Your message dated Wed, 28 Jul 2021 06:03:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#990312: fixed in linux 5.10.46-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #990312,
regarding linux-image-5.10.0-8-amd64: amdgpu does not let Graphics Card enter
low power state, HIGH idle powerconsumption
to be marke
Your message dated Wed, 28 Jul 2021 06:03:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#990312: fixed in linux 5.10.46-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #990312,
regarding Vega 56's GPUTach stuck at 100% as soon as the driver is loaded
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pro
Your message dated Wed, 28 Jul 2021 06:03:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#990312: fixed in linux 5.10.46-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #990312,
regarding linux-image-5.10.0-8-amd64: Radeon 6800 XT: 100% GPU core usage & 74
Watts when idle
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Wed, 28 Jul 2021 06:03:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#990312: fixed in linux 5.10.46-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #990312,
regarding linux-image-5.10.0-8-amd64: GPU usage stuck at 99%
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Hey Aurelien,
> For what I have remarked is that the 2560 PiB is allocated from around
> the beginning of the testsuite, but the crash happened way later. It
> might just be that there is original issue (allocating insane amount of
> memory) that is there for some time, but that using many part of
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 991476 redis: very large amount of memory used by the testsuite on
> s390x
Bug #991476 [redis] redis: insane amount of memory used by the testsuite on
s390x
Changed Bug title to 'redis: very large amount of memory used by the testsuite
Followup-For: Bug #991070
Rebuilding src:virtuoso-opensource/buster in sid generates proper
dependencies for libvirtuoso5.5-cil
==> it's not a toolchain issue
The buildlog has these warnings:
dh_clideps: warning: Warning: No Debian dependency data for System
(2.0.0.0__b77a5c561934e089)!
dh_clid
Your message dated Tue, 27 Jul 2021 23:33:47 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#990890: fixed in virtuoso-opensource 7.2.5.1+dfsg1-0.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #990890,
regarding virtuoso-opensource-7: source contains non-free image sw-vert-v.svg
to be marked as done.
This means t
Your message dated Tue, 27 Jul 2021 23:33:47 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#991070: fixed in virtuoso-opensource 7.2.5.1+dfsg1-0.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #991070,
regarding libvirtuoso5.5-cil lost all dependencies except cli-common in bullseye
to be marked as done.
This mean
Hi,
On 2021-07-25 12:02, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Hi Aurelien,
>
> > Version 5:6.2.4-1 built fine, so it's likely a regression introduced in
> > the new upstream version.
>
> Thanks for the report. I just have a few minutes to look into this
> right this second so (for my own convenience) I've attach
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # security issues that can be fixed later with a DSA
> tags 991323 + bullseye-ignore
Bug #991323 [src:dovecot] dovecot: CVE-2020-28200
Added tag(s) bullseye-ignore.
> tags 991541 + bullseye-ignore
Bug #991541 [src:php-pear] php-pear: CVE-2021-3261
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #991579 [xfce4-terminal] (no subject)
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> severity -1 normal
Bug #991579 [xfce4-terminal] (no subject)
Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious'
> reassign gnuit 4.9.5-3
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
--
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Control: severity -1 normal
Control: reassign gnuit 4.9.5-3
On 2021-07-27 21:45:50 +0200, gleam0 wrote:
>
> Subject: xfce: gitfm (gnuit) is not rally useable in that terminal nore in
> any other
... in any other. So a bug in gnuit? Let's reassign it there. And for a
se
Subject: xfce: gitfm (gnuit) is not rally useable in that terminal nore in any
other
Package: xfce4-terminal
Version: 0.8.3-1
File: xfce
Justification: 4
Severity: serious
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the s
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 991307 0.60.7~20110707-6
Bug #991307 {Done: Agustin Martin Domingo } [src:aspell]
aspell: CVE-2019-25051
Marked as found in versions aspell/0.60.7~20110707-6.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
Package: freeradius
Version: 3.0.21+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
freeradius-ldap fails to install if freeradius is not already running.
steps to reproduce:
sudo apt install freeradius
sudo service freeradius stop
sudo apt install freeradius-ldap
results in this:
[...]
The following NEW
Your message dated Tue, 27 Jul 2021 16:18:39 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#991433: fixed in six 1.16.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #991433,
regarding six: please add Breaks against unversioned python packages from buster
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #991433 in six reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/six/-/commit/6a6593b228881e614c3474ec1836
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #991433 [src:six] six: please add Breaks against unversioned python
packages from buster
Added tag(s) pending.
--
991433: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=991433
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with prob
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> unarchive 779288
Bug #779288 {Done: Martin-Éric Racine }
[upgrade-system] upgrade-system: cronjob still active after package was removed
(but not purged)
Unarchived Bug 779288
> found 779288 1.2.0.3
Bug #779288 {Done: Martin-Éric Racine }
[upgr
Your message dated Tue, 27 Jul 2021 12:19:11 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#990368: fixed in supertuxkart 1.2+ds2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #990368,
regarding Supertuxkart has proprietary data
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit
Package: libpmix-dev
Version: 4.1.0~rc1-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'sid' to 'experimental'.
It installed fine in 'sid', then the upgrade to 'experimental' fails
because it tri
Le lun. 26 juil. 2021 à 23:21, Sebastian Ramacher
a écrit :
>
> Dear maintainer,
>
> I've prepared an NMU for cifs-utils (versioned as 2:6.11-3.1). The diff
> is attached to this message.
>
Thanks!
--
Mathieu Parent
23 matches
Mail list logo
