Bug#972251: python-line-profiler: diff for NMU version 2.1-2.1

Hi Stefano On Fri, 16 Oct 2020 at 08:15, Stefano Rivera wrote: > I've prepared an NMU for python-line-profiler (versioned as 2.1-2.1) and > uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I > should delay it longer. Thanks for working on this. I don't see any problems if you want to re

Bug#972291: marked as done (python-py2bit: Mistake in the Architecture: field)

Your message dated Fri, 16 Oct 2020 06:35:41 + with message-id and subject line Bug#972291: fixed in python-py2bit 0.3.0-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #972291, regarding python-py2bit: Mistake in the Architecture: field to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#972251: python-line-profiler: diff for NMU version 2.1-2.1

Control: tags 972251 + patch Control: tags 972251 + pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for python-line-profiler (versioned as 2.1-2.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Regards, SR diff -Nru python-line-profiler-2.1/debian/changelo

Processed: python-line-profiler: diff for NMU version 2.1-2.1

Processing control commands: > tags 972251 + patch Bug #972251 [src:python-line-profiler] python-line-profile ftbfs in unstable Added tag(s) patch. > tags 972251 + pending Bug #972251 [src:python-line-profiler] python-line-profile ftbfs in unstable Added tag(s) pending. -- 972251: https://bugs.d

Bug#972028: python-acora: diff for NMU version 2.2-1.3

Control: tags 972028 + patch Control: tags 972028 + pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for python-acora (versioned as 2.2-1.3) and uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Regards, SR diff -Nru python-acora-2.2/debian/changelog python-acora-2

Processed: python-acora: diff for NMU version 2.2-1.3

Processing control commands: > tags 972028 + patch Bug #972028 [src:python-acora] python-acora ftbfs with python3.9 as supported python version Added tag(s) patch. > tags 972028 + pending Bug #972028 [src:python-acora] python-acora ftbfs with python3.9 as supported python version Added tag(s) pe

Processed: tagging 972032

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 972032 + pending Bug #972032 [src:setools] python-setools ftbfs with python3.9 as supported python version Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 972032: https://bugs.debian.or

Bug#972317: FTBFS on ppc64el

Package: src:llvm-toolchain-9 Version: 1:9.0.1-14 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Dear Maintainer, Your package FTBFS on ppc64el: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=llvm-toolchain-9 The rebuild was triggered by the update of OCaml from 4.08.1 to 4.11.1, but the error looks independe

Bug#972318: FTBFS on ppc64el

Package: src:llvm-toolchain-10 Version: 1:10.0.1-6 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Dear Maintainer, Your package FTBFS on ppc64el: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=llvm-toolchain-10 The rebuild was triggered by the update of OCaml from 4.08.1 to 4.11.1, but the error looks indepen

Processed: pymongo: diff for NMU version 3.10.0-2.1

Processing control commands: > tags 972207 + patch Bug #972207 [src:pymongo] pymongo ftbfs with python3.9 as supported python3 version Added tag(s) patch. > tags 972207 + pending Bug #972207 [src:pymongo] pymongo ftbfs with python3.9 as supported python3 version Added tag(s) pending. -- 972207

Bug#972207: pymongo: diff for NMU version 3.10.0-2.1

Control: tags 972207 + patch Control: tags 972207 + pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for pymongo (versioned as 3.10.0-2.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Regards, SR diff -Nru pymongo-3.10.0/debian/changelog pymongo-3.10.0/deb

Bug#957439: marked as done (libforms: ftbfs with GCC-10)

Your message dated Fri, 16 Oct 2020 03:35:32 + with message-id and subject line Bug#957439: fixed in libforms 1.2.3-1.6 has caused the Debian Bug report #957439, regarding libforms: ftbfs with GCC-10 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this

Bug#972296: phpmyadmin: missing dependency (php-twig >= 2.9)

Package: phpmyadmin Version: 4:4.9.5+dfsg1-2~bpo10+1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Dear Maintainer, *** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate *** * What led up to the situation? * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effect

Processed: reopening 957439

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reopen 957439 Bug #957439 {Done: Paul Wise } [src:libforms] libforms: ftbfs with GCC-10 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them. Bug reopened No

Processed: bug 957439 is forwarded to https://git.savannah.nongnu.org/cgit/xforms.git/commit/?id=9806bce102d0c079c2c486b25ae6bdac3c98eecf https://git.savannah.nongnu.org/cgit/xforms.git/commit/?id=2c1

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 957439 > https://git.savannah.nongnu.org/cgit/xforms.git/commit/?id=9806bce102d0c079c2c486b25ae6bdac3c98eecf > > https://git.savannah.nongnu.org/cgit/xforms.git/commit/?id=2c1a9f151baf50887a517280645ec23379fb96f8 Bug #957439 {Done: Pa

Processed: bug 957439 is forwarded to https://git.savannah.nongnu.org/cgit/xforms.git/commit/?id=9806bce102d0c079c2c486b25ae6bdac3c98eecf

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 957439 > https://git.savannah.nongnu.org/cgit/xforms.git/commit/?id=9806bce102d0c079c2c486b25ae6bdac3c98eecf Bug #957439 {Done: Paul Wise } [src:libforms] libforms: ftbfs with GCC-10 Changed Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://git.sa

Bug#957439: marked as done (libforms: ftbfs with GCC-10)

Your message dated Fri, 16 Oct 2020 02:52:10 + with message-id and subject line Bug#957439: fixed in libforms 1.2.3-1.5 has caused the Debian Bug report #957439, regarding libforms: ftbfs with GCC-10 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this

Bug#966968: efp: FTBFS: efp.a65:line 89: 8000:Illegal segment error

On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 10:58:11AM +0200, Nicolas Boulenguez wrote: > Package: src:efp > Followup-For: Bug #966968 > > asm_to_a65.pl translates efp.asm (DASM format) to efp.a65 (XA65 > format). The related lines are: > # "org FOO" ==> "*=FOO" > s/\s*org\s+/*=/; > and >

Processed: tagging 952741

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 952741 + bullseye sid Bug #952741 [src:puma] [RFH] FTBFS: Tests sometimes get stuck and the build gets forcefully terminated Added tag(s) bullseye and sid. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 952

Processed: bug 972232 is forwarded to https://github.com/cooperative-computing-lab/cctools/commit/984f955fcf42c0c8293296a4beb568417d0b5a60

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 972232 > https://github.com/cooperative-computing-lab/cctools/commit/984f955fcf42c0c8293296a4beb568417d0b5a60 Bug #972232 [src:cctools] cctools FTBFS on i386 with glibc 2.31 Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://github.com/cooperati

Processed: tagging 972232

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 972232 + patch fixed-upstream Bug #972232 [src:cctools] cctools FTBFS on i386 with glibc 2.31 Added tag(s) patch and fixed-upstream. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 972232: https://bugs.debian

Bug#972216: nmap: New NPSL 0.92 license likely non-free

control: severity -1 normal Hi Göran, thanks for your bug report. I think that the issue is less serious than it seems at first glance (see below). At the moment, I'm inclined to update debian/copyright (which must be done anyway), close the issue, and be done with this. The alternatives would b

Processed: Re: Bug#972216: nmap: New NPSL 0.92 license likely non-free

Processing control commands: > severity -1 normal Bug #972216 [nmap] nmap: New NPSL 0.92 license likely non-free Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious' -- 972216: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=972216 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#972016: marked as done (py-lmdb ftbfs with python3.9)

Your message dated Thu, 15 Oct 2020 23:35:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#972016: fixed in py-lmdb 1.0.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #972016, regarding py-lmdb ftbfs with python3.9 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this i

Bug#957979: marked as done (xfce4-cpufreq-plugin: ftbfs with GCC-10)

Your message dated Thu, 15 Oct 2020 22:58:01 + with message-id and subject line Bug#957979: fixed in xfce4-cpufreq-plugin 1.2.2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #957979, regarding xfce4-cpufreq-plugin: ftbfs with GCC-10 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has be

Processed: Re: Bug#972241: FTBFS on amd64 and i386 (error: guestfs_launch failed)

Processing control commands: > tag -1 confirmed Bug #972241 [src:libguestfs] FTBFS on amd64 and i386 (error: guestfs_launch failed) Added tag(s) confirmed. > tag -1 pending Bug #972241 [src:libguestfs] FTBFS on amd64 and i386 (error: guestfs_launch failed) Added tag(s) pending. -- 972241: http

Bug#972241: FTBFS on amd64 and i386 (error: guestfs_launch failed)

control: tag -1 confirmed control: tag -1 pending * Stéphane Glondu: > Package: src:libguestfs > Version: 1:1.42.0-9 > Severity: serious > Tags: ftbfs > > Dear Maintainer, > > Your package FTBFS on amd64 and i386: > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=libguestfs&suite=sid > > The

Processed: tagging 972016

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 972016 + pending Bug #972016 [src:py-lmdb] py-lmdb ftbfs with python3.9 Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 972016: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=972016 D

Bug#972291: python-py2bit: Mistake in the Architecture: field

Source: python-py2bit Version: 0.3.0-5 Severity: serious Control: block 969757 by -1 python-py2bit (0.3.0-5) unstable; urgency=medium ... * Restrict architectures to those where build time test is passing Closes: #969757 ... The list of "build time test is passing" architectures are exactl

Processed: python-py2bit: Mistake in the Architecture: field

Processing control commands: > block 969757 by -1 Bug #969757 {Done: Andreas Tille } [src:python-py2bit] src:python-py2bit: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on s390x 969757 was not blocked by any bugs. 969757 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 969757: 972291 -- 9

Bug#901382: marked as done (node-katex: must build binary packages fonts-katex and libjs-katex)

Your message dated Thu, 15 Oct 2020 22:00:23 + with message-id and subject line Bug#901382: fixed in node-katex 0.10.2+dfsg-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #901382, regarding node-katex: must build binary packages fonts-katex and libjs-katex to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Processed: affects 971118

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > affects 971118 src:breezy Bug #971118 [src:dulwich] ERROR: test_send_remove_branch (dulwich.tests.compat.test_client.DulwichTCPClientTest) Added indication that 971118 affects src:breezy > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if yo

Bug#972185: libre0: stack smashing detected in v1.1.0

Hello Kevin, I don't know the details, but I guess there will no automatic rebuild of baresip triggered on migration. As far as I see [1], the only users of libre0 are baresip and librem0, so I guess both might need a rebuild. Maybe someone with more shared library packaging knowledge might give so

Bug#971972: marked as done (vde-switch,vde-wirefilter,vdeplug: Miissing Breaks + Replaces headers: "trying to overwrite '/usr/bin/…', which is also in package vde2 2.3.2+r586-2.2+b1")

Your message dated Thu, 15 Oct 2020 20:45:21 + with message-id and subject line Bug#971972: fixed in vde2 2.3.2+r586-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #971972, regarding vde-switch,vde-wirefilter,vdeplug: Miissing Breaks + Replaces headers: "trying to overwrite '/usr/bin/…', which is also in

Bug#972288: openjdk-11 FTBFS with gcc-10

Source: openjdk-11 Version: 11.0.8+10-1.1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs openjdk-11 fails to build from source due to gcc-10 defaulting to -fno-commons. https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rbuild/bullseye/amd64/openjdk-11_11.0.8+10-1.1.rbuild.log.gz | /usr/bin/ld: /build/openjdk-11-11.0.

Bug#972285: Needs porting to PostgreSQL 13

Package: postgresql-12-python3-multicorn Version: 1.4.0-2 Severity: serious Multicorn needs to be ported to PostgreSQL 13, but unfortunately upstream isn't ready yet: https://github.com/Segfault-Inc/Multicorn/issues/261 https://github.com/Segfault-Inc/Multicorn/pull/260 This bug is to keep Multi

Processed: severity of 972281 is normal

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 972281 normal Bug #972281 [linux-source-5.8] linux-source-5.8: Fails to compile with no LKMs if no Module.symvers Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 9

Bug#972281: linux-source-5.8: Fails to compile with no LKMs if no Module.symvers

nel: Linux 5.8.10-20201015 (SMP w/2 CPU threads) Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_GB:en Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) Versions of packages linux-source-5.8 depends on: ii binutils 2.35.1-1 ii xz-utils

Bug#971831: marked as done (autopkg test depends on unavailable package adequate)

Your message dated Thu, 15 Oct 2020 19:21:00 + with message-id and subject line Bug#971831: fixed in task 2.5.1+dfsg-11 has caused the Debian Bug report #971831, regarding autopkg test depends on unavailable package adequate to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Processed: tagging 972251

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 972251 + ftbfs Bug #972251 [src:python-line-profiler] python-line-profile ftbfs in unstable Added tag(s) ftbfs. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 972251: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrepor

Processed: transition: qtbase-opensource-src

Processing control commands: > block -1 by 957436 972154 972155 972156 972157 972158 972160 972175 972176 > 972177 972178 972179 Bug #972278 [release.debian.org] transition: qtbase-opensource-src 972278 was not blocked by any bugs. 972278 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 972278

Bug#935115: passing variable assignments to functions (was Re: Bug#935115: bash: [regression] passing variable assignments to functions broken in POSIX mode, violating POSIX)

looks like it has been fixed, i can't reproduce in either unstable, testing or stable by the moment of now.

Processed: severity of 958476 is serious

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 958476 serious Bug #958476 [python3-gevent] python3-gevent: gevent 1.4 not compatible with python 3.8 Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 958476: ht

Bug#972277: sensors-applet: Install the gnome-panel module in multi-arch location

Package: sensors-applet Version: 3.0.0+git6-0.4 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source with gnome-panel 3.38 Tags: ftbfs patch pending Dear Maintainer, In gnome-panel 3.37.1, I enabled multi-arch support [1]. So the modules are now installed into multi-arch location. Today th

Processed: [bts-link] source package src:nipy

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package src:nipy > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/ > # > user debian-bts-l...@lists.debian.org Settin

Bug#972271: marked as done (cvxopt: binary-all FTBFS)

Your message dated Thu, 15 Oct 2020 17:48:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#972271: fixed in cvxopt 1.2.5+dfsg-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #972271, regarding cvxopt: binary-all FTBFS to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this i

Bug#972194: marked as done (pyside2 is not ready for python3.9)

Your message dated Thu, 15 Oct 2020 17:33:51 + with message-id and subject line Bug#972194: fixed in pyside2 5.15.0-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #972194, regarding pyside2 is not ready for python3.9 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#972185: marked as done (libre0: stack smashing detected in v1.1.0)

Your message dated Thu, 15 Oct 2020 13:19:37 -0400 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#972185: libre0: stack smashing detected in v1.1.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #972185, regarding libre0: stack smashing detected in v1.1.0 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the prob

Bug#971936: marked as done (blist ftbfs with python3-defaults (python3.9) from experimental)

Your message dated Thu, 15 Oct 2020 17:18:45 + with message-id and subject line Bug#971936: fixed in blist 1.3.6-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #971936, regarding blist ftbfs with python3-defaults (python3.9) from experimental to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the probl

Processed: [bts-link] source package mruby

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package mruby > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/ > # > user debian-bts-l...@lists.debian.org Setting u

Processed: Bug#971936 marked as pending in blist

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #971936 [src:blist] blist ftbfs with python3-defaults (python3.9) from experimental Added tag(s) pending. -- 971936: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=971936 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#971936: marked as pending in blist

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #971936 in blist reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/blist/-/commit/2c10bfaf3fb034489bdb56e6

Bug#972027: marked as done (pycxx needs a sourceful upload to support python3.9)

Your message dated Thu, 15 Oct 2020 16:49:05 + with message-id and subject line Bug#972027: fixed in pycxx 7.1.4-0.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #972027, regarding pycxx needs a sourceful upload to support python3.9 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has bee

Bug#951824: marked as done (stimfit needs a source only upload.)

Your message dated Thu, 15 Oct 2020 19:05:01 +0300 with message-id <20201015160501.GA18181@localhost> and subject line Re: Bug#951824: stimfit needs a source only upload. has caused the Debian Bug report #951824, regarding stimfit needs a source only upload. to be marked as done. This means that y

Bug#971995: marked as done (python-greenlet ftbfs with python3-defaults (python3.9) from experimental)

Your message dated Thu, 15 Oct 2020 16:04:25 + with message-id and subject line Bug#972025: fixed in python-greenlet 0.4.17-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #972025, regarding python-greenlet ftbfs with python3-defaults (python3.9) from experimental to be marked as done. This means that yo

Bug#972025: marked as done (python-greenlet ftbfs with python3.9 as supported python version)

Your message dated Thu, 15 Oct 2020 16:04:25 + with message-id and subject line Bug#972025: fixed in python-greenlet 0.4.17-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #972025, regarding python-greenlet ftbfs with python3.9 as supported python version to be marked as done. This means that you claim th

Processed: severity of 948020 is normal

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 948020 normal Bug #948020 [src:stimfit] stimfit: b-d on python3-all-dev, but not built for all supported Python3 versions Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistanc

Processed: forcibly merging 951888 972023

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forcemerge 951888 972023 Bug #951888 [src:python-enable] python-enable FTBFS with swig 4.0.1 Bug #951888 [src:python-enable] python-enable FTBFS with swig 4.0.1 Added tag(s) sid and bullseye. Bug #972023 [src:python-enable] python-enable ftbfs wit

Processed: Re: Bug#972271: cvxopt: binary-all FTBFS

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + pending Bug #972271 [src:cvxopt] cvxopt: binary-all FTBFS Added tag(s) pending. -- 972271: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=972271 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#972271: cvxopt: binary-all FTBFS

Control: tags -1 + pending On Thu, 15 Oct 2020 at 17:30, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Source: cvxopt > Version: 1.2.5+dfsg-2 > Severity: serious > Tags: ftbfs Thanks. Fixed in git. [1] https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/cvxopt/-/commit/deac8299bfd81247ee36762734fd18b944d4a5fd

Bug#970230: closed by Debian FTP Masters (reply to Timo Aaltonen ) (Bug#970230: fixed in freeipa 4.8.10-1)

Control: reopen -1 On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 10:36:05AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: >... > freeipa (4.8.10-1) unstable; urgency=medium >... >* control: Build freeipa-client-epn only where nodejs is available. > (Closes: #970230) >... Unfortunately this was not sufficient to f

Processed: Re: Bug#970230 closed by Debian FTP Masters (reply to Timo Aaltonen ) (Bug#970230: fixed in freeipa 4.8.10-1)

Processing control commands: > reopen -1 Bug #970230 {Done: Timo Aaltonen } [src:freeipa] freeipa FTBFS on non-nodejs architectures 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them. Bug reopened No longer

Bug#972272: liquidsoap FTBFS on bytecode architectures

Source: liquidsoap Version: 1.4.3-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=liquidsoap&suite=sid ... dh_missing -a dh_missing: warning: usr/lib/ocaml/liquidsoap/META exists in debian/tmp but is not installed to anywhere (related file: "src/META") dh_missin

Bug#972271: cvxopt: binary-all FTBFS

Source: cvxopt Version: 1.2.5+dfsg-2 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=cvxopt&arch=all&ver=1.2.5%2Bdfsg-2&stamp=1602771489&raw=0 ... dh_auto_test -i -O--buildsystem=pybuild I: pybuild base:217: cd /<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.9_cvxopt/build; python3.9 -m

Bug#972249: marked as done (unrardll needs a sourceful upload for python3.9)

Your message dated Thu, 15 Oct 2020 15:22:52 + with message-id and subject line Bug#972249: fixed in unrardll 0.1.4-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #972249, regarding unrardll needs a sourceful upload for python3.9 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been d

Bug#972266: marked as done (seqtools: flaky armhf autopkgtest on ci.debian.net: Error: signal 11:)

Your message dated Thu, 15 Oct 2020 14:54:32 + with message-id and subject line Bug#972266: fixed in seqtools 4.44.1+dfsg-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #972266, regarding seqtools: flaky armhf autopkgtest on ci.debian.net: Error: signal 11: to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#972267: gudhi: binary-all FTBFS

Source: gudhi Version: 3.3.0+dfsg-2 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=gudhi&ver=3.3.0%2Bdfsg-2 ... for py3ver in 3.9 3.8 ; do \ dh_auto_install --buildsystem=cmake --no-parallel --builddirectory=build-py$py3ver/userversion ; \ done cd bui

Processed: Re: elixir: cannot be installed without Erlang from unstable

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + patch Bug #939324 [elixir-lang] elixir: cannot be installed without Erlang from unstable Added tag(s) patch. > severity -1 grave Bug #939324 [elixir-lang] elixir: cannot be installed without Erlang from unstable Severity set to 'grave' from 'normal' --

Bug#961076: NXNS Attack (CVE-2020-12667)

El 14/10/20 a las 10:12, Andrew Savchenko escribió: > Dear Maintainers, > > Is there still a plan to backport a fix for CVE-2020-12667 into Buster? > > Looking at the changelog [1], there is nothing that indicates it is already > fixed. > > [1] > https://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelo

Bug#972266: seqtools: flaky armhf autopkgtest on ci.debian.net: Error: signal 11:

Source: seqtools Version: 4.44.1+dfsg-5 Severity: serious Tags: sid bullseye X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: flaky Dear maintainer(s), The autopkgtest of seqtools turned up a couple of times on our list of regressions. I looked into the history

Bug#972247: marked as done (Probes fail with error: ‘struct mm_struct’ has no member named mmap_sem)

Your message dated Thu, 15 Oct 2020 13:36:53 + with message-id and subject line Bug#972247: fixed in systemtap 4.3-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #972247, regarding Probes fail with error: ‘struct mm_struct’ has no member named mmap_sem to be marked as done. This means that you claim tha

Bug#963655: marked as done (python-apt: FTBFS with Sphinx 3.1: Invalid C declaration: Expected end of definition. [error at 10] pkgAcquire::Item)

Your message dated Thu, 15 Oct 2020 12:49:22 + with message-id and subject line Bug#963655: fixed in python-apt 2.1.4 has caused the Debian Bug report #963655, regarding python-apt: FTBFS with Sphinx 3.1: Invalid C declaration: Expected end of definition. [error at 10] pkgAcquire::Item to be

Bug#957665: Fortran issue in paw (Was: paw: ftbfs with GCC-10)

Hi Andreas, On 2020-10-15 15:26, Andreas Tille wrote: > when trying to build paw with gcc / fortran 10 there are some FORTRAN > errors: > > > ... > Error: Type mismatch between actual argument at (1) and actual argument at > (2) (COMPLEX(4)/INTEGER(4)). > /<>/src/pawlib/comis/code/cs1200.F:138:

Processed: Fortran issue in paw (Was: paw: ftbfs with GCC-10)

Processing control commands: > tags -1 help Bug #957665 [src:paw] paw: ftbfs with GCC-10 Added tag(s) help. -- 957665: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=957665 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#957665: Fortran issue in paw (Was: paw: ftbfs with GCC-10)

Control: tags -1 help Hi, when trying to build paw with gcc / fortran 10 there are some FORTRAN errors: ... Error: Type mismatch between actual argument at (1) and actual argument at (2) (COMPLEX(4)/INTEGER(4)). /<>/src/pawlib/comis/code/cs1200.F:138:24: 76 | CALL CCOPYA(KOD(IP

Bug#972261: FTBFS with OCaml 4.11.1 (-unsafe-string is not available)

Package: src:ocaml-melt Version: 1.4.0-3 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Dear Maintainer, Your package ocaml-melt FTBFS with OCaml 4.11.1 because -unsafe-string is no longer available. Cheers, -- Stéphane -- System Information: Debian Release: bullseye/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (

Bug#972262: FTBFS with OCaml 4.11.1 (-unsafe-string is not available)

Package: src:ocamlviz Version: 1.01-4 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Dear Maintainer, Your package ocamlviz FTBFS with OCaml 4.11.1 because -unsafe-string is no longer available. Cheers, -- Stéphane -- System Information: Debian Release: bullseye/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990,

Bug#972138: marked as done (flatpak: fails to run if malcontent enabled but accountsservice, policykit-1 not installed)

Your message dated Thu, 15 Oct 2020 11:03:43 + with message-id and subject line Bug#972138: fixed in flatpak 1.8.2-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #972138, regarding flatpak: fails to run if malcontent enabled but accountsservice, policykit-1 not installed to be marked as done. This means

Bug#972259: FTBFS with OCaml 4.11.1 (-unsafe-string is not available)

Package: src:galax Version: 1.1-16 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Dear Maintainer, Your package galax FTBFS with OCaml 4.11.1 because -unsafe-string is no longer available. Cheers, -- Stéphane -- System Information: Debian Release: bullseye/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testi

Bug#970764: marked as done (python3-venv: /usr/bin/pyvenv is a dangling symlink, man page, too)

Your message dated Thu, 15 Oct 2020 10:50:35 + with message-id and subject line Bug#970764: fixed in python3-defaults 3.9.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #970764, regarding python3-venv: /usr/bin/pyvenv is a dangling symlink, man page, too to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#972145: mct_manager_get_app_filter() fails closed if accountsservice not installed

On Tue, 13 Oct 2020 at 10:29:27 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > This would ideally not be a hard dependency, but the integration with > libmalcontent (parental controls) fails closed in some situations where > it should probably fail open. I've contacted upstream. I've worked around the symptom (#9

Bug#972258: FTBFS (1 file would be reformatted)

Package: src:botch Version: 0.22-4 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Dear Maintainer, Your package botch currently FTBFS in sid: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=botch The rebuild was triggered by the update of OCaml from 4.08.1 to 4.11.1, but the error looks independent (I might be

Bug#972138: marked as pending in flatpak

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #972138 in flatpak reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/flatpak/-/commit/ca496b8f3fd53a35e0643bcaf325010e41

Processed: Bug#972138 marked as pending in flatpak

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #972138 [flatpak] flatpak: fails to run if malcontent enabled but accountsservice, policykit-1 not installed Added tag(s) pending. -- 972138: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=972138 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.

Bug#957614: marked as done (nut: ftbfs with GCC-10)

Your message dated Thu, 15 Oct 2020 10:35:51 + with message-id and subject line Bug#957614: fixed in nut 2.7.4-13 has caused the Debian Bug report #957614, regarding nut: ftbfs with GCC-10 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Bug#957020: marked as done (audit: ftbfs with GCC-10)

Your message dated Thu, 15 Oct 2020 10:04:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#957020: fixed in audit 1:2.8.5-3.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #957020, regarding audit: ftbfs with GCC-10 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#972251: python-line-profile ftbfs in unstable

Package: src:python-line-profiler Version: 2.1-2 Severity: serious Tags: sid bullseye User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: python3.9 likely not python3.9 specific, but needed to build for python3.9 [...] I: pybuild base:217: /usr/bin/python3.9 setup.py build running build running build_

Bug#969494: r-cran-mice: autopkgtest regression: there is no package called ‘broom.mixed’

Control: block -1 by 969426 Besides the missing r-cran-broom.mixed there might be another issue: $ sh /usr/share/doc/r-cran-mice/run-unit-test BEGIN TEST testthat.R ... > library(testthat) > library(mice) Attaching package: ‘mice’ The following objects are masked from ‘package:base’: cbi

Processed: Re: r-cran-mice: autopkgtest regression: there is no package called ‘broom.mixed’

Processing control commands: > block -1 by 969426 Bug #969494 [src:r-cran-mice] r-cran-mice: autopkgtest regression: there is no package called ‘broom.mixed’ 969494 was not blocked by any bugs. 969494 was blocking: 970330 971235 Added blocking bug(s) of 969494: 969426 -- 969494: https://bugs.de

Bug#972250: vienna-rna needs a sourceful upload for python3.9

Package: src:vienna-rna Version: 2.4.14+dfsg-2 Severity: serious Tags: sid bullseye User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: python3.9 vienna-rna needs a sourceful upload for python3.9, packages in contrib are not built by the buildds.

Bug#972249: unrardll needs a sourceful upload for python3.9

Package: src:unrardll Version: 0.1.3-6 Severity: serious Tags: sid bullseye User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: python3.9 unrardll needs a sourceful upload for python3.9, packages in contrib are not built by the buildds.

Bug#972032: setools ftbfs with python3.9 as supported python version

can be worked around by building without -Werror. Note that this won't work with Python 3.10 anymore. Uploaded to the delayed queue.

Bug#972247: Probes fail with error: ‘struct mm_struct’ has no member named mmap_sem

Package: systemtap Version: 4.3-2 Severity: grave With linux-image-5.8.0-3-amd64 version 5.8.14-1, stap fails as follows: $ sudo stap -e 'probe oneshot { println("hello world") }' [...] /usr/share/systemtap/runtime/linux/access_process_vm.h: In function ‘__access_process_vm_’: /usr/share/systemt

Bug#972016: py-lmdb ftbfs with python3.9

now uploaded to the delayed queue

Bug#972026: python-pyo ftbfs with python3.9 as supported python version

now uploaded to the delayed queue

Bug#972009: marked as done (gudhi ftbfs with python3.9 as supported python version)

Your message dated Thu, 15 Oct 2020 08:43:18 + with message-id and subject line Bug#972009: fixed in gudhi 3.3.0+dfsg-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #972009, regarding gudhi ftbfs with python3.9 as supported python version to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem h

Bug#972246: numba ftbfs in unstable with python3.9 as supported python3 version

Package: src:numba Version: 0.51.2-1 Severity: serious Tags: sid bullseye ftbfs numba ftbfs in unstable, different failures on some architectures. See https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=numba - test suite time outs ? - packaging errors (armel, mips64el, ppc64el, ...)

Processed: Re: Bug#960769: swt4-gtk FTBFS on 32bit

Processing control commands: > severity -1 important Bug #960769 [src:swt4-gtk] swt4-gtk FTBFS on 32bit Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' -- 960769: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=960769 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#960769: swt4-gtk FTBFS on 32bit

Control: severity -1 important Hi, On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 06:30:51 +0200 Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > > The binaries for the 32-bit architectures were removed in #962915 [1], > > but only for version 4.13.0-1 in unstable. > > This was not sufficient to let it migrate to testing. > > The britney

Processed: tagging 972032

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 972032 + ftbfs Bug #972032 [src:setools] python-setools ftbfs with python3.9 as supported python version Added tag(s) ftbfs. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 972032: https://bugs.debian.org/cg

  1   2   >