Your message dated Thu, 24 Mar 2022 05:34:06 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1005772: fixed in go-rpmdb 0.0~git20210911.73bd0ce-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1005772,
regarding go-rpmdb: trying to overwrite '/usr/bin/rpmdb', which is also in
package rpm
to be marked as done.
Thi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 984008 1006919
Bug #984008 [src:cbmc] cbmc: ftbfs with GCC-11
Bug #1006919 [src:cbmc] src:cbmc FTBFS
Added tag(s) ftbfs.
Merged 984008 1006919
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1006919: ht
Source: meson
Version: 0.62.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
The new meson version breaks things that uses the gnome module to
update the icon cache.
Specifically, it requires gtk4-update-icon-cache which is only
recommended by gtk4 and the Debian buildds don't install recommends by
default. How
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1008180 + pending
Bug #1008180 [src:php-pear] php-pear : Depends: php-archive-tar (>= 1.4.9) but
it is not installable
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1008180: https://b
On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 09:21:57AM -0400, Joe Nahmias wrote:
> Hello Ondřej,
>
> Firstly, thanks for all your work on packaging PHP for Debian!
>
> I noticed that the recent php-pear upload to Debian unstable,
> 1:1.10.13+submodules+notgz+2022032201-1, is uninstallable due to a bad dep on
> php-a
Your message dated Wed, 23 Mar 2022 21:56:56 -0400
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1008188: reportbug is unusable, can't be run without
sudo
has caused the Debian Bug report #1008188,
regarding reportbug is unusable, can't be run without sudo
to be marked as done.
This means that you c
Package: reportbug
Version: 11.4
Severity: grave
Basically reportbug is broken.
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/reportbug", line 39, in
from reportbug import utils
File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/reportbug/utils.py", line 70, in
from . import debbugs # noqa:
Your message dated Thu, 24 Mar 2022 01:03:49 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1006039: fixed in pytest-xdist 2.5.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1006039,
regarding pytest-xdist: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test
--test-pytest -i python{version} -p "3.10 3.9" returned exit
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notfound 1008180 1:1.10.12+submodules+notgz+20210212-1
Bug #1008180 [src:php-pear] php-pear : Depends: php-archive-tar (>= 1.4.9) but
it is not installable
No longer marked as found in versions
php-pear/1:1.10.12+submodules+notgz+20210212-1.
> f
Source: pandas
Version: 1.3.5+dfsg-3
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bookworm
numba is not ready for python 3.10 (#1000336) and is being removed for
the upcoming transition. Please disable the numba tests until that is
fixed as otherwise pandas is not buildable in bookworm.
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramac
Source: php-pear
Version: 1:1.10.12+submodules+notgz+20210212-1
Severity: serious
Justification: uninstallable / unsatisfied Depends
X-Debbugs-Cc: car...@debian.org
Hi
It looks php-pear got a new Depends which makes the package
uninstallable:
# apt-get install php-pear
Reading package lists... D
Your message dated Wed, 23 Mar 2022 20:41:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1005545: fixed in gcr 3.40.0-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1005545,
regarding gcr: FTBFS: ../gck/meson.build:130:2: ERROR: gnome.generate_gir got
unknown keyword arguments "packages"
to be marked as done
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1005545 in gcr reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/gcr/-/commit/cb063fab972029bc66fe64b0e3256017e4ee4
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1005545 [src:gcr] gcr: FTBFS: ../gck/meson.build:130:2: ERROR:
gnome.generate_gir got unknown keyword arguments "packages"
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1005545: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1005545
Debian Bug Tracking System
Co
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 997445 + experimental
Bug #997445 {Done: Nicolas Boulenguez } [src:libaunit]
libaunit: FTBFS: '! LaTeX Error: File `tgtermes.sty' not found.'
Added tag(s) experimental.
> tags 997410 + experimental
Bug #997410 {Done: Nicolas Boulenguez }
On 23/03/2022 18.43, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
Adding mutual Conflicts is not a valid solution here!
For the moment, it will be my option. :-/
With zero rdepends that's somewhat acceptable.
It seems upb is not fully
mature and recently I can't install it with cmake. Might be the reaso
Hi,
On 23-03-2022 12:32, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Quoting Anthony Fok (2022-03-23 11:08:36)
Rather than keeping this "Serious" bug open and keeping both gitsome
and gh out of Debian testing, I think the simple solution of having gh
"Conflicts: gitsome", which is one of the option specified in
ht
Hi Rajendra
On Sun, 6 Mar 2022 at 12:42, Rajendra Kharat1 wrote:
> Could you please share the steps to reproduce the issue.
> As when I am trying to reproduce I ran into different problem of segmentation
> fault.
> Below are the steps that I followed.
> 1. Install python3-xarray on debian on s39
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 +pending
Bug #1008150 [libgrpc-dev] libgrpc-dev: library name conflict with libupb-dev:
libupb.so*
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1008150: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1008150
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with pro
Control: tags -1 +pending
On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 10:57 AM Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install
> because it tries to overwrite other packages files.
[...]
> upb and grpc seem to be two unrelated projects, unfortunately
> grpc/experimental
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 1007737 src:golang-github-yuin-goldmark-highlighting
Bug #1007737 {Done: Anthony Fok }
[src:golang-github-alecthomas-chroma,src:golang-github-yuin-goldmark-highlighting]
golang-github-alecthomas-chroma breaks
golang-github-yuin-goldmar
Hold your horses.
On 23-03-2022 07:44, Paul Gevers wrote:
Last time [1], I just CC'ed ftpmaster and the magic happened, so dear
ftpmasters, can you do "that" again?
win32-loader is blocked behind grub2 now. I'm not aware of progress with
bug #1001057 (in CC).
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Descri
Hi Jerome,
On 23-03-2022 09:14, Jerome Kieffer wrote:
I am the upstream author of pyFAI and the release 0.21.1 is a bugfix
for the regressions spotted by the debian CI on a couple of 32-bit
computer architectures (thanks to debian for that).
Thus I don't understand why the migration from unstab
Your message dated Wed, 23 Mar 2022 15:22:57 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#998980: fixed in gnu-standards 2022.03.23-0.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #998980,
regarding gnu-standards: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch
and/or build-indep
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Wed, 23 Mar 2022 15:22:57 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#965564: fixed in gnu-standards 2022.03.23-0.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #965564,
regarding gnu-standards: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in
bookworm
to be marked as done.
This means that
Source: python-confluent-kafka
Version: 1.7.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-s...@lists.debian.org, ol...@debian.org
Hi Maintainer
Since the upload of 1.7.0-1, python-confluent-kafka FTBFS on s390x and
some other big-endian architectures (e.g. powerpc, ppc64) [1]. I've
copi
Package: node-openid
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS
node-openid test randomly fails. I added a "trace-warning" in test to
see from where comes this failure.
node-openid implements OpenID 1.0/1.1/2.0 protocols, all deprecated in
favor of OpenID-Connect. This package has no reve
23.03.2022 16:38, Diederik de Haas wrote:
On woensdag 23 maart 2022 06:54:57 CET Axel Beckert wrote:
Gian Piero Carrubba wrote:
Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)
Diederik de Haas wrote:
I do not have a /run/samba/ directory on my Bookworm system/server.
I don't think it's relevant, but it (sti
On woensdag 23 maart 2022 06:54:57 CET Axel Beckert wrote:
> Gian Piero Carrubba wrote:
> > Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)
>
> Diederik de Haas wrote:
> > I do not have a /run/samba/ directory on my Bookworm system/server.
> > I don't think it's relevant, but it (still?) has sysv-init as init.
>
VA, please provide a tested patch against our VCS
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/xscreensaver
thanks
Your message dated Wed, 23 Mar 2022 13:11:34 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: os-autoinst: FTBFS: test failure
has caused the Debian Bug report #1004818,
regarding os-autoinst: FTBFS: test failure
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If t
Your message dated Wed, 23 Mar 2022 12:00:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#997410: fixed in libtemplates-parser 22.0.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #997410,
regarding libtemplates-parser: FTBFS: '! LaTeX Error: File `tgtermes.sty' not
found.'
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Wed, 23 Mar 2022 12:00:10 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#997445: fixed in libaunit 22.0.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #997445,
regarding libaunit: FTBFS: '! LaTeX Error: File `tgtermes.sty' not found.'
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
Quoting Anthony Fok (2022-03-23 11:08:36)
> Rather than keeping this "Serious" bug open and keeping both gitsome
> and gh out of Debian testing, I think the simple solution of having gh
> "Conflicts: gitsome", which is one of the option specified in
> https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-
Your message dated Wed, 23 Mar 2022 11:33:52 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1008148: fixed in esdm 1.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1008148,
regarding esdm: missing Build-Depends: cmake
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If thi
Your message dated Wed, 23 Mar 2022 11:24:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1008139: fixed in node-evp-bytestokey 1.0.3-11
has caused the Debian Bug report #1008139,
regarding FTBFS: fail to build with nodejs >= 14
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1008139 [node-evp-bytestokey] FTBFS: fail to build with nodejs >= 14
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1008139: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1008139
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1008139 in node-evp-bytestokey reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-evp-bytestokey/-/commit/048d2652
Your message dated Wed, 23 Mar 2022 10:33:57 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1005858: fixed in gh 2.4.0+dfsg1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1005858,
regarding gh,gitsome: File conflict, both ship /usr/bin/gh
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has bee
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1005858 in gh reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/gh/-/commit/ddd2a18bd88467d4587816bab74ff7341
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1005858 [gh,gitsome] gh,gitsome: File conflict, both ship /usr/bin/gh
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1005858: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1005858
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Source: gprbuild
Version: 2022.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Hi,
gprbuild/experimental FTBFS during a binary-indep build. (A combined
binary build works fine as does a binary-arch build.)
[...]
looking for now-o
Hi everyone,
On Sat, Feb 26, 2022 at 7:09 PM Paul Wise wrote:
>
> Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/donnemartin/gitsome/issues/177
>
> On Sat, 26 Feb 2022 23:43:14 +0800 SZ Lin (林上智) wrote:
>
> > The "gitsome" has used "gh" since 2017, and thus would you mind renaming
> > the "gh" in your
Package: libgrpc-dev
Version: 1.44.0-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install
because it tries to overwrite other packages files.
>From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):
Preparing
Package: esdm
Version: 1.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source
esdm FTBFS in a minimal buildd chroot:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=esdm&arch=arm64&ver=1.0-1&stamp=1645887435&raw=0
debian/rules override_dh_auto_configure
make[1]: Entering
Your message dated Wed, 23 Mar 2022 03:25:18 -0600
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1007734: fixed in golang-github-niklasfasching-go-org
1.6.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1007734,
regarding golang-github-alecthomas-chroma breaks
golang-github-niklasfasching-go-org autopkgtest: hashe
Your message dated Wed, 23 Mar 2022 10:07:09 +0100
with message-id <8301f7c6-beeb-a264-3b24-5d43a5541...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#1008141: FTBFS: unable to use
iconv with nodejs >= 14
has caused the Debian Bug report #1008141,
regarding FTBFS: unable to use iconv
Quoting Yadd (2022-03-23 09:44:42)
> Similar error found with node-sqlite3:
Please mark the bugreport with "affects" in posts like the above.
- Jonas
--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
[x] quote me freely [ ] ask before
On 23/03/2022 09:29, Yadd wrote:
Package: nodejs
Version: 16.13.2+really14.19.1~dfsg-5
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS
During node-iconv rebuild, test fails:
node --trace-uncaught test/run-tests.js
internal/util/comparisons.js:386
memos.val1.delete(val1);
Similar error
On 23/03/2022 09:44, Yadd wrote:
On 23/03/2022 09:29, Yadd wrote:
Package: nodejs
Version: 16.13.2+really14.19.1~dfsg-5
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS
During node-iconv rebuild, test fails:
node --trace-uncaught test/run-tests.js
internal/util/comparisons.js:386
memos.
Your message dated Wed, 23 Mar 2022 08:34:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1008140: fixed in node-chai 4.3.6~ds1+~cs9.7.12-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1008140,
regarding mocha: Incompatible with current node-chai
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
Your message dated Wed, 23 Mar 2022 08:34:02 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1000491: fixed in frama-c 20211203-chromium-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1000491,
regarding FTBFS with Why3 1.4.0
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
It seems that it failing now
https://ci.debian.net/packages/p/pyfai/
I am on 0.21.2 but I do not know if it solve this mask issue.
Cheers
Fred
Package: nodejs
Version: 16.13.2+really14.19.1~dfsg-5
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS
During node-iconv rebuild, test fails:
node --trace-uncaught test/run-tests.js
internal/util/comparisons.js:386
memos.val1.delete(val1);
^^
SyntaxError: Unexpected token '
Dear Paul,
I am the upstream author of pyFAI and the release 0.21.1 is a bugfix
for the regressions spotted by the debian CI on a couple of 32-bit
computer architectures (thanks to debian for that).
Thus I don't understand why the migration from unstable to testing is
blocked, especially that th
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1008140 in node-chai reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-chai/-/commit/169b9960baf613dea1474babb917
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1008140 [chai] mocha: Incompatible with current node-chai
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1008140: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1008140
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> affects 1008140 node-esquery
Bug #1008140 [chai] mocha: Incompatible with current node-chai
Added indication that 1008140 affects node-esquery
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1008140: https://bugs.
Hi,
On Mon, 21 Mar 2022 11:14:47 +0100 Bernhard Schmidt
wrote:
Hi,
unfortunately this is still happening in 2.0.4-2
https://ci.debian.net/packages/o/openvpn-auth-ldap/unstable/amd64/
Right now this would be preventing the new version of openvpn to migrate
(I can retry of course).
Bernhard
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 1008140 chai
Bug #1008140 [mocha] mocha: Incompatible with current node-chai
Bug reassigned from package 'mocha' to 'chai'.
No longer marked as found in versions node-mocha/9.2.2+ds1+~cs28.3.8-1.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions o
Package: mocha
Version: 9.2.2+ds1+~cs28.3.8-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS
During node-esquery rebuild, mocha fails:
undefined ERROR: Error [ERR_PACKAGE_PATH_NOT_EXPORTED]: Package subpath
'./register-assert' is not defined by "exports" in
/usr/share/node_modules/chai/pack
Package: node-evp-bytestokey
Version: 1.0.3-10
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS
Hi,
node-evp-bytestokey fails to build with libnode-dev >= 14. See
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/n/node-evp-bytestokey/20258806/log.gz
--- 8< ---
../test/main.cc: In f
Processing control commands:
> close -1 1.0.21-12
Bug #1008138 [src:freecontact] src:freecontact: fails to migrate to testing for
too long: FTBFS on armel
Marked as fixed in versions freecontact/1.0.21-12.
Bug #1008138 [src:freecontact] src:freecontact: fails to migrate to testing for
too long:
Source: freecontact
Version: 1.0.21-11
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 1.0.21-12
Tags: sid bookworm ftbfs
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more tha
64 matches
Mail list logo
