Processed: Bump severity of onetbb FTBFS

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 1011203 serious Bug #1011203 [src:r-cran-markovchain] r-cran-markovchain: FTBFS with onetbb/2021.5.0-8 in experimental Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' > severity 1011218 serious Bug #1011218 [src:r-cran-brms] r-cran-brms: FTBFS w

Bug#1012789: linuxcnc-uspace: Linux CNC will not start

Package: linuxcnc-uspace Version: 2.9.0~pre0+git20220402.2500863908-4 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable X-Debbugs-Cc: vectorhast...@gmail.com Dear Maintainer, *** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate *** * What led up to the situation? I

Bug#1012638: marked as done (rocksdb wrongly optimized for P9 causes SIGILL in binaries using it)

Your message dated Tue, 14 Jun 2022 05:20:09 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1012638: fixed in rocksdb 7.2.2-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #1012638, regarding rocksdb wrongly optimized for P9 causes SIGILL in binaries using it to be marked as done. This means that you claim that t

Bug#1012786: libcamera: Fails to build from source

Source: libcamera Version: 0~git20200629+e7aa92a-8 Severity: serious Justification: Fails to build form source X-Debbugs-Cc: lisan...@debian.org Trying to fix a bug in libcamera I found it's currently failing to build from source. Seems it's taking deprecation warnings as errors. Log follows. Kin

Bug#1012784: python-django FTBFS : FAIL: test_custom_fields (inspectdb.tests.InspectDBTestCase) (again)

Source: python-django Version: 2:4.0.5-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Hi, python-django is currently FTBFSing due to a test failure during build time: --8<---cut here---start->8--- == FAIL: t

Processed: Bug#999768 marked as pending in lintian

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #999768 [lintian] lintian: false report: adopted-extended-field XS-Autobuild Added tag(s) pending. -- 999768: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=999768 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#999768: marked as pending in lintian

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #999768 in lintian reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/-/commit/ac93c6a22ee797bce1700892e399b4d8e

Processed: Re: Bug#995492: lintian: Broken --fails-on=none as default never got reverted

Processing control commands: > tag -1 + moreinfo Bug #995492 [lintian] lintian: Broken --fails-on=none as default never got reverted Added tag(s) moreinfo. > severity -1 important Bug #995492 [lintian] lintian: Broken --fails-on=none as default never got reverted Severity set to 'important' from

Bug#995492: lintian: Broken --fails-on=none as default never got reverted

Control: tag -1 + moreinfo Control: severity -1 important Hi Guillem, I'm trying to catch up with that chaos which is in lintian's current state. Guillem Jover wrote: > So the problematic --fail-on default change never got actually reverted > as the patch applied in commit 3758bfafd5dd742c327f23

Bug#997349: marked as done (flask-migrate: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test -i python{version} -p 3.9 returned exit code 13)

Your message dated Mon, 13 Jun 2022 21:34:25 + with message-id and subject line Bug#997349: fixed in flask-migrate 3.1.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #997349, regarding flask-migrate: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test -i python{version} -p 3.9 returned exit code 13 to be marked

Processed: Bug#997349 marked as pending in flask-migrate

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #997349 [src:flask-migrate] flask-migrate: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test -i python{version} -p 3.9 returned exit code 13 Added tag(s) pending. -- 997349: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=997349 Debian Bug Tracking S

Bug#997349: marked as pending in flask-migrate

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #997349 in flask-migrate reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/flask-migrate/-/commit/777419eb

Processed: unblock 1006348 with 1003272 1007002 1003353

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # Totally unrelated *shrug* > unblock 1006348 with 1003272 1007002 1003353 Bug #1006348 [lintian] lintian: Tag improbable-bug-number-in-closes condition considers 7-digit bug numbers improbable 1006348 was blocked by: 1003272 1003353 1006348 was

Processed: retitle 1003272 to lintian: chokes on overrides with "(" but no ")"

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # Back to the original titles for these unmerged bug reports > retitle 1003272 lintian: chokes on overrides with "(" but no ")" Bug #1003272 [lintian] lintian: Override processing defective for square brackets, parentheses and curly brackets Chan

Bug#1008401: marked as done (haskell-gi-gobject: FTBFS: Haddock failed (no modules?), refusing to create empty documentation package.)

Your message dated Mon, 13 Jun 2022 20:38:23 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1008401: fixed in haskell-gi-gobject 2.0.27-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1008401, regarding haskell-gi-gobject: FTBFS: Haddock failed (no modules?), refusing to create empty documentation package. to be

Bug#992229: marked as done (haskell-gi-gdkpixbuf FTBFS: Could not find module ‘GI.GModule.Structs.Module’)

Your message dated Mon, 13 Jun 2022 20:37:45 + with message-id and subject line Bug#992229: fixed in haskell-gi-gdkpixbuf 2.0.28-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #992229, regarding haskell-gi-gdkpixbuf FTBFS: Could not find module ‘GI.GModule.Structs.Module’ to be marked as done. This mean

Bug#1012774: src:git: fails to migrate to testing for too long: piuparts reports issue

Source: git Version: 1:2.35.1-1 Severity: serious Control: close -1 1:2.36.1-1 Tags: sid bookworm User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: out-of-sync Dear maintainer(s), The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing and unstable for more than 60 days as

Processed: src:git: fails to migrate to testing for too long: piuparts reports issue

Processing control commands: > close -1 1:2.36.1-1 Bug #1012774 [src:git] src:git: fails to migrate to testing for too long: piuparts reports issue Marked as fixed in versions git/1:2.36.1-1. Bug #1012774 [src:git] src:git: fails to migrate to testing for too long: piuparts reports issue Marked

Bug#1012128: marked as done (opencascade: FTBFS with onetbb/2021.5.0-8 in experimental)

Your message dated Mon, 13 Jun 2022 19:04:13 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1012128: fixed in opencascade 7.5.1+dfsg1-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1012128, regarding opencascade: FTBFS with onetbb/2021.5.0-8 in experimental to be marked as done. This means that you claim that t

Bug#1011659: marked as done (opencascade ftbfs against onetbb/experimental: tbb api break)

Your message dated Mon, 13 Jun 2022 19:04:13 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1012128: fixed in opencascade 7.5.1+dfsg1-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1012128, regarding opencascade ftbfs against onetbb/experimental: tbb api break to be marked as done. This means that you claim tha

Bug#1010819: marked as done (python-svg.path: autopkgtest regression)

Your message dated Mon, 13 Jun 2022 19:05:00 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1010819: fixed in python-svg.path 6.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1010819, regarding python-svg.path: autopkgtest regression to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been de

Bug#1012771: python-bids-validator: autopkgtest regression in testing

Source: python-bids-validator Version: 1.9.2-1 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: regression Hi Maintainer Sometime around 2021-12-22, python-bids-validator's autopkgtests regressed in testing [1]. I've copied what I hope is the relevant part of the log below. Regards

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > clone 990345 -1 Bug #990345 [src:zookeeper] zookeeper: various security issues Bug 990345 cloned as bug 1012770 > retitle -1 zookeeper: please add a NEWS.Debian entry in next version Bug #1012770 [src:zookeeper] zookeeper: various security issues

Bug#1012769: intel-mkl: autopkgtest regression in testing

Source: intel-mkl Version: 2020.4.304-2 Severity: serious Tags: bookworm sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: regression Hi Maintainer Sometime around 2021-02-17, intel-mkl's autopkgtests regressed in testing [1]. I've copied what I hope is the relevant part of the log below. Regards

Processed (with 5 errors): cloning 1011659, retitle -1 to opencascade: reenable tbb once upstream ready ...

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > clone 1011659 -1 Bug #1011659 [src:opencascade] opencascade ftbfs against onetbb/experimental: tbb api break Bug #1012128 [src:opencascade] opencascade: FTBFS with onetbb/2021.5.0-8 in experimental Failed to clone 1011659: Bug is marked as being

Processed (with 5 errors): cloning 1012128, retitle -1 to opencascade: reenable tbb once upstream ready ..., tagging 1012128

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > clone 1012128 -1 Bug #1012128 [src:opencascade] opencascade: FTBFS with onetbb/2021.5.0-8 in experimental Bug #1011659 [src:opencascade] opencascade ftbfs against onetbb/experimental: tbb api break Failed to clone 1012128: Bug is marked as being

Processed: [bts-link] source package src:python-svg.path

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package src:python-svg.path > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/ > # > user debian-bts-l...@lists.debian

Bug#942988: marked as done (displaycal: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye)

Your message dated Mon, 13 Jun 2022 17:51:01 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1012750: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #942988, regarding displaycal: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has be

Processed: bump severity of onetbb FTBFS

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 1012127 serious Bug #1012127 [src:flexbar] flexbar: FTBFS with onetbb/2021.5.0-8 in experimental Ignoring request to change severity of Bug 1012127 to the same value. > severity 1011750 serious Bug #1011750 [src:gazebo] gazebo: FTBFS with

Processed: Re: modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'crc_itu_t': Key was rejected by service

Processing control commands: > reassign -1 src:linux-signed-i386 5.10.120+1 Bug #1012741 [src:linux] modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'crc_itu_t': Key was rejected by service Bug reassigned from package 'src:linux' to 'src:linux-signed-i386'. No longer marked as found in versions linux/5.10.120-

Processed: severity of 1011659 is serious

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 1011659 serious Bug #1011659 [src:opencascade] opencascade ftbfs against onetbb/experimental: tbb api break Bug #1012128 [src:opencascade] opencascade: FTBFS with onetbb/2021.5.0-8 in experimental Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'

Processed: tagging 1011659

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1011659 + bookworm sid Bug #1011659 [src:opencascade] opencascade ftbfs against onetbb/experimental: tbb api break Bug #1012128 [src:opencascade] opencascade: FTBFS with onetbb/2021.5.0-8 in experimental Added tag(s) bookworm and sid. Added

Processed: severity of 1011660 is serious

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 1011660 serious Bug #1011660 [src:opensubdiv] opensubdiv ftbfs against onetbb/experimental: tbb api break Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 101166

Bug#1012733: marked as done (racket: should no longer recommend libssl1.1)

Your message dated Mon, 13 Jun 2022 15:46:55 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1012733: fixed in racket 8.5+dfsg1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1012733, regarding racket: should no longer recommend libssl1.1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Processed: severity of 1012127 is serious

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 1012127 serious Bug #1012127 [src:flexbar] flexbar: FTBFS with onetbb/2021.5.0-8 in experimental Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1012127: https://bu

Bug#1012638: Patch proposal

Control: reassign -1 src:rocksdb Control: retitle -1 rocksdb wrongly optimized for P9 causes SIGILL in binaries using it Here is a debdiff introducing a quilt patch and explaining what the issue is. I'm not sure if should be forwarded/fixed upstream... it depends what they want to achieve. It was

Processed: Patch proposal

Processing control commands: > reassign -1 src:rocksdb Bug #1012638 [rocksdb] balboa: FTBFS on ppc64el Bug reassigned from package 'rocksdb' to 'src:rocksdb'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #1012638 to the same values previously set Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug

Bug#996235: marked as done (ruby-gitlab-fog-azure-rm: FTBFS with ruby3.0: ERROR: Test "ruby3.0" failed: ArgumentError: tried to create Proc object without a block)

Your message dated Mon, 13 Jun 2022 12:49:26 + with message-id and subject line Bug#996235: fixed in ruby-gitlab-fog-azure-rm 1.2.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #996235, regarding ruby-gitlab-fog-azure-rm: FTBFS with ruby3.0: ERROR: Test "ruby3.0" failed: ArgumentError: tried to create

Bug#1012693: marked as done (snmpd fails to install due to trying to chown an inexistent file)

Your message dated Mon, 13 Jun 2022 11:34:11 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1012693: fixed in net-snmp 5.9.1+dfsg-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #1012693, regarding snmpd fails to install due to trying to chown an inexistent file to be marked as done. This means that you claim tha

Bug#1012638: issue in rocksdb on ppc64

Control: reassign -1 rocksdb Hi, this is actually an issue in latest rocksdb 7.2.2-3 that got compiled with -mcpu=power9 -mtune=power9 which is not good in Debian, because we want to be power8 compatible (Debian's gcc defaults). (which is not the case in Ubuntu which optimize for Power9 and thus b

Processed: issue in rocksdb on ppc64

Processing control commands: > reassign -1 rocksdb Bug #1012638 [src:balboa] balboa: FTBFS on ppc64el Bug reassigned from package 'src:balboa' to 'rocksdb'. No longer marked as found in versions balboa/2.0.0+ds-4. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1012638 to the same values previou

Processed: Re: Bug#880220: Fixed in upload

Processing control commands: > found -1 2017.11.24 Bug #880220 [leap-archive-keyring] should not install a globally valid trust anchor Marked as found in versions leap-archive-keyring/2017.11.24. > found -1 2017.11.24+nmu1 Bug #880220 [leap-archive-keyring] should not install a globally valid tru

Processed: Bug#1012693 marked as pending in net-snmp

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1012693 [src:net-snmp] snmpd fails to install due to trying to chown an inexistent file Added tag(s) pending. -- 1012693: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1012693 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with pr

Bug#1012693: marked as pending in net-snmp

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1012693 in net-snmp reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/net-snmp/-/commit/0adb04bbfb5a8087ca1ef8e53b12df0

Bug#1010432: marked as done (debian-edu-config: autopkgtest regression: update-mime: not found)

Your message dated Mon, 13 Jun 2022 10:48:56 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1010432: fixed in debian-edu-config 2.12.22 has caused the Debian Bug report #1010432, regarding debian-edu-config: autopkgtest regression: update-mime: not found to be marked as done. This means that you clai

Bug#1010432: marked as pending in debian-edu-config

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1010432 in debian-edu-config reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/debian-edu/debian-edu-config/-/commit/88b0f3ba8

Processed: Bug#1010432 marked as pending in debian-edu-config

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1010432 [src:debian-edu-config] debian-edu-config: autopkgtest regression: update-mime: not found Added tag(s) pending. -- 1010432: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1010432 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.o

Processed: Reassigning to astroplan

Processing control commands: > notfound -1 astropy/5.1-1 Bug #1012719 [src:astropy, src:astroplan] astropy breaks astroplan autopkgtest: No module named 'astropy.tests.plugins' No longer marked as found in versions astropy/5.1-1. > reassign -1 src:astroplan Bug #1012719 [src:astropy, src:astropla

Bug#1012719: Reassigning to astroplan

Control: notfound -1 astropy/5.1-1 Control: reassign -1 src:astroplan The backward-compatible plugin ``astropy.tests.plugins.display`` has been removed in Astropy 5.1; use ``pytest-astropy-header`` instead. This has been fixed in the new release astropy 0.8, which I would ask you to upload. A

Processed: tagging 1012326, tagging 1012690, tagging 1012464, tagging 1001317, tagging 1012221, tagging 1011807 ...

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1012326 + sid bookworm Bug #1012326 [src:python-jenkinsapi] python-jenkinsapi: build-depends on pylint3 Added tag(s) sid and bookworm. > tags 1012690 + sid bookworm Bug #1012690 [src:pagetools] pagetools: FTBFS with netpbm11 Added tag(s) book

Bug#1012498: marked as done (finalcif: FTBFS with python3-gemmi 0.5.5+ds)

Your message dated Mon, 13 Jun 2022 07:18:55 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1012498: fixed in finalcif 106+dfsg-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1012498, regarding finalcif: FTBFS with python3-gemmi 0.5.5+ds to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Processed: block 1009781 with 984865

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 1009781 with 984865 Bug #1009781 [wnpp] ITP: safe-vdash -- the Safe Network - node dashboard 1009781 was not blocked by any bugs. 1009781 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 1009781: 984865 > thanks Stopping processing here.