Processing control commands:
> tags -1 upstream pending
Bug #973164 {Done: Bas Couwenberg }
[src:python-deprecated] python-deprecated: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild
--test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p "3.9 3.8" returned exit code 13
Added tag(s) upstream and pending.
--
973164: ht
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 973096 https://github.com/mozilla/bleach/issues/536
Bug #973096 [src:python-bleach] python-bleach: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error:
pybuild --test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p "3.9 3.8" returned exit code
13
Set Bug forwarded-to-addr
Control: tags -1 upstream pending
This is fixed upstream, the commit in question will be included as a patch.
Kind Regards,
Bas
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 973168 https://github.com/PyCQA/pylint/issues/3895
Bug #973168 [src:pylint] pylint: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test
--test-pytest -i python{version} -p "3.9 3.8" returned exit code 13
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://
On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 7:56 AM Martin Pitt wrote:
>
> Package: pcp
> Version: 5.2.1-1
> [...]
> But the "bpftrace" package only exists on a few architectures [1]. This is
> what
> makes the package uninstallable and prevents testing migration [2].
>
> Please fix
> that at least by restricting th
Package: python-is-python2
Version: 2.7.18-6
Severity: serious
Justifictaion: fails to install
Upgrading from "python" to "python-is-python" may fail:
| Unpacking python-is-python2 (2.7.18-6) ...
| dpkg: error processing archive
/var/cache/apt/archives/python-is-python2_2.7.18-6_all.deb (--unpac
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 973034 by 973191
Bug #973034 [src:supysonic] supysonic's autopkg tests are failing with python3.9
973034 was blocked by: 972717
973034 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 973034: 973191
> merge 972717 973191
Bug #972717 [src:
Your message dated Wed, 28 Oct 2020 03:48:47 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#971179: fixed in python-jenkinsapi 0.3.11-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #971179,
regarding python-jenkinsapi: FTBFS: Unable to create file
/sbuild-nonexistent/.pylint.d/jenkinsapi.views1.stats: [Errno 2]
Control: severity -1 important
Control: tags -1 unreproducible
On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 1:46 AM Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
> Source: delve
> Version: 1.5.0-4
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
> Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
> Usertags: ftbfs-20201027 ftbfs-bullseye
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 important
Bug #973136 [src:delve] delve: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
> tags -1 unreproducible
Bug #973136 [src:delve] delve: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error
Added tag(s) unreproducible.
--
973136: https://bugs.debian
Thanks for the report.
Looks like libcommons-io-java has been updated to 2.8.0.[1] We'll need
to patch both the Debian build and send a PR upstream to get it on the
newer version.
- e
[1]: https://packages.debian.org/sid/libcommons-io-java
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Your message dated Wed, 28 Oct 2020 02:33:25 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#947529: fixed in gnome-chemistry-utils 0.14.17-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #947529,
regarding gnome-chemistry-utils: build-depends on deprecated gnome-doc-utils
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Control: reassign -1 node-fetch
Control: affects -1 node-formidable
Le 27/10/2020 à 18:07, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
> Source: node-formidable
> Version: 1.2.1+20200129git8231ea6-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
> Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
> Usertags: ft
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 node-fetch
Bug #973170 [src:node-formidable] node-formidable: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error:
/bin/sh -ex debian/tests/pkg-js/test returned exit code 1
Bug reassigned from package 'src:node-formidable' to 'node-fetch'.
No longer marked as found in versions
Control: reassign -1 webpack
Control: affects -1 src:pdf.js
Le 27/10/2020 à 18:09, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
> Source: pdf.js
> Version: 2.6.347+dfsg-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
> Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
> Usertags: ftbfs-20201027 ftbfs-bullseye
>
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 webpack
Bug #973081 [src:pdf.js] pdf.js: FTBFS: [12:18:32] TypeError: Cannot read
property 'then' of undefined
Bug reassigned from package 'src:pdf.js' to 'webpack'.
No longer marked as found in versions pdf.js/2.6.347+dfsg-1.
Ignoring request to alter f
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 01:05:32PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Package: src:feature-check
> Version: 0.2.2-5
> Severity: serious
> Tags: sid bullseye
> User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: python3.9
This is the same as #972530, which was already fixed in 0.2.2-6 on
Monday, however t
Hi,
To me it looks like an issue in python-httpretty. I'll try to fix
httpretty and rebuild cloud-init, then probably close this bug.
Cheers,
Thomas Goirand (zigo)
973158
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: postgresql-filedump
Version: 12.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201027 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid
Your message dated Wed, 28 Oct 2020 01:21:08 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#973051: The generic bulseye image is configured
without metadata list
has caused the Debian Bug report #973051,
regarding The generic bulseye image is configured without metadata list
to be marked as done.
For the second error, I missed the "--term=" option to chnage the
default terminal, so the issue is only :
running "j4-dmenu-desktop", "dmenu" is missing. So "suckless-tools"
should be a dependency
Your message dated Wed, 28 Oct 2020 00:18:56 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#972468: fixed in nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-390xx
390.138-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #972468,
regarding nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-390xx: module build fails for kernel
5.9.0-1-amd64
to be mark
Thanks. Looks like I was accidentally using an undocumented method from
python3-debian that got renamed. I have a working and fix and will ask
my sponsor to upload it.
Hi,
Vlastimil, did you actually try to put some ini file in the relevant
folder, ie: /etc/uwsgi-emperor/vassals/ ? How did you test to tell that
it didn't work?
Cheers,
Thomas Goirand (zigo)
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 973034 - fixed pending patch
Bug #973034 [src:supysonic] supysonic's autopkg tests are failing with python3.9
Removed tag(s) fixed.
> merge 972717 973191
Bug #972717 [src:supysonic] supysonic fails tests with python3.9
Unable to merge bugs be
rce: geneweb
> Version: 6.08+git20181019+dfsg-2
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
> Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
> Usertags: ftbfs-20201027 ftbfs-bullseye
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> on amd64.
>
>
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 04:54:13PM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Testing to start the OpenStack image (well, the "genericcloud" image), I
> couldn't login into it, because there isn't any metadata service configured
> in it.
This is incorrect. The package uses
/lib/systemd/system-generators/clou
Control: tags 957814 + patch
Control: tags 957814 + pending
--
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for sma (versioned as 1.4-3.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should cancel it.
--
Regards
Sudip
diff -Nru sma-1.4/debian/changelog sma-1.4/debian/changelog
--- s
Processing control commands:
> tags 957814 + patch
Bug #957814 [src:sma] sma: ftbfs with GCC-10
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 957814 + pending
Bug #957814 [src:sma] sma: ftbfs with GCC-10
Added tag(s) pending.
--
957814: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=957814
Debian Bug Tracking S
Your message dated Tue, 27 Oct 2020 22:55:30 +0100
with message-id <20201027215530.qz4p7ky3ejgskvx4@crossbow>
and subject line Re: Bug#972919: ycmd ftbfs with python3.9
has caused the Debian Bug report #972919,
regarding ycmd ftbfs with python3.9
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim tha
in Message ---
Source: ros-vcstools
Version: 0.1.42-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201027 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> dpkg
Your message dated Tue, 27 Oct 2020 21:18:37 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#972920: fixed in dicomscope 3.6.0-22
has caused the Debian Bug report #972920,
regarding dicomscope: binary-all FTBFS
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If th
Hi,
This appears to be caused by the recent upgrade of Apache commons-io to
version 2.8.0 (we had 2.6), see also #973135. In version 2.7 they
removed a throws IOException in the method isSymlink()
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-610
Could it be related to this change? It is probably nec
Your message dated Tue, 27 Oct 2020 22:04:05 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#972957: fixed in libudev0-shim 1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #972957,
regarding libudev0-shim FTBFS: cannot find -ludev
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi
: 10.2.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201027 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory '/<>'
>
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #973220 in node-libnpx reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-libnpx/-/commit/4e8f27730a2e49497e38675e0
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #973220 {Done: Xavier Guimard } [src:node-libnpx]
node-libnpx: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: /bin/sh -ex debian/tests/pkg-js/test
returned exit code 123
Added tag(s) pending.
--
973220: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=973220
Deb
On Tue, 27 Oct 2020 18:06:31 +0100 Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: libcxx-serial
> Version: 1.2.1-3
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
> Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
> Usertags: ftbfs-20201027 ftbfs-bullseye
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packag
Version: 0.5.12+ds-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201027 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering directory '/<>/
Your message dated Tue, 27 Oct 2020 20:41:20 +
with message-id <20201027204120.ynpngietrvfmllp3@debian>
and subject line Re: jodreports: FTBFS: error: package freemarker.template does
not exist
has caused the Debian Bug report #828781,
regarding jodreports: FTBFS: error: package freemarker.tem
On Tue, 27 Oct 2020, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > > Caused by: java.io.IOException: Unable to delete file:
> > > targets/unit-test-wd/ch.systemsx.cisd.base.unix.UnixTests/someDanglingLink
> > > at org.apache.commons.io.FileUtils.forceDelete(FileUtils.java:1425)
> > > at org.apache.commons.io.File
Version: 3.4.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201027 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory '/<>'
>
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #973065 [src:node-zipfile] node-zipfile: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error:
/bin/sh -ex debian/tests/pkg-js/test returned exit code 4
Added tag(s) pending.
--
973065: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=973065
Debian Bug Tracking System
C
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #973065 in node-zipfile reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-zipfile/-/commit/c5751443426fdc49c07399b
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 973034 fixed
Bug #973034 [src:supysonic] supysonic's autopkg tests are failing with python3.9
Added tag(s) fixed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
973034: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrep
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 973242 https://github.com/OpenRC/opentmpfiles/issues/4
Bug #973242 [opentmpfiles] CVE-2017-18925
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://github.com/OpenRC/opentmpfiles/issues/4'.
> tags 973242 + upstream
Bug #973242 [opentmpfiles] CVE-
Control: tags 957138 + patch
Control: tags 957138 + pending
--
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for directvnc (versioned as 0.7.7-1.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should cancel it.
--
Regards
Sudip
diff -Nru directvnc-0.7.7/debian/changelog directvnc-0.7.
Processing control commands:
> tags 957138 + patch
Bug #957138 [src:directvnc] directvnc: ftbfs with GCC-10
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 957138 + pending
Bug #957138 [src:directvnc] directvnc: ftbfs with GCC-10
Added tag(s) pending.
--
957138: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=9571
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 help
Bug #973070 [src:libsis-base-java] libsis-base-java: FTBFS: Could not delete
the directory targets/unit-test-wd/ch.systemsx.cisd.base.unix.UnixTests
because: 1 exceptions: [java.io.IOException: Unable to delete file:
targets/unit-test-wd/ch.systemsx.c
ase-java
> Version: 18.09~pre1+git20180827.fe4953e+dfsg-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
> Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
> Usertags: ftbfs-20201027 ftbfs-bullseye
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> on amd
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #973207 in node-chokidar reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-chokidar/-/commit/87de610caea7ae5378115
ng
Version: 0.0.20+ds-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201027 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules build
> dh build --with pytho
Your message dated Tue, 27 Oct 2020 19:33:29 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#971180: fixed in ipython 7.18.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #971180,
regarding ipython: FTBFS: Could not import extension
IPython.sphinxext.ipython_console_highlighting (exception: No module named
'dec
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #973207 [src:node-chokidar] node-chokidar: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error:
/bin/sh -ex debian/tests/pkg-js/test returned exit code 1
Added tag(s) pending.
--
973207: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=973207
Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 upstream pending
Bug #973177 {Done: Bas Couwenberg } [src:python-geojson]
python-geojson: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test -i python{version}
-p "3.9 3.8" returned exit code 13
Added tag(s) upstream and pending.
--
973177: https://bugs.debian.or
Control: tags -1 upstream pending
This is fixed upstream, the commit in question will be included as a patch.
Kind Regards,
Bas
: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201027 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> dpkg-buildpackage
> -
>
> Command: dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc -sa -rfak
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 973191 by 972484
Bug #973191 [src:supysonic] supysonic: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild
--test -i python{version} -p "3.9 3.8" returned exit code 13
973191 was not blocked by any bugs.
973191 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bu
Am 27.10.20 um 20:10 schrieb Gregor Riepl:
>> https://salsa.debian.org/games-team/renpy/commit/fc29ebfe106238b590a7896450a5d1ad1f94f84e
>>
>>
>> Switch to python3.
>>
>> Closes: #938351
>> -
tags -1 fixed
block 973034 by 972717
thanks
This has been fixed in the VCS already [1], but a new revision can't be
uploaded since this package FTBFS with python3.9
[1]:
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/supysonic/-/commit/e187fd03c2c22939778f870f07fbfada50b9ada7
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒
> https://salsa.debian.org/games-team/renpy/commit/fc29ebfe106238b590a7896450a5d1ad1f94f84e
>
>
> Switch to python3.
>
> Closes: #938351
>
I'm confuse
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags -1 fixed
Failed to alter tags of Bug -1: The 'bug' parameter ("-1") to
Debbugs::Control::set_tag did not pass regex check
.
> block 973034 by 972717
Bug #973034 [src:supysonic] supysonic's autopkg tests are failing with python3.9
973034 was
with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: gqrx-sdr
Version: 2.13.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201027 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /us
Your message dated Tue, 27 Oct 2020 19:03:29 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#973008: fixed in gnuradio 3.8.2.0-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #973008,
regarding gr-gsm: FTBFS in unstable
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this i
Your message dated Tue, 27 Oct 2020 19:03:29 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#973007: fixed in gnuradio 3.8.2.0-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #973007,
regarding gr-air-modes: FTBFS in unstable
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201027 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory '/<>'
> node s
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #973109 in node-react reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-react/-/commit/074c9aa2c0d69834981c6ffa944
--- Begin Message ---
Source: python-deprecated
Version: 1.2.10-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201027 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debia
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #973109 {Done: Xavier Guimard } [src:node-react]
node-react: FTBFS: TypeError: invalid options argument
Added tag(s) pending.
--
973109: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=973109
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debia
---
Source: python-geojson
Version: 2.5.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201027 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules build
>
Package: opentmpfiles
Severity: grave
Tags: security
X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian Security Team
This was assigned CVE-2017-18925:
https://github.com/OpenRC/opentmpfiles/issues/4
Cheers,
Moritz
Source: python-smoke-zephyr
Version: 2.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201027 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> dpkg-buildpack
Source: ktorrent
Version: 5.2.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201027 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin/ld: CMakeFi
Source: kio-extras
Version: 4:19.12.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201027 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin/ld:
> CMak
Source: neo
Version: 0.7.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201027 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering direct
Source: python-fedora
Version: 0.10.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201027 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering direct
Source: dh-cmake
Version: 0.6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201027 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> dpkg-buildpack
Source: weechat-el
Version: 0.5.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201027 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering direct
Source: minexpert2
Version: 7.2.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201027 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cd /<>/debian/build/sr
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 972717 serious
Bug #972717 [src:supysonic] supysonic fails tests with python3.9
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> merge 972717 973191 973034
Bug #972717 [src:supysonic] supysonic fails tests with python3.9
Unable to merge bugs
Source: websploit
Version: 4.0.4-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201027 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> dpkg-buildpack
Source: python-murano-pkg-check
Version: 0.3.0-6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201027 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: cura
Version: 4.7.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201027 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering directory '
Source: python-django-celery-beat
Version: 1.1.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201027 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: soundkonverter
Version: 3.0.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201027 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cd /<>/obj-x86_64-
Source: typedload
Version: 2.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201027 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering direct
Source: golang-gopkg-alecthomas-kingpin.v3
Version: 3.0~git20180227.b8d601d-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201027 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part
Source: pypng
Version: 0.0.20+ds-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201027 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules build
> dh
Source: node-libnpx
Version: 10.2.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201027 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering direct
Source: localslackirc
Version: 1.10-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201027 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering direct
Source: python-fixtures
Version: 3.0.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201027 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering direct
Source: tinc
Version: 1.0.36-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201027 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> checking build system type... x86
Source: uwsgi-apparmor
Version: 0.0.0+git.2014.09.15.7d6d7bd7eb-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201027 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: golang-github-c-bata-go-prompt
Version: 0.2.3+git20181109.b6d2b43-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201027 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part
Source: ruby-redis-rack
Version: 2.1.2-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201027 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> ArgumentError: unkn
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #947529 [src:gnome-chemistry-utils] gnome-chemistry-utils: build-depends on
deprecated gnome-doc-utils
Added tag(s) pending.
--
947529: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=947529
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian
Your message dated Tue, 27 Oct 2020 18:34:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#972728: fixed in python-latexcodec 2.0.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #972728,
regarding python-latexcodec: ftbfs with python 3.9 as supported version
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Tue, 27 Oct 2020 18:34:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#973032: fixed in python-latexcodec 2.0.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #973032,
regarding python-latexcodec's autopkg tests are failing with python3.9
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #947529 in gnome-chemistry-utils reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/debichem-team/gnome-chemistry-utils/-/commit
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #973117 in node-parse-json reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-parse-json/-/commit/aa1db8000f87e737b
1 - 100 of 308 matches
Mail list logo
