Bug#964654: kcov: FTBFS: ld: /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/9/../../../x86_64-linux-gnu/libbfd.a(plugin.o): undefined reference to symbol 'dlclose@@GLIBC_2.2.5'

2022-07-05 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
Dear Alessandro, Any chance you could merge the suggested MR ? Thanks

Processed: reassign 1014352 to lvm2, forcibly merging 1014314 1014352

2022-07-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 1014352 lvm2 Bug #1014352 [initramfs-tools] dpkg: error processing package initramfs-tools (--configure) Bug reassigned from package 'initramfs-tools' to 'lvm2'. No longer marked as found in versions initramfs-tools/0.141. Ignoring reque

Bug#1014323: marked as done (wine-binfmt: postinst fails due to incorrect import directory)

2022-07-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 06 Jul 2022 03:04:01 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1014323: fixed in wine 7.0~repack-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #1014323, regarding wine-binfmt: postinst fails due to incorrect import directory to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the p

Processed: tagging 1013929

2022-07-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1013929 + help Bug #1013929 [src:goffice] src:goffice: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on mips64el Added tag(s) help. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1013929: https://bugs.deb

Processed: reopening 1013929

2022-07-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reopen 1013929 Bug #1013929 {Done: Dmitry Smirnov } [src:goffice] src:goffice: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on mips64el 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; all fixed versions will be cleared

Bug#1014435: libvirt-daemon-system-systemd: virbr0 default fails to connect

2022-07-05 Thread Tim McConnell
Package: libvirt-daemon-system-systemd Version: 8.4.0-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable X-Debbugs-Cc: tmcconnell...@gmail.com Dear Maintainer, Virbr0 won't connect to external network.It did once, I was able to install Debian from a net install image. Now it tells me the V

Processed: Link upstream bug report

2022-07-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 1004628 https://github.com/wang-bin/QtAV/issues/1377 Bug #1004628 [src:qtav] qtav: FTBFS with ffmpeg 5.0 Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://github.com/wang-bin/QtAV/issues/1377'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please

Bug#1012741: Reproduced

2022-07-05 Thread Matthias Maier
Dear all, I think this is an issue with the Hardware token and not with the userland libraries and tools. More specifically, I am able to reproduce this bug with Device type: YubiKey 4 Firmware version: 4.3.7 on a Gentoo system, whereas "reproduce.sh" succeeds with a newer Yubikey:

Processed: Re: Bug#1004587 closed by Debian FTP Masters (reply to Timo Röhling ) (Bug#1004587: fixed in pyglet 1.5.26+ds-1)

2022-07-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reopen -1 Bug #1004587 {Done: Timo Röhling } [src:pyglet] pyglet: FTBFS with ffmpeg 5.0 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them. Bug reopened No longer marked as fix

Bug#1004587: closed by Debian FTP Masters (reply to Timo Röhling ) (Bug#1004587: fixed in pyglet 1.5.26+ds-1)

2022-07-05 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Control: reopen -1 As the dependencies are hard-coded in Depends, the dependencies also need to be updated. Cheers On 2022-07-01 17:21:06 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report > which was filed against the src:pyglet package: > >

Bug#1013662: marked as done (core-async-clojure: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:22: override_dh_auto_test] Error 1)

2022-07-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 05 Jul 2022 22:19:00 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1013662: fixed in core-async-clojure 1.3.610-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #1013662, regarding core-async-clojure: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:22: override_dh_auto_test] Error 1 to be marked as done

Processed: fixed 1011443 in ruby-faker/2.21.0-1

2022-07-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > fixed 1011443 ruby-faker/2.21.0-1 Bug #1011443 {Done: Antonio Terceiro } [ruby-faker] faker,ruby-faker: error when trying to install together Marked as fixed in versions ruby-faker/2.21.0-1. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me i

Processed: notfound 1011793 in python-ecdsa

2022-07-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > notfound 1011793 python-ecdsa Bug #1011793 {Done: Timo Röhling } [src:python-ecdsa] python-ecdsa: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p "3.9 3.10" returned exit code 13 The source 'python-ecdsa' and versi

Processed: fixed 1011443 in 2.21.0-1

2022-07-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > fixed 1011443 2.21.0-1 Bug #1011443 {Done: Antonio Terceiro } [ruby-faker] faker,ruby-faker: error when trying to install together There is no source info for the package 'ruby-faker' at version '2.21.0-1' with architecture '' Unable to make a s

Bug#1013662: marked as pending in core-async-clojure

2022-07-05 Thread Jérôme Charaoui
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1013662 in core-async-clojure reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/clojure-team/core-async-clojure/-/commit/9cbf1

Processed: Bug#1013662 marked as pending in core-async-clojure

2022-07-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1013662 [src:core-async-clojure] core-async-clojure: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:22: override_dh_auto_test] Error 1 Added tag(s) pending. -- 1013662: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1013662 Debian Bug Tracking System Con

Processed: reassign 1011443 to ruby-faker

2022-07-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 1011443 ruby-faker 2.20.0-1 Bug #1011443 {Done: Antonio Terceiro } [faker,ruby-faker] faker,ruby-faker: error when trying to install together Bug reassigned from package 'faker,ruby-faker' to 'ruby-faker'. No longer marked as found in ve

Bug#1011443: marked as done (faker,ruby-faker: error when trying to install together)

2022-07-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 05 Jul 2022 21:34:00 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1011443: fixed in ruby-faker 2.21.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1011443, regarding faker,ruby-faker: error when trying to install together to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the probl

Bug#1011443: faker,ruby-faker: error when trying to install together

2022-07-05 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Tue, Jul 05, 2022 at 06:44:15PM +0200, Timo Röhling wrote: > On Mon, 23 May 2022 01:58:56 +0200 Andreas Beckmann wrote: > > Package: faker,ruby-faker > > Severity: serious > > Tags: sid bookworm > > User: trei...@debian.org > > Usertags: edos-file-overwrite > > Control: found -1 0.9.3-0.1 > > C

Bug#1011708: marked as done (emscripten: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependency: binaryen (< 105+) but 106-1 is to be installed)

2022-07-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 05 Jul 2022 21:06:50 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1011708: fixed in emscripten 3.1.6~dfsg-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #1011708, regarding emscripten: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependency: binaryen (< 105+) but 106-1 is to be installed to be marked as

Bug#1011712: marked as done (olm: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependency: binaryen (< 105+) but 106-1 is to be installed)

2022-07-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 05 Jul 2022 21:06:50 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1011708: fixed in emscripten 3.1.6~dfsg-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #1011708, regarding olm: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependency: binaryen (< 105+) but 106-1 is to be installed to be marked as done.

Bug#1012853: fixed in 2.38.50.20220615-3

2022-07-05 Thread Paul Gevers
Control: fixed -1 2.38.50.20220615-4 On Thu, 16 Jun 2022 11:54:31 +0200 Matthias Klose wrote: Version: 2.38.50.20220615-3 fixed But version -3 isn't mentioned in the changelog in unstable, so the bts doesn't know that unstable has a fixed version. Adding the current unstable version too, a

Processed: Re: fixed in 2.38.50.20220615-3

2022-07-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > fixed -1 2.38.50.20220615-4 Bug #1012853 {Done: Matthias Klose } [binutils-multiarch] binutils-multiarch: Provides /usr/bin/gp-archive (binutils), /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/gprofng/libgp-collector.so (libgprofng0:amd64) Marked as fixed in versions binutils/2.38.50.

Bug#1014423: gnome-books: unmaintained, depends on gnome-online-miners

2022-07-05 Thread Jeremy Bicha
Source: gnome-books Version: 40.0-3 Severity: serious gnome-books has been archived. That means that bug reports, bug fixes, translations, etc. are no longer being accepted for it. https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-books We will likely need to remove gnome-books from Debian soon because its d

Processed: src:zynaddsubfx: fails to migrate to testing for too long: ftbfs on arm64, ppc64el and s390x

2022-07-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > close -1 3.0.6-1 Bug #1014422 [src:zynaddsubfx] src:zynaddsubfx: fails to migrate to testing for too long: ftbfs on arm64, ppc64el and s390x Marked as fixed in versions zynaddsubfx/3.0.6-1. Bug #1014422 [src:zynaddsubfx] src:zynaddsubfx: fails to migrate to testing

Bug#1014422: src:zynaddsubfx: fails to migrate to testing for too long: ftbfs on arm64, ppc64el and s390x

2022-07-05 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: zynaddsubfx Version: 3.0.5-2 Severity: serious Control: close -1 3.0.6-1 Tags: sid bookworm ftbfs User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: out-of-sync Dear maintainer(s), The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing and unstable for more than 60

Bug#1014420: gimp: Missing gir dependencies

2022-07-05 Thread Jeremy Bicha
Source: gimp Version: 2.99.10-1 Severity: serious X-Debbugs-CC: jo...@debian.org gimp won't start if gir1.2-gimp-3.0 and gir1.2-gegl-0.4 aren't installed. They are needed by the Python plugins. Do you think it makes sense to move these plugins to gimp-python like we used to do? https://buildd.de

Processed: your mail

2022-07-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 1014187 fruit: Binary file without a source code Bug #1014187 [fruit] fruit: Binary file inside package Changed Bug title to 'fruit: Binary file without a source code' from 'fruit: Binary file inside package'. > End of message, stopping p

Bug#1014417: meson: test changes causes FTBFS

2022-07-05 Thread Jeremy Bicha
Source: meson Version: 0.63.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch Control: affects -1 src:gjs gjs fails to build from source with the new meson. https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gjs/-/issues/490 The test output was overhauled in the new meson version so maybe that's related. Thank you, Jeremy Bicha

Processed: meson: test changes causes FTBFS

2022-07-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > affects -1 src:gjs Bug #1014417 [src:meson] meson: test changes causes FTBFS Added indication that 1014417 affects src:gjs -- 1014417: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1014417 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1011443: faker,ruby-faker: error when trying to install together

2022-07-05 Thread Timo Röhling
On Mon, 23 May 2022 01:58:56 +0200 Andreas Beckmann wrote: Package: faker,ruby-faker Severity: serious Tags: sid bookworm User: trei...@debian.org Usertags: edos-file-overwrite Control: found -1 0.9.3-0.1 Control: found -1 2.20.0-1 [...] Here is a list of files that are known to be shared by bo

Bug#1014115: uninstall does not properly remove enablement symlinks

2022-07-05 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 04.07.22 um 13:13 schrieb Luca Boccassi: On Mon, 4 Jul 2022 at 11:55, Michael Biebl wrote: Am 04.07.22 um 12:36 schrieb Luca Boccassi: I have uploaded i-s-h, should we close this one now? I've seen the upload. Thanks! I was debating with myself whether systemd-homed should get a tighte

Processed: severity of 1014380 is serious

2022-07-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 1014380 serious Bug #1014380 [ruby-net-ssh] ruby-net-ssh: breaks version expectations of ruby-net-sftp Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1014380:

Processed: Bug#1013485 marked as pending in python-debian

2022-07-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1013485 [python3-debian] lintian-brush: FTBFS: AssertionError: 1 != 0 Added tag(s) pending. -- 1013485: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1013485 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1013485: marked as pending in python-debian

2022-07-05 Thread Jelmer Vernooij
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1013485 in python-debian reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/python-debian-team/python-debian/-/commit/28f640c47

Bug#1004794: marked as done (bs1770gain: FTBFS with ffmpeg 5.0)

2022-07-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 05 Jul 2022 15:18:52 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1004794: fixed in bs1770gain 0.8.4-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1004794, regarding bs1770gain: FTBFS with ffmpeg 5.0 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#1012142: marked as done (r-cran-lamw: FTBFS with onetbb/2021.5.0-8 in experimental)

2022-07-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 05 Jul 2022 14:48:58 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1012142: fixed in r-cran-lamw 2.1.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1012142, regarding r-cran-lamw: FTBFS with onetbb/2021.5.0-8 in experimental to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pro

Processed: Re: r-cran-v8: configure assumes V8_COMPRESS_POINTERS=true but it is not

2022-07-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 important Bug #1013984 [src:r-cran-v8] r-cran-v8: configure assumes V8_COMPRESS_POINTERS=true but it is not Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' -- 1013984: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1013984 Debian Bug Tracking System Cont

Bug#1013984: r-cran-v8: configure assumes V8_COMPRESS_POINTERS=true but it is not

2022-07-05 Thread Nilesh Patra
Control: severity -1 important On Tue, 28 Jun 2022 15:23:08 +0200 =?utf-8?b?SsOpcsOpbXkgTGFs?= wrote: > Source: r-cran-v8 > Version: 4.2.0+dfsg-1 > Severity: serious > Tags: ftbfs > Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) > > When building r-cran-v8 agains

Bug#1009669: marked as done (foliate: Can not open file, "No response" error)

2022-07-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 5 Jul 2022 09:45:14 -0400 with message-id and subject line Re: foliate: Can not open file, "No response" error has caused the Debian Bug report #1009669, regarding foliate: Can not open file, "No response" error to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pro

Bug#1013641: marked as done (apertium-rus-ukr: FTBFS: configure: error: Package requirements (apertium-lex-tools >= 0.2.6) were not met)

2022-07-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 05 Jul 2022 13:33:53 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1013641: fixed in apertium-rus-ukr 0.2.1-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1013641, regarding apertium-rus-ukr: FTBFS: configure: error: Package requirements (apertium-lex-tools >= 0.2.6) were not met to be

Processed: Re: Bug#1013894: findutils: d/copyright: Missing licenses

2022-07-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 1013894 serious Bug #1013894 [src:findutils] findutils: d/copyright: Missing licenses Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1013894: https://bugs.debia

Bug#1011708: marked as done (emscripten: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependency: binaryen (< 105+) but 106-1 is to be installed)

2022-07-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 05 Jul 2022 12:21:25 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1011708: fixed in emscripten 3.1.5~dfsg-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #1011708, regarding emscripten: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependency: binaryen (< 105+) but 106-1 is to be installed to be marked as

Bug#1011712: marked as done (olm: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependency: binaryen (< 105+) but 106-1 is to be installed)

2022-07-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 05 Jul 2022 12:21:25 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1011708: fixed in emscripten 3.1.5~dfsg-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #1011708, regarding olm: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependency: binaryen (< 105+) but 106-1 is to be installed to be marked as done.

Bug#1011712: olm: diff for NMU version 3.2.11~dfsg-1.1

2022-07-05 Thread Evangelos Ribeiro Tzaras
Hi again, On Sat, 2 Jul 2022 03:32:30 +0200 Evangelos Ribeiro Tzaras wrote: > Dear maintainer, > > I've prepared an NMU for olm (versioned as 3.2.11~dfsg-1.1) and > uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I > should delay it longer. It was uploaded and (expectedly) REJECT'ed (b

Processed: reassign 1011712 to src:emscripten, affects 1011712, forcibly merging 1011708 1011712

2022-07-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 1011712 src:emscripten Bug #1011712 [src:olm] olm: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependency: binaryen (< 105+) but 106-1 is to be installed Bug reassigned from package 'src:olm' to 'src:emscripten'. No longer marked as found in versions olm

Bug#1012059: marked as done (bind9: autopkgtest regression on amd64 and armhf: connection refused)

2022-07-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 05 Jul 2022 11:49:13 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1012059: fixed in bind9 1:9.18.4-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1012059, regarding bind9: autopkgtest regression on amd64 and armhf: connection refused to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#1004729: Problem with versions on debian 11 bullseye

2022-07-05 Thread jean-Marie Leroy
(correct an error of my precedent message: On Debian 11 Bullseye, bind9 version is actually 9.16.27 not 9.16.22) It is impossible to use bind9-dyndb-ldap ( version 11-.6.3) on debian 11 bullseye because it try to load libdns-9.16.15-Debian.so and libics-9.16.15-Debian.so whereas the actual v

Bug#1004729: Problem with versions on debian 11 bullseye

2022-07-05 Thread jean-Marie Leroy
It is impossible to use bind9-dyndb-ldap ( version 11-.6.3) on debian 11 bullseye because it try to load libdns-9.16.15-Debian.so and libics-9.16.15-Debian.so whereas the actual version of this libraries is 9.16.22. Make a 'ln -s' (ls -s libdns-9.16.15-Debian.so libdns-9.16.22-Debian.so) fail

Bug#1013890: gmp-ecm breaks sagemath autopkgtest: lots of issues

2022-07-05 Thread Tobias Hansen
Hi, not all tests are expected to pass in sagemath's test suite. The issue is always described at the end: Success: 62 tests failed, up to 100 failures are tolerated Error: critical test failures (e.g. timeout, segfault, etc.) And in the overview above that, it indicates a segfault: sage/src/sa

Bug#1013661: marked as done (apertium-swe-dan: FTBFS: configure: error: Package requirements (apertium-lex-tools >= 0.2.2) were not met)

2022-07-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 05 Jul 2022 08:48:55 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1013661: fixed in apertium-swe-dan 0.8.1-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1013661, regarding apertium-swe-dan: FTBFS: configure: error: Package requirements (apertium-lex-tools >= 0.2.2) were not met to be

Bug#1013644: erlang-p1-tls: FTBFS: test failed

2022-07-05 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 03/07/22 at 12:37 +0200, Philipp Huebner wrote: > Hi Lucas, > > unfortunately I am unable to reproduce this error. > > How do you suggest to continue here? Hi, Can you diff the logs to see if sometimes pops up? Lucas signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#1004597: amide ftbfs with ffmpeg 5.0 - options

2022-07-05 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
On 2022-06-26 23:02:38, Étienne Mollier wrote: > Control: tag -1 help > > Howdy, > > So, I had a look at amide failure to build from source with the > ffmpeg upgrade de version 5.0. The relevant part of the build > log is: > > | /usr/bin/ld: mpeg_encode.o: in function `mpeg_encoding_init'

Bug#998534: closing 998534

2022-07-05 Thread Timo Aaltonen
close 998534 1.26+git20220524-1 thanks

Processed: closing 998534

2022-07-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > close 998534 1.26+git20220524-1 Bug #998534 [src:intel-gpu-tools] intel-gpu-tools: FTBFS: ../lib/meson.build:155:4: ERROR: Function does not take positional arguments. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #998534 to the same values pr

Bug#1013666: marked as done (apertium-srd-ita: FTBFS: configure: error: Package requirements (apertium-lex-tools >= 0.2.7) were not met)

2022-07-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 05 Jul 2022 08:23:01 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1013666: fixed in apertium-srd-ita 1.1.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1013666, regarding apertium-srd-ita: FTBFS: configure: error: Package requirements (apertium-lex-tools >= 0.2.7) were not met to be

Bug#1012741: modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'crc_itu_t': Key was rejected by service

2022-07-05 Thread Ansgar
Hi, On Tue, 2022-07-05 at 09:00 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Mon, Jul 04, 2022 at 10:34:39PM +0200, Ansgar wrote: > > As a further test I tried a different PKCS#11 module: > > Could you try the same with "openssl cms"?  Just to make sure it's > not sign-file itself. I replaced the `./sign-fi

Bug#1013700: Strangely rare pytest 7.x bug report

2022-07-05 Thread Carles Pina i Estany
Hi, On Jul/04/2022, Julian Gilbey wrote: > It is utterly, utterly bizarre. But I think I've found the problem. [...] > Thanks for your help! You're welcome! Cheers, > > Best wishes, > >Julian > > On Mon, Jul 04, 2022 at 08:39:32PM +0100, Carles Pina i Estany wrote: > > > > Hi Juli

Bug#1014305: ruby-net-sftp: Upgrade of ruby-net-ssh to 7.0.1 breaks the package

2022-07-05 Thread Daniele Scasciafratte
I confirm the issue too, but I am on unstable.

Processed (with 2 errors): Re: Bug#1014114: installation of crypt.h in the multiarch location breaks the GCC and LLVM multilib builds

2022-07-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > clone -1 -2 Bug #1014114 [libcrypt-dev] installation of crypt.h in the multiarch location breaks the GCC and LLVM multilib builds Bug 1014114 cloned as bug 1014375 > retitle -2 bootstrap dependency cycle between gcc and libxcrypt: libsanitizer > requires struct cry

Bug#1014114: installation of crypt.h in the multiarch location breaks the GCC and LLVM multilib builds

2022-07-05 Thread Helmut Grohne
Control: clone -1 -2 Control: retitle -2 bootstrap dependency cycle between gcc and libxcrypt: libsanitizer requires struct crypt_data from crypt.h Control: tags -2 = Control: severity -2 important Control: reassign -2 src:libxcrypt,src:gcc-12 Control: user helm...@debian.org Control: usertags -2

Bug#1012741: modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'crc_itu_t': Key was rejected by service

2022-07-05 Thread Bastian Blank
On Mon, Jul 04, 2022 at 10:34:39PM +0200, Ansgar wrote: > As a further test I tried a different PKCS#11 module: Could you try the same with "openssl cms"? Just to make sure it's not sign-file itself. The complete command line I use to create signatures for kernel modules is: | openssl cms -sign