Your message dated Fri, 07 Aug 2020 06:18:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#967154: fixed in kross-interpreters 4:20.04.3-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #967154,
regarding kross-interpreters: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you clai
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 968013 Jan Wielemaker
Bug #968013 [swi-prolog] swi-prolog: time bomb in swi-prolog-test, and failing
autopkgtest
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'Jan Wielemaker '.
> tag 968013 confirmed upstream
Bug #968013 [swi-prolog] swi-prolog: ti
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 967154 + pending
Bug #967154 [src:kross-interpreters] kross-interpreters: Unversioned Python
removal in sid/bullseye
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
967154: https://bugs
Here's a patch to fix the issue:
diff --git a/src/libmawk/vio_fifo.h b/src/libmawk/vio_fifo.h
index f170c22..a2d751d 100644
--- a/src/libmawk/vio_fifo.h
+++ b/src/libmawk/vio_fifo.h
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ typedef struct mawk_vio_fifo_s {
int eof_from_app; /* 1 if there won't be more from
Your message dated Fri, 07 Aug 2020 05:33:27 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#968030: fixed in e17 0.24.2-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #968030,
regarding e17: FTBFS during combined arch+indep build
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit
On Fri, Aug 07, 2020 at 01:17:29AM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> e17/experimental FTBFS during a combined binary arch+indep build (i.e. the
> default dpkg-buildpackage mode), while it succeeds during separate arch and
> indep builds (dpkg-buildpackage -B, dpkg-buildpackage -A; as done by the
> b
Your message dated Fri, 07 Aug 2020 04:49:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#957710: fixed in proxychains 3.1-9
has caused the Debian Bug report #957710,
regarding proxychains: ftbfs with GCC-10
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If th
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> owner 957122 woodrow.s...@gmail.com
Bug #957122 [src:davfs2] davfs2: ftbfs with GCC-10
Owner recorded as woodrow.s...@gmail.com.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
957122: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-
Your message dated Fri, 07 Aug 2020 03:04:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#957347: fixed in hydra 9.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #957347,
regarding hydra: ftbfs with GCC-10
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not th
Control: tags -1 + patch
Hi,
the attached patch fixes the FTBFS with GCC 10.
Regards,
--
Luis Paulo (lpfll)
diff -Nru ifplugd-0.28/debian/patches/09_fix-ftbfs-with-gcc10.patch ifplugd-0.28/debian/patches/09_fix-ftbfs-with-gcc10.patch
--- ifplugd-0.28/debian/patches/09_fix-ftbfs-with-gcc10.patch
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + patch
Bug #957355 [src:ifplugd] ifplugd: ftbfs with GCC-10
Added tag(s) patch.
--
957355: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=957355
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Your message dated Thu, 06 Aug 2020 23:18:30 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#963871: fixed in emacs-websocket 1.12+18.g5aaf9d1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #963871,
regarding emacs-websocket: FTBFS without external DNS
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the prob
Source: e17
Version: 0.24.2-3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Hi,
e17/experimental FTBFS during a combined binary arch+indep build (i.e. the
default dpkg-buildpackage mode), while it succeeds during separate arch and
ind
Your message dated Thu, 06 Aug 2020 23:19:29 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#966500: fixed in notcurses 1.6.11+dfsg.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #966500,
regarding python3-notcurses: missing Breaks+Replaces: notcurses-bin (<< 1.6)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Hi,
I wanted to request approval from the maintainer team to upload the
acmetool 0.2.1-2 package currently in testing/unstable to buster-
backports.
The version currently in buster (0.0.63) only supports the deprecated
ACME v1 protocol, which no longer works for new registrations, and will
stop w
Your message dated Thu, 06 Aug 2020 22:33:39 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#964541: fixed in flatpak 1.8.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #964541,
regarding flatpak: Wrong argument order for clone syscall seccomp filter on
s390x
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim tha
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #964541 [flatpak] flatpak: Wrong argument order for clone syscall seccomp
filter on s390x
Added tag(s) pending.
--
964541: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=964541
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with pro
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #964541 in flatpak reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/flatpak/-/commit/e8239c622541273adf3a3b7f24e8f23220
Control: tags 957841 + patch
Control: tags 957841 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for squidguard (versioned as 1.6.0-1.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should cancel it.
--
Regards
Sudip
diff -Nru squidguard-1.6.0/debian/changelog squidguard-1.6.
Processing control commands:
> tags 957841 + patch
Bug #957841 [src:squidguard] squidguard: ftbfs with GCC-10
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 957841 + pending
Bug #957841 [src:squidguard] squidguard: ftbfs with GCC-10
Added tag(s) pending.
--
957841: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=
Your message dated Thu, 06 Aug 2020 21:18:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#885265: fixed in chirp 1:20200227+py3+20200213-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #885265,
regarding chirp: Depends on unmaintained pygtk
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has be
Your message dated Thu, 06 Aug 2020 21:18:27 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#957034: fixed in bandwidthd 2.0.1+cvs20090917-12
has caused the Debian Bug report #957034,
regarding bandwidthd: ftbfs with GCC-10
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been deal
Your message dated Thu, 06 Aug 2020 21:18:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#936299: fixed in chirp 1:20200227+py3+20200213-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #936299,
regarding chirp: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Re: Arturo Borrero Gonzalez
> I tested chirp from the upstream mercurial repository (py3 branch) today in
> Debian testing bullseye, and I got it working with python3 with the attached
> patch.
Hi Arturo,
thanks for picking this up. I had done some python3 hacking on chirp
earlier this year, but
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #936299 [src:chirp] chirp: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #936299 to the same tags previously set
--
936299: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=936299
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #885265 in chirp reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/debian-hamradio-team/chirp/-/commit/2615a86f332fd119e52ee2e8
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #936299 in chirp reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/debian-hamradio-team/chirp/-/commit/2615a86f332fd119e52ee2e8
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #885265 [src:chirp] chirp: Depends on unmaintained pygtk
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #885265 to the same tags previously set
--
885265: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=885265
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bu
Source: dino-im
Version: 0.1.0+20200623.717d0b7-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
dino-im/experimental FTBFS on all architectures:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=dino-im&suite=experimental
dh_auto_buil
Your message dated Thu, 06 Aug 2020 20:25:57 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#957698: fixed in pommed 1.39~dfsg-5.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #957698,
regarding pommed: ftbfs with GCC-10
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Source: netpbm-free
Version: 2:10.78.05-0.1
Severity: serious
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: py2unversioned
Python2 becomes end-of-live upstream, and Debian aims to remove
Python2 from the distribution, as discussed in
https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2019/07/msg00080.html
W
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 967173 + experimental
Bug #967173 [src:mediaelement] mediaelement: Unversioned Python removal in
sid/bullseye
Added tag(s) experimental.
> tags 968019 =
Bug #968019 [src:enhanceio] enhanceio: Unversioned Python removal in
sid/bullseye
Remov
While researching this I only found packages that list the old group email:
Maintainer: Python Applications Packaging Team
-
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/applications/nitrotool/-/blob/master/debian/control
-
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/applications/terminator/-/blob/debian/mast
Source: munin
Version: 2.999.14-1
Severity: serious
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: py2unversioned
Python2 becomes end-of-live upstream, and Debian aims to remove
Python2 from the distribution, as discussed in
https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2019/07/msg00080.html
We will kee
Source: sequitur-g2p
Version: 0+r1668.r3-1
Severity: serious
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: py2unversioned
Python2 becomes end-of-live upstream, and Debian aims to remove
Python2 from the distribution, as discussed in
https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2019/07/msg00080.html
We
Source: enhanceio
Version: 0+git20190417.5815670-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bullseye
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: py2unversioned
Python2 becomes end-of-live upstream, and Debian aims to remove
Python2 from the distribution, as discussed in
https://lists.debian.org/debian-pytho
Your message dated Thu, 06 Aug 2020 19:34:06 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#957995: fixed in xscorch 0.2.1-1+nmu4
has caused the Debian Bug report #957995,
regarding xscorch: ftbfs with GCC-10
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If thi
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 serious
Bug #943302 [src:zsnapd] zsnapd: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
--
943302: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=943302
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Le 06/08/2020 à 20:51, Xavier a écrit :
> Control: reassign -1 node-typescript-types
>
> FTBFS is due to @types/node which was upgraded to version 14.0.14 while
> we run nodejs 12
It's time to move @types/node from src:typescript-types to src:nodejs
Your message dated Thu, 06 Aug 2020 19:19:58 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#957645: fixed in oroborus 2.0.20+nmu1
has caused the Debian Bug report #957645,
regarding oroborus: ftbfs with GCC-10
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If th
Your message dated Thu, 6 Aug 2020 15:13:22 -0400
with message-id <20200806191322.gf13...@connexer.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#966702: mongo-cxx-driver: maintainer address bounces
has caused the Debian Bug report #966702,
regarding mongo-cxx-driver: maintainer address bounces
to be marked as done
Control: tag -1 pending
Good day,
This night's build of insighttoolkit 4.13.3 in the clean chroot
went through, and test suite validated without particular
issues. I pushed the part of my work fixing #957360 on Salsa:
https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/insighttoolkit
As is, it may not b
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #957360 [src:insighttoolkit4] insighttoolkit4: ftbfs with GCC-10
Added tag(s) pending.
--
957360: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=957360
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Your message dated Thu, 06 Aug 2020 19:03:55 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#957820: fixed in snap 2013-11-29-10
has caused the Debian Bug report #957820,
regarding snap: ftbfs with GCC-10
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Control: reassign -1 node-typescript-types
FTBFS is due to @types/node which was upgraded to version 14.0.14 while
we run nodejs 12
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 node-typescript-types
Bug #964637 [src:node-rollup] node-rollup: FTBFS: dh_auto_build: error: cd ./.
&& sh -ex debian/nodejs/./build returned exit code 1
Bug reassigned from package 'src:node-rollup' to 'node-typescript-types'.
No longer marked as found
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> affects 964637 rollup
Bug #964637 [src:node-rollup] node-rollup: FTBFS: dh_auto_build: error: cd ./.
&& sh -ex debian/nodejs/./build returned exit code 1
Added indication that 964637 affects rollup
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please conta
Your message dated Thu, 06 Aug 2020 18:18:30 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#957798: fixed in silversearcher-ag 2.2.0+git20200805-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #957798,
regarding silversearcher-ag: ftbfs with GCC-10
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
With this build:
https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-yarnpkg/-/jobs/915568#L2420
I get a different error while building:
[17:58:12] Starting 'build'...
2420[17:58:13] Error: [BABEL]
/builds/js-team/node-yarnpkg/debian/output/node-yarnpkg-1.22.4/src/api.js:
Cannot find module 'babel-plugin-tran
Your message dated Thu, 06 Aug 2020 17:35:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#967054: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #899676,
regarding python-omniorb: Invalid maintainer address
pkg-corba-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Thu, 06 Aug 2020 17:35:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#967054: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #937970,
regarding python-omniorb: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Thu, 06 Aug 2020 17:33:22 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#966802: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #937959,
regarding python-ntlm: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pro
Your message dated Thu, 06 Aug 2020 17:33:22 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#966802: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #937959,
regarding python-ntlm: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has be
Your message dated Thu, 06 Aug 2020 17:31:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#966658: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #956975,
regarding acfax: ftbfs with GCC-10
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If th
Your message dated Thu, 06 Aug 2020 17:21:14 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#966474: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #949478,
regarding browser-plugin-freshplayer-pepperflash might be useless now
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Hi there!
I tested chirp from the upstream mercurial repository (py3 branch) today in
Debian testing bullseye, and I got it working with python3 with the attached
patch.
I was able to download the image from a baofeng UV-5RA, modify it and the upload
it again.
Please, consider merging the attac
Your message dated Thu, 06 Aug 2020 17:21:14 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#966474: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #947288,
regarding freshplayerplugin: FTBFS: No package 'libdrm' found
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Thu, 06 Aug 2020 17:19:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#966453: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #967956,
regarding golang-github-unknwon-cae: CVE-2020-7668
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been d
Your message dated Thu, 06 Aug 2020 17:19:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#966453: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #967955,
regarding golang-github-unknwon-cae: CVE-2020-7664
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been d
Package: swi-prolog
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-Cc: jcris...@debian.org
Hi,
swi-prolog autopkgtests are currently failing:
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/s/swi-prolog/6535300/log.gz
>From what I can tell, there's a step in the build process to generate
test certs, which are
I think this is solely through the build dependency on libglade2-dev
so this will be solved by xscreensaver getting rid of this dependency
(bug #967892) or by libglade2 getting rid of its python dependency
(bug #895517):
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=895517#14
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #957587 [src:ncrack] ncrack: ftbfs with GCC-10
Added tag(s) pending.
--
957587: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=957587
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #957587 in ncrack reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-security-team/ncrack/-/commit/bb895ff9194ceaf3a9054fbd2
Your message dated Thu, 06 Aug 2020 16:23:45 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#966418: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #967121,
regarding bitz-server: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pro
Your message dated Thu, 06 Aug 2020 16:23:45 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#966418: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #957043,
regarding bitz-server: ftbfs with GCC-10
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Your message dated Thu, 06 Aug 2020 16:16:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#966326: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #967178,
regarding mrtrix: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 966853 + fixed-upstream
Bug #966853 [src:gophernicus] gophernicus: FTBFS: ld:
file.o:/usr/include/tcpd.h:115: multiple definition of `deny_severity';
gophernicus.o:/usr/include/tcpd.h:115: first defined here
Added tag(s) fixed-upstream.
> t
Your message dated Thu, 06 Aug 2020 16:04:25 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#966870: fixed in nsis 3.05-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #966870,
regarding nsis: FTBFS: ld:
build/urelease/halibut/bk_xhtml.o:./Docs/src/bin/halibut/halibut.h:272:
multiple definition of `version';
bui
Your message dated Thu, 06 Aug 2020 15:50:16 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#963291: fixed in nss-pem 1.0.6-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #963291,
regarding nss-pem: FTBFS: pfind.c:279:10: error: ‘CKO_NETSCAPE_TRUST’
undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘CKO_NSS_T
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 966171 + fixed-upstream
Bug #966171 [src:ydpdict] ydpdict: FTBFS with GCC 10: multiple definition of
... due to -fno-common
Added tag(s) fixed-upstream.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
966171
Hi Christoph,
On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 12:27 PM Christoph Egger wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> > We are now looking for a new debian sponsor to upload our latest
> > version to the debian repository.
>
> I guess I can help there for now but better don't rely on me for long-term
> sponsoring. What exactly would
On Thu, Aug 06, 2020 at 11:42AM, peter green wrote:
> hi, highlighting-kate was just removed from testing at your request, but
> carettah still build-depends on it in both testing and
> unstable.
>
> Should I go ahead and file a rc bug against carettah
Good catch. I open an RC bug against caretta
Your message dated Thu, 06 Aug 2020 22:48:53 +0800
with message-id <51821f06f2134c07a730dfc53328c...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#964150 petsc: autopkgtest regression: mpiexec was
unable to launch the specified application
has caused the Debian Bug report #964150,
regarding petsc: autopkgt
Package: carettah
Version: 0.5.1-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
This package appears to be unmaintained (last upstream upload in 2016).
It depends on deprecated software (gtk2 #967282 and highlighting-kate
#963737), is not part of Stackage and has no rev dependencies.
U
Your message dated Thu, 06 Aug 2020 14:48:59 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#957463: fixed in libosmo-sccp 0.10.0-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #957463,
regarding libosmo-sccp: ftbfs with GCC-10
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Your message dated Thu, 06 Aug 2020 14:40:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#957818: fixed in smstools 3.1.21-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #957818,
regarding smstools: ftbfs with GCC-10
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Fedora has a patch for gcc-10
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/cdrkit/blob/master/f/cdrkit-1.1.11-gcc10.patch
On Thu, 6 Aug 2020, Andreas Tille wrote:
> [ERROR]
> /build/jimfs-1.1/jimfs/src/main/java/com/google/common/jimfs/PathService.java:[290,30]
> error: is not abstract and
> does not override abstract method test(Object) in Predicate
Change apply to test in line 292 (or let the IDE convert it to
Your message dated Thu, 06 Aug 2020 13:22:18 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#966938: fixed in ruby-devise 4.7.1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #966938,
regarding ruby-devise: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: ruby-bson-ext
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Thu, 06 Aug 2020 13:03:29 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#967965: fixed in astropy 4.0.1+post1-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #967965,
regarding astropy: FTBFS with scipy 1.5: [doctest]
astropy.stats.funcs.binom_conf_interval failed
to be marked as done.
This me
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notfound 967991 2.35-1
Bug #967991 [glirc] glirc, build-depends on package which is not in testing
No longer marked as found in versions glirc/2.35-1.
> found 967991 2.32-1
Bug #967991 [glirc] glirc, build-depends on package which is not in testin
notfound 967991 2.35-1
found 967991 2.32-1
close 967991 2.35-1
thanks
On 06/08/2020 13:20, Clint Adams wrote:
On Thu, Aug 06, 2020 at 11:20:00AM +0100, peter green wrote:
glirc can no longer be built in testing because haskell-regex-tdfa is no longer
present in testing. Ilias Tsitsimpis has fil
Hi!
I used this frequently enough to be hesitant to let apt dist-upgrade
remove it on my system currently.
But I understand it may not make sense to port it as its hard and
upstream is not active anymore.
Is there an alternative in Debian repository?
Best,
--
Martin
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #966938 [src:ruby-devise] ruby-devise: FTBFS: build-dependency not
installable: ruby-bson-ext
Added tag(s) pending.
--
966938: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=966938
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #966938 in ruby-devise reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-devise/-/commit/676e61cc919d115ec884476
Your message dated Thu, 06 Aug 2020 12:48:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#957032: fixed in ayatana-indicator-printers 0.1.10-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #957032,
regarding ayatana-indicator-printers: ftbfs with GCC-10
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #967965 [src:astropy] astropy: FTBFS with scipy 1.5: [doctest]
astropy.stats.funcs.binom_conf_interval failed
Added tag(s) pending.
--
967965: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=967965
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #967965 in astropy reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/debian-astro-team/astropy/-/commit/d4c28b296760a332d2236b8
Your message dated Thu, 06 Aug 2020 12:35:14 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#957555: fixed in mocassin 2.02.73-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #957555,
regarding mocassin: ftbfs with GCC-10
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Please test it.
diff -Nru isc-dhcp-4.4.1/debian/changelog isc-dhcp-4.4.1/debian/changelog
--- isc-dhcp-4.4.1/debian/changelog 2020-01-22 18:35:14.0 -0300
+++ isc-dhcp-4.4.1/debian/changelog 2020-08-05 23:08:47.0 -0300
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+isc-dhcp (4.4.1-2.2) unstable; urgency=medium
+
Package: ruby-data-migrate
Version: 5.3.1-1
Severity: serious
User: pkg-ruby-extras-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: rails6-transition
Hi,
This package's autopkgtest and rebuilds failed with rails 6. There is
new upstream version which fixes this issue.
Relevant errors,
┌──
On Thu, Aug 06, 2020 at 11:20:00AM +0100, peter green wrote:
> glirc can no longer be built in testing because haskell-regex-tdfa is no
> longer
> present in testing. Ilias Tsitsimpis has filed a bug report against the
> package
> saying he intends to remove it and asked the release team to remov
hey Lukas,
On Thu, Aug 06, 2020 at 02:03:00PM +0200, Lukas Puehringer wrote:
> FYI: https://github.com/secure-systems-lab/securesystemslib/pull/264 fixes the
> issue upstream.
nice. once it's released we should get this new version into unstable!
--
cheers,
Holger
FYI: https://github.com/secure-systems-lab/securesystemslib/pull/264 fixes the
issue upstream.
On 04.08.2020 3:11 PM, Lukas Puehringer wrote:
> Thanks for the report!
>
> It looks like a recent update to pyca/cryptography v3.0 causes our test code
> (only) to break. I just filed an issue upstream
Source: rdiff-backup
Version: 2.0.5-1
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-Cc: o...@debian.org
The maintainer address is invalid, see below.
Ansgar
Forwarded Message
> This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
>
> A message that you sent could not be delivered t
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + upstream
Bug #964541 [flatpak] flatpak: Wrong argument order for clone syscall seccomp
filter on s390x
Added tag(s) upstream.
> clone -1 -2 -3
Bug #964541 [flatpak] flatpak: Wrong argument order for clone syscall seccomp
filter on s390x
Bug 964541 cloned
Control: tags -1 + upstream
Control: clone -1 -2 -3
Control: unblock 964150 by -2
Control: unblock 964150 by -3
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak/pull/3777
Control: severity -2 normal
Control: reassign -2 src:webkit2gtk 2.28.4-1
Control: retitle -2 webkit2gtk: Wrong argument
Ilias Tsitsimpis wrote:
We should make sure that anyone using this package has migrated to
skylighting and then remove it.
hi, highlighting-kate was just removed from testing at your request, but
carettah still build-depends on it in both testing and
unstable.
Should I go ahead and file a rc b
Your message dated Thu, 06 Aug 2020 10:33:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#963443: fixed in apache-curator 2.7.1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #963443,
regarding apache-curator: FTBFS: [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin:3.8.1:compile (d
Hi
> We are now looking for a new debian sponsor to upload our latest
> version to the debian repository.
I guess I can help there for now but better don't rely on me for long-term
sponsoring. What exactly would you want uploaded? Do you have the package
somewhere? or github HEAD?
Christoph
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo
