvironment' object has no attri
On 19/11/2022 21.58, Thomas Lange wrote:
On Sat, 19 Nov 2022 13:29:52 +0100, Andreas Beckmann said:
>> From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):
> Preparing to unpack .../dracut-core_057+157-2_amd64.deb ...
> Unpacking dracut-core (057+157-2) over (056-3) ...
>
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 ruby-actionmailer 2:6.1.7+dfsg-2
Bug #1019610 [src:ruby-ahoy-email] ruby-ahoy-email: FTBFS with ruby3.1: ERROR:
Test "ruby3.1" failed: cannot load such file -- net/smtp (LoadError)
Bug reassigned from package 'src:ruby-ahoy-email' to 'ruby-actionmailer'.
Control: reassign -1 ruby-actionmailer 2:6.1.7+dfsg-2
Control: affects -1 src:ruby-ahoy-email
On Sun, Nov 06, 2022 at 08:31:39PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 07, 2022 at 02:16:35PM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> >...
> > But nothing in ruby-ahoy-email codebase uses net/smtp explicitly
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 22:10:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1020064: fixed in tcsh 6.21.00-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1020064,
regarding tcsh: FTBFS: | ./conftest.c:20: undefined reference to `crypt'
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pro
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 22:10:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#999754: fixed in tcsh 6.21.00-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #999754,
regarding tcsh: character class expansion is badly broken
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dea
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1023420 in libvirt reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/libvirt-team/libvirt/-/commit/3f2985672fd96f945e71373e477
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1023420 [src:libvirt] libvirt FTBFS: missing Build-Depends: mount
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1023420: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1023420
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags 1022287 + patch
Control: tags 1022287 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for poldi (versioned as 0.4.2+git20161115.553060d-1.1)
and uploaded it to DELAYED/14. Please feel free to tell me if I should
cancel it.
cu
Adrian
diff -Nru poldi-0.4.2+git20161115.553060d/debian
Processing control commands:
> tags 1022287 + patch
Bug #1022287 [src:poldi] poldi: FTBFS: configure: error: You need libgpg-error
to build this program.
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 1022287 + pending
Bug #1022287 [src:poldi] poldi: FTBFS: configure: error: You need libgpg-error
to build this prog
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 21:22:02 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1022283: fixed in python-wikkid 0.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1022283,
regarding python-wikkid: FTBFS: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named
'breezy.merge3'
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1008502 + bullseye
Bug #1008502 [vdirsyncer] vdirsyncer: Unknown error occured: unmatched ')'
Added tag(s) bullseye.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1008502: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bu
Control: severity -1 important
On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 10:42:01PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Severity: serious
Well, no. You haven't provided a reason and I fail to find an obvious
one as apt's key functionality is hardly effected by a not (by default)
working changelog sub-command… could Debian
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 important
Bug #1024457 [apt] "apt changelog" fails to display the complete changelog
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
--
1024457: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1024457
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.or
Package: pki-base-java
Version: 11.0.3-4
Severity: serious
Please update the dependency to default-jre-headless.
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1022283 in python-wikkid reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/wikkid/-/commit/81ff821dcf412c
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1022283 [src:python-wikkid] python-wikkid: FTBFS: ModuleNotFoundError: No
module named 'breezy.merge3'
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1022283: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1022283
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.deb
> On Sat, 19 Nov 2022 13:29:52 +0100, Andreas Beckmann
> said:
>> From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):
> Preparing to unpack .../dracut-core_057+157-2_amd64.deb ...
> Unpacking dracut-core (057+157-2) over (056-3) ...
> dpkg: error processing archive
/
Source: uwsgi
Version: 2.0.20-4
Severity: serious
openjdk-11 (and therefore uwsgi) is already on the autoremoval list
and will not be in bookworm (only openjdk-17 will be in bookworm).
The uwsgi-plugin-*-openjdk-11 packages need removing
to uwsgi-plugin-*-openjdk-17 (or removal).
I also wonder w
Hi Adam!
On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 07:49:20PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
[...]
>
> I'm assuming the second line is a failed attempt at removing the
> Uploaders field, as mentioned in the changelog, which originally read:
>
> Uploaders: Mathieu Malaterre
>
> Amongst other things, this breaks
Control: tags 1009482 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for sphinxcontrib-autoprogram (versioned as 0.1.7-2.1)
and uploaded it to DELAYED/15. Please feel free to tell me if I should
cancel it.
cu
Adrian
diff -Nru sphinxcontrib-autoprogram-0.1.7/debian/changelog sphinxcontrib-autop
Processing control commands:
> tags 1009482 + pending
Bug #1009482 [src:sphinxcontrib-autoprogram] sphinxcontrib-autoprogram: FTBFS:
dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test -i python{version} -p 3.10 returned exit
code 13
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1009482: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.
Source: seqan-needle
Version: 1.0.1.0.0.git.3011926+ds-2
Severity: serious
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=seqan-needle&arch=all&ver=1.0.1.0.0.git.3011926%2Bds-2&stamp=1668618292&raw=0
...
debian/rules override_dh_auto_build-indep
make[1]: Entering directory '/<>'
cd obj-* && /u
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notfound 1008502 0.18.0-6.2
Bug #1008502 [vdirsyncer] vdirsyncer: Unknown error occured: unmatched ')'
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #1008502 to the same values
previously set
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact m
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 1008502 0.16.8-2
Bug #1008502 [vdirsyncer] vdirsyncer: Unknown error occured: unmatched ')'
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #1008502 to the same values
previously set
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
Package: apt
Version: 2.5.4
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-Cc: Debhelper Maintainers
debhelper recently started removing older changelog entries from
binary packages, but the way to get them with apt does not work:
$ zcat /usr/share/doc/apt/changelog.gz | tail -5
-- Julian Andres Klode Mon, 05
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 20:37:10 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1023227: fixed in breezy 3.3.0+bzr7661-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #1023227,
regarding breezy: autopkgtest regression: Non-UTF-8 code starting with '\xf2'
in file /usr/bin/brz
to be marked as done.
Thi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 1017950 with 950012
Bug #1017950 [librust-prometheus+procfs-dev] librust-prometheus+procfs-dev
depends on non-existent librust-procfs-dev
1017950 was not blocked by any bugs.
1017950 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 10179
user debian-rele...@lists.debian.org
usertag 900821 + bsp-2022-11-nl-tilburg
found 900821 5.10.70-1
fixed 900821 5.10.84-1
thanks
We have/had a BSP in Tilburg today and I went to work on this bug.
With success :-)
I first created a new Bullseye VM with virt-manager using the
debian-11.5.0-amd64-
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> user debian-rele...@lists.debian.org
Setting user to debian-rele...@lists.debian.org (was didi.deb...@cknow.org).
> usertag 900821 + bsp-2022-11-nl-tilburg
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: bsp-2022-11-nl-tilburg.
> found 900821 5.10.7
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 19:47:26 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1024267: fixed in krb5 1.18.3-6+deb11u3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1024267,
regarding krb5: CVE-2022-42898: integer overflows in PAC parsing
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the prob
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 19:49:18 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1024249: fixed in wordpress 5.7.8+dfsg1-0+deb11u2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1024249,
regarding wordpress: update to 5.7.8+dfsg1-0+deb11u1 have missing dependencies
in bullseye-security
to be marked as
Control: tags 997145 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for autoconf2.69 (versioned as 2.69-3.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/15. Please feel free to tell me if I should
cancel it.
cu
Adrian
diff -Nru autoconf2.69-2.69/debian/changelog autoconf2.69-2.69/debian/changelog
--- autoconf
Processing control commands:
> tags 997145 + pending
Bug #997145 [src:autoconf2.69] autoconf2.69: FTBFS: autoconf.texi:9: unknown
command `setcontentsaftertitlepage'
Added tag(s) pending.
--
997145: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=997145
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow..
Processing control commands:
> tags 1022404 + patch
Bug #1022404 [src:raqm] raqm: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: make -j8 check
"TESTSUITEFLAGS=-j8 --verbose" VERBOSE=1 returned exit code 2
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 1022404 + pending
Bug #1022404 [src:raqm] raqm: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: make -j
Control: tags 1022404 + patch
Control: tags 1022404 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for raqm (versioned as 0.7.0-4.1) and uploaded
it to DELAYED/15. Please feel free to tell me if I should cancel it.
cu
Adrian
diff -Nru raqm-0.7.0/debian/changelog raqm-0.7.0/debian/changelog
---
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 1024314 important
Bug #1024314 [src:python-msgpack] python-msgpack: b-d on python3-all-dev, but
not built for all supported Python3
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 java-wrappers 0.3
Bug #1024453 [mediathekview] mediathek: fails to start with openjdk 17
Bug reassigned from package 'mediathekview' to 'java-wrappers'.
No longer marked as found in versions mediathekview/13.2.1+ds-1.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versi
Control: reassign -1 java-wrappers 0.3
Control: affects -1 mediathekview
On 2022-11-19 19:18:14 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Package: mediathekview
> Version: 13.2.1+ds-1
> Severity: grave
> X-Debbugs-Cc: sramac...@debian.org
>
> Since the switch to openjre-17 as default, mediathekview nolo
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 normal
Bug #1024392 [src:gtk+3.0] gtk+3.0: FTBFS on big-endian: some dependency made
border-image-excess-size reftest regress
Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious'
> tags -1 - ftbfs
Bug #1024392 [src:gtk+3.0] gtk+3.0: FTBFS on big-endian: some dependen
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 normal
Bug #1024391 [src:gtk4] gtk4: FTBFS on big-endian: some dependency made
border-image-excess-size reftest regress
Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious'
> tags -1 - ftbfs
Bug #1024391 [src:gtk4] gtk4: FTBFS on big-endian: some dependency made
bor
Control: severity -1 normal
Control: tags -1 - ftbfs
On Fri, 18 Nov 2022 at 18:08:29 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> I'll ignore this test failure for now and downgrade these bugs to non-RC.
gtk+3.0_3.24.34-5 and gtk4_4.8.2+ds-3 ignore this test failure on
big-endian, and were built successfully o
This seems to be the source of the problem:
pdsh@ip-10-84-234-180: module path "/<>/src/modules/.libs"
insecure.
pdsh@ip-10-84-234-180: "/build": Owner not root, current uid, or pdsh
executable owner
pdsh@ip-10-84-234-180: Couldn't load any pdsh modules
Indeed, I can reproduce by building in a
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 18:17:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1023427: fixed in pixman 0.40.0-1.1~deb11u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1023427,
regarding pixman: CVE-2022-44638
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Package: mediathekview
Version: 13.2.1+ds-1
Severity: grave
X-Debbugs-Cc: sramac...@debian.org
Since the switch to openjre-17 as default, mediathekview nolonger
starts:
$ mediathekview
[warning] /usr/bin/mediathekview: No java runtime was found
Cheers
-- System Information:
Debian Release: bo
Hi
Following bug #1023576 and [1], the dependency between raku modules and rakudo
version needs to be tightened.
Until now, every raku-module depends on raku-api- (currently is
raku-api-2022-07). The idea is to lock the pre-compiled files contained in a
raku-module package to a specific rakudo
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 1024261 serious
Bug #1024261 [debhelper] debhelper: dbgsym packages contain directory writable
by build user
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
102
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 1022376
> https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/glib-networking/-/merge_requests/2
Bug #1022376 [src:glib-networking] glib-networking: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error:
cd obj-x86_64-linux-gnu && LC_ALL=C.UTF-8 MESON_TESTTHREADS=8 meson test
Processing control commands:
> tags 1023149 + patch
Bug #1023149 [src:pandoc] pandoc FTBFS on i386
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 1023149 + pending
Bug #1023149 [src:pandoc] pandoc FTBFS on i386
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1023149: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1023149
Debian Bug Tr
Control: tags 1023149 + patch
Control: tags 1023149 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for pandoc (versioned as 2.17.1.1-1.1) and uploaded
it to DELAYED/15. Please feel free to tell me if I should cancel it.
cu
Adrian
diff -Nru pandoc-2.17.1.1/debian/changelog pandoc-2.17.1.1/debia
On Sat, 29 Oct 2022 at 10:57, Felix Geyer wrote:
> I've prepared a fix for building against Sphinx >= 4 and uploaded it to
> DELAYED/5.
> Please feel free to tell me if I should cancel it. The debdiff is attached.
Nah, it's great, thanks for fixing this. I pushed the fix to the repo
and upstream
user debian-rele...@lists.debian.org
usertag 1024084 + bsp-2022-11-nl-tilburg
thank you
--
Mechtilde Stehmann
## Debian Developer
## PGP encryption welcome
## F0E3 7F3D C87A 4998 2899 39E7 F287 7BBA 141A AD7F
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> limit source asterisk
Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing at least one of 'asterisk'
Limit currently set to 'source':'asterisk'
> tags 1024443 + pending
Bug #1024443 [asterisk-modules] asterisk-modules no longer includes chan_sip
whi
user debian-rele...@lists.debian.org
usertag 1024084 + bsp-2022-11-nl-tilburg
thank you
--
Mechtilde Stehmann
## Debian Developer
## PGP encryption welcome
## F0E3 7F3D C87A 4998 2899 39E7 F287 7BBA 141A AD7F
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:44:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1024411: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #998977,
regarding gkrellm-x86info: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch
and/or build-indep
to be marked as done.
This me
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:44:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1024411: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #669731,
regarding [PATCH] gkrellm-x86info: Helping to update to packaging format 3.0
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:44:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1024411: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1002714,
regarding gkrellm-x86info: Obsoleted by gkrellm-cpufreq?
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
Processing control commands:
> forwarded -1 https://github.com/pysam-developers/pysam/issues/1151
Bug #1024425 [src:python-pysam] python-pysam: FTBFS with Python 3.11 as a
supported version
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://github.com/pysam-developers/pysam/issues/1151'.
--
1024425: htt
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/pysam-developers/pysam/issues/1151
Hi Graham,
Graham Inggs, on 2022-11-19:
> python-pysam FTBFS during the recent rebuild adding Python 3.11 as a
> supported version [1].
Thanks for the notice, I informed upstream as my own
investigations did not allow me
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:43:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1024409: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #999301,
regarding vsdump: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or
build-indep
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:41:59 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1024406: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #999150,
regarding cryptcat: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or
build-indep
to be marked as done.
This means tha
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:43:05 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1024408: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #998948,
regarding ibam: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or
build-indep
to be marked as done.
This means that yo
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:42:30 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1024407: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #998928,
regarding scim-canna: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or
build-indep
to be marked as done.
This means t
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:44:02 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1024410: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #965497,
regarding dvbsnoop: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:43:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1024409: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #965868,
regarding vsdump: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim th
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:41:59 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1024406: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #965470,
regarding cryptcat: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:41:59 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1024406: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #670928,
regarding [PATCH] cryptcat: Helping to update to packaging format 3.0
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:41:59 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1024406: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #670928,
regarding [PATCH] cryptcat: Helping to update to packaging format 3.0
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:43:05 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1024408: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #669862,
regarding [PATCH] ibam: Helping to update to packaging format 3.0
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:43:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1024409: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #664396,
regarding [PATCH] vsdump: Helping to update to packaging format 3.0
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:44:02 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1024410: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1005986,
regarding Please migrate away from dpatch
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:42:30 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1024407: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1005984,
regarding Please migrate away from dpatch
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi
Package: asterisk-modules
Version: 1:20.0.0~dfsg+~cs6.12.40431414-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
X-Debbugs-Cc: james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com
The package asterisk-module no longer contains chan_sip.so which means
that all existing SIP configuration with chan_sip s
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:36:25 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1000941: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #975931,
regarding libllvm11: libgpuarray autopkgtest using pocl on armhf triggers
segfault
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:37:56 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1024339: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #853456,
regarding ion: ftbfs with GCC-7
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
1 - 100 of 149 matches
Mail list logo
