Processed: Re: Bug#980192: ruby-2.7: autopkgtest regression in testing: Errno::ENAMETOOLONG: File name too long

Processing control commands: > reassign -1 ruby2.7 2.7.2-3 Bug #980192 [src:ruby-2.7] ruby-2.7: autopkgtest regression in testing: Errno::ENAMETOOLONG: File name too long Warning: Unknown package 'src:ruby-2.7' Bug reassigned from package 'src:ruby-2.7' to 'ruby2.7'. No longer marked as found in

Bug#980192: ruby-2.7: autopkgtest regression in testing: Errno::ENAMETOOLONG: File name too long

Control: reassign -1 ruby2.7 2.7.2-3 On Vi, 15 ian 21, 21:51:44, Paul Gevers wrote: > Source: ruby-2.7 > Version: 2.7.2-3 > X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org > Severity: serious > User: debian...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: regression > > Dear maintainer(s), > > With a recent (december 2

Bug#980211: libextractor: FTBFS against librpm9 (test failure)

Source: libextractor Version: 1:1.10-2 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Hi Maintainer During a recent rebuild against librpm9, libextractor FTBFS on several architectures where it built previously [1]. I've copied what I hope is the relevant part of the log below. Regards Graham [1] https://buil

Bug#980199: marked as done (erlang: CVE-2020-35733)

Your message dated Sat, 16 Jan 2021 06:48:33 + with message-id and subject line Bug#980199: fixed in erlang 1:23.2.2+dfsg-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #980199, regarding erlang: CVE-2020-35733 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this

Processed: Bug#976935 marked as pending in inkscape

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #976935 [src:inkscape] inkscape: FTBFS on ppc64el: make[3]: *** No rule to make target 'po/zh_TW.gmo', needed by 'share/templates/default_templates.timestamp'. Stop. Added tag(s) pending. -- 976935: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi

Bug#976935: marked as pending in inkscape

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #976935 in inkscape reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/multimedia-team/inkscape/-/commit/2e2b302c34c7be0dad92a1c

Bug#957577: nast: ftbfs with GCC-10

Package: nast Version: 0.2.0-7 Followup-For: Bug #957577 User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu hirsute ubuntu-patch Control: tags -1 patch Hi, In Ubuntu, the attached patch was applied to achieve the following: * d/p/gcc-10: Fix FTBFS with GCC 10. Thanks for considering

Processed: Re: nast: ftbfs with GCC-10

Processing control commands: > tags -1 patch Bug #957577 [src:nast] nast: ftbfs with GCC-10 Added tag(s) patch. -- 957577: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=957577 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#957585: ncurses-hexedit: ftbfs with GCC-10

Package: ncurses-hexedit Version: 0.9.7+orig-7 Followup-For: Bug #957585 User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu hirsute ubuntu-patch Control: tags -1 patch Hi, In Ubuntu, the attached patch was applied to achieve the following: * d/p/gcc_10.patch: Fix FTBFS with GCC 10. T

Processed: Re: ncurses-hexedit: ftbfs with GCC-10

Processing control commands: > tags -1 patch Bug #957585 [src:ncurses-hexedit] ncurses-hexedit: ftbfs with GCC-10 Added tag(s) patch. -- 957585: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=957585 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Re: netdiag: ftbfs with GCC-10

Processing control commands: > tags -1 patch Bug #957596 [src:netdiag] netdiag: ftbfs with GCC-10 Added tag(s) patch. -- 957596: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=957596 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#957596: netdiag: ftbfs with GCC-10

Package: netdiag Version: 1.2-1 Followup-For: Bug #957596 User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu hirsute ubuntu-patch Control: tags -1 patch Hi, In Ubuntu, the attached patch was applied to achieve the following: * d/p/gcc-10.diff: Fix FTBFS with GCC 10. * d/p/pcap_init.

Bug#977081: fixed in pytest-rerunfailures 9.1.1-1

On Mon, 04 Jan 2021 04:49:07 + Paul Wise wrote: >* New upstream release. > - Increases pytest requirement to 5.0 > - Fixes FTBFS with pytest 6 (Closes: #977081) This hasn't migrated yet because of the pytest transition. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise signatur

Bug#980048: marked as done (FTBFS: -Werror=array-bounds in dlls/shell32/cpanelfolder.c)

Your message dated Sat, 16 Jan 2021 02:34:29 + with message-id and subject line Bug#980048: fixed in wine 5.0.3-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #980048, regarding FTBFS: -Werror=array-bounds in dlls/shell32/cpanelfolder.c to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Processed: Bug#978353 marked as pending in serf

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #978353 [src:serf] serf: FTBFS: tests failed with OpenSSL 1.1.1i Added tag(s) pending. -- 978353: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=978353 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#978353: marked as pending in serf

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #978353 in serf reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/jamessan/serf/-/commit/17baa8f922362010416a91dadbcada79c2c2d4

Bug#978353: serf: FTBFS: test_ssl_handshake fails with OpenSSL 1.1.1i

On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 08:36:22AM -0500, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > Sadly, my Debian sid box ran into other issues and is currently inaccessible. > > I *think* that this would address the 1.3.x test issues, but 1.3.x doesn't > build on Mac OS for me for other reasons...so, let me know how it goes

Bug#980193: [Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#980193: rust-flate2: autopkgtest regression in testing: [librust-flate2-dev] build failed

This test has never passed, it failed back in December 2019, then was neutral for some time, before returning to failure recently/ Unfortunately debci doesn't keep logs long-term, but I suspect that the test was neutral due to unsatisfiable test dependencies. The first error in the log is [cro

Bug#980202: FTBFS: gscan2pdf tests fail

Source: gscan2pdf Version: 2.10.2-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Tags: sid ftbfs While trying to rebuild gscan2pdf on a clean amd64 schroot using sbuild, I found this FTBFS: --8<---cut here---start->8--- ok 27 - POD test for blib/script/gscan

Bug#980194: [Pkg-privacy-maintainers] Bug#980194: mat2: autopkgtest regression in testing: AssertionError: ValueError not raised

Hi Paul, Thanks for telling! On 21-01-15 22:09:18, Paul Gevers wrote: > With a very recent change in testing the autopkgtest of your package > started to fail. I copied some of the output at the bottom of this > report. Can you please investigate the situation and fix it? I'm wondering if this i

Bug#980195: marked as done (ts-node: autopkgtest regression in testing: Cannot find name 'process')

Your message dated Fri, 15 Jan 2021 22:03:43 + with message-id and subject line Bug#980195: fixed in pkg-js-tools 0.9.63 has caused the Debian Bug report #980195, regarding ts-node: autopkgtest regression in testing: Cannot find name 'process' to be marked as done. This means that you claim t

Bug#980199: erlang: CVE-2020-35733

Source: erlang Version: 1:23.2.1+dfsg-1 Severity: grave Tags: security upstream Justification: user security hole X-Debbugs-Cc: car...@debian.org, Debian Security Team Hi, The following vulnerability was published for erlang. CVE-2020-35733[0]: | An issue was discovered in Erlang/OTP before 23.

Bug#953289: ABI change in libsoxr 0.1.3

Hi all, On Sat, 7 Mar 2020 09:57:02 +0100 Max Kellermann wrote: > Package: libsoxr0 > Version: 0.1.3-2 > > In version 0.1.3, libsoxr has made an undocumented ABI change which > causes MPD (Music Player Daemon) to crash: > > https://github.com/MusicPlayerDaemon/MPD/issues/773 > > The commit wh

Processed: Bug#980195 marked as pending in pkg-js-tools

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #980195 [pkg-js-autopkgtest] ts-node: autopkgtest regression in testing: Cannot find name 'process' Added tag(s) pending. -- 980195: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=980195 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.or

Bug#980195: marked as pending in pkg-js-tools

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #980195 in pkg-js-tools reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/pkg-js-tools/-/commit/d2739c95b6b1439c997dc3f

Processed: Re: ts-node: autopkgtest regression in testing: Cannot find name 'process'

Processing control commands: > reassign -1 pkg-js-autopkgtest Bug #980195 [src:ts-node] ts-node: autopkgtest regression in testing: Cannot find name 'process' Bug reassigned from package 'src:ts-node' to 'pkg-js-autopkgtest'. No longer marked as found in versions ts-node/9.1.1-4. Ignoring request

Bug#980195: ts-node: autopkgtest regression in testing: Cannot find name 'process'

Control: reassign -1 pkg-js-autopkgtest Control: affects -1 ts-node Le 15/01/2021 à 22:14, Paul Gevers a écrit : > Source: ts-node > Version: 9.1.1-4 > X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org > Severity: serious > User: debian...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: regression > > Dear maintainer(s), >

Bug#971754: ABI breakage from 1.4.1 to 1.4.2

On Fri, 2021-01-15 at 22:37 +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi Sebastian, > > On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 11:39:24 +0200 Sebastian =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dr=F6ge?= > wrote: > > Upstream fixed this now by making the soversion 1.4 and from now on > > guaranteeing that patch versions (1.4.0 -> 1.4.X) do not break ABI.

Bug#971754: ABI breakage from 1.4.1 to 1.4.2

Hi Sebastian, On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 11:39:24 +0200 Sebastian =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dr=F6ge?= wrote: > Upstream fixed this now by making the soversion 1.4 and from now on > guaranteeing that patch versions (1.4.0 -> 1.4.X) do not break ABI. > > It would make sense to backport that fix and then rename the

Bug#980195: ts-node: autopkgtest regression in testing: Cannot find name 'process'

Source: ts-node Version: 9.1.1-4 X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: regression Dear maintainer(s), With a very recent change in testing the autopkgtest of your package started to fail. I copied some of the output at the bottom of

Bug#980194: mat2: autopkgtest regression in testing: AssertionError: ValueError not raised

Source: mat2 Version: 0.12.0-1 X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: regression Dear maintainer(s), With a very recent change in testing the autopkgtest of your package started to fail. I copied some of the output at the bottom of th

Bug#980193: rust-flate2: autopkgtest regression in testing: [librust-flate2-dev] build failed

Source: rust-flate2 Version: 1.0.13-2 X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: regression Dear maintainer(s), With a recent in testing the autopkgtest of your package started to fail. I copied some of the output at the bottom of this re

Bug#972297: marked as done (scram: FTBFS with DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=reproducible=+fixfilepath)

Your message dated Fri, 15 Jan 2021 20:53:29 + with message-id and subject line Bug#972297: fixed in scram 0.16.2-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #972297, regarding scram: FTBFS with DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=reproducible=+fixfilepath to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the proble

Bug#980192: ruby-2.7: autopkgtest regression in testing: Errno::ENAMETOOLONG: File name too long

Source: ruby-2.7 Version: 2.7.2-3 X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: regression Dear maintainer(s), With a recent (december 2020) in testing the autopkgtest of your package started to fail. I copied some of the output at the botto

Bug#980132: openvswitch: CVE-2020-27827

Hi Thomas, On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 01:59:18PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Hi Thomas, > > On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 09:29:47AM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote: > > On 1/14/21 10:38 PM, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > > Source: openvswitch > > > Version: 2.15.0~git20210104.def6eb1ea+dfsg1-3 > >

Bug#980189: flask-security: CVE-2021-21241

On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 08:59:31PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: [...] > Admitelly the CVE description currently on MITRE is quite confusing > reffering to Flask-Security-Too package. But the other references > pointed out and reviewing the changes seem to apply to the original > project as we

Bug#947681: marked as done (libspring-java: build-depends on no longer available libjasperreports-java)

Your message dated Fri, 15 Jan 2021 20:59:07 +0100 with message-id <05f7ba55-1607-70e8-fd34-261f5f769...@debian.org> and subject line Re: libspring-java: build-depends on no longer available libjasperreports-java has caused the Debian Bug report #947681, regarding libspring-java: build-depends on

Bug#980189: flask-security: CVE-2021-21241

Source: flask-security Version: 3.4.2-2 Severity: grave Tags: security upstream Justification: user security hole Forwarded: https://github.com/Flask-Middleware/flask-security/issues/421 X-Debbugs-Cc: car...@debian.org, Debian Security Team Hi, The following vulnerability was published for flask

Bug#967126: marked as done (discover-data: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye)

Your message dated Fri, 15 Jan 2021 19:18:19 + with message-id and subject line Bug#967126: fixed in discover-data 2.2013.01.11+nmu1 has caused the Debian Bug report #967126, regarding discover-data: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye to be marked as done. This means that you claim th

Bug#979984: breaks on check with "NameError: name 'get_binary_stdin' is not defined"

This bug was fixed in version 1:1.0.0-6. Cheers, Timo

Bug#975365: marked as done (musl: CVE-2020-28928)

Your message dated Fri, 15 Jan 2021 18:34:31 + with message-id and subject line Bug#975365: fixed in musl 1.2.2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #975365, regarding musl: CVE-2020-28928 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the c

Processed: Bug#978640: undefined symbol: _ZTIN3fmt2v612format_errorE

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > package nheko Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'nheko' Limit currently set to 'package':'nheko' > fixed 978640 0.7.2-3 Bug #978640 {Done: Hubert Chathi } [nheko] undefined symbol: _ZTIN3fmt2v612format_errorE Marke

Bug#980172: kodi-pvr-hts: kodi crashes when switching to TV with pvr hts plugin activated and configured

Hi Vasyl, Am 15.01.21 um 17:47 schrieb Vasyl Gello: > If that works, the next upload wi.l fix the issue for general public. Wow, that was fast :-) Thank you all for your help, everything works fine now! Cheers Stephan

Bug#980172: kodi-pvr-hts: kodi crashes when switching to TV with pvr hts plugin activated and configured

Hi Stephan! Please install the test build available at https://fex.net/s/kkea8fe It is signed with my Debian key (changes file, buildinfo & dsc). If that works, the next upload wi.l fix the issue for general public. --  Vasyl Gello == Certified Soli

Processed: Re: Bug#980172: kodi-pvr-hts: kodi crashes when switching to TV with pvr hts plugin activated and configured

Processing control commands: > reassign -1 kodi Bug #980172 [kodi-pvr-hts] kodi-pvr-hts: kodi crashes when switching to TV with pvr hts plugin activated and configured Bug reassigned from package 'kodi-pvr-hts' to 'kodi'. No longer marked as found in versions kodi-pvr-hts/8.1.2+ds1-1. Ignoring re

Processed: Re: Bug#978954: pepperflashplugin-nonfree: should not be part of next stable Debian release

Processing control commands: > severity -1 important Bug #978954 [pepperflashplugin-nonfree] pepperflashplugin-nonfree: should not be part of next stable Debian release Severity set to 'important' from 'grave' > retitle -1 pepperflashplugin-nonfree: should not be part of bookworm Bug #978954 [pep

Bug#978954: pepperflashplugin-nonfree: should not be part of next stable Debian release

Control: severity -1 important Control: retitle -1 pepperflashplugin-nonfree: should not be part of bookworm On Tue, 12 Jan 2021 15:14:49 +0100 Gunnar Hjalmarsson wrote: > But let me add that even if Opera fixes that, users may think they want > to enable flash, try to install pepperflashplugin

Bug#980061: caribou: Segfault as regression of xorg CVE-2020-25712 fix that cause security issue for cinnamon

Prepared a MR: https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/caribou/-/merge_requests/2 Already tested build (http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/caribou/0.4.21-7.1~/buildlog ), installed and verified t

Bug#979689: marked as done (pepperflashplugin-nonfree: Installation script fails to download flash from adobe's servers)

Your message dated Fri, 15 Jan 2021 16:18:53 + with message-id and subject line Bug#979689: fixed in pepperflashplugin-nonfree 1.8.8 has caused the Debian Bug report #979689, regarding pepperflashplugin-nonfree: Installation script fails to download flash from adobe's servers to be marked as

Processed: affects 980168

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > affects 980168 nomad-driver-lxc Bug #980168 [golang-github-hashicorp-nomad-dev] Missing dependency causes nomad-driver-lxc FTBFS Added indication that 980168 affects nomad-driver-lxc > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you ne

Bug#980168: Missing dependency causes nomad-driver-lxc FTBFS

Package: golang-github-hashicorp-nomad-dev Version: 0.12.9+dfsg1-1 Severity: serious X-Debbugs-Cc: z...@debian.org https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rbuild/unstable/amd64/nomad-driver-lxc_0.3.0-1.rbuild.log.gz src/github.com/hashicorp/nomad/helper/mount/mount_linux.go:6:2: cannot find

Bug#980105: marked as done (zfsutils-linux: /usr/share/man/man1/arcstat.1.gz is already shipped by nordugrid-arc-client)

Your message dated Fri, 15 Jan 2021 14:54:07 + with message-id and subject line Bug#980105: fixed in zfs-linux 2.0.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #980105, regarding zfsutils-linux: /usr/share/man/man1/arcstat.1.gz is already shipped by nordugrid-arc-client to be marked as done. This me

Bug#906057: marked as done (linphone: Linphone "cannot start transport on port 5060, maybe this port is already used" although it is not.)

Your message dated Fri, 15 Jan 2021 15:43:51 +0100 with message-id and subject line Closing bugs opened for old Gtk client has caused the Debian Bug report #906057, regarding linphone: Linphone "cannot start transport on port 5060, maybe this port is already used" although it is not. to be marked

Processed: Merge #980042 and #980144

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 980042 grave Bug #980042 [mailutils] mailutils: movemail doesn't remove extracted emails Severity set to 'grave' from 'important' > merge 980042 980144 Bug #980042 [mailutils] mailutils: movemail doesn't remove extracted emails Bug #98014

Bug#980144: mailutils: movemail does not remove start mailbox when moving

>This appears to be a duplicate of #980042: > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=980042 It is. Sorry. Please merge. Thanks for your work -- Francesco Potortì (ricercatore)Voice: +39.050.621.3058 ISTI - Area della ricerca CNR Mobile: +39.348.8283.107 via G. Mo

Bug#980144: mailutils: movemail does not remove start mailbox when moving

Hello, This appears to be a duplicate of #980042: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=980042 Regards -- Florent

Bug#978353: serf: FTBFS: test_ssl_handshake fails with OpenSSL 1.1.1i

Sadly, my Debian sid box ran into other issues and is currently inaccessible. I *think* that this would address the 1.3.x test issues, but 1.3.x doesn't build on Mac OS for me for other reasons...so, let me know how it goes? =) -- justin Index: test/test_context.c ===

Bug#980132: openvswitch: CVE-2020-27827

Hi Thomas, On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 09:29:47AM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote: > On 1/14/21 10:38 PM, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > Source: openvswitch > > Version: 2.15.0~git20210104.def6eb1ea+dfsg1-3 > > Severity: grave > > Tags: security upstream > > Justification: user security hole > > X-Debbug

Bug#979534: wolfssl: CVE-2020-36177

On Thu, 07 Jan 2021 21:09:25 +0100 Salvatore Bonaccorso > The following vulnerability was published for wolfssl. CVE-2020-36177[0]: | RsaPad_PSS in wolfcrypt/src/rsa.c in wolfSSL before 4.6.0 has an out- | of-bounds write for certain relationships between key size and digest | size. If you fix

Processed: severity of 979597 is serious

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # should be fixed for bullseye ideally > severity 979597 serious Bug #979597 [src:cairosvg] cairosvg: CVE-2021-21236: Regular Expression Denial of Service (REDoS) Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > thanks Stopping processing here. Plea

Bug#979041: libopempi3: aborts python code due to libfabric fork() issues

Ugh. Thanks Drew. What are the contents of /etc/openmpi/openmpi-mca-params.conf on the node? Does a simple hello world (see Debian/tests/hello* ) work without errors in the environment ? Regards Alastair On 15/01/2021, 08:39, "Drew Parsons" wrote: Package: libopenmpi3 Version: 4.1.0-

Bug#957828: sparskit: ftbfs with GCC-10

Control: tag -1 patch Hi, I prepared a targeted patch to fix Gcc-10 issues with sparskit, and ran the embedded ./dotests to make sure it did not introduce any errors. This fixes the argument type mismatch in the csrcsc call by introducing the one dimension vector iziama of type real(8), instead

Processed: Re: sparskit: ftbfs with GCC-10

Processing control commands: > tag -1 patch Bug #957828 [src:sparskit] sparskit: ftbfs with GCC-10 Added tag(s) patch. -- 957828: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=957828 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#957471: marked as done (librcsb-core-wrapper: ftbfs with GCC-10)

Your message dated Fri, 15 Jan 2021 11:03:45 + with message-id and subject line Bug#957471: fixed in librcsb-core-wrapper 1.005-9 has caused the Debian Bug report #957471, regarding librcsb-core-wrapper: ftbfs with GCC-10 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has be

Bug#980144: mailutils: movemail does not remove start mailbox when moving

Package: mailutils Version: 1:3.11.1-4 Severity: grave X-Debbugs-Cc: none, Francesco Potortì File: /usr/bin/movemail.mailutils By chance, I installed mailutis from the unstable branch and I discovered that movemail does not work (while 1:3.10-3 works). This is mailutils (1:3.11.1-4) unstable; u

Bug#979041: libopempi3: aborts python code due to libfabric fork() issues

Package: libopenmpi3 Version: 4.1.0-5 Followup-For: Bug #979041 There's evidence this libfabric bug is not fully fixed. pytest-mpi (0.4-3) is failing tests: A process has executed an operation involving a call to the fork() system call to create a child process. As a result, the libfabr

Bug#957471: ready for upload: librcsb-core-wrapper: ftbfs with GCC-10

Dear Juhani, On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 11:51:05AM +0200, Juhani Numminen wrote: > > > > make[3]: Entering directory '/<>/common' > > libtool --mode=compile -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -c > > src/RcsbPlatform.C -o ./obj/RcsbPlatform.

Bug#957471: ready for upload: librcsb-core-wrapper: ftbfs with GCC-10

On Fri, 17 Apr 2020 11:04:53 + Matthias Klose wrote: > Package: src:librcsb-core-wrapper > Version: 1.005-8 > Severity: normal > Tags: sid bullseye > User: debian-...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-10 ... > > Making etc

Processed: Bug#957471 marked as pending in librcsb-core-wrapper

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #957471 [src:librcsb-core-wrapper] librcsb-core-wrapper: ftbfs with GCC-10 Added tag(s) pending. -- 957471: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=957471 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#957471: marked as pending in librcsb-core-wrapper

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #957471 in librcsb-core-wrapper reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/librcsb-core-wrapper/-/commit/30df69

Processed: severity of 979283 is important

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 979283 important Bug #979283 [ddccontrol] ddccontrol: FTBFS with glibc 2.30+ due to sys/io.h removal on arm Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 9792

Bug#980132: openvswitch: CVE-2020-27827

On 1/14/21 10:38 PM, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Source: openvswitch > Version: 2.15.0~git20210104.def6eb1ea+dfsg1-3 > Severity: grave > Tags: security upstream > Justification: user security hole > X-Debbugs-Cc: car...@debian.org, Debian Security Team > > Control: found -1 2.10.0+2018.08.28+gi

Bug#978220: marked as done (hylafax: FTBFS: Incompatible TIFF Library.)

Your message dated Fri, 15 Jan 2021 08:21:24 + with message-id and subject line Bug#978220: fixed in hylafax 3:6.0.7-3.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #978220, regarding hylafax: FTBFS: Incompatible TIFF Library. to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dea

Bug#978220: Bug#964198: hylafax: diff for NMU version 3:6.0.7-3.1

On Wed, 13 Jan 2021 15:08:31 +0100 Giuseppe Sacco wrote: > Hello Bastien, > thank you very much for your NMU. > > Bye, > Giuseppe > > Since this seems a maintainer ack, I'm rescheduling from deferred queue to now :) thanks! dcut ssh-upload reschedule -d 0 -f hylafax_6.0.7-3.1_source.changes