Your message dated Sun, 23 May 2021 04:48:29 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#988217: fixed in u-boot 2021.01+dfsg-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #988217,
regarding bootefi causes boot failure with boot.scr
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been de
Vagrant Cascadian (2021-05-22):
> This could impact debian-installer as it build-depends on it for
> armhf/arm64, though I think the chance of regressions are minimal. Is
> there a release candidate planned in the immediate future?
Exact plans are still sketchy, but I expect one in the next week
Hi Paul (2021.05.22_15:22:35_-0400)
> Currently this regression is blocking the migration of pyyaml to testing
> [1]. Of course, pyyaml shouldn't just break your autopkgtest (or even
> worse, your package), but it seems to me that the change in pyyaml was
> intended and your package needs to update
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 988998 + patch
Bug #988998 [src:lava] lava: autopkgtest needs update for new version of pyyaml
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
988998: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugre
On 2021-05-16, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2021-05-07, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> On 2021-04-16, Bastian Germann wrote:
>>> On a Lamobo R1, I can verify 2021.01 versions not to boot with a
>>> default environment. However, 2020.10+dfsg-2 boots. Even though the
>>> original issue has the same out
For what it's worth, here's a patch for git-el to have the directory
created, after Agustin's suggestion.
diff -Naur git-2.30.2/debian/git-el.dirs git_2.30.2-1.1/debian/git-el.dirs
--- git-2.30.2/debian/git-el.dirs 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ git_2.30.2-1.1/debian/git-el.dirs 2
Hello!
On Sun, May 16, 2021 at 4:18 PM Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
>
>
>> > But as said, the bug #988089 can only be fixed by a change in galera-4
>> > debian/control. Changing the mariadb-10.5 debian/control to
>> > recommends:galera-4 is a separate change.
>> Ok but I have no idea how this should be
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #988089 in galera-4 reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/mariadb-team/galera-4/-/commit/9f425977a2c29f8d8571f04a35
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #988089 [galera-4] mariadb-server: MariaDB uninstalled on dist-upgrade
Debian 10 -> 11
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #988089 to the same tags previously set
--
988089: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=988089
Debian Bug T
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #988089 [galera-4] mariadb-server: MariaDB uninstalled on dist-upgrade
Debian 10 -> 11
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #988089 to the same tags previously set
--
988089: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=988089
Debian Bug T
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #988089 in galera-4 reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/mariadb-team/galera-4/-/commit/2fc32e6a1aee2c0dc624e93c65
Your message dated Sat, 22 May 2021 20:17:25 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#988643: fixed in vtk-dicom 0.8.12-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #988643,
regarding python3-vtk-dicom: broken symlink:
/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/libvtkDICOMPython39D.cpython-39-x86_64-linux-gnu.so
->
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #988089 [galera-4] mariadb-server: MariaDB uninstalled on dist-upgrade
Debian 10 -> 11
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #988089 to the same tags previously set
--
988089: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=988089
Debian Bug T
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #988089 in galera-4 reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/mariadb-team/galera-4/-/commit/05fad203bd9fdb2239a55f4d1d
On 22/05/2021 15.53, Étienne Mollier wrote:
I redid
the vtk-dicom/0.8.12-3 revision to simply remove the broken
symlink.
Sponsored.
The d/not-installed is probably not working as expected, IIRC it does
not support wildcards. But you are still at compat level 12, so
dh_missing will only warn.
Source: lava
Version: 2020.12-3
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org, pyy...@packages.debian.org
Tags: sid bullseye
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: needs-update
Control: affects -1 src:pyyaml
Dear maintainer(s),
With a recent upload of pyyaml the autopkgtest of la
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 src:pyyaml
Bug #988998 [src:lava] lava: autopkgtest needs update for new version of pyyaml
Added indication that 988998 affects src:pyyaml
--
988998: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=988998
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.d
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #988089 in galera-4 reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/mariadb-team/galera-4/-/commit/996c84387498e9a5ace52863b5
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #988089 [galera-4] mariadb-server: MariaDB uninstalled on dist-upgrade
Debian 10 -> 11
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #988089 to the same tags previously set
--
988089: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=988089
Debian Bug T
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #988089 [galera-4] mariadb-server: MariaDB uninstalled on dist-upgrade
Debian 10 -> 11
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #988089 to the same tags previously set
--
988089: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=988089
Debian Bug T
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #988089 in galera-4 reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/mariadb-team/galera-4/-/commit/dc908944f0684478f863fb2391
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #988089 [galera-4] mariadb-server: MariaDB uninstalled on dist-upgrade
Debian 10 -> 11
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #988089 to the same tags previously set
--
988089: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=988089
Debian Bug T
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #988089 in galera-4 reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/mariadb-team/galera-4/-/commit/042cdaa9b0ea5e66ca7c0ae691
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #988089 [galera-4] mariadb-server: MariaDB uninstalled on dist-upgrade
Debian 10 -> 11
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #988089 to the same tags previously set
--
988089: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=988089
Debian Bug T
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #988089 in galera-4 reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/mariadb-team/galera-4/-/commit/4b794f6573f3ebd4df345d2a5b
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #988089 in galera-4 reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/mariadb-team/galera-4/-/commit/360310c7959ef0b8765f9f6b85
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #988089 [galera-4] mariadb-server: MariaDB uninstalled on dist-upgrade
Debian 10 -> 11
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #988089 to the same tags previously set
--
988089: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=988089
Debian Bug T
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #988089 [galera-4] mariadb-server: MariaDB uninstalled on dist-upgrade
Debian 10 -> 11
Added tag(s) pending.
--
988089: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=988089
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with proble
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #988089 in galera-4 reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/mariadb-team/galera-4/-/commit/f1143fadffdbf6a5d0bcd6d4a1
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #95 in rlottie reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/rlottie/-/commit/2e80c28db4f1b0202b48c5afff1b394d4f
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #95 [src:rlottie] CVE-2021-31323 CVE-2021-31322 CVE-2021-31321
CVE-2021-31320 CVE-2021-31319 CVE-2021-31318 CVE-2021-31317 CVE-2021-31315
Added tag(s) pending.
--
95: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=95
Debian Bug Tr
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 988986 tinyxml2
Bug #988986 [cppcheck] cppcheck: Symbol `_ZTVN8tinyxml210XMLPrinterE' has
different size in shared object, consider re-linking
Bug reassigned from package 'cppcheck' to 'tinyxml2'.
No longer marked as found in versions cp
Hi all,
Sorry for the noise with my previous sponsor request. I redid
the vtk-dicom/0.8.12-3 revision to simply remove the broken
symlink. Changes are available at the same location[1], updated
debdiff is available in attachment. I redid the tests to make
sure no regressions were introduced, an
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #988643 in vtk-dicom reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/vtk-dicom/-/commit/98ef20abb6d0c5601ddc9e8314a2
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #988643 [python3-vtk-dicom] python3-vtk-dicom: broken symlink:
/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/libvtkDICOMPython39D.cpython-39-x86_64-linux-gnu.so
-> libvtkDICOMPython39D.so.0.8
Added tag(s) pending.
--
988643: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bu
Hi Andreas,
Andreas Beckmann, on 2021-05-22:
> On 22/05/2021 12.03, Étienne Mollier wrote:
> > consecutive to changes in multi-arch hints I had to bring per
> > lintian regression, I attempted to install concurrently the
> > package libvtk-dicom-dev both in native and foreign
> > architecture, and
Your message dated Sat, 22 May 2021 12:03:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#987963: fixed in pymol 2.4.0+dfsg-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #987963,
regarding pymol: flaky autopkgtest on arm64: hits autopkgtest timeout
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the prob
On 22/05/2021 12.03, Étienne Mollier wrote:
consecutive to changes in multi-arch hints I had to bring per
lintian regression, I attempted to install concurrently the
package libvtk-dicom-dev both in native and foreign
architecture, and it would now fail with the following:
I'd leave out the M-A
Greetings fellow maintainers,
I brought a few changes to vtk-dicom to address the remaining RC
bug #988643. Changes are available on Salsa for review[1]. You
will find a debdiff against the version in bullseye attached. I
did a few tests to make sure the issue is corrected, such as:
- running
Hi,
On Sun, May 02, 2021 at 09:17:26PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Run 'pymol -c
> /tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.q81vxtos/downtmp/build.HQz/src/examples/cookbook/scenes2movie.pml'...
> :1: DeprecationWarning: the imp module is deprecated in favour
> of importlib; see the module's documentation for alternat
Op vr 14 mei 2021 om 09:53 schreef Otto Kekäläinen :
> Investigating (0) galera-4:amd64 < none -> 26.4.7-3 @un uN Ib >
> Broken galera-4:amd64 Conflicts on galera-3:amd64 < 25.3.25-2 ->
> 25.3.31-2+b1 @ii umU Ib >
> Considering galera-3:amd64 0 as a solution to galera-4:amd64 0
> Holding Back g
Hi Michael,
On 22-05-2021 09:57, Michael Banck wrote:
>> Your package has an autopkgtest, great. However, because of the failure
>> "caused" by glbic,
>
> Can you elaborate what you mean by that, is that related to pymol? Or
> are you saying that due to glbic (glibc?) failures, you had to look a
Hi Paul,
On Sun, May 02, 2021 at 09:17:26PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Source: pymol
> Version: 2.4.0+dfsg-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: sid bullseye
> X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: flaky
>
> Dear maintainer(s),
>
> Your package has an a
43 matches
Mail list logo
