I just fixed this in version control, but there's more to do, and I'm
not releasing anything into the archive.
https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/sundials/-/commit/dc8951dabd913d2cc4c259b5c5e59f90f4c60f26
Package: vde-switch,vde-wirefilter,vdeplug
Version: 2.3.2+r586-5
Severity: serious
Upgrading vde2 from 2.3.2+r586-2.2+b1 to 2.3.2+r586-5 fails for me as
follows:
Selecting previously unselected package vde-switch.
Preparing to unpack .../44-vde-switch_2.3.2+r586-5_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking vde-swit
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 964195 + upstream fixed-upstream
Bug #964195 [src:guacamole-server] CVE-2020-9497 CVE-2020-9498
Added tag(s) fixed-upstream.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
964195: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi
Source: libzorpll
Version: 7.0.1.0~alpha1-1.1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 7.0.4.0-1
Tags: sid bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: block -1 by 968274
Dear maintainer(s),
As recently announced [1], the Release Team now considers packages that
Processing control commands:
> close -1 7.0.4.0-1
Bug #971967 [src:libzorpll] src:libzorpll: fails to migrate to testing for too
long: unresolved RC bug and maintainer built arch:all binaries
Marked as fixed in versions libzorpll/7.0.4.0-1.
Bug #971967 [src:libzorpll] src:libzorpll: fails to migr
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 10, 2020 at 06:28:39PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
> I somehow missed the guacamole-server package in Debian.
Right, I reassigned earlier today then the bug to guacamole-server and
adjusted the tracking in the security-tracker. Thanks for
investigating.
> Currently I
> believe
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 971773 serious
Bug #971773 [gvmd] Needs porting to PostgreSQL 13
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
971773: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrepor
Your message dated Sat, 10 Oct 2020 17:00:11 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#971952: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #966659,
regarding libghc-monad-gen-doc: Depends on missing haddock-interface-33
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that t
Your message dated Sat, 10 Oct 2020 16:57:39 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#971803: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #971667,
regarding gnome-shell-extension-workspaces-to-dock: Not working on gnome-shell
3.38
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Sat, 10 Oct 2020 16:57:01 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#971772: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #918163,
regarding Broken in Stretch
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is n
Your message dated Sat, 10 Oct 2020 16:59:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#971848: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #953182,
regarding xul-ext-nostalgy: new version available which fixes the thunderbird
68 conflict
to be marked as done.
This means th
Your message dated Sat, 10 Oct 2020 16:51:46 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#971711: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #957646,
regarding openvas-manager: ftbfs with GCC-10
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w
Your message dated Sat, 10 Oct 2020 16:45:49 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#971661: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #933110,
regarding pkg-components: No upstream maintainer ⇒ unsuitable for Bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim tha
Your message dated Sat, 10 Oct 2020 16:40:52 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#971534: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #885188,
regarding freehdl: please migrate to guile-2.2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Sat, 10 Oct 2020 16:36:05 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#970847: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #942331,
regarding google-cloud-print-connector: FTBFS during rebuild with libsnmp35
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim th
Your message dated Sat, 10 Oct 2020 16:37:24 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#970868: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #932796,
regarding Non-DFSG license in dyndns.pl file
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w
Your message dated Sat, 10 Oct 2020 16:36:05 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#970847: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #943542,
regarding google-cloud-print-connector: hardcoded dependency on libsnmp30
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
I somehow missed the guacamole-server package in Debian. Currently I
believe it is possible to backport the patch from 1.2.0 to 0.9.9.
However there is still the problem with freerdp2 (#888321), most likely
a new upstream version for unstable/testing is required anyway.
Markkus
signature.asc
De
Your message dated Sat, 10 Oct 2020 16:23:29 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#970449: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #957498,
regarding loadmeter: ftbfs with GCC-10
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
I
Your message dated Sat, 10 Oct 2020 16:21:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#970413: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #937255,
regarding pbgenomicconsensus: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Sat, 10 Oct 2020 16:13:22 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#970290: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #957663,
regarding paris-traceroute: ftbfs with GCC-10
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 964195 src:guacamole-server
Bug #964195 [src:guacamole-client] CVE-2020-9497 CVE-2020-9498
Bug reassigned from package 'src:guacamole-client' to 'src:guacamole-server'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #964195 to the same v
Dear Maintainer,
tried to have a look at this one, found the segfault [1],
and can point to the place where the pointer gets overwritten [2].
Unfortunately Valgrind or ASAN gave me not more details.
Kind regards,
Bernhard
[1]
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x7fa54364fc1
Package: pitivi
Version: 2020.09-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 3.5
Dear Maintainer,
After the upgrade to 2020.09-1, pitivi fails to start. I tried first via
the GNOME UI, and nothing happened. Then I tried on a terminal, and got
this:
~$ pitivi
Não foi possível importar “GstTranscode
Hi,
I am currently investigating the security vulnerabilities in
guacamole-client.
I believe the reported CVE-2020-9497 and CVE-2020-9498 issues only
affect the server part of guacamole but this one has not been packaged
yet. The security researchers who reported the vulnerabilities have
discusse
Package: src:python-bleach
Version: 3.2.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bullseye
python-bleach triggers autopkg test failures on every package, as seen at
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/python-bleach
autopkgtest for loggerhead/1.19~bzr501-1: amd64: Regression ♻ (reference ♻),
arm64: Regression ♻
Processing control commands:
> close -1
Bug #971947 [calibre] calibre: crashes immediatly
Marked Bug as done
--
971947: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=971947
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: close -1
yes. seems the fault is on my side... sorry for the noise, i didnt realize the
local path.
Am 10. Oktober 2020 13:26:32 MESZ schrieb Norbert Preining
:
>Hi
>
>I don't really think that this:
>
>> RuntimeError: Failed to load the progress_indicator C extension, with
>error:
>/
On Sat, Oct 10, 2020 at 11:42:30AM +, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Hi Tobias,
>
> No problem, only one question I'm interested: how did you end up with a local
> copy of Qt? I have seen a lot of things, but that was new! :-D
Can't recall for sure, but not long a go I installed a python develope
Your message dated Sat, 10 Oct 2020 11:48:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#971205: fixed in netkit-ntalk 0.17-17
has caused the Debian Bug report #971205,
regarding netkit-ntalk: FTBFS: dh_auto_configure: error: cd
obj-x86_64-linux-gnu && cmake -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/usr
-DCMAKE_BU
Hi Tobias,
No problem, only one question I'm interested: how did you end up with a local
copy of Qt? I have seen a lot of things, but that was new! :-D
--
PREINING Norbert https://www.preining.info
Accelia Inc. + IFMGA ProGuide + TU Wien + JAIST + TeX Live + Debian D
Hi
I don't really think that this:
> RuntimeError: Failed to load the progress_indicator C extension, with error:
> /home/tobi/.local/lib/python3.8/site-packages/PyQt5/Qt/lib/libQt5Core.so.
Sounds like something of a good idea. Are you really having you local copy of
Qt???
Best
Norbert
--
P
Package: calibre
Version: 5.2.0+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
calibre crashes immediatly on start:
tobi@isildor:~$ calibre
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/calibre", line 20, in
sys.exit(calibre())
File "/usr/lib/calibre/calibre/gui_launch.py", line 73, in calibre
main(ar
Your message dated Sat, 10 Oct 2020 08:34:53 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#971919: fixed in texlive-lang 2020.20200925-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #971919,
regarding texlive-lang breaks logidee-tools autopkgtest: Command \fnum@table
undefined
to be marked as done.
This means
On 10/7/20 3:03 PM, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed this local root escalation yesterday and I'm working on a
> Stretch LTS update.
> See also https://salsa.debian.org/sympa-team/sympa/-/merge_requests/1
>
> Are there plans to update buster?
>
> Cheers!
> Sylvain
>
Hello Sylvain,
t
Source: r-cran-shinystan
Version: 2.5.0-3
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bullseye
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: regression
Hi Maintainer
Since the removal of r-cran-rstanarm from testing on 2020-07-22,
r-cran-shinystan's autopkgtests have been fa
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 971919 https://tug.org/pipermail/tex-live/2020-October/046197.html
Bug #971919 [src:texlive-lang, src:logidee-tools] texlive-lang breaks
logidee-tools autopkgtest: Command \fnum@table undefined
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://
forwarded 971919 https://tug.org/pipermail/tex-live/2020-October/046197.html
thanks
Hi Paul,
On Fri, 09 Oct 2020, Paul Gevers wrote:
> With a recent upload of texlive-lang the autopkgtest of logidee-tools
> fails in testing when that autopkgtest is run with the binary packages
Yes, I am aware o
38 matches
Mail list logo
