Hello,
In Ubuntu I uploaded this ugly workaround for armhf
diff -pruN 6.2.2006+really6.2.1905+dfsg-2/debian/changelog
6.2.2006+really6.2.1905+dfsg-2ubuntu1/debian/changelog
--- 6.2.2006+really6.2.1905+dfsg-2/debian/changelog 2020-12-21
20:21:12.0 +
+++ 6.2.2006+really6.2.1905+dfs
Your message dated Thu, 01 Apr 2021 06:03:24 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#986217: fixed in netty 1:4.1.48-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #986217,
regarding netty: CVE-2021-21409
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 patch
Bug #985066 [mono-gac] mono-gac: messes with the unpacking of another package
Added tag(s) patch.
--
985066: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=985066
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Followup-For: Bug #985066
Control: tag -1 patch
The attached patch fixes the piuparts issue for me.
Andreas
diff -Nru mono-6.8.0.105+dfsg/debian/changelog
mono-6.8.0.105+dfsg/debian/changelog
--- mono-6.8.0.105+dfsg/debian/changelog2020-04-08 15:11:12.0
+0200
+++ mono-6.8.0.105+
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> fixed 985865 18.3.0-2
Bug #985865 {Done: Thomas Goirand } [puppet-module-swift]
puppet-module-swift: fails to install: chmod: cannot access
'/etc/facter/facts.d/swift_blockdevs_names_to_uuid.sh': No such file or
directory
Marked as fixed in ver
Processing control commands:
> block 983853 with -1
Bug #983853 [openstack-dashboard] openstack-dashboard: fails to upgrade from
'buster': Couldn't find anything to import:
/horizon/lib/font_awesome/scss/font-awesome.scss
983853 was not blocked by any bugs.
983853 was not blocking any bugs.
Adde
Package: fonts-font-awesome
Version: 5.0.10+really4.7.0~dfsg-4
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Control: block 983853 with -1
Control: affects -1 + openstack-dashboard
Hi,
a test with piuparts revealed that your package misses some content
after an upgrade, fi
Processing control commands:
> reopen -1
Bug #983853 {Done: Thomas Goirand } [openstack-dashboard]
openstack-dashboard: fails to upgrade from 'buster': Couldn't find anything to
import: /horizon/lib/font_awesome/scss/font-awesome.scss
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with
Control: reopen -1
On 31/03/2021 15.50, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
On 10/03/2021 10.39, Thomas Goirand wrote:
https://salsa.debian.org/openstack-team/services/horizon/-/commit/c841eedc22bfd099cb1bafbe814f847dd050ff60
* Fix upgrade from Buster to Bullseye by manually copying the
font-awesome
Your message dated Wed, 31 Mar 2021 20:16:48 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#986180: fixed in glibc 2.31-11
has caused the Debian Bug report #986180,
regarding libc6: cannot upgrade to libc6_2.31-10: pre-installation script
subprocess returned error exit status 10
to be marked as done.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 986119 with 986216
Bug #986119 {Done: Sven Bartscher }
[src:dwarf-fortress] Source package includes shared libraries with GPL
violations
986119 was not blocked by any bugs.
986119 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 986119:
Source: netty
Version: 1:4.1.48-3
Severity: grave
Tags: security upstream
X-Debbugs-Cc: car...@debian.org, Debian Security Team
Hi,
The following vulnerability was published for netty.
Strictly speaking this might be disputable as RC severity, but I think
it should be reach bullseye and so make
Processing control commands:
> clone -1 -2
Bug #986214 [src:ircii] ircii: CVE-2021-29376
Bug 986214 cloned as bug 986215
> reassign -2 src:scrollz 2.2.3-1
Bug #986215 [src:ircii] ircii: CVE-2021-29376
Bug reassigned from package 'src:ircii' to 'src:scrollz'.
No longer marked as found in versions i
Source: ircii
Version: 20190117-1
Severity: grave
Tags: security upstream
X-Debbugs-Cc: car...@debian.org, Debian Security Team
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: reassign -2 src:scrollz 2.2.3-1
Control: retitle -2 scrollz: CVE-2021-29376
The following vulnerability was published for ircii.
CVE-2021-
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 src:guymager 0.8.12-1
Bug #986206 [qt5-qmake] qmake drops options passed from QMAKE_CXXFLAGS_RELEASE
and QMAKE_CXXFLAGS_DEBUG
Bug reassigned from package 'qt5-qmake' to 'src:guymager'.
No longer marked as found in versions qtbase-opensource-src/5.15.2+df
Control: reassign -1 src:guymager 0.8.12-1
Control: severity -1 important
Hi Matthias!
On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 05:30:17PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> seen when building guymager, adding to the rules file:
>
> export DEB_CXXFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND = --param ggc-min-expand=0 --param
> ggc-min-heapsiz
Your message dated Wed, 31 Mar 2021 15:48:44 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#986119: fixed in dwarf-fortress 0.47.04+dfsg1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #986119,
regarding Source package includes shared libraries with GPL violations
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Source: xdg-utils
Followup-For: Bug #981422
Hello
The attached commit suggests a third option.
If you call the scripts with an explicit interpreter,
they need no execution rights in the first place.
>From 5a48d85ad66d60e9be0085e98fdc6ab830cf2e9f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nicolas Boulenguez
D
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 11:00:00PM +0200, Yadd wrote:
> Le 30/03/2021 à 21:40, Salvatore Bonaccorso a écrit :
> > Source: underscore
> > Version: 1.9.1~dfsg-1
> > Severity: grave
> > Tags: security upstream
> > Justification: user security hole
> > X-Debbugs-Cc: car...@debian.org, Debian Security T
Package: qt5-qmake
Version: 5.15.2+dfsg-5
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bullseye
seen when building guymager, adding to the rules file:
export DEB_CXXFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND = --param ggc-min-expand=0 --param
ggc-min-heapsize=0
The generated Makefile isn't correctly generated. The "# Command" line sho
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 986119 Source package includes shared libraries with GPL violations
Bug #986119 {Done: Sven Bartscher } [src:dwarf-fortress]
Source package includes files shared libraries with GPL violations
Changed Bug title to 'Source package includes
El mié, 31 de mar. de 2021 a la(s) 09:08,
escribió:
>
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 08:30:24AM -0400, PICCORO McKAY Lenz wrote:
> > linux is so popular (wh ugh) today.. but only for enterprices.. i do
> > not see any help for normal users that wants more freedom .. sad and
> > oscure!
>
> Please go aw
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #986143 [python3-novaclient] python3-django breaks: python3-django-horizon
<< 3:18.3.3
Added tag(s) pending.
--
986143: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=986143
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with proble
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #986143 in python-novaclient reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/openstack-team/clients/python-novaclient/-/commi
On 10/03/2021 10.39, Thomas Goirand wrote:
https://salsa.debian.org/openstack-team/services/horizon/-/commit/c841eedc22bfd099cb1bafbe814f847dd050ff60
* Fix upgrade from Buster to Bullseye by manually copying the font-awesom
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 python3-novaclient 2:17.2.1-2
Bug #986143 [python3-django] python3-django breaks: python3-django-horizon <<
3:18.3.3
Bug reassigned from package 'python3-django' to 'python3-novaclient'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #986143 to the same
Control: reassign -1 python3-novaclient 2:17.2.1-2
Control: affects -1 + openstack-dashboard
On 31/03/2021 13.48, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Does this mean that I should add a Breaks: python3-django-horizon in
python3-novaclient?
A
Breaks: python3-django-horizon (<< 3:18.6.2)
(is that the correct
On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 08:30:24AM -0400, PICCORO McKAY Lenz wrote:
> linux is so popular (wh ugh) today.. but only for enterprices.. i do
> not see any help for normal users that wants more freedom .. sad and
> oscure!
Please go away troll.
Your language is inappropriate and you are clearly unin
I have reading the wiki page
https://wiki.debian.org/SupportedArchitectures and noted that debian
drop some time ago the "universal" in their tittle.. just by this kind
of SH*T (like systemd and removal of fam by gammon -> so linux only
here)
my point is that collaboration is D R O P P E D for oth
On 3/30/21 11:48 PM, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 30/03/2021 17.33, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> Ah, sh**... What do you suggest then? (even: what do you suggest I test
>> in a VM...)
>
> I just tried all packages involved in the failed upgrade one by one and
> activated the openstack-dashboard trigge
Your message dated Wed, 31 Mar 2021 10:49:27 +0200
with message-id <9fb18eb5-059c-7920-2dcc-54983567c...@debian.org>
and subject line Fixed
has caused the Debian Bug report #985865,
regarding puppet-module-swift: fails to install: chmod: cannot access
'/etc/facter/facts.d/swift_blockdevs_names_to_
Your message dated Wed, 31 Mar 2021 09:05:05 +0200
with message-id <2d0de303-d034-8be4-a1d2-8b4c2e956...@progress-linux.org>
and subject line FTBFS on several architectures
has caused the Debian Bug report #986054,
regarding FTBFS on several architectures
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Package: zaqar-common
Version: 12.0.0~rc1-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As
per definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for
a release, thus the severity.
>Fr
33 matches
Mail list logo
