Processed: buster-pu, bullseye-pu

2021-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1000341 -moreinfo Bug #1000341 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package mariadb-10.3 10.3.32-0+deb10u1 Removed tag(s) moreinfo. > tags 1000340 -moreinfo Bug #1000340 [src:bibtexconv] bibtexconv: autopkgtest failure: "Tests" field is empty Ig

Bug#996378: marked as done (ruby-rspec-retry: FTBFS with ruby3.0: ERROR: Test "ruby3.0" failed: Failure/Error:)

2021-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 27 Nov 2021 05:03:41 + with message-id and subject line Bug#996378: fixed in ruby-rspec-retry 0.6.2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #996378, regarding ruby-rspec-retry: FTBFS with ruby3.0: ERROR: Test "ruby3.0" failed: Failure/Error: to be marked as done. This

Bug#996378: marked as pending in ruby-rspec-retry

2021-11-26 Thread Daniel Leidert
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #996378 in ruby-rspec-retry reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-rspec-retry/-/commit/91eba55133161

Processed: Bug#996378 marked as pending in ruby-rspec-retry

2021-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #996378 [src:ruby-rspec-retry] ruby-rspec-retry: FTBFS with ruby3.0: ERROR: Test "ruby3.0" failed: Failure/Error: Added tag(s) pending. -- 996378: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=996378 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact o

Bug#996527: marked as done (sup-mail: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby2.7" failed: NameError: uninitialized constant ActiveSupport)

2021-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 27 Nov 2021 03:34:36 + with message-id and subject line Bug#996527: fixed in sup-mail 1.0-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #996527, regarding sup-mail: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby2.7" failed: NameError: uninitialized constant ActiveSupport to be marked as done. This me

Bug#1000360: marked as done (segyio: FTBFS with Python 3.10)

2021-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 27 Nov 2021 03:34:30 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1000360: fixed in segyio 1.8.3-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1000360, regarding segyio: FTBFS with Python 3.10 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If t

Bug#996379: marked as done (ruby-rspec: FTBFS with ruby3.0: ERROR: Test "ruby3.0" failed: Failure/Error: DEFAULT_FAILURE_NOTIFIER = lambda { |failure, _opts| raise failure })

2021-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 27 Nov 2021 04:29:12 +0100 with message-id <5bff162e3757627ba99b19e9d595ecf8e6fe4583.ca...@debian.org> and subject line Fixed with the latest upload of ruby-rspec/3.10.0c1e1m2s3-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #996379, regarding ruby-rspec: FTBFS with ruby3.0: ERROR: Test

Bug#996527: marked as pending in sup-mail

2021-11-26 Thread Daniel Leidert
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #996527 in sup-mail reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/sup-mail/-/commit/9a12bf6ed2976e5dacf68f1adc7d7

Processed: Bug#996527 marked as pending in sup-mail

2021-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #996527 [src:sup-mail] sup-mail: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby2.7" failed: NameError: uninitialized constant ActiveSupport Added tag(s) pending. -- 996527: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=996527 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow

Bug#1000680: python3-aiohttp: fails to import, "TypeError: function() argument 'code' must be code, not str"

2021-11-26 Thread Sandro Tosi
Package: python3-aiohttp Version: 3.7.4-2+b1 Severity: grave X-Debbugs-Cc: mo...@debian.org Control: affects -1 uvloop Hello, simply importing aiohttp results in an error: root@zion:/# python3.9 -c "import aiohttp" Traceback (most recent call last): File "", line 1, in File "/usr/lib/python3

Processed: python3-aiohttp: fails to import, "TypeError: function() argument 'code' must be code, not str"

2021-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > affects -1 uvloop Bug #1000680 [python3-aiohttp] python3-aiohttp: fails to import, "TypeError: function() argument 'code' must be code, not str" Added indication that 1000680 affects uvloop -- 1000680: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1000680 Debi

Bug#1000679: marked as done (ruby-rr: NameError: uninitialized constant ActiveSupport)

2021-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 27 Nov 2021 03:04:39 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1000679: fixed in ruby-rr 3.0.8-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1000679, regarding ruby-rr: NameError: uninitialized constant ActiveSupport to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Processed: Bug#1000679 marked as pending in ruby-rr

2021-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1000679 [ruby-rr] ruby-rr: NameError: uninitialized constant ActiveSupport Added tag(s) pending. -- 1000679: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1000679 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1000679: marked as pending in ruby-rr

2021-11-26 Thread Daniel Leidert
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1000679 in ruby-rr reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-rr/-/commit/12e9e609ee3e27d8b87b6432b3e720

Processed: cloning 996527, reassign -1 to ruby-rr ..., tagging -1 ..., block 996527 with -1

2021-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > clone 996527 -1 Bug #996527 [src:sup-mail] sup-mail: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby2.7" failed: NameError: uninitialized constant ActiveSupport Bug 996527 cloned as bug 1000679 > reassign -1 ruby-rr 3.0.7-1 Bug #1000679 [src:sup-mail] sup-mail: FTBFS:

Bug#996308: marked as done (ruby-kitchen-salt: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby2.7" failed: /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/rubygems/specification.rb:1404:in `rescue in block in activate_dependencies': Could not fi

2021-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 27 Nov 2021 02:53:30 +0100 with message-id <4e48a243a735f622cd20ac3a783ee01b7b696799.ca...@debian.org> and subject line Both issues fixed with the upload of test-kitchen/1.23.2-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #996308, regarding ruby-kitchen-salt: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby2

Bug#996307: marked as done (ruby-kitchen-docker: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby2.7" failed: /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/rubygems/specification.rb:1404:in `rescue in block in activate_dependencies': Could not

2021-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 27 Nov 2021 02:53:30 +0100 with message-id <4e48a243a735f622cd20ac3a783ee01b7b696799.ca...@debian.org> and subject line Both issues fixed with the upload of test-kitchen/1.23.2-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #996307, regarding ruby-kitchen-docker: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "rub

Bug#996528: marked as done (test-kitchen: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby2.7" failed: Could not find 'thor' (~> 0.19) among 87 total gem(s) (Gem::MissingSpecError))

2021-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 27 Nov 2021 01:48:45 + with message-id and subject line Bug#996528: fixed in test-kitchen 1.23.2-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #996528, regarding test-kitchen: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby2.7" failed: Could not find 'thor' (~> 0.19) among 87 total gem(s) (Gem::Missing

Bug#967018: marked as done (test-kitchen: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby2.7" failed: cannot load such file -- aruba/in_process (LoadError))

2021-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 27 Nov 2021 01:48:45 + with message-id and subject line Bug#967018: fixed in test-kitchen 1.23.2-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #967018, regarding test-kitchen: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby2.7" failed: cannot load such file -- aruba/in_process (LoadError) to be marked

Bug#996528: marked as pending in test-kitchen

2021-11-26 Thread Daniel Leidert
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #996528 in test-kitchen reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/test-kitchen/-/commit/b078c418725c243a02c0e

Processed: Bug#996528 marked as pending in test-kitchen

2021-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #996528 [src:test-kitchen] test-kitchen: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby2.7" failed: Could not find 'thor' (~> 0.19) among 87 total gem(s) (Gem::MissingSpecError) Added tag(s) pending. -- 996528: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=99652

Processed: Bug#967018 marked as pending in test-kitchen

2021-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #967018 [src:test-kitchen] test-kitchen: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby2.7" failed: cannot load such file -- aruba/in_process (LoadError) Added tag(s) pending. -- 967018: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=967018 Debian Bug Tracking Sys

Bug#967018: marked as pending in test-kitchen

2021-11-26 Thread Daniel Leidert
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #967018 in test-kitchen reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/test-kitchen/-/commit/f95bcf341f8bb4e0edc48

Bug#994366: marked as done (python-pyxattr: Removal of the python3-*-dbg packages in sid/bookworm)

2021-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 27 Nov 2021 00:49:44 + with message-id and subject line Bug#994366: fixed in python-pyxattr 0.7.2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #994366, regarding python-pyxattr: Removal of the python3-*-dbg packages in sid/bookworm to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Processed: severity of 994359 is important

2021-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 994359 important Bug #994359 [src:python-llfuse] python-llfuse: Removal of the python3-*-dbg packages in sid/bookworm Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance

Processed: block 996308 with 996528

2021-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 996308 with 996528 Bug #996308 [src:ruby-kitchen-salt] ruby-kitchen-salt: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby2.7" failed: /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/rubygems/specification.rb:1404:in `rescue in block in activate_dependencies': Could not find 'thor' (~

Bug#1000673: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#1000673: reportbug: npm package depends on too many packages, including X11

2021-11-26 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Control: severity -1 important Hi Mikel, Quoting Mikel Pérez (2021-11-26 23:57:36) > Severity: serious > Justification: Policy 2.2.1 Justification cannot be § 2.2.1 which is about what can go into Debian or instead can only be part of the "contrib" or "non-free": the npm package comply with al

Processed: block 996307 with 996528

2021-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 996307 with 996528 Bug #996307 [src:ruby-kitchen-docker] ruby-kitchen-docker: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby2.7" failed: /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/rubygems/specification.rb:1404:in `rescue in block in activate_dependencies': Could not find 'thor

Processed: Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#1000673: reportbug: npm package depends on too many packages, including X11

2021-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 important Bug #1000673 [npm] reportbug: npm package depends on too many packages, including X11 Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' -- 1000673: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1000673 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bu

Processed: tagging 996116

2021-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # > https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/forks/r10k/-/commit/8b869037d4fa83de1d5ab67b34ce6ac70718fd30 > tags 996116 + pending Bug #996116 [src:r10k] r10k: FTBFS with ruby3.0: ERROR: Test "ruby3.0" failed: ArgumentError: Added tag(s) pending.

Bug#1000467: marked as done (rpm, autopkgtest failure on armhf)

2021-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Nov 2021 23:35:43 + with message-id and subject line Bug#968487: fixed in rpm 4.17.0+dfsg1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #968487, regarding rpm, autopkgtest failure on armhf to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. I

Bug#996137: marked as done (ruby-binding-of-caller: FTBFS with ruby3.0: ERROR: Test "ruby3.0" failed: :85:in `require': cannot l

2021-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Nov 2021 23:35:51 + with message-id and subject line Bug#996137: fixed in ruby-binding-of-caller 1.0.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #996137, regarding ruby-binding-of-caller: FTBFS with ruby3.0: ERROR: Test "ruby3.0" failed: :85:in `require': cannot load suc

Bug#968487: marked as done (rpm returns wrong %{_target})

2021-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Nov 2021 23:35:43 + with message-id and subject line Bug#968487: fixed in rpm 4.17.0+dfsg1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #968487, regarding rpm returns wrong %{_target} to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If thi

Bug#1000388: marked as done (FTBFS on s390x due to whitespace damage)

2021-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Nov 2021 23:18:45 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1000388: fixed in parlatype 3.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1000388, regarding FTBFS on s390x due to whitespace damage to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi

Processed: Bug#996137 marked as pending in ruby-binding-of-caller

2021-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #996137 [src:ruby-binding-of-caller] ruby-binding-of-caller: FTBFS with ruby3.0: ERROR: Test "ruby3.0" failed: :85:in `require': cannot load such file -- binding_of_caller.so (LoadError) Added tag(s) pending. -- 996137: https://bugs.debian.org

Bug#996137: marked as pending in ruby-binding-of-caller

2021-11-26 Thread Daniel Leidert
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #996137 in ruby-binding-of-caller reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-binding-of-caller/-/commit/5

Bug#1000673: reportbug: npm package depends on too many packages, including X11

2021-11-26 Thread Mikel Pérez
Package: npm Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 X-Debbugs-Cc: i...@mikelpr.com Dear Maintainer, I was installing npm on my headless raspberry pi when I noticed it pulls unnecessary libx11 packages and xserver-utils. Since they're not listed on the package dependencies, I assume one of

Bug#1000197: marked as done (assimp: binary-any FTBFS)

2021-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Nov 2021 22:19:16 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1000197: fixed in assimp 5.1.1~ds0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1000197, regarding assimp: binary-any FTBFS to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this

Bug#1000617: marked as done (python3-nbclient_0.5.6-1: trying to overwrite '/usr/bin/jupyter-run', which is also in package jupyter-client 7.0.6-2)

2021-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Nov 2021 21:19:36 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1000617: fixed in nbclient 0.5.6-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1000617, regarding python3-nbclient_0.5.6-1: trying to overwrite '/usr/bin/jupyter-run', which is also in package jupyter-client 7.0.6-2 to

Bug#1000230: marked as done (screenruler fails to start)

2021-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Nov 2021 19:08:02 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1000230: fixed in screenruler 0.960+bzr41+deb10-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #1000230, regarding screenruler fails to start to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#1000215:

2021-11-26 Thread Andreas Hasenack
I filed this upstream bug https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/2979 and am using this patch in Ubuntu: diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules index 0e28ea8e..7bfab4c1 100755 --- a/debian/rules +++ b/debian/rules @@ -4,6 +4,12 @@ include /usr/share/dpkg/pkg-info.mk export DEB_BUILD_MAINT

Bug#973153: caml-crush: FTBFS: ocamlopt: OCaml has been configured with -force-safe-string: -unsafe-string is not available.

2021-11-26 Thread Thomas Calderon
I believe this is resolved in 1.0.12-1 published in unstable but I forgot to add the *Closes* reference to the Changelog. On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 10:51 AM Simon Chopin wrote: > Source: caml-crush > Followup-For: Bug #973153 > > There's a PR upstream to deal with this: > > https://github.com/caml

Bug#984299: marked as done (psocksxx: ftbfs with GCC-11)

2021-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Nov 2021 17:33:54 + with message-id and subject line Bug#984299: fixed in psocksxx 1.1.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #984299, regarding psocksxx: ftbfs with GCC-11 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this i

Bug#996363: marked as done (ruby-rbpdf: FTBFS with ruby3.0: ERROR: Test "ruby3.0" failed: Error: test: Image get image file test(RbpdfHttpTest): NoMethodError: undefined method `shutdown' for nil:NilC

2021-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Nov 2021 16:49:55 + with message-id and subject line Bug#996363: fixed in ruby-rbpdf 1.20.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #996363, regarding ruby-rbpdf: FTBFS with ruby3.0: ERROR: Test "ruby3.0" failed: Error: test: Image get image file test(RbpdfHttpTest): NoM

Processed: Bug#996363 marked as pending in ruby-rbpdf

2021-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #996363 [src:ruby-rbpdf] ruby-rbpdf: FTBFS with ruby3.0: ERROR: Test "ruby3.0" failed: Error: test: Image get image file test(RbpdfHttpTest): NoMethodError: undefined method `shutdown' for nil:NilClass Added tag(s) pending. -- 996363: https://b

Bug#996363: marked as pending in ruby-rbpdf

2021-11-26 Thread Daniel Leidert
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #996363 in ruby-rbpdf reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-rbpdf/-/commit/637ee7bff7b2ec4aff2e5d76f

Bug#996298: marked as done (ruby-influxdb: FTBFS with ruby3.0: ERROR: Test "ruby3.0" failed: Failure/Error: specify { expect(conf.proxy_port).to eq(8080) })

2021-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Nov 2021 16:21:39 + with message-id and subject line Bug#996298: fixed in ruby-influxdb 0.8.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #996298, regarding ruby-influxdb: FTBFS with ruby3.0: ERROR: Test "ruby3.0" failed: Failure/Error: specify { expect(conf.proxy_port

Bug#999626: No need to conflict with xemacs21 here

2021-11-26 Thread Agustin Martin
On Thu, 25 Nov 2021 16:48:50 + Debian FTP Masters wrote: > We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of > maxima, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. ... > maxima (5.45.1-6) unstable; urgency=medium > . >* maxima-emacs conflicts with xemacs21

Bug#1000661: Missing b-dep on libbase64-ocaml-dev

2021-11-26 Thread Julien Puydt
Package: haxe Version: 1:4.1.5-1 Severity: grave I was checking whether a recent dune would break any package, and my test failed because Base64 was an unbound module -- it's a missing build-dep on libbase64-ocaml-dev, so it should be pretty straightforward to fix. Cheers, J.Puydt

Bug#1000558: Compatibility with Symfony 5

2021-11-26 Thread David Prévot
Le Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 07:03:39PM -0400, David Prévot a écrit : > Package: php-cboden-ratchet […] > Since symfony 5 has finally been uploaded to unstable, packages now > can’t depend on php-symfony-* (<< 5) anymore. Upgrading to a new > upstream version should do the trick (Symfony 5 has been rele

Bug#1000307: marked as done (FTBFS: autopkgtest fails sue to missing socket.io module)

2021-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Nov 2021 15:07:15 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1000307: fixed in node-http-proxy 1.18.1-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #1000307, regarding FTBFS: autopkgtest fails sue to missing socket.io module to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#1000465: marked as done (libodbc1: Missing dependency and dangling symlink)

2021-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Nov 2021 14:44:09 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1000465: fixed in unixodbc 2.3.9-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1000465, regarding libodbc1: Missing dependency and dangling symlink to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has be

Processed: closing 996403

2021-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > close 996403 Bug #996403 [src:ruby-rails-controller-testing] ruby-rails-controller-testing: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby3.0" failed. Marked Bug as done > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 996403: https://

Processed: merge RPM armhf bugs

2021-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > package rpm Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'rpm' Limit currently set to 'package':'rpm' > severity 968487 serious Bug #968487 [rpm] rpm returns wrong %{_target} Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > merge

Bug#999907: libglobalarrays-dev,libga-dev: both ship /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libga.a

2021-11-26 Thread Boyuan Yang
X-Debbugs-CC: mba...@debian.org debichem-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi, My personal preference would be implementing mutual conflict. Michael: Please let me know whether this works for you. I can make an NMU to implement mutual conflic for src:ga if you find it necessary. -- Thanks, Boyuan

Processed: ruby-jaeger-client FTBFS on IPV6-only buildds

2021-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > block 998006 by -1 Bug #998006 {Done: Paul Gevers } [src:ruby-jaeger-client] src:ruby-jaeger-client: fails to migrate to testing for too long: unresolved RC bug 998006 was blocked by: 996300 998006 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 998006: 1000649

Bug#1000649: ruby-jaeger-client FTBFS on IPV6-only buildds

2021-11-26 Thread Adrian Bunk
Source: ruby-jaeger-client Version: 1.2.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Control: block 998006 by -1 https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=ruby-jaeger-client&arch=all ... Failures: 1) Jaeger::Encoders::ThriftEncoder without custom tags has ip Failure/Error: expect(ip_tag.vStr).to

Processed: block 998006 with 996300

2021-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 998006 with 996300 Bug #998006 {Done: Paul Gevers } [src:ruby-jaeger-client] src:ruby-jaeger-client: fails to migrate to testing for too long: unresolved RC bug 998006 was not blocked by any bugs. 998006 was not blocking any bugs. Added bl

Processed: Re: Bug#981680 closed by Debian FTP Masters (reply to Mathias Gibbens ) (Bug#981680: fixed in golang-github-canonical-go-dqlite 1.10.

2021-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reopen -1 Bug #981680 {Done: Mathias Gibbens } [src:golang-github-canonical-go-dqlite] golang-github-canonical-go-dqlite FTBFS: test failures 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may ne

Bug#981680: closed by Debian FTP Masters (reply to Mathias Gibbens ) (Bug#981680: fixed in golang-github-canonical-go-dqlite 1.10.1-1)

2021-11-26 Thread Adrian Bunk
Control: reopen -1 On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 12:21:09PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: >... > golang-github-canonical-go-dqlite (1.10.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium >... >* Add patches to fix tests (Closes: #981680) >... Unfortunately this does not seem to be sufficient: https://build

Bug#994365: marked as done (python-pylibacl: Removal of the python3-*-dbg packages in sid/bookworm)

2021-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Nov 2021 12:34:04 + with message-id and subject line Bug#994365: fixed in python-pylibacl 0.6.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #994365, regarding python-pylibacl: Removal of the python3-*-dbg packages in sid/bookworm to be marked as done. This means that you cla

Bug#981680: marked as done (golang-github-canonical-go-dqlite FTBFS: test failures)

2021-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Nov 2021 12:18:43 + with message-id and subject line Bug#981680: fixed in golang-github-canonical-go-dqlite 1.10.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #981680, regarding golang-github-canonical-go-dqlite FTBFS: test failures to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#996806: [Pkg-mailman-hackers] Bug#996806: mailmain3: Expected test results for arc_validate tests need updating

2021-11-26 Thread Pierre-Elliott Bécue
Le 26 novembre 2021 12:42:23 GMT+01:00, Jordi Mallach a écrit : >Hi Pierre-Elliott! > >El dj. 25 de 11 de 2021 a les 22:19 +0100, en/na Pierre-Elliott Bécue >va escriure: >> > I might try to work on a fix in the following days, most probably >> > including an update to the latest version, which i

Bug#996806: [Pkg-mailman-hackers] Bug#996806: mailmain3: Expected test results for arc_validate tests need updating

2021-11-26 Thread Jordi Mallach
Hi Pierre-Elliott! El dj. 25 de 11 de 2021 a les 22:19 +0100, en/na Pierre-Elliott Bécue va escriure: > > I might try to work on a fix in the following days, most probably > > including an update to the latest version, which includes other > > fixes I > > need. > > I'm waiting for some stuck depe

Bug#855837: marked as done (golang-petname: should this be in bullseye)

2021-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Nov 2021 11:18:54 + with message-id and subject line Bug#855837: fixed in golang-petname 2.11~git20191129.8e5a1ed-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #855837, regarding golang-petname: should this be in bullseye to be marked as done. This means that you claim that th

Bug#995625: httping FTBFS: error: format not a string literal and no format arguments [-Werror=format-security]

2021-11-26 Thread folkert
It's on https://github.com/folkertvanheusden/HTTPing > Would it be possible to either have the URL of the upstream VCS or a > proper patch file for 4ea9d5b78540c972e3fe1bf44db9f7b3f87c0ad0? > I couldn't find any mention of a VCS on the homepage, only tarballs.

Bug#995625: httping FTBFS: error: format not a string literal and no format arguments [-Werror=format-security]

2021-11-26 Thread Simon Chopin
Hi, Would it be possible to either have the URL of the upstream VCS or a proper patch file for 4ea9d5b78540c972e3fe1bf44db9f7b3f87c0ad0? I couldn't find any mention of a VCS on the homepage, only tarballs. Thanks in advance, Cheers -- Simon Chopin Foundations Team

Processed: tagging 1000635

2021-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1000635 + ftbfs Bug #1000635 [node-monocle] node-monocle is incompatible with current node-readdirp Added tag(s) ftbfs. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1000635: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bi

Bug#1000637: php-facedetect FTBFS: Package not converted to dh-php >= 4

2021-11-26 Thread Adrian Bunk
Source: php-facedetect Version: 1.1.0-19-g135c72a-2 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs bookworm sid https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=php-facedetect&ver=1.1.0-19-g135c72a-2%2Bb1 ... dh_clean /usr/share/dh-php/gen-control Package not converted to dh-php >= 4 make[1]: *** [/usr/share/dh-php/

Bug#999764: marked as done (gcc-12: file conflicts with gcc-11 due to missing Breaks+Replaces or renaming)

2021-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Nov 2021 09:33:41 + with message-id and subject line Bug#999764: fixed in gcc-12 12-20211126-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #999764, regarding gcc-12: file conflicts with gcc-11 due to missing Breaks+Replaces or renaming to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#1000636: caffe FTBFS: test failures

2021-11-26 Thread Adrian Bunk
Source: caffe Version: 1.0.0+git20180821.99bd997-8 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs bookworm sid https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=caffe&ver=1.0.0%2Bgit20180821.99bd997-8%2Bb3 ... == ERROR: test_coord_map (unittest.loade

Bug#1000635: node-monocle is incompatible with current node-readdirp

2021-11-26 Thread Yadd
Package: node-monocle Version: 1.1.51+dfsg-1.1 Severity: grave Tags: upstream Justification: renders package unusable Enabling test proves that this package is broken. Since it is used only by deprecated node-jade, I'll ask a ROM-RM instead of searching a solution (not trivial).

Bug#1000625: marked as done (libopencv-dev: Broken pkg-config file)

2021-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Nov 2021 09:18:44 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1000625: fixed in opencv 4.5.4+dfsg-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #1000625, regarding libopencv-dev: Broken pkg-config file to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#998585: marked as done (pillow: FTBFS: /<>/docs/deprecations.rst:105: WARNING: Unknown directive type "versionremoved".)

2021-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Nov 2021 09:55:19 +0100 with message-id <4a18f085-34b6-1d54-5b0c-bcfc3b5b5...@debian.org> and subject line Re: pillow: FTBFS has caused the Debian Bug report #998585, regarding pillow: FTBFS: /<>/docs/deprecations.rst:105: WARNING: Unknown directive type "versionremoved"

Bug#1000576: closing 1000576

2021-11-26 Thread Timo Aaltonen
On 25.11.2021 17.38, Salvo Tomaselli wrote: What about the evdev one? What about it? -libinput replaced it and has more features. -- t

Bug#984159: gnubiff: ftbfs with GCC-11

2021-11-26 Thread Simon Chopin
Package: gnubiff Version: 2.2.17-3 Followup-For: Bug #984159 User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu jammy ubuntu-patch X-Debbugs-Cc: simon.cho...@canonical.com Control: tags -1 patch Dear Maintainer, In Ubuntu, the attached patch was applied to achieve the following: * d/

Processed: Re: gnubiff: ftbfs with GCC-11

2021-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 patch Bug #984159 [src:gnubiff] gnubiff: ftbfs with GCC-11 Added tag(s) patch. -- 984159: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=984159 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems