Bug#990436: librust-cargo-dev: please use a versioned dependency for librust-flate2-1+{default,zlib}-dev

Package: librust-cargo-dev Version: 0.43.1-3 Severity: serious Tags: patch librust-cargo-dev depends on librust-flate2-1+default-dev and librust-flate2-1+zlib-dev which are (versioned) virtual packages provided by librust-flate2+zlib-dev in buster and by librust-flate2+rust-backend-dev and librust

Processed: tagging 951647

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 951647 - pending Bug #951647 [libmstch-dev] libmstch-dev: Library configuration is misplaced Removed tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 951647: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bug

Bug#987936: libstorj: fails to build from the source

On Sat, May 15, 2021 at 05:05:26AM +0100, Philip Wyett wrote: >... > --- libstorj-1.0.3/debian/libstorj0.symbols 2018-12-30 17:48:58.0 > + > +++ libstorj-1.0.3/debian/libstorj0.symbols 2021-05-15 04:38:45.0 > +0100 > @@ -28,7 +28,6 @@ > mnemonic_generate_indexes@Base 1.0

Bug#988717: marked as done (lxml: triggers lintian autoreject tag 'license-problem-md5sum-non-free-file')

Your message dated Mon, 28 Jun 2021 20:33:30 + with message-id and subject line Bug#988717: fixed in lxml 4.6.3+dfsg-0.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #988717, regarding lxml: triggers lintian autoreject tag 'license-problem-md5sum-non-free-file' to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#990340: glances: contains prebuilt javascript without source

On Sat, 26 Jun 2021 07:51:18 +0200 Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote: > Package: glances > Version: 3.1.5-1 > Severity: serious > Justification: Policy 2.2.1 > > Hi, > > the source package contains: > > glances/outputs/static/public/glances.js > glances/outputs/static/public/glances.map.j

Processed: tagging 981997

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 981997 + bookworm sid Bug #981997 [gudev-sharp-1.0] Conflicting monodoc-gudev-manual binary built also by Package: gudev-sharp-3.0 Added tag(s) sid and bookworm. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -

Processed: tagging 990419

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 990419 + upstream Bug #990419 [puppetdb] CVE-2021-27021 Added tag(s) upstream. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 990419: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=990419 Debian Bug Track

Bug#990419: CVE-2021-27021

Package: puppetdb Version: 6.2.0-5 Severity: grave Tags: security X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian Security Team See https://puppet.com/security/cve/cve-2021-27021/ Fixed by https://github.com/puppetlabs/puppetdb/commit/c146e624d230f7410fb648d58ae28c0e3cd457a2 https://github.com/puppetlabs/puppetdb/commit/

Bug#990417: openjdk-11-jre-headless: running java in qemu s390 gives a SIGILL at C [linux-vdso64.so.1+0x6f8] __kernel_getcpu+0x8

Package: openjdk-11-jre-headless Version: 11.0.11+9-1~deb10u1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Dear Maintainer, I tried tu run java in an qemu emulated s390 debian VM. The bug accects also unstabel and te openjdk versions 15, 16 and 17, but not version 1.8 The outcome is

Bug#986709: dirvish is unmaintained since 2005, but still available in bullseye

Hi, given that dirvish is still available in bullseye, although it's unmaintained for more than 16(!) years now, it really makes me wonder why rsnapshot has been removed. Please add it back, it's removal doesn't make any sense. Bye...     Dirk -- Dirk Heinrichs GPG Public Key: D01B367761B0F7C

Bug#990263: podman sets oom_score_adj to -1000 for processes inside the

container so the system breaks in OOM situations Message-Id: <20210629000848.a3125fe89a9984a780074...@iijmio-mail.jp> In-Reply-To: <502056d5848360369973f2c96882ff37ad42bb4f.ca...@doo.shop> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; char

Bug#990412: pam: PAM doesn't appear to be reading /lib/security

> "Rowan" == Rowan Wookey writes: Rowan> Fair enough, I couldn't find any docs on the policy of Rowan> /lib/security or any news on it not being scanned in Rowan> Bullseye, is there something about that somewhere? I don't know. I had mostly been not paying attention to PAM but it

Bug#990412: pam: PAM doesn't appear to be reading /lib/security

Fair enough, I couldn't find any docs on the policy of /lib/security or any news on it not being scanned in Bullseye, is there something about that somewhere? On 28/06/2021 14:48, Sam Hartman wrote: > control: reassign -1 libpam-yubico > control: severity -1 grave > control: retitle -1 pam_yubico

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > fixed 989603 2.8.1+dfsg1-1 Bug #989603 {Done: Hideki Yamane } [ocsinventory-server] ocsinventory-server: Does not start after install Marked as fixed in versions ocsinventory-server/2.8.1+dfsg1-1. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contac

Processed: Re: Bug#990412: pam: PAM doesn't appear to be reading /lib/security

Processing control commands: > reassign -1 libpam-yubico Bug #990412 [libpam-yubico] pam_yubico fails to install module in multiarch path Ignoring request to reassign bug #990412 to the same package > severity -1 grave Bug #990412 [libpam-yubico] pam_yubico fails to install module in multiarch pat

Bug#990412: pam: PAM doesn't appear to be reading /lib/security

control: reassign -1 libpam-yubico control: severity -1 grave control: retitle -1 pam_yubico fails to install module in multiarch path control: found -1 2.23-1 > "Rowan" == Rowan Wookey writes: Rowan> It appears that in Bullseye pam isn't checking /lib/security.

Processed: Re: Bug#990412: pam: PAM doesn't appear to be reading /lib/security

Processing control commands: > reassign -1 libpam-yubico Bug #990412 [src:pam] pam: PAM doesn't appear to be reading /lib/security Bug reassigned from package 'src:pam' to 'libpam-yubico'. No longer marked as found in versions pam/1.4.0-7. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #990412 to

Bug#982794: firefox-esr: illegal instruction in libxul.so on armhf

Hi, On Sun, 14 Feb 2021 14:12:17 + Vincent Arkesteijn wrote: > Firefox is killed with SIGILL shortly after startup: > $ firefox-esr -safe-mode > Illegal instruction Can you reproduce it on freshly installed bullseye sytem? > -- System Information: > Debian Release: bullseye/sid > APT pr

Bug#934713: os-prober: missing dependency on mount

control: tags -1 +patch On Thu, 15 Aug 2019 16:49:46 +0200 Johannes Schauer wrote: > > > https://lists.debian.org/20170726081846.ga22...@fatal.se > > > > Well, debian-devel@ isn't where one files bug reports against packages that > > suddenly need a dependency? > > I was not trying to justify o

Processed: Re: Bug#934713: os-prober: missing dependency on mount

Processing control commands: > tags -1 +patch Bug #934713 [os-prober] os-prober: missing dependency on mount Added tag(s) patch. -- 934713: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=934713 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#883194: marked as done (please convert mountstats and nfsiostat scripts to Python3)

Your message dated Mon, 28 Jun 2021 12:48:22 + with message-id and subject line Bug#883194: fixed in nfs-utils 1:1.3.4-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #883194, regarding please convert mountstats and nfsiostat scripts to Python3 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the prob

Bug#990409: ca-cacert: should this package be removed?

Package: ca-cacert Version: 2019.0411-2 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: proposed-removal Hi, CAcert is pretty much made obsolete by LetsEncrypt, and unlike LetsEncrypt, it has never been part of the Mozilla truststore. Furthermore, the ca-cacert package has become vi

Bug#988358: marked as done (bucardo: please use versioned Depends: libpod-parser-perl (>= 1.63))

Your message dated Mon, 28 Jun 2021 11:33:26 + with message-id and subject line Bug#988358: fixed in bucardo 5.6.0-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #988358, regarding bucardo: please use versioned Depends: libpod-parser-perl (>= 1.63) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Processed: Bug#988358 marked as pending in bucardo

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #988358 [bucardo] bucardo: please use versioned Depends: libpod-parser-perl (>= 1.63) Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #988358 to the same tags previously set -- 988358: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=988358 Debian Bug Tr

Processed: Bug#988358 marked as pending in bucardo

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #988358 [bucardo] bucardo: please use versioned Depends: libpod-parser-perl (>= 1.63) Added tag(s) pending. -- 988358: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=988358 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problem

Bug#988358: marked as pending in bucardo

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #988358 in bucardo reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/postgresql/bucardo/-/commit/50a1a28940ec521f5b2c5d26485bee

Bug#988358: marked as pending in bucardo

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #988358 in bucardo reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/postgresql/bucardo/-/commit/8a7159e2870231d238d20188cfb920

Bug#985932: openstack-trove should not be included in Bullseye

Hi, Totally agree with your opinion. Cheers Michal Arbet Openstack Engineer Ultimum Technologies a.s. Na Poříčí 1047/26, 11000 Praha 1 Czech Republic +420 604 228 897 michal.ar...@ultimum.io *https://ultimum.io * LinkedIn