Bug#1004843: debina bullseye: ping (from iputils-ping) throwing inappropriate error message if IPv6 is disabled

2022-02-01 Thread Binarus
Package: iputils-ping Version: 3:20210202-1 Severity: critical Tags: fixed-upstream ipv6 bullseye Owner: no...@debian.org O/S: Debian bullseye 11.2 Kernel: Linux binkg-vpn01 5.10.0-11-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 5.10.92-1 (2022-01-18) x86_64 GNU/Linux When I invoke ping, it throws an inappropriate erro

Processed: tagging 1004223

2022-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1004223 + upstream fixed-upstream Bug #1004223 {Done: Salvatore Bonaccorso } [minetest-server] minetest-server: ItemStack meta injection vulnerability in Minetest (CVE-2022-24300) Added tag(s) upstream and fixed-upstream. > thanks Stopping

Processed: retitle 1004223 to minetest-server: ItemStack meta injection vulnerability in Minetest (CVE-2022-24300)

2022-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 1004223 minetest-server: ItemStack meta injection vulnerability in > Minetest (CVE-2022-24300) Bug #1004223 {Done: Salvatore Bonaccorso } [minetest-server] minetest-server: ItemStack meta injection vulnerability in Minetest 5.3 Changed B

Processed: Re: Bug#989384: acpi-call-dkms: new version of linux-call-dkms in https://github.com/nix-community/acpi_call

2022-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 989384 important Bug #989384 [acpi-call-dkms] acpi-call-dkms: new version of linux-call-dkms in https://github.com/nix-community/acpi_call Severity set to 'important' from 'critical' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me

Processed: glurp: diff for NMU version 0.12.3-1.1

2022-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags 96 + patch Bug #96 [src:glurp] glurp: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm Added tag(s) patch. > tags 96 + pending Bug #96 [src:glurp] glurp: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm Added tag(s) pending. --

Bug#965555: glurp: diff for NMU version 0.12.3-1.1

2022-02-01 Thread Joao Eriberto Mota Filho
Control: tags 96 + patch Control: tags 96 + pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for glurp (versioned as 0.12.3-1.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/10. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer or cancel the upload. Regards, Eriberto diff -u glurp-0.12.3/debian/chang

Processed: tagging 1002367

2022-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1002367 + pending Bug #1002367 [src:python-pygal] python-pygal: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p "3.10 3.9" returned exit code 13 Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please

Bug#1004780: marked as done (gnome-initial-setup: FTBFS in unstable)

2022-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 01 Feb 2022 23:33:55 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1004780: fixed in gnome-initial-setup 41.2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1004780, regarding gnome-initial-setup: FTBFS in unstable to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has bee

Bug#1004761: marked as done (gnome-control-center: FTBFS)

2022-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 01 Feb 2022 23:33:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1004761: fixed in gnome-control-center 1:41.2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1004761, regarding gnome-control-center: FTBFS to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Processed: Bug#1004780 marked as pending in gnome-initial-setup

2022-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1004780 [src:gnome-initial-setup] gnome-initial-setup: FTBFS in unstable Added tag(s) pending. -- 1004780: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1004780 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1004780: marked as pending in gnome-initial-setup

2022-02-01 Thread Simon McVittie
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1004780 in gnome-initial-setup reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/gnome-initial-setup/-/commit/47167

Bug#1004212: closing 1004212

2022-02-01 Thread Daniel Gröber
close 1004212 1.01+20211229git48498af+dfsg-2 thanks Fixe by https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/berkeley-abc/-/commit/cf6ed6eb2ce4b9ea0494d4d145f8bc1a6d47d2f5 Thanks, --Daniel

Processed: closing 1004212

2022-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > close 1004212 1.01+20211229git48498af+dfsg-2 Bug #1004212 [src:berkeley-abc] berkeley-abc: autopkgtest regression on arm64, i386 and ppc64el: Segmentation fault Marked as fixed in versions berkeley-abc/1.01+20211229git48498af+dfsg-2. Bug #1004212

Processed: Re: [Pkg-shadow-devel] Bug#1004710: passwd: 4.11.1 breaks mmdebstrap testsuite by empty directories in /var/mail and /var/spool/mail

2022-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #1004710 [passwd] passwd: 4.11.1 breaks mmdebstrap testsuite by empty directories in /var/mail and /var/spool/mail Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' -- 1004710: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1004710 Debian Bug Trac

Bug#1004662: prosody: postinst keeps messing with snakeoil certs

2022-02-01 Thread Martin
On 2022-01-31 12:21, Julien Cristau wrote: > prosody's postinst seems to insist on creating > /etc/prosody/certs/localhost.{crt,key}, but does this in a fragile way. There have been a number of prosody package bugs related to snakeoil certs. I wonder, if it is worth the trouble? For most real wor

Bug#997558: marked as done (golang-github-mattermost-xml-roundtrip-validator: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: cd obj-x86_64-linux-gnu && go test -vet=off -v -p 4 github.com/mattermost/xml-roundtrip-valida

2022-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 01 Feb 2022 23:04:45 + with message-id and subject line Bug#997558: fixed in golang-github-mattermost-xml-roundtrip-validator 0.1.0-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #997558, regarding golang-github-mattermost-xml-roundtrip-validator: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: cd o

Bug#1004761: marked as pending in gnome-control-center

2022-02-01 Thread Simon McVittie
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1004761 in gnome-control-center reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/gnome-control-center/-/commit/38c

Processed: Bug#1004761 marked as pending in gnome-control-center

2022-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1004761 [src:gnome-control-center] gnome-control-center: FTBFS Added tag(s) pending. -- 1004761: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1004761 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#997558: marked as pending in golang-github-mattermost-xml-roundtrip-validator

2022-02-01 Thread Thorsten Alteholz
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #997558 in golang-github-mattermost-xml-roundtrip-validator reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages

Processed: Bug#997558 marked as pending in golang-github-mattermost-xml-roundtrip-validator

2022-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #997558 [src:golang-github-mattermost-xml-roundtrip-validator] golang-github-mattermost-xml-roundtrip-validator: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: cd obj-x86_64-linux-gnu && go test -vet=off -v -p 4 github.com/mattermost/xml-roundtrip-validator githu

Bug#1004818: os-autoinst: FTBFS: test failure

2022-02-01 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Source: os-autoinst Version: 4.6.1632799442.f77d4e1-1 Severity: serious X-Debbugs-Cc: sramac...@debian.org Tags: sid bookworm ftbfs os-autoinst FTBFS in unstable: Start 3: test-perl-testsuite 3: Test command: /<>/tools/invoke-tests "--prove-tool" "/usr/bin/prove" "--make-tool" "/usr/bin/nin

Bug#1003847: binutils breaks glibc autopkgtest on ppc64el: unrecognized opcode: `vspltisb' (and others)

2022-02-01 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On 2022-02-01 16:02, Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho wrote: > Aurelien Jarno writes: > > > On 2022-01-19 22:08, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > >> Hi Aurelien! > >> > >> Unfortunately, glibc no longer builds with this change on powerpc and ppc64 > >> and kernel builds still fails on both tar

Bug#1004216: marked as done (missing directory: /usr/share/fonts/truetype/)

2022-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 01 Feb 2022 22:04:38 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1004216: fixed in fonts-ipaexfont 00401-4.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1004216, regarding missing directory: /usr/share/fonts/truetype/ to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem h

Bug#1004781: marked as done (ros-perception-pcl: FTBFS in unstable)

2022-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 01 Feb 2022 21:50:54 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1004781: fixed in ros-perception-pcl 1.7.3-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1004781, regarding ros-perception-pcl: FTBFS in unstable to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#1004798: libpdb-redo FTBFS with libcifpp 2.0.4

2022-02-01 Thread Adrian Bunk
Source: libpdb-redo Version: 1.0.2-3 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=libpdb-redo&ver=1.0.2-3%2Bb2 ... src/BondMap.cpp: In function ‘void mmcif::createBondInfoFile(const std::filesystem::__cxx11::path&, const std::filesystem::__cxx11::path&)’: src/BondM

Bug#1004790: avifile: should this package be removed?

2022-02-01 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Source: avifile Version: 1:0.7.48~20090503.ds-21 Severity: serious X-Debbugs-Cc: sramac...@debian.org Tags: sid bookworm Upstream development of avifile has ceased over a decode ago. Given that avifile fails to build with ffmpeg 5.0 (see ##1004789) as it did with all the previous major releases of

Bug#1004765: marked as done (ros-image-pipeline: FTBFS)

2022-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 01 Feb 2022 21:19:42 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1004765: fixed in ros-image-pipeline 1.16.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1004765, regarding ros-image-pipeline: FTBFS to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with

Processed: found 1004752 in 2:3.2.11-2, found 1004752 in 2:3.2.10-2, found 1004752 in 2:2.2.25-1~deb11u1 ...

2022-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 1004752 2:3.2.11-2 Bug #1004752 {Done: Chris Lamb } [python-django] python-django: CVE-2022-22818 CVE-2022-23833 There is no source info for the package 'python-django' at version '2:3.2.11-2' with architecture '' Unable to make a source v

Bug#996414: python-fastimport: autopkgtest regression: 2 failures + lots of RuntimeError: maximum recursion depth exceeded

2022-02-01 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi, On 31-01-2022 21:19, Paul Gevers wrote: If nobody beats me to it, I'll upload an NMU dropping the pypy based autopkgtest in a couple of days. I have created a MR [1] and have uploaded to DELAYED/5. Paul [1] https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/python-fastimport/-/merge_requests

Bug#1004781: ros-perception-pcl: FTBFS in unstable

2022-02-01 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Source: ros-perception-pcl Version: 1.7.3-2 Severity: serious X-Debbugs-Cc: sramac...@debian.org Tags: sid bookworm ftbfs ros-perception-pcl FTBFS in unstable: cd /<>/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/pcl_ros && /usr/lib/ccache/c++ -DBOOST_ALL_NO_LIB -DBOOST_ATOMIC_DYN_LINK -DBOOST_DATE_TIME_DYN_LINK -DBOOS

Bug#1004780: gnome-initial-setup: FTBFS in unstable

2022-02-01 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Source: gnome-initial-setup Version: 41.2-1 Severity: serious X-Debbugs-Cc: sramac...@debian.org Tags: sid bookworm ftbfs gnome-initial-setup FTBFS in unstable: Configuring config.h using configuration Configuring gnome-initial-setup-copy-worker.desktop.in using configuration ../data/meson.build

Bug#1004765: ros-image-pipeline: FTBFS

2022-02-01 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Source: ros-image-pipeline Version: 1.16.0-1 Severity: serious X-Debbugs-Cc: sramac...@debian.org Tags: sid bookworm ftbfs ros-image-pipeline fails to build: | cd /<>/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/image_view && /usr/lib/ccache/c++ -DROSCONSOLE_BACKEND_LOG4CXX -DROS_BUILD_SHARED_LIBS=1 -DROS_PACKAGE_NAME=

Bug#1004562: libguestfs: autopkgtest regression

2022-02-01 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi, On Sun, 30 Jan 2022 17:07:53 +0200 Adrian Bunk wrote: https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/libg/libguestfs/18786402/log.gz ... + ssh -oUserKnownHostsFile=/dev/null -oStrictHostKeyChecking=no -i id_rsa -T -p 10022 -o ConnectTimeout=5 root@localhost echo success Connection t

Bug#1004761: gnome-control-center: FTBFS

2022-02-01 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Source: gnome-control-center Version: 1:41.2-1 Severity: serious X-Debbugs-Cc: sramac...@debian.org Tags: sid bookworm ftbfs gnome-control-center FTBFS in unstable: | Configuring gnome-applications-panel.desktop.in using configuration | | ../panels/applications/meson.build:10:5: ERROR: Function do

Processed: tagging 1004654, tagging 1004299, tagging 1004517, tagging 1004532, tagging 1004531, tagging 1004463 ...

2022-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1004654 + sid bookworm Bug #1004654 [ruby-rack-mount] ruby-rack-mount: FTBFS with ruby-rack 2.2.3 "http://josh.backpackit.com/host";>(UTF-8) expected but was <"http://example.org/host";>(ASCII-8BIT) Added tag(s) sid and bookworm. > tags 100

Bug#1003847: binutils breaks glibc autopkgtest on ppc64el: unrecognized opcode: `vspltisb' (and others)

2022-02-01 Thread Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho
Aurelien Jarno writes: > On 2022-01-19 22:08, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: >> Hi Aurelien! >> >> Unfortunately, glibc no longer builds with this change on powerpc and ppc64 >> and kernel builds still fails on both targets: >> >> > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=glibc&arch=po

Bug#1004729: bind9-dyndb-ldap: fails to load dyndb-ldap backend

2022-02-01 Thread Timo Aaltonen
l3mm.0x kirjoitti 1.2.2022 klo 12.35: > Package: bind9-dyndb-ldap > Version: 11.6-3 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > Dear Maintainer, > > after an upgrade from buster to bullseye my previously working > bind9-dyndb-ldap > installation dosn't work anymore. > > It s

Bug#984171: marked as done (haskell-gtk: ftbfs with GCC-11)

2022-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 01 Feb 2022 18:48:46 + with message-id and subject line Bug#984167: fixed in c2hs 0.28.8-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #984167, regarding haskell-gtk: ftbfs with GCC-11 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this i

Bug#984176: marked as done (haskell-pango: ftbfs with GCC-11)

2022-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 01 Feb 2022 18:48:46 + with message-id and subject line Bug#984167: fixed in c2hs 0.28.8-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #984167, regarding haskell-pango: ftbfs with GCC-11 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this

Bug#984174: marked as done (haskell-glib: ftbfs with GCC-11)

2022-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 01 Feb 2022 18:48:46 + with message-id and subject line Bug#984167: fixed in c2hs 0.28.8-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #984167, regarding haskell-glib: ftbfs with GCC-11 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this

Bug#984173: marked as done (haskell-gtk3: ftbfs with GCC-11)

2022-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 01 Feb 2022 18:48:46 + with message-id and subject line Bug#984167: fixed in c2hs 0.28.8-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #984167, regarding haskell-gtk3: ftbfs with GCC-11 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this

Bug#984172: marked as done (haskell-gio: ftbfs with GCC-11)

2022-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 01 Feb 2022 18:48:46 + with message-id and subject line Bug#984167: fixed in c2hs 0.28.8-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #984167, regarding haskell-gio: ftbfs with GCC-11 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this i

Bug#984170: marked as done (haskell-cairo: ftbfs with GCC-11)

2022-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 01 Feb 2022 18:48:46 + with message-id and subject line Bug#984167: fixed in c2hs 0.28.8-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #984167, regarding haskell-cairo: ftbfs with GCC-11 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this

Bug#984169: marked as done (haskell-gi-cairo-render: ftbfs with GCC-11)

2022-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 01 Feb 2022 18:48:46 + with message-id and subject line Bug#984167: fixed in c2hs 0.28.8-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #984167, regarding haskell-gi-cairo-render: ftbfs with GCC-11 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit

Bug#984168: marked as done (haskell-bz2: ftbfs with GCC-11)

2022-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 01 Feb 2022 18:48:46 + with message-id and subject line Bug#984167: fixed in c2hs 0.28.8-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #984167, regarding haskell-bz2: ftbfs with GCC-11 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this i

Bug#984167: marked as done (c2hs fails with code preprocessed by gcc-11)

2022-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 01 Feb 2022 18:48:46 + with message-id and subject line Bug#984167: fixed in c2hs 0.28.8-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #984167, regarding c2hs fails with code preprocessed by gcc-11 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi

Processed: src:scm: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on armel, armhf and mipsel

2022-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > close -1 5f3-1 Bug #1004757 [src:scm] src:scm: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on armel, armhf and mipsel Marked as fixed in versions scm/5f3-1. Bug #1004757 [src:scm] src:scm: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on armel, armhf and mips

Bug#1004757: src:scm: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on armel, armhf and mipsel

2022-02-01 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: scm Version: 5f2-2 Severity: serious Control: close -1 5f3-1 Tags: sid bookworm ftbfs User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: out-of-sync Dear maintainer(s), The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing and unstable for more than 60 days as hav

Processed: src:python-confluent-kafka: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on s390x

2022-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > close -1 1.7.0-1 Bug #1004756 [src:python-confluent-kafka] src:python-confluent-kafka: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on s390x Marked as fixed in versions python-confluent-kafka/1.7.0-1. Bug #1004756 [src:python-confluent-kafka] src:python-confluent

Bug#1004756: src:python-confluent-kafka: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on s390x

2022-02-01 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: python-confluent-kafka Version: 1.3.0-2 Severity: serious Control: close -1 1.7.0-1 Tags: sid bookworm ftbfs User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: out-of-sync Dear maintainer(s), The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing and unstable for m

Processed: Re: Bug#984167: Possibly fixed upstream

2022-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 pending Bug #984167 [c2hs] c2hs fails with code preprocessed by gcc-11 Bug #984168 [c2hs] haskell-bz2: ftbfs with GCC-11 Bug #984169 [c2hs] haskell-gi-cairo-render: ftbfs with GCC-11 Bug #984170 [c2hs] haskell-cairo: ftbfs with GCC-11 Bug #984171 [c2hs] haske

Bug#984167: Possibly fixed upstream

2022-02-01 Thread Apollon Oikonomopoulos
Control: tags -1 pending Verified this and the fix, pending upload. Also, I should have read the instructions better and add a blocking bug rather than reassign/merge. Apologies for the inconvenience doko and company, I'll do verification builds myself and I promise I'll be more careful next t

Bug#1004752: marked as done (python-django: CVE-2022-22818 CVE-2022-23833)

2022-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 01 Feb 2022 17:49:41 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1004752: fixed in python-django 2:3.2.12-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1004752, regarding python-django: CVE-2022-22818 CVE-2022-23833 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#1004752: marked as done (python-django: CVE-2022-22818 CVE-2022-23833)

2022-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 01 Feb 2022 17:34:19 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1004752: fixed in python-django 2:4.0.2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1004752, regarding python-django: CVE-2022-22818 CVE-2022-23833 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#1004752: python-django: CVE-2022-22818 CVE-2022-23833

2022-02-01 Thread Chris Lamb
Package: python-django Version: 1:1.10.7-2+deb9u14 X-Debbugs-CC: t...@security.debian.org Severity: grave Tags: security Hi, The following vulnerabilities were published for python-django: * CVE-2022-22818: Possible XSS via {% debug %} template tag The {% debug %} template tag didn't properly

Processed: closing 1002183

2022-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > close 1002183 8.2.0-1 Bug #1002183 [src:minexpert2] minexpert2: FTBFS: MzIntegrationParamsDlg.cpp:181:27: error: ‘class pappso::MzIntegrationParams’ has no member named ‘isApplySavGolFilter’ Marked as fixed in versions minexpert2/8.2.0-1. Bug #1

Processed: Merge all Haskell GCC-11 FTBFS bugs under c2hs

2022-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 984168 c2hs Bug #984168 [src:haskell-bz2] haskell-bz2: ftbfs with GCC-11 Bug reassigned from package 'src:haskell-bz2' to 'c2hs'. No longer marked as found in versions haskell-bz2/1.0.0.1-2. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug

Bug#1004748: guestfs-tools ftbfs with new ocaml

2022-02-01 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: src:guestfs-tools Version: 1.46.1-4 Severity: serious Tags: sid bookworm guestfs-tools ftbfs with new ocaml [...] Use the equivalent signed form: +C+D+E+F+L+M+P+S+U+V+Y+Z+X+52-3. Hint: Enabling or disabling a warning by its mnemonic name requires a + or - prefix. Hint: Did you make a sp

Bug#984167: Possibly fixed upstream

2022-02-01 Thread Apollon Oikonomopoulos
Control: reassign -1 c2hs Control: retitle -1 c2hs fails with code preprocessed by gcc-11 Control: found -1 0.28.6-1 Control: tags -1 upstream fixed-upstream Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/haskell/c2hs/issues/268 Hi Rob, On 15:57 Fri 03 Dec , Rob Moss wrote: > I believe this is caus

Processed: Re: Bug#984167: Possibly fixed upstream

2022-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reassign -1 c2hs Bug #984167 [src:haskell-alsa-mixer] haskell-alsa-mixer: ftbfs with GCC-11 Bug reassigned from package 'src:haskell-alsa-mixer' to 'c2hs'. No longer marked as found in versions haskell-alsa-mixer/0.3.0-2. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of b

Bug#1004740: exim4: SIGSEGV (maybe attempt to write to immutable memory) when sending a mail; message frozen

2022-02-01 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2022-02-01 14:44:21 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > 2022-02-01 14:23:23 1nEt2b-0008jG-97 SIGSEGV (maybe attempt to write to > immutable memory) > 2022-02-01 14:23:23 1nEt2b-0008jG-97 Delivery status for xxx@yyy: got 0 of 7 > bytes (pipeheader) from transport process 35015 for transport smtp >

Processed: block 965518 with 1004024

2022-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 965518 with 1004024 Bug #965518 [src:fig2sxd] fig2sxd: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm 965518 was not blocked by any bugs. 965518 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 965518: 1004024 > thanks Stopping

Bug#1004740: exim4: SIGSEGV (maybe attempt to write to immutable memory) when sending a mail; message frozen

2022-02-01 Thread Vincent Lefevre
Package: exim4 Version: 4.95-3 Severity: serious When sending a mail: [...] 2022-02-01 14:23:22 1nEt2b-0008jG-97 H=mx2.mailchannels.net [34.214.163.59]: SMTP error from remote mail server after DATA: 450 [S09] Try Again Later 2022-02-01 14:23:22 1nEt2b-0008jG-97 H=mx2.mailchannels.net [34.214.16

Bug#1004736: marked as done (libgupnp-dlna-2.0-4: missing Breaks+Replaces: libgupnp-dlna-2.0-3 (<< 0.12))

2022-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 01 Feb 2022 13:18:50 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1004736: fixed in gupnp-dlna 0.12.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1004736, regarding libgupnp-dlna-2.0-4: missing Breaks+Replaces: libgupnp-dlna-2.0-3 (<< 0.12) to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#1004735: marked as done (libgupnp-av-1.0-3: missing Breaks+Replaces: libgupnp-av-1.0-2 (<< 0.14))

2022-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 01 Feb 2022 13:18:44 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1004735: fixed in gupnp-av 0.14.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1004735, regarding libgupnp-av-1.0-3: missing Breaks+Replaces: libgupnp-av-1.0-2 (<< 0.14) to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Processed: Bug#1004736 marked as pending in gupnp-dlna

2022-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1004736 [libgupnp-dlna-2.0-4] libgupnp-dlna-2.0-4: missing Breaks+Replaces: libgupnp-dlna-2.0-3 (<< 0.12) Added tag(s) pending. -- 1004736: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1004736 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.

Bug#1004736: marked as pending in gupnp-dlna

2022-02-01 Thread Jeremy Bicha
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1004736 in gupnp-dlna reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/gupnp-dlna/-/commit/f10a1fc4e8405e7af6bb55a

Bug#1004735: marked as pending in gupnp-av

2022-02-01 Thread Jeremy Bicha
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1004735 in gupnp-av reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/gupnp-av/-/commit/6a682c7c6a306ea519edac4716c

Processed: Bug#1004735 marked as pending in gupnp-av

2022-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1004735 [libgupnp-av-1.0-3] libgupnp-av-1.0-3: missing Breaks+Replaces: libgupnp-av-1.0-2 (<< 0.14) Added tag(s) pending. -- 1004735: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1004735 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian

Processed: Re: Bug#1004540: node-graphql build failure with current babel (passed with an older babel)

2022-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 important Bug #1004540 [node-babel7] node-graphql build failure with current babel (passed with an older babel) Severity set to 'important' from 'grave' -- 1004540: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1004540 Debian Bug Tracking System Co

Bug#1004540: node-graphql build failure with current babel (passed with an older babel)

2022-02-01 Thread Yadd
Control: severity -1 important On 01/02/2022 13:56, Yadd wrote: On 01/02/2022 13:12, Pirate Praveen wrote: Control: severity -1 grave On ഞാ, ജനു 30 2022 at 02:48:39 വൈകു +0530 +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: Error: Cannot find module './resources/add-extension-to-import-paths' This is caus

Bug#1004540: marked as pending in node-babel

2022-02-01 Thread Yadd
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1004540 in node-babel reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-babel/-/commit/de2e3ed00f1f113a1b9dea4114

Processed: Bug#1004540 marked as pending in node-babel

2022-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1004540 [node-babel7] node-graphql build failure with current babel (passed with an older babel) Added tag(s) pending. -- 1004540: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1004540 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.or

Bug#1004540: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#1004540: Bug#1004540: node-graphql build failure with current babel (passed with an older babel)

2022-02-01 Thread Yadd
On 01/02/2022 13:12, Pirate Praveen wrote: Control: severity -1 grave On ഞാ, ജനു 30 2022 at 02:48:39 വൈകു +0530 +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: Error: Cannot find module './resources/add-extension-to-import-paths' This is caused by this patch to load modules from system, https://salsa.debian

Bug#1004736: libgupnp-dlna-2.0-4: missing Breaks+Replaces: libgupnp-dlna-2.0-3 (<< 0.12)

2022-02-01 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: libgupnp-dlna-2.0-4 Version: 0.12.0-1 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from 'sid' to 'experimental'. It installed fine in 'sid', then the upgrade to 'experimental' fails because i

Bug#1004735: libgupnp-av-1.0-3: missing Breaks+Replaces: libgupnp-av-1.0-2 (<< 0.14)

2022-02-01 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: libgupnp-av-1.0-3 Version: 0.14.0-1 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from 'sid' to 'experimental'. It installed fine in 'sid', then the upgrade to 'experimental' fails because it

Processed: Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#1004540: node-graphql build failure with current babel (passed with an older babel)

2022-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 grave Bug #1004540 [node-babel7] node-graphql build failure with current babel (passed with an older babel) Severity set to 'grave' from 'normal' -- 1004540: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1004540 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact o

Bug#1004703: marked as done (ruby-pygments.rb: autopkgtest regression: No such file or directory)

2022-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 01 Feb 2022 12:06:44 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1004703: fixed in ruby-pygments.rb 2.3.0+ds-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1004703, regarding ruby-pygments.rb: autopkgtest regression: No such file or directory to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#1004614: marked as done (odpic: fails to clean after successful build: rm: cannot remove './debian/doctrees': Is a directory)

2022-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 01 Feb 2022 11:19:20 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1004614: fixed in odpic 4.3.0-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1004614, regarding odpic: fails to clean after successful build: rm: cannot remove './debian/doctrees': Is a directory to be marked as done. T

Bug#1004693: vfs_fruit module is in the binary package samba-vfs-modules

2022-02-01 Thread Jonathan Dowland
From what I can determine, the affected module is distributed in the samba-vfs-modules package, so any worried users trying to figure out whether they are vulnerable or not, check whether this package is installed: if not, you likely aren't. -- Please do not CC me for listmail. 👱🏻 Jonathan

Processed: Re: Bug#1004671: incompatible with current biblatex version

2022-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > forwarded -1 https://github.com/plk/biblatex/issues/1202 Bug #1004671 [biber] incompatible with current biblatex version Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://github.com/plk/biblatex/issues/1202'. -- 1004671: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=100

Bug#1004671: incompatible with current biblatex version

2022-02-01 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/plk/biblatex/issues/1202 Am 31.01.2022 um 15:53 teilte Ryan Kavanagh mit: Hi, I'm not sure if this should instead be filed against texlive-bibtex-extra, but the current version of biber is incompatible with the biblatex package currently in Debian unsta

Processed: severity of 1000958 is normal

2022-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 1000958 normal Bug #1000958 [exim4-daemon-light] /etc/aliases dosn't work since bullseye Severity set to 'normal' from 'critical' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1000958: https://bugs.debi

Bug#1000958: /etc/aliases dosn't work since bullseye

2022-02-01 Thread Marc Haber
tags #1000958 thanks On Thu, Dec 02, 2021 at 09:21:23AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote: > It will probably be easier to send that un-obfuscated, you can do that > in private if you prefer that. For the protocol: We had a short e-mail exchange, I had to ask for additional debug input and then the conver

Processed (with 1 error): Re: Bug#949519: sudo-ldap: Fails to connect to LDAP : "ldap_sasl_bind_s(): Can't contact LDAP server"

2022-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > packsge sudo-ldap Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > severity #949519 normal Bug #949519 [sudo-ldap] sudo-ldap: Fails to connect to LDAP : "ldap_sasl_bind_s(): Can't contact LDAP server" Severity set to 'normal' from 'grave' > o

Bug#949519: sudo-ldap: Fails to connect to LDAP : "ldap_sasl_bind_s(): Can't contact LDAP server"

2022-02-01 Thread Marc Haber
packsge sudo-ldap severity #949519 normal outlook #949519 close after 2022-02-28 thanks Lowering severity as this seems to affect just a few users. Greetings Marc

Bug#994178: libnginx-mod-http-lua - init_worker_by_lua_block segfaults

2022-02-01 Thread Anton Tolchanov
> The nginx source bundles the http-lua module in a version incompatible > with nginx 1.18. It segfaults immediately with a minimal config if a > "init_worker_by_lua_block" block is defined. (I haven't looked much > further.) I have submitted a merge request to upgrade lua-nginx-module version t