Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1002787 [src:babel-minify] babel-minify: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error:
/bin/sh -ex debian/tests/pkg-js/test returned exit code 1
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1002787: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1002787
Debian Bug Tracking Syste
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1002787 in babel-minify reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/babel-minify/-/commit/c75d8e6abe024ed4230a77
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 1002811 openssh
Bug #1002811 [src:openssh] update-alternative: and can't be the
same
Bug reassigned from package 'src:openssh' to 'openssh'.
No longer marked as found in versions openssh/1:8.7p1-3.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 1002811 1002803
Bug #1002811 [src:openssh] update-alternative: and can't be the
same
Unable to merge bugs because:
package of #1002803 is 'openssh' not 'src:openssh'
Failed to forcibly merge 1002811: Did not alter merged bugs.
> tha
Source: openssh
Version: 1:8.7p1-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
upgrade fails with version 1:8.7p1-3:
Setting up openssh-client (1:8.7p1-3) ...
update-alternatives: and can't be the same
Use 'update-alternatives --help' for program usage information.
dpkg
-tokens
Version: 6.0.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211228 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering direct
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 999185 patch
Bug #999185 [src:atmel-firmware] atmel-firmware: missing required debian/rules
targets build-arch and/or build-indep
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
999185: h
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1002752 in node-js-tokens reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-js-tokens/-/commit/a8a061ea0277836f0b
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1002752 [src:node-js-tokens] node-js-tokens: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error:
/bin/sh -ex debian/tests/pkg-js/test returned exit code 1
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1002752: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1002752
Debian Bug Tracking S
On Tue, 09 Nov 2021 22:28:19 +0100 Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: atmel-firmware
> Version: 1.3-4.1
> Severity: important
> Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9
> Tags: bookworm sid
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep
>
> Dear maintainer,
>
> Your package
Your message dated Wed, 29 Dec 2021 05:48:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1002205: fixed in rust-gtk 0.14.3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1002205,
regarding rust-gtk: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
The parts of the rust gtk stack used by resvg are now installable again after
having been broken for some time,
so I decided to take a look and see if I could get
The first thing I did was change the dependency on pico-args to 0.4 so that I
could attempt a build.
I then discovered that the dep
Your message dated Wed, 29 Dec 2021 05:03:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1002147: fixed in rust-pangocairo 0.14.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1002147,
regarding rust-pangocairo: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Package: openssh
Version: 1:8.7p1-3
Severity: serious
Tag: patch
Hi,
I think there's a typo here (running openssh-client postinst with set -x):
--snip--
+ update-alternatives --install /usr/bin/rcp rcp /usr/bin/scp 20 --slave
/usr/share/man/man1/rcp.1.gz rcp.1.gz /usr/share/man/man1/rcp.1.gz
act ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: rust-pbr
Version: 1.0.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211228 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Re
Message ---
Source: rust-sniffglue
Version: 0.14.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211228 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
---
Source: rust-zip
Version: 0.5.13-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211228 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Message ---
Source: rust-html2pango
Version: 0.4.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211228 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Message ---
Source: rust-dhcp4r
Version: 0.2.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211228 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Message ---
Source: rust-condure
Version: 1.1.0-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211228 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Message ---
Source: rust-xml5ever
Version: 0.16.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211228 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Message ---
Source: rust-ammonia
Version: 3.1.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211228 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
--- Begin Message ---
Source: rust-markup5ever-rcdom
Version: 0.1.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211228 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part
Your message dated Wed, 29 Dec 2021 01:57:44 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#996712: libcache-memcached-fast-perl: autopkgtest
failure on armhf: Fetched all keys / Match results
has caused the Debian Bug report #996712,
regarding libcache-memcached-fast-perl: autopkgtest failure on
Version: 0.27-4
On Mon, 27 Dec 2021 17:24:40 +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
> - With this patch the testsuite passes for me locally both during
> build and autopkgtests, so I went ahead and uploaded -4 with this
> change.
> - I'll monitor the build logs and autopkgtest logs to see how the
>
Your message dated Wed, 29 Dec 2021 00:34:39 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1002128: fixed in rust-gdk 0.14.3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1002128,
regarding rust-gdk: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
Your message dated Wed, 29 Dec 2021 00:18:42 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#995799: fixed in nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-340xx
340.108-12
has caused the Debian Bug report #995799,
regarding nvidia-legacy-340xx-driver startx failure on 5.14.9
to be marked as done.
This means that y
* Lucas Nussbaum:
>> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
>> libguestfs-tools : Depends: guestfs-tools but it is not installable
>> E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
>> apt-get failed.
Sure, we'll just need to wait for the guestfs-tools package (#1002577)
t
Your message dated Tue, 28 Dec 2021 23:33:27 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1002133: fixed in rust-gtk-sys 0.14.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1002133,
regarding rust-gtk-sys: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
Your message dated Wed, 29 Dec 2021 01:22:56 +0200
with message-id <20211228232256.GA6914@localhost>
and subject line Re: Bug#1000773: ruby-gitlab-sidekiq-fetcher: autopkgtest
needs update for new version of ruby-sidekiq: Could not find 'sidekiq' (>= 5, <
6.1)
has caused the Debian Bug report #10
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 976686 + pending
Bug #976686 [src:glom] glom: mixing incompatible libpython and libboost_python
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
976686: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bu
hello
I have see the same test error here:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/geary/-/issues/776
Michael Gratton @mjog · 1 year ago
Maintainer
Hi, thanks for the report. A couple of the unit tests do some checking
of collation orde
Your message dated Tue, 28 Dec 2021 22:48:46 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1002191: fixed in rust-gdk-sys 0.14.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1002191,
regarding rust-gdk-sys: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies:
librust-cairo-sys-rs-0.9+default-dev, librust-gdk-pixbuf-sys-
Your message dated Tue, 28 Dec 2021 22:34:14 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1002126: fixed in rust-pango 0.14.8-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1002126,
regarding rust-pango: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem h
On 12/28/21 8:32 PM, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> Source: ceph
> Version: 16.2.6+ds-8
> Severity: critical
>
> Hi,
>
> from https://docs.ceph.com/en/latest/releases/pacific/
>
>
> V16.2.6 PACIFIC
> Danger
>
> DATE: 01 NOV 2021.
>
> DO NOT UPGRADE TO CEPH PACIFIC FROM AN OLDER VERSION.
>
> A recent
Your message dated Tue, 28 Dec 2021 22:04:03 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1002137: fixed in rust-gdk-pixbuf 0.14.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1002137,
regarding rust-gdk-pixbuf: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Tue, 28 Dec 2021 22:03:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1002504: fixed in libphp-swiftmailer 6.3.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1002504,
regarding php-swiftmailer: Failing testsuite with PHP 8.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 994276 997628
Bug #994276 {Done: Timo Aaltonen } [xutils-dev]
xutils-dev: imake shouldn't pass l to ar
Bug #997615 {Done: Timo Aaltonen } [xutils-dev] troffcvt:
FTBFS: ar: libdeps specified more than once
Bug #997636 {Done: Timo Aalto
close 997628 1:7.7+6
thanks
This was also reported as #994276, and fixed in version 1:7.7+6
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 997628 1:7.7+6
Bug #997628 [xutils-dev] imake: uses “ar clq” by default, which recent binutils
broke in an incompatible way
Bug #997638 [xutils-dev] nas: FTBFS: ar: libdeps specified more than once
Marked as fixed in versions xutils-dev/1:7
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 confirmed
Bug #1002088 [src:vorta] vorta: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test -i
python{version} -p "3.10 3.9" returned exit code 13
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1002088 to the same tags previously set
--
1002088: https://bugs.debian.org/cg
Control: tag -1 confirmed
Hi Lucas,
Reply follows inline.
Lucas Nussbaum writes:
> Source: vorta
> Version: 0.7.8-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS
> Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
> User: lu...@debian.org
> Usertags: ftbfs-20211220 ftbfs-bookworm
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packag
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 confirmed
Bug #1002088 [src:vorta] vorta: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test -i
python{version} -p "3.10 3.9" returned exit code 13
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
1002088: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1002088
Debian Bug Tracking Sys
ox-esr
Version: 91.4.0esr-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211228 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[5]: Entering directory &
Your message dated Tue, 28 Dec 2021 21:36:30 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1002154: fixed in rust-gio 0.14.8-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1002154,
regarding rust-gio: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1002504 + pending
Bug #1002504 [php-swiftmailer] php-swiftmailer: Failing testsuite with PHP 8.1
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1002504: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 1002781 with 1002700
Bug #1002781 [src:org-roam] org-roam: FTBFS: Cannot open load file: No such
file or directory, ox-extra
1002781 was not blocked by any bugs.
1002781 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 1002781: 1002700
>
Hello,
Thank you for the report. I will have a look at whether or not I can reproduce
this,
and will fix accordingly.
Kind regards,
Shayan
--
Shayan Doust - 201427418
Fingerprint: 0401 A810 A6F2 4303 1EA3 9759 6D7D 4419 19D0 2395
Note: all emails sent by me are signed with my PGP key.
sign
Your message dated Tue, 28 Dec 2021 20:48:36 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1002157: fixed in rust-atk 0.14.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1002157,
regarding rust-atk: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
Source: python-pycdlib
Version: 1.12.0+ds1-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211228 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: statsmodels
Version: 0.13.1+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211228 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Your message dated Tue, 28 Dec 2021 20:37:44 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1002588: fixed in wurlitzer 3.0.2-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1002588,
regarding wurlitzer: autopkgtest regression on ppc64el: AssertionError: assert
65536 == 32768
to be marked as done.
This means th
Your message dated Tue, 28 Dec 2021 20:37:18 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1002159: fixed in rust-cairo-rs 0.14.9-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1002159,
regarding rust-cairo-rs: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pro
Source: babel-minify
Version: 0.5.1+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211228 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: ros-perception-pcl
Version: 1.7.3-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211228 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/
Source: pd-mediasettings
Version: 0.1.1-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211228 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cc -DPD
Source: firefox-esr
Version: 91.4.0esr-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211228 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: golang-github-biogo-graph
Version: 0.0~git20150317.057c198-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211228 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part
Source: libconfig-model-backend-augeas-perl
Version: 0.125-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211228 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part
Source: org-roam
Version: 2.1.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211228 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules bin
Source: rust-sniffglue
Version: 0.14.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211228 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: python-aioamqp
Version: 0.14.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211228 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: cdbs
Version: 0.4.163
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211228 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: magic-wormhole
Version: 0.12.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211228 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/ru
Source: python-django-channels
Version: 3.0.4-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211228 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: python-daphne
Version: 3.0.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211228 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: lua-cliargs
Version: 3.0-2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211228 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/ru
Source: nbdkit
Version: 1.28.3-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211228 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: nfs-ganesha
Version: 3.4-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211228 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cd /<>
Source: rust-zip
Version: 0.5.13-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211228 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: lua-say
Version: 1.3-1-6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211228 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules bin
Source: lua-system
Version: 0.2.1-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211228 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/ru
Source: rust-html2pango
Version: 0.4.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211228 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: magic-wormhole-mailbox-server
Version: 0.4.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211228 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: rust-dhcp4r
Version: 0.2.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211228 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: hfd-service
Version: 0.1.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211228 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/ru
Source: emscripten
Version: 3.0.1~dfsg+~1.39.6-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211228 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: lua-mediator
Version: 1.1.2-0-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211228 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/ru
Source: rust-pbr
Version: 1.0.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211228 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: rust-condure
Version: 1.1.0-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211228 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: rust-xml5ever
Version: 0.16.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211228 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: rust-ammonia
Version: 3.1.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211228 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: zeek
Version: 3.2.3+ds2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211228 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cd /<>/
Source: node-immutable
Version: 4.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211228 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: newsboat
Version: 2.21-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211228 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: python-pcl
Version: 0.3.0~rc1+dfsg-11
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211228 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> x86
Source: node-js-tokens
Version: 6.0.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211228 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: rust-markup5ever-rcdom
Version: 0.1.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211228 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Your message dated Tue, 28 Dec 2021 19:54:35 +
with message-id <6843c279-7ece-2e89-9f22-f84cff29d...@p10link.net>
and subject line fixed by upload of 0.14.8-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1002184,
regarding rust-glib: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies:
librust-glib-sys-0.9+default-d
Your message dated Tue, 28 Dec 2021 19:50:14 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#994276: fixed in xutils-dev 1:7.7+6
has caused the Debian Bug report #994276,
regarding knews: FTBFS: ar: libdeps specified more than once
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
Your message dated Tue, 28 Dec 2021 19:50:14 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#994276: fixed in xutils-dev 1:7.7+6
has caused the Debian Bug report #994276,
regarding xtel: FTBFS: ar: libdeps specified more than once
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has be
Your message dated Tue, 28 Dec 2021 19:50:14 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#994276: fixed in xutils-dev 1:7.7+6
has caused the Debian Bug report #994276,
regarding koules: FTBFS: ar: libdeps specified more than once
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Tue, 28 Dec 2021 19:50:14 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#994276: fixed in xutils-dev 1:7.7+6
has caused the Debian Bug report #994276,
regarding troffcvt: FTBFS: ar: libdeps specified more than once
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
Your message dated Tue, 28 Dec 2021 19:50:14 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#994276: fixed in xutils-dev 1:7.7+6
has caused the Debian Bug report #994276,
regarding xutils-dev: imake shouldn't pass l to ar
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Tue, 28 Dec 2021 19:48:27 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#965430: fixed in baycomusb 0.10-15
has caused the Debian Bug report #965430,
regarding baycomusb: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that t
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #965430 [src:baycomusb] baycomusb: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5
and 6 in bookworm
Added tag(s) pending.
--
965430: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=965430
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with p
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #965430 in baycomusb reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/debian-hamradio-team/baycomusb/-/commit/095a2c213e535bcb
Source: ceph
Version: 16.2.6+ds-8
Severity: critical
Hi,
from https://docs.ceph.com/en/latest/releases/pacific/
V16.2.6 PACIFIC
Danger
DATE: 01 NOV 2021.
DO NOT UPGRADE TO CEPH PACIFIC FROM AN OLDER VERSION.
A recently-discovered bug (https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/53062) can cause
data co
Hello Camm!
On 12/28/21 19:20, Camm Maguire wrote:
> Correction, that is current autobuilders on 68k and sh4.
That's a known issue, see [1]. I will patch the glibc packages for m68k
and sh4 again to address this issue.
Adrian
> [1] https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23960
--
.''
Processing control commands:
> tags 997271 + patch
Bug #997271 [src:xnnpack] xnnpack: FTBFS: intrinsics-polyfill.h:27:6: error:
conflicting types for ‘_mm_storeu_si32’; have ‘void(const void *, __m128i)’
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 997271 + pending
Bug #997271 [src:xnnpack] xnnpack: FTBFS: intrins
1 - 100 of 153 matches
Mail list logo
