Hi Paul,
Paul Gevers, on 2021-08-10:
> I copied some of the output at the bottom of this report. It's ironical
> that cd-hit complains about not enough memory when the worker this test
> runs on has the biggest amount of memory we have in the ci.d.n worker
> park: 250GB. If I read the output corre
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #992052 [src:cd-hit] cd-hit: autopkgtest fails on very powerful CI workers
Added tag(s) pending.
--
992052: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=992052
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #992052 in cd-hit reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/cd-hit/-/commit/c5dc37a4f668b207b09790e5d26b3e0ee8
Control: tag -1 + patch
On Tue, 29 Jun 2021 01:44:06 +0530 Pirate Praveen
wrote:
> It uses webpack to build.
>
> https://github.com/nicolargo/glances/blob/develop/glances/outputs/static/package.json#L28
>
> cd glances/outputs/static && webpack
>
> in debian/rules with required build dependen
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 + patch
Bug #990340 [glances] glances: contains prebuilt javascript without source
Added tag(s) patch.
--
990340: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=990340
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> affects 928226 =
Bug #928226 {Done: Andreas Beckmann }
[firefox-esr-dev,iceweasel-l10n-ak,iceweasel-l10n-csb,iceweasel-l10n-ku,iceweasel-l10n-lg,iceweasel-l10n-nso,iceweasel-l10n-ta-lk,iceweasel-l10n-zu,iceweasel-l10n-be,firefox-esr-l10n-en-za,ic
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> clone 928226 -1
Bug #928226 {Done: Andreas Beckmann }
[firefox-esr-dev,thunderbird-dev,lightning-l10n-bn-bd,lightning-l10n-pa-in,lightning-l10n-ta-lk,thunderbird-l10n-bn-bd,thunderbird-l10n-pa-in,thunderbird-l10n-ta-lk,linux-headers-4.9.0-8-amd64
Hi,
On Sun, 25 Jul 2021 16:52:27 +0100 Steve McIntyre wrote:
> When we found that problem, as an immediate workaround I released a
> newer shim-signed package into the buster-updates repo which solves
> it: version 1.36~1+deb10u2+15.4-5~deb10u1 (note the
> deb10u1->deb10u2). I can see that your s
Your message dated Tue, 10 Aug 2021 17:33:30 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#992045: fixed in cpio 2.13+dfsg-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #992045,
regarding CVE-2021-38185
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
Your message dated Tue, 10 Aug 2021 16:33:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#992065: fixed in mpich 3.4.1-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #992065,
regarding mpich: libhdf5-mpich-dev upgrade problems if libmpich1.0-dev is still
installed
to be marked as done.
This means that you cla
Package: libhdf5-mpich-dev
Version: 1.10.6+repack-4
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
During an piuparts upgrade test of libhdf5-mpich-dev on the upgrade path
squeeze -> wheezy -> jessie -> stretch -> buster -> bullseye
I observed this failure:
Package: mpich
Version: 3.4.1-4
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Control: affects -1 + libhdf5-mpich-dev
During an piuparts upgrade test of libhdf5-mpich-dev on the upgrade path
squeeze -> wheezy -> jessie -> stretch -> buster -> bullseye
I observed this fail
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + libhdf5-mpich-dev
Bug #992065 [mpich] mpich: libhdf5-mpich-dev upgrade problems if
libmpich1.0-dev is still installed
Added indication that 992065 affects libhdf5-mpich-dev
--
992065: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=992065
Debian Bug
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 992040 + bullseye sid
Bug #992040 {Done: Pirate Praveen } [ruby-rqrcode-rails3]
gitlab 2FA broken: NoMethodError (undefined method `module_count' for
#
Added tag(s) sid and bullseye.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
Le mardi 10 août 2021, 08:05:00 UTC Benno Schulenberg a écrit :
> Op 09-08-2021 om 15:08 schreef Bastien Roucariès:
> > nano work with TERM=dumb (but is strange but it work),
>
> For me, 'TERM=dumb nano somefile' does not work, not on a console, not
> on an xterm, not on Xfce Terminal -- it shows
2021, ഓഗസ്റ്റ് 10 5:44:35 PM IST, Pirate Praveen ൽ
എഴുതി
>
>
>2021, ഓഗസ്റ്റ് 10 12:44:39 PM IST, "László Böszörményi (GCS)"
>ൽ എഴുതി
>>Control: tags -1 +pending
>>
>>Hi Pirate,
>>
>>On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 8:51 PM Pirate Praveen
>>wrote:
>>> Can you upload this change? Or if you are okay with
Hello,
Thank you for handling this issue so quickly. I'm travelling for the next
week and won't be able to work on anything Debian related.
If you feel comfortable, you could also upload the fixed package without
any delay.
Thanks,
Gregor
Your message dated Tue, 10 Aug 2021 11:03:27 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#992053: fixed in c-ares 1.17.1-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #992053,
regarding c-ares: CVE-2021-3672: Missing input validation on hostnames returned
by DNS servers
to be marked as done.
This means tha
Package: opensysusers
Version: 0.6-2
Severity: serious
Tags: security upstream
X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian Security Team
opensysusers uses the shell's `eval` on everything in sysusers.d like
there is no tomorrow. These files can contain shell meta-characters
that should not result in code execution, e.g
Your message dated Tue, 10 Aug 2021 08:17:19 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#992008: fixed in protobuf 3.17.3-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #992008,
regarding ruby-google-protobuf: Missing lib/google/protobuf directory and fails
require
to be marked as done.
This means that you c
Op 09-08-2021 om 15:08 schreef Bastien Roucariès:
> nano work with TERM=dumb (but is strange but it work),
For me, 'TERM=dumb nano somefile' does not work, not on a console, not
on an xterm, not on Xfce Terminal -- it shows something, but is totally
unusable: the user cannot see what he or she is
Hi Gregor,
On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 09:38:07AM +0200, Gregor Jasny wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Thank you for handling this issue so quickly. I'm travelling for the next
> week and won't be able to work on anything Debian related.
>
> If you feel comfortable, you could also upload the fixed package withou
Control: tags -1 +pending
Hi Pirate,
On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 8:51 PM Pirate Praveen wrote:
> Can you upload this change? Or if you are okay with this change, I can
> upload it as well. Once this is fixed, I can switch back to the
> packaged version (currently using gem install google-protobuf as
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 +pending
Bug #992008 [ruby-google-protobuf] ruby-google-protobuf: Missing
lib/google/protobuf directory and fails require
Added tag(s) pending.
--
992008: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=992008
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bug
24 matches
Mail list logo
