Bug#969448: bind9: dies with assertion and does not restart

2020-09-02 Thread Francesco Potortì
Package: bind9 Version: 1:9.16.6-2 Severity: critical X-Debbugs-Cc: none, Francesco Potortì This happened twice in the last days. Here are the logs Cycle 1/2 Aug 31 16:46:29 tucano named[786855]: starting BIND 9.16.6-Debian (Stable Release) Aug 31 16:46:29 tu

Bug#958606: marked as done (bitlbee: Build-Depends on deprecated dh-systemd which is going away)

2020-09-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 03 Sep 2020 05:33:26 + with message-id and subject line Bug#958606: fixed in bitlbee 3.6-1.2 has caused the Debian Bug report #958606, regarding bitlbee: Build-Depends on deprecated dh-systemd which is going away to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#967185: Migration blocked

2020-09-02 Thread Chris Knadle
Migration of openjfx 11.0.7+0-3 is blocked because it introduces a new FTBFS bug https://bugs.debian.org/969260 Noting this in this bug so that others can find it -- Chris -- Chris Knadle chris.kna...@coredump.us

Bug#968339: Accept

2020-09-02 Thread Vasyl Gello
Dear colleagues, I had to track this issue by building Kodi 18.8 with address sanitizer (asan) and it appears that the root cause is very likely a data race introduced by libsrt_gnutls.so.1, which in turn became an ffmpeg dependency since 4.3.0: (gdb) bt

Bug#957860: marked as done (tcpick: ftbfs with GCC-10)

2020-09-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 02 Sep 2020 22:33:37 + with message-id and subject line Bug#957860: fixed in tcpick 0.2.1-9 has caused the Debian Bug report #957860, regarding tcpick: ftbfs with GCC-10 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is no

Bug#957860: marked as pending in tcpick

2020-09-02 Thread Marcos Fouces
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #957860 in tcpick reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-security-team/tcpick/-/commit/41751739f4adefaad1d7757ae

Processed: Bug#957860 marked as pending in tcpick

2020-09-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #957860 [src:tcpick] tcpick: ftbfs with GCC-10 Added tag(s) pending. -- 957860: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=957860 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#969436: [Pkg-net-snmp-devel] Bug#969436: libsnmp-dev: missing Breaks+Replaces: libsnmp-perl (<< 5.9)

2020-09-02 Thread Craig Small
On Thu, 3 Sep 2020 at 06:45, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > dpkg: error processing archive > /var/cache/apt/archives/libsnmp-dev_5.9+dfsg-1_amd64.deb (--unpack): >trying to overwrite '/usr/share/man/man3/SNMP.3pm.gz', which is also in > package libsnmp-perl 5.8+dfsg-5 It should be in the libsn

Bug#964604: marked as done (binutils-djgpp: FTBFS: patching fails)

2020-09-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 02 Sep 2020 20:48:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#964604: fixed in binutils-djgpp 2.34+dfsg-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #964604, regarding binutils-djgpp: FTBFS: patching fails to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been d

Bug#969436: libsnmp-dev: missing Breaks+Replaces: libsnmp-perl (<< 5.9)

2020-09-02 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: libsnmp-dev Version: 5.9+dfsg-1 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from 'testing'. It installed fine in 'testing', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails because it tries to overwrite othe

Bug#969430: marked as done (Ledger executable not found)

2020-09-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 02 Sep 2020 20:34:03 + with message-id and subject line Bug#969430: fixed in ledger 3.2.1-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #969430, regarding Ledger executable not found to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#966855: marked as done (hexcurse: FTBFS: ld: llist.o:./src/../include/hex.h:129: multiple definition of `fpOUT'; file.o:./src/../include/hex.h:129: first defined here)

2020-09-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 02 Sep 2020 19:48:34 + with message-id and subject line Bug#966855: fixed in hexcurse 1.58-1.3 has caused the Debian Bug report #966855, regarding hexcurse: FTBFS: ld: llist.o:./src/../include/hex.h:129: multiple definition of `fpOUT'; file.o:./src/../include/hex.h:129

Bug#968946: marked as done (coccinelle: FTBFS in sid)

2020-09-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 02 Sep 2020 19:18:27 + with message-id and subject line Bug#968946: fixed in coccinelle 1.0.8.deb-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #968946, regarding coccinelle: FTBFS in sid to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If thi

Processed: tagging 932578

2020-09-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 932578 + bullseye sid Bug #932578 {Done: Maximiliano Curia } [cinnamon] Cinnamon Settings fail to start Added tag(s) sid and bullseye. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 932578: https://bugs.deb

Bug#969430: Ledger executable not found

2020-09-02 Thread Louis-Philippe Véronneau
Package: ledger Version: 3.2.1-5 Severity: grave Dear maintainers, It seems version 3.2.1-5 broke ledger badly. When calling `ledger`, I now get: bash: ledger: command not found Calling `whereis ledger`, I get: ledger: /usr/lib/ledger This directory is empty. Cheers, and thanks for

Bug#969212: marked as done (libcmark-gfm-extensions-dev: cmark-gfm-core-extensions.h depends on missing config.h)

2020-09-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 02 Sep 2020 17:48:46 + with message-id and subject line Bug#969212: fixed in cmark-gfm 0.29.0.gfm.0-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #969212, regarding libcmark-gfm-extensions-dev: cmark-gfm-core-extensions.h depends on missing config.h to be marked as done. This me

Bug#966898: marked as done (binutils-avr: FTBFS: elf.c:706:35: error: overflow in conversion from ‘unsigned int’ to ‘int’ changes value from ‘num_group = 4294967295’ to ‘-1’ [-Werror=overflow])

2020-09-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 02 Sep 2020 17:33:35 + with message-id and subject line Bug#966898: fixed in binutils-avr 2.26.20160125+Atmel3.6.2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #966898, regarding binutils-avr: FTBFS: elf.c:706:35: error: overflow in conversion from ‘unsigned int’ to ‘int’ change

Bug#936336: marked as done (coz-profiler: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye)

2020-09-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 02 Sep 2020 17:18:43 + with message-id and subject line Bug#936336: fixed in coz-profiler 0.2.2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #936336, regarding coz-profiler: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#966728: marked as done (coz-profiler: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye)

2020-09-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 02 Sep 2020 17:18:43 + with message-id and subject line Bug#936336: fixed in coz-profiler 0.2.2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #936336, regarding coz-profiler: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the probl

Bug#936336: coz-profiler: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

2020-09-02 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Lluís Vilanova] > I've pushed a new version for coz, please check > https://salsa.debian.org/coz-team/coz-profiler. Very good. Thank you for looking after this. I had a look, and uploaded a new version of libelfin and coz-profiler to unstable. I have updated the changelog and added tags, will

Bug#957812: slirp: ftbfs with GCC-10

2020-09-02 Thread Bernhard Übelacker
Dear Maintainer, the patch "949003_explicit_extern_declaration.patch" attached in [1], should help against the exact issue this bug is about. Kind regards, Bernhard [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=949003#35

Bug#936336: coz-profiler: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

2020-09-02 Thread Lluís Vilanova
On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 3:27 PM Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > I've managed to fix my key problems, and can do the upload. > > Is it ready to go in? I've pushed a new version for coz, please check https://salsa.debian.org/coz-team/coz-profiler. Cheers, Lluis

Bug#859926: speechd-up: fails to install

2020-09-02 Thread Dennis Filder
I looked into this a bit and came up with the attached patch (written against 0.10.1-2), but for further improvement I'd need some feedback. The patch adds a new thread that is on the lookout for Pulseaudio processes and reconfigures/restarts the output modules accordingly once it finds one. This

Processed (with 2 errors): your mail

2020-09-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 958000 fixed-upstream Bug #958000 [src:xserver-xorg-video-openchrome] xserver-xorg-video-openchrome: ftbfs with GCC-10 Added tag(s) fixed-upstream. > forwarded 958000 Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > https://cgit.freedesk

Bug#967011: marked as done ([i386] **CRASHING**:seccomp-bpf failure in syscall 0403)

2020-09-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 02 Sep 2020 15:22:31 + with message-id and subject line Bug#967011: fixed in qtwebengine-opensource-src 5.14.2+dfsg1-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #967011, regarding [i386] **CRASHING**:seccomp-bpf failure in syscall 0403 to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#969360: marked as done (kmail freezes when selecting a read mail to show)

2020-09-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 02 Sep 2020 15:22:31 + with message-id and subject line Bug#967011: fixed in qtwebengine-opensource-src 5.14.2+dfsg1-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #967011, regarding kmail freezes when selecting a read mail to show to be marked as done. This means that you claim t

Bug#964569: Removed autopkgtest

2020-09-02 Thread Thomas Goirand
Hi, The autopkgtest were flaky, and not added by me (as part of a contribution) so I removed them. Hopefully, I'll be able to re-add them later on, and/or add tests at build time. Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo)

Processed: py2removal bugs severity updates - 2020-09-02 14:33:49.280902+00:00

2020-09-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # This is an automated script, part of the effort for the removal of Python 2 > from bullseye > # * https://wiki.debian.org/Python/2Removal > # * http://sandrotosi.me/debian/py2removal/index.html > # See https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-an

Processed: Bug#966921 marked as pending in dpdk

2020-09-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #966921 [libdpdk-dev] path in libdpdk.pc must be versioned with tooling version Added tag(s) pending. -- 966921: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=966921 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#966921: marked as pending in dpdk

2020-09-02 Thread Luca Boccassi
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #966921 in dpdk reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/dpdk/-/commit/022e31bef7a52681fe735aa42f427f2832649d80

Processed: tagging 969064

2020-09-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 969064 + bullseye sid Bug #969064 {Done: Stefan Fritsch } [src:apr-util] apr-util: Cannot fulfill the build dependencies Added tag(s) sid and bullseye. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 969064:

Processed: tagging 969065

2020-09-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 969065 + bullseye sid Bug #969065 {Done: Stefan Fritsch } [src:apr] apr: Cannot fulfill the build dependencies Added tag(s) bullseye and sid. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 969065: https://b

Bug#968947: marked as done (qemu: CVE-2020-14364: usb: out-of-bounds r/w access issue)

2020-09-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 02 Sep 2020 13:33:46 + with message-id and subject line Bug#968947: fixed in qemu 1:5.1+dfsg-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #968947, regarding qemu: CVE-2020-14364: usb: out-of-bounds r/w access issue to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#967011: marked as pending in qtwebengine-opensource-src

2020-09-02 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #967011 in qtwebengine-opensource-src reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/qt-kde-team/qt/qtwebengine/-/commit/f58

Processed: Bug#967011 marked as pending in qtwebengine-opensource-src

2020-09-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #967011 [libqt5webengine5] [i386] **CRASHING**:seccomp-bpf failure in syscall 0403 Bug #969360 [libqt5webengine5] kmail freezes when selecting a read mail to show Added tag(s) pending. Added tag(s) pending. -- 967011: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi

Bug#949750: closing 949750

2020-09-02 Thread Edward Betts
close 949750 0.6.3-2 thanks

Processed: closing 949750

2020-09-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > close 949750 0.6.3-2 Bug #949750 [src:geoalchemy2] geoalchemy2: Cannot fulfill the build dependencies Marked as fixed in versions geoalchemy2/0.6.3-2. Bug #949750 [src:geoalchemy2] geoalchemy2: Cannot fulfill the build dependencies Marked Bug as d

Bug#963398: marked as done (python-murano-pkg-check: FTBFS with mock 4.x)

2020-09-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 02 Sep 2020 12:34:38 + with message-id and subject line Bug#963398: fixed in python-murano-pkg-check 0.3.0-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #963398, regarding python-murano-pkg-check: FTBFS with mock 4.x to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the proble

Processed: Bug#963398 marked as pending in python-murano-pkg-check

2020-09-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #963398 [src:python-murano-pkg-check] python-murano-pkg-check: FTBFS with mock 4.x Added tag(s) pending. -- 963398: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=963398 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#963398: marked as pending in python-murano-pkg-check

2020-09-02 Thread Thomas Goirand
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #963398 in python-murano-pkg-check reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/openstack-team/libs/python-murano-pkg-chec

Processed: closing 964353

2020-09-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > close 964353 0.7.10-1 Bug #964353 [src:libpappsomspp] libpappsomspp FTBFS: Boost not yet found Marked as fixed in versions libpappsomspp/0.7.10-1. Bug #964353 [src:libpappsomspp] libpappsomspp FTBFS: Boost not yet found Marked Bug as done > thanks

Bug#969360: Qt seccomp failure fixed upstream

2020-09-02 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
Hi John! On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 08:44:33PM -0400, John Scott wrote: > Control: forwarded -1 https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-81313 > Control: tags -1 upstream fixed-upstream But that bug (QTBUG-81313) is already fixed in Qt 5.14.2. So we are probably seeing something else. My guess is that

Bug#963656: marked as done (python-dogpile.cache: FTBFS with Sphinx 3.1: AttributeError: 'tuple' object has no attribute 'docname')

2020-09-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 2 Sep 2020 13:38:30 +0200 with message-id <266b2224-80ba-842b-9b49-7083ca271...@debian.org> and subject line Rebuilds fine has caused the Debian Bug report #963656, regarding python-dogpile.cache: FTBFS with Sphinx 3.1: AttributeError: 'tuple' object has no attribute 'docna

Bug#966851: intel-graphics-compiler: FTBFS: igax.hpp:501:30: error: argument to ‘alloca’ may be too large [-Werror=alloca-larger-than=]

2020-09-02 Thread Jacek Danecki
This issue was fixed with newer IGC: https://github.com/intel/intel-graphics-compiler/commit/a58dd6de4c29595a0f93cff167b487d777e4559e and is in IGC release 1.0.3826 -- jacek

Processed: fixed 963347 in 1.17.2-1

2020-09-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > fixed 963347 1.17.2-1 Bug #963347 [src:gst-plugins-ugly1.0] gst-plugins-ugly1.0: FTBFS: Can't locate Regexp/Assemble.pm in @INC Marked as fixed in versions gst-plugins-ugly1.0/1.17.2-1. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you

Processed: retitle 966921 path in libdpdk.pc must be versioned with tooling version

2020-09-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 966921 path in libdpdk.pc must be versioned with tooling version Bug #966921 [libdpdk-dev] openvswitch: FTBFS: configure: error: Could not find DPDK library in default search path, Use --with-dpdk to specify the DPDK library installed in

Processed: affects 963347, reassign 963347 to src:gst-plugins-ugly1.0

2020-09-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > affects 963347 = Bug #963347 [src:cdbs] gst-plugins-ugly1.0: FTBFS: Can't locate Regexp/Assemble.pm in @INC Removed indication that 963347 affects src:gst-plugins-ugly1.0 > reassign 963347 src:gst-plugins-ugly1.0 1.16.2-2 Bug #963347 [src:cdbs] g

Bug#966898: binutils-avr: FTBFS: elf.c:706:35: error: overflow in conversion from ‘unsigned int’ to ‘int’ changes value from ‘num_group = 4294967295’ to ‘-1’ [-Werror=overflow]

2020-09-02 Thread Hakan Ardo
Thanx for the investigation! I'll update the package. Yes something has to be done about what upstream distribution we use. Unfortunately there are atmel specific patches that people rely on that was not accepted upstream, so switching is not as straight forward as it might seem... On Mon, Aug 31

Bug#968739: marked as done (igv will not run)

2020-09-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 02 Sep 2020 07:03:39 + with message-id and subject line Bug#968739: fixed in igv 2.6.3+dfsg-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #968739, regarding igv will not run to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the c