Bug#976687: marked as done (python3-escript: mixing incompatible libpython and libboost_python)

2020-12-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 11 Dec 2020 07:33:46 + with message-id and subject line Bug#976687: fixed in python-escript 5.6-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #976687, regarding python3-escript: mixing incompatible libpython and libboost_python to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#976845: marked as done (wxpython-tools needs source upload for Python 3.9 transition)

2020-12-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 11 Dec 2020 05:19:20 + with message-id and subject line Bug#976845: fixed in wxpython4.0 4.0.7+dfsg-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #976845, regarding wxpython-tools needs source upload for Python 3.9 transition to be marked as done. This means that you claim that t

Bug#976845: wxpython-tools needs source upload for Python 3.9 transition

2020-12-10 Thread Scott Talbert
On Wed, 9 Dec 2020, Adrian Bunk wrote: They probably don't. The tools are really just setuptools entry point scripts. The dependency is just coming from the shebang in those scripts I believe. In that case it should be fixed with override_dh_python3: dh_python3 --shebang=/usr/bin/pyt

Bug#976859: marked as done (fprintd: Impossible to verify: GDBus.Error:org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.AccessDenied: Rejected send message, 1 matched rules; type="method_call", sender=":1.235")

2020-12-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 11 Dec 2020 03:48:32 + with message-id and subject line Bug#976990: fixed in fprintd 1.90.7-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #976990, regarding fprintd: Impossible to verify: GDBus.Error:org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.AccessDenied: Rejected send message, 1 matched rules

Bug#976990: marked as done (fprintd: Latest update broke fprintd entirely)

2020-12-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 11 Dec 2020 03:48:32 + with message-id and subject line Bug#976990: fixed in fprintd 1.90.7-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #976990, regarding fprintd: Latest update broke fprintd entirely to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dea

Bug#976934: marked as done (notmuch: FTBFS on ppc64el: FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/<>/emacs/notmuch.rsti')

2020-12-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 11 Dec 2020 01:33:30 + with message-id and subject line Bug#976934: fixed in notmuch 0.31.2-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #976934, regarding notmuch: FTBFS on ppc64el: FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/<>/emacs/notmuch.rsti' to be marked as

Bug#976934: [PATCH] build/docs: move docstring prereq to file targets

2020-12-10 Thread David Bremner
Tomi Ollila writes: > On Wed, Dec 09 2020, David Bremner wrote: > >> Under a sufficiently high level of parallelism [1] there seems to be a >> a race condition that allows sphinx-build to start running before the >> docstrings are extracted. This change moves the docstring stamp from >> the phony

Bug#975486: marked as done (rust-libz-sys: autopkgtest failure: src/zlib/adler32.c: No such file or directory)

2020-12-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 11 Dec 2020 01:11:56 + with message-id and subject line rust-libz-sys has caused the Debian Bug report #975486, regarding rust-libz-sys: autopkgtest failure: src/zlib/adler32.c: No such file or directory to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#958604: marked as done (ircd-irc2: Build-Depends on deprecated dh-systemd which is going away)

2020-12-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 11 Dec 2020 00:48:22 + with message-id and subject line Bug#958604: fixed in ircd-irc2 2.11.2p3~dfsg-5.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #958604, regarding ircd-irc2: Build-Depends on deprecated dh-systemd which is going away to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#977109: ruby-licensee, autopkgtest failure with ruby-rugged 1.1.0

2020-12-10 Thread peter green
package: ruby-licensee Version: 8.9.2-1 Severity: serious Tags: bullseye, sid The autopkgtest for ruby-licensee is failing with ruby-rugged 1.1.0. GEM_PATH= ruby2.7 -e gem\ \"licensee\" /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/rubygems/specification.rb:1398:in `rescue in block in activate_dependencies': Coul

Bug#977108: ruby-gollum-rugged-adapter, autopkgtest failure with ruby-rugged 1.1.0

2020-12-10 Thread peter green
package: ruby-gollum-rugged-apapter Version: 0.4.4.2-2 Severity: serious The autopkgtest for ruby-gollum-rugged-adapter is failing with ruby-rugged 1.1.0. ┌──┐ │ Checking Rubygems dependency resolution on ruby2.7

Processed: your mail

2020-12-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > package fprintd Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'fprintd' Limit currently set to 'package':'fprintd' > severity 976859 grave Bug #976859 [fprintd] fprintd: Impossible to verify: GDBus.Error:org.freedesktop.DBus.E

Bug#977036: marked as done (skopeo: autopkgtest regression: cannot find package "github.com/containers/common/pkg/retry")

2020-12-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 10 Dec 2020 22:19:20 + with message-id and subject line Bug#977036: fixed in skopeo 1.2.0+dfsg1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #977036, regarding skopeo: autopkgtest regression: cannot find package "github.com/containers/common/pkg/retry" to be marked as done. Thi

Bug#976922: systemd-bootchart: FTBFS on ppc64el: dh_auto_test: error: make -j160 check VERBOSE=1 returned exit code 2

2020-12-10 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi, On 10/12/20 at 22:16 +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > Hi! > > On 12/10/20 10:12 PM, Michael Biebl wrote: > >> Did the test machine you used actually have that many cores? > > > > No idea > > I just checked plummer.debian.org and it has only 16 (virtual) CPUs. > > Would be curious

Bug#954270: marked as done (kmc: autopgktest times out on multimulticore hosts)

2020-12-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 10 Dec 2020 21:49:19 + with message-id and subject line Bug#954270: fixed in kmc 3.1.1+dfsg-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #954270, regarding kmc: autopgktest times out on multimulticore hosts to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has bee

Bug#977103: chromium: FTBFS on armhf: error: write to reserved register 'R7'

2020-12-10 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Source: chromium Version: 83.0.4103.116-3.1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) X-Debbugs-Cc: sramac...@debian.org chromium fails to build on armhf: | FAILED: obj/v8/v8_base_without_compiler/cpu-arm.o | clang++ -MMD -MF obj/

Bug#976922: systemd-bootchart: FTBFS on ppc64el: dh_auto_test: error: make -j160 check VERBOSE=1 returned exit code 2

2020-12-10 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 12/10/20 10:16 PM, Michael Biebl wrote: >>> Did the test machine you used actually have that many cores? >> >> No idea > > But given that there is only a single test, I wonder if that is really > relevant anyway. You're right. That's rather strange. Hmm. Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian

Bug#976922: systemd-bootchart: FTBFS on ppc64el: dh_auto_test: error: make -j160 check VERBOSE=1 returned exit code 2

2020-12-10 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Hi! On 12/10/20 10:12 PM, Michael Biebl wrote: >> Did the test machine you used actually have that many cores? > > No idea I just checked plummer.debian.org and it has only 16 (virtual) CPUs. Would be curious to hear whether Lucas' test machine had >= 160 CPUs. Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Ad

Bug#976922: systemd-bootchart: FTBFS on ppc64el: dh_auto_test: error: make -j160 check VERBOSE=1 returned exit code 2

2020-12-10 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 10.12.20 um 22:12 schrieb Michael Biebl: Am 10.12.20 um 22:10 schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz: Hi Michael! On 12/10/20 8:42 PM, Michael Biebl wrote: Testsuite summary for systemd-bootchart 233 =

Bug#976922: systemd-bootchart: FTBFS on ppc64el: dh_auto_test: error: make -j160 check VERBOSE=1 returned exit code 2

2020-12-10 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 10.12.20 um 22:10 schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz: Hi Michael! On 12/10/20 8:42 PM, Michael Biebl wrote: Testsuite summary for systemd-bootchart 233

Bug#976922: systemd-bootchart: FTBFS on ppc64el: dh_auto_test: error: make -j160 check VERBOSE=1 returned exit code 2

2020-12-10 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Hi Michael! On 12/10/20 8:42 PM, Michael Biebl wrote: > > Testsuite summary for systemd-bootchart 233 > > # TOTAL: 1 > # PASS: 1 > # SKIP: 0 >

Bug#954270: marked as pending in kmc

2020-12-10 Thread Étienne Mollier
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #954270 in kmc reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/kmc/-/commit/8e0202a8386094935f162aa9472b6e743dd858a0

Processed: Bug#954270 marked as pending in kmc

2020-12-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #954270 [src:kmc] kmc: autopgktest times out on multimulticore hosts Added tag(s) pending. -- 954270: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=954270 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#935674: marked as done (librust-blake2-rfc+clippy-dev/amd64 unsatisfiable Depends: librust-clippy-0.0.41+default-dev)

2020-12-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 10 Dec 2020 21:04:01 + with message-id and subject line Bug#935674: fixed in rust-blake2-rfc 0.2.18-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #935674, regarding librust-blake2-rfc+clippy-dev/amd64 unsatisfiable Depends: librust-clippy-0.0.41+default-dev to be marked as done.

Bug#975737: marked as done (src:bluebird-gtk-theme: fails to migrate to testing for too long: maintainer built arch:all binary)

2020-12-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 10 Dec 2020 20:48:26 + with message-id and subject line Bug#975737: fixed in bluebird-gtk-theme 1.3-2.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #975737, regarding src:bluebird-gtk-theme: fails to migrate to testing for too long: maintainer built arch:all binary to be marked a

Processed: Re: Bug#977083: pristine-tar: fails to checkout when there are multiple source tarballs

2020-12-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reassign -1 git-buildpackage Bug #977083 [pristine-tar,git-buildpackage,devscripts] pristine-tar: fails to checkout when there are multiple source tarballs Bug reassigned from package 'pristine-tar,git-buildpackage,devscripts' to 'git-buildpackage'. No longer marke

Bug#977083: pristine-tar: fails to checkout when there are multiple source tarballs

2020-12-10 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
Control: reassign -1 git-buildpackage Control: forcemerge 917789 -1 On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 01:39:35AM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: > Package: pristine-tar,git-buildpackage,devscripts > Control: found -1 pristine-tar/1.49 > Control: found -1 devscripts/2.20.5 > Control: found -1 git-buildpackage/0

Bug#956767: marked as done (fusion-icon: Depends on deprecated libappindicator)

2020-12-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 10 Dec 2020 20:36:02 + with message-id and subject line Bug#956767: fixed in fusion-icon 0.2.4-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #956767, regarding fusion-icon: Depends on deprecated libappindicator to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#977090: The 1.3.7a original tarball includes IETF RFCs documents

2020-12-10 Thread Francesco P. Lovergine
Source: proftpd-dfsg Version: 1.3.7a-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 As in subject, the RFCs need to be stripped before uploading a new upstream tarball, because not compliant to DFSG. That step was missed at the time of upload. -- Francesco P. Lovergine

Bug#977083: pristine-tar: fails to checkout when there are multiple source tarballs

2020-12-10 Thread Pirate Praveen
Package: pristine-tar,git-buildpackage,devscripts Control: found -1 pristine-tar/1.49 Control: found -1 devscripts/2.20.5 Control: found -1 git-buildpackage/0.9.20 severity: serious I'm filing against all 3 possible packages which might have a bug here. Example package node-mermaid. It fails on

Processed: pristine-tar: fails to checkout when there are multiple source tarballs

2020-12-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > found -1 pristine-tar/1.49 Bug #977083 [pristine-tar,git-buildpackage,devscripts] pristine-tar: fails to checkout when there are multiple source tarballs Marked as found in versions pristine-tar/1.49. > found -1 devscripts/2.20.5 Bug #977083 [pristine-tar,git-buildp

Bug#976922: systemd-bootchart: FTBFS on ppc64el: dh_auto_test: error: make -j160 check VERBOSE=1 returned exit code 2

2020-12-10 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 10.12.20 um 20:18 schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz: Hi Michael! On 12/10/20 7:53 PM, Michael Biebl wrote: Unfortunately, I can't reproduce the issue on a porter box (plummer). So I'm not sure if I can do something about it. It might be an issue with parallel jobs as Lucas built the packag

Processed: tagging 974546

2020-12-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 974546 + fixed-upstream Bug #974546 [src:klatexformula] klatexformula FTBFS: error: invalid use of incomplete type ‘class QPainterPath’ Added tag(s) fixed-upstream. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance

Bug#976838: marked as done (librocksdb.so: missing libdl linkage)

2020-12-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 10 Dec 2020 19:33:54 + with message-id and subject line Bug#976838: fixed in rocksdb 6.11.4-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #976838, regarding librocksdb.so: missing libdl linkage to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#895038: libappindicator: deprecated in Debian; AppIndicator based applications, please switch to Ayatana (App)Indicator(s)

2020-12-10 Thread Mike Gabriel
Hi Simon, On Do 10 Dez 2020 16:08:00 CET, Simon McVittie wrote: Control: severity -1 serious On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 at 14:37:21 +, Mike Gabriel wrote: On Do 10 Dez 2020 15:35:19 CET, Paul Gevers wrote: > We're running into the freeze of bullseye soon. The first bug I checked > is still onl

Processed: bug 975931 is forwarded to https://github.com/pocl/pocl/issues/889

2020-12-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 975931 https://github.com/pocl/pocl/issues/889 Bug #975931 [libllvm10,libllvm11] libgpuarray autopkgtest using pocl on armhf triggers segfault in LLVM Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://github.com/pocl/pocl/issues/889'. > thanks S

Bug#976922: systemd-bootchart: FTBFS on ppc64el: dh_auto_test: error: make -j160 check VERBOSE=1 returned exit code 2

2020-12-10 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Hi Michael! On 12/10/20 7:53 PM, Michael Biebl wrote: > Unfortunately, I can't reproduce the issue on a porter box (plummer). > So I'm not sure if I can do something about it. It might be an issue with parallel jobs as Lucas built the package with make -j160 and some packages can't cope with that

Processed: Re: Bug#976922: systemd-bootchart: FTBFS on ppc64el: dh_auto_test: error: make -j160 check VERBOSE=1 returned exit code 2

2020-12-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + unreproducible Bug #976922 [src:systemd-bootchart] systemd-bootchart: FTBFS on ppc64el: dh_auto_test: error: make -j160 check VERBOSE=1 returned exit code 2 Added tag(s) unreproducible. -- 976922: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=976922

Bug#976922: systemd-bootchart: FTBFS on ppc64el: dh_auto_test: error: make -j160 check VERBOSE=1 returned exit code 2

2020-12-10 Thread Michael Biebl
Control: tags -1 + unreproducible Hello Lucas Am 09.12.20 um 09:42 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum: Source: systemd-bootchart Version: 233-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on ppc64el Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201209 ftbfs-bullseye ftbfs-ppc64el Hi, During a rebuild of all pack

Bug#976764: marked as done (geophar needs source upload for Python 3.9 transition)

2020-12-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 10 Dec 2020 18:18:25 + with message-id and subject line Bug#976764: fixed in geophar 18.08.6+dfsg1-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #976764, regarding geophar needs source upload for Python 3.9 transition to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the probl

Bug#954270: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#954270: [RFS] kmc: arm64 autopkgtest time out

2020-12-10 Thread Étienne Mollier
Hi Andreas, Hi Paul, Paul Gevers, on 2020-12-10 13:50:59 +0100: > On 10-12-2020 13:10, Andreas Tille wrote: > > My guess is that kmc was developed under and designed for amd64 and it > > runs there. That's explicitly the case for the latest upstream version > > which will not support any arm* out

Bug#977038: Confirmed: build-dep on libgrpc-java fixes the issue

2020-12-10 Thread tony mancill
On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 04:51:53PM +0100, Sven Mueller wrote: > Hi. > > I just re-ran tests after adding a build dependency on libgrpc-java and > that fixed the reported issue. Hi Sven, Would you mind sharing the build logs for the failed build? It's fine if you send them to me directly. I'm n

Bug#977034: marked as done (libmaxminddb-dev: File conflict libmaxminddb-dev & libmaxminddb0)

2020-12-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 10 Dec 2020 17:34:14 + with message-id and subject line Bug#977034: fixed in libmaxminddb 1.4.3-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #977034, regarding libmaxminddb-dev: File conflict libmaxminddb-dev & libmaxminddb0 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that t

Processed: [bts-link] source package src:frr

2020-12-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package src:frr > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/ > # > user debian-bts-l...@lists.debian.org Setting

Processed: Re: Error importing plugin "pytest_tornasync": No module named 'pytest_tornasync'

2020-12-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 important Bug #976995 [python3-pytest] Error importing plugin "pytest_tornasync": No module named 'pytest_tornasync' Severity set to 'important' from 'grave' -- 976995: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=976995 Debian Bug Tracking System

Bug#976995: Error importing plugin "pytest_tornasync": No module named 'pytest_tornasync'

2020-12-10 Thread Christian Kastner
Control: severity -1 important Tags: -1 unreproducible Hi Julien, I'm downgrading because the pytest currently does work with hundreds of packages, implying that it cannot be (generally) unusable. On Wed, 09 Dec 2020 21:08:39 +0100 Julien Puydt wrote: > I was trying to update another package in

Bug#976189: marked as done (Catfish not starting anymore after installation of Python 3.9)

2020-12-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 10 Dec 2020 17:18:21 + with message-id and subject line Bug#976189: fixed in catfish 1.4.13-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #976189, regarding Catfish not starting anymore after installation of Python 3.9 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the prob

Processed: [bts-link] source package src:nipy

2020-12-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package src:nipy > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/ > # > user debian-bts-l...@lists.debian.org Settin

Bug#976906: Possible lex issue for ppc64el (Was: Bug#976906: libpll: FTBFS on ppc64el: lex_utree.l:22:10: fatal error: parse_utree.h: No such file or directory)

2020-12-10 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Mathieu, On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 11:10:17AM +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > "make -j160" > > that would be my guess :) This sounds pretty likely, thought. Thanks for the hint. > remove parallel from the dh option, and try again (fixes symptoms) To cure the real issue rather than the symp

Bug#977039: marked as done (pygrib: binary-any FTBFS)

2020-12-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 10 Dec 2020 17:03:44 + with message-id and subject line Bug#977039: fixed in pygrib 2.1.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #977039, regarding pygrib: binary-any FTBFS to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not

Bug#955552: marked as done (xpdf: FTBFS with poppler 0.85.0: error: 'getModRegion' was not declared in this scope)

2020-12-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 10 Dec 2020 17:04:00 + with message-id and subject line Bug#92: fixed in xpdf 3.04-14 has caused the Debian Bug report #92, regarding xpdf: FTBFS with poppler 0.85.0: error: 'getModRegion' was not declared in this scope to be marked as done. This means that yo

Processed: Bug#955552 marked as pending in xpdf

2020-12-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #92 [src:xpdf] xpdf: FTBFS with poppler 0.85.0: error: 'getModRegion' was not declared in this scope Added tag(s) pending. -- 92: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=92 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debi

Bug#955552: marked as pending in xpdf

2020-12-10 Thread Florian Schlichting
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #92 in xpdf reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/xpdf/-/commit/215057b1f8088fe263053f774b1013f048be50f6

Bug#976975: marked as done (vtk9 FTBFS with freetype 2.10.4)

2020-12-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 10 Dec 2020 16:49:05 + with message-id and subject line Bug#976975: fixed in vtk9 9.0.1+dfsg1-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #976975, regarding vtk9 FTBFS with freetype 2.10.4 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#976127: marked as done (python3-vtk9 needs Breaks+Replaces: python3-paraview (<< 5.9.0~rc1-1~))

2020-12-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 10 Dec 2020 16:49:05 + with message-id and subject line Bug#976127: fixed in vtk9 9.0.1+dfsg1-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #976127, regarding python3-vtk9 needs Breaks+Replaces: python3-paraview (<< 5.9.0~rc1-1~) to be marked as done. This means that you claim th

Bug#977012: octave-level-set FTBFS with Octave 6.1.0: error: ‘const class Array’ has no member named ‘length’

2020-12-10 Thread Sébastien Villemot
Le jeudi 10 décembre 2020 à 04:39 +0200, Adrian Bunk a écrit : > Source: octave-level-set > Version: 0.3.0-11 > Severity: serious > Tags: ftbfs I attach a patch that fixes the compilation of the source code (some functions were deprecated). But then there is a failure in the tests, which I don’t u

Bug#976901: nvidia-tesla-450-kernel-dkms: Fails to build DKMS kernel module on ppc64le 450.80.02

2020-12-10 Thread Konstantinos Margaritis
On 10/12/20 5:37 μ.μ., Andreas Beckmann wrote: If it works with Linux 5.8, can you stick to an older kernel (which will not receive security updates) until there is a newer driver release available from Nvidia? I just installed 5.8 from buster-backports along with tesla-440 driver and it seems

Bug#977038: Confirmed: build-dep on libgrpc-java fixes the issue

2020-12-10 Thread Sven Mueller
Hi. I just re-ran tests after adding a build dependency on libgrpc-java and that fixed the reported issue. Cheers, Sven

Bug#975796: marked as done (flit: FTBFS: ImportError: cannot import name 'build_thyself' from 'flit_core' (unknown location))

2020-12-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 10 Dec 2020 15:48:44 + with message-id and subject line Bug#975796: fixed in flit 3.0.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #975796, regarding flit: FTBFS: ImportError: cannot import name 'build_thyself' from 'flit_core' (unknown location) to be marked as done. This me

Bug#976934: [PATCH] build/docs: move docstring prereq to file targets

2020-12-10 Thread Tomi Ollila
On Wed, Dec 09 2020, David Bremner wrote: > Under a sufficiently high level of parallelism [1] there seems to be a > a race condition that allows sphinx-build to start running before the > docstrings are extracted. This change moves the docstring stamp from > the phony targets sphinx-html and sphi

Bug#976901: nvidia-tesla-450-kernel-dkms: Fails to build DKMS kernel module on ppc64le 450.80.02

2020-12-10 Thread Andreas Beckmann
On 12/10/20 10:37 AM, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote: > On 10/12/20 1:19 π.μ., Andreas Beckmann wrote: >> but I'm not sure whether it is worth backporting them, >> since you most likely will be affected by >> #973729 - nvidia-uvm does not work with Linux 5.9 >> which is fixed in 455.45.01 > > Well,

Bug#976994: marked as done (ccls: autopkgtest regression in testing: FAIL: test_response (__main__.TestLSP) [$ccls/info])

2020-12-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 10 Dec 2020 15:18:30 + with message-id and subject line Bug#976994: fixed in ccls 0.20201025-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #976994, regarding ccls: autopkgtest regression in testing: FAIL: test_response (__main__.TestLSP) [$ccls/info] to be marked as done. This m

Bug#972505: marked as done (pgl-ddl-deploy needs porting to PostgreSQL 13)

2020-12-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 10 Dec 2020 15:19:10 + with message-id and subject line Bug#972505: fixed in pgl-ddl-deploy 2.0.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #972505, regarding pgl-ddl-deploy needs porting to PostgreSQL 13 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has be

Processed: Re: Bug#895038: libappindicator: deprecated in Debian; AppIndicator based applications, please switch to Ayatana (App)Indicator(s)

2020-12-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #956779 [src:redshift] redshift: Depends on deprecated libappindicator Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' -- 956779: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=956779 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org wi

Processed: Re: Bug#895038: libappindicator: deprecated in Debian; AppIndicator based applications, please switch to Ayatana (App)Indicator(s)

2020-12-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #956776 [src:osdlyrics] osdlyrics: Depends on deprecated libappindicator Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' -- 956776: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=956776 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org

Processed: Re: Bug#895038: libappindicator: deprecated in Debian; AppIndicator based applications, please switch to Ayatana (App)Indicator(s)

2020-12-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #956774 [src:kylin-burner] kylin-burner: Depends on deprecated libappindicator Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' -- 956774: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=956774 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debi

Processed: Re: Bug#895038: libappindicator: deprecated in Debian; AppIndicator based applications, please switch to Ayatana (App)Indicator(s)

2020-12-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #956782 [src:zeal] zeal: Build-Depends (unnecessarily?) on deprecated libappindicator Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' -- 956782: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=956782 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bu

Processed: Re: Bug#895038: libappindicator: deprecated in Debian; AppIndicator based applications, please switch to Ayatana (App)Indicator(s)

2020-12-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #956778 [src:parcellite] parcellite: Depends on deprecated libappindicator Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' -- 956778: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=956778 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.or

Processed: Re: Bug#895038: libappindicator: deprecated in Debian; AppIndicator based applications, please switch to Ayatana (App)Indicator(s)

2020-12-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #956772 [src:hime] hime: Depends on deprecated libappindicator Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' -- 956772: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=956772 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with probl

Processed: Re: Bug#895038: libappindicator: deprecated in Debian; AppIndicator based applications, please switch to Ayatana (App)Indicator(s)

2020-12-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #956769 [src:gromit-mpx] gromit-mpx: Depends on deprecated libappindicator Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' -- 956769: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=956769 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.or

Processed: Re: Bug#895038: libappindicator: deprecated in Debian; AppIndicator based applications, please switch to Ayatana (App)Indicator(s)

2020-12-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #956767 [src:fusion-icon] fusion-icon: Depends on deprecated libappindicator Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' -- 956767: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=956767 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.

Processed: Re: Bug#895038: libappindicator: deprecated in Debian; AppIndicator based applications, please switch to Ayatana (App)Indicator(s)

2020-12-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #956766 [src:gcin] gcin: Build-Depends (unnecessarily?) on deprecated libappindicator Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' -- 956766: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=956766 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bu

Processed: Re: Bug#895038: libappindicator: deprecated in Debian; AppIndicator based applications, please switch to Ayatana (App)Indicator(s)

2020-12-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #956762 [autokey-gtk] autokey-gtk: Depends on deprecated libappindicator Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' -- 956762: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=956762 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org

Processed: Re: Bug#895038: libappindicator: deprecated in Debian; AppIndicator based applications, please switch to Ayatana (App)Indicator(s)

2020-12-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #956760 [src:cairo-dock-plug-ins] cairo-dock-plug-ins: (Build-)Depends on deprecated libindicator Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' -- 956760: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=956760 Debian Bug Tracking System Cont

Processed: Re: Bug#895038: libappindicator: deprecated in Debian; AppIndicator based applications, please switch to Ayatana (App)Indicator(s)

2020-12-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #921339 [psensor] Please switch to Ayatana AppIndicator Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' -- 921339: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=921339 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Re: Bug#895038: libappindicator: deprecated in Debian; AppIndicator based applications, please switch to Ayatana (App)Indicator(s)

2020-12-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #895038 [src:libindicator] libindicator: deprecated in Debian, switch to libayatana-indicator instead Ignoring request to change severity of Bug 895038 to the same value. -- 895038: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=895038 D

Processed: Re: Bug#895038: libappindicator: deprecated in Debian; AppIndicator based applications, please switch to Ayatana (App)Indicator(s)

2020-12-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #895037 [src:libappindicator] libappindicator: deprecated in Debian; AppIndicator based applications, please switch to Ayatana (App)Indicator(s) Ignoring request to change severity of Bug 895037 to the same value. -- 895037: https://bugs.de

Bug#895037: Bug#895038: libappindicator: deprecated in Debian; AppIndicator based applications, please switch to Ayatana (App)Indicator(s)

2020-12-10 Thread Simon McVittie
Control: severity -1 serious On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 at 14:37:21 +, Mike Gabriel wrote: > On Do 10 Dez 2020 15:35:19 CET, Paul Gevers wrote: > > We're running into the freeze of bullseye soon. The first bug I checked > > is still only severity important, so is it realistic to get this done > > be

Bug#966839: marked as done (openmm: withhold the package until a stable release)

2020-12-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 10 Dec 2020 15:05:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#966839: fixed in openmm 7.5.0+dfsg-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #966839, regarding openmm: withhold the package until a stable release to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Processed: owner 977038

2020-12-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > owner 977038 tmanc...@debian.org Bug #977038 [google-oauth-client-java] google-oauth-client-java: FTBFS: Failed to execute goal on project google-oauth-client: Could not resolve dependencies for project com.google.api-client:google-api-client:ja

Bug#976994: ccls: autopkgtest regression in testing: FAIL: test_response (__main__.TestLSP) [$ccls/info]

2020-12-10 Thread Shengjing Zhu
Control: tags -1 + pending On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 4:09 AM Paul Gevers wrote: > > Source: ccls > Version: 0.20201025-1 > X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org > Severity: serious > User: debian...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: regression > > Dear maintainer(s), > > With a recent change in testi

Processed: Re: Bug#976994: ccls: autopkgtest regression in testing: FAIL: test_response (__main__.TestLSP) [$ccls/info]

2020-12-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + pending Bug #976994 [src:ccls] ccls: autopkgtest regression in testing: FAIL: test_response (__main__.TestLSP) [$ccls/info] Added tag(s) pending. -- 976994: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=976994 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...

Bug#977000: marked as done (python3-apt: dak crashes after security update)

2020-12-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 10 Dec 2020 14:49:14 + with message-id and subject line Bug#977000: fixed in python-apt 2.1.7 has caused the Debian Bug report #977000, regarding python3-apt: dak crashes after security update to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been de

Bug#973493: marked as done (src:rust-log: fails to migrate to testing for too long: autopkgtest regression)

2020-12-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 10 Dec 2020 14:42:20 + with message-id and subject line Bug#973493: fixed in rust-log 0.4.11-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #973493, regarding src:rust-log: fails to migrate to testing for too long: autopkgtest regression to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#970463: marked as done (rust-log: autopkgtest regression can't find crate for `serde_test`)

2020-12-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 10 Dec 2020 14:42:20 + with message-id and subject line Bug#970463: fixed in rust-log 0.4.11-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #970463, regarding rust-log: autopkgtest regression can't find crate for `serde_test` to be marked as done. This means that you claim that th

Bug#973200: marked as done (powa-archivist: FTBFS: diff in generated debian/control)

2020-12-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 10 Dec 2020 15:44:22 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#973200: powa-archivist: FTBFS: diff in generated debian/control has caused the Debian Bug report #973200, regarding powa-archivist: FTBFS: diff in generated debian/control to be marked as done. This means

Bug#895038: libappindicator: deprecated in Debian; AppIndicator based applications, please switch to Ayatana (App)Indicator(s)

2020-12-10 Thread Mike Gabriel
Hi Paul, On Do 10 Dez 2020 15:35:19 CET, Paul Gevers wrote: Hi Mike, On Wed, 15 Apr 2020 19:06:59 + Mike Gabriel wrote: >> If you want to get this done for bullseye, please upgrade these bugs to >> serious. Autoremovals will take care of some of the packages. The rest will >> need ma

Bug#895038: libappindicator: deprecated in Debian; AppIndicator based applications, please switch to Ayatana (App)Indicator(s)

2020-12-10 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi Mike, On Wed, 15 Apr 2020 19:06:59 + Mike Gabriel wrote: > >> If you want to get this done for bullseye, please upgrade these bugs to > >> serious. Autoremovals will take care of some of the packages. The rest will > >> need manual fixes. > > > > I haven't done that. I think the severity o

Processed: bullseye ignore

2020-12-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > block -1 by 931197 Bug #939733 [lsb-release] lsb-release: lsb_release does not show point release on Debian 10.1 939733 was not blocked by any bugs. 939733 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 939733: 931197 > tags -1 bullseye-ignore Bug #939733 [lsb-

Bug#939733: bullseye ignore

2020-12-10 Thread Paul Gevers
Control: block -1 by 931197 Control: tags -1 bullseye-ignore Hi, The request to fix this in buster was turned down after some discussion. As such I'm not sure that this should be RC for lsb-release. Without changes, this needs to be fixed at the right time in base-files anyways (there's a bug ope

Processed: notfound 977034 in 1.3.2-1, found 977034 in 1.4.3-1

2020-12-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > notfound 977034 1.3.2-1 Bug #977034 [libmaxminddb-dev] libmaxminddb-dev: File conflict libmaxminddb-dev & libmaxminddb0 No longer marked as found in versions libmaxminddb/1.3.2-1. > found 977034 1.4.3-1 Bug #977034 [libmaxminddb-dev] libmaxminddb

Bug#976189: Catfish not starting anymore after installation of Python 3.9

2020-12-10 Thread Andreas Ronnquist
I have posted a merge request at https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/catfish/-/merge_requests/2 which fixes this. Please review and merge. /Andreas Rönnquist gus...@debian.org andr...@ronnquist.net

Bug#977039: pygrib: binary-any FTBFS

2020-12-10 Thread Adrian Bunk
Source: pygrib Version: 2.1.1-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=pygrib&suite=sid ... debian/rules override_dh_fixperms make[1]: Entering directory '/<>' dh_fixperms find debian/python3-grib -true -print0 2>/dev/null | xargs -0r chown --no-d

Bug#976619: marked as done (ts-node: required modules not declared as dependencies)

2020-12-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 10 Dec 2020 13:20:00 + with message-id and subject line Bug#976619: fixed in ts-node 9.1.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #976619, regarding ts-node: required modules not declared as dependencies to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#977038: google-oauth-client-java: FTBFS: Failed to execute goal on project google-oauth-client: Could not resolve dependencies for project com.google.api-client:google-api-client:jar:1.27.1: Canno

2020-12-10 Thread Sven Mueller
Package: google-oauth-client-java Version: 1.28.0-1 Severity: serious This can likely be fixed with a build dependency on grpc-java [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project google-oauth-client: Could not resolve dependencies for project com.google.oauth-client:google-oauth-client:jar:1.28.0: Can

Bug#976619: marked as pending in ts-node

2020-12-10 Thread Julien Puydt
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #976619 in ts-node reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/ts-node/-/commit/79aeb9d5e76194d8153cc23fdc010b4c4

Processed: Bug#976619 marked as pending in ts-node

2020-12-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #976619 [ts-node] ts-node: required modules not declared as dependencies Added tag(s) pending. -- 976619: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=976619 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#954270: [RFS] kmc: arm64 autopkgtest time out

2020-12-10 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi On 10-12-2020 13:10, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 11:58:23AM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: >>> In the kmc case I'm seriously wondering whether we should restrict >>> the architectures to those that are relevant in practice. It seems >>> to be in line with upstream and I'm tempted

Bug#954270: [RFS] kmc: arm64 autopkgtest time out

2020-12-10 Thread Andreas Tille
On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 11:58:23AM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: > > In the kmc case I'm seriously wondering whether we should restrict > > the architectures to those that are relevant in practice. It seems > > to be in line with upstream and I'm tempted to follow Étienne's > > suggestion to upgrade t

Bug#935313: missing ebtables dependency

2020-12-10 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi, @Gabriel, the BTS doesn't automatically forward replies to bugs to the submitter, if you want feedback, you need to send it manually. @Antoine, can you please give the feedback still? Paul On Fri, 23 Aug 2019 00:07:29 -0400 Gabriel Filion wrote: > Hello, > > On Wed, 21 Aug 2019 10:16:26 -

  1   2   >