Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notfixed 945384 3.3.0-1
Bug #945384 [src:visp] visp: autopkgtest regression
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #945384 to the same values
previously set
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
Control: reopen -1
Control: notfixed 3.3.0-1
The autopkgtests of visp 3.3.0-1 still fail the same way. Installing
libvisp-dev still does not pull in libopengl-dev (libOpenGL.so), libglx-dev
(libGLX.so), libglu1-mesa-dev (libGLU.so), or libcoin-dev (libCoin.so),
which means trying to link against
Processing control commands:
> reopen -1
Bug #945384 {Done: Fabien Spindler } [src:visp] visp:
autopkgtest regression
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
Bug reopened
No longer marked as fixe
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 953776 important
Bug #953776 [src:qgis] qgis: FTBFS on mips64el
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
953776: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport
On Friday, March 13, 2020 6:36:59 PM EDT Sandro Tosi wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 3:51 PM Scott Kitterman
wrote:
> > I don't know of a reason not to go ahead, but if you do, please be careful
> > of what's already in git. Update to the new version is staged there. It
> > is blocked on updat
Source: dict-gazetteer2k
Severity: serious
Hello,
i believe this package should be removed:
* python2-only
* last upstream upload in 2001 (makes sense)
* last maintainer upload in 2006, from there 4 NMUs
* last reverse dependes on python-dictclient (py2removal effort)
* does it still make sense t
Your message dated Sat, 14 Mar 2020 04:19:47 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#953742: fixed in vim 2:8.2.0378-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #953742,
regarding vim: FTBFS on armel, armhf, i386, mips64el, mipsel, s390x
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Sat, 14 Mar 2020 03:16:46 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#953845: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #937231,
regarding paisley: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been d
Your message dated Sat, 14 Mar 2020 03:14:37 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#953840: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #937241,
regarding parsley: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been d
Your message dated Sat, 14 Mar 2020 03:15:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#953842: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #938268,
regarding python-wstools: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Sat, 14 Mar 2020 03:11:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#953818: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #953818,
regarding RM: python-paver -- RoM; python2-only; no upload since 2013; no
rdeps; Maintainer agrees with removal
to be marked a
Your message dated Sat, 14 Mar 2020 03:13:15 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#953835: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #945675,
regarding ganglia-nagios-bridge: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the prob
Your message dated Sat, 14 Mar 2020 03:12:20 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#953833: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #876301,
regarding captagent: Broken init script
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Your message dated Sat, 14 Mar 2020 03:11:21 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#947607: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #936472,
regarding egenix-mx-base: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Sat, 14 Mar 2020 03:11:52 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#953818: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #938007,
regarding python-paver: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
Your message dated Sat, 14 Mar 2020 03:13:44 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#953837: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #923319,
regarding dynalogin: FTBFS with pam >= 1.3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit
Paulo Matos writes:
> Upstream issue reference for:
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=948789
> Mailing list information:
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/racket-dev/o631-azv-5g/r9Ct1H_KDAAJ
I'm not sure if this is a surprise or not, but it looks like the 7.6 is
breaking in t
Your message dated Sat, 14 Mar 2020 01:34:16 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#953849: fixed in debootstrap 1.0.123
has caused the Debian Bug report #953849,
regarding missing check triggers undesired unmounting of the whole target
(breaks d-i)
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Package: ardentryst
Severity: serious
Hello,
i believe this package should be removed:
* python2-only
* dead upstream:
* last new upstream release in debian in 2011
* https://sourceforge.net/projects/ardentryst/ reports "Status: Abandoned"
* http://www.jordantrudgett.com/ardentryst/ is dead
Package: pymissile
Severity: serious
Hello,
i believe this package should be removed:
* python2-only
* dead upstream, no new releases since 2007 (!)
* no debian uploads since 2016
* last reverse dependency of python-usb (py2removal effort)
if i dont hear back within a week with a good reason to
Package: tinywm
Severity: serious
Hello,
i believe this package should be removed:
* no upstream release since 2005 (!!!)
* no upload since 2012
* last reverse dependency of python-xlib (py2removal effort)
if i dont hear back within a week a good reason to keep this package, i'll file
for its re
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #953849 in debootstrap reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/debootstrap/-/commit/129f6f199ffd3d1e58
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #953849 [debootstrap] missing check triggers undesired unmounting of the
whole target (breaks d-i)
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #953849 to the same tags previously set
--
953849: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=953849
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #953849 [debootstrap] missing check triggers undesired unmounting of the
whole target (breaks d-i)
Added tag(s) pending.
--
953849: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=953849
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #953849 in debootstrap reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/debootstrap/-/commit/a1a69a111e9d39fe70
Your message dated Sat, 14 Mar 2020 00:55:59 +
with message-id <20200314005559.blabn7gurywmneb3@debian>
and subject line Re: aide: ftbfs with GCC-9
has caused the Debian Bug report #925630,
regarding aide: ftbfs with GCC-9
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has be
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 953849 missing check triggers undesired unmounting of the whole
> target (breaks d-i)
Bug #953849 [debootstrap] debootstrap: broken runtime (at least in d-i)
Changed Bug title to 'missing check triggers undesired unmounting of the whole
Package: debootstrap
Version: 1.0.121
Severity: serious
Justification: RoM
[ Could have been filed against debootstrap-udeb instead, but this might
also break use cases with regular debootstrap too. ]
While reviewing the recent changes in debootstrap (#953759), I was
concerned with commit 7ecd819
Hi Sandro.
Honestly, I have not contributed to Debian in a couple of years, and I don’t
see that changing any time soon. Best to contact Matthias, the Python Team, or
just do whatever you think is best.
Cheers,
-Barry
> On Mar 13, 2020, at 12:32, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>
> On Fri, 30 Aug 2019 0
I was looking at this bug today and I did not get any error in building
the current version.
Build Architecture: amd64
Build Type: full
Build-Space: 1596216
Build-Time: 325
Distribution: unstable
Host Architecture: amd64
Install-Time: 192
Job: /home/sudip/debian/librecad/librecad_2.1.3-1.2.dsc
Lin
Control: tags 925753 + patch
Control: tags 925753 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for libneo4j-client (versioned as 2.2.0-1.1) and
uploaded it to mentors for sponsoring. Please feel free to tell me if I
should remove it.
--
Regards
Sudip
diff -Nru libneo4j-client-2.2.0/debian/ch
Processing control commands:
> tags 925753 + patch
Bug #925753 [src:libneo4j-client] libneo4j-client: ftbfs with GCC-9
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 925753 + pending
Bug #925753 [src:libneo4j-client] libneo4j-client: ftbfs with GCC-9
Added tag(s) pending.
--
925753: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #953783 {Done: Samuel Thibault }
[src:installation-guide] src:installation-guide: fails to migrate to testing
for too long
Added tag(s) pending.
--
953783: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=953783
Debian Bug Tracking System
Cont
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #953783 in installation-guide reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/installation-guide/-/commit/7971
Your message dated Fri, 13 Mar 2020 23:49:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#953783: fixed in installation-guide 20191229+rebuild1
has caused the Debian Bug report #953783,
regarding src:installation-guide: fails to migrate to testing for too long
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Fri, 13 Mar 2020 23:34:57 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#937897: fixed in python-lockfile 1:0.12.2-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #937897,
regarding python-lockfile: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
Package: psychopy
Version: 2020.1.3+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install
because it tries to overwrite other packages files.
>From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):
Selec
Hi,
> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/468909506/sdpa_7.3.13+dfsg-1_7.3.13+dfsg-1ubuntu1.diff.gz
>
> Can I upload the following fix? otherwise the package won't ever go in testing
>
> G.
Makoto is now working on a package with this fix.
Would you please wait for his fix?
Best regards,
Nobuhiro
-
Please remove!
Sandro Tosi:
> Package: python-paver
> Severity: serious
>
> Hello,
> i believe this package should be removed:
>
> * python2-only
> * while upstream has released a py3k compatible version (and several others in
> between the one in the archive), the debian maintainer didnt up
Hi Gianfranco,
2020年3月8日(日) 17:10 Gianfranco Costamagna :
>
> control: tags -1 patch
>
> the following works.
> diff -Nru sdpa-7.3.12+dfsg/debian/changelog sdpa-7.3.12+dfsg/debian/changelog
> --- sdpa-7.3.12+dfsg/debian/changelog2019-12-06 08:00:00.0 +0100
> +++ sdpa-7.3.12+dfsg/debian
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 953818 ftp.debian.org
Bug #953818 [python-paver] python-paver: should this package be removed?
Bug reassigned from package 'python-paver' to 'ftp.debian.org'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #953818 to the same values
pre
Processing control commands:
> tags 937897 + patch
Bug #937897 [src:python-lockfile] python-lockfile: Python2 removal in
sid/bullseye
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #937897 to the same tags previously set
--
937897: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=937897
939930: https:/
Processing control commands:
> tags 937897 + patch
Bug #937897 [src:python-lockfile] python-lockfile: Python2 removal in
sid/bullseye
Added tag(s) patch.
--
937897: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=937897
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags 937897 + patch
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for python-lockfile (versioned as 1:0.12.2-2.1). The diff
is attached to this message.
Regards.
diff -Nru python-lockfile-0.12.2/debian/changelog python-lockfile-0.12.2/debian/changelog
--- python-lockfile-0.12.2/debian/changel
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 953807 0.6.0-1
Bug #953807 [src:tftpy] tftpy: should this package be removed?
Marked as found in versions tftpy/0.6.0-1.
> tags 953807 + sid bullseye
Bug #953807 [src:tftpy] tftpy: should this package be removed?
Added tag(s) bullseye and si
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 952347 libreoffice-dev 1:6.4.1~rc1-2
Bug #952347 [src:openclipart] openclipart: FTBFS:
/usr/lib/libreoffice/program/gengal.bin: symbol lookup error:
/usr/lib/libreoffice/program/gengal.bin: undefined symbol: _Z10getGlxPipev
Bug reassign
Test
Your message dated Fri, 13 Mar 2020 22:41:23 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#953823: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #937931,
regarding python-mrjob: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
Your message dated Fri, 13 Mar 2020 22:40:16 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#953813: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #938279,
regarding python-xmltv: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 953806 953830
Bug #953806 {Done: Matthias Klose } [cpp-9] cpp-9: no include
path in which to search for limits.h
Bug #953815 {Done: Matthias Klose } [cpp-9] libc6-dev: Cannot
build GNU Emacs - limits.h error in configure
Bug #953815 {
Your message dated Fri, 13 Mar 2020 22:40:37 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#953814: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #942990,
regarding ditrack: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been d
Your message dated Fri, 13 Mar 2020 22:42:17 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#953825: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #936180,
regarding backports.ssl-match-hostname: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that t
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 953830 cpp-9
Bug #953830 [gcc-9] /usr/include/limits.h:124:26: error: no include path in
which to search for limits.h
Bug reassigned from package 'gcc-9' to 'cpp-9'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #953830 to the same val
Your message dated Fri, 13 Mar 2020 22:41:45 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#953824: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #936735,
regarding inotifyx: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Fri, 13 Mar 2020 22:36:48 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#929544: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #938758,
regarding urlgrabber: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has bee
Your message dated Fri, 13 Mar 2020 22:38:24 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#953746: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #936629,
regarding gnukhata-core-engine: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
Your message dated Fri, 13 Mar 2020 22:39:53 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#953808: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #938196,
regarding python-statistics: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Fri, 13 Mar 2020 22:39:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#953753: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #952074,
regarding foodcritic: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby2.7" failed.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
Your message dated Fri, 13 Mar 2020 22:38:46 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#953750: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #885486,
regarding tekka: Depends on unmaintained pygtk
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Fri, 13 Mar 2020 22:38:46 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#953750: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #938604,
regarding sushi: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dea
Your message dated Fri, 13 Mar 2020 22:37:55 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#953738: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #916508,
regarding netplan: Should not be included in buster
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Fri, 13 Mar 2020 22:39:30 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#953771: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #950043,
regarding python-invocations FTBFS: test failures
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been de
control: reassign -1 gcc-9
control: forcemerge 953806 -1
On 2020-03-13 23:00, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Package: libc6-dev
> Version: 2.30-2
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> Unsure whether it’s upstream or Debian, but…
It's debian specific and not a glibc issue. Rea
On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 3:51 PM Scott Kitterman wrote:
>
> I don't know of a reason not to go ahead, but if you do, please be careful of
> what's already in git. Update to the new version is staged there. It is
> blocked on updates for some of the packages it builds wheels from.
oooh i see yo
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 gcc-9
Bug #953830 [libc6-dev] /usr/include/limits.h:124:26: error: no include path in
which to search for limits.h
Bug reassigned from package 'libc6-dev' to 'gcc-9'.
No longer marked as found in versions glibc/2.30-2.
Ignoring request to alter fixed ver
On Sun, 2020-01-05 at 11:27 +0100, Adrian Vollmer wrote:
> After upgrading python3-wsproto to version 0.15.0-2, mitmproxy fails
> immediately with this error message:
>
> ImportError: cannot import name 'WSConnection' from 'wsproto.connection'
> (/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/wsproto/conn
Your message dated Fri, 13 Mar 2020 23:09:38 +0100
with message-id <67d7d12e-62a4-5e0f-95cf-5a8a0d5fa...@debian.org>
and subject line scilab-ann has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #926094,
regarding src:scilab-ann: FTBFS, scilab hangs
to be marked as done.
This means tha
Source: drmaa
Version: 0.7.9-1
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: fails-always
Dear maintainers,
With a recent upload of drmaa you added an autopkgtest, great. However,
it fails. I copied some of the output at the bottom of this r
Your message dated Fri, 13 Mar 2020 23:09:38 +0100
with message-id <67d7d12e-62a4-5e0f-95cf-5a8a0d5fa...@debian.org>
and subject line scilab-ann has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #897550,
regarding scilab-ann: FTBFS: /usr/bin/scilab-bin: error while loading shared
libra
Package: libc6-dev
Version: 2.30-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Unsure whether it’s upstream or Debian, but…
tglase@tglase-nb:~ $ gcc x.c
In file included from x.c:1:
/usr/include/limits.h:124:26: error: no include path in which to search for
limits.h
124 | # includ
Your message dated Fri, 13 Mar 2020 22:56:47 +0100
with message-id <99e17f67-5d91-cef0-854c-cbbb7d66a...@debian.org>
and subject line tortoisehg has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #935660,
regarding tortoisehg: Obsolete libs (python2) - depends python-pyqt5.qsci
to be mar
Your message dated Fri, 13 Mar 2020 22:56:47 +0100
with message-id <99e17f67-5d91-cef0-854c-cbbb7d66a...@debian.org>
and subject line tortoisehg has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #921704,
regarding tortoisehg: uninstallable with mercurial 4.9
to be marked as done.
This
Source: nevow
Severity: serious
Hello,
i believe this package should be removed:
* python2-only
* upstream still hasnt finish porting it to python3,
https://github.com/twisted/nevow/issues/101
* no rdeps
* relatively low popcon and dropping rapidly
if i dont hear back within a week with a good
Source: r-cran-rprotobuf
Version: 0.4.15-1
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: regression
Dear maintainers,
With a recent upload of r-cran-rprotobuf the autopkgtest of
r-cran-rprotobuf fails in testing when that autopkgtest is run
Your message dated Fri, 13 Mar 2020 21:19:17 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#953682: fixed in dosage 2.15-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #953682,
regarding src:dosage: fails to migrate to testing for too long
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Processing control commands:
> fixed -1 0.0.3
Bug #953822 [src:debian-cloud-images] src:debian-cloud-images: fails to migrate
to testing for too long
Marked as fixed in versions debian-cloud-images/0.0.3.
--
953822: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=953822
Debian Bug Tracking Sy
Source: debian-cloud-images
Version: 0.0.1
Severity: serious
Control: fixed -1 0.0.3
Tags: sid bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
As recently announced [1], the Release Team now considers packages that
are out-of-sync between testing an
Source: foolscap
Severity: serious
Hello,
i belive this package should be removed:
* python2-only
* upstream hasnt finish porting it to python3
https://github.com/warner/foolscap/issues/48
* no rdeps in testing
if i dont hear back within a week with a good reason to keep it, i'm gonna file
for
Package: python-paver
Severity: serious
Hello,
i believe this package should be removed:
* python2-only
* while upstream has released a py3k compatible version (and several others in
between the one in the archive), the debian maintainer didnt upload this
package since late 2013
* no rdeps
*
close 949732 3.2.2-3
thanks
merge Ubuntu patch which addresses the issue
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 949732 3.2.2-3
Bug #949732 [src:mlpack] package ftbfs on some archs, and has missing
dependencies
Marked as fixed in versions mlpack/3.2.2-3.
Bug #949732 [src:mlpack] package ftbfs on some archs, and has missing
dependencies
Marked Bug as
Sven writes:
> Known problem, wait for gcc-9 9.3.0-3 to appear on your mirror.
Thanks - sorry for hitting the wrong "target" (I only looked at
libc6-dev and glibc bugs :-/)
> Welcome to unstable!
Been here since bo.
Best regards,
Adam
--
"Vilken sanning, Måns, är sann?"
I don't know of a reason not to go ahead, but if you do, please be careful of
what's already in git. Update to the new version is staged there. It is
blocked on updates for some of the packages it builds wheels from.
Scott K
On March 13, 2020 7:32:35 PM UTC, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>On Fri, 30 Au
Your message dated Fri, 13 Mar 2020 20:38:47 +0100
with message-id <4354a783-e51c-d987-30a9-388294ead...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#953806: cpp-9: no include path in which to search for
limits.h
has caused the Debian Bug report #953806,
regarding libc6-dev: Cannot build GNU Emacs - limit
Your message dated Fri, 13 Mar 2020 20:38:47 +0100
with message-id <4354a783-e51c-d987-30a9-388294ead...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#953806: cpp-9: no include path in which to search for
limits.h
has caused the Debian Bug report #953806,
regarding cpp-9: no include path in which to search
On Fri, 30 Aug 2019 07:44:13 + Matthias Klose wrote:
> Package: src:python-pip
> Version: 18.1-5
> Severity: normal
> Tags: sid bullseye
> User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: py2removal
the only rdeps of `bin:python-pip` have been removed from testing, so
it's probably time we dr
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 cpp-9
Bug #953815 [libc6-dev] libc6-dev: Cannot build GNU Emacs - limits.h error in
configure
Bug reassigned from package 'libc6-dev' to 'cpp-9'.
No longer marked as found in versions glibc/2.30-2.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #953815
Your message dated Fri, 13 Mar 2020 19:19:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#953766: fixed in glib-networking 2.64.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #953766,
regarding glib-networking: tests fail with GLib 2.64:
tls/tests/connection.c:2035:quit_on_handshake_complete: assertion faile
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #953766 [src:glib-networking] glib-networking: tests fail with GLib 2.64:
tls/tests/connection.c:2035:quit_on_handshake_complete: assertion failed (error
== (g-tls-error-quark, 3)): error is NULL
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #953766 to t
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #953766 in glib-networking reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/glib-networking/-/commit/ffb51dd367ca5d
Your message dated Fri, 13 Mar 2020 19:55:14 +0100
with message-id <87ftecjd9p@turtle.gmx.de>
and subject line Re: Bug#953806: cpp-9: no include path in which to search for
limits.h
has caused the Debian Bug report #953806,
regarding cpp-9: no include path in which to search for limits.h
to be
Compare:
cventin:~> cpp-8 tst.c
# 1 "tst.c"
# 1 ""
# 1 ""
# 31 ""
# 1 "/usr/include/stdc-predef.h" 1 3 4
# 32 "" 2
# 1 "tst.c"
# 1 "/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/8/include-fixed/limits.h" 1 3 4
[...]
cventin:~> cpp-9 tst.c
# 1 "tst.c"
# 1 ""
# 1 ""
# 31 ""
# 1 "/usr/include/stdc-predef.h" 1 3 4
#
Your message dated Fri, 13 Mar 2020 18:07:48 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#937942: fixed in python-netaddr 0.7.19-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #937942,
regarding python-netaddr: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Source: tftpy
Severity: serious
Hello,
i believe this package should be removed:
* python2-only
* upstream released 0.8.0, py3k-compatible, but it's now non-free, see
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=784028#10
* still in https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=784028#
Package: cpp-9
Version: 9.3.0-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The compilation of a simple program like
#include
int main (void)
{
return 0;
}
now fails:
cventin:~> gcc-9 tst.c -o tst
In file included from tst.c:1:
/usr/include/limits.h:124:26: error: no include pat
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #937942 in python-netaddr reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/modules/python-netaddr/-/commit/02dc442
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #937942 [src:python-netaddr] python-netaddr: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
Added tag(s) pending.
--
937942: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=937942
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Source: gpgme1.0
Version: 1.13.1-7
Severity: serious
Justification: test failure on release architecture
Tags: patch
Hello, looks like checky2106 is obviously failing on 32bit architectures. I
suggest to just ignore
the test results on that architectures.
Patch:
diff -Nru gpgme1.0-1.13.1/debia
Source: mandos
Version: 1.8.9-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: flaky
Hi,
it appears the autopkgtest on arm64 is not working reliably.
This is a serious issue as nowadays autopkgtest results are using for
gating testing migration.
E.g. currently systemd is blocked by
Your message dated Fri, 13 Mar 2020 16:20:27 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#950376: fixed in apertium-cy-en 0.1.1~r57554-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #950376,
regarding apertium-cy-en FTBFS with apertium 3.6.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
1 - 100 of 153 matches
Mail list logo
