Processing control commands:
> block -1 by 966653
Bug #989786 [ruby-spamcheck] ruby-spamcheck: cannot use ruby-grpc package
989786 was not blocked by any bugs.
989786 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 989786: 966653
--
989786: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=9
Package: ruby-spamcheck
Version: 0.1.0+git20210519.2084b44-2
Severity: grave
Control: block -1 by 966653
Since the only reverse dependency of ruby-spamcheck is gitlab and
gitlab does not work with debian's ruby-grpc package (see #966653),
dependency on ruby-grpc is removed. It will be added bac
Your message dated Sun, 13 Jun 2021 01:48:29 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#989767: fixed in libesmtp 1.1.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #989767,
regarding libesmtp: Not built on buildd: arch arm64 binaries: needs a source
only upload
to be marked as done.
This means that you c
Hello.
The linux-image-5.10.0-7 update fell in testing (bullseye) and it includes some
patches for amdgpu. I do many tasks with amdgpu (games, vaapi decoding, vaapi
encoding, gpu computations), I will report if any problem resurfaces.
Thanks !
Max.
Your message dated Sat, 12 Jun 2021 20:18:24 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#989700: fixed in bluez 5.55-3.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #989700,
regarding bluez: CVE-2021-3588
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Sat, 12 Jun 2021 20:18:24 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#989614: fixed in bluez 5.55-3.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #989614,
regarding bluez: CVE-2021-0129 CVE-2020-26558
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
I'm sorry for messing this up, this is my first official debian package. Your
patch looks good. Could you please also open a MR on salsa for it? Or commit it
right away if you have the permissions.
I'm currently on vacation but can do further cleanup if required and an update
to 1.12.12 starting
Source: auto-apt-proxy
Version: 13.2
Severity: serious
Tags: bullseye-ignore
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: regression
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
Dear Antonio,
Your package has an autopkgtest, great! However, since somewhere in May
or June it started to fail [1]. Looking
Your message dated Sat, 12 Jun 2021 18:32:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#989662: fixed in connman 1.36-2.1~deb10u2
has caused the Debian Bug report #989662,
regarding connman: CVE-2021-33833: dnsproxy: Check the length of buffers before
memcpy
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Sat, 12 Jun 2021 18:32:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#983684: fixed in mupdf 1.14.0+ds1-4+deb10u3
has caused the Debian Bug report #983684,
regarding mupdf: CVE-2021-3407
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If thi
* Jochen Sprickerhof [2021-06-12 17:50]:
I've prepared an NMU for ogre-1.12 (versioned as 1.12.10+dfsg2-1.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/3. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
I've chosen a short delay as this needs to pass the NEW queue, hope
that is fine. The release team
Processing control commands:
> tags 989344 + patch
Bug #989344 [libogre-1.12] libogre-1.12: package name does not match soname
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 989344 + pending
Bug #989344 [libogre-1.12] libogre-1.12: package name does not match soname
Added tag(s) pending.
--
989344: https://bugs.deb
Control: tags 989344 + patch
Control: tags 989344 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for ogre-1.12 (versioned as 1.12.10+dfsg2-1.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/3. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
I've chosen a short delay as this needs to pass the NEW queue,
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> Found 932172 17
Bug #932172 {Done: Sylvestre Ledru } [dh-cargo] dh-cargo:
please refresh json timestamps
Marked as found in versions dh-cargo/17.
> Thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
932172: https://bu
Found 932172 17
Thanks
While preparing a stable update for a rust package to fix a FTBFS I discovered
that this
bug also affects buster, meaning that attempts to update rust packages in
buster (e.g. to fix
FTBFS introduced by rustc updates) result in rejections.
The fix applies cleanly to the
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 989774 help
Bug #989774 [ruby-pg-query] ruby-pg-query: no longer works with
ruby-google-protobuf
Added tag(s) help.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
989774: https://bugs.debian.org/cg
Processing control commands:
> block -1 by 989344
Bug #989357 [release.debian.org] nmu: ros-rviz_1.14.4+dfsg-3
989357 was not blocked by any bugs.
989357 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 989357: 989344
--
989357: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=989357
Debian
Package: ruby-pg-query
Version: 2.0.3-1
Severity: grave
Control: affects -1 gitlab gitaly ruby-gitlab-labkit
gitlab-sidekiq service fails to start when ruby-google-protobuf package
is used, works with gem install -v 3.17.1 google-protobuf and removing
ruby-google-protobuf
Possibly the debian
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 gitlab gitaly ruby-gitlab-labkit
Bug #989774 [ruby-pg-query] ruby-pg-query: no longer works with
ruby-google-protobuf
Added indication that 989774 affects gitlab, gitaly, and ruby-gitlab-labkit
--
989774: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bu
Your message dated Sat, 12 Jun 2021 10:47:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#988603: fixed in libxml2 2.9.4+dfsg1-7+deb10u2
has caused the Debian Bug report #988603,
regarding libxml2: CVE-2021-3541: Exponential entity expansion attack bypasses
all existing protection mechanisms
to be
20 matches
Mail list logo
